gideon versus wainwright which established the right to counsel in criminal cases or even contrast judge gorsuch to chief justice john roberts, privacy the liberty interest before the due process clause. at his hearing judge gorsuch repeatedly parroted critical supreme court decisions were precedents of the court, that he would follow unless and until they were overturned but he said no light on what he felt about those precedents or whether or not he would be inclined or disinclined to vote to overturn them. only after considerable prodding the judge gorsuch eventually agree that the decision in brown versus board of education, which did away with the doctrine of separate but equal and desegregated schools across the nation was correct. having to pry out of judge gorsuch that concession does not inspire confidence in him. his performance at the hearings left us with many troubling things that we don't know about judge gorsuch, but equally troubling about judge gorsuch are the things we do know about him. we do know that judge gorsuch argued the hobby lobby decision in which he rul