clinton speaking at the u.n. event about you -- about women's empowerment, i want to bring in mark from "with all due respect your quote -- "with all due respect." mark h: we will see how many questions she takes. they do feel pressure within her camp to deal with it. mark c: peter, mark just talked about the pressure within her camp. if you watched some of the sunday talk shows, some democrats have been asking mrs. clinton to speak out because they feel they have been forced into the position to have to defend her actions. what are they saying now? peter: i mentioned senator dianne feinstein, someone who has been aligned with hillary clinton. i have spoken with other democrats you don't think this will be a huge issue. at least that is what they say privately. but they realize it will become a bigger issue until she confronted directly. so there is pressure coming from democrats for heller jury -- for hillary, if you will to come clean. yes, she is facing pressure from democrats as well. mainly, it is republican

new scrutiny over clinton's time in the state department and gives impression that the clintons tend to play by their own rules. it instead went overseas. a private e-mail account and server could allow e-mails between then secretary clinton and foreign leaders to be permanently deleted. that's put new scrutiny on the clinton foundation a charity that is founded by the clintons to address poverty and gender inequally. >> look across the blue see all the challenges. >> the foundation is highly regarded among development experts and well-funded. since 2001 it has received nearly $2 billion from private donors and governments including saudi arabia and oman. >> despite limits, seven foreign governments in total while she was secretary of state. now those contribution he picked up after she left office and started her second bid for the presidency. >> the real challenge to democracy comes if the gifts to the nonprofits and the an anonymity they allow. >> there have been no specific allegation of misconduct against clinton other than this potential breach of e-mail protocol and the clinto

@blahblah clinton@blahblah clinton@blahblahblah@ clinton@blahblahblah@ clinton@blahblahblah@us.com. >> federal law regarding the use of personal e-mail to do government business changed in 2014, after hillary clinton left her secretary of state post. it is now officially illegal to use a nonofficial e-mail account to conduct public business. unless an employee copies their official e-mail account on the correspondence or forwards a complete copy of the personal account within 30 days. but agencies allowing employees to do business on nonstate department e-mail accounts had to ensure that any records were preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system. this is where it gets really murky. i think we would have faith that all of those isn't over to the archives. and when you add to that, that apparently mrs. clinton and her staff or her staff didn't automatically hand over those e-mails as required, but only after requested to do so, there seems to be a lot more questions still to come. let me know what you think, you can finding my take on my facebook page and at foxnews.com.

jeb bush said good for you, you got bill clinton. he normally will not talk about the clintons. can see he is looking for the jugular. >> and not a big political attack, just an elliptical thing. when is hillary going to take shots at jeb? here is what the clinton camp is actually concerned about. it's the gray lady herself on a scale of one to godzilla how big of a problem is the times for hillary clinton? >> a pretty big problem. the clintons and the new york times have had a historic nemesis like relationship going back to the whitewater stories. the last time hillary ran for president there was a huge blow up over a story about the clintons personal life. there was a big reader backlash about in that story. i do not trust the new york times. there is evidence the new york times is going to put a lot of reporters on this door it can be >> investigative reporters, certain columnists -- put a lot of reporters on the story. i know if there is an irony, that the republicans best friends when the times writes an investigative piece about the clintons, it harkens back to the age wh

clinton and his office. his office get taxpayer money as all former presidents do. i have talked to democratic source hostel me a little new information that actually the server was paid for by bill clinton out of his own pocket. so that would suggest a taxpayers do not own it. >> the problem with that when they do it privately and use their own money and own server, you can't access that stuff through foia. there is a shield. in order to get that information you really need a federal subpoena. >> right. but a subpoena through congress as well is possible is all i'm saying. now you have at least two different republican chairman saying they are trying to get at. there was another big disclosure today with jen psaki that i think is new as well. she said look it wasn't until this past february that we started automatically archiving emails for state department why is that significant. former secretary hunk a lot of this on the idea okay i used a personal account but i knew i was emailing my aides who had state

clinton helped. hillary and bubba will tell you the two are not related but you and i both know otherwise. according to "the wall street journal" secretary of state clinton arranged numerous sweetheart deals with foreign entities on behalf u.s. corporations. that's not necessarily a bad thing. but what happens next is. according to "the wall street journal" many of these companies followed their clinton broker deals with donations to the clinton foundation. consider this, mrs. clinton lobbied the algerian government for ge to build power plants after a multi-billion dollar deal was done ge donated heavily to the clinton foundation. then there's boeing which dropped $900,000 into the foundation after securing a $3.7 billion deal with russia. again, thanks to lobbying from clinton. in fact, at least 60 companies lobbied the state department during her tenure donated more than $26 million to the clinton foundation. the clintons nothing to see here act is offensive. they think the laws don't apply to the

are. >> yes, the clinton foundation. and we should not be accepting money. it's considered bribery. it's considered they're buying time. they are publicly executed in the streets of saudi arabia. women aren't allowed any rights whatsoever. education, they're educating them but not allowing them to drive. what type of human rights is this? she had said in 1995 in beijing that human rights are womens rights and womens rights are human rights. i would like to ask mrs. clinton where have you been since thousands of women, especially in the middle east have been mass slaughtered, our young girls are being sold into sex slavery, we're being beheaded, they're being treated like worse than animals. where have you been if you're an advocate for womens rights? i believe those are just words. i do not believe anything she says. i do not believe she's a human rights advocate. i don't believe a lot of things she says. and honestly accepting millions of dollars worth of foreign donations is horrible. and she's contributing to these cr

neera you worked in the clinton white house. you worked for senator clinton. how do you answer mark? >> i would say that she doesn't see herself as above the law, and that's why -- or different from everyone else. that's why she was following previous secretary of states and now she's going above and beyond. i think it's fascinating how there is people who can read every view of hillary. i was talking to hillary back in 2009. she didn't say she was ever going to run for president again back then and i think that she's presumptions of nefarious activities are just that, presumptions. and now we'll know because she's putting forward her e-mails -- >> this is i think, what bugs people. that the rules were pretty clear. your e-mails should be preserved. you really think when they wrote preserved, i'm not talking about breaking the law. i'm talking about her spokesman said living up to the spirit and the letter of the law you think that's with keeping of the spirit if you don't turn these over while you're secretary of state you don't turn them over when you leave

team clinton says no big deal. everything federal law and regulation mandates is preserved safe and sound, they say. but critics wonder whether to trust that answer, whether her way was a deliberate strategy to delay or defy legitimate requests for documents about taxpayer business and whether her way puts sensitive materials at higher risk of hacking. so ron fournier, you've covered clintons for a long time. team clinton says, listen, you're blowing this out of proportion. it's a media feeding frenzy. critics say, we don't know zsh. >> it's not critics say, it's anybody with a brain in their head and isn't in the tank for the clintons. this is a very clear violation of the regulations. it's a very clear violation of the spirit of the regulation. those are our e-mails. she never should have tried to skirt it. it's not even a matter of debate. this is an issue she's created. it's an issue she can solve. i'll go back. let's go way back to two weeks ago to the foundation, the fact that the foundation was taken foreign

not unlike hillary clinton. but what the sources who i'm talking to here who are close to jeb bush are saying that they're looking for is her explanation of why she used that e-mail that personal e-mail exclusively, and why it took until now to release them when they think that they have a nice jux position between that and the fact that he on his own released hundreds of thousands of e-mails to the public just a couple weeks ago. so certainly democrats are trying to say, a-ha you see, jeb bush has a private server. jeb bush e-mailed on private e-mails. it's not only democrats, it's not only hillary clinton. but they're arguing it's actually a case study in how different kinds of politicians handle this issue in a very different way. >> we're looking at live pictures from the microphone over there. that's where hillary clinton will be walking over momentarily, we're told making a statement, then answering reporters' questions. we don't know if it will be one or two or three questions or a whole bunch of question

e-mails that clinton decided they should get. >> clinton turned over about 55,000 pages of documents. >> i think 55,000 is a pretty big number. >> it is a big number. there are bigger. >> day two of the trial of the boston bombing suspect, dzhokhar tsarnaev. >> six witnesses called by the prosecution wednesday. most victims of the bombing. >> there was no cross-examination by the defense. >> the jury saw footage from a sporting good store, a window shatters, victims flood in. people grab clothes to use as bandages. >> well, here's the deal. we're looking at snow and ice. it is a mess. >> a delta plane skidded off the runway. >> a plane that originated in atlanta. >> laguardia is going to be seeing very limited operations all day today. >> icing is going to continue to be a concern. >> i wanted to build a snowman. >> can you talk us through the fashion of this snowman. oh, no! >> bad roads and airport delays galore. >>> a new 2016 presidential poll taken before hillary clinton's e-mail controversy shows her in a statistical tie with jeb bush within the margin of error, and with a clea

clinton wiggle room there. the intent behind the law for someone as smart as hillary clinton is obvious. we want integrity in the record-keeping process. the gate keeper should be the state department, not the individual who is working for the u.s. taxpayers in this case, of course mrs. clinton. so the problem with the analysis is it's the transparency, it's for historical purposes. it's for congressional year sight purposes. that the individual who is subject to the regulation is not determining what emails are preserved and what emails are not preserved. >> if she chose to go private, which she did, i think collin paul did some of that too when he was secretary of state. she had to preserve them all. i don't think there is any debate about that. but the clinton people say she did. and has handed over everything. >> we don't know. >> and da'da da'da da. >> we don't know what she has preserved. we don't know what she wasn't preserved. that's the reason that any smart person and she went to yale law school. top

you worked in the clinton white house and worked for senator clinton, how do you answer? >> she doesn't see herself as above the line or different from everyone else. that is why she was following the rules as the previous secretary of state and is putting forward an e-mail which is going above and beyond. it and fascinating how people can read every view of her and in twine she was not thinking they would run for president again and the presumption of nefarious activity are just that presumption. >> and the rules were clear, the maims -- rules were clear, living up to the spirit and the letter of the law. is that in keeping with the spirit you do not turn these over while secretary of state when you leave as secretary of state you do not turn them over until two years of leave and after the state department lawyers confront you? >> that is also faster than any rest secretary of state has turned over e-mails. obviously she fund over the mail the previous secretary of state did not turn over. >> jerk josh uses the government e-mail so they are contemporaneously preserved.

clinton. we are right back. rma. checking your credit score is for chumps. i have great credit. how do you know? duh. you know those change, right? tattoos don't change. try credit karma. it's free and you can see what your score is right now. aren't you a little bit curious? i just got my free credit score! credit karma. really free credit scores. really free. i have got to update my ink. i take prilosec otc each morning for my frequent heartburn. because it gives me... zero heartburn! prilosec otc. the number 1 doctor-recommended frequent heartburn medicine for 9 straight years. one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn. okay, listen up! i'm re-workin' the menu. mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals antioxidants and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®. nutrition in charge™. in my world, wall isn't a street. return on investment isn't the only return i'm looking forward to

it is about hillary clinton's e-mails. clinton displays a troubling secrecy. at times, she has been obsessed with secrecy that she show during the first task horse she led during bill clinton's first term in office. she has shown a habit of playing by her own rules and surrounding herself with some questionable judgment. her actions, with regard to the e-mails violated regulations and policies of the obama administration, directing public officials to use public -- government e-mail assistance. her zone for privacy is understandable given her political enemies and scandals. nevertheless, her behavior amounts to ignoring roles of that other have little problem obeying. "usa today" always puts opposing editorial on their lead editorial and today, it is by lanny davis who has worked for hillary clinton over the years. attacks add up to a big nothing is the header. mr. davis writes -- regardless of whether it was located at home, more than 50,000 pages had are ready bit turnover. she asked the state department to review and release them. that is just a little bit

hillary clinton gets 52% in the suburbs, president obama got 48%. when you look demographically she does better than him among some con 12i9 two went, especially blue collar white voters. she holds together most of the obama coalition. she's up on the hill. she has a fortress on the hill. even if they have equal armies, hillary clinton and the represent kachb, they have to go up a hill to take her. >> for republicans, there's two things they have to do, one, knock her on her credentials. another is to quite frankly drive down turnout for people who were on the obama coalition. she'll focus really hard on not just having an advantage with women and minorities but in maintaining that turnout level that obama had. >> the other thing that struck me, 29% hadn't heard of rand paul. 48% hadn't heard of scott walker. it's easy to think that most of america doesn't know who these people are. they have time to define themselves. >> there is a huge hole to fill in their biography and portfolio. you have to deal with the demographic challenges. the republicans

clinton. >> that is true, james. now, what about the time line for her declaration going for the presidency? is that going to be affected by the fund-raising scandal and the e-mail scandal, james? >> well, we have heard -- we heard a week or so ago that she was going to announce in april. we haven't heard anything to contradict that. i'm not sure what she'd gain by postponing an announcement other than it allows her to lie low and avoid questions. i would guess she announces in april as we have heard. unless she decides at some point there's a tipping point and she's not going to run at all. >> why am i absolutely convince we will return to this subject on numerous occasions in the future? >> because it's the clintons. >> so right. >>> when we come back, an impassioned plea from benjamin netanyahu as the deadline looms for the iran nuclear agreement. did the israeli prime minister change any minds on capitol hill? and can congress move quickly to keep the administration's deal making in check? >> the greatest danger

of clinton aides has moved on. some of them are still around, but the next generation just grows up in it. look, they're absolutely secretive. they absolutely want to fight over everything. and they want to sort of muck every issue up. and so, you know, that's what we're going to see. >> braines is a famous person in that world, extremely smart, charismatic guy, working with the clintons for a long time. he's sort of hillary's press person. he today, an amazing thing happened in which this story is going on and he just picks a fight with like nine different reporters. you're seeing more and more of them on the record. >> including my editor in chief. >> including your editor in chief. and he had to retract. which was just a little bit of a window into this. he basically makes a factual case. his point was, if you think we set this up to avoid requests, you're absolutely out of your mind. that's crazy. we would, of course, never do that. he actually is persuasive, i think, certainly in that thread. but in the substa

clinton: the system we used was set up for president clinton's office. it had numerous safeguards. it was on property regarded -- and guarded by the grid service and there were no security breaches. john:, you just talked about the questions you feel she satisfied. what were those that you feel she did not satisfy? market: there were plenty. did she consult the state department? even the documents they put out said they cannot say who they consulted with because it is a matter of security. number two, this question of the freedom of information act and subpoenas. there is some indication that if she e-mails someone outside the government, she made an effort to archive that. but it is not comprehensive. that is one of the most serious things about it. and the last big thing that she did not address was, what was her plan for turning these things over before the state department asked? john: and she assumed the server was secure because it was the same one her husband use. she asserts there was never a security breach. i don't know that is true, or that she would even know whether it

>> it's not going to be against hillary clinton. they have real differences and records that are different. for example, he voted against the iraq war, so there are drchszs, but he's not good to run a campaign, if he decides to run, against her. he's going to run against what he thinks -- >> other than bernie sanders, and i'm sure he will -- >> it's a different kind of campaign not mentioning your opponent's name, but the three that you brought up in the intro, there's no reason for them to jump in negatively right now when the presses doing it for them. >> that's a good point. >> they've all been introduced to the public positively, so why go negative right now when there's no purpose to it. >> harold, it seems like the democrats and the polls are just info hillary, 86%. i've never seen numbers like this. maybe to ed muskie -- just kidding, or teddy kennedy -- but es gill everybody a looking at the polls say only 14% of the democratic party have any problem with hillary clinton. that's not many votes for me. >> i think it's fair to

now. >> another scandal for hillary clinton. >> future president hillary clinton may have to pardon former secretary of state hillary clinton. >> clinton's only public comment to quell the firestorm over her private e-mail system came wednesday on twitter, quote, i want the public to see my e-mail. i asked state to release them. they said they will review them for release as soon as possible. clinton turned over 55,000 pages of e-mails to the state department in december. and according to aides, that's 90% of all e-mails she sent. critics say it was left to her and her staff to decide what was released and that may have been the point. meanwhile the e-mail story is playing into every negative stereotype about the clintons and their supporters that they follow the letter of the law, but not its spirit. >> nobody has disagreed with me as a lawyer that what she did was lawful, lawful. now all the what ifs suppose that, that's not fact. that's speculation. >> but the story plays into a narrative that when it comes to transparency, the clintons drag their feet. >> late tonight, senator a

and secretary clinton i had a cure kerr fluff. i had to have two devices nothing political could be on a white house device. so i had to have a white house email account as did 21 other people at the white house. we were told right at the beginning these are a presidential record. you don't have anything personal that is in there. these these are all presidential record even though they are not on a government account. they will be periodically swept. >> you carry two things around with you. >> you had somebody to carry them for you. >> no i didn't. she did, i didn't. >> but in 2009, when they thought that those records were -- or 2007 when they thought some of those records were lost. one of the first people to go out there and take a two by four to me on it was hillary clinton. how dare the white house have secret accounts that the people cannot see the emails. >> but they found those emails. >> sure. a bunch of them i put them up on my web site. >> i said on the other night this is easily solved because the fbi could go in and

bill clinton and donated $1 million to the clinton foundation. he says hillary would be a good president if she runs. he's still a conservative. he runs news max and plans to support gop nominee, whoever it is. this gives unique insight into clinton critics and how she can counter that. joining me from florida, good morning. >> brian, good to be on with you. >> i know people are always fascinated by the evolution in your relationship to the clintons let's say. how do you explain it? >> well it's a long story. i was very close friend with ed koch former mayor of new york. he introduced me to bill clinton i really started to warm with bill clinton after he left the presidency when i started seeing what his foundation was doing and work he was doing as a post president. he really reinvented the job of being a post president. and i think, and i'm still a very big supporter of the foundation bill hillary, chelsea foundation. they are doing amazing work. i have always found it to be very, very nonpartisan. they have extremely competent people. there's

clinton is they show a trend. when she left the state department she was the most popular politician in america. she's lost that edge. and that's going to come back to hurt her. she's losing the edge without even a campaign against her. and i think it signals trouble ahead for mrs. clinton. >> now, leslie when you heard her today saying that she wasn't going to let anybody look at her server what popped into your mind? >> well bill i'm probably in the major minority here because i know a lot of democrats don't even agree with me on this, but i don't feel there's any there there. i don't feel this is going to take hillary clinton down. i don't think that she and certainly her husband are that stupid. and certainly you can retrieve the e-mails on servers on the other end. i'm not going to work for google tomorrow, and i don't think hillary clinton was either when she was secretary of state. but i don't think this is going to take her down. and i don't think this is as big an issue outside the beltway as the poll you

hillary clinton finally talks about her private e-mails. but the controversy over that arrangement only intensifies. >> i opted for convenience to use my personal e-mail account. i thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal e-mails. >> if she wants somebody to show her how to put two e-mail accounts on one phone, i'm happy to do it. >> we'll talk with a man spearheading efforts to get all of clinton's e-mails. chair of the house, trey gowdy. is this just a personal spear? we'll have a democrat on the committee adam schiff. >>> then a fierce backlash after 47 gop senators send e-mails to iran's leaders questioning a nuclear deal. >> i think it's somewhat ironic to see some members of congress wanting to make common cause with the hard liners in iran. >> we'll discuss the tug of war between the white house and congress with two members of the senate foreign relations committee, john barrasso and ben cardin. >>> plus two ferguson, missouri, police officers are ambushed. reigniting racial tensions. >> th

run and where bill clinton's head is at? >> her head is that it's her term. that's the major rationale. i've paid my dues and put up with a lot of crap. i've put up with bill. it is my turn. bill says she is my wife and gives me the opportunity to be in the white house again. those were great times. let's do it again. for bill, it's like the rolling stones doing a tour at age 70. he wants to go back on the road. >> if she runs, you want her to be the next president. >> absolutely. whoever the democrat is, i want them to win. >> have you heard from other democrats about what you said? >> several indicated that she needs to be tested. if she gets through a tough primary and wins, fine. this entitlement, this anointment, this coronation is not good for the party. i had lunch with a woman today that said it's time we had a woman, and you shouldn't be attacking hillary and made it very clear that she thought i ought to back off. she is entitled to her opinion and i'm entitled to mine. >> mr. chairman, thank you for joining us. >>

clinton's benefit at all. yes, partisans on the left will vote for her no matter what but there are millions of americans in the middle. the exception now is that hillary clinton is not a standup person. she does not put forth the whole truth and nothing but the truth it is true that mrs. clinton has at times been treated unfairly. overall she has been the beneficiary of soft treatment by the media however, that's beginning to change. the email situation has embarrassed the press which largely supported her in the past. it's safe to assume that mrs. clinton will not get the same treatment by president obama hot press continues to idolize. therefore, her road to the white house will be more difficult. that's the memo. now for the top story tonight. as we predicted last night. there will be lawsuits in the case. today the associated press filed suit in washington d.c. demands will state department turn over emails from tenure secretary of state especially concerning ben laden raid. the being stonewalled by the s

clinton was secretary of state. adding to the scandal the clinton foundation's flag ship health program, public health program publishing for its donors back in 2010. turning to the next story if we make the service employees international union releasing a scathing new at hitting chicago mayor rahm emanuel. >> i am up here, chicago never looked better. but down here under rahm emanuel we have seen nearly 10,000 shootings, 50 neighborhood schools shut down and the mayor who hits working people with higher taxes and fees while giving special tax breaks to his friends at the very top. lou: the service employees union endorsing rahm emanuel's rival democrat from like garcia in the runoff elections next month but the union also the target of a lot of criticism early this week. the service employees union funded wisconsin jobs now which organized the appalling and ty law enforcement protest in madison wisconsin just last week. extraordinary. dramatic court appearance for 4 rap mogul suge night who collapsed in a courtroo

this is hillary clinton's base, right? these are the people devoted to elected women of high office and this for them is kind of like a mission of a lifetime. >> absolutely, absolutely. but the number of times i get asked about the inevitable problem, it is not inevitable, it is unprecedented and everybody in this room knows how hard it will be and how much work we have ahead of us and we're really excited about the opportunity to take on that challenge in a successful way finally. and she has been talking about a really, really important policy agenda for the middle class in every speech that she gives. i think the rest of the american electorate is excited to hear about what the next president will do for them. there was not enough of a vision for the voting electorate. so whatever the story of the day will be it will be their agenda. you're at an emily's list event, thank you guys. that is "all in" for this evening, but hang tight because hillary clinton will be speaking later. good evening, rachel. >>> we have an eye o

either bill clinton or hillary clinton on fill in the blank -- fill in the blank issue? so i think the problem that the secretary has is that the 51% thinks that she's done something wrong, thinks she has questions to answer and quite frankly she does. you know speaker boehner calling on her to hand over the server to the benghazi house committee, doing the umpteenth investigation unnecessarily politicizes something. >> in your mind what are the question she has to answer. >> one, why do you have a -- why do you have a private server? two, are we -- can you please assure everyone that all of the documents that are on it that pertain to your time as secretary of state are off that private server? i think what speaker boehner has done to politicize this is to attach it to the house benghazi committee. there have been so many investigations that have shown time and time again that nothing -- none of the conspiracy theories are true. >> it's reminiscent of the 1990s and whitewater. >> the k34i9ee cleared her, controlled by republicans, by the way. >> how can she put the e-ma

coming up someone to defend , hillary clinton because he is an expert on defending the clintons. lenny davis is next. ♪ >> our guest tonight is a veteran defender of the clintons and that is why he is here with us. former white house special counsel lenny davis. when is the last time you spoke to hillary clinton? >> i spoke to her and president clinton at the wednesday night gala at the great foundation that does a lot of great works. wednesday night. >> so recently. various outlets are reporting that secretary clinton will do a press conference, or do some kind of media availability, over the next couple days in new york to address the e-mail controversy. i'm curious, what is the work she needs to get done at the press conference? how should she do it? >> i have no direct confirmation of that. ima friend, and i have no official status. let me clear that up. she simply has to answer the question, why do you do it with both official and private messages on one blackberry. i'm guessing her answer will be nothing nefarious, because the facts do not support that nefarious interpret

this is different if you're hillary clinton. you have a history of office-gating, hiding things and being hyper protective. this is going to be a big problem for hillary. this is not a scandal yet. this is not a candle physical they find something out in these e-mails. >> i want to get back to your point that hillary clinton and the clintons themselves have been under investigation dating back to the white house and white water. is there anybody in washington or in the political circle that believes that knowing that everything they do and say is really under the microscope that she would be so foolish would be the worders to put word, to put something in an e-mail that she would need to erase. >> you would think that if anyone was sensitive to this woulden hillary clinton, but she does not have to public opponent. she's not in the race herself. she is protective, private and wants no transparency, this is a jumping point of that for her. she tried to hide that part of it but making news, as you alluded to, del talking about the

if you don't trust hillary clinton or you think the clintons are shady then that's not going to be do enough. if you do, you do. that rorschach test is going to be the defining feature of the next 20 months. >> right, and also i would expand it, if you are less interested in hillary as the democratic nominee, you may see this as just an opportunity as opposed -- i mean because fundamentally at the end of this, like what is it that we're chasing? really i mean -- what is it we're chasing here? >> that's the question for all -- i want to find out about those cattle futures and know what happened at the rose law firm and whitewater and know why he was on the tarmac getting that haircut. >> the republicans just want the opportunity to go fishing and keep this alive for as long as possible. and so, you know, i mean i would much rather be critical of hillary clinton on a myriad of sort of -- >> this is her thing, right, but this is exactly everyone saying we're back here again which is liberals and people to the left during the clinton years spent all their time divided between frustration

clinton's chances? campbell: it is not going to matter in the primary, because her people have nowhere else to go. core supporters talking about the e-mail scandal -- they can real ethical concerns about that. they never said, we are going to look at the republican. they do not even know who martin o'malley is. in a primary, it is irrelevant. in the general, i think it is background noise unless it is really huge and new. i think her bigger problem in the general and the bigger impression is, what is her vision for the country? she has yet to lay that out and talk about what her agenda is. i think that will dominate more. mark: there is a reason clinton scandals do not break through the way they might. the bar is pretty high if it does not involve impeachment. get back to us. cleanse operation, even now which is not fully formed, is very good at dealing with these things saying, that is an old story. the american people do not care about that. they are good at damage control. something has to be big to

column "clinton burned the tapes," saying if rich around nixon handled watergate the way hillary clinton has handled this he would have survived in the presidency not to compare the crimes of watergate and next on white house to what we know so far here but doesn't he have a point that she deleted 30,000 mails and we do not know if she destroyed the hard drive but she has rendered at the -- a lot of the discussion moot. >> even if you believe the clintons and how they have describe their process the key word searches and they deleted e-mails that were not from doc.gov mail addresses it does not solve the problem. director point that the questions you asked adam schiff there is not just the form oh-109 but 1904 has to be certified by a state department official that the person who removes this has permission. where is that form? was that signed? was it requested? there is all this documentation she hasn't provided in addition to her server in addition to the missing e-mails and until she does these are questions that will follow her around. >> we can agree there are a lot of good tinges,

hillary clinton has been doing these as well. secretary clinton spoke twice in canada. first in winnipeg and then in saskatoon. she spoke at events paid for by a canadian bank. what secretary clinton has not been doing a lot of this year, even as she has continued a pretty robust schedule of paid speeches to make money, what she has not been doing a lot of this year is campaigning for president. and this is one of the really big differences between the republicans and the democrats right now, at the top tier of national politics. all of the republican 2016 hopefuls they have been de facto campaigning at events like cpac where they all gave speeches or did q&a with conservative media celebrities. have they have been appearing at events like steve king's anti-immigration palooza in iowa, they've been speaking at koch brothers, they are speaking to all of the richest public donors. making unfortunate foreign policy flubs. they have been everywhere, right? the republican candidates for president, there are a lot of them right now and they are frequently, every day, multiple

foundation while hillary clinton was secretary of state. we know that that fund took in hundreds of millions of dollars, some of it coming from foreign donors. our next guest is trying to find out exactly what was going on. matt whitaker is a former u.s. attorney and executive director of the foundation for accountability and civic trust a self-described watchdog organization. matt, thank you for being here. a column this week said basically follow the money, he'd been told by a close clinton confidant that that's what you need to do according to a clinton source follow the money to figure out why there's an e-mail controversy why they're missing in the first place. that's what you're trying to do. >> right. we know that the clinton foundation has disclosed most of their donors. we know that while secretary clinton was at the state department she -- the foundation raised millions of dollars from foreign sources including $500,000 from the country of algeria that was in contra vengs of the agreement she had with the state department not to r

during the clinton presidency, bill clinton deployed all the resources of the federal legal apparatus to defend himself. it was like a phalanx around the white house. she's a private citizen. she does not have those resources and, you know, the members of congress trey gowdy, the prosecutor looking into benghazi jason chaff fits are making requests. i can see perhaps a subpoena then perhaps the issue of being held in contempt of congress. not that they'd be able to othat, but that means the issue will be kept alive. >> i suspect that strategy will help mrs. clinton because she will paint herself probably with some success as the victim of a congressional witch-hunt. >> oh, so you're saying republicans should drop it? >> well, i think they should be careful politically about how they go about doing this. i think quite frankly what this scandal reminds democrats a column by the late bill safire that mrs. clinton in his words is a congenital liar. and i think that this is being felt very powerfully not simply among republicans who have always felt this or conservatives who suspected this