jay wallace. all joking aside, i do want to extend my appreciation to the port bath, we meet regularly, they are tireless in their advocacy of the ports interest. they let me yell and scream from time to time. we all work well as a great team. you have some tremendous port staff, it is your to work with and i'm just excited to finally be here with the dates ahead of us after many years. ricky, rebecca, mike, elaine, grace park, who is not here, all of them do a great job. thank you very much. i'm happy to answer any questions. >> that is the end. that is it area any public comment on this item. oh there is a lot of public comment on this item? don't feel compelled to eat. we know that they have a lot of support. we know what a wonderful process this is area if you really want to speak, come on up. does everyone want to seek, or does anyone not want to seek -- week -- -- speak. >> i'm on the board of the barbary coast neighborhood association, we are the immediate neighbors of the project. they hav

jay, valerie. >> i am karla. i am a member of the board of pacific heights residents association. phra fully supported 3333 california street. iit is a fantastic project. i am a neighbor. i have lived here since 1990. ir walk, bus or drive around the property many times every week. my two youngest children just graduated from college. both of them have moved to utah to afford housing. in all of these capacities i am happy to support this project for the following reasons. it adds thoughtfully planned housing, housing the city needs and needs in this neighborhood. at a mixed range of afford built. proto is responsive to neighborhood concerns. it offers greenery and adds commercial space on california street. it is a wonderful chance to incorporate this into the fabric of the neighborhood instead of buildings entirely separated by a wall. we will have north, south, east, west access through the property reintegrating with the existing grid system. i strongly encourage your support of this project. thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> i am will, long-time resident of the neighborho

. >> my name is jay and i own a business at 1010 stockton street. i support chinatown station only. if using a person's name, travelers won't know what it is. it will be a loss to our business. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi. i have a video. >> my name's amy chan. i am for naming chinatown station only. >> i was not aware someone putting up a sign supporting rose pak outside of my store. i support chinatown only. i do not support rose pak station. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker >> good afternoon, board of supervisors. thank you so much. i stand here to represent my daughter -- >> and what is your name? >> cassie bahr. we just came here from china because my husband was persecuted in china for eight years. my daughter asked me, why is rose pak name on the station? i love chinatown, i love china, but they use rose pak name on the station. this is america. our teacher told us america is free country. what is difference? is it right? so please, please help us help the children. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> greetings, board members. my na

opposition to the project from neighbors voicing concerns over the fourth floor on light and privacy to add jay sent buildings and out of context to the the neighborhood and concerns of the conversion of three unit structure and effects of neighboring foundation. i believe there was one additional. staff recommends approval of the conditional use authorization request as noted in executive summary. it does involve demolition of the structure, proposed will provide two family sized units. it is not historic resource. this is a point of clarification. the unit is not occupied it is vacant. no known evidence of eviction: it is consistent with rh two zones. that is concluding my presentation. the sponsor is here with a quick presentation. >> good evening, president melgar and members of the commission. i am going to edit this on the fly so bear with me. the reason we are asking for demolition is because the existing driveway goes up 4 feet 9 inches from the street. any attempt to modify the building to add fourth floor. the existing building is seen from the street yesterday. here is a closeup of t

secondly, moving on to the ho jay tenant improvement c.o.p., the office of public finance expects not to exceed amount of $2 million in c.o.p. based on the estimated cost for the 62 million c.o.p., the office of public finance estimates the maximum annual debt service will be approximately $4.7 million per year for a term of 20 years. a little bit of background on the c.o.p., as a general fund supported form of debt, the c.o.p. will be repaid by annual base rental payments appropriated in the city's general fund. it will structure the c.o.p. as a lease buying between the city and a third party trustee. it is anticipated the city owned laguna honda campus located at 375 laguna honda boulevard will service -- serve as collateral to secure the c.o.p. for more background, the campus sick -- currently secures the existing c.o.p. data that was issued in 2009 and 2012. with the approval of these ordinances, the board will also approve related financing documents in their final and substantial form, including the supplements to the project and property leases, trust agreement , notices of sal

in the words of that great philosopher jay-z -- you wonder why they call it the projects? because it is a project. but we are changing with hope s.f. these are communities that demand the respect, that demand for us to pay attention to them and make sure that that isolation that has existed changes. so this is not just about the housing that is going up; it is also about the grocery stores that we fight for to come to this community. it's also about making sure that the streets and the roads look like other areas here in san francisco. it is about the joint partnership with bains and nibby, and bains being the biggest black contractor that we have working on projects here in san francisco. it's about all of those pieces working together to create a vibrant community for the people who have been made so many promises for years. as someone who has lived in public housing, and who had opportunities and mentorship and people helping me be able to grow, so we can come back and work together to realize the things we've talked about for decades. and that is the vibrancy of hope s

. >> i am jay. for the purposes of today i am a board member and resident of richmond. i am familiar with this location. i go by it quite a bit. i am speaking in support of the 744 proposed homes and specifically in support of the plan. i hope you will approve them as is. i want to share a couple quotations from a book that i have been reading recently. the review process is highly political. the people with the greatest steak in the outcome -- stake in the outcome plan play no part i. we don't know who they are. they may be people coming from elsewhere. also, hearings like this they demonstrate there is no local constituency for the people who will live there. people talked about considering the people already there. i agree. that is an important consideration. we need to consider the people who will be there in the future. i came to san francisco six years ago. this is the place that called to me. it is a place i knew i wanted to live and be my best self and fully live. i didn't know about the housing challenges other than offhand jokes. there were reasons to be here.

department that they will have to sell their space needs elsewhere and we can't, as part of the ho jay exit, absorbed that cost. so they moved into the building without my knowledge or permission, and we are working with them to try to resolve that situation, but it is not anticipated that real estate or this committee would be asked to solve so how is it that we move into the hall of justice without your knowledge or permission? >> just to fact check, i heard this number yesterday also. if i could just read the information that we provided about what has been going on. it was january of 2019. we increased by 16 to extend the hours of healthy street services to 11:00 p.m. the total number was 43. as of september 2019, the total number assigned was reduced to 40. they stated that they do want to vacate the hall of justice and understand the need to do so and did not validate this number. >> i think people who have personnel on that building know there are 80 people. i have heard this, not just from one source. i just want to say, could you please fact check that? and the idea that they