gauntlet on both side of the aisle. there are reports that said susan rice just moments ago agreeing to testify before the house intelligence panel. ned, your initial thoughts on this susan rice bombshell. >> i have been calling for the house intelligence committee to bring her up on the hill to testify under oath. did sue and rice and her deputy ben rhodes follow n $sa protoc protocol -- nsa protocol? i have been advocating this for months. the trump administration and the gop need to go back on this. it could be bigger than watergate. charles: betsy, how do you see it? >> i have seen reports her testimony will be in a closed session. so it won't be as re revalatorys comey's testimony was. how that information gets used. what kind of accountability government officials have. the foreign surveillance intelligence act is up for renewal this year. susan rice's role in this issue is central. charles: we are watching president trump and the first lady as they await president moon from south korea. there is a lot going on in that korean peninsula. charles: from the comey testimony and the

served cimino subpoe. susan rice, john brennan and samantha power. the inclusion of samantha power has raised some red flags. judge andrew napolitano said this. >> should've had nothing to do with this unless it was for political purposes, so the unmasking is a below the radar screen crisis. occurred at the tail end of the obama administration when they began to fear hey, donald trump might win. >> eboni: michael, i appreciate the judge's enthusiasm. we all know unmasking is not a legal and we the definition, it's a subjective standard. i think that's what's frustrating. eric, you point out how dangerous it is. all anybody has to say is susan rice, she said she needed to know who these people are. where is the crime? >> michael: we have political warfare in this country and we had it for decades. it's only now that the right has started fighting the left, yesterday was having awful comedian with the horrible cartoon. >> eboni: who? >> michael: kathy lee gifford i think. when the corporate press thinks it's her problem, when -- they have to be held with their feet to the fire. >> er

security advisor susan rice had to testify under oath about allegations of unmasking of names and intel reports. rice has been under fire for her alleged role in revealing the name to trump associates during the election. for her part, she's done nothing wrong. more on this in a few moments inside a "america's newsroom." another alert now on a friday morning, the breaking development over president trump's top priorities, number one the travel ban limiting trade to the u.s. from six muslim majorities is no effect. how will that affect us? meanwhile, health care reform facing an uncertain fate on capitol hill. senate republican trying to find a -- i am bill hemmer, split broadcast prefrontal trip this week, i am bill comer live in washington and shannon, how are you doing? >> shannon: i am doing great as we go into this holiday we can live from new york. president trump applying new pressure to senate republicans to get something done on health care. this morning, if republican senators are unable to pass what they are working on now, they should immediately repeal and then replace

to russia and the election. now, a new interview with susan rice has raised similar questions. good evening, everybody, i am martha maccallum and here is "the story" for the former obama national security advisor choosing to write and once again on her role in the unmasking on trump officials. at first, she said she knew nothing about these allegations. >> during the transition, after president trump had been elected, he and the people around him may have been caught up in surveillance of foreign individuals and their identities may have been disclosed. >> do you know anything about this? >> i know nothing about this. >> martha: weeks later, she came clean on the role that she played in this process of unmasking certain american citizens. but she claimed at the time that although it was done, it was not improper. >> within that process, and within the context of the trump campaign, the trump transition, did you seek the names of people involved -- did you unmask the people involved in the trump transition, campaign, people surrounding the president-elect deduced did do spy on them?

included the nsa, the fbi, the cia, it included susan rice, powers, brennan, people became giddy with excitement that perhaps we will get to the truth finally. in responding to requestsvery for information regarding those foreign intelligence surveillance activityings. charles: i also hear the nsa is not exactly, you know, cooperating that much either. what do you make of it then? going back to the end of president obama, former president obama's term where he allowed -- he gave the power for so many people to be able to do this. obviously, creating an atmosphere where leaks became so much more possible. really rewrite history as to how the obama administration is viewed. charles: real quick, matthew, i want to get your thoughts of a report i saw in "the new york post" that journalists are now being surveilled to help find out where these leaks are possibly coming from. first, your thoughts on the legality of that, and do you would be a lot of concern trying to figure out where these leaks are coming from. charles: matthew whitaker, thank

information from those ages about requests made by the individual. in a include for form -- susan rice. john brennan, samantha power, all of these officials seeking to unmask the names of trump campaign officials, the come i -- committee seeking classified documents from the agents, so far the committee has met nothing but resis stanlt froresistance from the agent, james rose we rosen with our report. reporter: fbi concerned they were served with sou supervisorinas, each named as figures of interest three senior obama era officials, former "house" national security adviser susan rice was dedicated last month. rice at the time denied wrong doing and told us today she is unaware of subpoenas directed at her, and john bron an was also named in the declineys of in the land. brennan declined our request for comment, the soup en' naimi of samantha power, she is a former. >> she served in barack obama senate office before joining his administration. they are now devoting greater scrutiny to power, they don't to see her roll. contacted by fox news, power declined to come, today's disclose use well s

furious what they did with the warrant and she said so. it's not only susan rice. most of the unmasking is done at the request of the fbi. so it is mr. comey who needs to testify about this too. it's mr. clapper who needs to testify about this. mr. brennan. the point of congress is not to, as you know, charge anybody with anything. it's trying to figure out what took place from a legislate of perspective. let's get those people in, let's get them under oath, let's find out about unmasking, let's find out about the whole thing. because mr. nunes, he was stunned. he's not a right wing cook, he's a moderate traditional republican from california. when he saw the stuff, he was flipping out. i think we do need to get to the bottom of this. >> eboni: what are you looking forward to hear? >> echoing your point, i think it will be ultimately a a to make anti-collective anti-climactic. i don't think she's going to give up any information because it's about speaking points image to make an agenda. >> kat: i don't think this is one of these instances where, okay, it's legal, keep living how we are

we will see you tomorrow . ♪ ♪ ♪ >> fbi director james comey in the spotlight preparing to testify next week before the senate intelligence committee, but could the president invoke executive privilege and slam the door shut on his testimony about his conversations with the president. hello and welcome to a brand new hour inside america's news headquarters i'm kelly wright. >> at least one report says it's not a likely move. kelly: kristin with more. kristin. >> the question for president trump will be what will be more damaging what comey will say in public for all the world to see or what it would look like if president trump tries to mussel him. >> that committee hearing was just noticed and obviously it's got to be reviewed. >> so that's not a no. >> i'm just saying, literally in my understanding the date of the hearing was just set, i have not spoken to counsel yet, i don't know how they're going to respond. >> now, the new york city is reporting that two senior officials are saying that president trump will not invoke executive privilege but as we have learned time and time again nothing is final with this white house until it -- until it actually happens. so with that caveat, i want to take a look at another huge hearing taking place on capitol hill next we're and this one involves the intelligence chief, nsa director, acting fbi director and deputy attorney general who signed off on this special council, that's taking place, the day before comey's appearance and we also learned that the special counsel that's investigating possible ties between trump campaign and russia, that special counsel is expanding to take over a separate criminal probe involving former trump campaign manager paul manafort. with all of the stories and all of the leaks, all of the potentially damaging testimonies that's going to be taking place next week on capitol hill, you can see why this white house has been scrambling behind the scenes to set up room. we have been hear two names quite sometime and two former campaign operatives. fox has learned that this room will be run outside of the white house likely as a nonprofit, so the idea let the outside entity handle the russian investigation so the white house can get down to the business of actually governing, kelly. kelly: it's going to be a very busy week, next week. kristin reporting live from the white house today. arthel: thank you very much for talking to us. first of all, trump insiders are saying that president trump doesn't want to block comey's testimony and why would he if he has nothing to hide. there's been no evidence of collusion between russia and the campaign and so why not get the truth out there. do you believe that anybody from the trump administration will want to block comey's testimony? >> well, you know, on the legal point about whether the president has the authority to invoke executive privilege, i think the people that are suggesting somehow is right to invoke that right now is somehow in question. they don't know what they're talking about. he has absolute right to invoke that privilege in this case. but i don't think he will and i don't think that -- and i think he's smart not to and the reason for that, julie, is because we largely know what the answer to the all of the questions the democrats are asking about this, did donald trump do anything to impede the investigation to obstruct justice and, you know, fbi director comey has testified on at least two occasions very clearly and also behind closed doors in conversations with both democrats and republicans that in no way does he think the president has done anything to obstruct that, whatever the testimony he gives as long as it's along those lines it's only going to help the president and if he veers from that, i think he will get grilled pretty good. julie: okay, so comey's testimony is expected to focus on these private meetings with the former fbi director. memos specifically and those memos are the ones that he said he might release and that he had taken notes on the conversations which he said president trump had at one point asked him to go ahead and drop the investigation on michael flynn. president trump says that conversation never took place, so what about those internal memos do you believe could potentially be harmful if he were to testify? >> well, i think that -- the reason i think that those that his testimony will ultimately be helpful is because all we have heard from those memos are cherry-picked lines out of contest that were read to certain reporters who obviously had, you know, they were writing stories that were very damming about donald trump, and so once you get those lines put into context, that can only help donald trump. they were obviously looking to find damming thing that they could find and i think that will be helpful. i don't know, though -- and the most important thing here about those conversations is that clearly comey did not feel like there was an effort to obstruct justice because if he did feel like there was an effort to obstruct justice by the president, he would have been obligated at that time to open investigation into that specific charge and the fact that he didn't, i think, if he does try to build a case now -- julie: right. >> based on what we know so far it's going to be a radical dye parture from what we know or what he has said. julie: legal experts. here is what legal experts say. they believe that president trump does not have a strong case to invoke the privilege due to public acknowledgment of the conversations he had with comey, the question and the concern from an outsider is what was the intent, what was the motive for comey at the time to jot these notes down and what was the temperature in the conversations, was it a joke, was it like, oh, come on, back off. >> i think that's exactly the tenure of it. julie: i don't know if it was the latter. >> two things, the fact that comey wrote these things down not only is that not unusual, that is by law what all officials -- anybody else in the federal government is supposed to do after a private meeting with another federal official. it's all part of the open meetings act, they're supposed to do that. obviously comey to his credit was somebody who always did that or at least routinely did that and he should be saluted for that because that's a very good thing for those of us what want the inner workings of the federal government to be made public. julie: that's right. >> so people trying to make that into something sinister has always puzzled me, i don't know what that's all about. my impression is that very much what you just said, maybe not joking around but perhaps powing around a little the americans will do the right thing. kelly. kelly: thank you, ellison. >> you bet. julie: a series of explosions killing at least six people who were attending a funeral. this comes days after a massive truck bomb killed 90 people and wounded 500 more. violent protests are entering their third or second day, rather with demonstrators calling for more computer in the capitol city. john is live in the middle east bureau with the very latest, hi, john. >> kabul is on police lockdown tonight because of the protests as you mention yesterday and today and because of latest violence, the bombing at the funeral proving yet again that really no one and no place is safe in afghanistan in particular, the country's capital even as i said even at funeral. afghan officials say the blasts went for the son of afghanistan deputy speaker of the senate, his son was one of four people killed during those violent protests yesterday in kabul. federal high-ranking afghan officials were at the funeral today when the explosions erupted carried by suicide bombers according to suiter officials that were posing as mourners in estimated 1,000 people. those officials including government's chief executive were unharmed but latest attack an example and chaos and violence gripping afghanistan after wednesday's truck bombing in kabul's diplomatic killing 90 people and injuring 50 others. yesterday as mentioned, more than a thousand protestors hit the streets of kabul and asking for the resignation of afghan president over they say crumbling security and clashing with police that opened fire upon the crowds and today another protest was held at the site of wednesday's bombings. julie, while no group has claimed responsibility for these attacks for the latest attacks, government officials say it was most likely the work of the taliban jeopardizing peace talks that were scheduled in -- that are scheduled to start tuesday in kabul and creating a bloody start to the holy muslim month of ramadan. julie: thank you. kelly: multiple officers shot while trying to arrest the dangerous suspect, details straight ahead on how this all played out. julie: new pushback against sanctuary cities as the state faces legal challenges. a fair and balance debate coming up next. (vo) pro plan bright mind adult 7+ promotes alertness and mental sharpness in dogs 7 and older. (ray) the difference has been incredible. she is much more aware. she wants to learn things. (vo) purina pro plan bright mind. nutrition that performs. if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious.while not , pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach. kelly: welcome back, time now for quick headlines, three police officers injured in laredo, texas, antonio rodrÍguez was suspected of killing his girlfriend earlier in the day, he was shot and killed by police. a naval flight officer sentenced to prison after being convicted of espionage. lieutenant commander edward lynn pleaded guilty to deliberately disclosing information and families who disclosed foreign contact among foreign charges. a former nsa official says nsa conducted likely surveillance of winter olympic in salt lake city current head of nsa operation says the surveillance was limited to only international communications with potential links to terrorism. julie: house intelligence committee ramping up its investigation into russia's election meddling and now issuing seven new subpoenas including three that could shed some new light on allegations top obama era officials improperly sought to unmask trump campaign members swept up in the probe. republican joins me now, member of the house appropriation committee, subcommittee member of homeland security and former navy seal. congressman, thank you. just give me your interpretation when you hear about these seven subpoenas, what does that make you think. >> they are concerning. this isn't a partisan issue, it's an american issue. something that has been successful. at the same time there are very strict procedures. obviously what we are seeing, we saw that it was revealed that susan rice, her request to unmask them, the fact that samantha power was being subpoenaed, whether she was the one asking for that or she had information is particularly concerning given the fact that she's a diplomat and clearly there would be politics that play here. american -- the american people have to be concerned about a fire wall and national security and it's right that the congress execute authority. julie: politics that play here, those words are serious, those are criminal words because if there is proof that in fact, this was politically motivated that is illegal. it is legal for intelligence purposes but to unmask for political purposes is illegal and there should be subpoenaed and should be investigation and should have happened a long time ago. three of the subpoenas were issued to the cia, the fbi and the nsa seeking details related to the alleged unmasking and those are requests made by the former national security adviser susan rice. why is it then that this investigation somehow seems to have been covered up and then now all of a sudden we are hearing about it? >> well, you have a different administration now. look, folks were unmasked, names were leaked, some of those the requests for the unmasking had to be given a request to the intelligence community so they should be subpoenaed to figure out who requested it, where it went and so people if there was requested, they had the information, the information was leaked, there are big problems here and again the american people have to have confidence that there's a fire wall between politics and national security and as you said, if in fact, people were unmasking american citizens and politically motivated way, you have a crime here. i'm not saying that you do. i don't have facts yet. let the facts lie where it may and it's important for the confidence of the american people. july you we talked about the three subpoenas, four others issued wednesday focused on former trump campaign aide michael flynn and that has played into the former fbi director james comey and whether he would testify. let's talk about the subpoena of michael flynn, what do you think they'll find there? >> you know, i'm not really sure, i know, listen, there's a lot of political football going here and what i will say underlying in all this issue is the fact that the united states doesn't have a uniform policy. there's no policy there, there needs to be a policy. that being said, michael flynn has been subpoenaed, was there some wrong-doings there, has been investigated for some months by the fbi and if folks did something that was criminal or was wrong, they should be held to account and that includes anyone in this country. julie: but here is what i don't understand because it's not like michael flynn wasn't forthright with the administration. i mean, he went to the vice president and explained his history, susan rice apparently had gone to then campaign and candidate president trump before he became elected and explained that there was some reason why he might be able to be blackmailed by russians. none of this was a surprise and when vice president came out and he said he had no idea that he had any financial dealings as we know with other countries, apparently that was a surprise to the vice president. so there's some disconnect here. i guess we need to help connecting the dots, maybe you could do it. >> i wish that i could connect those dots for you, i don't know all those things, i know -- listen, i want to say that michael flynn has served this country with honor for decades. it's important to say that. his name has been smashed around and let's not forget that this man served this country very honorably for a very long time. if there's an issue here and there's something that he needs to be held accountable for, okay, that will happen but at the same time that should not negate his service to this country. julie: absolutely, i agree. >> there is some disconnect there and i don't know exactly what that is and neither does anybody else quite frankly, all the other signs of my political -- other political party is out there constantly talking about. julie: you know what else i also find is the fact that you have the former obama administration and officials like susan rice coming out saying that michael flynn is a bad guy, they have been keeping an eye on him and they didn't trust him and they thought he wasn't going to be the right person for the job and he has full security under president trump, he has full security clearance to go to russia and to meet with officials there, they had no problem with him at that point. at what point did they change the mind about michael flynn, if they didn't like him, they they wouldn't have given him security clearance. there's a lot of politics in play. >> i don't think susan rice was good for the job she was in. i don't agree with that whatsoever. i don't question her clearance. she was cleared. no problem. it's been revealed that she requested more unmasking of names and with a greater volume after the election. julie: i'm just saying do not give security clearance to someone that you think the russians are going to use to blackmail the united states. i mean, what? >> there's no question. julie: yeah, no. anyway, congressman, thank you very much. appreciate it. >> thank you, have a great day. julie: so fun, kelly. kelly: antitrump protestors are rallying nation hide the march for truth. coming up the answers they're seeking. you don't let anything keep you sidelined. that's why you drink ensure. with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. for the strength and energy to get back to doing... ...what you love. ensure. always be you. usaa gives me the and the security just like the marines did. the process through usaa is so effortless, that you feel like you're a part of the family. i love that i can pass the membership to my children. we're the williams family, and we're usaa members for life. remember dad helping you catch your first fish? then tell him he's special with great father's day gifts from bass pro shops. like new mr. steak propane patio grills, for steakhouse quality results right in your back yard. ostriches don't really stick vitheir heads in the sand.ve horns on their helmets. and a real john deere is actually real affordable. you learn something new everyday. the surprisingly affordable john deere e series tractors. it can seem like triggers pop up everywhere. luckily there's powerful, 24-hour, non-drowsy claritin. it provides relief of symptoms that can be triggered by over 200 different allergens. live claritin clear. julie: antitrump rally going outside today of the white house for climate agreement and collusion between president trump and russia. one of those rallies wrapped up moments ago. hey, garrett. >> these are grassroots and all of these rallies has really changed a bit. organizers say that they are wanting to put the pressure on both mueller and congress to investigate any ties between the campaign and russians. >> i want to see the investigation of trump lead to impeachment. i'm please to see that mueller is right on top of it and is proceeding quickly along with that half of the investigation, that part of the investigation to bring criminal charges again those around trump and including trump. >> organizers say that there are more than a hundred marchs scheduled and climate change was another issue, a lot of folks came out for after the president's decision to leave the paris climate deal but at the white house the president supporters came out as well and said thank you for keeping that campaign promise. [inaudible] >> but the reality is we need to support. >> a lot of the activists groups, julie, have said march for truth rallies is just the beginning of what they're calling a summer of demonstrations, julie. julie: thank you very much. kelly. kelly: julie, thank you, the cities of san antonio and austin are suing the state of texas in an effort to block the sanctuary city law. republican greg abbott signed a bill into law and argues the law is unconstitutional and more cities and counties may soon follow suit. so let's talk about this with immigration attorney francisco hernÁndez, francisco, your impression of the law to begin with? >> it's a political phantom. it's a fight between lieutenant governor and the speaker of the house of representatives. it doesn't do anything to police officers that weren't already allowed to do and doesn't do -- give them any direction or any obstruction or obligation. it is really a political gain between politicians. it does nothing. there's no such thing as a sanctuary city, a city cannot oppose the federal government. i can come in and pick anybody from any local jail they time they want and the problem is that they are taking the bait and it is unconstitutional just like we were 15 years with arizona and restrictions, bottom line is time for congress act. kelly: let me bring what governor greg abbott has said and how he defines the law, one it would be a 25,000-dollar per day fine on any sanctuary city and also exposes any sheriff or official to jail time if they failed to cooperate with ice or federal officials when they have known criminals in their custody who should be according to them deported. >> it has never happened. kelly: in san francisco there have been people that have been killed by illegal immigrants. >> it is not true. kelly: what do you mean it's not true? >> the problem is ice didn't pick them out within the 48 hour, the ice hold provides. the person transferred from la to san francisco on a minor violation, the ice hold means give them -- kelly: one second there. you're telling me then that that person who killed that young girl who was out with her father -- >> yes. >> should have been allowed to go free, no one should have turned him in? >> there was no legal ice. kelly: you have to be kidding me? we can't bring back the young lady. >> you're right. coal = illegal immigrant shouldn't have been on the streets and already known for committing crimes and here in texas apparently and goes onto say, the governor telling "fox & friends" moments a day after he initiated this and signed this bill into law which becomes effective by the way in september, that we have to pass the law to force law enforcement to comply with the law, your response to that. >> exactly. it was already the law. >> states try to do this patch work in that void in congress. that guy should have been in federal prison. we had five shots at it and we let him go each time but it wasn't because of sanctuary city, it simply because ice didn't pick him up. let me tell you, they do a very good job but they are not asking for the city's assistance and cooperation, they don't need it and they don't want it. kelly: why shouldn't there be cooperation when you have a known criminal element that happens to be illegal and should have been deported and has committed previous crimes? i'm not understanding the comment there? >> let me tell you when an undocumented goes to jail, immigration sends immigration hold, ice, sends immigration hold that say ifs you're going to let him go for any reason, give us 48 working hours to come and pick him up, fair enough? in those 48 hours pass up and ice didn't come pick him up, there's no way to hold him because there's no other charges. kelly: francisco, you're going ahead with this to try to block the state from actually enacting the law which as i said earlier becomes law effectively in september. other state officials, san antonio mayor who called the lawsuit premature noting that san antonio was the first city to join litigation despite others being invited. you're jumping out in front. do you think others will follow suit and stop the governor of pushing the law through, it's already the law of the land as of september? >> it was already under the constitution. we don't need this bill, it's a waste of time by both sides. it's political posture to go keep the issue going because congress refuses to act. kelly: state attorney general is opposing you or any other person trying to follow litigation. >> i think he's under indictment for fraud. he is under indictment. >> all right, francisco hernÁndez, this is going to be a heated debate obviously as it's been in the lone star state and a lot of people watching this. you're saying it doesn't have to be. we will see what happens in the court of law and see how you guys fair on that as well as the state which has to defend itself actions as well. >> i'm not filing a lawsuit, it's a waste of time. >> all right, francisco, thank you. julie: veterans gathering in our nation's capitol and remember the service members who lost their lives. plus president trump under fire for pulling out of the paris climate agreement but some think the criticism will come no matter what the president does. >> if the president would have chosen not to pull out of the accord, the right thing to do is to pull out, if he did, the mainstream media would attacked him for flip-flopping and having my friends think doing this at my age is scary. i say not if you protect yourself. what is scary? pneumococcal pneumonia. it's a serious disease. my doctor said the risk is greater now that i'm over 50! yeah...ya-ha... just one dose of the prevnar 13® vaccine can help protect you from pneumococcal pneumonia- an illness that can cause coughing, chest pain, difficulty breathing, and may even put you in the hospital. prevnar 13® is approved for adults 18 and older to help prevent infections from 13 strains of the bacteria that cause pneumococcal pneumonia. you should not receive prevnar 13® if you have had a severe allergic reaction to the vaccine or its ingredients. if you have a weakened immune system, you may have a lower response to the vaccine. the most common side effects were pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site, limited arm movement, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, joint pain, less appetite, vomiting, fever, chills, and rash. get this one done! ask about prevnar 13® at your next visit to your doctor's office or pharmacy. we always take time getting to know you, so we can ensure you hear what matters most in your world. grandpa! (vo) call, click or come in today to learn how to start your better days. miracle-ear...hear a better day. julie: world war ii memorial in washington as veterans lay wreaths to mark the 75th anniversary of the battle of midway, it is considered one of the most brutal naval battles in world war ii and help turn the tide against the japanese fleet in the pacific. battle of midway took place six months after the attack on pearl harbor and it was a decisive victory that put the u.s. navy on the offensive in the specific theater. we thank our brave veterans for their service. >> the white house sending off backlash for the mainstream media for its decision to pull out of the paris climate deal but will the pull-out make a big of a difference or is it just a huge overreaction from the left. joining us now to discuss all of this is brad blakeman, former assistant to george w. bush and adrienne, former director of strategic communications for hillary clinton and a democratic strategists. thank you both for joining us. >> thank you. >> adrienne, let's begin with you, what do you say about this over the president making the decision to pull out of the paris accord? >> well, first of all, i don't necessarily a lot of -- but i will say that i think this plays right into donald trump's plans. he wanted the media to oversight issue and oversensationallize it and paint at elitist issue. it's something that we should all be concerned about. kelly: brad, your thoughts. >> the present danger to the world and i wish the world can get together on issues like radical islam which is a direct threat to our country here and proliferation of nuclear weapons than climate change. president obama thought it was so important not only for the country but for the world, he would have called the procedure that would ratify by the senate. he didn't do that and president trump campaigned on repealing this terrible agreement for america that was inequitable, unfair, job-killer, so it's no surprise that he did it, but, of course, the media in america has become a globe -- globalist. they don't have an national interest to our country. they have become citizens of the world and donald trump promised and delivered, something that is not seen by politicians. so thumbs up for donald trump to keeping his word and getting america out of a terrible agreement. kelly: adrienne, what i watch the people that are concerned about this and many people by the president's position, some had anticipate that had this would happen that he would keep campaign promise u the future, what does it hold for america in terms of its global view and its global position with the president making this decision? >> well, i mean, it's terrible for our future. the world looks to america for leadership on issues such as climate change. kelly: does it look to america in terms of financially helping solve all their problems which is happening as part of this deal as i understand, america was paying most of the bulk of what was needed for this? >> well, look, again, at the end of the day the good news here is this is not -- this is a nonbinding agreement. there are mayors from across the country in the united states, there are companies that are coming together and making sure that we stick with the paris accord that all of the terms laid out in the agreement so that we can maintain responsibility to the agreement without being part of this agreement. so, you know, i'm hoping that donald trump will try to renegotiate terms for the united states so we can bring agreement in the future. it'll be very difficult to do. we lost significant credibility from a global standpoint. there are companies and local leaders across the country who are doing their job to make sure that we adhere to the importance layed out in the agreement. kelly: brad, to adrienne's, point, there are many people in the united states, california, pittsburgh, they're all basically saying that they will somehow, some way keep an agreement with this paris accord on climate change. the president is saying that he wants to renegotiate it and the then you have the international backlash of macron and france and angela merkel of germany and other nations stepping up to say or actually denounce what the president's decision was. what does the president need to do to bring this to the table and negotiate a deal that would be fair and balance for the united states? >> a deal is good as only it is for both parties. this deal was bad for america, barack obama knew that and that's why he didn't go to the senate and if anything, when you talk about credibility, america's credibility is now enhanced because finally people can say when the president talks, he means what he says and he's going to do what he says, something the that pander of appeasement and apology has been the last eight years. as far as local officials, states and cities honoring this agreement, more power to them. if they think it's in the best interest of constituents, they should do it. that's what america is about. local rule. not coming from the federal government. if the state of california and others and cities want to honor this agreement, then they should. kelly: brad and adrienne, i wish we could get you to final word. we have to go. i appreciate both of you sharing the comments and insights on this explosive issue that's going to likely continue for some time to come. thank you. >> thank you. julie: legal battle over president trump's travel ban is now reaching the nation's highest court. the latest on the show boost. it's about moving forward, not back. down. for when you need a little extra. boost® the number one high protein complete nutritional drink. be up for it julie: asking the supreme court to revise president trump's travel ban, lower courts have so far ruled the administr

request by national security adviser susan rice, former cia john brennan and former u.n. ambassador samantha power. the committee will find out how and why the names of the associates were on regard to distributed within classified resorts between administration. senior committee aides say the subpoenas related to the asking issue would have been sent to chairman david nuÑez without democratic removed. the first issued in the russia probe soap are -- so far. democrats seek an investigation into president trump and his associates in republicans pushing for the probe into the unmasking. cheryl: so interesting because this goes back to the days of the obama administration. they are not innocent in all of this. lauren: the former u.n. ambassador, a lot of people not expecting that one. thank you so much. i want to point out the will to to david for now and interpeak on this topic and just a little bit. cheryl: also following this on hillary clinton this morning. she is on the attack blaming russia for her loss to donald trump in the presidential election and accusing the white house to

folks being looked at for possible unmasking of those names, susan rice, now asking why me and then smack you living on the answer. what she says and if she is right next. (dog) mmm. this new beneful grain free is so healthy... oh! farm-raised chicken! that's good chicken. hm!? here come the accents. blueberries and pumpkin. wow. and spinach! that was my favorite bite so far. (avo) new beneful grain free. out with the grain, in with the farm-raised chicken. healthful. flavorful. beneful. you totanobody's hurt, new car. but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they'll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. >> kennedy: top senate democrat chuck schumer using the senate rules to unmask members

house intelligence committee. >> reporter: sources are telling me and our colleague that susan rice, the former obama national security adviser has agreed to testify behind closed doors of the house intelligence committee next month. this comes as republicans have accused susan rice of unmasking the names of officials, trump transition officials in countless reports. they believe she acted improperly and did not handle classified information according to regulations. this is something that susan rice has adamantly denied and said she has done nothing withdrawn. people who have reviewed say she has done nothing wrong. she has agreed to testify behind closed doors as part of the investigation and the house side which is ramping up as they try to interview a number of high profile witnesses next month not only susan rice but roger stone and both trump advisers who agreed to talk to the committee in the coming weeks. >> they will be very busy. thanks very much. we are hearing new rumblings that senate leaders are not likely to draft compromise bill by tomorrow as hoped. let's go to ryan nobl

would. >> bret: there are subpoenas out for the house intelligence committee for susan rice, john brennan, and the samantha power, the former u.s. ambassador to the united nations about this unmasking issue. this is the democrat of the house until committee questioning all of this. >> i don't know what the chairman had this in mind because we weren't consulted and why the chairman is picking these three people apart aside from the fact that they were part of the obama administration. if susan rice has been a perennial target for whatever reason, but again, we have a very little insight into what the chairman is doing here and i think the only guidance we can get is what we hear coming out of the white house. if this is what the white house wants to see happen, they would rather be talking about these issues. >> bret: were back with the panel, the coverage of this is a long -- track, not really the substance of the unmasking. >> when you're looking at the actual things that are going on with these investigations, we do have evidence of crimes, leaked u.s. persons information to end

figures of interest three senior obama-era officials. susan rice was identified by multiple news organizations last month as someone who requested that names of trump associates that had appeared in coded form and classified intelligence reports be identified for her, or unmasked. rice denied wrongdoing at the time and told us today that she's unaware of any subpoenas "directed at her." john brennan was also named on the subpoenas. in testimony last week, he decried the leaks of classified information. john brennan declined our request for comments. in the naming of samantha power, the former u.n. ambassador who has not previously serviced and the controversy. power served in barack obama's senate office before joining the administration. house investigators told fox news they are devoting greater scrutiny to power because they have come to see her role in the unmasking as larger than previously known, allegedly eclipsing the others named. contacted by fox news today, power declined to comment. today's disclosures about samantha power may explain a somewhat cryptic exchange that

answer. >> susan rice, president obama's former national security adviser agreed to testify before your committee next month. what do you want to ask her? >> you know, susan rice is primarily of interest to people. i'm telling what they have said publicly, interest of people focussed on the issue of unmasking. did susan rice -- >> is she of interest to you? >> it's not clear to me what she may or may not know. i will say this about unmasking. it is a word that sounds ominous. it's something that happens every single day on the part of senior administration officials when they need to look at a masked u.s. person's name to understand the intelligence they are looking at. of course, it's something we take seriously here. you are, in fact, exposing a u.s. person's name to a senior official. as a result, that is surrounded by lawyers, audited by inspector generals. there are those making allegations if susan rice may have unmasked something. maybe she did. the question is was it unproper? i have no reason to believe it is. she has aggressively denied she did any improper unmasking. my guess

coming on. >> bill: 20 minutes past the hour. former national security advisors susan rice speaking out about recent criticism about her time in office and why she says that race and gender are the reasons why she was targeted in the unmasking scandal. we'll tell you all about that. also there is this. isis militants losing ground in syria and in iraq and now looking for a new front. why one top u.s. commander says the terrorists have found their new battleground. we'll tell you where that is next. ♪ if you have bad breath and your mouth lacks moisture when you speak or swallow, you may suffer from dry mouth. try biotène®, the #1 dentist recommended dry mouth brand. biotène® provides immediate relief from dry mouth symptoms that last for up to four hours. in fact, biotène® is the only leading brand clinically proven to soothe, moisturize, and freshen breath. don't just manage dry mouth symptoms with water, soothe, moisturize and freshen your breath, with biotène®. this has been medifacts for biotène®. what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. ♪ everybody two second

. word that susan rice will testify now before the house intelligence committee as part of their investigation into the unmasking of trump officials towards the end of the obama administration. >> the president is daily facing intense criticism and today it's about the fact that he tweeted out earlier today. >> he is just not a decent human being. >> according to the white house, the reason president trump sent the tweets is the program's repeated harsh attacks against him. >> when he gets attacked, he's going to hit back. >> so deep in his psyche that you hit him, he punches you. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ain't no party like the party. ♪ it's a parking lot party ainsley: any excuse to have a party. steve: it's a party and the summer. it's the all-american summer concert series brought to you by our friends at care keurig. lee brice. be treated with barbecue. pete: ribs on the grill i. ainsley: fourth of july falls on a tuesday. so long weekend. pete: kicking the weekend off visually as well. steve: toba, wear the matlock music. i wear this seersucker suit. most comfortable suit.

susan rice, samantha, and john. tweeting quote the big story is the unmasking and surveillance of people that took place during the obama administration. fox news senior judicial analyst judge andrew napolitano joins me now and, you know, if there's something there, if, that's scary stuff. >> well, if there's something there, meaning unmasking, the revelation of a person whose communication has been captured by the intelligence community and used for political purposes, we have a very, very serious threat to the republic. so unmasking is only illegal if it's done for the wrong purpose and given to the wrong people. so if susan rice needs to know with whom citizen x is speaking in russia, and she needs to know the name of that person, she's entitled to know it, as long as she uses it for intelligence purposes. but if she uses it for political purposes, or she is unmasking citizen x talking to citizen x and has nothing to do with national security, then we have a very, very serious threat to the integrity of the republic. trish: do you believe that's what's actually going on here? r

huckabee will join us to weigh in on susan rice and the subpoenas on there russian prob. and the latest with sara carter and john solomon. uh- i- [sound of wrench] [intricate guitar riff] [engine starts] [guitar continues] this scarf all that's my left to rememb... sayonara. what. she washed this like a month ago! the long lasting scent of gain. now available in matching scents across your entire laundry routine. ♪ ♪you are loved ♪ ♪ ♪ >> sean: welcome back to "hannity." the left in america is completely unhinged. they are obsessed with pushing bizarre, unhinged conspiracy theories about president trumpnh that are absolutely insane and not based on fact or reality. we are talking about hillary clinton who has been the leading voice of the tinfoil hat crackpots for decades. the number one in america conspiracy theorist -- hillary clinton. that is tonight's mini monologue. blaming anyone and everyone for her political failures. she's constantly making bizarre excuses for the 2016 election loss. let's go back to the 1990s. her husband, bill clinton, embroiled in scandal an

inauguration. >> the national security adviser susan rice will testify under oath about russian actions, and campaigns that she unmasked the names and contact with russian officials. the think about these unmasking's. they communicated with foreign officials and expected to appear before the house news for their august recess. speaking of susan rice, she was caught in another lie. remember when she said this? >> we did blow the whistle on october 7th and that came as soon as the intelligence community, 17 agencies, came to a consensus was involved as an effort to play in the electoral process. rob: the new york times issuing a correction about their fake news claim that all 17 us intelligence agencies agreed the russians did hack the 2016 election, these are big stories that are being taken back and retracted. this is hundreds of journalists walking out in protest. and in an effort to save money. >> two police officers fighting for their lives after a traffic stop turned into a gunfight. >> immediately coming under fire. the officers able to fight back killing one suspect taken into cus

. what they're targeting are unmask requests related to john brennan, samantha power, and susan rice. again, this is a very political issue. this is an issue that republicans are facing a lot of concerns about. the white house has raised a lot of concerns about. i can't undercore enough, there is a split here between what the chairman is doing on the unmasking issue that is separate from what that investigation is supposed to be directed at. >> phil, thanks very much. jim sciutto, thanks to you as well. let's get the latest on the russia investigation. from the ranking democrat of the house intelligence committee, california congressman adam schiff is joining us now live from los angeles. congressman, thanks very much for joining us. >> thanks, wolf. good to be with you. >> we have a lot to discuss. first let me get your reaction. we've been reporting investigators are looking into whether the attorney general jeff sessions had a private meeting with the russian ambassador during the campaign that had not been disclosed. two u.s. senators have written letters asking for an investigation of

documents in the obama administration and the unmasking scandal, titled obama, and is he, susan rice has unmasking material is at obama library, or to explain, tom fenton, sarah carter, fox news anchor, explaining how she gets access to unmasking in the first place? how did she get to that level? >> i'm sure that mueller is investigating it, right, sean? so we the national security council which advises the president on national security matters, about the involvement in the unmasking about the dnc hacking, russia collusion, everything you think you would want from susan rice's files over at the national security council, and we got a letter back from the national security council saying all documents from the obama administration have been turned over to the presidential library, and they helpfully gave us the address of the library. >> sean: really? you want to go over, mr. obama, can i please has -- have those? >> now we can get the records for the presidential library, under the presidential records act, the freedom of information act which is what we typically use to get documents,

she lost the election. mike huckabee, susan rice talke latest with sara carter and john solomon. "burn." is that what the kids are saying now? i'm so bored, i'm dead. you can always compare rates on progressive.com. oh, that's nice, dear. but could you compare camping trips? because this one would win. all i want to do is enjoy nature and peace and quiet! it's not about winning. it's about helping people find a great rate even if it's not with progressive. -ugh. insurance. -when i said "peace and quiet," did you hear, "talk more and disappoint me"? ♪ do do do do ♪ skiddly do do ♪ camping with the family ♪ [ flame whooshes ] as after a dvt blood clot,ital i sure had a lot to think about. what about the people i care about? ...including this little girl. and what if this happened again? i was given warfarin in the hospital, but wondered, was this the best treatment for me? so i asked my doctor. and he recommended eliquis. eliquis treats dvt and pe blood clots and reduces the risk of them happening again. yes, eliquis treats dvt and pe blood clots. eliquis also had signific

, ben. good to see you. >> thank you for much. speak: >> martha: susan rice nol testify on her role in the unmasking of american citizens. we will read that breaking news in a moment. also, the battle rages on as lawmakers raised against the clock to recess. could we have a new plan from the senate? what will it look like and can it happen tomorrow? a completely different type of battle breaking out on twitter between president trump and an msnbc anchor. we just reference to this, we are going to dig into the back story. what happened on the other side that prompted the reaction? when we come back. >> the president can go too far with this tweet, it's a deeply personal insult. and choose what's right for you. woah. flo and jamie here to see hqx. flo and jamie request entry. slovakia. triceratops. tapioca. racquetball. staccato. me llamo jamie. pumpernickel. pudding. employee: hey, guys! home quote explorer. it's home insurance made easy. password was "hey guys." iti love hanging out.ade easy. with my friends. i have a great fit with my dentures. i love kiwis. i've always had that issue

reason we're showing you these faces, susan rice, john brennan and samantha power is because what the subpoenas are essentially asking the national security agencies for are any requests involving these three obama administration officials to unmask the names of potential trump associates or the president himself in communications that was gathered as part of intelligence. this is something nunez is freelancing. democrats are frustratied he di this but he still has the power of the subpoena pen. >> i want to get my panel to weigh in. nunez freelancing and the president, we mentioned earlier, tweeting to say, focus on these subpoenas. this unmasking. is this dangerous territory, whether for nunez or the president? at the end of the day, samantha powers, clapper, susan rice, they could come up with nothing. the group of people being subpoenaed have far more checkered histories, one could argue. michael flynn, michael cohen. they're not peers of samantha power. >> well, they're totally different parties, first of all. >> yes. >> i don't want to pay you $2, so it is unprecedented we have

documentation regarding susan rice, the former national security advisor of the obama administration and john brennan, the c.i.a. director. what is surprising is the request for information regarding samantha powers. she was the united nations ambassador and served as a foreign policy advisor to then senator barack obama in his senate office before joining the administration. it's pretty clear that the house intelligence committee or factions there believe she had much greater involvement than previously suggested in the unmasking investigation. and that she actually had a greater involvement than did either susan rice or john brennan. those subpoenas among seven that were issued by the intelligence chairman. two issued by the ranking member adam schiff. those subpoenas are seeking information about michael flynn and michael kohn. president trump's long time personal attorney in the trump organization. kohn said he he would work with the attorneys to follow the subpoena. >> shannon: so what do we expect to hear from the president on the paris climate deal this afternoo

. >> interview with susan rice has raised some new questions. >> she strongly suggests her race and gender played a role in the heat she faced dating back to benghazi. >> if anything cnn is getting worse by the day. >> people hate the media. they hated jim acosta going bananas at the press conference because the big mean press secretary won't let turn camera on him. >> i'm in favor of placing jim acosta with elmo at the white house press conference ♪ ♪ ♪ it's america. steve: welcome to america's number one cable news show up here on the mezzanine level studio f. en. ainsley: joel. hi. we talk about joel. there he is. also on our couch this morning anthony scar scaramucci. you decided to come to us and not cnn. >> i had a lot of choices. ainsley: first time he has talked since the story was retracted. brian: good news is president promised jobs and you are a witness that you finally have a job since you sold your company. steve: this is great news. >> could have gotten bureau of labor. good thing. brian: finally off the doll. >> thank god. steve: talk about your new job in just

, former national security advisor susan rice. you may remember allegedly requested names of trump associates. it appeared in coded classified intelligence reports to be unmasked. she denies any wrongdoing. also former cia director john brennan who testified last week and decried the leaks of classified information. and perhaps most noteworthy is the subpoenas naming of samantha power. president obama's former unn ambassador that has not been previously surfaced in the unmasking controversy. that's new. now her naming may explain an exchange from brennan's hearing last week that he had with congressman trey gowdy. >> do you recall any u.s. ambassadors asking that names be unmavericked? >> i don't. i don't know. maybe it's ring ago vegas bell but i'm not -- i could not answer with any confidence. >> well, we may learn more about that. the intelligence committee, the chairman devin nunes and ranking member adam schiff subpoenas from the intelligence committee we have seen. that is of former national security advisor michael flynn and michael cohen. president trump's long time attorne

officials including white house national security susan rice and former cia director john brennan. the very latest on the investigation this morning. fired followed her photo mask of trump. continued outrage coming up this morning. new tacking concerns for retailer. sears warning customers that their credit card numbers may have been compromised. changes may be in store for aetna, why the insurance company is considering locating headquarters. marketsmarkets are mixed today. futures indicating higher opening. nasdaq up 12 points. first look at job's number leading up to tomorrow government report. expectations call for 185 private sect or jobs to have been added to the economy last month. in europe stocks are higher across the board. cac quarante is best performer. in asia overnight. mixed performances, best performer was japan, nikkei average up better than 1%. all the stories this hour, hillary clinton still playing the blame game during interview yesterday, the former presidential candidate try today brush off e-mail scandal, again, she pointed to the media coverage for her loss in the e

the russian thing is going to hurt them. it's going to backfire. susan rice, john brennan, samantha power. what was she doing submitting unmasking requests? there's paperwork for each unmasking request. under oath, they are going to be asked why they did that. if they plead the fifth, or they perjure themselves or give some sort of partisan reason or disseminating classified information -- you have a full-blown political spying scandal on our hands. that's a big deal. >> juan: a political scandal if they were using it for political purposes. their country point of view is oh, then they find out why? it could be that that implicates some of trump's associates. >> dana: the hard thing about talking about this every night is that there is a fact-finding mission underway and i would like to let that fact finding mission continue. what are the procedures for unmasking, where they properly followed? what were the reasons why and let's get answers to all of it. i do think the nunes thing is bizarre. if you say you are taking a step back but then you are issuing subpoenas without talking to

has sent subpoenas to three intelligence agencies, explicitly naming obama officials, susan rice, samantha power and john brennan. here is the issue, the use of secret information by the obama team to undermine donald trump's candidacy. president trump has tweeted about this. look at this, the big story is the unmasking and surveillance of people that took place during the obama administration. there you go. all rise, napitano is here. the implication is, let's see if i'm right on this, the obama team did spy on donald trump. >> and used the raw intelligence material its spies gathered for political purposes. a very, very, very serious threat to personal liberty and to the stability of the republic, that the american government would use the authority we have given it to spy on us for its own petty purposes. do you remember a couple of months ago when devon nunez ran from the office to the white house with secret material. i believe he had received from three nsa agents, information about this unmasking and when he saw who was doing the unmasking, and when he saw who was unmasked, he felt

? >> yeah, i think we do, jim. sources are telling us tonight that behind closed doors, susan rice has agreed to testify before the house. they have targeted her believing she was involved in so-called unmasking of the identity. in intelligence reports she has denied she has done anything wrong, but she has agreed to testify, jim. and that's going to happen as the committee plans to interview a number of witnesses next month. >> thanks very much. manu raju on the bill. >> out front, the ranking member of the hout intelligence committee, congressman, thanks for taking the time tonight. >> thanks, jim. >> we noticed whachs a strong bipartisan statement from the europeans today saying that the white house response to the question on any potential comey tapes in the words of the statement stopped short of clarifying. i thought this was key, too, threatening compulsory action if your committee doesn't get the answers it wants. are you saying that if you don't get confirmation, you are prepared to subpoena the white house on this question? >> you know, our practice has been we always seek vo

they're specifically seeking information about any unmasking requests from john brennan, from susan rice, and from samantha powers, three obama administration officials. the question here right now is were any of these unmasking requests, which are essentially unredacting names in classified intelligence reports, done for political purposes? obama administration officials have said absolutely not. devin nunes clearly thinks this is still an issue. so while the russia investigation doesn't technically involve him, there's another track, the devin nunes track, and that involves unmasking. >> that certainly includes him. the devin nunes track includes devin nunes and he's making himself heard loudly and clearly. phil mattingly, thank you. rick santorum is a former republican senator from pennsylvania and cnn political commentator. brian fallon's here, cnn political commentator. and page pate, legal attorney and analyst. i want to talk about executive privilege. "the new york times" questioned whether james comey will be allowed to testify, saying the president could try to invoke executive privi

former obama administration officials. susan rice, john brennan, and samantha power. president trump tweeted today... they were also subpoenaed that had to do with the russian investigation but the surprise is these four and coming from devon nunez who i thought has taken a step back. >> kimberly: i think this is a huge story. i'm not sure why it hasn't gotten more coverage. i think it's very significant and should grab the attention of all americans in terms of a privacy grab and surveillance. one of the basic things that we hold near to our hearts and deer in this country. we fought for our liberty, our freedoms, our privacy rights. i think it's important they conduct the investigation and really get to the bottom of this. it can be swept away with an inordinate amount of focus. >> juan: what you think, you have jim call me saying his testimony will come next thursday. you have this ongoing effort, it looks like this is the big story, jesse... >> jesse: i think democrats are going to regret these investigations because i think the russian thing is going to hurt them. it's going to

similar threat in the russian investigation. susan rice, under president obama, will, indeed, testify in front of the house intelligence committee. the back story to this, the top ranking republican went after her bringing claims. she's going to talk. what else do you know? >> initially, she refused to appear in front of the committee. now she is going to appear, it's going to be a closed door session. she probably will talk about what she learned. a lot is classified information. she'll go into detail about what she knew about michael flynn. but, what we don't know is if she was actually involved in it or if there was any need to unmask michael flynn's information and the intelligence that they have learned. this has been the focus of the republicans on the hill, certainly on the house side. they have been very interested in this unmasking and who released and who revealed michael flynn's name. keep in mind, we believe that the investigation may not have needed for his name to be unmasked because the way the u.s. government learned of his name may not have required that. >>

-pro camera. susan rice and the blame game over the unmasking of twrum officials. we'll take up her unbelievable answers and excused. we are coming right back. today, we're out here with some big news about type 2 diabetes. you have type 2 diabetes, right? yes. so let me ask you this... how does diabetes affect your heart? it doesn't, does it? actually, it does. type 2 diabetes can make you twice as likely to die from a cardiovascular event, like a heart attack or stroke. and with heart disease, your risk is even higher. you didn't know that. no. yeah. but, wait, there's good news for adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease. jardiance is the only type 2 diabetes pill with a lifesaving cardiovascular benefit. jardiance is proven to both significantly reduce the chance of dying from a cardiovascular event in adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease and lower your a1c. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration. this may cause you to feel dizzy, faint, or lightheaded, or weak upon standing. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal.

foreign officials. former national security adviser susan rice, former u.n. ambassador samantha power and john brennan all named in the subpoenas. a senior aide claims nunez was acting privately from the russia investigation and his aides stress nunez never entirely recused himself but only temporarily stepped aside. >> can this investigation continue as you as chairman. >> why would it not? >> reporter: in april nunez announced he was temporarily putting congressman mike conway in charge of the russia probe. nunez faced a firestorm of criticism about how he handled classified materials when he obtained documents during a secret white house meeting without telling democrats on his own committee. >> i have seen intelligence reports that clearly show that the president elect and his team were, i guess, at least monitored. >> i don't agree with the chairman's characterization. >> reporter: last month cnn learned nunez was still reviewing information related to the russian investigation. also in a private committee meeting there were republicans who were stressing that nunez still had sub

dreck of the cia, susan rice, former national security adviser and samantha power. first of all obviously run and could as part of the intelligence community could unmasked names. that was part of his remix. susan rice is somewhat stranger because usually the national security advisor doesn't get involved at that level. the samantha power, totally unheard of. although she may be considered in some formal sense a part of the intelligence community. >> who knows. i think there is examination. maria: we will examine in the weeks to come. the thursday testimony will be important. michael mukasey, great to see you. thank you for your insights as always. getting back to live, do we know about the attackers. the man who oversaw the response to the boston marathon attack as they look ahead right now on "sunday morning futures." maria: welcome back. now more aftermath of the london attacks that investigators trying to figure out whether the man behind last night of the terror attack had in the help. to do right now is daniel lansky, the former superintendent in chief for the boston polic

trio of former obama administration officials, national security adviser susan rice, former cia director john brennan and former u.s. embassador to the united nations samantha power. we are bag with dan henninger, kim stossel and board member rigo. how significant is this in -- >> the only crimes that have been committed have been the leaking of classified information to deal with mr. flynn and others and what was notable about the subpoenas this week is that we have a new name of somebody who unmasked a trump official, we don't know who yet, which trump official. paul: are we sure samantha power unmasked? do we know that for sure? >> he would not be sending unless she hadn't done it. it's a very strong bet that that is indeed the case. paul: she has not commented on this, has she? >> not so far. we don't know. but we have had susan rice all but confirmed that she did, indeed, unmask trump officials and mr. brennan too. so it'll be interesting to see what she has to say because it's very difficult to come up with a good reason for why the former embassador to the united nations

, the more it drags in susan rice and loretta lynch and eventually, the president -- at some point, the democrats are going to say, look, it is fine for you to do your ratings but can we please have more elmo and less pressure? this is going to kill us with loretta lynch and susan rice and all the rest. their interests are not aligned on this topic. >> tucker: what do they do at that point? to they go back to finding a new murder trial to cover? what is the next ways for them? >> i think the trouble when you go down this thing -- it's like, we used to have these things long before television. 80 years ago, when there where supposedly be a 5-year-old boy trapped in a well, and the media would camp out around the well to wait for the little boy to be rescued, and that was dramatic in a sob story way. but if there is no little 7-year-old in the well, if there actually is nothing there, then, all you have done in the long run, i think, is destroyed yourself. you go back to that malaysian jet thing, they actually are, in this case, they are -- do you remember on cnn when they thought th

video, all the while using his go-no camera. i mention -- his go-pro camera. susan rice and the blame game over the unmasking of twrum officials. we'll take up her unbelievable answers and excused. we are coming right backckckckck [ indistinct chatter ] [ intense music playing ] it's here, but it's going by fast. the opportunity of the year is back: the mercedes-benz summer event. get to your dealer today for incredible once-a-season offers, and start firing up those grilles. lease the gle350 for $579 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. you're searching for something. like the perfect deal... ...on the perfect hotel. so wouldn't it be perfect if there was a single site where you could find the right hotel for you at the best price? there is. because tripadvisor now compares prices from over 200 booking sites... ...to save you up to 30%... ...on the hotel you want. trust this bird's words. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. lou: susan rice playing the race and gender cards. claiming she has been the victim of racism and

, all the while using his go-no camera. i mention -- his go-pro camera. susan rice and the blame game over the unmasking of twrum officials. we'll take up her unbelievable answers and excused. answers and excused. we are coming right backckckckck before i had the shooting, answers and excused. we are coming right backckckckck burning of diabetic nerve pain these feet... liked to style my dog as a kid... and were pumped to open my own salon. but i couldn't bear my diabetic nerve pain any longer. so i talked to my doctor and she prescribed lyrica. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions, suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worse depression, unusual changes in mood or behavior, swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling or blurry vision. common side effects: dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain, swelling of hands, legs, and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who have had a drug or alcohol problem may be more

being captured. i just don't want it to be used for political purposes. if susan rice and u.n. ambassador warned fact making a request of the elegance community that i want to listen to lindsey graham's conversation with the foreign person, that bothers me simply because i'm in a different branch of government. what national security value comes from having someone like susan rice be able to listen into conversations with the lyrical opponents and foreign leaders. pat to me would be be a great abuse of intelligence gathering. the question is did the obama industry should politicize intelligence? we won't know until we find out who made a request from asking how many americans were surveilled. on the 15th demo collections. how many were members of congress, how many requests in their conversations. >> we will see. good to see you, senator. >> more developing from london this hour. scott yards this afternoon is a major concert is about to begin in manchester. how do you keep this event safe today? we are their life in a moment. bill: fox news alert. what we are learning about ar

power and susan rice had access to unmasked americans' intelligence, the next obvious question is did they brief the president? did the president benefit from that? i'm certain as the summer winds on, we're going to get questions like that, and hopefully, a few answers. lou: and upcoming as well is the interrogation, if you will -- [laughter] the testimony of the former director of the fbi. >> sure. lou: i want to get your sense of that, because it seems to me that as one looks at the record of director comey amongst the first questions that should be asked by the panel is how is it you did not bring scandal after scandal after scandal to resolution and left open files and open cases that look for all the world like political, if you will, subterfuge rather than investigative success? >> june 8th is going to be a very big day for james comey to come back to the hill and testify before the senate. and i think it's going to be a little bit, i think it could be comey versus comey, which i think some of the words he uttered previously are going to be contrasted with what he utters tha

. >> sandra: susan rice will testify under oath about allegations she took part in the unmasking of americans named in until reports. specifically, the identities of trump associates caught up in those foreign until reports during the election. she's been under fire for her alleged role, but insists she did nothing wrong. >> charles: i think it's great news and a great first step. a lot of people said this will not be seen by the public. we remember the last eight years where a lot of folks who were involved in the obama and administration were called into human public hearings and it's the same for the process. we never got answers or resolution. people have given up on this process, but it's a big step in the right direction. >> meghan: i guess, but much like huma abedin and eric holder, i don't anticipate that any ramifications for her actions, if she even did in fact unmask people illegally, though she did say i leave nothing to nobody. it is hard for the average american to believe it. some of these people who work, it doesn't matter how politicized you are. you will get away w

foreign officials. former national security advisor susan rice, samantha power and former cia director john brennan all named in the subpoenas. a senior aid claims nunes was acting separately and he only recused himself. >> can this investigation continue? >> why would it not? >> in april nunes announced he was temporarily putting mike conway in charge of the russian probe. he faced a firestorm of criticism about how he handled classified materials when he obtained documents in a secret white house meeting. >> i have seen intelligence reports that clearly show that the president-elect and his team were, i guess, at least monitored. >> i don't agree with the chairman's characterization. >> the house rules state the chairman can issue subpoenas if he consults with the democrats. it is clear that did not happen in some cases. also this morning the president now weighing in on this debate over what this committee should be looking at. the president tweeting just within the last hour saying the big story is the unmasking and surveillance of people that took place during the obama administra