sanchez and we'll be recertified it was brought to the captains attention one the civility committed errors 90 in testing not awe home sharer to new practices we didn't know that the scope of this errors to date both moebz mechanics on personal leave will be reassigned and have to determine in the reviewing of the cases that the breath of this working with the city attorney's office to see if prosecution might be required next an officer involved shooting over and over on st. patrick's day at 7:00 p.m. at town hall on monday it involved a stolen vehicle the vehicle get stuck in traffic originally from the gas station the woman in control of the vehicle turned the vehicle around and came the wrong way down venice avenue after collisions with other vehicles and on the sidewalk the officers discharged their firearms were in fear that someone 0 would be injured or killed so mr. brown did not survive here jourdz yesterday we were at garfield 3w4r5urgd and obviously in the past few years have activated did garfield mission district for the officers in playground as trying to make

sanchez and live [inaudible]. i wish these pictures -- >> you can put them up on the projector. >> [inaudible] >> you can use the other mic too. >> [inaudible] >> okay. the cars were going up and down. i have been going through this for a long time and every time i see my house i go -- every time i go down the basement i get depressed because all that crap is coming up. it's not the water. it's the crap that comes up and i am tired of it, you know, and every time i call the inspectors they do -- i haven't heard from nobody. nobody has come around and said "mrs. sanchez do something" -- [inaudible] please do something about it because they haven't done anything, and even my yard i can't go in my yard because the crap is there. thank you. >> thank you. [applause] next speaker. >> hi. my name is malcolm davis. i own the building that houses stable cafe at 17th and folsom and i wanted to show a diagram here. so there's a proposal to build a park that they have talked about putting retention feemps underneath and what i understand why can't they lower the entire parking lot and make

, huh? how does that process expedite maybe you can address that an expected cu. >> diego sanchez i understand that is a much quicker process than the conditional use i want to say 3 months it is approximately more short timeframe on a consent calendar part of the agenda that is approving projects that are not extraordinary or out of line that doesn't merit discussion or review. >> so subject to less public comment. >> if an individual he believes that something should be that i would off the cds anybody can. >> and the planning director the commission president can pull it off the i've you know off the consent calendar and the business has to do the neighborhood notification healed time. >> what kind of businesses are preservation getting through an an expedited basis. >> i'm apologizing for not bringing it maybe you can help me dooerlg things like rauntz i mean it could be like veterinary place that go through conditional use. >> the restaurant are not selling hard alcohol. >> things that are generally meant to have less public lows controversial. >> you know weed we've added form

morning diego sanchez with planning department i'll present planning department recommendation currently, the planning department well, i'll go over the current controls for massage summarized it requires the conditional use for mass acknowledge but there are exemption for use massage and chair massage and employing state certified therapists didn't - police code violations and the planning code didn't currently considers a mass acknowledge establishment employing the certified therapist and medical use this generally didn't require the conditional use in any district the ordinance as drafted we've changed the controls the planning code will 0 eliminate from the conditional use authorization requirement from massage establishment and employing the cam tech certified therapist and pro bono the massage use in one year of the location if that is closed due to health code violations and lastly 9 planning code will not have a medical use for massage uses planning department supports the ordinance as drafted for the following arraigns it run states the land use and has negative effec

is the crux of the legislation i know that diego sanchez is here from the planning department but i'm trying to do with the package of legislation to turn the clock back to the 2006 levels that has caused a lot of angst among the people that have existing establishment especially, since they - we don't blame them for the dual system today, we're looking at the differentizing the massage establishment we have many, many, many establishment that are not completely tracked and no exemption filed with the city or not filed any proprieties with san francisco so we're reilly trying to bring everyone into the fold and do better improvement this legislation is by 0 no means meant to punish anyone that was caught in the dual system that came about in 2009 i wanted to do share with you a couple of the changes we met with stakeholder groups those changes are not reflected in the legislation we've committed to bringing about when it comes before the land use commission and one especially in the feinstein system we want to talk about the public service of the massage in the feinstein section we re

section with the department of public health and diego sanchez is here from the planning department here and supervisor tang will be presenting awhile we're waiting for her we'll start off with cindy. >> those are items 4 to 5 together. >> good afternoon commissioners i'm cindy work at the san francisco health department managing planning and policy and for those of you not amount with the environmental health grant we're happy new year of regulatory oversight for the natural built environment that pertains to health in the environmental health branch we have 14 regulatory programs and some of the regulatory regulations are making sure that hotels are held to a certain standard of cleanness and sanction and taxicab are aimed at the public good and regulate restaurants to make sure that people are safe and one of the other programs is the massage program in that program we also the imagine age we conjectural routine appointments to make sure the place is well ventilated and we respond to complaint and issue permits and licenses so today i'll talk about the overview why we need the ch

. >> mr. sanchez. >> want to follow up on the questions whether or not a use of this size was necessary i think someone mentions the occupancy load for this space what was the number? 75 and how many feet what is on the floor plan now? >> the calculation is 72 occupants with three staff and i would say there's been a lot of planning configurations but the number of feet in the drawing in front of you. >> i have a quick count it smells more than 70 or 80 from - >> it is also been every time configured it is about what fits in the illusion and no other person talked about meeting with the neighbors but i'll go ahead and make a motion to have another meeting if you want me to participate i'll be happy to do that's the best we have in front of us. >> i second the motion. >> is there a date and as soon as the calendar allows. >> april 23rd or the 16th we can do it i know that mr. smith will be out next week out of the office so probably look at perhaps two weeks maybe the 16th. >> i guess - >> the 23rd. >> i guess kind of a word of caution it is in the interests not to have issues

entertainment is very appropriate. >> commissioner moore. >> mr. sanchez i was interested in the suggestion of the at all effectiveness i'll strongly object i want to see it is effected by the proposed sect for a balcony for this particular deck to pull in further and stay away from the property line theirs complaints about people looking into joining yards i don't see a necessity for the decks patio whatever it is called i'd like to see together with the slaptd treatment of the roof potentially landscaping in the building rather than the patio coming dribble to the property line on both sides that allows screening for everyone including a more pleasant view from elizabeth street to the back of their homes looking at something that could be a green roof in constructing green roof i know you're familiar with the roof and maybe that will be the minimum we'll expect for this is the conflicting use i'm not saying it is but the responsibility is on the mr. president, creating the maximum

have to kick them out of their space. >> diego sanchez with staff while try to struggle with that all businesses need a land use approval so the permit for cu and whatnot if a business opened up without the permit to be in the land zoning we'll. >> how about we give them an 18 month period to fix it or find an alternative space. >> sometimes they're not permitted under the current zoning at all you can't fix it. >> they'll find american people alternative space. >> if they have a permit their grandfathered anyway correct. >> permit from who. >> from us. >> a permit from us fine but if not that's why where the difficulty lies for massage. >> i come boo back to a woman on pier street she opened up her officer on the third floor. >> we'll explore that. >> just to confirm commissioner antonini is the maker of the motion are you amenable to the finding suggested by commissioner richards. >> thank you for that. >> commissioners there is a motion and a second for approval as read into the record commissioner antonini as well sole practitioners exempt from the cu process to reconcile the arti

think either one of them can speak to that. >> diego sanchez with staff it's my understanding that the referral has a lot of information that your requesting are you in good standing once that's done they check to see if the land use allows the massage establishment. >> so they go through their hearing with dph. >> and this is for all of our permits establishment so for our permitting authority you'll come in and file out an application and look at all the information go to get a planning referral depending on the business a 3wr5urgd check and get the information and evaluate it and decide to grant or deny the permit for the business so we're the permitting authority so it starts with us and end with us and get all the other city department for example the planning department didn't grant the land use condition that they'll not been able to get a permit or a dbi violation. >> if i may to be clear they start with you with an application but the approval has to come to us before you you give them the actual permit. >> correct. >> there's a process that starts with the department of publi

appeals on sanchez and it was sort of shocking to me we'll get more details approved 6 to one it sound like the couple struggled but i want to hear more about that one. >> so about the short-term rentals that was supervisor campos ordinance that would suspend this short-term rentals program but airbnb paid they're back taxes the ordinance is are no longer necessary it is not moving forward the other two you'll hear. >> thank you. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we can move on to department matters directors announcements. >> good afternoon, commissioners just one in the amount i want to give you an update on the short-term rental activity you'll hear before the property legislation that was introduced as of yesterday there we have had almost 4 hundred applications for registration we've granted registration for one hundred and 20 and have scheduling appoints for another 6 hundred we're getting phone calls for applications for the public's benefit we're getting more efficient and our timing being able to squeeze in more applications in our timeframe to the public knows if y

raised that in response to scott sanchezs presentations so you know, i tend to g ago but the truth it ceqa a a potential district i've done 5 to 10 homes it's been subject to the same constraint and they'll say go get an environmental eir if you want to get aren't issue that's not practical so that's what was imposed on this project let me show you a little bit more first of all, that was as far as i i confirmed with alice that the concession on the third-story throughout the discussions been no third-story period? the first time we've had any concession on what is the garage connection you know what that garage connection is? that is what they say had to say in their papers with is the expansion of the garage the portion of the newly conditioned space that is within the rear yard most of it isn't it's a matter of a foot but more importantly here's what you know what we're left with i drew as and was standing there the outline of the building which you can see i'm tell you urging this layers i tried they'd all set back mandated you see and this is what we're allowed to build it is all

before. >> mr. sanchez. >> good evening scott sanchez planning department so the subject property on 2825 located within a rh1 a detached zoning district the subject lot is 67 to 75 feet with a shaped lot and 80 feet wide approximately it was constructed in 1921 open the san born map it is a different pattern of development those lots are located within an rh1 district so the district didn't have the detached the neighborhood notice was performed about a year ago last february and mark 3 discretionary review two from the vanity from the east and west on lake street and 1 from 30th avenue we had a joint discretionary review and variance hearing on the item with the planning commission only june 19th at that time the dr requesters one of the main concerns related to the third-story the removal of the they'll and looking at alternative to build they front of the property the reasons our preservation staff has received this with the vertical addition of the front building wall and found it not compatible with the historic district it is trauma this is not the main district by done the co

. sanchez. >> thank you. good evening scott sanchez planning staff with a rh3 up to 3 dwelling units under initial review of our electronic records we're report i see a appropriate printout of is an unknown so no conclusion whether permits there was one in 2004 for roofing that is unreliable and the permit which is before you to remove the illegal unit that notes the number of units as two, that said the san born records to indicate two units the building construction date in our database says 19 hundred it is unknown because probable constructed around the earthquake and those records may have been lost in under the code certainly up to 3 twnlz of it was at the maximum decency it allows for the process code requirements can be waived so information i wanted to provide for the board no open enforcement case for this property i'll be happy to answer any questions. >> photo of the kitchen it looks like it was in the 60s or 70s. >> yes. and the current zoning density allows that unit - >> we're not sure how many unit are there. >> of there were three or four under the provisions they could le

sanchez is the zoning administrator and he represents planning department and planning commission and joe duffy for the department of building inspection mr. pacheco go over others meetings guidelines and conduct the swearing in >> phones and other electronic devices are prohibited. out in the hallway. people affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes - no rebuttal. to assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or business card to the clerk. speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. the board welcomes your comments. there are customer satisfaction forms available. if you have a question about the schedule, speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow we are located at 1650 mission street, suite 304. this meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv cable channel 78. dvds are available to purchase directly from sfgovtv. thank you for your attention. we'll conduct our swear

painter will not paint a car on a saturday night i'll guarantee you that. >> sir. >> mr. sanchez. >> scott sanchez adapting the record is clear we have a non-conforming use the zoning administrator loud this to continue knowing it was a garage for any reason repairs minor in the domestic violence of the planning code and major will complied the spray booth they're seeking to legalize this is a residential zoning district the zone explicit allow for major auto repair we're denied the permit the record is clear the planning department may not have the complaints but there's a long history of compliments on the property and the brief that was submitted by itself neighbors exhibit e the fire department in 1994 stating that they were no permits for operation of that during the routine inspection the inspection was seeing that was used a second violation was issued and ordered them to stop that's an explanation why they've not been a long history of the planning department over the years there's been orders to not operate that spray booth without permits the complaint are appearing on our record

how - >> that's fine i was trying to refresh my memory. >> mr. sanchez. >> we haven't heard from the - sorry. >> thank you scott sanchez planning department the significant property is an rh2 zoning district a two family residential district the property was previously located in a c-2 commercial district in the 60 downed zoned e zoned to a residential zoning will district consequently to the rezoning in 1978 the automobile repair garage is a legal non-existing use and from 1970 it was opined about the uses that are considered here they stated to that state had been allowed to operate as a mirror repair garage from the codes and stated that those minor uses will be allowed that explicitly prohibits the major auto repair under g-22 i is the provision that allows you to have a spray booth by converting and trying to legalize the spray booth will be the eye 40 from a minor to a john automobile use this is prohibited so based on those reasons the planning department did deny the permit the permit holder states to the facility that is there now has a manufacturers of 1975 that's years aft

. business owner at the scene. >> yeah. gabbing sanchez of make ready can explain the violations it references there was an inner correct address on the permit good evening commissioner or commission gabbing make ready to try to clear up the working without a permit when the complaint was made wisp working without a permit what we've done an error in the addresses so mr. backer lives in another building but 4 buildings on the prop code so the proximity they're really really close 4 buildings fit in this chamber that's the proximity of the building but we get the violation for not working with a permit in regards to mr. brunn nos building at the time that complaint was made a prosecute permit issue for 4712 union that's were there was an address correction we explicit realize the back building had a mobile address we thought it was an alley in the back of the building so when they did the - and we corrected that violation with pulling the correct permit and showed them how they laid it out this was the same in 7 and 9 they pulled it out 7 and 9 it was an address mix up as far as the

provide light to my light well, no wall mr. sanchez made a mistake thought there was a we'll here this is an attorney provided at the last variance hearing and mr. sanchez said there's a wall this is a story board this is a permanent wall anyway so this story board a temporary wall so in addition to the cliff there is a tree canopy and the neighbors 3 levels are on top of to the right i'm living in a partial cave and here's the image so what it is the sunlight goes to way and comes down over here there's no way to block it you did the set back there's an open space 3 by 3 feet i'll get more sun that's how it streams the architect came to my house and bans the site conditions any light and even if it is insignificant light because the the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances and the light well, i have a serious noise concerns 26 hodge's has college students living there i have to go to another part 69 house they're at the property line they have 3 levels at the property line the decks and windows open up and so my neighbor has written it is too loud no way there's a competing evid

. >> okay. does e is there any public comment? >> perhaps mr. sanchez can discuss the zoning here because this - >> thank you scott sanchez planning department the subject project is within rh2 that allows the dwelling units it show the legal use but our assumes and dbi sites this is a two unit building not automatically to convert to the process to authorize that. >> i think at the time that was a discussion whether an additional in the rear or some of the things so i'm assuming that they refile to make it two units there maybe a 311 requirement. >> if they do expansion of the building envelope the section two envelope is required but restoring back to the envelope expansion that will not require notice. >> if it didn't i recommend your staff do their neighborhood meeting very well. >> certainly and the preapplication process the community meeting is only required if certain circumstances depending on the scapegoat of the status of permits they're on our website sf planning.org. >> commissioners the matter is submitted. >> a continuance. >> continued to when. >> i'll recommend a date in

sdng the boards director we have departments with cases before the board scott sanchez is

that process expedite maybe you can address that an expected cu. >> diego sanchez i understand that is a much quicker process than the conditional use i want to say 3 months it is approximately more short timeframe on a consent calendar part of the agenda that is approving projects that are not extraordinary or out of line that doesn't merit discussion or review. >> so subject to less public comment. >> if an individual he believes that something should be that i would off the cds anybody can. >> and the planning director the commission president can pull it off the i've you know off the consent calendar and the business has to do the neighborhood notification healed

. >> mr. sanchez nothing further okay commissioners the matter is yours commissioners and i'm not sure mr. sanchez wants me to talk about this this isn't the i think the there's some logic to what was discussed in the va report in that if you were to do anything on the first two lefltz that will require a variance to the rear. >> can't hear you. >> okay. >> speak into the mike please. yes. >> the - the point i was trying to make is that the first two floors since the building pretty much goes to the rear property line any type of work within that will require a variance question is whether this small enclosure of the stair as a variance should be addressed in the is that you as the previous comments recommended to additional envelope that would be gave through a variance i don't find that way in this case, i find that the question of the variance is probably addresses is well addressed in the 5 criteria therefore i'm support the variance the question of the cut out that the appellant is asking for i'm not sure what it will do for her it doesn't make the light or impact sunlight an

come around and said "mrs. sanchez do something" -- [inaudible] please do something about it because they haven't done anything, and even my yard i can't go in my yard because the crap is there. thank you. >> thank you. [applause] next speaker. >> hi. my name is malcolm davis. i own the building that houses stable cafe at 17th and folsom and i wanted to show a diagram here. so there's a proposal to build a park that they have talked about putting retention feemps underneath and what i understand why can't they lower the entire parking lot and make it a very simple -- even if only needed to be for the 15 years it's going to take to do the big project if they could make a big depressed area there that's not covered. of course it costs a lot of money to cover it. couldn't we pick a bunch of parking lots and lower the level? i have driven down to the buildings during rainstorms at three in the morning and the parking lot is safe and dry and my building is under water. i am wondering about the calculations of the cost of these things and incredibly high cost for something it becomes undoa

sanchez and live [inaudible]. i wish these pictures -- >> you can put them up on the projector. >> [inaudible] >> you can use the other mic too. >> [inaudible] >> okay. the cars were going up and down. i have been going through this for a long time and every time i see my house i go -- every time i go down the basement i get depressed because all that crap is coming up. it's not the water. it's the crap that comes up and i am tired of it, you know, and every time i call the inspectors they do -- i haven't heard from

. >> good afternoon. i am victoria sanchez and live [inaudible]. i wish these pictures -- >> you can put them up on the projector. >> [inaudible] >> you can use the other mic too. >> [inaudible] >> okay. the cars were going up and down. i have been going through this for a long time and every time i see my house i go -- every time i go down the basement i get depressed because all that crap is coming up. it's not the water. it's the crap that comes up and i am tired of it, you know, and every time i call the inspectors they do -- i haven't heard from nobody. nobody has come around and said "mrs. sanchez do something" -- [inaudible] please do something about it because they haven't done anything, and even my yard i can't go in my yard because the crap is

of mr. sanchez planning about the regional growth of the technician communities so we need to be thinking about this in a regional way when we talking about so say no to the equality the reason i wear this hat we live undertaking in a democracy and need to come up with the mission forward is have opportunity brown before us in terms of the balboa park restore how to figure out the best use to create affordable housing and have a group like sf burr ac k a bark for 6 thousand unit and the other side the neighborhood that is pushing back against anything happening tulsa at all i'm in the middle ground trying to find 6 thousand units is too much impact we need more analysis but zero is not the answer either so you know where is this happy medium and create the workforce that will house the teachers and civil servant and students in streamline schools and the african-american community we have the certificates of preference how is it we create a great strategy for using the land supervisor tang is talking about developing others old site another 46th and n judah but not a talk about t

process is that covered under this. >> commissioners diego sanchez right now that is approved only those projects that have submitted a site permit if they've not done that the new process will be employed and that make sense increase a lot of things in the pipeline. >> connor to add i referenced in my comments a section 8 that will deal with one way or another what i've talked about in the portion of 162 i believe the distinction of the development permit excludes the conditional use applicant so if not gone nor a building permit application we want to make sure that who in the current pipeline. >> those are current large authorization or cu one other thing you might want to think about maybe it's too lastly for the cafe but consider doing it for the final occupancy i see people moving into the development next to the cafe they won't be innovative under the process a determineable amount of enjoys the noise is too much and put - do the developer put in it is required to does - >> it's talking about the xhchgz and innovativeing the residents first is the amendments and additions to

coordinator staff profiles i'll briefing thank diego sanchez and aaron star and i believe ann mare so thank you for lending our staff they were very helpful from day one the result of all u you'll those meetings and conversations with the stakeholders is the legislation you say before you i'll briefing walk you though the legislation first most important element is that the entertainment commission and the planning department will create and occur rat pa map of the existing permanent places of entertainment about 3 hundred and 50 when a developer summits or starts the application for residential development within 3 hundred feet of one of the places of entertainment the planning department novices the developer and the entertainment commission there's a potential conflict between the new development and the existing venue the entertainment commission will then van to have a hearing with the developer and the venue will be invited and present their plans on how to co-exist the developer can present sound issues and the neighboring venue to mitigate the conflicts the traefkts will do