tv The 11th Hour With Brian Williams MSNBC March 22, 2019 8:00pm-9:00pm PDT
>> and the president specifically includeded with vad mere putin by coming out and saying publicly, i believe vladimir putin when he says the russians did not interfere. >> absolutely. >> in our election at all. >> that is public collusion that the president engages in, trying to help the vladimir putin and russian cover-up of what our intelligence agencies say they did do during that election campaign. we're going to have to leave it there. thank you for joining us on our special coverage tonight. that is tonight's last word. "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts now. the breaking news tonight, robert mueller's work is done. the findings of his russia investigation have been handed over to the attorney general. bill bar has notified congress, he may share some of the most basic details as early as this weekend. tonight we'll take on the flood of questions now, including what this means for the 45th president who's watching it all
from florida. what does it mean for the other investigations now that this one is over. what about the central question mueller was hired to find out about, russia's role in the 2015 presidential election. the 11th hour gets underway on this friday night. welcome once again from our nbc news headquarters in new york. day 792 of the trump administration, as of 5:00 p.m. eastern time today, the mueller investigation is over. that's when word arrived that robert mueller had transmitted his report to attorney general bill bar after 675 days of work. according to a senior justice department official, mueller for his part is not recommendation any further indictments. earlier tonight the justice department said the attorney
general to decide how much of this report will become public. we know mueller and rod rosenstein will be assisting him during the process of going through the report. we learned that in a letter barr sent to leaders of both the house and senate judiciary committee today. i am reviewing the report and anticipate i may be in a position to advise you of the special counsel's 3ri7bs pell conclusions as early as this weekend. i intend to consult with rosenstein and special counsel mumer to determine what other information can be released to congress and the public consistent with the law, including the special counsel regulations. and the department's longstanding practices and policies. i remain committed to as much transparency as possible. >> so far there hasn't been much reaction from the white house, on the mueller report, the
president is spending the weekend at his resort in florida. press secretary sarah huckabee sanders posted this statement. the next steps are up to attorney general barr and we look forward to the process, taking its course. the white house has not received or been briefed on the special counsel's report. here is a quick recap of what mueller has accomplished in his nearly two-year long investigation. he has secured guilty pleas for seven individuals including the president's former personal attorney michael cohen. his former national security adviser michael flynn. his former campaign chairman paul manafort. on top of that, another 27 people have been indicted including dozens of russians. . indictments in all. without delay, let's bring in our leadoff panel on a momentous friday night, starting with a former acting solicitor general during the obama administration. he happens to be a veteran of the justice department, where he
drafted the special counsel reges under which mueller was appointed. he will be of counsel to us around here as our newest msnbc analyst. nicolle wallace, host of "deadline white house" 4:00 p.m. eastern time each day on this network. and robert costa. national political reporter of the washington post. welcome to you. i'd like to begin with you, the lawyer and journalist ben wittis wrote tonight, what is ending here is not the investigation. merely the portion of the investigation mueller chose to retain for himself. neil, do you agree with that assessment? >> 100% today what happened is, the end of the beginning of the investigation. not the beginning of the end. so there's a lot that's left. think about mueller running a relay race, he's got the baton.
he learns about campaign finance violations and all sorts of other things, instead of doing that himself. he's now passing that baton on to other people. the southern district federal prosecutors in new york. the state attorney general of new york, as well as members of congress and their own committees investigating a whole variety of things, what happens today is the close of one chapter of a much larger story. based on my reading today, what could bog this down is the attorney general going through this is trying to decide not to expose sources and methods and secrets, trying to decide what can be made public to which audience and when. is there any chance mueller would send two versions or a prescrubbed version with kind of exhibits over to the side to
speed this process? >> sometimes that happens. no one will deny if there's sources and methods in either version of the mueller report, that is not something the american public should see. that's a really narrow limited exception. and federal governments are very good at using redactions and other things to accomplish that purpose. what i think will not stand is if barr says i'm not turning over the mueller report to congress, and to the american people. that is, the questions of this report go to the central questions of our democracy, and whether or not our most powerful leaders are compromised, mueller's already found the inner circle of trump in the campaign was plagued with people who were in cahoots with russia or were lying or foreign lobbyists and not disclosing it, his inner circle outside of the campaign, people like michael cohen, his personal fixer or national security adviser all
going to prison and admitting that they've committed felonies. >> if this is it from the american people. i think that would be a crime against the american people. >> nicolle wallace, you've been through this 675 day long looking glass. what stands out at you as we look at it through the rearview mirror tonight. >> as it ends, i can't stop thinking about how it began. i can't help thinking about that 9-day appointment when robert mueller was appointed. that firing wasn't what we thought it was. through so much of our coverage of the mueller investigation. it wasn't just perhaps an effort to obstruct the investigations. it wasn't just about the president's peak, the russia
probe and thinking about what he said to our colleague, lester holt. it was in that moment that andrew mccabe decided to enter a full field investigation into the president. what robert mueller absorbed in the may hem between the firing of jim comey and the appointment of rod he rosenstein, wasn't just a question about whether the president was obstructing justice, it wasn't just that looming question about russian meddling, wasn't just whether the trump campaign was in cahoots, whether they were including, and as a matter of sort of correcting the record that's already coming out, he did prove that there was contact and coordination at the highest levels of the trump campaign between its chairman and paul manafort and a putin aligned -- it was this question about who donald trump was loyal, to whether he was wittingly or unwittingly working on behalf of the russians.
it would sort of make sense that there aren't any more indictments from the mueller probe, but i think those questions are at the heart of these sort of probing inquiries into what we will see, and it will be the most sensitive part of that investigation. but on a national security front, perhaps it's most important. >> robert costa, the president tonight is inside the warm bath of approval known as mar-a-lago. we've already seen headlines on fox news tonight. one in the last hour read, doj: no additional mueller indictments. absolutely correct, but neil pointed out what there could be, what are you hearing from republicans around the president, robert? >> there may be a celebration in florida tonight. but in call after call with my top republican sources, an air of apprehension pervades this republican party. uncertainty about what's coming
next, there may not be indictments on the horizon, they know they're not fully in control. house democrats now have subpoena power, will pressure the justice department to release this report to the public. they are uncertain about the president's conduct. what about possible obstruction of justice will be detailed, the president loves to say, no collusion, but republicans feel vulnerable tonight about what obstruction of justice if any, is detailed in this report, what that could mean to the party in its agenda as it moves forward. >> join us in listening to what donald trump said about the dismissal of mr. comey. >> you had made the decision before they came in the room? >> i was going to fire comey. there's no good time to do it, by the way. they -- >> because in your letter, you said, i accepted their recommendation. >> yeah, well, they also -- >> you had already made the decision. >> i was going to fire regardless of recommendation.
he's highly respected. very good guy, very smart guy. the democrats like him, the republicans like him. regardless of recommendation i was going to fire comey. knowing there was no good time to do it. and, in fact, when i decided to do, i said to myself, i said, you know, this russia thing with trump and russia is a made up story, it's an excuse by the democrats for having lost an election. that they should have won. >> the mueller team never had that opportunity to sit across from that man and ask him questions. he got the take home test version instead. would this case have been adjudicated differently, would it have ended differently tonight if he had had the opportunity to be questioned one on one? >> might be, we don't know how it's ending, we don't know the report, i think the one thing we do know. republicans are apprehensive about what the report's going to say about president trump. if you want to know why, that
tape is a perfect illustration of it, even the most die hard republicans know this is a president who bends the truth at every turn and has no respect for the rule of law. and nicole and i had the privilege of working for two different presidents, very different, obama and george w. bush, but i think nobody would ever think that there's -- there would be ridiculously unfathomable to think that anyone could accuse these two men of being in cahoots with russia or having their campaign aides in cahoots. when president obama walked in, everyone stood up a little taller. he inspired us to be better. and i know that's true about george w. bush too. that's not true about this president. there will be attempts to try to suppress the report from the american people. >> there's a possible political war on the horizon. talking to top republicans like mayor giuliani today. he was chuckling in a phone interview, waiting for the mueller report is almost like
waiting for a baby to be born. then his tone changed. he had sharp words for the justice department. a counter report is ready on the trump legal team side of things to prepare to go after each and every point this report may have. and so that's what the president who's been trying to erode trust in the justice department for over a year, in tweet after tweet, statement after statement, that war is only beginning, as much as the mueller report is only beginning its journey to the congress, to the public. so too are the political battles. >> nicole, on the political side of things, that goes right to the base, and everybody stays in their partisan bubbles? >> we'll see, this is a republican party led by men who were front and center with very strong words and very o strong opinions about obstruction of justice when the president in question was bill clinton, took me three minutes to put together five minutes of those men screaming at the top of their lungs about what bill clinton's actions made up part of his impeachment proceedings meant.
to see all those men eat their words for breakfast, lunch and dinner will be amusing to me as someone who bee moans the death of the modern republican party. on the obstruction question, none of us knows what's in the mueller report. neither does rudy giuliani, neither does this white house. we do know the president attempted to obstruct justice, and robert mueller investigated all those actions, the attempted firing of robert mueller, the efforts to get jeff sessions to unrecuse. chuck rosenberg our colleague says that's not even a thing, unrecusal. robert mueller assembled and tried to put together the tweets, the public statements. donald trump went to the rose garden and attacked jeff sessions for recusing. there's a vast body of attempt to obstruct this investigation. when you see republicans saying, well, robert mueller finished. that in my understanding, is not an exoneration from the crime of
obstruction. there are also open questions about whether tlds some exposure around witness tampering, this republican party is going to have to decide if they still care about criminal conduct. >> neil, is it possible that mueller could come of -- to some of the few things nicolle just listed and say something akin to this area, i thought it best adjudicated by congress? >> absolutely. i mean, i think that's often what happens in impeachment, and that's the way our system works, it works for a good reason, some of this really bad conduct is not criminal. some can be. but other things like mueller basically proved that trump lied to the american people before the 2016 election by saying, i have no business dealings with russia. we now know that not to be true, because of the investigation. that's not a crime, but boy, that is something that is a real betrayal of the american people's trust, impeachment
often is the right remedy constitution ali speaking, when you have allegations like that. >> counselor, just one more to put a finer point on this, it is possible. it remains possible for all the people who have come in from the day, they've seen a headline or two on their devices, there are going to be no further indictments, that refers to the mueller piece of this. the southern district of new york, the justice department's office in new york, the eastern district of virginia, could drop what they want and what they have at any time. >> exactly. soy think the way to think about it is much more like the internet now, the mueller investigation, with multiple different nodes and each one having a certain amount of autonomy that's true for the state prosecutors, which have -- the president and the attorney general can't stop. and congress, which is a coordinated branch of government, when you get to the southern district of new york or the eastern district of virginia, those are federal prosecutors and it's possible to envision donald trump or
attorney general barr saying, oh, no, you can't investigate any further, don't touch my man. the folks watching this network know the news hit at the end of nicolle wallace's broadcast, and at the very start of chuck todd's "meet the press daily." they happened to be seated side by side in our washington studios. we watched that unfold live. cnn had its own breaking news coverage. nicolle, i wanted to show you, because you were otherwise busy, how the moment transpired on fox news this afternoon. we'll talk about it on the other side. >> we've just been told the mueller report has been delivered to the attorney general william barr, we don't know any details as yet, and we don't know when we'll know any of the details, whether it will be a matter of hours, days, weeks, months, we don't know. >> mueller took too long, he lost all his momentum, it's kind
of like the guy at the bbq, when you invite everyone over at 5:00, and at 7:00 no one's eaten yet, and he burns the meat. you say, i waited two years for this, this is terrible. i don't think the rest of the country outside of the swamp and the partisans really care about the mueller report. they care about the brackets for the ncaa, they care about spring vacation and what's on netflix. >> nicolle wallace? >> i learned at the very beginning of my career in politics, never to treat voters like they're stupistupid, i don know who that guy was. and i don't watch fox news any more. but to treat voters as stupid is cynical. i think it probably works for a segment of the population that donald trump already has locked and loaded. this isn't about them. we have to be careful not to lay over too much politics. we don't know what he found. there are really serious
questions, we should give voters and viewers credit for caring about whether or not their president -- he could have unwittingly been acting as a russian agent. i think every voter, whether or not it changes their political persuasi persuasion, how they vote in the next election, i don't know. i think we should give our viewers and voters credit for wanting to know the answers to those kinds of questions. >> neil you're nodding, someone at doj said what they did know was that the mueller report was comprehensive. doj knows from comprehensive, this could be a very very vo luminous document. >> first, i want to echo what nicole said, it brings pride to my eyes to hear someone say that, because i do think that is our fundamental responsibility, which is to try to give viewers and the american public an education about what's in this report and what's likely to come. now, we're hearing that this report is comprehensive, i don't
know what comprehensive means, it means different things to different people. it sounds like there's going to be a substantial amount of detail in this report. equally fitting for the american public to see that report for the reasons nicole was talking about earlier. >> robert costa, your job is the world between and including law and politics. and to nicole's comments, it would be a good time for everybody to try to keep their powder dry. >> so far the mueller investigation has had its ups and downs, in alexandria's court, we've seen him be critical of the mueller probe. what matters now is the facts. what are the facts with the president's conduct. the american people, reporters, everyone who just wants to know the truth and the facts. everyone from fox news to other commentators, they will have their opinions about this, at the end of thedy, if you're a reporter or a citizen, you want to know what happened? what was the intent, was it corrupt or not? and know the time line and the
context. that's what matters. that's why this investigation is so important. >> bob, a serious question about a not always serious medium, can the president continue to show discipline on social media tonight? we have not heard comment one from him. he had dinner with his family, we're told, he stopped by a gop fund-raiser as well. nothing on twitter. >> based on my conversations tonight with white house officials and trump advisers, they're bracing for that political war. they expect nothing in terms of discipline or control with the president's tweets. the acting chief of staff, mick mulvaney, mr. giuliani, none of them are prepared to reign the president in, they expect this president to be fighting day in and day out. this is going to overhaul the congressional front this is going to change the rest of 2019 and the 2020 presidential race. a pivot point in the trump presidency tonight. >> we underscore this news about the mueller report, is six hours
and 21 minutes old. that's also evidence it's been a long day. our thanks to neal, nicolle, robert costa, we appreciate the three of you starting off our broadcast for us tonight. when we continue, with mueller's job now done. we have more on where it will all go from here. and later, the national security risks that prompted the russia investigation in the first place. and the threats that still exist. the 11th hour just getting started on a critical friday night. ♪
turn up your swagger game with one a day gummies. one serving... ...once a day... ...with nutrients that support 6 vital functions... ...and one healthy you. that's the power of one a day. when did you see the sign? when i needed to jumpstart sales. build attendance for an event. help people find their way. fastsigns designed new directional signage. and got them back on track. get started at fastsigns.com. sometimes, bipolar i disorder makes you feel and got them back on track. like you can do it all. but mania, such as unusual changes in your mood, activity or energy levels, can leave you on shaky ground. help take control by asking your healthcare provider about vraylar. vraylar treats acute mania of bipolar i disorder. vraylar significantly reduces overall manic symptoms,...
...and was proven in adults with mixed episodes who have both mania and depression. vraylar should not be used in elderly patients with dementia, due to increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about fever, stiff muscles, or confusion, which may mean a life-threatening reaction or uncontrollable muscle movements, which may be permanent. side effects may not appear for several weeks. high cholesterol; weight gain; high blood sugar and decreased white blood cells, both of which can be serious or fatal;... ...dizziness upon standing; falls; seizures; impaired judgment; heat sensitivity; and trouble swallowing may occur. ask if vraylar can help you get on track.
we're back, 25 after the hour, the mueller investigation is over it will shift to other investigations and to congress. the first priority on the hill is to make sure the report is released to the public as evidences by the flurry of calls late today. there are four separate house and senate committee investigations into this president. and his dealings, currently underway. the chairs of two of those committees hinted tonight at what is next. >> the attorney general committed to making as much of it public as was consistent with policy. if he's true to that, it it means the entire thing. the congress is going to need the underlying evidence. some of that evidence may go to the compromise of the president or people around him. that poses a real threat to our national security. >> the mueller report concerns only crimes that may have been committed. our constitutional mandate is to
look at -- is to maintain the rule of law, which means examining not only crimes, but other abuses of power. and instructions of justice. >> again, there are active investigations in the southern district of new york. and the new york attorney general. and the u.s. attorneys in the district of columbia and the commonwealth of virginia. with us to talk about all of it, jeremy bash, former chief of staff at cia and pentagon, former chief counsel intel. joyce vance who spent 25 years as a federal prosecutor. and frank figluzzi, fbi, assistant director for counter intelligence. i'm going to ask you all the same questions so fair warning. what was the biggest moment or revelation. do any of you have a lingering question from today that you would like answered?
and home field advantage being what it is, counselor, joyce, you go first. >> i think the most significant thing we learned today there had been no request from bob mueller that was denied. no request to indict. that was important for the attorney general to say. but with that said, there are an enormous number of lingering questions. so many loose ends for this investigation. both those that involve russia and other cases. this is unlike any other special counsel case. there are lingering investigations all over the country and on the hill. more questions left to ask than have been answered. >> jeremy bash, same question. >> it was significant to me, there is a report that there is detail in bob mueller's
findings, he's presented that to the attorney general. i think it's up to the attorney general to disclose that report to the american people. it's going to be a very unsatisfactory investigation. if the attorney general handpicked by donald trump, tries to shield these findings from the congress and the american people. >> frank, same question. >> the mystery is not yet solved, the giggest revelation today, no more indictments as has been reported. the mystery that remains, the gap in our knowledge, where we go from here with seeming loose ends that have not yet wrapped up. >> frank, we'll start a different vein here, mueller found a way to -- we learned the term, speaking indictment thanks to all of our friends on this broadcast. over the last 675 days of covering this.
he found a way, and his prosecutors of telling the story. as it rolled on in realtime. much of what we know is thanks to the court papers that came out. can that still exist in this report. we're poking around in the dark without having seen anything? >> there's conjecture today running amok. let me add to it. we've heard the story told as segments in a season on netflix as to what's happening. he's talked through detailed indictments. what if he employs that same strategy in his report. what if he explains to us why he did not ask to indict the president, but rather says, i found all of this stuff, it's damning, it's bordering on criminal conspiracy, i think he's compromised.
and the purpose of it really is to begin impeachment proceedings. is that what the congress will take away and say, you didn't indict, you couldn't indict. but now we have this evidence to move forward with possible impeachment? >> is that in the realm of the possible that he would think of how much they have hoovered up into this investigation? is it possible that he and his folks would say, they didn't think they had the proper resolution or the proper tools that this was better handled by congress, but here's what we found? >> it's unlikely that mueller will get into congress's lane and tell congress what to do, but i think it's very reasonable to believe he'll give us some form of speaking declarations, and explain why he didn't think the evidence warranted a criminal indictment, we know at the end of the clinton investigation for prudential reasons, starr declined to
indict president clinton over potential perjury charges. we may find something like that from mueller, and he's developed this great body of evidence that the congress can use for whatever they think is appropriate. >> help me underscore this report, it could be absolutely sprouling. it could be monumental and it could contain language that will surprise all of us tonight who will look back on this broadcast on the friday we got the report. and will marvel at how little we knew. >> i think bob mueller's going to be able to peace together for us, the extent to which our president, our presidency and ultimately american foreign policy is under the influence -- how the president took a candidate, a campaign under the political leverage and the financial leverage of an adversary. that activity may not violate
the criminal laws of the united states. and to the extent that that was bob mueller's purpose. he is now able to submit his findings to the attorney general. a broader question is, what northern policy has been compromised by the actions of the presidential campaign, by the candidate and the president himself. >> frank figluzzi we had a little fun last night. robert mueller owns a baseball cap and a valid driver's license, and drove a car to work this week. julia ainsley walked into a restaurant in washington tonight sat at a both that had just been vacated by one robert mueller. a guy who has been a kind of public ghost like figure with those of us repeating those pictures over and over again. we know he's going to be available to barr to talk him through the report he authored. is there any other work that
they may have to sweep up that even though the special counsel's work is done. that could still require more hours and work from mueller as he's trying to get a foot out the door. >> there are more signs that he's feeling more relaxed. one of those things left to do, i still believe that because this started as a counter intelligence investigation. he owes the senate and house intelligence committees a briefing. >> he's waiting to do that. you don't just run to the hill with at least -- without at least a phone call. he needs to get that green light, and i think he owes them an explanation. highly classified on the counter intelligence findings that he's had. >> we just ran through everything that's still open. all the various field offices of
the justice department. we use these titles, southern district of new york, for people who don't think of new york in terms of a north or south entity, it's the justice department's new york's field office really in manhattan. is that the most consequential of what's still open or are you not willing to label any of the still open investigations by priority? >> what we've seen publicly of what we've seen, southern district of new york appears to have some of the most important cases. they have the look into the inauguration. we've also seen a couple of moves by the new york attorney general which issued subpoenas to deutche bank a couple weeks ago, and it's entirely possible that we'll see state action along with the work that's being done in new york. >> mr. coursey was quoted on social media as having given a
quote about i'm done, this clears me. people whose names we've been discussing, still have reason to worry? >> i think they do. i think the handoffs were to other prosecutorial offices. i think most fundamentally, we've now entered the broader phase, the phase in which the constitutional questions are pleasanted. the phase in which the security questions are presented. those are really questions for congress, and ultimately the american people. can we trust this president to carry out american foreign policy. it's something we have to rely on our elected representatives. >> i think this is a good time to sneak in a commercial break. all the noise about this, and all of our discussion tonight. it's sometimes difficult to recall what got us here in the first place, we're going to talk
about the national security threats that started it all that gave mueller his original charge. that and more when we come back. we switched. i switched. we switched. i switched to chevy. i switched to chevy. we switched to chevy. we switched for value. for family. for power. it was time to upgrade. i switched from ram to chevy. see why people are switching to chevy. we love our chevy. i love my malibu. my colorado. my camaro. my traverse. why did we switch? just look at it. ♪ just♪look at it. ahhhh! ♪ we're here. ♪
for psoriatic arthritis, otezla is proven to reduce joint swelling, tenderness, and pain. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ready to treat differently with a pill? otezla. show more of you.
it's not russia, i will say this, i don't see any reason why it would be. >> it's a tough moment for a lot of people to watch, russian meddling was at the crux of mueller's initial mandate which called for a full and thorough investigation of the russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, now, one year, 10 months, six days later, the investigation has netted. indictments and dozens of russians intel officers and russian nationals. seven people pleaded guilty. we learned at least 16 trump associates have had contact with russians along the way. back with us, jeremy bash, joyce vance and frank figluzzi. it's an odd question to ask. this is the biggest security
investigation of the modern era. are we better off for the fact that mueller's folks were digging into it. and we have these documents and now the troll and bot farms half a world away now we're at least on to them? >> yeah, i think so. i think the indictments of the intelligence officers from last year sent a shot across the bough. what's troubling at this hour, is that usually in a national security investigation, you would brief the commander in chief, the president. but what do you do when you suspect that the president himself is the national security threat. we don't have a playbook for that. we don't have a playbook for the national security investigation is the target of the president. this is going to have to go to congress and congress is going to have to evaluate fundamentally the evidence that robert mueller put together. and all the other things they
put together to determine how do you deal in the constitutional crisis. >> i would add to that, a discussion you and i have had on a rolling basis on this broadcast. and that is your assumption that your fellow professionals in the intel community have put heads down and have kept doing the job they were trained to do even if orders looking like that haven't come from the top. >> that's right, i think they have spoken truth to power. they have done their work and called out russian interference and russian meddling, even if the president has refused to. >> how much ground in your view have we lost in what should be the central fight, our disbelief that another country reached into our country and affected our presidential election to a
degree we've yet to decide and agree on. how much have we lost in what should be a daily fight against them? >> the definition of intelligence is inactionable information. as jeremy said, perhaps the greatest findings so far in the mueller case has been the fact that russia clearly meddled and attempted to meddle with our election, that's great intel. it's great information. it doesn't become great intel until it's actioned, and we have a chief executive who appears not to be actioning that information. so the question is, if you have all of these great findings, what are we doing about it, there are reports already that russian bots are already on social media trying to get us thinking in a certain direction toward the 2020 election. what have we done to shore up security around our next election. what are states doing?
is anyone listening. we're still in a national security risk. >> joyce vance, very to say, with this new vocabulary we all have it was the speaking indictments that laid out the story that ramped up our defenses. turns out we opened the door for them and they came in. >> i think people should go back and reread the indictments. they do tell a narrative story and it's a very important one. the real problem opinion we know that russia tried to interfere with our elections. this president felt like maybe the result of the election was called into question was unable
to prove russia interfered. and yet no, sir is being done to assist those units of government in conducting elections without further interference. >> i have a hunch that wikileaks and assange are going to come back into the national conversati conversation. how should americans think of those two proper names. >> i think they should think of them as agents of the russian federation. there are multiple points where the russian federation went to the trump campaign beginning in april of 2016, we have dirt on hillary clinton and the russian government went to the trump tower and had the meeting. a russian intelligence officer met with paul manafort and talked about polling. roger stone served as a conduit between the trump campaign and
the russian federation's intelligence assets. have you multiple points of contact. the prudent question is, maybe no laws were broken with respect to those relationships, was there an abuse of power. was there a compromise of american foreign policy? because that ultimately goes to whether or not the president remains fit for office. >> frank, is it something else entirely to try to bring assange or wikileaks to any american style or american notion of justice? >> i don't think people are giving up on that. >> i was a part of early discussions on how to handle wiki leaks and assange, i can tell you those agents, those prosecutors are still working, there's clearly something very significant going on in the eastern district of virginia involving wikileaks and/or
assange. perhaps he's already been indicted. and i think the key gap is tieing him to a plot to release the russian hacked e-mails with a deliberate intent to mess with the election. did they understand they were going to damage the electoral process in the united states? my gut tells me yes, they did. the question is how to prove that, and if that can be proven, every attempt will be made to get assange back here for justice. >> i watched between 12 and 14 hours of cable news coverage. it occurs to me just today. and i don't like to brag, i did hear it theorized that when we woke up this morning the most important american alive was robert mueller. by tonight it's william barr the attorney general, a man who's had that job before. do you concur? >> i'm not sure if i agree.
i think what's really important, and i'm going to say this at the risk of sounding silly and patri patriotic. >> please do. >> the most important person in america is the american citizen who should be watching what william barr does, who should be a student of bob mueller's work, in 2020 we're all going to have the most important decision of our lives to make in the ballot. when we vote in the election, and whether congress acts, no matter what their conclusions or bob mueller's were, each of us have an obligation as an american citizen to determine whether this president is fit for office. >> sometimes it's a matter of knowing which quote to end a conversation on. i think we just heard it. a long day's journey into night. much obliged to your help. thank you, the three of you. coming up on this consequential friday night. a pulitzer prize winner who's pretty good with words himself
is here to help us put everything into perspective when we continue. it's kind of like playing your own version of best ball. because here, you can choose any car in the aisle, even if it's a better car class than the one you reserved. so no matter what, you're guaranteed to have a perfect drive. [laughter] (vo) go national. go like a pro. see what i did there? i felt i couldn't be at my best wifor my family. c, in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured and left those doubts behind. i faced reminders of my hep c every day.
but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. even hanging with friends i worried about my hep c. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. mavyret is the only 8-week cure for all common types of hep c. before starting mavyret your doctor will test if you've had hepatitis b which may flare up and cause serious liver problems during and after treatment. tell your doctor if you've had hepatitis b, a liver or kidney transplant, other liver problems, hiv-1, or other medical conditions, and all medicines you take including herbal supplements. don't take mavyret with atazanavir or rifampin, or if you've had certain liver problems. common side effects include headache and tiredness. with hep c behind me, i feel free... ...fearless... ...and there's no looking back, because i am cured. talk to your doctor about mavyret. whooo! want to take your next vacation to new heights? tripadvisor now lets you book over a hundred thousand tours, attractions, and experiences in destinations around the world!
like new york! from bus tours, to breathtaking adventures, tripadvisor makes it easy to find and book amazing things to do. and you can cancel most bookings up to 24 hours in advance for a full refund. so you can make your next trip... monumental! read reviews check hotel prices book things to do tripadvisor with the chase ink business unlimited card, i get unlimited 1.5% cash back. it's so simple, i don't even have to think about it. so i think about mouthfeel. i don't think about the ink card. i think about nitrogen ice cream in supermarkets all over the world. i think about the details. fine, i obsess over the details. think about every part of your business except the one part that works without a thought. your ink card. chase ink business unlimited. chase ink business unlimited, with unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase.
chase for business. make more of what's yours. just two numbers here. donald trump has been president for 792 days. the number we start the broadcast with every night. robert mueller has been on the job for 675 of those. but this last week may be the last of its kind now that the report is out. if you remember, we saw trump go on an extensive social media rant with over 50 tweets in two days, over one an hour, an ongoing feud with george conway, husband of his counselor kellyanne conway. conway questioned the president's mental capacity. the president fired back, called him a wack job and then some. trump continues his attacks on the late republican senator john mccain. he blames him for the steele
dossier, complaining that he was never thanked for approving mccain's funeral, among other things. finally, this is just today, trump undercut his own administration by rolling back new sanctions on north korea. his spokeswoman explained it's because he likes chairman kim. and he said again today that democrats are anti-jewish. so while this may be the kind of week we've become accustomed to around here, it may well be known as the week before the mueller report versus after the mueller report. and so on a night like this we are so pleased to have our friend jon meacham here with us in new york. pulitzer prize-winning author and historian. latest work is "the soul of america: the battle for our better angels." welcome. >> thank you, sir. >> what will we remember march 22nd for? and for how long? is this -- are we living a moment of true consequence
within a moment of true consequence? >> yes. my mind immediately went to july 16th, 1973, alexander butterfield reveals that the white house has a taping system. then it went to november 25th -- 26th. iran contra is revealed. reagan comes in the briefing room, ed meese is there. he says not only did we sell arms but we diverted the money to the contras. >> a genuine moment. >> and so what we don't know, and this is with a nod to secretary rumsfeld, is a known unknown. we don't know exactly what it's going to look like. but what is in this report i believe will shape at least the next six years of political history because if he hasn't got him, let's just speak bluntly, if he hasn't got him trump will spin that into a strong position in two years' time.
he'll say the deep state tried, they spent all this money, it didn't happen. if they've got him, we may or may not have a witting asset of a foreign government in the oval office. and so to me the most -- i know this. this i do know. attorney general barr is not streaming netflix tonight. he is reading something that will shape who we are for at least two years, six years, and like watergate, like iran contra it will have significant implications going forward. >> unlike those periods we have a president whose use of fascinating, wherever you want to begin, but talks about "our people." his base. not of the collective, the kind of steward of all of us. he talks about his people and used a phrase in the last 24 hours, "people wouldn't stand for that." and everyone knows exactly what he's talking about. >> exactly. will there be a maga pitchfork
rebellion? and that's going to be one of the great questions here, is will this inevitably go into the tribal cuisinart? and 50% of the country are going to think he's guilty, 49%'s going to think he's not. but the 49% is louder and more motivated. to me in an interesting way it's the most fascinating citizenship question because will fact actually continue to be a governing principle in our political affairs or is it going to be what people want to believe, not what's on the page? >> well, who has the moral authority? who can speak with enough lumber to move those numbers, those percentages you just listed? >> i think that director mueller himself, interestingly, has become that figure. i don't think we're in a position where -- we all talk about the goldwater moment where hugh scott and john ryans went
down. but that was so late. it was the 6th of august and nixon left on the 8th and 9th of august. i think it's going to be -- joyce was just saying this. i think it's going to be all of us. it's a stress test for citizenship. and are we -- are republicans, the party that gets a lion's share it seems to me for victory in the cold war, which will upset democrats, but i think that republican presidents and ultimately reagan and bush were so essential there. started by truman and conducted by all of them. but republicans built a significant presidential governing coalition on projecting power against the soviet union. and standing against totalitarianism. they have to recover that tradition and think about what the facts tell them. you know, reagan used to say -- i think that first speech in 1964 for barry goldwater, right before the election, now just
known as the speech. he said the problem with liberals is not that they don't know but just so much they think they know that isn't so. that's what has to be applied now i think to people who are inclined to believe the president at all costs. >> i have about 20 seconds. when carl bernstein says, as he says to this day, republicans were the heroes of watergate, is that too easy or do you concur with that writ large? >> they were very late. at the very end of the day they jumped in front of the train. i think in a weird way it transcends those quick -- the standard partisan dimensions here. there's about 20% of the country that actually does make up their mind based on facts, and i think it's on those folks who are not already assigned to one team or the other. and they need to be the umpires. >> i'm amazed you didn't just call them better angels. thank you very much. you transcend your fair share as
well. jon meacham, always such a pleasure to have him as part of our broadcast, especially on a consequential friday night. that is our broadcast indeed for this friday and for this week. thank you for being here with us. have a good weekend. good night from our nbc news headquarters here in new york. a couple of hours ago, maybe even less than that, i was standing knee deep in a trout stream in tennessee. but now it's mueller time and so i'm in a studio in the great state of tennessee. the trout are basically just as safe as they were when i was flailing away at them ineffectually this afternoon. but now it is -- listen, it's -- this is history. this is a reason to stop fishing and go to work. our job tonight as a country sort of or at as