from the american center for law and justice says that reports show exactly the opposite. >> "abc news" reported yesterday that in fact their source, everybody's at the sources. i'm supposed to be talked about nothing, but everybody is sourcing and leaking. their source says that the determination had not been made. to investigate the present. so, again, you have "washington post" their source. abc has their post and meanwhile, we have not been notified of a investigation. bill and daniel alluded to this at the top that his legal team told fox news that he was not acknowledging, that he was under investigation when he sent out that tweet last week knocking the attorney general deputy. his other news of the lighthouses we, jared kushner is going to make another push to get the middle east peace project going on wednesday. he is headed to the middle east. he is going to israeli officials in jerusalem and palestinian officials. jared kushner may also be scouting for new personal attorney to represent him in the russia investigation. his current attorney who was a colleague of robert muell

do? fake news. and responded to another mr. trump also tweeted, what about cbs, nbc, abc, and "the new york times" and "washington post"? they're all fake news. president obama took little action after learning about russian meddling. the network reported before james comey testified that he would contradict the president by saying he never told mr. mr. trump he wasn't under investigation and the russia probe. in fact, he said just the opposite. cnn to its credit was quick to retract both stories. cnn imposed stricter standards by telling its staff at no story related to russia controversy can be published and of the approval of two top editors. >> heather: thank you so much. >> jon: the senate health care bill draws near, the g.o.p. is hoping to hold a vote by the end of the week. and u.s. allies backing up the president's warning to bashar al-assad, stay away from chemical weapons or else. >> it's absolutely right to prevent the use of chemical weapons and we will fully support. with shrimp crusted with kettle chips. or new, over-the-top lobster and shrimp overboard. but it can't

jonathan carl from abc piling on jay carney. that was a valuable moment. i think the on camera briefing is important. >> jon: guy benson, emily, i'm sorry, we have to run. emily shire from muscle.com. thank you both. >> heather: president trump slamming democrats for opposing the senate health care plan. why he says that the resistance of the g.o.p. bill could actually backfire bed plus the top u.s. military official arriving in afghanistan today with the trump administration and what they plan to do to strengthen afghan forces as a defense secretary admits that things are not going well there right now. >> we are not swimming in afghanistan right now. and we will correct this as soon as possible. >> jon: chairman of the joint chief of staff, joseph dunford are arriving today in afghanistan. at the u.s. gets ready to send nearly 4000 more troops to the country. part of the trump administration strategy to strengthen the afghan forces. jennifer griffin is live at the pentagon with the latest. >> this is the second high-level senior u.s. military efforts to visit afghanistan in t

lawyers said on television recently. >> representatives are saying that he got his information on abc's this week this past sunday in which he said this in response to a question as to whether or not the president would seek to fire robert mueller. watch here. >> i can't imagine that that issue is going to arise, but again, that's an issue that the president with his advisors were discussed at there was a basis. >> he never said that the president was considering firing mueller. as the white house points out in the trump legal team points out, he is not a member of the trump legal team, he is not an attorney for the president and he is not in a position to know whether or not the president was thinking about firing mueller. this whole thing seems to be almost the very definition of fake news in that one person saw another person talking on tv and misinterpreted what that person said, then went on tv and seven he thought that person said. now everybody is trying to beat this thing back. the president will be heading to wisconsin for a workplace development week event. there is some 6 mil

your name and if i point to you. >> mary bruce from abc. >> hello mariy. >> i hope you clear it up once and for all. does the president believe climate change is real. >> it is interesting through all of the discussions is focused on one single issue. is paris good or not for this country. that's the focus. and the focus remained on whether paris put us at an disadvantage and it put us an economic disadvantage. you may not know this. paris is targeted 28 percent. and entire agenda of the previous administration we fell 40 percent short of the target. it was a failed deal to begin with and even if all targets are met by the nations in the globe it was reducing temperature 2- 10ths of one degrees. that's what the president focused on. and whether there are good environmental objectives achieved as a result of paris, his decision was no. >>s yes, or no. s yes, ma'am? [inaudible] the mitt scientist say that trump badly misunderstood the findings of that report and that in fact [inaudible] so specifically what are the science. >> there are other studies that are published at the time an

that? >> cnn and abc went pretty hard with the notion that when comey testifies he never said such a thing about telling the president he was never under investigation. he was kind of picking on reporters there. he did single out that "new york times" story. a spokesman for the times told me they reviewed the coverage and stands by the story and would be happy to hear any details from comey are the fbi. that undermines his criticism, he did not say what part of the story was wrong. >> melissa: we know is reporters that if you report something and you are the first to break it and you have unnamed sources, the punishment for getting that wrong is the idea that when you are proven wrong, you will lose credibility and you are embarrassed. i wonder in this cycle when there is so much flying by all the time, do you really pay a price with back when you run a story and it's not true? >> sometimes you do. this hearing is a perfect example, a good chunk of this hearing was james comey talking about the press but that was not the focus of the coverage at al all. every network outside of espn