amendment by ms. gabbard for emergency response for non contiguous states and 147 by ms. chaney, amending the hypersonics initiative language to include inf treaty impacts. >> gentle lady yield back? >> yes. >> gentleman from long island wish to be recognized? >> just to echo the words of the chair that she and i have worked out these amendments in consultation with the subcommittee and the staff and i support the package and i yield back. >> is there further discussion on the onblock package? and let me yield to myself for just a moment to make a point. if you look at the underlying marks, there are a little more than 100 requests for reports. if you look at all the amendments submitted, there's another 100 requests for reports. i've ask dod how much the average cost of a report is and they can't report back an answer in a timely way. i picked one that was on my desk that i requested last year. it's 15 pages, and it costs, according to the little notice on the front of it, it costs $26,000. if all those reports that i just mentioned in the amendments and the underlying c

ms. spear votes aye. mr. hunter, mr. vesey votes aye. mr. kaufman . miss gabbard, mr. kaufman votes aye. miss gabbard votes -- ms. hartzler votes no. mr. o'rourke votes aye. mr. scott votes no. mr. no crust votes aye. mr. brooks votes now. mr. gallego votes aye. mr. cook votes no. mr. moulton votes aye. dr. winthrop votes no. miss hannah brousseau votes aye. mr. byrne votes no. miss shea porter votes aye. mr. graves votes no. miss rosen votes aye. miss stefano votes no. mr. mcgeechan votes aye. miss mc sally votes no. mr. carbajal votes aye. mr. knight votes no. mr. brown votes aye. mr. russell votes no. mrs. murphy votes aye. dr. digitally votes no. mr. cano votes aye. dr. abraham votes no. mr. o herman votes aye. mr. kelly votes no. mr. swazi votes aye. mr. gallagher votes no. mr. panetta votes aye. mr. gates votes no. mr. bacon votes no. mr. banks votes no. miss cheney votes no. mr. ice votes no. mr. mitchell votes no. mr. jones, mr. rogers votes no. mr. hunter votes no. miss gabbard -- okay. >> how has mr. kaufman recorded? >> mr. kaufman votes aye. no? okay. >> co

amendment number 3 by ms. gabbard from hawaii, amendment number 4 by mr. aguilar of california. amendment number 5 by mr. garamendi of california. the chair will reduce to two minutes the time for he will thoke -- for any electronic vote on this series. the unfinished business is the request for a recorded vote on amendment number 2 printed in house report 115-68 by the gentleman from minnesota, mr. -- 115-698 by the gentleman from minnesota, mr. nolan. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 2 printed in house report 115-698 offered by mr. nolan of minnesota. the chair: a recorded vote has been requested. those in support of the request for a recorded vote will rise and be counted. a sufficient number having arisen, a recorded vote is ordered. this vote and all further amendment votes will be two-minute votes. members will now record their votes by electronic device. this is a two-minute vote. members are reminded to stay on the floor for further votes. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the un

ms. gabbard: thank you. this time i'd like to yield one minute to my colleague from california, congressman ka in a. -- kana. the chair: the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. khana: this will stop the march of war tpwh iran, another blunder like iraq. i don't understand our foreign policy. it seems the qualification in john bolton's case is to be wrong for the last 25 years and that makes you an expert. wrong about iraq. wrong about the neoconservative philosophy that got us into this mess. this amendment, forget the details, we are rushing again to another historic blunder and this congress needs to stop that. i respect representative gabard for putting this forward so we don't make another blunder in our foreign policy. yield back my time. the chair: the gentlewoman's time has expired. the gentlewoman from north carolina new york. >> i rise to claim time in opposition. the chair: the gentlewoman is recognized for five minutes. >> i oppose the amendment to strike section 1225 which is an important

ms. spear votes aye. mr. hunter, mr. vesey votes aye. mr. kaufman . miss gabbard, mr. kaufman votes aye. miss gabbard votes -- ms. hartzler votes no. mr. o'rourke votes aye. mr. scott votes no. mr. no crust votes aye. mr. brooks votes now. mr. gallego votes aye. mr. cook votes no. mr. moulton votes aye. dr. winthrop votes no. miss hannah brousseau votes aye. mr. byrne votes no. miss shea porter votes aye. mr. graves votes no. miss rosen votes aye. miss stefano votes no. mr. mcgeechan votes aye. miss mc sally votes no. mr. carbajal votes aye. mr. knight votes no. mr. brown votes aye. mr. russell votes no. mrs. murphy votes aye. dr. digitally votes no. mr. cano votes aye. dr. abraham votes no. mr. o herman votes aye. mr. kelly votes no. mr. swazi votes aye. mr. gallagher votes no. mr. panetta votes aye. mr. gates votes no. mr. bacon votes no. mr. banks votes no. miss cheney votes no. mr. ice votes no. mr. mitchell votes no. mr. jones, mr. rogers votes no. mr. hunter votes no. miss gabbard -- okay. >> how has mr. kaufman recorded? >> mr. kaufman votes aye. no? okay. >> co

number 20 r1 by ms. gabbard to require dod reporting on acquisition and processing agreements of the 180 days. amendment number 35 by mr. whitman concerning wittman concerning the use of lowest priced accepted contracting procedures when acquiring complex systems for installations on ships. over 71 by mr. larson to exempt certain contracts on the periodic inflation adjustments to the acquisition related dollar threshold. number 73 r1 by mr. cook to prove it the acquisition of sensitive materials from not align for nation. number of 120-2011 by miss davis davis to require report on the defense acquisition universities ability to adequately train the department of defense acquisition workforce. number of 129 r1 by mr. smith regarding additional requirements for negotiations for noncommercial computer software. is there any further discussion on en bloc package number one? if not the question is on the amendments in en bloc package number one. in favor say aye. those opposed say no. in the opinion of the ch