marco rubio as somebody like rand paul who is out there talking to younger voters and latino voters. that does not mean that republicans do not have work to do. >> hillary will be 69, will it be a factor? >> it will be an issue. she will have to answer questions about health and make it clear to the voters that she has the capability and energy and focus and drive to serve. she has already had a very successful career, but a long career. you have to answer the question about if you are fatigued or if you have given everything. >> she is clearly somebody with enormous energy. it is not what you say, but what you do. if she runs with a lot of energy and passion, i do not think there is a question. >> the republicans have a special committee looking at benghazi. could that hurt her? >> i do not think so. i think he is trying to mollify the party which is obsessed with benghazi. where the voters are it is a tragedy and they want to know how we prevent something like this again and we should stay on the case to hold people accountable. they know these tragedies happen in the world. it ha

republicans who believe in a robust u.s. presence abroad like marco rubio to make the case. why the u.s. has to stay involved. why reversing course would be a disaster. >> is there a case to be made? >> prior republicans have a ruined foreign policy for years to come. people remember george bush and dick cheney. the wars that have accomplished little and lost many men and women and a lot of treasure. the public sees it for what it is. you still have hawks and neocons urging obama to do so much more around the world. they don't have to face the consequences of new military adventures. >> is there a fault line where you think america should intervene militarily? put boots on the ground? >> i think it has always been a question of when american national interests are at stake. in those cases, it should always be an option. >> i would say what john mccain and others are urging, we should not do. not more in ukraine. tough sanctions is the best way to go. syria was handled clumsily, but do we want to go to another country which we can't control, replacing a horrible dictator with a democracy? >>

politicians. $59,000 to john boehner. $27,000 to marco rubio. $25,000 to harry reid. the real power is byzantine. comcast is also the chairman of the national communications association. gave millions of dollars in lobbying last year. he's going to the same politicians that comcast contributed to. the top five lobbyists and all of washington dc. chairman was the president of the fcc. for anyone at the fcc was wondering about their next job, one person is now the ceo. a commissioner who helped approve the deal, she left the fcc to go work for comcast as their chief lobbyist. she is one of 107 lobbyists trying to use comcast's power and influence to encourage washington to accept this you'll stop >> that revolving door continues. we mentioned that meredith baker left the fcc to go to comcast. andshe's leaving comcast going to lobby for the wireless industry. >> it does sound a little like "house of cards." >> they all work together and they are all thinking of their next employer. >> there is money changing hands. >> it is worth knowing who the players are. committeese judiciary approved

, disbelievers. recently, one of the leading contenders for the republican putnation 2016 marco rubio himself firmly into the disbelievers camp. what does that mean for you and your efforts? depoliticize this issue. but as i said before, we don't have to get people to cry uncle, it is happening. we just have to have people understand that if they see any risk of this happening, that the price is so catastrophic that it is time to buy insurance. but i would love to have a shot at talking senator rubio and all of the contenders -- >> have you had any -- or seen any effectiveness on that front? have you approached some of the folks who are still resistant to even entertaining the idea, and what have they said? have you entertained any of your -- >> i think more republicans are now talking about clean energy. and you will see a change in the republican party over the next couple of years. and the reason is this -- when ageoll americans under the of 30, 85% of them want controls on carbon pollution. so if the republican party or the democratic party or any party wants to have a future, they have t

primary. he backed marco rubio's opponent and is a big supporter of karl rove. he is not a tea party supporter. >> i don't think he supports rand paul. whole libertarian wing is a little isolation is so it's hard to know whether he is being pragmatic and wants a winner and therefore is avoiding more of the extremes of the party or if he just wants a strong candidate to support the military which would tends not to be the tea party which is focused on cutting costs. >> is he effective as a donor? >> yeah, i think so. when you look at getting the as candidates to las vegas to the republican jewish coalition meeting to talk about the importance of the u.s. relationship with israel, that's an issue that is clearly is focusedut it because of sheldon and others who care deeply about the issue. no question it is an important issue but the degree of attention paid to it is a function of the fact that sheldon adelson is a massive donor to your campaign. havinge is no doubt that him back in you is going to be a big plus. how do you see him compared to the koch brothers or other republican dono