," congratulations mr. speaker. i've a a hard time understanding something. maybe i'm just a simple guy. if i was under subpoena to hand over emails that end up having classified top secret special access program information on a secret server, if i deleted 33,000 of them and some of them were in that category -- i think it would be in trouble. they subpoenaed my blackberry and iphone's and i smash them with a hammer, a lot of them? i think i would be in trouble. if i acid washed my computer with police, i think i would be in trouble. if i gave away 20% of america's uranium, and $145 million came back to me, i think i would be in trouble. compare this to the debbie wasserman schultz. >> the wasserman schultz case is so crazy. again, if you want to understand why president trump gets frustrated, you look at donald trump, jr., who released all his his emails and put them out and says everybody can read the emails. no subpoena, no legal requirement. then you look at wasserman schultz's behavior and hillary clinton's behavior and you have to say to yourself, well, how come the news media is

frustrated and as we bring in newt gingrich, the former speaker of the house, mr. speaker, what she on to say was, look, this president never sends mixed messages. so i read that as he is sending not a mixed message but a clear mechanical to the attorney general. do you think he's saying you need to go? >> well, no, i think what he's saying is exactly what his message says. you have the clinton foundation, you have the swap for the uranium with the russians, you have millions of dollars coming out of a secret canadian foundation that was funded by the russians. bill clinton getting a half million-dollar speech in moscow. i think what he's saying is why isn't there a parallel investigation? and i think frankly that if sessions who was not recused on that issue were to announce what did happen, you would see a little bit of a relaxation. this whole thing is totally one sided and basically a witch hunt. you did that a little bit yesterday. there were people suggesting that a clerical error, which is fixed within 12 hours was somehow comparable to the nixon 19-minute tape erasing. i mea

and the author of understanding trump. mr. speaker, add neil gorsuch and you have five. he handled the originalist. i argue if those things aren't done there's a possibility 2018 could be a shock election for the country and not good for the republicans. >> i think that's right. i think the left clearly is going to turn out. the left hates trump. they'll do anything they can to beat him and the question is one, can we have enough energy and drive among our base that they turn out. and two, can we perform well enough that independents decide they want to re-elect us. it comes down in a sense to your list and to a deeper sense of do we represent prosperity, economic growth, higher take-home pay or not? president trump was talking about what he wants to do to make america great again. i think he's in the right general direction. i personally believe they'll do as much as they can on health care right now but shouldn't spend the rest of the year on one issue. they also have to pass, i think, by thanksgiving and get signed into law by thanksgiving, a very large tax cut retroactively designe

understanding trump, mr. speaker, those are the -- add neil gorsuch and have you five. the president handled the originalist. i would argue those four things are not done. that there is a very strong possibility 2018 could be a shock election for the country. novelty good for the republicans. >> i think that's right. i think that the left clearly is going to turn out the left hates trump. they will do anything they can to beat him. the question is, one, can we have enough energy and drive among other base that they turn out and, two, can we perform well enough that independents decide that they want to reelect us? i think this comes down in a sense to your list but also to a deeper sense of do we represent prosperity, economic growth, higher take home pay, more jobs or not? trump, you just said the president a minute ago talking about what he wants to do to make america great again. i think he is in the right general direction. i personally believe that they ought to do as much as they can on healthcare right now. they shouldn't spend the whole rest of this year on one issue. they have also

" bestseller -- newt gingrich. mr. speaker, good to see you. >> it's good to be with you. before we go on other things, i want to tell you.. callista and i watched last night with fascination. we thought don jr. did a great job. i happened to be with his dad this afternoon in the oval office. as we chatted, he said he's very proud of don. he thought it was a really great interview. he watched it carefully. i think it was a really, really important show. one that gave somebody without any editing -- when the country is looking right there. talking straight on. they got a way to measure his sincerity, his honesty, his openness. if you had to do it over again, he even said, he probably wouldn't have handled it the same way. i want to congratulate you. i thought it was a very, very important show. >> sean: it was 20 minutes of his life. in retrospect, he would have done it different. let's take the ukrainian situation is one example.e okay, give a dnc paid operative sharing information with the dnc and hillary clinton, meeting in the ukrainian embassy. they are disseminating information on then can

have mr. schumer eating humble pie. >> neil: chairman, have you heard from speaker ryan about keeping the house open in august? >> we haven't heard directly. i broached it with the speaker a number of times. congress works better with deadlines. things get done at the very end of temperature 11th hour. with this, what we need to do is do self-imposed deadlines. let's get healthcare out of the way. i believe that if we set in place before we leave in august the parameters of reducing corporate taxes down to 15 or 16%, look at repatriation -- >> neil: you met at reducing taxes. you probably heard one of the plans the senate is calling for is keeping the taxes on the upper income and the .9 sur tax for the upper next for medicare in place. what do you think of that? >> i've heard that. i also know that there's no other plan to go with that proposal. that's a political decision. not a policy -- >> neil: if something like that came back to the house, how would you feel about that? >> we've been firm. we believe the taxes need to be repealed. obviously as we look at that -- >> neil:

in a way. ainsley: here to react from that the only rational speaker and the pit bull of development mr. larry. good to see you, larry. >> it's irtational. that's true. steve: and we just irritated him. so what do you think about the snowflakes saying stop calling snowflakes? >> then quit being snowflakes. really, the problem with believing that you're special is that you will believe you deserve special treatment just because you're special. and yet, the world is always going to judge you based on contribution. your mom and dad will think your special, but that's it. the rest of us want you to do something to contribute something. brian: and you're hurting these kids, the next generation if you tell them they're special without earning that because they're about to go into a world that's not going to treat them that way. >> yeah. once they walk out their front door, it starts when they're little kids. you're special. and then they walk out the door, and they're just one more snot nose kid sitting in the third row of their 1st grade class. and from that point on, it's always going to

it is an honor to be with you. >> translator: i'm delighted to be able to meet you personally mr. president and i hope as you have said our meeting will yield positive results. chris: speaker gingrich, how much should we make of what the two men said about russia meddling, now you have got president trump in a tweet this morning saying i'm going to move forward? syria, north korea, all the issues. are we overstating the importance of this meeting? >> well, i think we will know in six or eight weeks. i mean, if they actually have a cease-fire that actually works, which also by the way involves israel and jordan, that's the first time in the syrian civil war that you will have actually had a joint american russian agreement that survived. but i would say that you will know more about that in six to eight weeks. if they create a relationship where they can get a genuine cease-fire in eastern ukraine that is an enormous step in the right direction. if they can create a relationship where the russians understand that we would defend the three baltic states, and that they cannot threat

times" best-selling book, "understanding trump." mr. speaker, what is the significance of french president trying to get near our president. >> macron has gone out of way to invite president trump to paris for biggest annual holiday, bastille day. trump agreed to come. this would surprise americans. macron is very business oriented technocrat. he came out of nowhere. he built his own legislative party, won massive election for the assembly. he is probably strongest president of france in modern times. i think he admirers trump. plus i think he wants to balance off angela merkel, the chancellor of germany. no french president wants to be in shadow of a german chancellor. if he can be balanced between trump and merkel he max mices his own leverage. very smart man, well worth watching. steve: maybe he was supposed to be far screen left. we don't know for sure. he was out of position in the beginning. >> he is like trump. you say to him stand like there. he walks off does what he wants to. i don't think he is easily managed. ainsley: he will be meeting with vladmir putin today. i don

impeached. impeach 45! impeach 45! >> i rise today, mr. speaker, to call for the impeachment of the president of the united states of america for obstruction of justice. >> are we getting closer and closer to the possibility of yet another impeachment process? >> after watching the clinton impeachment, i thought i wouldsi never see another one. >> we are well on our way to impeachment, because i think there is a clear set of facts that show obstruction of justice. >> i think that donald trump has already done a number of things which are legitimately raised the question impeachment. >> jeanine: now, former congressman dennis kucinich is standing up to his fellow democrats and blasting their latest plan to remove president trump from office. joining me now to explain more is former ohio congressman andex fox news contributor, dennis kucinich. good evening, congressman. you know, you are taking a rather strong stand against many members of your party who want to impeach this president. why? >> first of all, this is about our country. the american people made a decision in november and