briefing. he briefing. he was also asked about hillary clinton's e-mails. >> something quick at the top and then we will get your questions. over the course of the day today, today, a continuation of activity that has taken place across the week the pres. and his team have worked hard to amplify the middle class economics team theme that was raised throughout the president's state of the union address. it stands in stark contrast to the priorities we have seen from public and from capitol hill, from republican senators getting together and writing letters to the leaders of the islamic republic of iran for trying to play politics and funding for the department of homeland security or engaging in an effort to convince governors across the country to not cooperate with our efforts to fight climate change. the pres. is president is focused on effort to expand opportunities for the middle class. that strategy has yielded benefits. we saw that in the latest jobs report that over the course of the last 12 months our economy has created more than 200,000 jobs in each month. the 1st time we have

terms -- anybody wants to see the report you can get it through the clinton foundation. they also have an interactive database that you can access country by country. but you can see how the society as a whole is improved when conditions for women improve. and i think that everybody's winners. and one of the things that if when data like this exists it convinces more people that they should, in fact increase standards. and more men get involved the better. so we're all for that. and i do think that we are areas because we have m plil controversy or made partisan really things that are no brainers that -- such as health care or trying to reduce maternal mortality. there are so many things we can agree on, ending violence against women. you have to have more involvement in men. you should not politicize these things. it took us too long to reauthorize the violence against women act here in this country. we know that to have legislation like this helps fight violence against women. and everybody wins. so i'm hoping that we can through hard core data and knowing more about these issue

clinton responsible for devising on resource allocation. while you are the state were you also responsible for enforcing the department's policies regarding the use of personal e-mail accounts and record retention and if not who was responsible? >> congressmen i was in the states during during that period and responsible for a vast array of responsibilities in terms of managing the department. >> were you responsible for the enforcement policy regarding e-mail's? >> that were called having any conversations that i remember. >> said lewis was lockable? >> i would have would refer to the state department. >> you would achieve operation office so the policy was not your responsibility? >> clearly the functions that did it in a straight of at the state department reported on the line. i didn't spend a great deal of my time. >> were you responsible are not? >> i take responsibility for the operations reported to me. >> were personal e-mail accounts part of your responsibility? >> personal e-mail accounts are not part of the state department. >> were you responsible for enforcement o

republican nomination to prepare -- prepare for the 2016 election the wisdom is clear that hillary clinton will be the democratic nominee. but i will say hillary after her husband were one year ahead of me and law school. i have been burdened with them 20 years longer than the rest of the country. [laughter] [applause] i feel i have a civic obligation to help escort them to the exit door of american politics. [cheers and applause] so in short, i am ready for hillary. she will run on the basis of her record as secretary of state. as hard as that is to believe. i will say clearly her for years that the state department demonstrates that she is not said to be president of united states. [cheers and applause] and if it is not hillary the alternatives are hardly better. joe biden? john kerry? elizabeth warren? here is the key point on national-security issues hillary's record is indistinguishable from barack obama's. let's consider the evidence on international terrorism terrorism, and she supported obama withdrawal of american forces from iraq in 2011 the single most significant decision in to

think hilary clinton broke the law? >> i am going to do my best to answer. secretary clinton's team said at the request of the state department, they have reviewed her records -- >> i know what the team has said. but does the whitehouse believe hilary clinton broke the law our complied with the law? does the president believe his former secretary of state broke the law or complied with the law. >> you will have to go verify this but if in fact what secretary clinton's team said they were going to do and that can be verified by the state department that would be consistent with what the federal act requires. i was not in a position to review secretary clinton's personal e-mail. that was the responsibility of secretary clinton and her team. and they said they turned over thousands of pages and e-mails, including many on the state department system and that is entirely consistent with the requirement of the federal records act. >> let me ask you about something said in june of 2011. jay carney your predecessor, said all of our work is conducted on work e-mail accounts. we are instructe

everything that it takes to get to the truth even if that goes to hillary clinton's private server. my congresswoman, my friend, susan brooks. [applause] rep. brooks: they are all leaving me. thank you. good morning everyone. great to be here. i was just going to turn to my right and left, and think the feller hoosier -- the fellow hoosier, tom wheeler. and i wanted to thank randy your chair, and kim read, for hosting me this morning. i do have a quick announcement. just because of what has happened. the executive committee has asked me to make an announcement. i know how important those are. they just wanted to me to make sure you know attendance may be taken this afternoon if you are not present because you are watching march madness. don't worry, i'm kidding. if you're going to be watching the hoosiers like i might be watching them at the airport, we hope to see it at indianapolis at the final four for anyone joining us there. i do want to congratulate all of you for being a part of the 30th year, 30th anniversary as an organization, and to thank all of you for your efforts to e

in kiev as our ambassador, had a lot of opportunities to observe president clinton's behavior towards his neighbors -- president putin's behavior towards his neighbors. you largely referred to his intentions, but would you expect , for example, if unchecked, russian forces to move into mar iupol? >> mr. putin cannot accept a frozen conflict. a frozen conflict is a bad outcome. with a frozen conflict, ukraine could develop as a stable, democratic state. that is what mr. putin is against. he has to move beyond the area he controls. mariupol is the most likely target, but not the only one. the russians have been conducting a terror campaign in the second most important city in the whole country, but they've been unable to establish a clear presence there. they will probe there. they will move wherever they can with the least casualties to themselves and the least uproar in europe. we need to provide ukraine the means to stop that from happening. otherwise, he will continue to go forward. >> with me ask you to answer two questions that are often poised in a contrary view to mine, that pro

journal, the discussion of hillary clinton's use of personal e-mail and how the controversy could affect the 2016 presidential race. and ken walsh on his new book about celebrity culture and how it has shaped politics. washington journal live each morning on c-span. clicks -- >> you would see a stickball set. washington was a large man over six feet tall, very robust and a natural athlete. madison was a skinny little guy. rex this -- >> the sunday, talking about font -- founding fathers. clicks his gift -- >> his gift is his ability to form remarkable partnerships with great people of his era but it also alludes to his gift to the country of his talents and what he was able to do to help create the first self-sustaining constitutional republic. >> sunday night at 8:00 eastern. >> john wunderlich of the sunlight foundation is next talking about current archiving and hillary clinton's use of personal e-mail. >> "washington journal" continues. host: and we are back with john wunderlich to talk about regulations for the agencies for personnel who have personal e-mail accounts. let's just beg

has held several high-level positions in the clinton and administration and is also the author of several books on international relations. to my left, dov zakheim, a long-time friend and also the vice president of the center of national interest -- vice chairman. he is also the comptroller at the pentagon during the george w. bush administration and is the author of a quite provocative memoir about his years at the pentagon, called, "vulcan's tale." dealing with how he believed the administration mismanaged in afghanistan. and today, we will talk about iran, it could hardly be more timely. the middle east is always in ferment. today, a defense department official weas quoted in the wall street journal asking, "who is going to be the person who shoots the archduke of the middle east, igniting a new world war one." with negotiations in geneva and the events in yemen, i think it is hardly a better time to discuss the role that the middle east and iran are playing in american politics. i will go to david first. david rothkopf: thank you, it is a pleasure to be here. i think it has be

future is on the left. i think really? hillary clinton joe biden, nancy pelosi harry reid. that's the party. republicans i think have the interesting thoughtful aggressive young leaders of the lots more to talk about with bill kristol. first a call from karl also south carolina. independent. >> caller: how are you guys doing? mr. kristol, boy i tell you i have seen you on tv for years and years and years but i've got to give you credit and i've got to give the republican party could that's what i'm independent because you guys whatever you all fight for believe in you all stand up and fight for it. but i did see last week on tv and i noticed it was clear the. when you guys said the guys on the bus was on using the n-word because that's something they learn from rappers and stuff but i don't know why everybody wants to think that that blacks created that word. i mean we use that word but we got it from the original people. >> host: follow up on that story out of oklahoma aspect that was a back and forth discussion on "morning joe." i didn't mean to pretend that that word was invented b

: it all depends on which issue. overall, i gave president clinton and b plus and president obama a b plus. president george bush, a c minus. the only reason i gave a c minus is because he had a failing grade of f and one categories. that failing category was katrina. anytime you have people die, people. people who felt disenfranchised and felt their country did not stand up for them or was there for them, that receives a failing grade. we are still feeling the affects of katrina, 10 years after katrina. specifically for the new orleans community. president clinton received a b plus. yes, there were things he could have done more. there were things he did nbc did not do. as obama is interesting. i changed his grade while i was in the process. you see a big difference between first-term black obama and second term. specifically, second term fourth quarter. he had to navigate the waters strategically. anything to target african-americans, would have been viewed, by some groups, in a negative light. you cannot discount the fact that there are deserve what it should -- there are dispropor

the clinton administration that it would be free from the regulation. >> that was the chairman of the confirmation hearing i do want to ask you because you commented on this order to negatively impact the providers and they had been proponents of these regulations but you raised some concerns how they would be impacted. >> the lines between the provider are blurring over time and so you may have multiple parts of your business and that is problematic as you try to figure out how to comply with the rules and more importantly i believe the commission will continue to push its regulations up the chain and as of today when we talk about that under the new definition and then we are now having a debate on how we have the structure to deal with the middle mile we are bleeding red into the backbone of the internet and that only leads us to the providers over time. >> i appreciate your answers and yield back my time. >> now that i know the rules required we could go five or six more rounds. >> i'm sure they would love to stay around longer. [laughter] i want to thank the witnesses i know that

you satisfied with hillary clinton's response yesterday that she or her attorneys personally went through her cash of e-mails and determined which ones were personal and which ones are government and turned that question over to the state department? do you think there is a public interest in having an independent person figure out whether proper e-mails were scooped out? martin j. o'malley: i respect your interest in this issue, and i did not watch the press conference yesterday. i will leave that to you to figure out, i do not know. i did not watch it, because i was working. [laughter] bill galston: that seems like an excellent note. in my experience, the people at the back get shortchanged, so i will start back there. >> i am a fellow with the department of housing. you spoke about having real-time statistics in fighting crime. did your administration also measure community policing police training, and building trust with citizens and communities? martin j. o'malley: thank you. in 1999, our whole campaign was about community policing comstat, we had a robust conversation about

affected by what others do? for instant secretary clinton is she gets in the race independent of what she does or says if she goes to wall street and comes out very strong against wall street, for instance, if a senator war or somebody likes -- somebody like that got in would that affect your decision to get in or get out? >> i would not be running, you know, people in vermont understand this. a little carefully than other people. if you're looking at someone who is run in many many elections. in the house for 16 years the elections. in the senate twice, lost some elections. do you know how many negative ads i run during all those years? not one. never read a negative ad. i don't run against people it's not my desire to trash people. hillary clinton is a remarkable person with an extraordinary history a public service. it would not be my job to run against her. it would be my job if she ran and if iran to debate this years issues facing our country as intelligent people should be doing in a democracy. [applause] and let me say this. again, this is how i always do myself in trouble. i'm ge

getting some good advice from hillary clinton, leon panetta, bob gates, they were pretty good at imposing tough sanctions on iran. they were squeezing iran. they were gaining benefit from iran from those sanctions. they were getting themselves in a position to negotiate a good deal. but what's happened since then? not only have those people left, but i have talked to people inside the negotiating process who will say they reach an impasse and then there are more people more senior come into the conversation and they say things like, well, how do we solve this problem and they capitulate and they soften the deal. i spoke to a former senior national security official democrat, who said to me just two days ago, at this point in the negotiation, from the school of negotiation in which i was raised, i would be ordering everybody down into the lobby with their luggage and saying we're leaving because only in showing that you don't need the deal do you actually have the leverage you need to achieve the deal that you want. and that right now our body language, and the iranians know it an

that's why i had my heart attack. >> you also covered the first lady hillary clinton and then what would hillary be like to cover as a candidate. >> she's very different from her husband. people really need to recognize that. she is a trail blarzer. but she's not president clinton. we're gouge to have to see how she-and-a-half gats the waterers. one thing we're going to have to figure out is how to handle president clinton. here you have a man who was president. and when he goes to the white house, hey, he might be the next ambassador, something. he is capable. so, you ne, what do you do with a former president and a man who's still globally known. >> well you have another interview and so you'll kind of squeeze us in. we promised to get you out of here on time. before we let you go you're an officer in the white house correspondence association. if you could have anybody as an entertainer for the white house correspondence association dinner, who would it be? >> there are two people. one person was chris rock. i asked his wife. i thought he would be hot. i'm putting it out there, chris

time for the impeachment of president clinton and the subsequent trial for:that we will never probably see another story quite like that. if you have the pleasure of reading his memoir that is called kidnapped pie -- which is a true story and available on amazon, you may have heard this story of one of the greatest scams ever pulled the the history of broadcast journal was of -- journalism he convinced his bosses in the work that he should cover the very beginning of the new millennium january 1, 2000 in the very first time zone. because it is right next to the last time zone at the end of the day he could cover both the beginning and the end of the new millennium. so he convinced us he should be sent to tonga. [laughter] he found a location and outdoor location were the case would lead the people at the stroke of midnight and he reported live then there were no direct flights across the international dateline to use of allied but there was a goal for a charter then he flew to the other side and covered the last time zone to celebrate. it only cost maybe $30,000 may be. [laugh

what others do? secretary clinton, if she gets in the race and depending on what she does or says, if she goes to wall street and comes out very strong against wall street, or if senator warren or somebody like that got in, with that affect your decision to get in or get out? senator sanders: i do politics. people in vermont understand this. you are looking at somebody who has run in many elections. in the house for 16 years, eight elections. in the senate twice. do you know how many negative ads i have run during those years? not one. i never ran a negative ad. so i don't run against people. it's not my desire to trash people. hillary clinton is a remarkable woman with an extraordinary history of public service. it would not be my job to run against them. it would be my job, if she ran and if i ran, to debate the serious issues facing our country as intelligent people should be doing in a democracy. this is how i always get myself in trouble and i am getting my wife nervous already. we can't have that serious debate if the media doesn't allow it. so i would urge my media friends,

himself from hillary clinton, in a debate, when he said the approach ought to be engagement, the questioner he faced said well with whom would you engage? and his first reaction was iran. and in fact hillary clinton responded to that with some skepticism. i do not believe that our interaction with iran over the course of the ensuing six-plus years is therefore somehow an accident. if you look at the chaos that followed in the wake of the arab spring and the changes that have come in the middle east, one country has benefited. that's iran. iran has benefited with greater influence in yemen. it's benefited with greater influence in iraq, by a very considerable amount. it's benefited by greater influence in syria with its man assad looking now likely to outlast obama in office. it clearly looks to benefit from the upcoming nuclear deal in some important ways. both in terms of sanctions relief and in terms of increased stature. at the same time -- the only country with which there has been a substantial improvement or potential for improvement or thaw in our relations in the past six

c-span #comments. like us on facebook, follow us on twitter. crocs hillary clinton spoke with reporters for the first time tuesday about her use of a private e-mail account while serving as secretary of state. here is a look. there are 4 -- secretary clinton: i opted for convenience to use my personal account which was allowed by the state department because i thought it would be easier to carry one device for my e-mails instead of two. looking back, it would have been that her if i simply used a second account and carried a second phone that at the time this did not seem like an issue. second the vast majority of my e-mails went to government employees at their government addresses which means they were captured and preserved immediately on the system at the state department. third, after i left office the state department and ask former secretary of state for our assistance in providing copies of work-related e-mails from personal accounts. i responded right away and provided all of my e-mails that could possibly be work-related, which totaled roughly 55 thousand printed pag

was instructed and it was governor clinton had this goal and the economy was in tough shape, too. he drove this idea through tough times when people said we can't afford it and elements in history, chapters in history repeatedly remind us that we are replete with these bits of evidence that tell us that when things were tough when the economy was really really weak we pulled ourselves out of those pits, those financial downfalls and did it through investment in infrastructure. and here we not only have the opportunity to pull us up and have a stronger economic response, but it's always enabling us to utilize the intellectual capacity that grows innovation and ideas and lighter -weight materials all the greater. the bang of the buck is all the stronger. there are elements to lower that to that effective bit of planning that can take us through the tough economic times and respond to the crumbling infrastructure and build the new state of the art elements into our nation, be it communication utility, transportation-wise or water or sewer-wise. there are golden opportunities to add

over $18 trillion. when president clinton left office in the year 2000, our debt was $5.6 trillion, and today it is over $18 trillion in debt and we continue nine more years of waste, fraud, and abuse in afghanistan. we in congress owe the american people a debate. with that, mr. speaker, before closing i will ask god to please bless our men and women in uniform. god please bless the families a child who died for freedom in afghanistan and iraq. i will ask god to please bless the president and the house and the senate that we will do what is right in the eyes of god for god's people today and god's people tomorrow. and with that, mr. speaker, i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the chair recognizes the gentleman from north carolina, mr. holding, for five minutes. mr. holding: thank you, mr. speaker. i rise today in honor the ted fowler, who recently retired from a storied career from one of north carolina's and indeed one of america's famous dining establishments, golden corral. an inspirational leader, he reti

be home to the clintons again. now, here's where the democrats don't want you to admit. it's not just conservatives at cpac are tired of the obama-clinton agenda. polls show that over 70% of the country want the next president to take a different direction than barack obama. that's bad news for hillary clinton because i can guarantee you, america, you're not going to get something different than obama with a member of the obama administration. you're going to get a third term of barack obama. i don't think our country will accept that. i don't think our constitution can handle that. and i don't think our kids can afford that. the good news for us is republicans have a great field of candidates that are running for president, and i'd much rather have that than what the democrats have. they've got one candidate ready to core nate herself and they have a constituenting vice president who can't control his mouth or its -- his hands who's been running for president since before i could vote. republican voters are going to have a real choice. that means real debates about new ideas, an

by hillary clinton. what's the journal is live at 7:00 a.m. eastern time on c-span. you can join the conversation with your phone calls and comments on facebook and twitter. secret service director joseph clancy testifies before a house appropriations subcommittee tuesday. it follows a string of security lapses at the white house and the recent report of agents driving drunk and running into a white house barricade. you can see it on tenet -- at 10:00 eastern time on c-span3. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] this weekend, the c-span city tour. inside the museum is remains of a confederate ironclad, the css jackson. those oval shapes are the gun ports of the jackson. it was armed with six rifles. . i think there is a real appetite out there. all of us share the frustration with getting in our car and trying to get from point a to point b they taped video from buzz feed to present enrollment to obamacare. from the university of chicago's institute of politics, this is one hour in 10

of women in 2015. and later gawker's john cook talks about access to hillary clinton's personal e-mail accounts. "washington journal host: it's friday, march 13. we have more political coverage later today on c-span. welcome to "washington journal." you are reading about the stories online. this is how you can join the conversation. if you are a democrat you can call% (202) 737-0001. four republicans

in 2007 senator clinton introduced, with the cosponsorships of senator obama and senator kerry, the oversight of iraq agreements act which stated that any status of forces agreement between the united states and iraq that was not a treaty approved by two-thirds of the senate or authorized by legislation would not have the force of law, and prohibited funding to implement that. for the record because i just don't have time to give you at this moment i'd like you to explain whether under the standards of the obama administration the introduction of that act by those three senators constituted an interference with policy undermining president bush's policies ate. i want to focus on a particular question. there is a question here. i fear you have misled this committee in telling us that once iran has the rights of a nonnuclear state, subject to additional protocol, that you'll be able to stop sneak outbecause you said first, can't develop a nuclear weapon because that would be illegal. that a preposterous argument. obviously they're willing to break the law. the next point is you have c

else. we do dealings with saudi arabia. the worst slavery state of the world. clinton peoples head off doing everything else everybody is doing. americans just in the 60's -- 1960's were burning people alive. what are we stand together as a country and stop talking about each other? the rest of the world agree are prophetic. host: ok, sue. can you take the first part of it? are we at war? doing it to declare war? guest: the fight over war powers is one that is never going to be resolved. it is the sort of age-old tussle about what the constitution means and what it says here people who wrote it are to live. we go back and forth. after vietnam, there was a big shift in the direction of congressional oversight. that was when the willpower's act was actually passed. i am not a lawyer, i'm just a former hill staffer, so that can range my perspective to it. i think we are the middle -- where the middle ground is here is that everyone wants government to be on board. the white house wants the backup from congress so that if something goes wrong he can turn around and say you are in with

positions in the clinton administration, also the author of several books on international relations. and to my left dov zakheim a long-time friend and also the vice president of the center for the national interests -- >> cheese -- vice-chairman. >> dov is also to the comptroller at the pentagon during the george w. bush administration and is the author of a quite provocative memoir published by the brookings institute called "vulcan's tale" how he believes the administration mismanaged foreign policy in afghanistan. and today, we're going to be discussing iran as i mentioned. it could hardly be more timely. the middle east is always in ferment. but today a defense department official was quoted in "the wall street journal" asking who is going to be the person that shoots the arch duke of the middle east? igniting a new world war i. and with the events, with the negotiations in geneva over iran's nuclear program, and the events in yemen, i think it could hardly be a better time to discuss the role that the middle east and iran are playing in american politics. i are goal to david fi

wanderlich breaks down the controversy over hillary clinton's use of personal emails in her years as secretary of state. plus your phone calls facebook comments and tweets. "washington journal" live at 7:00 a.m. eastern on c-span. earlier today, during the white house briefing, we heard more about hillary clinton's use of personal emails and whether her conduct is consistent with the federal records act. this portion is about 15 minutes. >> just, i wouldn't -- this is all sort of interesting. not sure if that's really true. i'm doing my best to make it interesting. >> if you have people reporting to you here at the white house one of your employees came to you and said, i love technology, i'm -- i've got like an old p.c. sitting in my apartment, and i'd like to run a mail server using linux on it and plug it into my fios wireless and i'd like to use that full time instead of my w.h.o. email address to conduct all the business i conduct with reporters and other people in the white house and the government, that would be ok with you? you would offer them guidance against it but at the

clinton's use of e-mail use. here is a look. >> i'm not an expert on federal requirements or state requirements and frankly i'm a little sick of the e-mail drama. but in our state, whether you used a personal e-mail or the public e-mail or a carrier pigeon, it was all a public record subject to disclosure and response. >> next, a look at emerging world markets with mexicanin vertor carlos elom who forbes ranked as the richest person in the world from 2010-2013. from the rand set politics aside in santa monica this is an hour. >> good afternoon. i'm christian combar and i'm the director of rand population, a research division. we want to improve the socioeconomic being of people around the world. i hope that doesn't sound too narrow of a mission statement to you. the rapid growth of emerging economies in the last couple ever decades has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. and rand is happy to contribute to understanding this unfolding story and policy-making to aid it through our work in several emerging economies. it's my pleasure today to introduce the panel this

president's daily brief are in the clinton administration. had the honor to bring to the president every day, the intelligence jewels. the director of national intelligence is the president primary advisor. so he will go to the oval office and present the president's daily brief as well as any additional information. c.i.a. basically provides most of the input into that pdb. we have responsibility for that pdb that continue to endure. it is a very, very impactful -- charlie: so what is the difference in briefing bill clinton and barack obama? who asks the better questions? [laughter] director brennan: oh boy. theyre' two of the most impressive individuals i've had the opportunity to engage with. director brennan: having said that. charlie: having said that. director brennan: they have tremendous ability to absorb information. i was briefing president clinton on something. i would brief them on something new and he would be able to bring it back up and i would have forgotten it. the same thing with president obama. they both have arranges appetite for information. -- have voracious appeti

competitive free market quote unfettered by federal and state regulation. dating back to the clinton administration every fcc chairman republican and democrat vessels let the internet be free from -- though the results speak for themselves. but today the fcc abandons those policies reclassifies broadband internet access service is a title ii telecommunications telecommunication service. it seizes you liberal authority to direct for internet service providers are isps make investments and to determine what service plans will be available to the american public. this is not only radical departure from the bipartisan market-oriented policies of the surge does so well over the past two decades, it's also an about-face from the proposal of the fcc itself made just last may. .. >> >> but to survive judicial review these will be the consequences. higher by bin

. i hear a president and many of his allies like hillary clinton and others that believe you grow the economy in washington. last year, that was a report that showed six of the top 10 wealthiest counties in america are not in new york or california or florida or texas. they are in and around washington. that says to me they think they grow the economy in washington. i believe in america, we believe the vast majority and the rest of us outside of washington -- by the way washington is 68 square miles surrounded by reality -- he will create jobs. it is about time we help the people. [applause] gov. walker: it is why i am proud of the fact that we have lowered the burden in our state. most of the states that have lowered on a plane and raising employment have done so but lowering the burden of hard-working taxpayers. some question my obsession with lowering taxes. the ask me why i am so obsessed with it. i said a simple way of explaining. antoinette and i celebrated our 22nd wedding anniversary recently. [applause] gov. walker: she is probably amazed she hung with me for so long, but

indictment of the political system so much that hillary clinton and for the progressives it isn't as interesting as the last very short period. she talks about income inequality every day. and younger young people are buying it and listening. so that's been interesting and the other piece of it, climate change at don't think we've cracked yet as a country. it's been talked about a day in and day out but we have not seen the mobilization yet and that will change in the same way that we solve a change on the rights but the income inequality already there are politicians talking about it and gaining big attraction. so i think what you will see is more people like that and it doesn't have to be somebody on the left. there is 20 of people who are libertarians and i want to talk about that issue also >> talking about this generation and what we can do maybe we are not going to run into office but we can change how. but when it hits home is gerrymandering. they continue to remain in office. i think the campaign finance is important. that's the way we get people in office. they are creating

clinton introduced with the cosponsorship's of senator obama and senator kerry the oversight of iraq agreements act which dated any status of forces agreement between the u.s. and iraq that was not a treaty approved by the senate or authorized by legislation would not have the force of law. prohibited funding to implement that. for the record, because i do not have time to give at this moment, i would like to ask whether the introduction of that act constituted and interference -- and interference undermining president bush's policy. i fear you have misled this committee and telling us once iran has the rights of a nonnuclear state subject to the additional protocol, you will be able to stop sneak out. you have said first, while they cannot develop a nuclear weapon because that would be illegal, that is a preposterous argument. obviously they are willing to break the law. the next point is, you have conjured up the idea there will be inspections. the question is, inspections of suspected sites. there is nothing in the protocol that adds to the npt. the npt was in force. it took two y

convention on treaties. i should point out for the record that in 2007 senator clinton introduced with the co-sponsorship of senator obama and senator kerry -- the oversight act that stated any status of forces agreement to the united states and iraq that was not a treaty approved by 2/3rd 2/3rds of the senate or legislation would not be authorized and prohibit funding for implement that. for the record because i don't have time to give you at this moment i would like for you to understand whether under the standards of the obama administration the introduction of those act by these three senators constituted an interference with undermining bush's policy. but i fear you have misled the committee in telling us once iran has the rights of a non-nuclear state subject to additional protocols you will be able to stop sneak out. because you said first that well they can't develop a nuclear weapon because that would be illegal. that is a proposporous argument. they are willing to break the law obviously. -- prosporous -- and you say there is going to be inspections and there is nothing that

campaign hillary clinton on domestic issues when we had this weakening of the reform bill should put out a statement saying we can't allow any weakening. we have to defend it. people said, want to see this. does anybody think that what happened in the republican nomination process in 2012 was helpful? why do we want to replicate that? at a financial disadvantage. some of the richest people in the money to that in the world split their money. this is an advanced community. some people did not go far enough. the president criticize them all their money they get to the republicans. we have to save our money. marriage the context is not a good idea. i think we should unite behind her. [applause] >> well, thank you very much a testament to your own career. >> this perception was a problem. the candidacy. the fact that he had zero negative effect. ready for the couple. sending out. >> thank you [applause] >> you were watching booktv in prime time. a reminder every week in booktv features 48 hours of nonfiction books beginning at 8 a.m. eastern on saturday. we invite you to find and like like i

cook talks about efforts to obtain access to larry clinton -- hillary clinton's account. >> former texas governor rick perry spoke at the politics and eggs breakfast on thursday. the potential 2016 candidate discussed foreign-policy issues and the u.s. economy at this event cohosted by the new hampshire institute of politics. this is 45 minutes. >> welcome back. >> good to be here. >> my son set next to you when you came through the last time. he spoke to you about texas and all of that. >> it is happening. what is he doing now? >> he is in pharmaceuticals and going for his masters. ess engineering. senator graham:mr. perry: in what engineering? >> process engineering, it is biomedical tech. he tried to get into texas. mr. perry: there is some fascinating stuff going on in texas -- we became, in this last year -- actually in january 2014, texas became the number one high-tech's exporting state. >> i know, that is going on. mr. perry: people always say texas is an oil and gas state it is gas centric. we are proud of our oral and gas industry, and it plays an important role. it is --

what it is meant to be a. second chance not a way of life. when president clinton signed the welfare reform act he said it's far from perfect legislation, but will go a long way toward overcoming the flaws of the welfare system for the people who are trapped in it. during the ceremony, he also quoted another iconic figure across the aisle, robert kennedy, who said, work is the meaning of what this country is all about. we need it as individuals. we need it -- we need it as a society and as a people. even president franklin roosevelt said in a 1935 address to congress, the sustained welfare program are a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. it is in violation of the traditions of america. work must be found for ablee bodied but destitute works. this budget provides a blueprint for abled bodied working age adults while protecting services for the aged, blind disabled, and children. we get what we incentivize and we are incentivizing able-bodied working aged adults not to work. case in point, in my state, we accepted the free money from washington d.c., for medicaid expansion u

that on the determination and then in 2011, secretary clinton wrote us after some concerns that there was a delay and said this pipeline should be decided by the end of 2008 -- 2011 so i think the administration is moving down that course before they started hearing from the environmental community and you could see the state department was heading down its route with environmental impact statements. they said look this is not environmentally friendly. only downward as things change in the political environment within the administration not on the public side. poll after poll has shown 60 to 70% approval for the pipeline so i think it's changed at the very top of the political administration. >> do believe that canada believes that it's not a question of if but when? >> we think it will get built. the merits are there in the economics are there. canada is going to build pipeline and build real and we have to take advantage of this i think it will. >> congressmen do think it gets built? >> i think the longer this is delayed in a second term the less likely the president will appr

gentlemen please welcome hillary clinton. [applause] thank you all so much. oh, my goodness. that was a walk down memory lane. so many years, so many hair styles. it is wonderful being with you tonight. i have to say i am still kind of in the grand mother demrow six months in it's better than a spa treatment. i highly recommend it. but if there's anything that can compete with it, it is a room u full of women and men who recognize the importance of making sure that all of our people have a chance to live up to their god-given potential. and if that includes running for office, running campaigns standing up and being an advocate, then emily's list has been on the right track for 30 years. and let's hope for 30, 100 more. until we're no longer needed. [applause] now, i want to answer one question right at the start before it stirs up twitter. over the years people have read a lot of different things into my pants suits. so let's settle this once and for all. despite what you might think this outfit is not actually white and gold. i must say that gave us all a little bit of amusement

server used by hillary clinton and what it means for transparency and availability of government information. "washington journal" is live at 7:00 a.m. eastern every morning on c-span. you can join the conversation with your phone calls and comments on facebook and twitter. >> the senate debate over the nomination of loretta lynch to serve as attorney general and human trafficking. martin matishak is following capitol hill for the newspaper. thank you very much for being with us. martin: thank you for having me. >> i want to begin with the house armed services committee. we will hear from ashton carter. we heard last week from john kerry, who has been working on a deal with iran. he has been in switzerland. also we will hear from the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, general martin dempsey. just how contentious will this hearing the -- be? martin: this could be a contentious hearing for secretary carter and martin dempsey. they were up before the senate on late relations committee. they were up for four hours. it raise more questions than it answered about military force aga

the george w. bush administration. as well as the carter and clinton administration. i try to see things objectively. i'm not perfect, but i think on this one, i would give president obama a little credit. i think he has intimidated the iranians. president obama turned up the strengthens -- sanctions. he also threatened twice in 2012 the use of military force. so i think so far so good. and i think david, the journalist of the "washington post" is right. have to hold our government to a high standard. when this deal is presented to the american public, the obama demonstration have to defend it. i think they're headed in the right direction. host: on the timeline for these negotiations, the wall -- "wall street journal" reporting -- the talks broke up on wednesday, and they are to resume march 15. it also says that iran and the six powers are aiming to complete the framework by the end of this month, and seal a detailed agreement by june 30. ron in d.c., an independent caller. caller: hi, how you doing? host: doing well, sir. caller: i am really impressed with mr. burns. what i wou