Skip to main content

About your Search

20090604
20171124
STATION
DATE
2017 6
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)
, basically, state what china's concern is with deployment of the system in south korea. >> all right. i'd like -- if i can, relay that to my policy. >> i think they've expressed a concern about that ability the radar system to track any missiles that might be launched from china. and what that says or what that exposes in terms of vulnerability in their systems. so i think that's a concern. >> thank you. >> thank you, mr. chair, i yield back. >> thank you gentleman, before we moved to the classified portion, i want to touch one topic. can you explain why we're building poland and romania that do not meet the same requirements for housing sailors, as you know, i met you at the polling site, a couple of months ago, on the site which is coming out of the ground. they're being housed four to a room. on the romainian side which we just completed two to a room. by the way. it really is first class. who made this decision and why. >> sir, timeline that i understand is that former cno directed that the site be fully capable but austere in its construction in nature for housing. and the
, ma'am. >> and hasn't china also been developing ballistic missile defenses with -- >> there have been developments in that area. >> when we hear china and rash ta -- russia upsetting strategic ability, isn't that in some sense hypocritical? >> in my opinion, yes. >> when asked whether russia is using active measures to undermine u.s. nuclear modernization and missile defense efforts, the director of central intelligence stated on the record "yes, they are." i'd like to ask all of the witnesses on the record do you agree with this assessment? start with you, mr. pike. >> i do not believe i have firsthand knowledge. >> ma'am, i have not seen that or have firsthand knowledge of it. >> ma'am, me neither at this point. i can't comment. >> okay, thank you. >> i share the position of the other panel members. >> all right. in the event that the director of central intelligence is accurate in his assessment, wouldn't you be the case that this is not something that we can let stand, that we can't allow the russians to undermine our defense programs? >> absolutely. >> yes, ma'am. >> yes. >> than
. >> has into china been developing ballistic missile defenses with an intent to counter our weapons? >> development segment area. >> when we hear china and russia talk about the us of start-- upsetting strategic stability isn't that hypocritical? >> in my opinion, yes. >> a question for all the witnesses, in a may hearing at the senate intelligence committee, when asked whether russia is using active measures to undermine us nuclear modernization and missile defense efforts the director stated on the public record, yes, they are. i would like to ask all of the witnesses on the record, do you agree with this assessment? >> i don't know that i have any first-hand knowledge of that, ma'am. >> ma'am, i have not seen that first day of knowledge. >> ma'am, me neither at this point. i can't comment. >> thank you. >> i concur with the other panel members. >> in the event that director of central intelligence is accurate and correct in his assessment, wouldn't it be the case that it's not something we can let stand, that we can't allow the russians to undermine our defense program? >> absolu
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)