he accused congress of being responsible for the damaged relationship with moscow. he attacked the intelligence community. how does an executive like that expect to engender loyalty across the administration when he is constantly pointing fingers and putting blame and criticism in all directions? >> i agree as a practical matter it is sort of the inevitability of what you are describing, constant attacks including on the intelligence community which are damaging. it is inevitable this kind of thing will happen. it does not make it right that a public servant in the intelligence community or anywhere else takes this kind of action in response. the president is allowed to criticize whoever he wants to criticize, including his own government. it does not make it ok for officials to release it. the long-term implications are extremely damaging. >> there is additional value for us at "the washington post" because when we published our story earlier in the year as characterizing the conversation with turnbull as acrimonious, trump the next date announced denounced the sto

then they had put the system in place for next year's world cup, which is still being held in moscow next summer. this was not going to stop. this was going to continue. grigory had reached -- as he said -- its logical conclusion, and he wanted to bring the story to the world. charlie: take a look at this, clip number two. they discuss the growing concerns about russian knowledge. here it is. >> there is a top-level decision, you know who i mean, and the big boss, vladimir putin thinks, to show the best result in sochi. we must show others who we are. we could make him do one month. decided to use them during sochi. >> through the competition, so they could be at the very top level? >> right. >> vladimir putin? >> instead of using the science, the science you developed to get around the system, you abandoned the science? >> most important, yes. and gentlemen, let me be clear that 126 sessions with the international olympic committee is open. charlie: call to me about what you did in wanting to go through this expanding yourself. guest: i wanted to go through it for many reasons. as a

he is at the time running the third-largest anti-doping laboratory in the world, which is the moscow lab, which had overseen all the testing for the sochi olympics, but was also overseeing testing of all russian athletes across all sports and all international athletes coming to russia to compete. so i began working with gregory. shortly thereafter there is an investigation launched based on this television documentary. that is basically december 2014 to november 2015 and during this year, gregory is under investigation, but i keep going on with my film and gregory is helping to advise me. november 2015, a report comes out based on this investigation and it is now alleging that gregory is essentially the mastermind of the state-sponsored doping program. at the time, it is still only mandated -- the investigation is only onto track and field. this creates a series of events. the lab is shut down. gregory is forced to resign. russia is suspended from world track and field. gregory is basically telling me that he is going to be killed by the russian government, and i helped facilitate h

what did he do in moscow? jo: remember the republican meeting when somebody quit there are only two people in the pay of vladimir putin, rebecca and trump -- dana rohrabacher and trump? -- left andn left said not to repeat that. charlie: here's a clip. samantha: -- >> if someone says to you they want to give you information, there's nothing wrong with that. that was a legitimate thing to ask, and determine, absolutely, there's nothing wrong with -- by the way, i am the chairman of europeope, asian and, and eurasian subcommittee, including emerging threats. [laughter] samantha: you are? jesus. somebody get him off. you have slurred your piece. i'm sure the rest of your colleagues would like a turn. myi appreciate it so much, very good friend from california. nice crowd you guys got there. i haven't seen that many empty birthdayce ted cruz's party. charlie: you do a 30 minute show once a week. we never want to do more than one per week. can you imagine?? charlie: some of your specials, people say it would be so

curtis stamm, moscow. samantha: that was always a part of it. charlie: was that a part of going in, or is it something you just thought of one day, let's go to russia? samantha: for the first few shows, i went to jordan. the big part of the thought process behind creating this show -- miles: we have to get her in the field. it is what she is good at. samantha: i do not feel like we are changing. everybody is getting better at their job. other things are flowing into the stream. samantha: we did a musical. charlie: tell me about the not the white house correspondents dinner. how did that come about? samantha: i was sitting in my office with jo and another one of our producers. we were having a fun conversation. newt gingrich said something about how the white house press corps was an anachronism and we should get rid of it. we were talking and riffing and having a nice conversation. we were wondering if the white house correspondents would exist. that was last november. charlie: what's amazing, we do the same thing. we see something in the paper

we will also look at moscow's massive renewal program and how refugees are flowing into the amazon. all that ahead on bloomberg businessweek. ♪