tv Sophie Co RT March 25, 2019 6:30am-7:00am EDT
the story is you called. to tell him. not be tolerated in latin america. turn of the economic and social system could take hold and therefore the policy would be to make. the economy scream. make the economy of venezuela scream. but here's your of they hear us china trade uncertain differences persist. regime bend to washington's pressure well we asked our senior advisor at economic.
foreign ministry. the world's two leading. states in china to trade dispute and join those rising money america's influence in the pacific but with a two powerhouse economy. will the threat of bankruptcy. both slow getting further into conflict. or showdown. chandan tsawwassen air adviser on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry welcome to the show it is great to have you with us so there is an announcement that they meeting between president trump and president c. has been postponed sort of invoke the scream parallel where they had no a summit or a triumph basically walked away from a done deal is this a hint that the u.s. china tog south progressed about as much as those between washington and pyongyang . the biggest difference is that. both beijing and washington at the working level
the there has to be a very substantial and very solid discussions almost on the every detail of those deals including a lot of a controversial issues so i think that at least at the working level both sides are working even much more substantial in to reach a very substantial progress so in that regard i think that you know if there are some are still there some leave some room for the uncertainty but i think that it is a reason for the optimistic that the both sides would reach deal and finally so does having a deal agreed that trump can support mean that they american tariff center out of more terrorists and their trade war actually worked and the president has forced beijing into backing out of this stand up standoff well if i understand a question correctly i think that the from the u.s.
perspective they think that. the the biggest the incentive for both sides come to the negotiation table is the tariff and from beijing suppose specked if i think the biggest incentive for me to negotiation to come to the negotiation table is that both sides have the incentive to settle down their differences to iron out of their differences and to remove those tit for tat a tariff so that both sides kim were not suffer from even for their loss. the u.s. is demanding that china lifts its tariffs of american products at the same time to u.s. measures may remain in place tail two thousand and twenty even if the two countries clinch a deal anytime soon that's according to government sachs americans say such approach is designed to make sure china delivers on supplications under the deal says washington basically seeking to establish its oversight in china with
a right to slap terrorist whenever it wants to and will beijing agree to that well i think that this is still one of the most contentious issues and i do not know exactly what those kind of differences will be out finally but i think that from chinese perspective i think it's unfair for the because this is. the trade a negotiation and i think if i know do you want to be accepted by both sides if it can be called a creative deal so in a kind of a. unilateral actions taken by one side to to to to have the leverage to try to have the penalties on the other side i think that that may be one of the most difficult issues to be accepted by the others so what you do god i think that it will be the most contentious issues and i tend to believe that maybe we could find out a some more mutually acceptable terms that will make the in-force mint likely
they would not be decided by only by one side so washington has accused the chinese high tech john weiwei spying on behalf of beijing these accusations are pretty serious and though the company's leadership has denied all of them do you see that this issue could actually aggravate chata tensions even more. well you see i think that the most the chinese would have believed that the case of our way is very much politically motivated and it is much more to do with the fact that the united states even more increasingly concerned about a competitive edge of those high tech industry and particularly those the flagship . companies like huawei so they tried to take some pretty empty if measures to prevent huawei to be continue to have even creasing presence in large market to
shia and i think that this is what those very highly political motivated action and those so called the charges very accomplice so are you saying that the americans are basically trying to get rid of competition in this very lucrative felt well this whole affair because why away is one of the leading giants in five industry. yes definitely i think in terms of the budget investment in the past few decades always has already coupled with some other leading china's high tech communication companies they have already. been taking quite a leadership in that regard so i think that what the washington want to do is to try to to try to impede to such kind of a competitive edge by blocking the hallway or some other chinese leading companies continue to have their presence in advanced economies the united states europe or
even japan and some other countries so jim political strategists and actually even elected officials and the white house are saying that the u.s. china tensions are here to stay america wants to china's economy to conform to what washington wants and china as a rising power is bound to try and roll back you know it says influence in the world so is there any kind of a win win scenario of the chair countries relationship or is it zero sum game. well see i think that in a kind of a win win prospect of will be largely determined by the but whether both sides would accepted the fact that china to its political or economic institutions were not be changed fundamentally washington want to be so it will not be a kind of a mirror image of the united states want and you see that the when we refer to
those a market economy for instance there's no so called a a one size fits all models for the market economy and the china of course is where you believe that we have being engaged with our opening up and reform and the china's model for economic development in the past few decades has proved that it is successful and work for for china and we believe that those small those with with it's china's catalyst takes work for china so if united states try to through those kind of a negotiation or pressure try to change fundamentally and based upon china's constitution that we are china should change its political economic system it is impossible so if you know as they finally live with this reality it is likely for both sides to reach comes in each cream and well if if the united states continue to believe that through a continued press and to try to transform china to
a kind of systems which is totally unlike what the united states want that is a kind of a rush so any european and what we have right now this us channel stand of as it more about economics or geopolitics at its foundation. both i think both because i think that the front page you suppose becht if china's approach to the u.s. or china's understanding of a bilateral relationship is quite a stable in the past four decades beijing always look at the bilateral relationship is a very complex it has elements of cooperation it also contains elements of competition and even some conflicts but the. bottom line is that both sides need to find a good way to manage those differences and to prevent them from being escalated into a. head on confrontation but from the united states perspective i think that there is a growing consensus i would say the bipartisan consensus that they saying that their
so-called past decades of engagement with china. just doesn't work and they hope that they are going to. through their even much more tougher or even some people call it a new containment policy or a new cold war strategy towards china they would press china to kowtow to washington's needs that is another kind of a i think kind of a reasonable assessment of the situation so in that regard from washington post back to those competitions not only on front of economic specs they also look at china as a rising competitor or even a rivalry from a strategic perspective residence our going to take a short break right now when we're back we'll continue talking to chandan sour center advisor on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry discussing china's growing economic influence stay with us.
ruling clauses protect themselves. with the crime and merry go round of lives only the one percent. to ignore middle of the room signals. the real news is. the world. the money philosophy is dead right so the money velocity what measure of how money is being loaned out from bank to bank to bank bank bank which is a measure of economic health is dead and that the money printing continues to increase the sunset of asking the question why is the money not getting into the economy they're printing more of it. is a tense situation in venezuela is still all over the news the problem in venezuela
is not that socialism has been poorly implemented but that socialism has been faithfully implement from the inside venezuela things move different we're going to announce sanctions against the troll is to venezuela associate. famously left. the sound of the moment. it is. a moment. to whose story you called in. to tell him that he would not be tolerated in latin america. turn of the economic and social system could take hold and therefore the policy would be to make. the chilean economy scream. scream.
and we're back with chandan tsawwassen eric visor on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry talking about china as well in today's global economy some as it does sound the world bank says that china's growth will slow down to six point two in two thousand and nineteen when india is set to overtake it if the trend continues i mean does this mean that the air out of china's economic domination will be over before we got a chance to actually really begin. i think that you are right on one side economics growth rate in china has to lay down compared with the past decade by the same time as i think that if compared with some other advanced economy considering the fact that china has already be done the but to. the biggest economy
in the world the growth rate of china is still very impressive this is the first point the second point i believe that the more important thing is china's now more focus on how to improve its economic structure by shifting from what we call a. quantity of oriented. only to a mode of development to a quality. growth model so i think that in the past year in the past few years chinese government as well as the business community has a hope leave that nowadays it is more important for china to invest more on those high tech innovative industries and as well as the service industry and also to improve the consumption side of china so that to shift to china's economy from the traditionally export related one to a more a consumption relate to one and a with regard to that of india i think that india
is still in a case of also india in the face of. transformation and it also takes a long time to for indian economy to transform from those very a relatively low income towards a relatively. middle income economy with focus on those and manufacturing as well as the high tech industry so i think that the both china and india in their god i.e. it's a transitional period with that different a level of different a degree. so china is a major donor are today. the world bank but also the largest borrower for of it now the bank is to get new leadership very soon and trump stake for their position has said that chair shouldn't get any more funds from this situation if the american candidate gets to had their situation will china because of from its well. see
that this is a quite stuart debatable issues i think that. china included in some large number of what their own countries they will graduate from the so-called a low income or least developed khana me to a more middle or even. middle income status so i think this is a kind of achievements that the world economy have made in the past few decades and the world bank as well as other multilateral financials to shoes should reconsider their strategy how to shift their focus from those traditional supporting those least developed economy to more larger a number of economy which have gradually from those traditions commission know to find a low income status and how to deal with those a large number of middle income economies economic advantage demands so china has
launched its own asian infrastructure development bank it is also a member of the new development bank launched by the brics nations and both the situations are in some sense competitors for the world bank why is china silliman boring from every way it makes sense to direct those funds to the nations that are at the bottom of the list of world's largest economists not at the top. well i think that in terms of those. funding including those funding supported a family supported by the world bank i think there gradually the world bank will contribute. increasingly. the proportion of the found supporting china's development or will be smaller they in the past so in that regard i think that. china. will not think the world bank will be the biggest fund raiser for china's development but the same
time the world bank for its past decades of a. knowledge as well as expertise supporting the global development issues to stew it has an important function and the road to play for the global development strategy and its expertise and knowledge is more important that knowledge base then those found money to self so i think that in the past few years during. the presidency of world bank it has actually quite successfully transformed from world bank from the money. only money bank towards a more like a knowledgeable and so in that regard i think china's to appreciate a lot of expertise and a knowledge of those world bank. though the u.s. and north korean summit in hanoi that way mentioned earlier fails to bring any results present trump said that presence age of being was very helpful in dealing
with north korea only a year ago washington was accusing beijing of sabotaging the talks how do you explain this change of tone from washington. well i think. i think a previous. it's been quite a random it's because the beijing has for the past a few years has been. playing a very stabilizing row to try to calm down the tension over the korean peninsula and always play a very active row to try to bring all the parties including united states and north korea to come to the negotiation or dialogue table so when printer truong. two years ago and he tried to beijing of tried to stop targeted talk i think that it is a. reasonable. station now he said that the beijing has been more
help for i think that. couple of reasons one i think that maybe he tried to continue to try to you know appreciate beijing support he's a further negotiation with pain young and also he himself tried to maintain his a very good friendship with the printer she. same time i think that it's also his conviction that without beijing's support it is impossible for a for washington and the p. to reach any. agreement to which will be sustainable so trump has been saying that good things will happen to the north korean economy if it chooses to do nuclearize so let's assume for a second there appears dale has finally been great could there allow washington and track of the chinese our way through investment i mean how much of
a threat was that before china's national security well i think the. support and also appreciate. the dialogue between washington the p.r. and we believe that the dialogue on the denuclearization plus the. long piece of. long peace. negotiation of for the long piece of this area is is in the interest of all parties and china in young. united states or russia or some other countries concerned so i think that . in that regard beijing is seen sirup believe that as long as those negotiation could continue and as long as. the pin young could through those are the negotiation and also the track of denuclearization and to
continue its economic reform and opening up to a bit of good news for all parties and i think that beijing would it do its utmost to sort of to continue to support. the. opening up and the reform strategy if they me if they meet the same time i think that beijing would also try to walk very closely with both young and washington to make those negotiation a sustainable track so which means that we know those kind of negotiation would be very very complex and the long term and that these up and down is almost a. inevitable so even if there are some difficulties ahead of us i think going to beijing would continue to support both sides to be a patient to try to to try the other most to bring these two parties on the
table as beijing could. so china is investing tens of billions of dollars in africa and washington is obviously not very happy about it u.s. national security advisor john bolton says china uses bribes and shady deals for its expansion and huge loans to hold african countries captive to its demands china seeking to establish itself as a string puller in africa. well i think that china's relationship with africa has been maintained on a very sound foundation for many decades and i think that oppose the african country as a whole as well as. a china we have appreciated such kind of very good economic politico and relationship i think that nowadays the swedish about much more comprehensive include the even wider spectrum of the people to people dialogue as well as many other cooperation on those.
sustainable economic development of climate change as well as i think both sides also agree that they should china would help africa as a whole to invest more into those a sustainable security capacity beauty so in that regard i think that this relationship is based upon the quality and based upon the now going to be innovation into those domestic internal fares of each others and. in this kind of relationship is also carried out in a spirit of what we so i think that those washington's accusation. is it's a very pretty curious because if they tried to if washington tried to check those what isn't really main street thinking main street stream thinking in african continent they were found that african people in general are very supportive to those in ever growing and strengthen ties with beijing.
thank you very much for this interview you were talking to chandan tsawwassen air advisor on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry discussing their work economic relations between us and china and their potential impact on the global economy that's it for this edition of surfing and co i'll see you next. officer. told him to get up off the ground and the officer began to pet him down. and then freeze on the sounds of kind of fighting him i mean a grown man like wrestling essentially the officer who. drew his.
wish to away from the officer. of his group. the obvious or did they kind of lunge for the web in one's midst and there would have been done treece one as observations didn't hit him i never saw any contact with. any kind of went back to where they were so the answers back here they're high again fifteen feet apart at this point and that's when the officer pulled his gun and he did it on three. finally robert mueller has completed his investigation into so-called trump collusion with russia there are no additional indictments the report is finished but the follow continues.
the money lost to the is dead right so the money velocity would measure how money is being along down from bank to bank to bank bank bank which is a measure of economic health is dead and if the money printing continues to increase sunset i'm asking the question why is the money not getting into the economy they're printing more of that. number for months why don't they couldn't put them in the muslim on muslim world going to november going to a photo for us to get