on developing an income stream which the the capital improvements needed to preserve the infrastructure and but they're required to maintain height he limits, etc. but in the search for private dollars they're often looking for a variance to the waterfront land use plan the recent projects involve some kind of variance plan so we're requesting the port or recommendation is that the port review and rise the land use plan, which was created 17 years ago. and include a maritime aspect because it focuses on preliminary land and development and the maritime aspect of the court is very, very important. we feel there should be a lot of pun input on the revision there was a revision announced august 11th we received a copy today between august 11th and december 30th too the time period closes is 7 weeks we feel that's an example how it's not city to do public entity on this and finalized on october 13th it should include maritime aspects of how to develop the maritime activities of the port which is examples are great cargo and fishing and x urgsz a a great deal of of other things private birthing and reject finding six the 2007 it is estimated that that will be b at thirty percent capacity and one of the preliminary reasons is fell statute dating back to th

process of doing is review of our water land use plan we had that if mind when the jury investigated the port with the warriors project off the property we were able to free up staff time to put this report together and as was mentioned in on that ground it was released publicly i don't know mr. him you were there we're going to move our comment time to november with our intensifies to do the outreach this is a land use review it goes bag to inacceptance the waterfront land use was adapted in 1997 looking at what was accomplished and not accomplished and why within the water land use review the port staff has indicated areas we are, improve we've had good responsiveness for people looking at the water land use review and we're excited to go further with that >> in terms of what the port staff thinks about updating the water land use plan a lot of areas the plan has moved forward in the ferry building sub area we note there's a couple of area we need better planning with the neighborhood but also our colleagues at the bay conservation and you land use commission and the planning depar

take more time to digest our land use plan to think about two things about the overall planner in terms of the development needs of city and what we expect overtime this is a longer-term issue than the next 5 years but as the commissioners in 1914 thorough out about the short time decisions this is an appropriate time for the excision to rethink what we should be thinking here in the land use plan we're not going to disciplinarian this short-term but it is upon us to think about the future this is a huge turning point and i've heard we need to think about this how it's integrating in terms of our process in 5 years we probably need to pay attention to this we referenced it is noted in the plan but it's not really i think totally not that we have all the solutions but to think how that is going to effect us in terms of the structures it really is something we need to think about now and to alert the existing uses of the waterfront what they have to be thinking about as we think about the new developments we have to that about sea level rise but a lot of planning that needs to go on

supervisor cohen for doing that amendment i came into the land use committee prepared to vote for the legislation there should be notice of parking removal ahead of time it's a matter of practice we will of want to make sure while we're combrairs our film city we're respecting our neighborhoods so to vote for it after the feasibility language is removed i voted against the measure i thought it didn't have been flexibility finding there's time when 72 hours notice don't work for legitimate reasons it's important to put that in context that the film industry matters a lot in san francisco it matters because of its national and integral portrayal of our city it's very, very beneficial to san francisco in matters because it allows us to have the aspect of the arts world especially the smaller independent films to having a happy in san francisco in addition it creates jobs and especially blue-collar jobs and jobs that don't necessarily require on advanced engineering degree so it's something we should be combrairgz the large productions can embrace all those in san francisco. >> my read of

that went to land use on july 28th and then to the board of supervisors and passed unanimously it will come with a second reading on september 2nd it's not entirely done and supervisor breed will be introducing minor amendments i can discuss but i'll keep this relatively short i think this effort started out as a measure to make things easier for small businesses i am hoping the san francisco small business commission will be an ally. there was a small business 3w5i789 of frequenting gal in the european hate in district 5 that bumped into the plodding they're a shirt screening print shop and ran into both the police code they contacted the entertainment commission that afforded that and we looked at into the police code and frankly find quite a bit of it no longer relevant and expensive for businesses. i'll mentioned a few things back in the 82 there was concern our arcadia were corrupting the youth and the board of supervisors at the time this is in 1982 wrote extensive regulations dealing with or a cascade games it was 6 thousand words dlailt when and where our arcades can be in san

intent of the legislation there is details at the land use committee that effected the arresting cascades that was approved and we amended that with concerns under the entertainment commission i can go into detail but we pa made a distinction between bars and non-bars the idea that the entertainment commission times to be engaged with bars and work with them on a good neighbor policy and it's different than some businesses so we want to make the distinction so that the entertainment commission can maintain it's off-site with bars that's what happened that determines the minimum number of games before a bar needs a permit from the san francisco entertainment commission i can go into that but that essentially is the high-level overview and by way of context the entertainment commission was kind enough to put together a list of the or david's cascades it's a relatively small amount 11 locations that have a one devices and it's a popular universe and i want to finish by showing the stack of letters in the upper hate. the entertainment commission staff said it was one of the most posi

recommendation and it was sent from the land use committee so their looking forward to a response on the state level ab 2128 it passed both houses this month it will compel it is signed by the governor at the end of this month to inspect now solar and that concludes my update. >> commissioner walker. >> yes. regarding the what do we call it not the airbnb but the short time rentals i believe we're going to be talking about that in our joint meeting with the planning department correct? >> i think. >> no. >> i don't think it's an agenda item. >> so we're going to when are we going to agree on the agenda item. >> this week. >> can i let you can about the i'm trying to catch up i know there was communication to madam secretary. >> relating to code enforcement but not short term rentals. >> i really building that this is san francisco historic preservation commission we should be talking about commission to commission because it don't effect our department so i'm hopeful we, make that happen or at least agree that we talk about it. >> if i can interject while i was watching the haergs th

operations and the ship repair industries reside and are embraced in the water front land use plan and that said, we are looking at what are the changes that are taking place, up land in the eastern neighborhoods, and the bay view hunter's point and trying to create new opportunities, that are consistent with advancing the maritime industrial but also provide new job opportunities, recreational, and open space, opportunities as well, through, advancing the blue, green, way in the southern water front, through the hern's head and the creek improvements and through the cove park projects that are now under way and we have quite a litany of the open space opportunities that are planned. and we have also, been looking at where water recreational access can also be expanded because this is part of the water front that does not have a constructed sea wall and so it offers new opportunities, for that kind of recreation as well. and so, there has been a lot of work with the southern water front advisory committee and the maritime commerce to come up with a strategy for taking on more maritime improvement including freight rail improvements th

land use plan was announced and developed, from 1990, to 1997, and it was a very robust, process, and with 46 members, who were appointed by the port and by the board of supervisor and by the mayor and specific community groups that were involved. and we have not seen that kind of robust out reach at this time, as you are all are working on an update of the port report. and in fact, the timing of the update, is that it was released in august, and after our report was issued, and but the first deadline for the public comment at the end of september, and i think that now, to november, but as those of you who have been active in the city's political life knows, the period from the middle of august to the end of september is not a very active time. for many people that the board of supervisors, and the community groups that are also, not very active during that period of time. and even, when the distinction to the end of november, and that is during the election season and the people who are politically active, whether it is the residential builders association and the chamber of commerce or political clubs or the neighborhood groups,

the land use is considered a preferred location by the wireless guidelines. this would be composed of three primarily elements on the rooftop. first three panel antennas would be placed in the front end of the building or screened by replacement ter pit and three additional antennas located in vent pipes and three antennas near the rear of the building and screened intended to mimic wood lattice screening. additional electronic equipment in the ground floor area underneath the stairs. the community was presented with the information and on ppositions on project over concern of radio wave emissions. the facility would comply with the fcc standards. thank you. that concludes my presentation. >> thank you. project sponsor. >> good afternoon commissioners, director of houma uman -- fares for at & t. the krup will allow at & t to place up to nine antennas on the roof and downstairs in a storage area. approval of this cup will enable the commission two omni outdated antennas on balboa strt. at & t has worked with staff and the community to develop an appropriate and least intrusive means

wanted to state their case hours before the land use committee discussed the issue. air b and b is urging local officials to move forward with legislation that would legal it's home sharing in san francisco. >> so many of us use the spare room income to pay for bills, and not just utilities and tuition, but also for mortgages and rent as well. >> depending on the outcome of today's land use committee meeting, the issue could move on to the city's board of supervisors for further discussion. >>> an endangered warm water turtle somehow ended up here in the ocean near the golden gate bridge. these are pictures of the rare pacific green turtle. a group of fishermen hoping to snag salmon hooked the turtle. they were able to remove the hook and release the turtle back into the ocean. experts say it's extremely rare to find a green turtle this far north. the water here is chilly. young man, go south. most green turtles live off the mexico coast. >>> this bear went south. it's so warm there he took a dip in somebody's pool in the community of sierra madre. this is the person's backyard. he swam i

water front plan as though it is all land use but as we were acutely aware, while the original water front plan was called the water front land use plan, it is about the maritime as well as the land use, and i think that it is important that people refocus on the role of maritime and we made several suggestions including what is deal with be the cruise ship lines and we understand that the port's position, and that efforts to do something with the cruise ship lines and opening it to up the foreign vessels, and it did not suck seize when it was brought up before which was in 1998. but it is a long time ago. and a lot has happened since then including an american flag vessels and so really is comes down to a question of either little, and it was a pilot program and something along that nature. the american flag vessels of which there are actually done. and so, i would that this calls for a stronger effort, by the port, and rather than just, be part of a coalition, and that had spans the whole coast including what the people who are competitors. we also, and in the place that were takin

commissioner adams here is your stock portfolio and this is a break down of the port's land uses by type, and you will see that over 40 percent is either in current maritime use or plans for the maritime use or 25 percent is planned for parks, and you know, about 25 percent of the port is leased up on a fairly long term basis. and we are still refining these numbers but they add up to ten percent of the port's portfolio and this is an analysis that we conducted after commissioner woo ho asked us to look, how much is left to look to develop at the port and there is not that much, and it is on operating the port and improving our portfolio. and there was the comment about public input and we take that to heart. and and it sets fourth the process planning and the development planning that leads to you know, over 400 meetings, and in the pier 48 there was strong community involvement and developing that plan, and the ideas in that plan came from the community. >> it is really the city's water front and we have to have that from all of the districts in the city and i want to clarify what the port issued with the water front plan, review. it is a look back to see what has been accomplished

and we offered to expend the deadline for public comment on the waterfront land use program until october twoktd we proposed the end of this month there's a huge outpouring of the land use review we think it's appropriate to the november 30th timeline we'll be meeting with as many groups as possible in the next thirty days. >> we've been receiving a lot of interest and feedback. >> yes. a lot of feedback people are making their way through the documents we've not seen many comments there are a presentation diane and others will be making a presentation this monday night to isolate the comments our committee advisory committee and reaching out as far and wide as we, the copies of the document have been broad and we've gotten a lot of just positive comments on the right ability and the pictures people really enjoy seeing the before and after. now the sad part >> before you get it that part. >> could i also comment on the run and swim that so many port staff participated in this weekend. >> okay yesterday excuse me. sunday there was a giant held the giants race this runs the range of the waffling it extend if from 5 e

affordable housing we'll you'll be hearing from us the planning commission reject all the conditions until the plan is met we ask the planning commission look at the land use outlining the plan specifically thegles outlining for people nonprofit for future development. as the property project for van ness is congregate another long string of larger condominium we ask you to reject this project >> hi, i'm tommy i'm with plaza 16 coalition i want to talk about to built our way of this housing crisis ted egan says it will take one hundred though maushth units to be make a noticeable dent? housing prices unquote not to bring them down to middle-class to afford them minimal our dwindling water supply if we brought in that many people and it didn't solve the problem but amazing made a small dent a grand jury report the mayor's office of housing under pressure and challenged to preserve different quotas while the housing market is enjoying it's investment one should not september the ownership crisis? city to decreasing even if the mayors 25shg9 of thirty thousand new units by 2024 is met the report suggests the best way to make the housing affordable have the te

been the co-chair of the jland use committee for japan town and serving on the land use committee and one of the projects that i have been working on are the design guidelines that will be enacted turned js and will soon be before you and as we were shaping up this project one of the things that i realized personally, was that this building, really presented a wonderful opportunity, to test what we are trying to do through js. and because there are very few building spaces available in japan town, and so, anything that goes up, and i want to stress, that this was being planned before there was really anything in place that was mandatory. and when things are not mandatory, people are not always really well or willing to just leap out there and say, oh, yeah, i am willing to take on a little extra work and a little extra, possibly restriction in what i have to do. but, little friends, and hkit architects said, that would be great because we are part of japan town, we want to advance what is going on here and we want to be sure that we are compatible, and we believe in our community. and

amendment that was made at land use, and we met with executive director kane and the city attorney and supervisor breed right before the august recess after that board meeting and came up with what i think is a compromise that will benefit all sides so let me walk through how that evolved. the original legislation said a bar could have one game but as soon as it gets two games it needs a permit from the entertainment commission. nan bars can have up to 10 games before they get a permit and that's not changed and they're off the table and there is strong consensus that they can have 10 games before they need a permit but as it was submitted a bar can have one game but if it has two it needs a permit. supervisor kim which is on the land use didn't like that and too much of a hassle to small business owners and made an amendment that a bar could have up to four games without a permit. as soon as they got the fifth they needed a permit. that passed in committee with supervisor breed's support. although she is not on the committee. i spoke on her behalf and went to the board and passed unan

. >> same housing call this motion is approved item 29 >> item 29 considered by the land-use economic development director meeting on monday, september 22. this item was forwarded to the board as committee reports it's an ordinance amending the planning code. what was elementary and secondary school and childcare uses that exceed $25,000 [inaudible] to authorize a nighttime entertainment use in the western [inaudible] up zoning district within 200 feet of any property within residential enclave or residential enclave mixed district where nighttime entertainment use legally operating within 5 years prior to an application to reestablish the use and allow nighttime entertainment as a permitted use within the western [inaudible] were mixed-use district >> supervisor can >> thank you president to. colleagues i ask for your support on this cleanup legislation for western summit plan which we passed last march. by 2013. it was a plan that gone through seven-year process. it is a very detailed and complex plan allowing multiple types of uses whether pdr, office rowing residential, and of cou

report but it is a substantial one. the land use committee heard thinks short-term rental ordinance. you heard this on august 7th. at that time you recommended approval with 16 maemdz amendments to be made to the ordinance. these were delivered to the board and as a land use land department exercised a goal to create a legal avenue for this use and thanked the supervisor for taking on this challenging issue. at the same time the director addressed the need to focus on three key changes . first ensuring the system is not abused by creating real limits by the number of days a unit can be rented. second, a dedicated budget for staff and third, establishing limits for hosted units. after opening remarks from the supervisors, there were about seven 7 hours of public comment. and a representative from one of the hosting platforms came to the hear and addressed the board. this is what one commission suggested at your hearing. as part of the board hearing there were several recommendations and amendments. eight amendments that a person on the registry can only have one permanent residence a

the direct result that the navy has the land and taking mediation at the sites. so this is the land use pattern for the project you have the yellow and orange for the residential again 10 thousand 5 hundred unit the blue showing commercial in the hunters point shipyard site and red is retail that's i'll get into that that's centered around the existing stumd site and open space you'll see a lot of the parks and open space is located within the large pink area i've identified he hunters point shipyard this is under the navy's control all the parks is down at candle stick. so the revised phasing plan includes the c p center we'll call sub phases o-3 and 04 those are included in the projects next phase of development and all of c p center the next sub phases are within the stadium site together it includes 6 hundred and 75 thousand of retail and up to 3 hundred and 94 affordable housing and the local serving hotels and c p center is one of the primary anchors of the candle stick point portion of the project. those diaphragms illustrate a lot of what i've said on the left you see there are a number

they called a deal to finally end a stand off one that would create a committee for future land use by cal. >> he promised this will be a land use committee, all committee members which will all abide in the future uc land development. >> the university agreed to an overall an over all oversight of the entire university and the land use. so that's huge. >> reporter: not true say university officials. >> that predated this protest. that would continue and that committee would stand regardless of how the protest ended. in short there was no quick proquo. >> reporter: by 12:30, all of the tree sitters were down, handcuffed and placed in patrol cars. the men will likely face contempt of court. >> today's effort was brilliant both in its design and execution. >> i think each one of us are going to internally see what could have been done better. what could have come out of this. we also have to take the time to say we did a hell of a job. >>> in all, four were sentenced to community service. was one given jail time for credit for time served. all five were also ordered to pay the university's attorney fees ranging from 5,000 to $10,000. the university said the protest ended up costing $700,000 in con

really important to think in terms of land use in a variety of ways in looking at the city's waterfront hoifl so some areas will have housing and job producing space and so on it's important we keep in mind. the other comment the 6 hundred and 43 acres of open space that's not emphasized enough in terms of we feel ballads the waterfront is still to come for the greenway and there's a sense of waterfront industries and as well as overseas the amount of public access to the waterfront is subsequential and it's something we should not forget we're here to oifbl provide that public assess and it's greater than a lot of cities where thank you visit the developments it sit up against each other we have to remind all our stakeholders in the state that's a very badly and i guess the other point in addition to this major challenge with the sea level rise is the fact we obviously have capital infrastructure needs to maintain the port as is with no new development so our challenge to figure out how to keep the waterfront as is and regardless of the new plots to finance the new development with dif

the land use commission today, i'm happy to support it today. >> thank you. >> on the motion by supervisor cohen to make those amendments as described to item two madam clerk call roll. >> supervisor cohen supervisor kim supervisor wiener. >> no. >> you have two i's and one no. >> so the amendment is adapted supervisor cohen i want to make a motion on item 2. >> yes. i would like to make a motion on item 2 a motion to adapt the amendments. >> the amendments have been adapted. >> motion to move it out of committee and motion to move it to the full board with a positive recommendation i will not been able to support that motion fwiven the striking of the words when feasible i support this in general but as i mentioned before this is to me i think it's good that supervisor cohen that i put that in there and i hope it will come back with that, i'll not been able to vote for the motion i hope over the next 8 days there are continued conversation with a workable solution the film industry is important in the city and make sure that is being conducted in a way that works for our neighb