labour criticised the move as a sticking plaster. let's talk to our education correspondent, julianne hargreaves. where will this be spent? we have some detailfrom the where will this be spent? we have some detail from the department for education. i want to alter something we have just education. i want to alter something we havejust said. 1.3 billion from next year, 2017 — 18. another 1.3 billion for the following year. in total 2.6 billion. year on year, a big injection of extra cash raided from civil servants in whitehall, the free schools programme, diverted back to the chalkface in classrooms. not new money from the treasury, it is from within the existing education budget. labour has said this is not new money. conservative ma nifesto this is not new money. conservative manifesto commitment in the general election they would put more money into schools. we knew it was coming, it has been made today, it will have a real impact. teachers are saying from the south—east of england to the north—west of england they are seeing

when did the labour party introduce national living wage? never believes that the conservative government. >> the minimum wage with opposition from the conservative party. wages are lower than they were ten years ago and the prime minister has been in office for just one year, during that time disposable income has fallen by 2%. the economic consequences of austerity are very clear and so are the social consequences. life expectancy stalling for the first time in 100 years. today, the iss forecast income any quality is going to get worse and child poverty will rise to 5,000,000 x 2022. does the -- >> order! members are shouting, shouting excessively. they must calm themselves, take some sort of soothing medicine. >> i will try to help the honorable member. that is the prime minister not realize that her talk of a strong economy doesn't remotely match the reality that millions of people face with low wages and poverty? >> the right honorable gentlemen is wrong in some of the fact he is putting forward. inequality is down, life expectancy is c

i wonder whether more young people voted labour because of what they thought labour stood for in terms of brexit. overwhelmingly young people are against leading to the eu. he seemed to have a softer line but in this interview he confirmed stronger than before that he fear was prime minister he would leave the single market and his policy on brexit is not that different to the government and wonder if that is not a bigger betrayal to young people. and wonder if that is not a bigger betrayal to young peoplelj and wonder if that is not a bigger betrayalto young people. i imagine the student debt thing really was the student debt thing really was the turning point to young people supporting jeremy corbyn. likely from me, i got through university before the feast kamin and i rightly the person they should despise and resent but i am on their side. i think the 9000 pounds is too much. interest rates at teeny tiny and 70% of stu d e nts interest rates at teeny tiny and 70% of students will not pay off their debt. it seems like an enormous waste of time and energy in order to make people mise

and labour's way means everyone pays the price of labour. [shouting] >> mr. speaker, when tories talk of tough choices we know who suffers, it's the poorest and most vulnerable in our society. young people employed on zero hours of contracts are more likely to have worse mental and physical health. students who have worked hard at university graduating with the 7000 pounds worth of debt that will stay with them until they retire. mr. speaker, let me spell it out to the prime minister. this is the only country in which wages have not recovered and the global financial crash. more people are using food banks, 4 million children living in poverty, record in work poverty, young people who see no prospect of owning their own home, and 6 million earning less than the living wage. the lope epidemic is a threat to our economic stability. can she take some tough choices and instead of offering platitudes, offer some real help and real support for those in work, young people, who deserve better and deserve to be given more optimism, rather than greater inequality? >> w

one from labour's chuka umunna on brexit. and a third from another labour mp, stella creasy, on abortion rights for women from northern ireland. health is a devolved issue and women who travel from northern ireland to england for terminations currently have to pay for them. stella creasy‘s amendment — calling for an end had gathered cross—party support. and so it was on that, during a debate aboutjobs and the economy, that chancellor philip hammond announced the government would give way. my understanding is that my right honourable friend, the minister for women and equalities, is just about to make an announcement by way of a letter to members to intervene to provide finance for anyone coming from northern ireland. it's welcome that the government is looking to end this injustice, but the devil will be in the detail. could he make a commitment to meet with myself and other organisations organisations like maries stokes, to look at how we can turn this into a reality, so these women in northern ireland today will final

frankfurt is looking to labour law lockouts as it looks to attract post brexit banks. there is attract post brexit banks. there is a wonderful game at the moment, trying to attract banks from london to other european cities ahead of brexit. dublin has been quite successful. frankfurt has done reasonably well. it attracted three significant japanese banks but the labour laws are very different from the uk. the germans have come up with the concept of identifying so—called risktakers, effectively what you might call the traders in investment banks that they will change the rules of the bank wants to get rid of the risktakers, they could do it easily without applying german labour laws. they can change the laws —— the rules so easily, the banks will be concerned that once they have got them, they can change them. some of the american banks would say exactly that which is why they will not be rushing to frankfurt. those labour laws are one of the big issues for the banks with concerns of moving to france, it's difficult to dismiss people. concerns of moving to france

apparently labour are going to poseit edge. apparently labour are going to pose it — — edge. apparently labour are going to pose it —— oppose it why agreeing with the tory hard brexit to take us out of the single market and then freedom of movement. poor opposition has been offered by the labour party. in the meantime we will continue to look after scottish interests and fight for a place in the single market. i do also think it isa the single market. i do also think it is a great shame that he co nsta ntly it is a great shame that he constantly talks about wanting to stay in the single market, which he knows for a fact means not leaving the eu. in other words, for his colleagues, the scottish nationalists‘ own ends, they would seek to undermine the will of the united kingdom. that is totally undemocratic on this side of the house and i hope on the opposition benches, we will fulfil the will of the people. a short time later, the bill was formally put for parliament. well, a short time later the bill was formally put before parliament. second reading. what date? tomorro

you say when, not death, it must be great for labour. the optics are really good for labour. the conservatives were never going to keep the pay cap for ever, but it looks as if the reason it has been quick and is because of the pressured labour has been applying. it needs at the very bad when the conservatives voted to get rid of the amendment, they all cheered, and played into labour hand that conservatives don't care about public sector workers. jeremy corbyn was speaking yesterday. there seems to bea was speaking yesterday. there seems to be a mood changed towards austerity, not just from to be a mood changed towards austerity, notjust from the public, but from politicians. if you get back to david cameron when ed miliband was labour leader, you couldn't get through at pmq is without hearing about the five—year plan ora without hearing about the five—year plan or a need to cut the deficit. the conservatives have stopped using that argument. the death as you mentioned three times in the conservative manifesto. jeremy corbyn has been able to promise of the spending witho

labour want a different approach. in our manifesto, we are committed to leaving the state pension age at 66 while we undertake a review into healthy life expectancy, arduous work, and the potential of flexible state pension age. even by the standards of the party opposite, their approach to the state pension age is reckless, short—sighted and irresponsible. when the evidence in front of us shows that life expectancy will continue to increase a little over one year every eight years that pass, fixing the state pension age at 66 as advocated by the party opposite demonstrates a complete failure to appreciate the situation in front of us. in the snp, we continue to call for the establishment ofan independent savings and pensions commission. we believe that the government is not doing enough to recognise the demographic differences across the united kingdom and an independent review of this would look at those and would take those into account. when her majesty the queen came to the throne in 1952, there were 300 people

labour's way leads to fewer jobs, higher prices, more taxes, and labour's way means everyone pays the price of labor. speaker: jeremy corbyn. mr. corbyn: mr. speaker, when tories talk of tough choices, we know who suffers -- it's the poorest and most vulnerable in our society. [shouting] young people, mr. speaker, employed on zero hours contract, are more likely to have worse mental and physical health. students who have worked hard at university graduating with 57,000 pounds worth of debt that will stay with them till they retire. mr. speaker, let me spell it out to the prime minister. this is the only country in which wages have not recovered since the global financial crash. more people are using food banks. 4 million children living in poverty. record in work poverty, young people who see no prospect of owning their own home, and 6 million earning less than the living wage. the low pay epidemic is a threat to our economic stability. can she take some tough choices and instead of offering platitudes, offer some real help and real support for those in work, young people, who deserve

you know, cos without the labour, 75,000 seasonal staff employed in horticulture, and without that labour we will not have a british horticultural industry. the government, aware of these concerns, may revitalise the seasonal agricultural workers scheme, which gave access to foreign labour without the right to live here. nearly four million people across the uk are employed in the food and drink sector, but derek feels it's unloved. he's seen headlines about sweet hot deals for the car industry or banking, and fears farming may be sold out. the whole future of our horticultural industry could be decided in a simple late—night meeting and it could be a trade—off against something else, you know, keeping financial services here. that is the most worrying thing for us. and if it goes the wrong way for them, g's fresh can still grow stuff — butjust not here. we've got overseas operations, we've got the capability to go and set farms up anywhere. but leaving the uk is not a decision you'd take lightly? i'm a british farmer through and through and, yeah, to suddenly stop farming here, mov

everything is up labour have suggested. everything is upforgrab, it labour have suggested. everything is up for grab, it seems like it. you know, there have been several interviews that show the result of the election mean the government is not the strongest position. people coming for money, maybe it leads to vote. we don't know which one could, theresa may, leave aside the brexit thing, which is already complicated, domestically this is is a whole host of issues in which every minister must be banging down the door asking for mormon. it shows the power of the youth vote in the election, which was, had never really been harnessed before, young voters registering and voting labour. what was fascinating in the eu referendum only 40% of 18—25—year—olds voted. in the last election, a couple of weeks ago it was 70%, and people like my daughters and their generation were getting out the vote. they are calling themselves generation vote, social media was important. labour did lots of funny memes and pictures they were putting o memes and pictures they were putting oto memes

yes, this is a labour analysis of the figures. they showed teachers in state schools have had i'io teachers in state schools have had no guaranteed training or safeguarding children, controlling a class or abduction —— of adapting teaching to different standards, a damning analysis. the article, aasmah, pointing to the decision to boost free schools. where perhaps you could have teachers who did not have the kind of qualifications that many people might expect. this was introduced by michael gove, who was education secretary. you said that you could use and qualified teachers and that has been expanded. these figures, state funded schools, clearly it is something that has been set expanded the state funded schools. having read the article, a unqualified teacher to me would suggest somebody who is not qualified academically, but we are not talking about that. we are talking about the other important stuff like the safeguarding children, which sounds like training courses perhaps that teachers need. not sure why, it sounds bizar

general election, and some mps in the labour party think they could win it. they are likely to not work with theresa may closely who they think as a wounded prime minister. if you talk to mps behind the scenes they don't say that they want to be in power because they think the next two years will be difficult. when it comes to back it yes, the problem there again the liberal democrats say that what is she suggesting when she talks about working together on brexit? can you really negotiate with her, speaking tojeremy corbyn all the time about what the position will be. again, doesn't seem particularly practical way of doing it. looking at our own cabinets, they don't seem to agree on a negotiating position, let alone across the house of commons, because the problem she has that if it comes to votes, we know that the repeal bill will be coming and published on thursday this week. there may not be any significant votes until later on in the autumn. the problem is that mps may choose that in order to get their own way on things. she is not in control, of the proc

labour's hands. there does seem to be a definite mood change towards austerity by the british public and politicians as well. yeah, if you look back to david cameron, when ed miliband was labour leader, you couldn't really get back through a pmqs 01’ any common session without hearing about the five—year plan or they need to cut the deficit. but the conservatives have really stopped using that argument. the deficit was only mentioned three times in the conservative manifesto. it has meant that corbyn has really been able to promise all the spending without being reminded of why it might not be such a good idea. now, lots of conservatives are really doubting themselves. they are looking at the election result and they are thinking all the previous need for fiscal discipline actually isn't popular and now they are second—guessing themselves. and i suppose for the tories, breaking down and undoing austerity is something of a vote winner. but is it too late for them? the conservatives pride themsel

migration on our labour market in the uk and that will inform government policy. government will set policy. the framework will be what the immigration system will be in the immigration bill in 2018. we don't want a cliff edge, we want business to grow and develop. you say that they will be no free movement of european workers after march, 2019 but the home secretary says there will be transition arrangements for to three years where european workers can come here and work. which is it? they are compatible, they go together perfectly well. when we leave the eu, by definition, freedom of movement will end. there will be a system, after march, 2019, which will be our new system and there will be a period of that, a transition system including a number of things, for example eu citizens looking to get settled status in the uk, who have qualified, after that negotiation. there will be a grace period of two years for them to deal with it. we will say to people coming to this country that they will potentially have to register so we know who is here. that isn't controll

if i'm honest, i've heard stories about quite a few labour mps who didn't think they we re labour mps who didn't think they were going to keep their seats, and ended up keeping them. when the result came through, it was a com plete result came through, it was a complete shock. a complete shock? when was that moment for you of realisation? it was when i heard the exit poll. to be honest with you, i didn't actually watch the exit poll myself. i have superstition about things like that. my husband watched it for me and came and told me. i was shocked at the result that came through in the exit poll. it took a few minutes for it to sink in, what that was telling me. my husband gave mea hug, that was telling me. my husband gave me a hug, and then i got on the phone to cchq, to the conservative party, to find out what had happened. that must've been a moment for philip to tell you that. it must have been quite hard for him? yes, was. but he's been a huge support for me over the years. there are times when i perhaps get in to read a newspaper article —— i perhaps get him to read a newspa

he attacked labour's public spending plans. if they had carried on spending at the rate they were when they left office, there would be an extra £1 trillion added to the public debt by the end of this parliament. and we saw their manifesto at the last general election wasjust spend, spend, spend other people's money with no credible plan to pay for it. and that way, i suggest, ms ryan, is not the route that our country should follow. and the fact that so few of them are here to defend their plans, i suspect, tells us everything we need to know. he turned to the spending demands facing ministers. there are many pressures on public spending. there is public sector pay, funding for our national health service, funding for social care, colleagues want more money put into schools, there are many, many pressures on public spending, and part of the challenge of being in government is that you cannot say yes to everybody, you have to make choices and you have to set priorities. would he also agree with me that our public services are

help me understand the opposition labour party's help me understand the opposition labour pa rty‘s position? help me understand the opposition labour party's position? it supports brexit happening so how it is justifying being this awkward? you are right. so labour agreed to help the government to start the brexit process triggering article 50, the official way that britain began its exit from the eu. but what this provides is the first real chance for labour and the other opposition parties to tinker with the government's vision for brexit. so it provides a platform really for labour to say we are going to get our version of brexit on to the stat toad books. if you take the charter of fundamental rights, the government saying it is not going to incorporate that charter into eu law, it will protect rights in other ways, labour are very clear on that, that that is a red line for them, they want that charrer into uk law, incorporated as it is now. and that is just incorporated as it is now. and that isjust one incorporated as it is now. and that is just one example, so what this is coming dow

shadow brexit secretary sir keir starmer set out labour's objections to the repeal bill. there is no problem with the idea of protecting the rights of citizens in the uk, there is a problem in the way the government intends to do it. it wants sweeping powers to make late changes by delegated legislation, which come late in the negotiations and are likely to be the most controversial. they have no mechanism for making sure that the rights that are being entrenched keep up with european standards, and on the question of devolved administrations they have the presumption the wrong way round, it should be that powers are dissolved —— devolved, not hoarded in whitehall. if the government cannot get this bill through, does that count as the equivalent of a confidence vote on the government, and the government collapses? we said, these are our concerns, we don't get second reading until at least september, so you can address those concerns. that is the first question, the ball is in their court, they know what the concerns are and we expect them to deal with them, and they h

those calls for cooperation were also seized on by labour's shadow defence secretary. she wondered if defence ministers would agree to a pay rise for members of the armed forces. after losing her majority at the general election the prime minister has now signalled that she is prepared to work across the house with other parties in areas of agreement. in that spirit i would like to make a constructive offer. the government has just introduced an armed forces bill in the other place. if they agree to amend that bill to include a real terms pay rise for our armed forces personnel then they can count on labour support. will the government agree to work with us to give our armed forces the pay award they deserve? we all want to see our armed forces being properly remunerated for the service that they give us. but it is also incumbent on the honourable lady to make it very clear how any increase that she is favouring would be properly paid for. and that is something she hasn't done, her party hasn't done, and they certainly didn't do it the last election. the pay review sys

this must be a great win for labour. yeah, the optics are really good for labour. even with the public sector pay cap, the conservatives were never going to keep this forever. but it looks like this is... the reason this has been hastened or quickend is because of labour and the pressure they're putting on it. and we saw with the amendment they put in this week to the queen's speech on the public sector pay cap, it really put the pressure up. it made it look very bad when the conservatives did vote to get rid of the amendment, they all cheered. that wasn't a good look and it really plays into labour's hands and suggested the conservatives don't care about public sector workers. we saneremy corbyn yesterday at the anti—austerity march. he was speaking. there does seem to be a definite mood change towards austerity, not only by the british public but also by politicians as well. yeah, if you look back to david cameron, when ed miliband was labour leader, you couldn't really get back through a pmqs oi’ any common session without hearing about the five—year plan

much of the economy, it is casual labour and in the same way that airbnb does not own a hotel rooms, and facebook does not own the media. a lot of noise made about this because it this is £1 billion valuation potentially but if you look at the amount of money that has gone into these business, you could be one during what is going on. $275 million raised last year they are about to raise a similar sum and the evaluation stems from how much money you have had put into the business so you have had put into the business soldo you have had put into the business so i do not think that is particularly exciting. evaluation at this stage, and i have had experience, the evaluation hung like a stone around may next. -- my neck. just yes or no, can andy murray when? i think you will get through the match today which is one round further than queens but i think it is unlikely that he will win. you heard it first on the bbc. that's it from us. have a great day. hello. the weekend was something of a mixed bag across the greater part of scotland and northern ireland, but once we get into england a

the snp and labour were equally upset. perhaps unfavourably, this parliament has already been dubbed the zombie parliament. i actually think that this comparison would actually give the flesh—eating undead a bad name. this is turbo—charged political zombie—ism. but it's a curious type of zombie—ism, mr speaker, cos if you look at them, not only are they tearing the flesh from the public, but they are starting to consume themselves. if you look around whitehall just now, what passes for discourse, normal discourse, amongst secretaries of state and whitehall departmentsm is briefing and counter briefing. and this is what happens, leader of the house, when you do nothing — bad stuff happens. this is a government at war with itself. the government said many important debates had already taken place. last week, we had a vital debate on the grenfell inquiry. many powerful points were raised from members on all sides of the house, and it's right that we have prioritised giving time to such a catastrophic and tragic even

but the former labour prime minister has suggested political change in france has opened the path to compromise. tony blair claims the eu could be willing to make concessions on the free movement of people, to allow the uk to stay in a reformed eu. britain benefits enormously from that freedom of movement. however, the question is whether there are changes, qualifications to it, not alteration of the indivisibility of the principle, but qualifications to it around the things that concern people. but those claims directly contradict what those in brussels are saying, that the uk must accept free movement, without exception or nuance. i'm not going to disclose conversations i had within europe, but i'm not saying this simply on the basis of a whim. some of those who campaigned to leave the eu says there is no evidence to back up mr blair's claim. the eu itself has made it absolutely clear that the four freedoms, including freedom of movement, are indivisible, as they've called it. the chief negotiator, barnier, has said that. they took four minutes to agree those guidelines. there is n

but there's no way, as it stands, that labour will back the bill. we will make sure there is full parliamentary scrutiny, that has to be key to it. we have a parliament where the government does not have a majority, we have a country that has voted in two ways, on leave and remain. obviously the majority voted to leave, we respect that. but they didn't vote to lose jobs, they didn't vote to have parliament ridden roughshod over. nor will the scottish government. nicola sturgeon with her own kodak moment in brussels today too. the scottish parliament can't technically veto the plan, but it can refuse willing consent. as the bill stands just now, in good conscience i could not recommend to the scottish parliament that it gives legislative consent to this bill. this bill takes powers away from the scottish parliament and undermines the very foundations of the devolution settlement that that parliament is built on. as whitehall begins this enormous process, ministers are all too well aware that there will be conflict ahead. the question, how they balanc

labour thought it was a missed opportunity. in the words of the general secretary of unite, the biggest union in the uk, instead of the serious programme the country urgently needs to ensure that once again work pays in this country, we got a depressing sense that insecurity is the inevitable new norm. the wage increases we have seen in the last year have been at their highest amongst the lowest paid, thanks to the national living wage. today's response to the taylor review from the government tells us everything we need to know about their frailty and their approach to workers' rights. a weak set of proposals that will probably not be implemented, a set of talking points that leaves the balance of power with employers and big business. the king of spain came to westminster as part of his state visit to the uk. as we heard earlier, theresa may missed prime minister's questions to take part in the day's events. she and jeremy corbyn were part of the audience when the king addressed both houses of parliament in the lords royal ga

and there was this debate in which many labour collea g u es this debate in which many labour colleagues put forward very strong and very good arguments about why there is a special deal needed for there is a special deal needed for the women. and you know what the tory minister replied? it is quite important that these women understand the need to go back into thejobs understand the need to go back into the jobs market, we understand the need to go back into thejobs market, we can offer them apprenticeships. what kind of insult to humanity is that? what kind of co nte m pt to humanity is that? what kind of contempt is that for women who have worked very hard all their lives, paid into the system that they might get... paid into the system that they might get. . . that paid into the system that they might get... that is jeremy corbyn speaking in durham. let's take you straight back to hamburg now where we're expecting a news conference with the leaders of the g20. the overview of the results of the summit, i told you before the summit that the preconditions for the success that the preco

labour received a fair amount of support as a result of... and tapped into, frankly, feeling among many people but they had suffered long enough and that public sector workers deserve a pay rise above 1% per year, which is below inflation so per year, which is below inflation so many people get a pay cut year by year. as you would expect, labour seizing on the current infighting between cabinet meetings and we had john mcdonnell saying this morning, outlining again labour's policy to give public sector workers a pay rise equal to 1% and possibly more but he was pushed on the details of how labour would fund a pay rise above inflation for public sector workers. we'll end the pay cap. we've set aside £4 billion annually to make that happen. we've looked at the 0br forecasting about how pay will rise and it will certainly match inflation. and some review bodies — because it will be set by review bodies — will try to compensate for the losses of the last 7 years. we're very clear, unlike to government, which has set a pay cap the review bodi

we had the labour shadow chancellorjohn mcdonnell saying this morning, outlining, again labour's policy to give public sector workers a pay rise equal to 1% and possibly more. he was passed on the detail of how labour would fund a pay rise above inflation for public sector workers. we will end a pay cut. we have made that clear. we have set aside 4 billion on an annual basis to enable it happen. we have looked at the office for budget responsibility forecasts on helping will rise and it will certainly much inflation, and some review bodies will try and compensate the sum of losses of the la st compensate the sum of losses of the last seven years. again, we're very clear, unlike the government which set a cap the review bodies have to follow, it will be up to those bodies to make recommendations that we will did too. that is the policy issue, what about the personality issue, what about the personality issue philip hammond has spoken openly about people out to get in. that is right. we're seeing a briefing war, really, most cabinet ministers over the last few weeks. the chancellor has pu

this was set up by those involved injeremy corbyn‘s labour campaigns, it suggested 50 labour mp should bejoining the liberals. some of those names included those who nominated jeremy corbyn for the leadership. the liverpool mp, basically the left in her local party took control and one of them suggested she ought to publicly reca nt suggested she ought to publicly recant criticism jeremy corbyn, apologised to him for disloyalty. attem pts apologised to him for disloyalty. atte m pts to apologised to him for disloyalty. attempts to try to defuse the row but i think she is genuinely concerned about what might happen to her. i don't expect to see some kind of mass purge of labour mps. what is going on beneath the surface is an attempt to change the rules to try to move the party permanently to the left. at this year's party conference, there will be an attempt to change the leadership rules to make it easier forjeremy corbyn to hand over to another left—wing successor. some things will be debated this year. something is not until next year. that will include making it easier to unseat s

on wednesday's daily politics the labour mp today. on wednesday's daily politics the labourmp came today. on wednesday's daily politics the labour mp came to discuss the scale of personal abuse directed at politicians. i think it's been getting worse, i don't get that much xxx. it comes overwhelmingly from the right, but it does not matter where it comes from it is unacceptable and anyone who practices that is wrong. i think you had not use abusive language is. and sometimes it is appropriate. ifeel very language is. and sometimes it is appropriate. i feel very strongly. understand but don't use it again. in that live discussed in they were unable to bleep out the ten used by the mp which led to this response from mr thomas. i do not want to be sitting here with my grandchildren listening to people come out of disgusting language. there are little children about at this time of the day. another political interview cause more controversy this week, conducted by emma barnett on radio five live she asked the prime minister how she reacte

s but he is also against the labour party's somewhat but he is also against the labour pa rty‘s somewhat ambivalent but he is also against the labour party's somewhat ambivalent stance on brexit. within that labour should be backing the remain argument. he says if brexit is a terrible catastrophe, the costjobs later on, labour will also be blamed for not making the case for remain. that is what he is warning. thank you very much. laws on buying and carrying acid are to be reviewed by the government following a spate of attacks which took place in london on thursday night. five people had corrosive liquid thrown at them, including one man who is said to have suffered life—changing injuries. two teenage boys, aged 15 and 16, remain in custody on suspicion of robbery and grievous bodily harm with intent. andy moore's report contains flashing images and some scenes you may find distressing. where's it hurt, mate — your eyes? in the aftermath of the first attack, police doused the victim with water. he was protected by his helmet, and lucky to escape with only minor injuries. but even so,

on wednesday's daily politics the labour mp jack drew today. on wednesday's daily politics the labour mpjack drew me came to discuss the scale of personal abuse directed at politicians. it has been getting worse for some years, and i personally don't get that much, if you will excuse the language, but it comes overwhelmingly from the right, but that doesn't matter where it comes from, it is not acceptable and anyone who practices that is com pletely anyone who practices that is completely wrong. when we're talking about abuse it would be best if we did not use abusive language and daytime —— and daytime terrorism. did not use abusive language and daytime —— and daytime terrorismlj feel daytime —— and daytime terrorism.” feel —— on daytime television. i feel —— on daytime television. i feel very strongly about it. the daily politics team were not able to lead out the term as we have done and that led to this response.” don't want to sit and hear people coming out with disgusting language like that, i'm amazed you allow pe

the debate was initiated by the labour mp albert 0wen. this debate is about getting it right and keeping the uk as a world leader, in civil nuclear, in research and development. we have achieved the status of world leader by cooperation with working with others across the world, but under the umbrella of euratom. i put it to the government that there are ways forward without having to have a cliff edge when article 50 negotiations are complete. my concern is the impact of this on medicine. is he aware of the concerns of the royal college of radiologists that a lack of being able to bring isotopes easily into this country could affect 500,000 scans and 10,000 cancer treatments? these things cannot be stored because they have a short half—life and we need euratom. i absolutely agree with the honourable lady and i have had a lot of correspondence from experts across the field including the royal marsden where cancer research is vital. the issue she raised is aboslutely essentially to get right. i think the burden of the case for staying in

in the commons, the labour leader jeremy corbyn said the cap on public sector pay was causing real hardship. i had a letter last week from a teacher called david. it is all right, here's a teacher, all right? and he said, and i quote, i have been teaching for ten years. i see my workload increase, i have seen more people leave the profession than start, and no form of pay increase in seven years. the only thing holding the education system together is the dedication to struggle on for the students and staff, and he said this dedication is starting to run out, so what we are doing with this pay cap is recklessly exploiting the goodwill of public servants like david. they need a pay rise. let me remind the right honourable gentleman why it has been necessary to exercise restraint. it is because we inherited the biggest deficit in history. the prime ministerfound £1 billion to keep her ownjob, why can't she find the same amount of money to keep nurses and teachers in theirjob, who after all serve all of us? contrary to all of what he said, we have more nurses working in the nhs today compared

if the labour party brings in all this democratisation, that creates infighting in the labour party as well with the selection. will he lasts until 2019? oh, god, no. —— will he last until 2019? and do you think he will he last until 2019? yes, but if she goes she is replaced with another conservative and it does not change anything anyway. thank you both very much. he was a one—man media battle tank, the provider of alternative facts. and tonight he's gone. sean spicer, the president's official spokesman and bulldog in chief, resigned from the white house after mr trump hired a new communications chief, anthony scaramucci, as mr spicer‘s boss, something that mr spicer found hard to stomach. sean spicer has resigned from the white house after mr trump itu communications chief. something that sean spicer found hard communications chief. something that sean spicerfound hard to communications chief. something that sean spicer found hard to stomach. now, let's admit it, sean spicer may have broken the first cardinal rule of comms, don't become the story, but some people will miss h

it was a key part of labour's campaign promise to scrap that. jeremy corbyn also alluded to helping people who currently a re also alluded to helping people who currently are paying off their student debt. he didn't go as far as saying that he would wipe it out altogether, but this morning the shadow education secretary was asked about this. she made clear that although it is not quite a policy, it is definitely an ian and ambition to wipe out that debt. it isa it is a big abacus that i am working on with that. it is a huge amount, 100 billion that they estimate. it isa 100 billion that they estimate. it is a huge amount of money. we have to deal with this debt crisis that we are foisting on our young people. it is not acceptable. they are leaving university with £57,000 worth of debt. it is unassailable. aren't you simply spraying around huge spending policies to recklessly? another hundred billion pounds ride on tuition fees at the last moment. that is some sober you have to find. jeremy said that was an ambition, something he would like to d

market. 0ver success of the uk labour market. over the period has not been growing since 2008, employment has been, fell a lot less than it did in other countries and recovered a lot quicker. unemployment rose a lot less and declined a lot quicker and more. productivity is the output we dues and divided by the number of hours we spent producing it. since the labour market has been successful in keeping people at work, in one sense people could argue the same amount of work has been spread out over more people so it looks like productivity is bad. but there is a positive side of that. so why is it that relative to oui’ that. so why is it that relative to our trading partners, to the rich countries, why are we not as productive as them?|j countries, why are we not as productive as them? i think the main reason we should look for is in the labour market. we have seen in other advanced economy employment fell a lot quicker and did not recover as quick because it means the productivity looks good but for the wrong reasons. we would