tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC November 8, 2018 9:00pm-10:00pm PST
headquarters in new york. >> happy thursday. so, for months we have been hearing about organizing efforts, about what people plan to do in case president trump took action to try to shutdown the investigation, the investigation into russian interference in his election, and the crucial question of whether his campaign was in on that foreign operation. so, for months activist groups have been openly developing a plan for there to be some sort of public response as soon as the president stopped just talking smack about that investigation and moved, instead, to take his first steps to actually curtail it. well, yesterday after the president fired the attorney
general and installed a hand-picked replacement to oversee the entire justice department, including the mueller investigation, those groups that have been musing about this possibility for months, yesterday they declared that they had reach their break glass in case of emergency moment. and so that put their long-developed plan into action for today. under the banner, protect mueller, which is the number one trending hashtag on twitter tonight and has been all night, and under the additional banner, nobody is above the law, at 5:00 p.m. local time all over the country tonight, people showed up. in new york city it was thousands of people in times square. ultimately, they marched as a group downtown towards union square. a distance of 25, 30 city blocks. the marchers apparently stretched for a dozen of hose blocks as they marched downtown. in virginia, state route 7 in virginia, talk about contrast with times square. look at this.
rural state route 7 looked like this. the sign saying truth and protect mueller. in roanoke, virginia, people marched with big banners that read, no one is above the law. protect the investigation. in kansas city, missouri, in what looks like -- looks to me like the dreaded wintry mix, snow, rain, slushy mix. ho ho, highwaey-hey, mueller ai going away. people came out in cincinnati, ohio, birmingham, alabama, people came out tonight. people gathered at thomas payne plaza in large numbers to demand that the president's hand picked appointee must be recused from the mueller investigation. he cannot be allowed to oversee it. hundreds of people turned out tonight in minneapolis where it
is heading down toward 19 degrees tonight. they decided to gather in front of the office of just unseated republican eric paulson, asking him to protect mueller. i think this is why people didn't mind the cold there tonight. no more minnesota nice. now i'm minnesota mad! people were out in places like buffalo, new york, and austin, texas, madison, wisconsin, omaha, nebraska. the protests were bigger in some cities and smaller in others. little rock, arkansas, smyrna, georgia. santa fe, new mexico. a very well done sign, mummerel is coming for you. in pits borough, north carolina, people gathered at the courthouse. more cities where this happened on zero notice, morristown, new jersey, kingston, new york.
maine. people were in the snow in minnesota tonight. warm in sunny st. petersburg, florida. all 50 states. so people out in the streets tonight, and that's asking a lot of people, right, in terms of their civic engagement just this week. just two days ago everybody had to freaking lineup to vote, take time-out of the day, in some cases take many hours out of the day to go vote on tuesday. everybody stayed up late on tuesday night watching the election returns come in. now it's just two days later. and thousands of people are out in the streets, over a thousand protests around the country? sometimes citizenship requires overtime and double shifts. but the nearness of those two civic engagements, election on tuesday and all those protests today, it is not a coincidence. the reasons why this is happening now are clear, including brand-new developments in today's news.
some of which happened very much out loud in the headlines and the press, and one big development we're going to talk about in a story that happened in a serious and sober courtroom in washington, d.c. let's talk about the out loud part first. the democratic party cleaned up tuesday night in the midterm elections. democrats appear to be on track to pick up 37 seats in the house of representatives. what people said would be the unimaginably gigantic democratic wave for this election would be 40 seats. looks like democrats are going to get 37. that is way more than usual, which democrats aren't afraid to tell you now. typical gain for the party that doesn't control the white house in the midterm election is in the low 20s in terms of the number of seats that party picks up in the house. as more and more of these close races have been called over the past couple of days and even into this evening, it is starting to look like democrats aren't going to be anywhere near the low 20s. their pick ups this election are going to be closer to 40. that's a big deal for the democratic party and the balance of power in washington.
tonight this hour, we're going to be speaking with a first-time candidate who won her election on tuesday night. she unseated an entrenched republican incumbent. she's our guest tonight live. she's going to surprise you in many ways. the democratic house chairman will be in the oversight house committee. congressman elijah cummings. i have been looking forward to talk to him when it seemed remotely possible he might become chairman of that powerful part of congress. we have both of them here on the show tonight this hour. but immediately after these election results started to become clear on tuesday night, right after the election, on wednesday morning, that is when the president fired attorney general jeff sessions, or at least secured his prearranged resignation. now, part of the reaction to that move by the president has
been a big loud counter argument today about what the president did to replace jeff sessions at the justice department might have been ill legal. that case was made in bold print today at "the new york times" by a high-profile constitutional lawyer who is former acting solicitor general of the united states, neal katyal, somebody who is reportedly to be solicitor general. george t. conway iii. he's a distinguished conservative lawyer in his own right, but he is probably best known now as the husband of white house senior advisor kellyanne conway. katyal and conway argued today while it is within the president's rights to fire attorney general jeff sessions, it's not within the president's rights to install his own random hand picked guy to take over the justice department from jeff sessions and become the acting attorney general. quote, because matthew whitaker has not undergone the process of senate confirmation, there has been no mechanism for scrutinizing whether he has the
character and ability to evenhandedly enforce the law in a position of such grave responsibility. the public is entitled to that assurance, especially since mr. whitaker's only supervisor is president trump himself. and the president is hopelessly compromised by the mueller investigation. quote, mr. trump's installation of matthew whitaker as acting attorney general of the united states is unconstitutional. it is illegal, and it means that anything mr. whitaker does or tries to do in that position is invalid. now, i am not a lawyer. do not take my advice. i couldn't get you out of a parking ticket if you got a parking ticket while you were on a pogo stick. i cannot help you. but if you want to know about the headlines, how he was able to get the election results off the front pages of newspapers across the country, if you want to know what has those 3 inch headlines and people in the streets in a protest tonight,
and serious legal minds and law enforcement veterans all saying this is the crisis we have been expecting, the reason people are freaked out is because what the president has done here, basically -- again, i'm not a lawyer, but we're seeing the arguments here, are constitutional concerns and criminal concerns. constitutionally what should have happened here, under normal circumstances, is that if the attorney general was going to quit or get fired, that should have activated the line of succession at the justice department, right? the guy who would then take over as acting attorney general for the time being would be the next in line at the justice department. the next in line, senate confirmed deputy attorney general of the united states, rod rosenstein. that did not happen. the president instead leapfrogged rosenstein, leapfrogged that chain of command and instead installed his own guy. those are basically the vastly oversimplified constitutional concerns here. but then there is also the very blunt question of obstruction of
justice, right? we have all become like mini laymen experts in the trump era. it is within any president's right to fire or demand the resignation of any cabinet off sr. including the attorney general. just like it is within his right to fire or demand the resignation of the director of the fbi, unless -- unless, of course, it turns out that the reason the president was doing either of those things was because he had a corrupt purpose in mind. he did it for the corrupt purpose of undermining a criminal investigation that he's worried my catch him or catch his family or his campaign or his administration. it's a pretty simple basic principle. the president has the right to pardon anybody in the country for any crime. but he can't do so for a corrupt purpose. he can't do so because somebody gave him a million bucks to do it, right? you can do something that's within your legal rights for a non-corrupt purpose. but as soon as you take a bribe or you do it for some other
corrupt purpose, that's no longer within your rights. the president can fire cabinet officials. he can fire the heads of agencies as long as he isn't doing so for the purpts ose of obstructing justice. that's the reason the james comey firing resulted in potential criminal obstruction of justice. did he fire comey to shut down parts of the russia investigation that threatened the president? similarly, if there is evidence that attorney general jeff sessions was fired yesterday in an effort to block the mueller investigation, in an effort to protect the president from the investigation, you can expect the sessions firing as well will ultimately come under investigation as potential criminal obstruction of justice, if it has not already. and that worry that the president might have fired attorney general jeff sessions for a corrupt purpose as part of a criminal scheme to obstruct
justice, to get rid of the mueller investigation that threatens him, that got a big boost today from the free press when multiple news outlets started going through the record of this person who the president plucked from object security and installed at the head of the justice department to replace jeff sessions. obviously from the outset it's not a normal appointment. the normal course of events would have been to allow the number two at the justice department to take the job temporarily until somebody new was appointed. he didn't do that. instead he takes this guy from outside, not a senate confirmed guy, and plopz him in the-- plo there. did he do it for a corrupt purpose? let's look at the appointment. obviously, the first thing you might ask, well, is this person qualified to do the job? he's a lawyer. he's a former u.s. attorney. the reason we have this weird video of him is because this is him promoting a neato swinging
seat that you can clip on to the outside of your hot tub. we also have this odd video of him promoting bulky plastic holders for razor blades. the reason we have this weird video of matt whitaker is because this appears to have been matt whitaker's last job before landing in the trump administration. he was on the board of an otherwise associated actively associated with a company called world patent marketing. it no longer exists. this is a company that was shutdown six months ago by the ftc as a criminally fraudulent scheme. the company was shutdown by orders of the u.s. government, and they were ordered to pay a fine. they were ordered to pay a $26 million judgment to the ftc for being a gigantic fraud scheme, which ripped off its customers to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars each. that's where matt whitaker comes from. quite recently. they paid their fine six months ago. he also made money as the sole full-time employee of something
called fact. fact was funded by, we don't know who, dark money donors only, he was the only employee. fact existed for the sole purpose of giving matt whitaker an affiliation to put under his name when he went on cable news shows and right wing talk radio to be a hillary clinton and mueller pundit. his extensive record of criticism and attacks on the mueller investigation, the president has now put him in charge of. the special counsel's investigation led by robert mueller into russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and the question of whether the trump campaign colluded in that attack. mr. whitaker has just been installed directly by president trump to oversee that investigation. mr. whitaker quite clearly is a person who has already made up his mind about the key questions at the heart of that investigation. >> i think we would know from was a smoking gun, or any gun,
or any smoke. i think we would know. i think we would know if there was evidence suggesting that there was a crime that happened here. >> let's assume that the president asked him to stop investigating flynn. that doesn't rise to the level of obstruction of justice. this idea that there was some collusion with russian nationals and even putin to interfere -- and did interfere -- with the election i think is just ludicrous based on what we know at this point. the truth is there was no collusion with the russians and the trump campaign. there is not a single piece of evidence that demonstrates that the trump campaign had any illegal or even improper relationship with the russians. it's that simple. >> clearly this is a man who has made up his mind in terms of this investigation. you know, and that's fine. it's not a criminal act to leap to your own conclusions about what the russia investigation will ultimately find. right? it's fine if you've made up your mind were it -- about it and
declared what your mind has made up about it. that's fine. unless of course you want to become the department of justice official in charge of supervising that investigation while it is ongoing. that is designed to determine whether factually those things are true. if you've decide and had declared publicly what you believe to be true, the one thing you can't do is oversee that investigation at the justice department. tapts a good punditry living but you can't run the investigation, not for u.s. law enforcement. but those comments by matt whitaker and others were dug up today by the very capable andrew kaczynski at cnn, a team of reporters at the daily beast. and hour by hour more news outlets have been turning up more comments just like these from matthew whitaker who again the president has just installed at the head of the justice department and specifically as the spv of the mueller investigation. and honestly, so we know why the president has done what he's
done, right? but there's another equity here, right? there's the justice department, and the justice department has rules that are supposed to prevent this sort of thing, right? the justice department has rules that are supposed to stop somebody wh somebody who is a declared partisan in the department of justice investigation. somebody who has determined what that should be. he is not allowed to run that investigation. they have lots of processes in place to make sure that doesn't happen. and, you know, the justice department has to still be standing when trump gets done with it. the justice department is not only staffed by donald trump appointees, it is staffed by career prosecutors and career justice department officials who are not partisans, who are not rooting for one side or the other. people whited to the marrow of their bones, the idea of impartial law enforcement in the united states that is not bent
at will by the president to serve his own needs and to let him get away with crimes. right? and then the president installs that guy to run that investigation. so here we are. we have over a thousand protests in every nook and cran i in ty including all 50 states, and he is in charge of law enforcement including the active investigation into the president that the president personally put him in charge of after this guy denounced it publicly as a lynch mob and a witch-hunt and no collusion, no collusion, lock her up. the justice department itself as an institution can't conceivably allow something like this to happen, right? i mean, this so defies not just the rules, but the very core principles of what the justice department is and why it exists. otherwise the president would just have his own police force, right? i mean, knowing what we know about the history of the justice department presumably something
breaks here in terms of this appointment as acting attorney general that the president has tried to put in place in the immediate wake of the election. specifically this, appointee being allowed to take over what the special counsel's office is investigating. and so here's one last thing that you should know. i mentioned that a whole bunch of really important stuff happened on this issue today out loud and in the press. but there is something else today that happened in court. >> the purpose of the appointment was to provide assurance to the american people that an investigation would be conducted that was sufficiently independent of the ordinary chain of command so that the united states people could have confidence in it. >> that is the voice of michael dreben who is considered to be one of the top appellate lawyers in the country. he's one of the top prosecutors working under robert mueller in the special counsel's office. mueller investigation basically went silent for a bunch of weeks ahead of this week's a elections. that is according to justice
department rules. today in court a three-judge panel and circuit court of appeals heard an argument in the mueller case. it has been brought to the court specifically to end the mueller investigation. this is a case we've talked about a few times on the show. it involves a guy who once worked for roger stone, nobody has heard of, andrew miller. i believe he is a house painter in missouri now. mr. miller was subpoenaed by the grand jury that is being run by the special counsel's office. he was subpoenaed to hand over documents and testify. he rejected the subpoena. he challenged the subpoena. he said, mueller has no authority to give him a subpoena. and they have turned his case into a legal vehicle to try to have the very appointment of robert mueller declared unconstitutional. and as i said, i'm not a lawyer, i don't know how this will go. clearly the plaintiffs here want this to go all the way to the supreme court. the lawyer for the roger stone guy spoke with reporters outside today's hearing and explained bluntly he wants this case to get to the supreme court as soon
as possible because brett kavanaugh is there and with brett kavanaugh there on the court he thinks president trump will get basically whatever he wants when it comes to limitations on the russia investigation. the court hearing today, though, was not a supreme court hearing, it was at the d.c. appeals court, one level below the supreme court. we will see if this ever gets to the supremes. but what happened today in this case, right, the day after literally a no collusion, no collusion, antihillary clinton tv pundit affiliated with a large criminal fraud scheme was installed by the president in control over the mueller investigation. one day after that guy was installed in that job, here was mueller's team. here was mueller's top appeals court prosecutor explaining today in court just how much of the work of the special counsel actually has to go through -- used to be rod rosenstein as of yesterday. now this new guy, matt whitaker. it's really one of the first
windows we've had into how the mueller team is actually supervised in the justice department and how somebody in the justice department who had authority over them might be able to try to shut them down. just the first description we've had. and we get it directly from one of the top prosecutors working mueller's case. we've got tape of it, i believe we're the first to broadcast this nationwide. the first voice you're going to hear here is one of the judges on this three-judge panel. the person who answers the questions is michael dreben from the special counsel's office. >> ask you questions about the constitutional question, the way supervision is exercised? so, there is the provision that talks about the attorney general finding that something the special counsel wants to do is so inappropriate or unwarranted under established department practices it should not be pursued. >> correct. >> do you understand that to mean that if the attorney general makes that seam assessment, the special counsel can't take the step? >> we do.
>> if the attorney general makes the assessment, decides something is inappropriate or unwarranted, then the special counsel can't take that step? yes. michael dreben from the special counsel's office, mueller's office saying bluntly to the court the special counsel's office can't do what it wants. if the acting attorney general tells them, no, what you're doing is inappropriate or unwarranted under establishment -- excuse me, under established justice department practices, then that acting attorney general can stop mueller from doing anything. and, of course, yesterday president trump just installed a new acting attorney general. >> the special counsel has a regular reporting obligation to the acting attorney general in order to maintain the acting attorney general's ultimate accountability for the investigation. that's one of the twin purposes of the regulation. ultimate accountability in the attorney general day to day independence of the special counsel. we are therefore, required to submit reports to the acting attorney general in accordance with the department of justice's
urgent report guidelines, which, without going into all their detail, ensure that major events and investigations are reported up the chain of command so that supervisory officials in the department are aware of them. the regulations also specifically provide that the acting attorney general can ask the special counsel for an explanation of any investigatory step. so he's aware of what we're doing and he can ask for an explanation of it. it's not that the special counsel is off wandering in a free floating environment and can decide when to report. there is a reporting obligation -- >> he is aware of what we're doing and he can ask for an explanation for it. there is a reporting obligation. top prosecutor from mueller's office saying that all major events in the special counsel's office investigation, all major stuff has to be reported up the chain of command. so that supervisory officials in the department are aware of those major events. ultimate accountability lies in the attorney general, in this case the acting attorney
general. this is why it is such a big deal that president trump has just installed his new hand picked guy who is an avowed enemy of mueller's investigation to be the guy in charge of mueller's investigation. >> but if the acting attorney general concludes in words that afford him a fair amount of discretion that an action is so inappropriate, to a degree of inappropriateness or unwarranted, that it shall not be pursuit, he can step in and say otherwise. >> so it's not, then, it triggers a reporting obligation on the part of the attorney general that reported it. >> that's right. >> the attorney general can prevent the action from happening? >> that is our understanding of the regulations, the preamble to the regulations makes clear that that is part of the arsenal of powers that the acting attorney general has. >> it's not just that they have to report if they do something. they can actually stop you from doing it. the arsenal of powers that the acting attorney general has are
the kinds of powers one would not expect the justice department to allow to be placed into the hands of somebody who is completely personally compromised when it comes to overseeing an investigation of the president. but the president is trying it. and that's why there were a thousand protests in all 50 states across the country tonight. this is what we've been waiting for. it turns out to be a test for the country, turns out to be a test, first and foremost, of the justice department. what are they going to do here? congressman elijah cummings joins us next. you do, too, but not in time. hey, no big deal. you've got a good record and liberty mutual won't hold a grudge by raising your rates over one mistake. you hear that, karen? liberty mutual doesn't hold grudges. how mature of them! for drivers with accident forgiveness,
liberty mutual won't raise their rates because of their first accident. liberty mutual insurance. liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ take prilosec otc and take control of heartburn. so you don't have to stash antacids here.... here... or here. kick your antacid habit with prilosec otc. one pill a day, 24 hours, zero heartburn. hi susan!hs) honey? i respect that. but that cough looks pretty bad... try this new robitussin honey. the real honey you love... plus the powerful cough relief you need. mind if i root through your trash? new robitussin honey. because it's never just a cough.
overnight a small army of senior administration officials received this rather sobering letter. varied a little bit from agency to agency. this is the one that went to the white house counsel. quote, we ask that you confirm that the white house has preserved all materials related to any investigations by the special counsel's office, including any related investigations conducted by any component of the justice department. quote, we also ask that you preserve all materials related to the departure of attorney
general jeff sessions. we remind you -- helpful reminder. we remind you that concealing, removing or destroying such records may constitute a crime. may result in the immediate disqualification from holding a position in the federal government, and may be punishable by up to three years imprisonment by federal law. have a nice day. sincerely, elijah cummings. the top democrat on the oversight committee and other top democrats who will be taking over powerful oversight committees come january now that the democrats have won the house. joining us now is congressman elijah cummings of maryland. he is the top democrat on the oversight committee. congressman, sir, it is really nice to have you here this evening. thank you for making the time. >> i'm honored to be here. >> first of all, i should say congratulations on your win on tuesday. i know you were reelected in a land slide. obviously your party also takes control in the house. what should the american people expect from you if and when you are now set to ascend to run the
oversite committee in the house? it is a very, very powerful position. >> they should expect us to do what they have basically told us to do by the numbers that were voted in on the democratic side. what they are asking for is transparency in their government. they are asking for honesty. and they are asking the congress to simply do its job under the constitution. they understand that every two years we swear to uphold the constitution of the united states of america, and part of that, rachel, of that oath is about the business of being a check on the executive branch. they should expect that. and i promise you, they will get that. >> you and your colleagues sent what amounted to a very stern preservation notice to the white house counsel's office and to lots of other government agencies that may have come into contact with the special counsel's office at some point during the investigation.
everything from the fbi to the cia to the nsa to the treasury department to the irs. why did you send that preservation notice today? are you concerned that evidence may be at risk? >> i am extremely concerned about evidence being at risk, rachel. keep in mind that over the year and a half or so that president trump has been in office, we in the oversight committee, the democrats have asked the republicans to help us get documents so that we could do what the constitution says we are supposed to do, have oversight. you cannot do oversight without information. they have basically refused to issue subpoenas, and they -- not only that, not only have they been aiders and abetters to this president, they have gone so far as to act as his defense counsel. so we want to make sure that the evidence is preserved.
keep in mind, we don't take over until january. in the meantime, we want to make sure everything stays intact so that we can do the appropriate investigations. >> if you discover, once you do have the gavel in january, if you discover retroactively that records were destroyed, either during the previous congress or during this lame duck period, would you expect to pursue that potentially as a criminal matter, at least a point of investigation? >> i would think it would be legislative malpractice ton pursue it as a criminal matter. as a matter of fact, we would be obligated to turn that information over to the justice department. now, what the justice department will do once they get it is a whole 'nother thing. we hope they would do what they deem to be appropriate and fair. we have no choice. we have to turn it -- we'll have to turn that over. >> congressman, there are reports today that nancy pelosi, the democratic leader, today
scheduled an emergency call with her caucus to discuss the president firing attorney general jeff sessions yesterday and installing a hand-picked acting attorney general who has never gone through senate confirmation, who has nevertheless been put in charge of the mueller investigation. and who has been a very controversial choice on the mueller investigation specifically because of his many public comments disparaging the investigation saying how he thinks it should go. i know you and your fellow incoming chairman were invited to brief other democratic house members during that call. can you share with us what those discussions are like within your caucus right now and what you plan to do, if anything, about this new controversial act by the president? >> first of all, i was very proud that we had almost our entire caucus, including the new members who haven't even been sworn in yet, to be on that call. basically what i told them is that we must act with the urgency of now. that mr. whitaker is not the
person who should be sitting in the acting attorney general spot because -- i referenced back in june of 2017, mr. whitaker said that there was no evidence here for a case -- basically condemned the special prosecutor. that was a month after he was appointed. a few weekends later, he said that no lawyer would bring a case like this. then in august -- this is 2017 now. and back in 2017 he called the special prosecutor's office a lynch mob. those words sound kind of interesting. the fact is he did. my point is if he had already judged this situation, rachel, before he even knew the facts. the special prosecutor had just gotten started, and that's why we had been insisting, and i
agree with speaker leader pelosi he should recuse himself. to be frank with you, i'm shocked he has not already recused himself. most lawyers in this situation would voluntarily say, you know what? i don't even want to have the appearance of a conflict. yet he is the absolute wrong person to have in this position. we again will gather our information. we'll probably have hearings. we'll do our investigations and see what comes of them. >> congressman elijah cummings of maryland who is the top democrat in the oversight committee slated to be chairman of that committee when the democrats take the gavel in just a few weekends. sir, thank you for being here tonight, and i hope we can stay in touch as you ascend to this very, very important position. you will be in a almost unique position in terms of your oversight role, sir, and we'd love to stay apprised of your work. thank you. >> rachel, i appreciate that and i want to say to your audience,
we had to fight for the soul of our democracy. we have to fight for it every day. thank you very much. >> congressman elijah cummings. all right. we'll be right back. thank you. take your razor, yup. alright, up and down, never side to side, shaquem. you got it? come on, get back. quem, you a second behind your brother, stay focused. can't nobody beat you, can't nobody beat you. hard work baby, it gonna pay off. you got this. with the one hundred and forty-first pick, the seattle seahawks select. alright, you got it, shaquem. alright, let me see. but allstate helps you. with drivewise. feedback that helps you drive safer. and that can lower your cost now that you know the truth... are you in good hands?
newcomer katie hill over republican steve knight in california. in washington state, dino ross ee has conceded to democratic candidate kim schrier. that flips the seat from red to blue. we learned lucy mcbeth has defeated congresswoman karen handel in preemie iously red atlanta. there's a bunch of them still too close to call. nbc news reports tonight democrats have definitely picked up 30 seats in the house, but there are a million votes still to be counted. in the senate, tons of drama. in the arizona senate seat that was left open by republican jeff flake retiring there, there are still half a million ballots to count just in that one senate race. as of tonight, the democratic candidate for that senate seat, democrat kyrsten sinema has pulled ahead by almost 11,000 votes. if her lead holds, that would
give democrats a second red to blue flip in the senate after the flip they already got with dean heller's seat in nevada. we are also watching dramatic statewide races in florida and georgia. we'll have more on that craziness coming up in is a few minutes. before we do that, i want to introduce you to somebody on the show tonight who could credibly claim to have pulled off, if not the most surprising win in the election, definitely one of them. i don't know if she thinks of it that way. she seems way too confident for that, but you are going to enjoy meeting her. that's next.
whooo! want to get a move on your next vacation? tripadvisor now lets you book over a hundred thousand tours, attractions, and experiences in destinations around the world! like new orleans! from cooking classes, to airboat tours, tripadvisor makes it easy to find and book amazing things to do. and you can cancel most bookings up to 24 hours in advance for a full refund. so your whole trip... will be smooth sailing! read reviews check hotel prices book things to do tripadvisor
before she puts them in the dishwasher. so what does the dishwasher do? (vo) cascade platinum does the work for you. prewashing and removing stuck-on foods, the first time. (mom) wow! that's clean! (vo) cascade platinum. if democrats wanted any chance of flipping congressional seats in a deep red state like kansas, they were going to need a fighter. they found one. this is sherisse davids. a former mixed martial arts fighter, going to law school at cornell. she would drive 90 minutes every day to go train. on the way she would listen to her law school classes on tape. sherisse davids is native
american. she's a member of the hochunk nation. after she graduated from law school at cornell, she went to live and work on native american reservations to help out under served communities. she eventually found her way to the white house when she was chosen in 2016 for the highly selective white house fellowship program. she found that she liked working in politics when she got back home to kansas, she started keeping an eye on her local congressman, a man named kevin yoder. congressman yoder has been a fixture in kansas republican politics. he served a red district and an even redder state, and he's never really had a challenge across eight years and four elections. he has just glided to victory again and again and again always by big double digit margins. but sherisse davids looked at the job that he was doing for kansas and she thought that maybe she could do it better. >> this is a tough place to be a woman. i've been put down, pushed aside, knocked out.
truth is, i've had to fight my whole life because of who i am, who i love, and where i started. but i didn't let anything get in my way. still, it's 2018 and women, native americans, gay people, the unemployed and under employed have to fight like hell just to survive. and it's clear, trump and the republicans in washington don't give a -- about anyone like me or anyone that doesn't think like them. enough. that's why i'm running for congress. >> the single-most reserved staffer on the rachel maddow show, a person who is incapable of hyperbole came to me after that ad was first posted and said, i've never used the word epic to describe something in our news gathering process before. but i'd like you to look at this. i find it fairly epic. fair enough. tuesday night sherisse davids, the democratic fighter
running for congress from kansas, the democrat in a sea of red, she beat four-term republican congressman kevin yoder in kansas and she didn't just beat him. she trounced him by more than nine points. that veasey davids is only 37 years old. before now she had never run for public office. she now shares the honor of being the first native american woman being elected to the house of representatives alongside deb holland from new mexico. sharice davids is the first openly gay person to be elected from not just her kansas district, but from any district in kansas. man, is there a story of this election? don't you want to meet congresswoman elect sherisse davids? she joins us next. how about using that pen to sign up for new insurance instead? for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise their rates because of their first accident. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ i'm a musician about to embark on a concert tour,r. with the majority of which will be down south. atlantic city? the deep south.
this thanksgiving... in the deep south, there's gonna be problems. when you see me worried... tony. you'll know if i'm worried. how about some quiet time. it's amazing you said that, my wife used to say that all the time. their journey inspired an unexpected friendship. i don't think i ever met anyone with your appetite. [ laughing ] and everyone i've ever opioloved away from me.thing
everything. i blew my ankle out and i got prescribed pain pills by my doctor. if making my detox public is gonna help somebody i'm all for it. i just wish i would've had a warning. opportunlike here.rywhere. and here. see? opportunity. ev-er-y-where. about to be parents. meeting the parents. and this driver, logging out to watch his kid hit one out of the... (bat hits ball) opportunity is everywhere. all you have to do to find it is get out...here. ♪ means they won't hike your rates over one mistake. see, liberty mutual doesn't hold grudges. for drivers with accident forgiveness,
when you make history, all at once in more ways than one, the headlines about you get long. so they look like this. sherisse davids makes history: kansas' first gay rep, first native american woman in congress. joining us now, sherisse david, congresswoman elect from the great state of kansas. miss davids, thank you very much for joining us tonight and congratulations. >> thank you, thank you. i'm happy to be here. >> so, i have been telling the story of your somewhat remarkable victory. obviously you're a lot of firsts here. never a native american woman, your district has been under republican control for like a decade. what made you decide to do this and what made you think you could win?
>> well, you know, i think that at the core of what helped me feel empowered to do this was that i knew my community could do so much more and have a much stronger voice in washington, d.c. than what we had with congressman yoder. and, you know, starting off at johnson county community college right here in our community and making my way to cornell for law school, i mean, so much of the opportunity i had in my life stemmed from the support i've had here and having a strong public education foundation and all of those things combined just led me to take the leap because i knew that we could do so much better than what we had. >> you're a trail blazer, not only for winning, but for getting the nomination in the first place. you're a trail blazer even within the democratic party. correct me if i'm wrong, but i think you had to beat out like
five other democrats in this primary. what was that process like? >> yeah. >> in terms of integrating yourself into the existing democratic party, figuring out how to best strategize against your fellow democrats? was there a unification effort after that hard-fought primary? >> yeah, so there was a unification effort. we had a couple of unity rallies right after and wanted to make sure that even though, you know, our community had never seen a six-way primary before, that ultimately our goal was to make sure that everyone came together for whoever ended up being the nominee. and really, my approach was not necessarily one of competing with the other candidates, but rather trying to make sure that our message of, one, making sure everybody has the same kind of opportunity that i know i had from this community. and, two, making sure people knew what we were fighting for.
our campaign tried really, really hard to talk to as many people as possible about wanting to make sure that everybody had access to affordable quality health care, making sure that we sent somebody to washington, d.c. who really cared about public education, about campaign finance reform, and that was really the focus of what we were doing. >> obviously, coming from the district and having grown up there and knowing what it's like, i can tell from the way that you're talking about it that you're focused on constituent services and what you want to be able to do for the district. what you think congressman yoder wasn't able to do. but i think it's also obvious that you're going to have a big national spotlight on you because of how big a win this was, because you flipped this district, because of who you are, because of how you won. what are your goals for washington, for your first term? you're going to get a lot of attention and you're probably going to have your pick of the litter in terms of what you want to tackle first. >> well, certainly i want to be
able to work on -- health care was the biggest issue that i heard from people about the entire time i was on the campaign trail. and so, you know, that means that that has to be a big part of what i focus on. you know, the folks here in the third district are really concerned about making sure that we send somebody to washington, d.c. who is taking our voice and our values there. and that means being pragmatic. that means trying to figure outweighs that we can build some kind of bipartisan change. so those are the kinds of things i want to focus on. and then, you know, as far as the attention, i think i'm just really happy to see that kansas is in the news for positive change making because we are often, unfortunately, known for folks like sam brownback and chris koback.
and this has been an amazing opportunity for people to see the positive things kansas has to offer. >> sherisse davids, congresswoman elect from the great state of kansas and as of now the most famous politician in the state of kansas. you're doing your part. good luck to you. stay in touch. >> thanks so much. have a good night. >> you, too. we'll be right back. -these people, they speak a language we cannot understand. ♪ [ telephone ringing ] -whoa. [ indistinct talking ] -deductible? -definitely speaking insurance.
-additional interest on umbrella policy? -can you translate? -damage minimization of civil commotion. -when insurance needs translating, get answers in plain english at progressiveanswers.com. ♪ -he wants you to sign karen's birthday card. it's a high honor. -he wants you to sign karen's birthday card. - anncr: as you grow older, -your brain naturally begins to change which may cause trouble with recall. - learning from him is great... when i can keep up! - anncr: thankfully, prevagen helps your brain and improves memory. - dad's got all the answers. - anncr: prevagen is now the number-one-selling brain health supplement in drug stores nationwide. - she outsmarts me every single time. - checkmate! you wanna play again?
- anncr: prevagen. healthier brain. better life. hi susan!hs) honey? i respect that. but that cough looks pretty bad... try this new robitussin honey. the real honey you love... plus the powerful cough relief you need. mind if i root through your trash? new robitussin honey. because it's never just a cough. into your own little world.k especially these days. (dad) i think it's here. (mom vo) especially at this age. (big sister) where are we going? (mom vo) it's a big, beautiful world out there. (little sister) woah... (big sister) wow. see that? (mom vo) sometimes you just need a little help seeing it. (vo) presenting the all-new three-row subaru ascent. love is now bigger than ever. word" with lawrence o'donnell. lawrence, didn't i miss your birthday?