gregg and i from five years ago to create a commission empowered to bring to a vote in the senate and the house a plan to get our debt under control and to do it sthat you wouldn't have the endless process that our current situation requires. mr. president, the idea was to create a brac-like systemo that a proposal could come before the senate, could come before the houseo get our debt down. it is modeled in many ways after the reconciliation procs that was designed for deficit reduction and only requires a simple majority vote. there is a failsafe. if this committee fails to produce a result, the failsafe is across-the-board cuts in defense and non-defense spending with exemptions for social security, veterans, low-income people, and it limits the medicare reductions to 2%. mr. president, i would prefer that the medicare reduction not be there because there is no revenue that's assured in this plan. but we do have a have a failsafe. we do have to have some assurance that the savings are actually realized. and this mechanism does that. i think all of us know tha our current status fin

. beginning at noon, and david gregg. wellcome's -- david gregory welcomes john kerry and john mccain. then, alan greenspan and former white house adviser austan goolsbee. at 1:00, the ranking republican on the senate budget committee. also, gloria steinem and the u.s. ambassador to syria. fox news sunday rears at 2:00. chris wallace talks with the house budget chairman paul ryan and tim pawlenty. at 3:00, the former republican presidential candidates steve forbes and the former director of the national economic council in the obama administration, larry summers. also, california gov. jerry brown and tom davis. at 4:00, it is "face the nation." bob schieffer talks with david axelrod, howard dean, and lindsey graham. the five network tv talk shows are brought to you as a public service by the networks and c- span. irs begin at noon. you can listen to them all on c- span radio nationwide on xm channel 119. you can download it as an app or go online to c-span.org. >> did you get eight weeks of vacation this year? i did not. >> the host tries to take a slightly irreverent view on washingt

circles. look at judd gregg from new hampshire. he stepped down as a senator and has now been hired by goldman sachs and they're giving him a lot of money and they are taking a thousand jobs from our economy and moving them overseas. he helped to write the bill that gave goldman sachs millions of dollars and now they are rewarding him. we are not seeing what they are really doing. i had my fingers crossed that the commission would have some reasonable, moderate individuals on there because our country was once run by moderates individuals. republicans and democrats both. host: is the obama white house planning an october surprise for next year to give the president's reelection campaign a boost? right below that is this item. and in "the hill" -- deirdre tweets -- cincinnati, ronald on our independent line. can or should washington do more to help the economy? caller: yes, they should. don't you think it's about time to put money back into the country by getting jobs for people? host: how would you like to see that happen? caller: several thousand bridges out here are almost. condemned

issues than the united states of america. now, are you asking me that question? senator gregg was just a key member of the commission. it is no doubt by far the big structural issue in the united states is our fiscal deficit. it is a formidable issue. coming back to the bowl since then deficit commission, i think what they show to the rest of the world is what a lot of the markets already understand. we are such a rich country and such a big economy that if we act soon and there is a shared sacrifice, we can solve the problem by exporting the sacrifice brought different segments of our country's social upper passed to sacrifice too much. the longer we wait, obviously, the more difficult it will be. what do we have to do to get our fiscal house in order? i think it comes down to -- we need to grow. when we go about it, we have to reform entitlements. we have to reform a tax system. we have to reform a tax system so it gives us the revenues we need and give us growth. i start off by saying, despite all the criticism and how poorly the government performed and all of that, i think th

labor secretary robert reich. this hourlong form is moderated by the former u.s. senator judd gregg. [applause] >> the first question to each speaker comes in the previous secretary. last week we welcome robert rice to have the following questions ch.-- robert reischau >> you get to pose a question to our next speaker and the next speaker -- maybe this is a site with your next question -- but our next speaker is your dartmouth classmate and former treasury secretary henry paulson when. is sitting in that chair, what would you like him to answer? [laughter] >> i have two related questions. why in the wall street bailout did you got condition those funds on wall street doing several things it needed to do, the delay with regard to mortgage mitigation and making money available to main street through small regional banks? also, putting some constraints on lobbying by wall street firms, particularly during the time congress was trying to reform the financial system? [applause] secondly, after you explain all of that -- [laughter] i would like you to tell us whether the social benefits o

labor secretary robert reich. this is money -- moderated by youth of this senator judd gregg. clsme robert reich at the following questions. >> there is one last question, the question you get to pose to our next speaker. i looked up to our next speaker would be. maybe this question is a set with your question. but our next beaker is your dartmouth classmate and former treasury secretary hank paulson. [laughter] so, when he is sitting in that chair, what would you like him to have to answer? >> hank, two related questions. number one, why in the wall street bailout did you not condition those funds on wall street doing several things that it needed to do -- particularly with regard to mortgage and mitigation and also making money available to main street through small regional banks, and also, putting some constraints on lobbying by wall street for our -- firms, principally during the period of time congress was trying to reform the financial system. [applause] and secondly, hank, after you've explained all of that, i would like you to tell us whether the social benefits of wall str

, senator gregg, was a key member of the bulls a sense and -- bowles-simpson commission, and by far the biggest structural issue in the united states is our fiscal deficit. but coming back to the deficit commission, what they showed, i think to the world -- which i think a lot of the markets already understood -- is we are such a rich country and such a big economy that if we act soon and there is shared sacrifice with and solve this problem by spreading the sacrifice throughout different segments of the country so no group has to sacrifice too much. now, the longer we wait, obviously the more difficult it is going to be. what do we have to do to get our fiscal house in order? i think it comes down to we need growth, and so when we go about -- we have to reform entitlements and we have to reform the tax system and we have to reform the tax system so it will give us the revenues we need and give us growth. i start off by saying, despite all of the criticism and how poorly the government performed and all of that -- and i think the criticism is deserved -- let me tell you something, we ha

and many more items. we are joined by gregg mccrary, former fbi profiler. that is our topic this morning as we wrap up this week's series looking at the fbi. what is profiling? guest: good morning, and thanks for having me in. the narrow definition of profiling is the description of the characteristics and traits of the unknown offender. the type of profiling pioneered by the fbi is the retrospective look at crime. in other words, crime has occurred. we are now examining the crime, the crime scene, all of the todence related to theat draw logical inferences about who might have committed this crime. host: the difference between prospective profiling in retrospective profiling. >> those are often confused. perspective profiling is trying to -- prospective a profiling is trying to identify common characteristics to determine who might commit a particular crime, who might be a terrorist or a drug courier. that is far more problematic, because you are going to get a lot of false positives, people who "fit the profile" who really are not a terrorist or card career -- host: what type o

gregg mccrary, former fbi profiler. that is our topic this morning as we wrap up this week's series looking at the fbi. what is profiling? guest: good morning, and thanks for having me in. the narrow definition of profiling is the description of the characteristics and traits of the unknown offender. the type of profiling pioneered by the fbi is the retrospective look at crime. in other words, crime has occurred. we are now examining the crime, the crime scene, all of the todence related to theat draw logical inferences about who might have committed this crime. host: the difference between prospective profiling in retrospective profiling. >> those are often confused. perspective profiling is trying to -- prospective a profiling is trying to identify common characteristics to determine who might commit a particular crime, who might be a terrorist or a drug courier. that is far more problematic, because you are going to get a lot of false positives, people who "fit the profile" who really are not a terrorist or card career -- host: what type of agencies are doing that work? guest: ce

what all of the research says and often that gives a different picture. gregg and his colleagues published in 2010 and analysis of the literature from 1960 up through 2002. it summarizes the e fax any program that served 8325 your old. it could also have been a program that was just nine months. this chart summarizes the e fax of the cognitive domain. it was not the only domain that was looked at. but because of studies have focused on that to a lesser extent, you cannot really break those defects out in the same way and look at the influences on them in the same way that you can analyze the data on cognitive and pacs because there are so many more studies that measure this. one of the it things that makes a difference is the quality of the design. in studies that use more rigorous search designs. the e immediate impact or the impact at the end of treatment which was typically at age five was about 0.7. seven tents of the standard deviation. to put that into perspective, head start children start about a standard deviation behind. if you want to think about the achievement gap fo

very much, gregg. let me acknowledge the wonderful partnership that we had with fema and with secretary napolitano and administrator seagate. if you are going to do to do with mother nature, you could not ask for a better set up -- toe-to-toe with mother nature, you could not ask for a better set of partners. i am not going to repeat what you have already heard about the storm. it is a very big one. it is going to cover a large amount of area. while he cannot exactly predict what curveball mother nature is going to throw at you, i do feel that the american red cross is better prepared, more prepared than ever. we have forced a number of partnerships with the state based organizations like the national baptist convention, like the southern baptist convention, a lot of the ngo's like the naacp and a whole host of other faith based organizations and non-profit organizations. we are anticipating that it will be a huge geographical area with lots of people enacted. from a time perspective, this could take weeks, maybe even months to be able to respond. let me give you a curfew quic