tv Hardball With Chris Matthews MSNBC April 8, 2019 4:00pm-5:00pm PDT
questions come up and we'll have guests like jim walden, michelle goldberg and the legal robbed redford himself john flannery joins us. i hope you'll come back. 6:00 p.m. eastern. that does it for me, though. "hardball" with chris matthews is up next. is america full or is trump? let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm chris matthews in washington. donald trump, who promised to create jobs, made his bones, of course, by famously ending them. >> you're fired. >> in the past 24 hours, the president has done just that to two top officials at the department of homeland security. last night dhs secretary kirstjen nielsen resigned under pressure after meeting with the president at the white house, and just this afternoon, secret service director randolph alice, who answers to nielsen, was
removed from his post. the latest shake-up comes just days after the president with drew the nomination of another dhs official, acting i.c.e. director von vitiello, who he tapped to lead the agency permanently. before leaving to visit the border this past friday. >> we're going in a little different direction. ron's a good man, but we're going in a tougher direction. we want to go in a tougher direction. >> tougher direction. tougher direction. and that desire reportedly led to nielsen's departure "the new york times" reports that the president called ms. nielsen at home early in the mornings to demand she takes action to stop migrants from entering the country, including doing things that were clearly illegal, such as blocking migrants from seeking asylum. nbc news reports nielsen and the president clashed on his desire to reinstate the policy of
separating migrant families, extremely unpopular in this country, noting according to two sources familiar with the white house meetings nielsen told trump that federal court orders prohibited the department of homeland security from reinstating that policy of separating families and that he would be reversing his own executive order from june that ended family separations. well, that didn't stop the president. the departures lead the leadership of the homeland security department in tatters. with nielsen's departure, a host of top posts at the agency are now staffed by unconfirmed officials, including the secretary, the deputy secretary, the head of fema, the director of i.c.e., the inspector general and on wednesday customs and border protection as well. the current commissioner, kevin mcaleenan, has been tapped to replace nielsen as acting dhs secretary. for more, i'm joined by peter baker, chief white house correspondent for "the new york times." white house reporter for npr and former republican congressman from florida, who we have to say is no longer associated with the republican party. thank you all. i want to start with peter.
this looks like something big. like, is this trump getting ready for re-election saying i'm going to be mr. big, i'm going to be tough as hell on illegal immigrants? >> well, look week of course he's been frustrated for quite some time his own administration is unable to carry out the wishes he's imposed on it. as you say, in some cases they're telling him we can't do it. we don't have the authority to do it upped the law or cord orders or what have you. he lashed out last week. he said i'm going to close the border entirely to all trade and traffic, and even legal immigration until he was warned by economics officials that that would do great damage to the economy. he bakcked off, but clearly in deciding to get rid of secretary nielsen and some other people also on the way out, he's trying to, you know, shake things up until he can find people who will carry out the orders he wants to have carried out. the trick is, who can he get that will actually do that and be confirmed by the senate? even some republicans on the hill are a little upset about
this right now. they think that they're looking for scapegoats and pushing out people who actually agree with the president on his policies, even though they're not able to do all the things he wants them to do. >> aiesha, you next. it seems to me trump is running against illegal immigration. it couldn't be simpler. that's how he got elected in pennsylvania and places like that. he ran against basically hispanic people coming into the country across the border. he can't seem to find the law on his side. american law is apparently more patient, more discerning, whatever. it doesn't go along with his sort of clobbering idea, you come across the border, i clobber you back to the other side. no law will do that, nor will anybody under him agree to enforce something like that. >> well, that's the issue. this isn't really a personnel issue. it's an issue of the courts and the law and them just not allowing him to do what he wants to do. he can bring in someone who is really tough and looks really tough and talks really tough, but is that person going to break the law? they just had another court case that said you're not going to be able to keep people in mexico
while they apply for asylum. that's another blow against this administration, and what they're trying to do. unless you're going to change the laws, which with a divided congress i don't know how that happens. >> yeah. >> but unless you do that, he's going to be stuck in this situation. >> dave jolly, it sounds to me he is in need of a different law to enforce because he doesn't have law now that sets the standards he set in his own campaign, i'm going to stop illegal immigration flat. that's what i'm going to do. no more people coming across that border illegally. he doesn't seem to have the law on his side. what's he got at this point except rhetoric? >> you're right, chris. this story has the perfect trumpisms in it. we know from reporting that he ordered government officials to actually break the law, which in any other environment would be subject to congressional hearings immediately. we also know that he's been exceedingly brash. a man who likes to meet with the north korean dictator, frankly, should be bringing together
central american leaders and mexico and say let's figure out how we humanely deal with this crisis. at the end of the day, chris, i think what donald trump is overlooking and why he can never get past that threshold of his base, this issue lays bare the president's soul to the american people. in many ways, the trump administration's soul. that in response to humanitarian crises, answer is to be harder on the people -- >> yeah. >> to be swifter to punish them. the american people see that and they're afraid what he's doing is projecting that as the soul of america to the international community. >> well, peter, just back to you on that very thought. it could be that his constituency is just as tough as he is. that the people in pennsylvania and places like that who don't like new hispanic neighbors, if you will, who are angry about illegal immigration, usually for ethnic reasons, those people aren't that sympathetic to people coming up here for asylum reasons or foe asylum reasons, economic reasons, they're not happy with them. they want them pushed back. and trump's problem is he's between his promises to red-hot
constituency he drummed up in the campaign and the law, seems to me. peter? >> yeah, sure. i think that's right. a lot of voters who supported donald trump see immigrants as competing with native-born americans for jobs and for government benefits and so on, whether, you know, the studies will show different things. but in their communities or in their media environment that they are watching, that's the way they perceive it. they look at the president and say, well, why can't you do what you said? he wants to be able to do what he said. i'm president of the united states, how come i can't simply make this happen? he's frustrated by the laws and the bureaucrat rules and the various, you know, things that have been in place for many, many years that are beyond a president's analyst to simply snap his finger and change. >> well, he comes off as a football owner that just keeps firing managers is what's going on. coaching anyway. the shake-up at homeland security comes as president trump reviews or renews, rather, his focus on the southern border after cuss tutoms and border
protection reported a surge of apprehensions this past month. the president seemingly trying to warn off migrants looking to come to the u.s. here he goes. >> it's a colossal surge and it's overwhelming our immigration system. and we can't let that happen. so as i say, and this is our new statement, the system is full. can't take you anymore. our country is full. our area's full. the sector is full. can't take you anymore, i'm sorry. can't happen. so turn around. that's the way it is. >> on a series of tweets yesterday, the president doubled down on that argument, repeatedly saying the country is full. dave jolly, the politics of this are pretty devastating because americans say we're a country of immigrants but we're not really. it depends on ethnicity. we all know that. that's the way it has been in the last presidential election. but the issue of illegal immigration didn't work for the republicans in 2018. it seemed to have a presidential
power, but not in a congressional way. how does he get the congress to go along with any law change if he even goes that far? so now he's just firing people. nielsen is the first head to roll. >> he won't, chris. look, this is a hard conversation, but let's finish the president's sentence for him because apparently he's too scared to do so. what he's saying in his mind is that the nation is already full of mexicans and those from central america. >> right. >> it is full of hispanics. that is what the president is saying. because he's not trying to close any other border. recall just 12 weeks ago he suggested it was isis that was coming through the caravans. that's why he had to close the border. he does not have the law on his side, nor should he. the asylum laws are there so that we can give a fair hearing to those who want to offer a petition that they are escaping harm in their home country. this is where the president by responding by treating these people more harshly will disconnect from those voters that we saw come out last november. >> so the big question i think to everybody on the show right now is what does tougher mean.
i want to go to ayesha on that in a moment. stephen miller is apparently consolidating his control over administration policy. an strigs official told "the wall street journal" president trump recently told miller, one of his most hardline advisers of this administration on immigration policy, you're in charge. meanwhile, politico reports the person close to nielsen said there is definitely a larger shake-up abreast being led by stephen miller and the staunch right wing within the administration. they failed with the courts and with congress and now they're eating their own. here it comes. what does it mean when trump says you didn't like family separation, get ready for this. i'm getting even tougher. >> well, it's not really clear because the one thing that happened with family separations is he had to pull back on that. he had to reverse that. >> it looked awful. >> now he wants to bring it back again. >> it looked like sophie's choice. it looked terrible. >> it may work with his base, but it also is going to mobilize a lot of people against him and against republicans. that's why you had republicans at that time saying this won't stand. you cannot continue this type of
policy. so if he tries to bring back the family separation, you're only going to see more people mobilized against that. i don't know what he could do that would be more tough than that. >> let me go back to peter on this because i think it is a front page analysis reality here. we're looking into a much more hard to believe it more polarized election in 2020 than in 2016, and the president seems to want to more polarized. >> well, he's playing on these issues, of course, that are very, very divisive in the united states right now. immigration being his central signature issue. it's so important to his identity, his sense of this administration, this presidency. he was elected on this, as far as he was concerned. he was elected on build the wall. he was elected on protecting the country. he's willing -- he's said this, he's willing to sacrifice other priorities in order to make this happen. even the economy he says is not as important as security at the border. he has made very clear through the shutdown that lasted five weeks, very clear through the actions of the last week or two that this is going to be his number one priority going forward into this election.
this election may be fought out on this very issue. >> will the democrats let it become that clear cut? therefore something like leniency, compassion, open borders in some sense, rather than being with trump, are they willing to let the divide open up that clearly? peter? >> well, i think their message is a little fuzzier than his, right? his is relatively straightforward. i'm going to protect the country. i'm going to stop them from coming in. democrats are to some extent divided between those like beto o'rourke who says let's tear down the wall we've already got there at el paso where he was a congressman. others say, no, no we're for border security, but a more rational immigration system that provides at least some sort of path to residency or citizenship for people who are already here and doesn't try to make deportation the only answer to the question. that's a harder message to sell, right? but on the other hand, the president, as you said, went out on the campaign trail last fall, he tried to sell the idea that the democrats were for open borders to the electorate. it didn't work in a congressional year.
a presidential year is a different year. different kind of electorate. >> i agree. >> we'll see how that plays out. >> let's go to david on this one because it seems stephen miller taking over tells us basically he's brinking in frank rizzo, he's brinking in the toughest guy he's got here. you're not a republican. is this going to make you less a republican if we go to def con 2. >> stephen miller said he would be happy if not one additional foot of an asylum seeker ever set ground on american soil. chris, this is the interesting thing, to your last conversation with peter. no politician today should accept this as a binary choice between open borders and security. the person who can succeed on this issue, and, frankly, donald trump could accomplish much of what he wants to do on security if you led by showing that you're actually going to take care of the human crisis. that doesn't mean you have to admit everybody in. publicly deploy health care workers and education workers, teachers to take care of these
families and these young children and make that the face of american immigration policy. that we're going to attend to the very human crisis while also supporting border security. the american people want border security. but their heart is in a very different place than the president of the united states' on this. >> i agree with you. i think the family separation killed trump for awhile, not too long, he came back, but i also think a conservative point of view, a republican point of view voiced very well on chuck's show here yesterday on "meet the press." i thought mitt romney sounded very solid on immigration. more conservative view, but hi sounded like a traditional republican, not a trumpite. anyway, he looked good. thank you so much, peter baker, ayesha rasco and david jolly. coming up, the fight over trump's tax returns. his acting chief of staff says democrats will never, ever -- forget the alibi -- not even talking about audits. you're never getting your hands on the president's tax returns. what's that about? but never is a long time and the law says the irs has to -- shall
turn over those forms. plus, barack obama warns democrats not to kill each other. >> one of the things i do worry about sometimes among progressives in the united states, maybe it's true here as well, is a certain kind of rigidity. >> the former president talking about ideological purity and warning democrats about what he calls the circular firing squad. that's an image. much more ahead on that one. stick with us. us.with a lot ofr young couples. then we noticed something...strange. oh, could you, uh, make me a burger? -poof -- you're a burger. [ laughter ] -everyone acts like their parents. -you have a tattoo. -yes. -fun. do you not work? -so, what kind of mower you got, seth? -i don't know. some kid comes over. we pay him to do it. -but it's not all bad. someone even showed us how we can save money by bundling home and auto with progressive. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. but we can protect your home and auto.
val, vern... i'm off to college and i'm not gonna be around... i'm worried about my parents' retirement. oh, don't worry. voya helps them to and through retirement... ...dealing with today's expenses... ...like college... ...while helping plan, invest and protect for the future. so they'll be okay... without me? um... and when we knock out this wall imagine the closet space? yes! oh hey, son. yeah, i think they'll be fine. voya. helping you to and through retirement. - there but what are wes to get our messactually saying?ys. any message is a story. and all stories tell the tale of the times we live in right now. how do you want to be remembered? how do you want your story to play out? our own experiences make the best stories, and your words carry a lot of weight. think about what you want to say before you say it. or send it.
welcome back to "hardball." the battle for president trump's tax returns is well under way after the house ways and means committee issued a formal request to the irs last week. the chairman of that committee, congressman richard neal of massachusetts, has set a deadline of wednesday, that's tomorrow. however, acting white house chief of staff mick mulvaney said yesterday the democrats
will never -- this sounds like an 8-year-old again. never get the tax returns. listen to the guy. >> to be clear, you believe democrats will never see the president's tax returns? >> oh, no, never. nor should they. keep in mind, that's an issue that was already litigated during the election. voters knew the president could have given his tax returns. they knew that he didn't and they elected him anyway, which, of course, is what drives the democrats crazy. >> that's the lamest argument. in other words, if he continued talking like he did on the "access hollywood" tape in his inaugural address, that would be meeting the concerns of the voters. this is crazy. nobody voted for him because he wouldn't release his tax returns. the problem for trump is that the law appears firmly on the side of the ways and means committee. the tax law makes clear upon written request, the secretary of the treasury shall furnish such committee with any return or return information. that's pretty clear. meanwhile, lawmakers in new york state are attempting to use another route to obtain the president's taxes as "the new york times" was first to report. "under a bill that is scheduled
to be introduced this week, the new york commissioner of taxation and finance would be permitted to release any state tax return requested by any leader of three congressional committees. designed to be a safety valve for any attempt by the white house to block the congress from doing this at the federal level." i'm joined now by betsy woodruff and robert costa, national political reporter with "the washington post." i want to start with robert on this. it's interesting to me that mick mulvaney blew the president's cover this weekend by saying "never." the president always said i'm being audited. >> mick mulvaney is playing spokesman for the president there as well as acting chief of staff. talking to white house officials today, they believe, chris, this goes to the courts, regardless of what mr. mulvaney or the president says. because richard neal, the chairman, sent the letter to the irs and the department of
justice may try to protect the institution of the presidency, it will likely be up to federal courts to decide what gets released, if anything. >> that's the law. okay. i think the law makes it clear. it goes to the court. we have a 5-4 republican court. we'll see. the politics of it. do they think they're solid because their 40%-ish of the voters don't give a damn about the tax returns if he holds them or hides them? robert? >> they believe they were able to win in 2016 without the president releasing his tax returns and they still believe his core voters will be with him regardless of what's in those returns. there is sensitivity in the trump circle about his brand politically. they want to be seen as the billionaire working man's candidate. that's the pitch they give us behind the scenes when they're talking to reporters about how they want to cast him for 2020. so the tax returns could complicate that should he have different tax arrangements. at this point, not having the returns out there makes that political sale easier for them. >> let's go to congressman
dogged of texas. thank you, sir, for coming on. what can you do? there is a deadline of wednesday, wednesday this week, richie neal, the chairman of your committee, ways and means, says you got to give me the tax returns. what happens when the president blows you off? >> well, chris, you've been talking about the wall along the border of my home state of texas. this is the wall the president really cares about. he wants his minions to erect a wall around him and protect him from any oversight. the law is clear, as you pointed out repeatedly, shall means shall, and this irs commissioner has a legal responsibility to fulfill what is really a mintierial task of giving the committee what the law demands. >> i'm sorry. go ahead, congressman. >> i'm sorry. the only question is whether now we have obstruction in this area also, and whether the president is instructing mr. mulvaney, the treasury secretary, the irs
commissioner, to interfere and ignore the law, since this president never believes the law applies to him. >> what are you going to do if he says no? >> well, i think -- >> the irs commissioner. >> i wouldn't prejudge this because he does have a public trust. but if he says no, there are a variety of legal remedies available, and we need to use them properly because i think never means never, and mr. mulvaney appears to indicate the president's view that he will never disclose this voluntarily, even though back in 2016 he said he would have them available in three or four months, and like everything else with trump, that they would be great. well, i'm ready to see those great returns. if we get them, of course they won't be on your program or on the front page of "the times," they'll be reviewed carefully in private by experts, subject to penalty for disclosure. if that investigation indicates that some of it -- all of it should be made public then we would need to take a vote at that time. >> thank you so much, u.s.
congressman lloyd dogget. william barr under increased pressure as he faces the house and senate appropriations committee. house tomorrow, senate wednesday. barr's opening statement, which was obtained by nbc, makes no mention of mueller, big surprise. as "the washington post" reports, his testimony will be scrutinized for any sign he's trying to protect the president. barr's expected to release a redacted version by the middle of this month, redacted, trump attorney rudy giuliani said he's fine with releasing the whole shebang of it to the house judiciary committee. watch rudy. >> would you like to respond to the congressman who says he has the right and the committee has the right for all of this information? do you agree that the public has the right? >> i would like him to get all the information. >> including the things that are protected, the grand jury material? >> but i can't control that and i can't change the law. >> rudy's amazing. betsy, let me ask you about the state end of this. big story today. there is a change in the new york state legislature to try to get the tax returns. get the state returns.
they've got all this stuff, too. >> that's right. i had a long conversation earlier today with a former prosecutor in the justice department's tax division who spent years and years very much in the weeds of sort of the nitty-gritty side of how tax law works. he was anonymous for client reasons, but what he said is that if he were in trump's position, he would be most concerned about what new york state is doing. his view is that the question of whether or not ways and means can get the president's tax returns is an unprecedented legal question. it's going to get litigated and it's hard to perfectly predict how it will fall out. however, if new york state is able to pass this legislation, and the legislation stands up against inevitable legal concerns, the irs won't necessarily be able to intervene because these tax returns in the new york state don't belong to the irs, they belong to the state itself. >> state sovereignty and a democratic governor, andrew cuomo. >> it's called federalism. >> and a democratic legislature. they can do the whole business. what do you make of giuliani,
robert? giuliani always amazing me. i mean that positively. some days he's a toady. some days he's whimsical. what do you make of him saying, yeah, you ought to have the full report? what's he up to here? >> he's a politician as well as the president's personal attorney. he's trying to appear to be open to disclosure of these documents at the same time. he knows the fight's going to be settled in court and he knows he doesn't need to protect his client so much at this point because the justice department could step in to protect the institution of the presidency, and as a personal attorney, he can say his client wants disclosure, but he knows the process is playing out far beyond his own control. >> now, barr still works for the president, william barr. >> that's right. >> he's had an interest history, a long one. i'm not going to rejudge what he's going to do tomorrow. barr is going to testify starting with the house tomorrow. is he going to walk in and give an opening statement that has nothing to do with the mueller
report, get his first question from the chairman and then go, yeah, i'm not going to talk about that today. is he going to stonewall? >> i think it's likely any questions about the contents of the mueller report he will stonewall. one of the biggest questions from congress and i don't know if this particular committee is going to grill him on it. one of the biggest questions from congress writ large is whether barr will work with chairman nadler, who runs the house judiciary committee, to try to get a federal judge to authorize the release of some of the grand jury material in the mueller report. nadler has already asked barr to try to help him out with that to minimize the number of redactions. democratic staffers said barr's response to nadler was "i'll think about it." he's had some time to think about it. it's a possibly that democrats will ask what his thoughts are. >> he may show a little leg. rudy giuliani, neither one of these guys want to be known for the rest of their lives as toadies of trump. they don't want to be looked at that way. mulvaney may want that job, chief toady.
pardo pardon me? >> listen tomorrow to what the attorney general says about executive power. that's going to be his term when he references executive power as a way of protecting the institution of the presidency. that will tell us a lot about if he's protecting president trump. >> well said. thank you so much. betsy woodruff and robert costa. up next, barack obama's warning democrats not to engage -- i love this phrase. circular firing squad where no democrat wins, only trump. are rigid ideological divisions hurting democrats' chances of defeating trump already come 2020? more after this. ah! that was a stunt driver. that's why esurance has this drivesense® app. the safer you drive, the more you save. don't worry, i'm not using my phone and talking to a camera while driving... i'm being towed. by the way, i'm actually a safe driver. i'm just pretending to be a not safe driver. cool. bye dennis quaid! when insurance is affordable, it's surprisingly painless.
sorry, is that too loud?oud. you don't need any more hormones in your house. that's why you chose kraft natural cheese. made with fresh milk without the added hormone rbst. it's cheese as it should be. i like to make my life easy. ( ♪ ) romo mode. (beep) (bang) good luck with that one. yes! that's why i wear skechers slip-ons. they're effortless. just slip them right on and off. skechers slip-ons, with air-cooled memory foam. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ when didwhen i needed ton? jumpstart sales. build attendance for an event. help people find their way. fastsigns designed new directional signage. ...and got them back on track. get started at fastsigns.com. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.
welcome back to "hardball." in 2020, donald trump will campaign on a dark warning about the democrats. according to "the washington post," trump will focus on a foreboding populist message about the perils of lax immigration policy, socialist health care plans and foreign economic threats. but according to "the new york times," two years into office, trump's aides are saying he's tired and only willing now to commit to one event a day. his record's already under assault, of course, from what could end up being dozens of democratic contenders looking to take him down. this weekend president obama had a word of warning for those democrats. that's coming up next. you're watching "hardball." l. video games have evolved.
why hasn't the way you bank? virtual wallet from pnc bank helps make it easier to see what you're spending, stash more into savings and stay on top of your finances in a digital world. just one way pnc is modernizing banking to help make things easier. pnc bank. make today the day. with the most lobster dishes lobsterfesof the yearred lobster like our classic lobster lover's dream... so hurry in! lobsterfest ends april twenty-first. and now for a limited time, get ten percent off red lobster to go. has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life.
welcome back to "hardball." with the field of democratic presidential candidates now nearing 20, it's going to go beyond 20. there we go, two dozen now. we're starting to see some big differences in policy. former president barack obama while in germany warned democratic voters against being too rigid ideologically. catch this warning from offshore. >> and one of the things i do worry about sometimes among progressives in the united states, maybe it's true here as well, is a certain kind of rigidity, where we say, i'm sorry, this is how it's going to be and then we start sometimes creating what's called a circular firing squad. where you are shooting at your allies because one of them is straying from purity on the issues. and when that happens, typically
the overall effort and movement weakens. >> for more i'm joined by former chief of staff to nancy pelosi, who is fabulous, i must say. ever since you left her, she keeps getting better and better. i'm just kidding. and michael steel, former staffer for house speaker john boehner. the slow cadence he spoke there, a couple of beats between words. their ability to pick up on every word so well-delivered. >> absolutely. >> also, can the democrats pick up on it? do you think when they hear this person say, wait a minute, i'm with bernie, but not quite with kamala. i'm over here with biden, maybe terry mcauliffe is coming in next week. there is a divide. >> 100% there is a divide. this was a message that was sent by president obama. he lived it. he understands what it's like to be getting fired on from the left and sometimes from the right of his own party.
the problem that democrats are going to be facing over the next few months is just that. there are going to be too many candidates running a rigid ideological campaign. i tell them this, go out and get the votes. you know, if you believe that your philosophy and your policies are going to win, go out and do it. don't go after your own candidates. >> you're a republican. so let me ask you this, you're watching this from the other side. it does look like, you know, napoleon said never get in the way when people are shooting themselves in a firing squad. >> i think the president -- former president is 100% wrong. i think these democratic candidates need to take off the kid gloves, start doing some hard ball because they need to start knocking some candidates out of this race quickly, otherwise the democratic party is going to nominate bernie sanders. if we have a race between donald trump and bernie sanders, i'm voting for the white walkers. >> i think i might be with you in terms of the analysis. why do you think bernie wins in a wide-open 24-person field? >> because bernie supporters are bernie supporters. they are idealogically
committed. they are on his side. they are a substantial chunk of the party. if the rest of the party divides between these 50 some-odd other candidates, he wins. >> let me go to pete, he's got all the heat right now, the mayor of south bend, indiana is having great success. raising a lot of money. this weekend the mayor attended the lgbtq victory fund brunch, and during his speech he had this to say about vp pence. >> i can tell you that if me being gay was a choice, it was a choice that was made far, far above my pay grade. and that's the thing i wish the mike pences of the world would understand, that if you got a problem with who i am, your problem is not with me, your quarrel, sir, is with my creator. >> boy, you know, pretty hard to argue it. we're all god's children. we believers believe. we don't think we picked our orientations. nobody i know thought they did.
trent lott used to say we had a choice, like lionel richie coke and pepsi. not exactly. it's nature, not nurture. >> that's right. >> at least as far as we understand it's nature. we don't understand anything. >> mike and i agree on many things, but i completely disagree about taking the gloves off. what voters want to hear is exactly what mayor pete just said. they want to hear genuine. they want to hear him take on the administration in a way that they can connect with. bernie is doing it. senator harris is doing it. mayor pete is doing it. this is what needs to happen over the next few months. if we start attacking each other as democratic candidates, guess who wins? president trump. >> well, what happens when some candidates like right now the democratic action's on the left and it's on the youth. >> right. >> i can see this. bernie comes along and said i'm for basically national health care. call it medicare for all is a nice way of saying it. a nationally-run government health insurance program. i want college tuition paid for for everybody.
no means testing, or even means testing. he comes out with positions and somebody says no more i.c.e. no more enforcement of immigration. no country in the world has no enforcement. >> right. >> another candidate is a woman, wait a minute, i better catch up to that team. you have everybody over there. that's where trump wants them. >> right. >> trump wants everybody bunched on the hard-left. you know that. >> this is what's scaring me about what's happening in the democratic primary right now. the president trades -- >> you said you want them to fight it out. >> i want a strong candidate to emerge to make sure my choice isn't between donald trump and bernie sanders. the american people's choice isn't between donald trump and bernie sanders because donald trump trades between 43 and 46% approval. he needs a hard-left democratic candidate so he can rail about open borders and socialism -- >> yeah, i know. >> and be right. >> well, he's got -- open borders, socialism and late-term abortion. i know the whole three he's figured out for pennsylvania. tonight, a field of democratic presidential candidates grows as we sit here. california congressman eric swalwell, a great friend of this
show, told steve colbert tonight, it will be on at 11:0 that the country is in quick sand plagued by inaction and that's why he is running for president. here is eric swalwell. >> and none of that is going to change until we get a leader who is willing to go big on the issues we take on, be bold in the solutions we offer and do good in the way that we govern. i'm ready to solve these problems. i'm running for president of the united states. >> it's official. >> thank you. it's official. >> now it's official. >> boy, did it feel good to say is that. >> in the bay area of san francisco. he's be an incumbent. pete stark was a little over the hill when he beat him, but he did win a primary against the incumbent, which is what nancy pelosi doesn't like right now. don't come -- don't challenge incumbent democrats. he did. now he's running for president. >> that was back then. we're talking about now. >> okay. >> look, he's an interesting candidate. >> good on tv. >> he's good on tv. he's young. he's in a judiciary committee,
intel committee. he's got his pulse. he knows how to help elect democrats, young democrats in tough districts. he can go in any district in the country and have a conversation about who he is, what he wants to produce for democrats. and, look, he is someone who is completely not aligned with a bernie sanders, but his message is going to resonate across -- >> you know, i always want to know when is the filing deadline for re-election? >> right. if he's going to give up the house to do this. >> that would run right up until the filing deadline and be right back in the house. eric's a good guy and a good candidate. thank you so much. great to have you. good work. the way you built up nancy pelosi to be the greatest politician of our time. anyway, thank you. thank you, michael. up next, susan page joins us to talk about a woman who left a lasting impression during the course of her role in american politics. a lot of these first ladies are much tougher and bigger at home in advising their partners, their spouses than you ever figured out from television.
back after this. at&t provides edge-to-edge intelligence, covering virtually every part of your manufacturing business. ... & so this... won't happen... ...because you've made sure this sensor and this machine are integrated. ...& she can talk to him &... ...yes...some people assign genders to machines... atta, boy. ... & you can be sure you won't have any problems... except for the daily theft of your danish. at&t provides edge to edge intelligence. it can do so much for your business, the list goes on and on. that's the power of &. & this shipment will be delivered.... tailored recommendations, tax-efficient investing strategies, and a dedicated advisor to help you grow and protect your wealth. fidelity wealth management.
to help you grow and protect your wealth. i felt i couldn't be at my best wifor my family. c, in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured and left those doubts behind. i faced reminders of my hep c every day. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. even hanging with friends i worried about my hep c. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. mavyret is the only 8-week cure for all common types of hep c. before starting mavyret your doctor will test if you've had hepatitis b which may flare up and cause serious liver problems during and after treatment. tell your doctor if you've had hepatitis b, a liver or kidney transplant, other liver problems, hiv-1, or other medical conditions,
and all medicines you take including herbal supplements. don't take mavyret with atazanavir or rifampin, or if you've had certain liver problems. common side effects include headache and tiredness. with hep c behind me, i feel free... ...fearless... ...and there's no looking back, because i am cured. talk to your doctor about mavyret. (kickstart my heart by motley crue)) (truck honks) (wheels screeching) (clapping)
(sound of can hitting bag and bowl) (clapping) always there in crunch time. hey, who are you? oh, hey jeff, i'm a car thief... what?! i'm here to steal your car because, well, that's my job. what? what?? what?! (laughing) what?? what?! what?! [crash] what?! haha, it happens. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, paying for this could feel like getting robbed twice. so get allstate... and be better protected from mayhem... like me. ♪ it's been nearly a year since the death of barbara bush, the matriarch of the bush political dynasty. both the wife and mother of presidents, she was an iconic figure in the republican party for decades. remembered for her dry sense of humor.
>> please notice the hair, the makeup, designer clothes. i want you to watch me all week. and remember. you may never see it again. >> mrs. bush, would you like to see your son jeb run? >> he's by far the best qualified man, but, no, i really don't. there are other people out there that are very qualified and we've had enough bushes. >> who knows, somewhere out in this audience may even be someone who will one day follow in my footsteps and preside over the white house as the president's spouse, and i wish him well. >> well, in the final months of her life, the former first lady said she no longer considered herself a republican. in a new biography that offers a definitive look at her life author susan page writes, "with trump's rise she saw it as a
party she could not support, a party she no longer recognized, even as one of her grandsons was on the ballot down in texas." according to page, bush saw trump as a symbol of greed. trump responded in an interview with the "washington times" saying i've heard she was nasty to me, but she should be. look what i did to her sons. referring to comments he made about former president george w. bush and jeb bush, the one he ran against in 2016. joining me now is the author, susan page, washington bureau chief of "usa today," frequent guest on "hardball" and most importantly, author of "the matriarch: barbara bush and the making of an american dynasty." thank you so much. susan, you're a great person to have you on our show. i want to congratulate you on this book. i think the most interesting thing right now is how the life of barbara bush relates to right now, today, in terms of the republican party and to president trump. she really couldn't stand trump. tell us about it. >> well, right. and it's true, president trump is right that she resented the
attacks he made on jeb bush during the 2016 republican primaries and also the fact that, of course, he defeated jeb bush in the race for the republican nomination, but her antipathy for donald trump went back decades. i read in her diaries in 1990 that she wrote that donald trump was a symbol of the greed of the 1980s, and that antipathy just grew when he got involved in politics. she was quite stunned when he managed to be elected president. >> what about the countdown clock? i'd never heard about that until your book. tell us about that. >> well, you know, to those around her it was no secret that she didn't like president trump. a friend in kennebunkport gave her one of those digital clocks that counts down the days and the hours and the seconds until president trump's term will be over. she put it on her bedside table in in kennebunkport and liked it so much she carried it back to houston when the summer was over, and it was sitting on her bedside table until the day she
died. >> wow. anyway, not everyone adored barbara bush, of course. your book describes the rocky relationship she had with another first lady, nancy reagan. "nancy reagan's antipathy for barbara bush, hidden from public view, created grievances behind the scenes that would persist. i don't know why, but she really hated us." in 1985, the bushes' names were crossed out not once but twice as invitees for the prestigious white house dinner the reagans hosted for prince charles and princess diana. that was the number one thing to go to and she didn't want to see them there. >> you know, amazingly she crossed out their names off the guest list and then the deputy white house chief of staff, who was her closest ally in the white house, called her and said you cannot cross the vice president off the list for this dinner. and she said, just watch me. >> well, why? what's that about?
what did you figure out? >> you know, i think part of -- part of it is that their husbands ran against each other in 1980 for the nomination. there were some scars from that. i think they were so different in their priorities and their personalities. barbara bush was not a -- barbara bush put family above all. the wonderful relationship that the bushes had with their children and grandchildren. the reagans had quite a dysfunctional family and i think they looked at each other and saw someone they didn't recognize, someone they didn't like, someone who wasn't like them. >> talk about the, you know, i've learned a lot about pat nixon, who was called plastic pat in the old days. from what i've been able to figure out is quite an extraordinary person. tell me about how barbara was also, barbara bush was always in the background. she didn't dye her hair. she didn't try to compete, as you say, in the fashion industry with nancy. what was the role that she played that you found in the lives of their husband and son? >> it changed over time. you know, initially in 1980
during bush's first run for the presidency, she was not a central figure. she was not seen as an asset in the campaign, but by 1988 she had a voice that bush was listening to. she was a critical voice in encouraging him to do some negative ads against opponents that helped him get elected. she said i think it would be all right, george, when he was reluctant to air them. by 1992, george bush was practically trying to ride her coattails in his reelection bid. she was more popular than he was. >> let me ask you about that campaign. that was a pretty rough campaign by george bush, the first george bush in 1980. he talked about michael dukakis wouldn't find teachers for not -- for not leading their classes in the pledge of allegiance. went after the aclu. it was a rough, nasty campaign. did she say go that way? >> i'm not sure she said go that way on all those particulars, but on the issue of the prison furlough program in massachusetts, there was a
controversy within the campaign about whether to air an ad about it. this one the very controversial willie horton ad that was aired by an independent group, but it was still a pretty tough ad. she argued that the prison furlough program was something that dukakis supported. it did turn out to be catastrophic. so it was fair to attack him for that. she had a generally -- she was comfortable with combat in a way -- i don't mean military combat. i mean she was comfortable with political combat and back and forth in a way that sometimes george bush was reluctant to do. and he listened to her. her permission that it would be all right to air these ads mattered to him in the final decision about whether to air them. >> well, a surprisingly political book by susan page by susan page about barbara bush who we think about as a noncombatant. turns out she very much was in the fight "the matriarch." thank you so much, susan. >> thank you, chris. coming up, which 2020 democratic contender has the
we're all under one roof now. congratulations. thank you. how many kids? my two. his three. along with two dogs and jake, our new parrot. that is quite the family. quite a lot of colleges to pay for though. a lot of colleges. you get any financial advice? yeah, but i'm pretty sure it's the same plan they sold me before. well your situation's totally changed now. right, right. how 'bout a plan that works for 5 kids, 2 dogs and jake over here? that would be great. that would be great. that okay with you, jake? get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change from td ameritrade investment management.
it seems to me that the democrats have to make a basic decision next year, to pick a candidate they genuinely believe will make the best american president. that means someone who makes the country proud again, of course. a leader who can truly lead, who builds on the vote he or she gets in november to a larger level of support by inaugural
day and continues to grow a larger popular base a year into his or her service. is this asking too much to have a president who actually rises in public support, not one that continues to falter like trump? in a partisan sense, i'd like this new leader of the democratic party to restore and rebuild the patriotic nature of the party, to reconnect that traditional love for this country with the belief we are meeting its challenges, its new challenges to build a sense among the boomers and the younger generation that we're in this together. in other words, in democratic terms, an un-trump president who doesn't end his or her presidency with the same backing he or she began with like trump and his 30-something bitter enders. which candidates can we see having the aptitude and the will to get majority approval? because absent that capability, the next president will be the second one in a row to fail, promising all sorts of stuff isn't going to turn stuff towards that direction. what will get something moving is a president able to grow support well beyond just enough to squeak through on election
day. who has the analyst bility to g kamala, beto, joe, bernie, pete, elizabeth? who else. to pick a leader, not just another protester like donald trump. a protester. that's "hardball" for now. "all in" with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on "all in" -- >> the powers of the president to protect our country are very substantial and will not be questioned. >> a full-scale purge at dhs. >> that is a major event. >> as the president reportedly turns over immigration policy to stephen miller, and reportedly ordered the renewal and expansion of family separation. >> this administration did not create a policy of separating families at the border. >> tonight, 2020 candidate kamala harris on kirstjen nielsen's departure and what comes next. >> do you dispute that