tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC January 25, 2013 12:00am-1:00am EST
operating in it and we've been doing it well. >> all right. goldie taylor, thank you for joining us tonight. appreciate it so much. that's "the ed show." i'm ed schultz. the "rachel maddow show" starts right now. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, ed. thank you, my friend. >> thank you. >> and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. it is a weird paradox, in 21st century american politics. a lot more people call themselves conservatives than call themselves liberals. but liberal ideas are really widely popular. in fact, a lot of people who would never call themselves liberal are very much in favor of liberal policies. it's been true for a long time. but if you take a current example, take for example president obama's inaugural address this week. conservatives of course were outraged that it was such a liberal speech. liberals were delighted that it was such a liberal speech. and everybody agreed that it was such a profoundly liberal speech that the president gave for his
second inaugural address. and it wasn't just liberal in the abstract. it was liberal in the specific, in the sense that he proposed and endorsed a whole bunch of liberal policy ideas. like for example, his endorsement in the speech of marriage equality. it was a big moment in the speech, right? because no president had ever talked about gay people before, ever before in any inaugural address. it was also a landmark thing for this president, who did not publicly support same-sex marriage rights until well into his time being president. but there it was right in the inaugural address, calling for 01:12:20: marriage equality. right there in the inaugural address. that is freaking liberal. also, that is the majority view held by most americans. the nbc/"wall street journal" poll that came out last month polled on same-sex marriage rights, a majority of americans support same-sex marriage rights. so it's liberal, but it's also what the majority believes. same thing on immigration. part of the reason everybody
called the inaugural such a liberal speech is because the president had a big multisentence, full-throated endorsement of immigration reform. even if you came here illegally, there should be some path by which you should be able to seek citizenship to become legal, to be officially welcomed and brought into this country. that is freaking liberal, right? it is also the majority view of most americans. nbc/"wall street journal" poll from this month, from january, finds that a majority of americans support giving illegal immigrants the ability to apply for legal status. it's a liberal idea. it's also what most americans believe. the other reason everybody thought the inaugural address was so capital l liberal, liberal, liberal was because of the president's shout out by name of medicare and social security, which in the beltway are horrible, embarrassing profligacies which are mostly good for counting who counts as a serious person in washington because you cannot be a serious person in washington according to the beltway unless you want to get rid of those programs or at least you see those programs as a problem that needs to be addressed. president obama in his inaugural
not only name-checked medicare and social security in a positive way, defended them. he said he will support them and that they are good for the country. the only people other than a liberal like barack obama who likes social security and medicare is everybody. really, it's only in washington where these are controversial programs. if you ask the country, the country's kind of in love with social security and medicare and thinks that they work and thinks that we should not cut them. broadly speaking, most americans do not call themselves liberals if you ask. but broadly speaking, most americans are in favor of liberal ideas. the marquee signifiers of liberal policy are broadly accepted as good ideas by most of the country. and that has been true for a long time. but the gears that you see clinking over each other, the gears that you see churning in democratic politics right now, the work that is being done in democratic politics right now, led by president obama at the start of his second term is this effort to turn what has been long-standing majority support for liberal policies into appreciation that those policies
aren't just individual free-floating technocratically good ideas that we agree on, those policies come from a world view and a problem-solving approach that is in fact the governing philosophy of this country. we're a liberal country. we are not a center-right country the way the right always wants to tell us. we are a country where liberal policies are widely popular and, frankly, at the national level we express that right now by mostly voting for democrats. by a lot. that's the portrait of the country that the president was painting this week in his second inaugural, in tying this list of what get described as liberal policies to fundamental centrist, widely acknowledged, basically universal american values. >> we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that
among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. today we continue a never-ending journey to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time. for history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident they have never been self-executing. that while freedom is a gift from god it must be secured by his people here on earth. >> and then president obama goes on in the speech to list as examples of the ways that we must secure those american values now in our time, he lists the specific policies of equal pay for equal work and marriage equality and election reform and immigration reform and a policy response to help us reduce gun
violence. >> our journey is not complete until all our children, from the streets of detroit to the hills of appalachia to the quiet lanes of newtown know that they are cared for and cherished and always safe from harm. that is our generation's task. to make these words, these rights, these values, of life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness real for every american. >> tying the policies which he is associated with and which are associated with his party and which are associated with a liberal idea of american governance to the basic fundamental ideas of what america is. that was the whole point, right? as with the other issues that president obama name-checked so
specifically in his inaugural address this week, the things that got his speech branded as so liberal this week, what president obama was alluding to there at the end by bringing up gun violence in his inaugural address is a set of policies that he and vice president biden have proposed for dealing with gun policies. and these policies get labeled liberal. but it turns out they are very popular. they are very, very, very widely popular. gallup just did a national poll on the whole list of proposal as that president obama and vice president biden have put forward on gun violence. bang high-capacity ammo clips. that gets majority support in this country. 54%. reinstating and strengthening the assault weapons ban we had for ten years that expired back in '04. majority support. look at that. 60% of the country wants that. making it so only the military and law enforcement can have so-called cop killer bullets, those armor-piercing bullets. 67% of the country supports
that. and the numbers get higher from there. emergency response plans in schools. 69% support it. more cops. 70% support it. cracking down on straw purchases, right? where people buy a gun because they don't clear the background check but then they're really buying it for somebody who won't clear the background check. 75% of people support cracking down on that. more training for responding to shooters and violent incidents in schools. 79% of people support that. more resources for mental health programs, especially for younger people, 82% of people support that. these are all of the things that have been proposed by president obama and vice president biden, right? and the crown jewel of what they're proposing? look at this. it's the most popular one of all. it's the centerpiece of their proposals. and it is the most popular thing of all. requiring criminal background checks for all gun sales. not just for 60% of gun sales, which is what we have now in this country, but for all gun sales. 91% of the country supports that. and that is the centerpiece of what the obama administration is proposing for guns, for gun reform, background checks for everybody, 91% support. and that is that number that is
consistent across polls. the big "new york times" national poll on this last month had it at 92%, not 91%. so you can split those hairs if you want. but basically, it's kind of unanimous. the "washington post" did roughly the same polling. again, a national poll on these policies. but when the "washington post" did it, they broke it down by party, which ends up being really useful. look at the support for the stuff from republicans specifically. the only one that flips, that drops below majority support, the only one where republicans do not give it majority support even though the country as a whole does, is specifically the idea of banning assault rifles again. but still, that one's close. even among republicans, 45% of republicans think we ought to be banning assault weapons again. that's the only one that flips. all the rest of them still majority support even from republicans. banning high-capacity ammunition clips? republicans want to do that too by a big number. 59% of republicans. the big kahuna, background checks for everybody, even at gun shows, everywhere?
republicans are hugely in favor of that. 89% of republicans want that. what president obama has proposed to do on gun reform is very popular, even among republican voters. when you ask them about the things that the president's proposing, pretty much republicans think these things are good ideas, we ought to be doing them, they are in favor. and then the same "washington post" poll asked republicans, okay, broadly speaking, do you like what president obama is proposing on gun reform? and republicans said no, we hate it. after they said they support all the individual proposals, they said, well, do you like the guy who's proposing all these individual proposals that you liked? no, we hate those ideas. and that is insane. they like all the component parts of it. they like all these ideas. but then when these ideas that they like are proposed, they say they are against them because the person proposing them is president obama. that is insane. that is mindless. right? how do you make constructive policy in that kind of environment? people support the policy until they hear who else supports it and then they think they might
be against it. how do you make policy like that? well, today the senator who got the assault weapons ban passed in 1994, which was also a time that nobody said it could happen, that senator came forward again and said she would do it again this year. california senator dianne feinstein, who herself became mayor of san francisco because the serving mayor of san francisco at the time was shot to death, senator feinstein today at this press conference made her case. >> today my colleagues and i are introducing a bill to prohibit the sale, transfer, manufacture, and importation of assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices that can accept more than ten rounds. we have tried to recognize legal hunting rights. we have tried to recognize legal defense rights. we have tried to recognize the right of a citizen to legally possess a weapon. no weapon is taken from anyone. the purpose is to dry up the supply of these weapons over
time. >> i've watched the slaughter of so many people and i've met with so many victims over the years. and in congress nobody wanted to touch the issue. and the last several years the massacres were going on more and more. and going through it, i kept saying, what's wrong with all of us? how many people have to be killed before we do something? >> i will never forget the sights and sounds of that day as parents emerged from that firehouse, learning that their 5 and 6-year-old children would not be coming home that night. >> the gun lobby has said over and over again in the last several weeks that this is just a feel-good piece of legislation. you know what?
they're right about that. it would feel really good if allison and charlotte and daniel and olivia and josephine and anna had gotten to enjoy christmas with their parents. you'd feel really good if dylan and madeline and catherine and chase and jesse and james took the bus to school this morning. you'd feel really good if grace and emily and jack and noah and caroline and jessica and avielle and ben were alive today. you'd feel really good if parents all across this country didn't have to wake up every morning worrying that without action that their kids were at risk just like those kids in newtown. >> senator chris murphy of connecticut, who before winning election to the senate in this past year he was the congressman who represented newtown. joining us now is not only connecticut senator chris murphy but actually the entire senate delegation from the state of
connecticut, senator murphy joined tonight by his colleague senator richard blumenthal, who you saw speak just before him. gentlemen, i really appreciate you both being here tonight. thank you so much for your time. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> senator blumenthal, let me start with you. you said today that this is going to be a hard fight, that nobody should think this is going to be easy. given how hard you think this is going to be, what do you think is the best way to fight for it? >> the best way to fight for it is to recall those images that senator murphy and i recounted today. the images of parents emerging from that firehouse, the community grappling with that grief, the slaughter that is wracked upon america by these assault weapons and the high-capacity magazines, and the need for banning them. and mobilizing and galvanizing support to overcome the nra and other entrenched interests, which no doubt, no question will fight them, make no mistake, there will be a fight.
but as you said, the centerpiece really is a comprehensive program that has to include the background checks. i propose background checks on ammunition purchases as well as extended background checks on firearms purchases so as to cover that 40% of private sales and gun show sales that are not now covered and a comprehensive program of preventing gun violence has support from the majority of americans. we need to make that support focused on washington, d.c. so our congressional representatives, whether in the senate or the house, cannot escape the brunt of that opinion. >> senator murphy, let me turn to you for a moment. you represented newtown as newtown's congressman. now as senator you represent the entire state of connecticut as their senator. connecticut is a small state, but it is a diverse state. it is both diverse in terms of urban and rural areas. it's diverse in terms of its population.
and in terms of its political views. how do you talk to your constituents who feel very strongly about gun rights and very wary about gun control, that this isn't going to be something that's going to hurt their freedoms, it's going to help them and help their fellow citizens? >> listen, every decision you that make on legislation is a balancing act. and on this one the test is pretty clear. do you want to pass a law that's going to keep more 6 and 7-year-old kids alive in the future, or do you want to add some convenience to gun owners who want to reload a little bit less frequently or want to pretend that they're soldiers by owning military-style assault weapons? when you pose that question to people in connecticut and frankly across this country as you've shown by the surveys you that talked about earlier, people side with the 6 and 7-year-olds every single time.
and the fact is that that's true of non-gun owners and gun owners. i can't tell you the number of responsible gun owners in connecticut who have come up to me over the course of the last month and said let's get something done, i don't need these kind of weapons or those kind of cartridges in order to enjoy my sport. and i think we're going to find that all across the country, that there's going to be a pretty impressive coalition that wants to get this done. >> senator blumenthal, when you just talked about honoring the experience of newtown, remembering those images, remembering what has created this political initiative, doing something about this at a time when i think people wouldn't have in advance noted we'd be doing a gun control agenda right now, what's the minimum to you in terms of policy that would honor the experience of newtown? what's your single highest priority, or what do you think is the least that we ought to do to responsibly respond to what happened? >> a ban on the assault weapons and high-capacity magazines is
very important. but background checks i think are common ground where everyone can come together, whether it's the background checks on firearms purchases and i believe very, very strongly on ammunition sales right now. you can walk into a walmart, buy a shopping cart full of ammunition without any background check, without answering any questions. even if you're a convicted felon, a fugitive, a domestic abuser, a dangerously mentally ill person. to make our neighborhoods safer we need those background checks. but also mental health initiatives. today i helped to introduce a measure providing, as it's called, first aid mental health assistance for the school boards and local officials. i think we need to emphasize mental health and school security. so it really has to be a combined and comprehensive strategy. there's no single solution. and i would just also say in
response to your earlier question, the most important allies in this effort are the law enforcement community. and i say it as someone who served as attorney general of the state of connecticut for 20 years, as a federal prosecutor, united states attorney for 4 1/2 years. the guys who are most eloquent and most compelling on this subject are the ones on the front lines, in the trenches, who see that they're outgunned very often. they told me in newtown that they could not probably have stopped that shooter even wearing the body armor that they did because of the assault weapon that he was firing. >> wow. senator murphy, one last question for you. in thinking about important allies, as senator blumenthal was just saying there, and how to move forward and who speaks with authority here, one of the things that we have heard from washington is that as the obama campaign turns its campaign
apparatus into a political effort to try to marshal support for some of the president's political priorities, they may try to work on this issue. they may essentially try to turn their campaign apparatus loose on both immigration reform and on the issue of gun reform. do you think that this is the kind of issue on which a grassroots effort like that could be particularly effective? >> it's the only way that this gets done in the end. listen, i wish this weren't about politics, but it is, right? this is ultimately going to really come down to a question for republicans in the house of representatives. i think we can get something strong through the senate. but in the house republicans are going to have to decide whether they're going to pay a political price for standing with the gun manufacturers and against millions of families across this country who want to get this done. so we are going to need a massive national grassroots effort, and we are also going to have to make republicans understand that the nra, who they have long feared, who they
have allowed to essentially lead them around by the earlobe, just isn't what they used to be. the nra won 20% of the elections that they participated in in this last election. we need a grassroots effort to try to support republicans who want to do the right thing. we need to convince them that there's a price to pay if they do the right thing. and we've got to take on the nra to try to debunk this myth that if you cross them there's a political price to pay. in fact, the opposite was true in the last election. the nra barely could win elections around this country. they just aren't the force that they once were. >> senator chris murphy, senator richard blumenthal, the senate delegation from the state of connecticut. the whole country is looking to connecticut for leadership, and i think also for moral resonance on this issue. and everybody's counting on you. seeing you guys here together tonight is a real treat for us to have you both here. thank you. >> thank you. >> thanks. >> i appreciate it. all right. after years of gridlock congress finally had a chance to fix an enormous problem today. had a chance. fix the filibuster day was today. you want to know what happened? stick around. this year. in that time there've been some good days. and some difficult ones. but, through it all, we've persevered, supporting some of the biggest ideas in modern history. so why should our anniversary matter to you?
because for 200 years, we've been helping ideas move from ambition to achievement. and the next great idea could be yours. ♪ email marketing from constant contact reaches people in a place they're checking every day -- their inbox. and it gives you the tools to create custom emails that drive business. it's just one of the ways constant contact can help you grow your small business. sign up for your free trial today at constantcontact.com/try.
strong. on monday, though, they were closer to 6,000 of them. just for the day. now, the force was augmented on monday by more than 2,000 extra police officers who were flown in from 86 other jurisdictions around the country. in addition to them, 6,000 national guardsmen and women were deployed to d.c. just for monday. some of them were even sworn in as special police officers in washington just for this assignment. the security presence in d.c. for an inauguration these days is just massive. the parade route and everything else is just unimaginably fit with cops and soldiers and security personnel. it's really all you see. and according to the capitol police, with all those extra security personnel on hand on monday and with roughly a million somewhat ecstatic people crowding the streets for the inauguration, inevitably there were some arrests. specifically, there were three arrests in total the whole day. one person arrested for an outstanding warrant. one person arrested for public drinking.
and one other person arrested specifically for this. ah. anti-abortion protester stuck in a tree. at first apparently he was not very high up in the tree. police tried to talk him down. that didn't work, and he screamed his lungs out through the whole inaugural ceremony and especially through the president's speech. police decided that when they couldn't talk him out of the tree they would go get him as if he were a kitten. they tried to get a fire truck to drive to the tree and raise its ladder to go get him. but the fire truck couldn't get through the police barricades. so then the police brought over their own ladder to the tree. and that's when the guy climbed really high up in the tree, 40 feet up. and that's where he got stuck. 40 feet up. stuck there for five hours. and they just left him be. and when he finally found his way down, he was cold and he was arrested and charged with violating a previous order
strikes, some more anti-abortion folks, and some other people, including those people from that church in kansas who try purposefully to offend and provoke everyone around them so they end up getting media coverage for it but we do not cover them on this program as a matter of principle. d.c. protests wax and wane with public opinion and with activist fervor about whatever is going on in washington at any given time. sometimes people are particularly inventive or particularly disruptive or particularly naked and therefore they get special attention.
but basically, heckling and protest is kind of an accepted and expected part of doing business in our nation's capital. most people who do business in washington don't pay protesters any particular mind. and that is why it was notable today and i think important when at john kerry's secretary of state confirmation hearing everybody else kind of rolled their eyes and scoffed when an anti-war protester interrupted the hearing. everybody else kind of blew it off. ah, business as usual in washington. but john kerry did not blow it off. >> so thank you, mr. chairman and members of the committee. i know there's a lot of ground to cover -- >> we're tilling thousands of people and the middle east is not a threat to us. when is it going to be enough? when are enough people going to be killed? i'm tired of my friends in the middle east dying. i don't know if they're going to be alive the next day. we need peace with iran. >> well, you know, i'll tell
you, mr. chairman, when i first came to washington and testified i obviously was testifying as part of a group of people who came here to have their voices heard. and that is above all what this place is about. so i respect i think the woman who was voicing her concerns about that part of the world. and every one of you have traveled there. some of you were there recently. senator mccain, you were just there. you were in a refugee camp, and i know you heard this kind of thing. people measure what we do. and in a way that's a good exclamation point to my testimony. >> in 1971, before he was senator john kerry, navy lieutenant john kerry appeared before the senate foreign relations committee, the same committee he sat before today, to talk about the war he had just returned from, which was the vietnam war. john kerry famously protested against that war. and now the people who are protesting against the current war and maybe the future ones are protesting at his hearing, at his confirmation.
some brokerage firms are. but way too many aren't. some of the ones that push mutual funds with their names on them -- aren't. why? because selling their funds makes them more money. which makes you wonder -- isn't that a conflict? am i in the best fund for me, or them? search "proprietary mutual funds". yikes, it's best for them. then go to e-trade.
you need to feel better about politics in particular, you will need to feel better after we get through the details of what happened in the senate today. but i have just the thing. i have a tonic for you coming up in our last story tonight. it is good. it is cute. it's about politics. and it's not a sad trombone. i swear. that's coming up. ♪ aww man. [ male announcer ] returns are easy with free pickup from the u.s. postal service. we'll even drop off boxes if you need them. visit usps.com pay, print, and have it picked up for free. any time of year. ♪ nice sweater. thank you. ♪
to compete on the global stage. what we need are people prepared for the careers of our new economy. by 2025 we could have 20 million jobs without enough college graduates to fill them. that's why at devry university, we're teaming up with companies like cisco to help make sure everyone is ready with the know-how we need for a new tomorrow. [ male announcer ] make sure america's ready. make sure you're ready. at devry.edu/knowhow. ♪ looks like you're in a pickle. yeah. can you get me out of it ? just so happens i know a chap... book any flight and hotel together and get access to our free personal concierge service. any need, any question, we're on call 24/7. so, i'm working on a cistern intake valve, and the guy hands me a locknut wrench. no way! i'm like, what is this, a drainpipe slipknot? wherever your business takes you, nobody keeps you on the road like progressive commercial auto.
[ flo speaking japanese ] [ shouting in japanese ] we work wherever you work. now, that's progressive. call or click today. if we took the already great sentra apart and completely reimagined it with best-in-class combined mpg and more interior room than corolla and civic and a technology suite with bluetooth, navigation, and other handy stuff? yeah, that would be cool. introducing the all-new nissan sentra. it's our most innovative sentra ever. nissan. innovation that excites. now get a $169 per month lease on a new nissan sentra, plus $500 bonus cash. ♪
why is it that everything takes 60 votes now? i mean, it used to be 60 votes was a headline. if somebody forced 60 votes, that meant they were filibustering and that meant that they were taking an unusually strong stand against something. now it's 60 votes even for routine -- >> rachel, this has to change. it's wrong what they're doing because it's never happened before. the republicans just this time have abused the system, and it's going to have to change. we're going to have to look at ways to change that because there should not be 60 votes in the senate. >> that was democratic senate majority leader harry reid during an interview with me in his home state of nevada in october 2010. this has to change, there should not be a 60-vote threshold in the senate. and then this was the headline tads in the "washington post." harry reid -- "i'm not personally at this stage ready to get rid of the 60-vote threshold." yeah. also this. >> if there were ever a time when tom udall and jeff merkley were prophetic, it's tonight.
these two young fine senators said it was time we change the rules in the senate and we didn't. they were right. the rest of us were wrong. or most of us anyway. what a shame. >> that was harry reid on the senate floor in may saying progressive senators tom udall and jeff merkley who were working to reform the filibuster they were right, he should have listened to their call to reform the senate rules, they wright and he was wrong not to listen to them. they were right and this was today. "progressive senators working dramatically to alter senate rules were defeated thursday when senate majority leader harry reid and his counterpart republican leader mitch mcconnell set to announce a series of reforms on the senate floor that fall far short of their demands. one more? one more. >> we're going to change the rules. we cannot continue in this way. so i hope we can get something that the republicans will work with us on but it won't be a
handshake. we tried that last time. it didn't work. >> that was harry reid at the senate in december saying any deal to reform the filibuster would not be a handshake deal. today a "handshake agreement" is how roll call newspaper described a number of the filibuster reforms that harry reid agreed to with mitch mcconnell. wow. harry reid. yeah. this was the day everybody had been wait for in terms of changing how the senate operates. and if you hear sad trombones, that's why. on election day this year americans voted overwhelmingly to re-elect president obama four more years. that same day people also voted to re-elect senate democrats and to send a large number of them to congress, more than the republicans. more senate democrats than republicans which put harry reid in charge of the senate for another two years. and the very next day after the election harry reid in his first post-election press conference said that he was going to fix the unprecedented problem we have in washington with how republicans have broken the
united states senate through abusing the rules. >> it looks like there are going to be a number of -- many more filibusters on motions to proceed. do you think -- do you have any plans to change the filibuster? >> yes, i do. i've said so publicly, and i continue to feel that way. i think that the rules have been abused and that we're going to work to change them. >> first press conference, day after the election, harry reid saying that going forward things are going to change. specifically, this was going to change. the de facto rule that republicans have gerrymandered in the senate for lack of a better term that pretty much everything requires 60 votes to pass now. that has never been how things have worked in this country. i mean, constitutionally it takes a supermajority to impeach a president or ratify a treaty or amend the constitution but not to pass an ordinary bill.
ordinary bill passage should just take a majority. but republicans have made it take a supermajority. and harry reid the day after the election said he was going to change that. and that wasn't a new promise from him. he didn't pull that out of thin air. he's been telegraphing for months that should democrats retain control of the senate they were going to fix the rules. they were going to do away with this whole 60 votes for everything nonsense. >> it can be done if obama's re-elected and i still have the majority, we can do it with a simple majority at the beginning of the congress. >> think the president would go along with that? >> damn, betcha. >> would you make that commitment if barack obama and the democrats keep the senate, if barack obama gets re-elected and you keep the senate? >> i don't know how many people watch c-span on every given day but i've said so before everybody there. that's what i would do. >> turns out a lot of people watch c-span and if anybody was watching c-span tonight about an hour ago you would have seen harry reid there not at all fixing the problem that he has been saying for months now, for years now that he was going to fix. tonight the senate passed a filibuster reform compromise that harry reid reached with republican minority leader mitch mcconnell. here's how the great ezra klein at the "washington post" summed
up what they agreed to and what was voted in in the senate tonight. "reid and mcconnell have come to a deal on filibuster reform. the deal is this -- the filibuster will not be reformed." what harry reid and mitch mcconnell agreed to today was a package of small changes that will marginally speed up business in the senate and will allow bills to be debated without as many opportunities to obstruct them. it will reduce the number of hours the senate has to wait before confirming judges and some cabinet nominees. but there is no challenge at all here to the minority's ability to force a supermajority vote on routine business as a matter of routine. the problem in the senate, right? has been that they are not able to get anything done. the improvement on that today is that now they're not going to be able to get anything done faster. nobody was ever talking about taking away the filibuster completely. idea was to make it something that hurt a little, that actually required some commitment, that if you wanted to block something it was going to have to become a priority for
you, you were going to have to do it in a way that took up your time, that put you in a position of having to explain why you were doing it, that meant you couldn't get on with all the other business you wanted to work on in your little senator life because you were doing this other thing that you had to prioritize. because it was something that was important enough to you to say you know what, america, majority rule should not apply here, this is really important and i'm willing to explain why and take up time to prove it. that was the whole idea. and nothing has been done toward making that happen at all. it will still be a routine 60-vote supermajority for everything. and this is now it for two years. the one baby, baby, baby, baby, baby step toward actually shifting the burden onto people who want to block majority rule consists today of mitch mcconnell and harry reid agreeing between them that they will ask senators in their parties who are going to filibuster if please maybe they would consider going down to the senate floor and please consider explaining themselves when they do it. possibly, if they want to. the agreement from mitch mcconnell that republicans --
the agreement with mitch mcconnell that the republicans will even ask each other to consider doing that, that agreement is of course a handshake agreement. >> it won't be a handshake. we tried that last time. it didn't work. >> yeah. it's a handshake. there's a handshake deal this time, which is the only progress toward getting anything done. it's a handshake deal. and a handshake deal did not work last time and that should have told you something. and that is the apex of senator harry reid's achievement today after those months, those years of promises that this time he was really going to do it. but hey, at least we'll be able to see them get nothing done faster now. the stuff that they can't do anything on is just going to fly by from here on out. so we have that speed to look forward to. t a fortune. nobody said an all-in-one had to be bulky. or that you had to print from your desk. at least, nobody said it to us. introducing the business smart inkjet all-in-one series
from brother. easy to use. it's the ultimate combination of speed, small size, and low-cost printing. is bigger than we think ... sometimelike the flu.fer from with aches, fever and chills- the flu's a really big deal. so why treat it like it's a little cold? there's something that works differently than over-the-counter remedies. prescription tamiflu attacks the flu virus at its source. so don't wait. call your doctor right away. tamiflu is prescription medicine for treating the flu in adults and children one year and older whose flu symptoms started within the last two days. before taking tamiflu tell your doctor if you're pregnant, nursing. have serious health conditions,
or take other medicines. if you develop an allergic reaction, a severe rash, or signs of unusual behavior, stop taking tamiflu and call your doctor immediately. children and adolescents in particular may be at an increased risk of seizures, confusion or abnormal behavior. the most common side effects are mild to moderate nausea and vomiting. the flu comes on fast, so ask your doctor about tamiflu. prescription for flu. like gas station sushi. or super cheap car insurance. and then there are good decisions. like esurance. their coverage counselor helps you choose the right coverage for you at a great price. [ stomach growls ] esurance. now backed by allstate. click or call. esurance. now backed by allstate. i have obligations. cute tobligations, but obligations.g. i need to rethink the core of my portfolio.
what i really need is sleep. introducing the ishares core, building blocks for the heart of your portfolio. find out why 9 out of 10 large professional investors choose ishares for their etfs. ishares by blackrock. call 1-800-ishares for a prospectus which includes investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. read and consider it carefully before investing. risk includes possible loss of principal.
on this vote the yeas are 78, the nays are 16. the 60-vote threshold having been achieved, the resolution is agreed to. >> on this vote the yeas are 86 and the nays are 9. 2/3 of those voting for adoption have voted in the affirmative. and the resolution is agreed to. >> two votes tonight. two arguably missed opportunities to do something substantive about this. the fact that now for the first time in our history practically every bill that comes before the united states senate requires a
supermajority of 60 votes in order to pass. that did not get fixed today. it got changed. but it doesn't seem to have been fixed. joining us now is democratic senator sherrod brown of ohio. senator brown, thank you for being here. i appreciate your being willing to talk to us about this. >> sure. of course. >> am i wrong to think that there's not going to be a big change to what we've come to accept as normal, which is republicans requiring a 60-vote supermajority on everything in the senate? >> i think you were generally right. i think that there will be -- i mean, the steps -- we didn't do as much as many of us wanted to do. i think it's small progress. i think it will -- the senate will be -- will work a little better than it did.
working with a group of people that will find least to slow things down. >> i think the disappointment from people, from congress watchers and people who are not on capitol hill is that everybody thought democratic senators were fed up with that 60 vote supermajority threshold for everything. was that perception just wrong? do senators not mind it as much as we thought they did? >> i think a lot of us did.
i am not blaming any of my colleagues in particular, but there were not enough to take the bigger steps that senator merkley, senator udoh wanted to take. >> this is not to deflect what you said. if you listen to the state of the inaugural address, one of the things that i took out of that is that we will see a president of the united states use his executive powers as much as he is under the constitution in a more aggressive way than last time. we still would have had problems in house, obviously. i am not begging off the question, but i think that the president -- you will see the president used the executive powers that are within his constitutional legal authority. much of the progressive agenda will be driven that way. even if we could get things through the senate, which we will do from time to time, judges and appointments, i hope,
would not have gotten through the house. good news coming that way. that is what i heard in the inaugural address. the president wants to move on climate change, voting change, wants to move on gun safety. i think he will figure things out. i know the white house is looking at those kinds of things, labor law. larry cohen was talking about some of this earlier, the ed show. i am hopeful the white house sees a path to move the country forward. >> do you think immigration and gun reform, which the president has put forward as it first. for the first term that they can move in the senate? >> i think immigration can move in the senate. a number of things we can get in the senate because we have a way of getting over the 60 votes or speeding up the process. the house still doesn't move on it, so perhaps immigration gets through this. if it doesn't get through the
house, the president will use executive powers that he has. it isn't ever as good invoking the executive powers, executive orders and other things. it will be pretty hard. there will be a lot of public pressure, as the president pushes us. i think they will use the next four years, use the bully pulpit. the republicans are going to say he is out campaigning. i think he is pushing his agenda. he needs to go over the heads of republicans to do it. i am pretty optimistic this will be a pretty activist presidency more in that since then it was in the first time. >> sherrod brown of ohio, i like talking to you about stuff i am excited about and i like talking to you about stuff that i am not excited about because you are such a straight talker. >> thank you. >> we will be right back. r keys, geico's emergency roadside assistance is there 24/7. oh dear, i got a flat tire.
hmmm. uh... yeah, can you find a take where it's a bit more dramatic on that last line, yeah? yeah i got it right here. someone help me!!! i have a flat tire!!! well it's good... good for me. what do you think? geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. nothing. are you stealing our daughter's school supplies and taking them to work? no, i was just looking for my stapler and my... this thing. i save money by using fedex ground and buy my own supplies. that's a great idea. i'm going to go... we got clients in today. [ male announcer ] save on ground shipping at fedex office. ♪ [ indistinct shouting ]
[ male announcer ] time and sales data. split-second stats. [ indistinct shouting ] ♪ it's so close to the options floor... [ indistinct shouting, bell dinging ] ...you'll bust your brain box. ♪ all on thinkorswim from td ameritrade. ♪ from td ameritrade. iimagine living your life withss less chronic low back pain.. imagine you with less pain. cymbalta can help. cymbalta is fda-approved to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. one non-narcotic pill a day, every day, can help reduce this pain. tell your doctor right away if your mood worsens, you have unusual changes in mood or behavior or thoughts of suicide. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. cymbalta is not for children under 18. people taking maois, linezolid or thioridazine or with uncontrolled glaucoma should not take cymbalta. taking it with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin or blood
thinners may increase bleeding risk. severe liver problems, some fatal, were reported. signs include abdominal pain and yellowing skin or eyes. tell your doctor about all your medicines, including those for migraine and while on cymbalta, call right away if you have high fever, confusion and stiff muscles or serious allergic skin reactions like blisters, peeling rash, hives, or mouth sores to address possible life-threatening conditions. talk about your alcohol use, liver disease and before you reduce or stop cymbalta. dizziness or fainting may occur upon standing. ask your doctor about cymbalta. imagine you with less pain. cymbalta can help. go to cymbalta.com to learn about a free trial offer. but they haven't experienced extra strength bayer advanced aspirin. in fact, in a recent survey, 95% of people who tried it agreed that it relieved their headache fast. visit fastreliefchallenge.com today for a special trial offer.
we are in era where it sometimes seems there is no technocratic skill left. the only reason people go to congress is to be in congress and to fight with other people in congress in ways that are biologically satisfying so that people will give them more money so they can stay in congress. that this function that we see in washington should not be seen as normal. it has not always been like this. back to the 2000, congress was no prize. still dysfunctional and a lot of showboating. we got a payoff from something that they were able to do it in 2000 that was not a pointless thing. it was about apes. the chimpanzee health improvement megan's and protection act, the champ act. chimps that had been used in research, federal support for research on these guys who share 90% of our dna. nobody had taken responsibility once the research was over. they fixed that.
100 democratic co-sponsors, 41 republican co-sponsors. bill clinton signed into law, and we have a partially, federal unfunded sanctuary for chimps. because they did that today, something else was able to happen. recommendations on what america should do with the champs we have had in captivity for research purposes. we should stop research on all but 50 of the more than 350 chimpanzees that we have in labs across the country. part of the reason we should set those 300 champs 3 is that we can. we have someone they can go. we have chimp haven in louisiana, which we have thanks in part to the chip pact, doing something useful in the year 2000. the 50 that will be kept will be housed in spacious conditions in
groups of at least seven with a thousand feet of running. there will not be a high bar for what that research could potentially reveal. it has to be for a really good reason, potential for that research to be very beneficial to humans. most of them, six out of every seven that we have should be retired, free and easy. they are already getting in new chimpanzee's as they make this change. now have to focus on raising the portion of their budget that is privately race to make room for a big expansion. concerned advocacy about how responsible we are being torn these guys lead to debate and rational scientific well-informed state which led to legislation, lob, a practical, real, totally feasible policy. this is how it's supposed to go. from our vantage point,