tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC November 22, 2017 10:00pm-11:00pm PST
of 1974, wherever you ended up. and happy thanksgiving to you at home and everybody who helps make this show possible. i'm incredibly thankful for you all, absurdity and the rest of >> good evening. i'm grateful for you saying good evening to me every night that we do this together. you know, the really name of the show should be riding the rachel wave with lawrence o'donnell. that's what i'm doing at 10:00. >> that's absurd, my friend, but thank you for saying so, my dear. >> get out 0 of that building and start the vacation right now. thank you. >> i'm pre-full and thinking about it. thank you, dear. >> thank you. well, president trump's hometown newspaper "the new york daily news" hates donald trump. okay? they hate donald trump. and so, this was their front page headline today which was predictable for the "new york daily news." i'm with perv.
trump endorsed accused kid molester moore. now, donald trump's other hometown tabloid newspaper, "the new york post," loves donald trump. "the new york post" is owned by rupert murdoch and under a clear editorial order to love everything donald trump says and does. until today. when even the trump worshipping "the new york post" ran basically the same headline as "the daily news," i'm with the perv, trump backs roy moore. donald trump is unique among american politics. he is the only one who's admitted and boasted about his preferred methods of sexual assault. he did that on the famous "access hollywood" video grabbing women any way he wanted including the most sexually assaultive way of grabbing a woman. so, it was no surprise to anyone that donald trump has sided with
the perv as the new york tabloids put it because in trump world nothing is more forgivable or understandable or even worthy of boasting about than sexual assault. >> mr. president, is aaccused child molester better than the democrat? is an accused -- >> he denies. it. look. if you look at what is really going on and you look at the things that have happened over the last 48 hours, he totally denies it. he says it didn't happen and, you know, you have to listen to him, also. you're talking about -- he said 40 years ago this did not happen so you know. >> with the special election in alabama only 20 days away, roy moore has not dared to have a public event since last thursday. campaign announced today that the communications director resigned bringing the campaign staff down to six people. last night an interview on a conservative radio show, roy
moore did his best imitation of donald trump. >> roy moore followed donald trump's example to threaten to sue his accusers, a threat that is every bit as much a lie when roy moore says it as when donald trump said it during the presidential campaign. >> do you plan to pursue any legal action with defamation against any of these people, "the washington post" or anybody regardless? some people believe that shows that you're serious about proving your innocence. >> we're talking about "the washington post." we're talking about the women involved. >> republican senator jeff flake emerging as the conscious of the republican senate said this today. >> i think the president made a big mistake there.
i think that he should distance himself from roy moore. even if it means losing that seat. if the choice is between roy moore and the democrat, i would vote for the democrat if i lived in alabama. to paint somebody else as more evil somehow because he has a more liberal philosophy than somebody who may have been a child predator, i just -- i don't think that's right. and even if you lose a vote in the senate among republicans, that's better than being the party of roy moore. >> after president trump reendorsed roy moore yesterday, republican strategist tim miller tweeted, i just donated to a democrat for the first time in my life. if any of you all want to do so, as well. enough is enough. in an article posted today, tim miller wrote, roy moore is worse than abuser of children. he is an abuser of children when's also a hateful gig out. deserves no cover and no seat in
the united states senate and he never did. in this election, it is not a close call. on stengs is not an issue. roy moore is a disgraceful by gotted deviant beneath our collective contempt. joining us, tim miller, former communications director for jeb bush 2016 and a columnist for boss tom globe and with the pointer institute for media studios and david jolly of florida with us. tim miller, you reaction to the president's re-endorsing of roy moore. clearly we understand through your tweet you went to the point of contributing but what's your argument to republicans who say i am going to write in a different republican name than roy moore on that ballot? >> well, lawrence, on this night in 1963, john f. kennedy was do give a speech where the purpose
of the speech was to say that our duties not nearly to the preservation -- not merely the preservation of political power. and that is all donald trump cares about, is his short-term political power and that's why it was so disgusting when yesterday or two days ago he came out and gave roy moore a clearly somebody that engaged in child molestation cover and so my message to republicans in alabama is this. you know, look much everybody has a personal option. if you feel like you need to abstain, i understand that. the reality is it's doug jones or roy moore in the u.s. senate. and roy moore is a child molester. one who on multiple occasions abused young women, as young as the age of 14 and he spent his entire career trying to undermine gay and lesbian alabamans and americans who just
wanted to be with the person that they loved and all roy moore dedicated his entire career to was trying to prevent them from doing that while he was trying to court or date as he said 14-year-old girls. this is a sick person. and so, for me if the option is doug jones, who i don't really know that much about and seems like a perfect replacement level democrat, or roy moore, a pedophile, it isn't really a tough call. >> to show how much the model of the roy moore defense so far in the campaign mirrors the trump defense in the presidential campaign, we have seen roy moore's wife come out and defend him just as melania trump did in the campaign calling the accusers of donald trump liars. let's listen to what melania trump said during the campaign. >> i believe my husband. i believe my husband. this was all organized from the opposition.
and we -- the details that they -- did they ever check the background of these women? they don't have any facts. >> that is basically what roy moore's wife is doing these days in that campaign. >> yeah. i don't think it's really getting her very far insofar as i think the people that believe roy moore continue to believe him and his wife bolsters that and people that don't believe them, i don't think she's convincing anybody. look. roy moore is at the point in the campaign where he's lost republicans of tim miller and that was an excellent column and i really -- you know, exhort all of your viewers to read that column. >> he just went through point by point. you know, he's lost john rogers his communications director. he lost representative joe barton who basically was himself exposed today for having sent
out a nude selfie and wanted to point out it's a consensual, adult relationship. it wasn't with a child. i mean, essentially, that's the low bar now that we're talking about in the sexual assault an sexual harassment cases. he's lost a large wing of the gop. and if we're really just down to republicans in alabama thinking that this is better than having a democrat, i mean, i think we just go back to your covers that you showed of i'm with perv. it's extremely disturbing but i disagree with one of the earlier clips you were showing, you know, jeff flake when he says the president should do this, should not back roy moore, the reason he has to back roy moore is because if he doesn't then, of course, his own actions come into question. he's saying roy moore denies it. the implication is i donald trump denied everything i was accused of doing with more than a dozen women and you should therefore believe both of us. >> and, david jolly, we have breaking news at this hour about
your former colleague representative joe barton who indira was talking about. "the washington post" moments ago has added to that story with the headline, congressman told woman he would report her to capital police if she exposed his secret sex life and that is a story about congressman joe barton telling this woman who had these photographs that he is now very embarrassed about that he would engage the capital police to stop her from spreading any information about him and, david, this seems like something that's going to be headed to the ethics committee and the house of representatives. >> lawrence, and you know this. there's so much more that is going to break from capitol hill and the coming weeks as a result of women rightfully coming forward. and i don't want to speak specifically to a case i don't know a lot about but i know this. listen. congress is a place where a lot
of different types of people get elected. very good people but there's some very bad people. there are some creepy people. there are some freaks, some people you wonder how in the world did they first get elected and people that behave badly. a thing john boehner did is run them out of office and seeing more come of this. you know, what tim did in his column and jeff flake has done is very important because what they're doing is giving republicans permission to distance themselves from fellow republicans and it's very important in races like roy moore to give permission to republicans to vote for a democrat, to vote for doug jones and honor the principle of country over party. republicans right now need permission to criticize their own just as democrats do, as well. as we learn more from capitol hill. >> just want to -- >> if i could add to that, lawrence. just briefly, yeah, look. her's the thing. that is republican seat again in three years. right? this is alabama. and so, hopefully the republicans in three years we can nominate a decent person and
there are plenty of decent republicans in alabama. i don't think that voters in alabama need to worry that this is going to -- they're going to lose this seat to, you know, pro-choice democrats forever. this is a short-term choice between two people and the important voters in this election are people basically like me and representative jolly. college educated republicans who are trying to decide between just abstaining and voting for doug jones, that can be the difference of whether a bigoted child molesters is in the senate or not and that's why doug jones is the clear answer. >> i want to bring you and the viewers up to date about this breaking news and the lead of this article. it says representative joe barton who apologized wednesday for a lewd photo of him on the internet told the woman to whom he had sent sexually explicit vid knows, photos and messages to report her to the capital police if she exposed his behavior according to a recording reviewed by "the
washington post." the woman spoke to the "the washington post" after the lewd photo was published tuesday by an anonymous twitter account. she shared a secretly recorded phone conversation she had with barton in 2015 in which he warned her against using the explicit materials, quote, in a way that would negatively affect my career. and so, indira, here we have a recording of barton saying that he would use the capital police to try to prevent her from doing anything that would negatively affect my career. and when you look back at the anthony weinerer case, nancy pelosi forced him to resign from the house of representatives basically for material like this. that was years before anthony weinerer committed a crime for which he is not serving time. >> right. you point out, lawrence, this seems to have a criminal aspect to it, threatening someone.
not quite extortion but something like blackmail. threatening someone with legal action. i mean, look. one thing you point out nancy pelosi. democrats have been quick it seems to me in pushing for ethics investigations of democrats in congress like al franken, like john conyers accused of harassment. we have not seen the same solid front from republicans calling for investigations of gop people. i mean, i do think for the great part most republicans in congress have really stood against roy moore. which is important. but again, as tim points out and david points out, we are talking about someone alleged to have assaulted children. girl teenagers. so again, that is a low bar. i just want to say one thing about roy moore continuing today threatening legal action of his own against supposed libel, the press, the women making the accusations and this really is
not real. that's not a real threat. that's a dog whistle to supporters trying to say, you know, i'm innocent. you know? i'm going to go after them. and its threat to these women in the same way that representative barton was threatening women. this guy is trying to say, don't come after me because i could do legal action against you. don't forget, the president himself donald trump before he was president used threats of legal action many times against the media and didn't actually go through with them. it's incredibly hard, the standard for libel in this country is very hard. ever since, you know, "the new york times" sullivan case and the supreme court. so i think it's nothing more than trying to protect himself. it is not real. >> here's more from "the washington post" report and remember now, they're reporting from an audio tape that they have heard of this conversation. the woman says to congressman barton, how would you use the capital police in what would you tell the capital police? congressman barton says, i would tell them i had a three-year undercover relationship with you
over the internet that was heavily sexual and that i had met you twice while married and had sex with you on two different occasions and that i exchanged inappropriate photographs and videos with you that i wouldn't like to be seen made public, that you still apparently had all of those and were in a position to use them in a way that would negatively affect my career. that's the truth. david jolly, when you hear that and in the congressman's own voice and you consider that nancy pelosi told anthony weiner he had to go, is this a situation of paul ryan comes in and does the same thing that nancy pelosi did? >> it may be. and, lawrence, listen. there's a difference offalability and criminality. we are all fallible. i certainly am myself. we are seeing two things emerge from the national conversation and two important themes that emerged. one is beginning to see different degrees of offenses. they're all wrong.
every single one of them is wrong. right? but there's a difference between the predatory nature of it, donald trump and a roy moore and the behavior of, say, an al franken and still wrong but a different degree of sexual harassment or sexual assault. and that is important because as the number of cases emerge, we need to assess who are the different degrees of criminality and fallibility and other thing to see and probably most important, we are seeing a variance of responses. we are seeing roy moore and as indira say yell fake news an attack the victims and the credibility of the women but we're also seeing people like al franken saying it was wrong, i admit it, i'm asking for forgiveness and say to the women thank you for coming forward and i accept an investigation into myself. we need to see that emerge in the national culture. men accepting responsibility. joe barton has a choice tonight. does he own this or not? >> david jolly and tim miller, thank you for joining us.
coming up, before hitting the golf course this morning, the president used his precious time to attack the father of a college basketball player on twitter proving that presidential time is no longer precious. us. it's what this country is made of. but right now, our bond is fraying. how do we get back to "us"? the y fills the gaps. and bridges our divides. donate to your local y today. because where there's a y, there's an us.
we are continuing our breaking news coverage of a "the washington post" report coming out minutes ago under the headline congressman told woman he would report her to capitol police if she exposed his secret sex life, that congressman is texas republican congressman joe barton. joining the conversation now, eugene robinson, opinion writer for "the washington post" and msnbc political analyst and indira lakshmanan with "the boston globe" is still with us. this is the extraordinary report and began with a report that
congressman barton with photographs out there of his genitalia revealed online. and i just want to re-read the lead of "the washington post" article so the audience can process this. it says that representative joe barton who apologized on wednesday for a lewd photo of hin on the internet told a woman whom he had sent sexually explit sit videos and messages to report her to the capitol police if she exposed his behavior according to an audio recording of "the washington post." the quoets from the recording are truly explosive. there is a recording here and i think we can trust that "the washington post" got this dialogue right. >> yeah. i'm sure. story says that our reporter heard the tape and so i'm sure -- i'm sure that it's right. there's a context here that i'm not entirely clear on.
i've read the story quickly. and so, it's clear that representative barton on the tape makes a threat to go to the capitol police and to start an investigation. it's not clear what the antecedent is and happened before that. is she threatening to expose a relationship and his -- is she threatening that she will do that if he doesn't do something else? i'm not clear on that part of the story. >> that is -- >> who's extorting whom here. >> that is something that congressman barton alleges in his comments to "the washington post." i'm going to read what the congressman said. he said, the woman admitted that we had a consensual relationship, barton said, when i ended that relationship she threatened to publicly share my private photographs and intimate correspondence in retaliation. as the transcript reflects.
i offered to take the matter to the capitol police to open an investigation. today the capitol police reached out to me and offered to launch an investigation and i have accepted. because of the pending investigation, we will have no further comment. and indira, that says to me there's absolutely no avoid answer of a house ethics committee investigation, also. >> right. i mean, that could be headed off by a possible resignation. i mean, representative barton had already said earlier today before this even came out when all we were dealing with at that point is a nude selfie, we had said that he would step back and take time to consider his actions and everything which to me sounded like somebody who was sort of giving in and potentially backing out of his seat. i mean, i do want to stress again he was trying to distinguish hix from the far worse allegations against roy moore, you know, essentially saying at least i'm not a pedophile.
this was an adult, consensual relationship. it is interesting and i think you're absolutely right it opens up an ethics investigation if he doesn't step down before that himself. >> lawrence, i thought by the way that we had established with anthony weiner that if you're a member of the u.s. congress it is a very, very bad idea to have pictures of your genitalia on -- you know, on the internet. have them send them by electronic means to anyone. and one would think that most members of congress had learned that lesson. >> and, anthony weiner was sending pictures to people, adults who were engaged in this communication with him. so it -- and the crime that anthony weiner is currently serving time for is something he committed years after nancy pelosi forced him to resign. >> correct. >> "the washington post" reports that the woman said she never
had any intention to use the materials to retaliate against barton and i just want to read once again what apparently the capitol police will find out in this investigation, if they speak to congressman barton, because he said on tape to the woman in this phone call, she said to him, what would you say to the capitol police if you get them to intervene? and he said this. i would tell them that i had a three-year undercover relationship with you over the internet that was heavily sexual and that i had met you twice while married and had sex with you on two different occasions and that i exchanged inappropriate photographs and videos with you that i wouldn't like to be seen made public. that you still apparently had all of those and were in a position to use them in a way that would negatively affect my career. that's the truth.
and, gene, if that's the truth and that's what he wants to tell the house ethics committee, i don't know how he holds on to the seat. >> yeah. i think it puts him in a difficult position. i think both of these people frankly will find themselves in difficult position. i don't know where this woman is. i assume she might be in texas. texas has a law against what is commonly known as revenge porn. so she could face some legal difficulties. certainly authorities will want to know how those -- that photograph came into the public eye. but representative barton will certainly be subject to an investigation. and i think it's very difficult for him to stay. >> we've got to get a break here. indira, thank you very much for joining us. really appreciate it. >> thanks, lawrence. happy thanksgiving. >> thank you. you, too. we'll be right back. really?
nothing has provoked less original thought than the most thought provoking event in the politics of the 21st century, the election of donald trump as president of the united states. what passes for thought in the pundit class is usually simply an exchange of cliches, especially if those cliches were used as effective sounding explainers of any previous election. and the one thing on which all pundit cliches are based is an assumption about the fundamental decency of the american voter and not just some american voters offer most american voters but the fundamental decency of all american voters and so it is inconceivable in
the conventional wisdom of pundit world, for example, that racists could elect a president of the united states. and since most members of the pundit class in the 21st century have grown up without personally witnessing at close range anything they recognize as racist and since they live in places like new york and washington, d.c. at great distances from the voters in the states that tip the electoral college one way or the other, they live in fear of sounding elitist attributing any negative or nasty motivation to any american voter anywhere. and so, you've heard a lot about those white voters who tip the electoral college to donald trump in places they were hoping donald trump would bring back the steel mills and other jobs that have gone the way of the blacksmith in those towns. the latest entry in the explainers of the trump vote may be the most important yet. it is adam serwer's article of
the nationalist's delusion. mandatory reading for anyone to know how we got to here. adam serwer writes, a majority of white voters backed a candidate who assured them that they will never have to share this country with people of color as equals. that is the reality that all americans will have to deal with and one that most of the country has yet to confront. joining us now, adam serwer, senior editor for "the atlantic" and back with us, eugene robinson. adam, make the case for us as quickly as you can, the case this has been largely ignored by most of the analysis of the trump vote. >> well, look. i just want to say a lot of these people that i spoke to genuinely struggling and the solutions that trump was offering, essentially solutions offers to use state violence
against religious and ethnic minorities, wouldn't have appealed to them if they had not possessed some level of racial an mouse and not made sense and why so many people voted for the other candidate. but it's also impossible to explain donald trump's victory, you know, without that ideological lens. >> and whenever this comes up, gene, if you say anything about the racism that exists within the trump vote, you're immediately accused of calling all trump voters racist. >> exactly. >> but in an election where he came in second distant second in the 3 million voters and managed to squeak out the electoral college, every little vote counted and to take away racially motivated votes, donald trump wouldn't be president. >> no way to be president without racially motivated votes. lawrence, as you know, i didn't grow up in manhattan. i grew up in south carolina and south carolina is where lee atwater was from.
architect of the republican party's southern strategy which began in 1968 which essentially was a naked appeal to unreconstructed southern white racism that brought southern whites into the republican party where they have remained since. it was an extraordinary political move by then president richard nixon and it has proved enduring. and so, the idea that race plays a major factor in our elections, presidential elections isn't new to those of us who know that history. but clearly it is new to some people. they have managed to conveniently forget it. >> adam, your piece is possibly the most thorough explainer of the trump vote and it also -- >> thank you, lawrence. >> -- seems to explain why trump voters stick with donald trump even when he fails at some of
the policy things he promised to do or just ignores some of the policy promises that he made as a candidate. >> well, yeah. i mean, i think it's really interesting. to the extent trump pursued a muslim ban, a crackdown on immigration not simply gone after criminals but gone after, you know, dads taking the kids to school, you know, he's pulled back on policing the police. i mean, to a large extent, trump has, you know, he's engaged in these big culture war type conflicts with, say, black professional athletes or other, you know, prominent black public figures. i mean, i think in some ways trump is running the administration he promised. or at least in the ways that mattered a lot to the people who voted for him. >> but, gene, in another recent examination of the trump voters and attitude toward him today in pennsylvania, these were people who were saying they never expected him to bring back the
steel jobs but, boy, they really do love it taking on the nfl players. >> yeah. yeah. which is -- which is extraordinary. but there it is. i mean, he drove a cultural wedge. and race was a big part of that. i think it's very clear. he drew a line and said, you know, we want to go back to america the way it was and that to a lot of people meant when it was a whiter america. and when it wasn't -- it was a less latino america, when it seemed simpler. that appeal obviously doesn't connect with african-american voters or latino voters but connected with a lot of white voters. >> adam, you stress how important trump's birtherism attacks on president obama were in establishing his credentials in many ways with the voters. you say birtherism was
nationalism, a statement of values and a definition of who belongs in america by bracing the conspiracy theory of obama's faith and foreign birth and embracing a definition of being america that excluded the first black president. >> yeah. i mean, look. i think birtherism is sort of -- in a way it's this incredibly complex statement of what the ideal american is not supposed to be an it's not supposed to be, you know, a black man when's is son of a muslim immigrant whose name is barack obama. a key aspect of this is trump proposed discriminatory policies and called himself the least racist person you have ever met. i think the combination of two things is really important, both, you know, saying i want to pursue this racist policy and also being outraged at any
possible suggestion he would be discriminating. >> gene, going forward from here, there's the question of how trump opponents, how democrats campaign against this and with a solid democratic campaign it seems conceivable that you could isolate this kind of support in such a way that the democrats could get the electoral college votes they need. >> i think it's entirely possible, lawrence. you know? obviously we don't know what will happen between now and the next election but keep in mind barack obama did win both the electoral and the popular vote twice by much larger margins than donald trump won and, of course, donald trump lost the popular vote. so you know, i see this as a reaction to the fact that the country is changing and the country will continue to change. the country will continue to change demographically and
culturally and that arc of history is against this sort of back ward looking and in some respects outrightly racist point of view that trump projects for his voters. it's moving away from that and i -- will continue to. >> eugene robinson and adam serwer, thank you very much for joining us tonight. really appreciate it. thank you. >> thank you. coming up, president george w. bush's former ethics lawyer say that is kellyanne con way has broken the law again.
it's a small finger...a worm! like, a dagger? a tiny sword? bread...breadstick? a matchstick! a lamppost! coin slot! no? uhhh... 10 seconds. a stick! a walking stick! eiffel tower, mount kilimanjaro! (ding) time! sorry, it's a tandem bicycle. what? what?! as long as sloths are slow, you can count on geico saving folks money. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.
when it comes to travel, i sweat the details. late checkout... ...down-alternative pillows... ...and of course, price. tripadvisor helps you book a... ...hotel without breaking a sweat. because we now instantly... ...search over 200 booking sites ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want. don't sweat your booking. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices.
a way that sees the only path to fulfillment- is through others. ♪ the former director of the united states office of government ethics walter shub is accusing kellyanne conway of violating the hatch act because of an interview on for example news and preventing them from attempting to influence the outcome of an election through the position while on duty or on government property, tied to their official capacity. this is -- and i'm about to submit to you kellyanne conway on video, which is something i don't usually put you through but this is exhibit "a" in the case against kellyanne conway. >> folks, don't be fooled.
he will be a vote against tax cuts. he's weak on crime. weak on borders. strong on raising your taxes. terrible for property owners. >> so vote roy moore. >> a liberal and why he is not saying anything and why the media are trying to boost him. >> vote roy moore? >> i'm telling you that we want the votes in the senate to get this tax -- tax bill through. >> a white house spokesperson defended conway the politico saying she did not advocate for or against the election of a candidate an specifically declined to encourage alabamans to vote a certain way. she was speaking about issues and support for the president's agenda. president george w. bush's chief ethics lawyer richard painter said this is the second time that conway has broken the law. richard painter joins us next. nr for four years. you named it brad. you loved brad. and then you totaled him. you two had been through everything together.
two boyfriends, three jobs... you're like nothing can replace brad. then liberty mutual calls... and you break into your happy dance. if you sign up for better car replacement™, we'll pay for a car that's a model year newer with 15,000 fewer miles than your old one. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. 40 million americans are waking up to a gillette shave. and at our factory in boston, 1,200 workers are starting their day building on over a hundred years of heritage, craftsmanship and innovation. today we're bringing you america's number one shave at lower prices every day. putting money back in the pockets of millions of americans. as one of those workers, i'm proud to bring you gillette quality for less, because nobody can beat the men and women of gillette. gillette - the best a man can get.
your privacy makes you myt number 1 place to go number 2. i love you, but sometimes you stink. febreze air effects doesn't just mask, it cleans away odors. because the things you love the most can stink. and try febreze small spaces to clean away odors for up to 30 days. breathe happy with febreze. every day, on every street, in every town, across america. small businesses show their love to you. with some friendly advice,
a genuine smile and a warm welcome they make your town... well, your town. that's why american express is proud to be the founding partner of small business saturday. a day where you get to return that love, because shopping small makes a big difference. so, this saturday get up, get out, and shop small.
we're joined now by richard painter, professor of law at university of minnesota, chief ethics lawyer for president george w. bush. and, professor painter, kellyanne conway said to voters, don't be fooled. doug jones, he'll vote to raise taxes. he's weak on crime. he's weak on borders. the white house says she did not advocate voting for or against any candidate. how do you see this? thigh's absolute nonsense.
she repeatedly said negative things about mr. jones who's the democratic candidate for senator down there in alabama. she was telling voters not to vote for doug doug jones. and she was talking positively about roy moore, saying that they needed roy moore's vote in the senate to get tax reform approved. we know what was going on. she was advakting for the defeat of doug jones and for the election of roy moore to united states senate. she was doing it on the white house lawn in an official capacity interview. that's a violation of the hatch act. it's been around since 1939. makes it very clear that a united states government employee in the executive branch may not use his or her official position to advocate for or against a candidate in a partisan election. the only exception is the president of the united states and the vice president. every other executive branch
employee is under the hatch act. the presumptive penalty is firing. we already have the violation of government of office ethics violations a few months ago when she was showing interest for ivanka clothing and jewelry on fox and friends. and the office of government ethics found she had violated those. the hatch act is lot more serious than showing ivanka clothing on the television. it's a serious violation. in the bush white house we would have fired somebody on the spot for that. >> how is it enforced? how is the hatch act enforced the. >> at the office of special counsel we'll investigate, the former director of the office of ethics has failed a complaint with the office of special counsel. they will investigate. but in this case we see the violation right there on camera. you just played it. everyone can see it.
i don't see there's very much to investigate. she violated the hatch act. it's cut and dry on this point. >> and does this end up in court, or how is it finally adjudicated? >> now, the special counsel would come to its conclusions, i would hope relatively quickly because it's quite clear, and then they would inform the president. and it's up to the president to discipline an employee here. the office of specialal counsel could make a recommendation, could pressure the president to take disciplinary action. but it's going to be very hard, if president trump does not want to enforce the law, and here we have a second offense by a senior employee within less than a year, and if he doesn't want to enforce the law and fire employees who are not abiding by the law, then congress where going to have to take it up with him. and this is going be yet one more instance in which he has shown he's not fit to be
president. this has happened before with kellyanne, and the white house didn't do anything. as a matter of fact they wrote a letter to thaoffice of government of ethics saying the rules don't apply to the white house, which is very, very false. >> it seems with the white house statement being put out tonight, saying what she said was perfectly legal, that probably will be donald trump's view of it when the case gets to him if it does. professor richard painter, thank you very much for joining us. i really appreciate it. >> thank you. and tonight's last word is a very special last word about president john fits gerald kennedy who on this day in 1963 was assassinated in dallas.
on this day in 1963 the word kennedy changed its meaning from sunny optimism to tragedy. the day began with america's youngest elected president john fitzgerald waving to supporters and ending with the images of the widow bloody, grieving and bloodstained. i described what that moment felt like in my new book. in the kennedy's hometown of
boston it felt as if the world stopped. i was in st. brenden's elementary school in boston when the nones got the news the president has been killed, the first catholic president, something the older nones had never expected to see. now they had outlived the catholic boy they would so proud. they closed school early and sent us home. we had never seen them cry before. we were all crying when the nones got us into our lines to march us out to the sidewalk. everyone we saw was crying. every driver stopped at every traffic light. men carrying tool bags were cry, men carrying brief kagss were crying, subway cars were filled with people crying who had left work early to go home and cry with their families and watch the kennedy deal unfold on tv. we watched bobby holding his brother's widows hands that night when she arrived back in
washington wearing her pink bloodstained clothes. nothing could ever happen in this world to make us forget those images which were only four years old in 1967 when bobby's audiences started chanting run, bobby, run. after bobby kennedy did decide to run for president in 1968 he worried he might provoke another copycat assassin going for another kennedy. jackie kennedy was worried, too. do you know what i think will happen to bobby, she asked? the same thing that happened to jack. that's tonight's last word. "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts now.
we have news on the russia front tonight. for starters, what really happened in that oval office meeting with donald trump, the two sergeis and only russian media on hand? new details from "vanity fair" tonight on that controversial encounter. plus a one-time business associate of mike flynn now a subject of the mueller investigation. the reporter who broke that story with us tonight. and trump spent nearly five hours at his golf club today, but the white house did not want us to refer to as a low-key day for the president. "the 11th hour" on thanksgiving eve begins now. and on this wednesday night, good evening once again from our nbc headquarters here in new york. day 307 of the trump administration. and as the president begins his thanksgiving holiday, there is news tonight on key players and events in the overarching russia investigation. first, we begin with former national security advisor and retired ge