tv Inside Story 2018 Ep 87 Al Jazeera March 29, 2018 10:32am-11:01am +03
at least sixty eight people are being killed in a jail riot police station in venezuela now tear gas was fired at family members demonstrating outside the facility in valencia west of the capital caracas that happened in the central city where it's believed to be the deadliest incident of its kind in the country's history. egypt's state newspaper has said that the fact that sisi is heading for a second term as president preliminary election results have c.c. in the lead with twenty one and a half million votes his election is seen as a foregone conclusion after all other credible candidates withdrew saying they faced intimidation the u.s. judge has cleared the way for the nine eleven victims to sue saudi arabia the kingdom had attempted to have the case is dismissed families of the victims allege that saudi arabia helped plan the september the eleventh attacks in two thousand and one the saudi government has long denied involvement in the attacks which killed almost three thousand people. u.s. president donald trump has replaced another senior member of his team veterans
affairs secretary david sorkin is the second cabinet secretary to leave over a travel expense controversy trump wants to replace him with white house dr randy jackson. malala yousafzai has returned to pakistan for the first time since being shot in the head in twenty twelve she was accompanied by her father and is expected to be taught pakistani officials the twenty year old was attacked by a taliban gunman for homework supporting girls' education those were the headlines of the back with more news in thirty minutes next it's inside story to stay with just. one journalist decided to sacrifice their integrity for our hole in the media the listening post at this time on al-jazeera. a surprise summit between china and north korea it's all smiles in beijing join kim jong un's first overseas trip as
leader of the chinese remind the world that they have a crucial role in any nuclear and missile towards with donald trump so is the north in a stronger position this inside story. they've been allies since the nineteen fifties hundreds of thousands of chinese soldiers are believed to have died in the korean war and the north spin an important offer for china ever since keeping u.s. troops allied with south korea away from the chinese border but there were nation ships soured as the north's nuclear bomb an intercontinental missile ambitions expanded under the leadership of kim jong un this year though diplomacy has been high on the north's agenda including groundbreaking visits to the winter olympics south of the border and comes due at summits with both the south korean and
american presidents or the multinational ally seemed to be sidelined with kim choosing china for his first overseas trip as leader or chinese leaders have a charles to assert their influence in any diplomatic solution here that's holocaust spondon to adrian brown in beijing. if she jingping this was a diplomatic triumph he not u.s. president donald trump now the first world leader to meet kim jong un chinese state controlled media waited until kim was back home before confirming what officials had tried so hard to deny just a day earlier. in the great hall of the people kim and his wife were welcomed like old friends appearance is important at times like this she opted for a business suit whereas kim stuck to the look favored by his father and grandfather the wives of both men were present during most of the photo opportunities. visits
like this are all about symbolism for she it served as a reminder that china still holds sway over its neighbor and intends to be at the center of diplomatic efforts to achieve a nuclear free korean peninsula. it's not clear what made him come to beijing or indeed what incentives he may have been offered to do so but china remains north korea's only real friend and ally so it's fair to assume the president xi jinping might want to know what kim's negotiating strategy will be during his upcoming summit with president trump. kim's visit made it possible for china to know what north korea will be talking about to south korea and the united states in these discussions on the nuclearization china has also learned what north korea demands will be which will help china. it's a visit that would have seemed unimaginable just a few months ago where north korea was ignoring chinese appeals for restraint at an
exhibition showcasing some of china's technological achievements the message appeared to be we can help you with all of this if you behave. china's leaders are fond of metaphors that are lavish banquet she told his guest that in the beautiful season of spring everything comes to life kim replied i believe our meeting will yield abundant fruit that could mean making good on his commitment to give up nuclear weapons the fruits of spring were apparent in the garden of the state guest house where friendship also seemed to blossom she accepted an invitation to visit north korea and told him he was welcome to visit china again the visitors left happy adrian brown al-jazeera beijing. well china and north korea have a mutual defense treaty signed decades ago but chinese leaders have tried to
convince their neighbors to stop developing nuclear bombs the chinese government led seven years of negotiations alone a six party talks to dismantle rule of korea's nuclear program after kim jong un took power in two thousand and eleven the chinese were surprised by the purge of several koreans with close links to china including kim's uncle jang song taek or commanded his chinese allies with missile and nuclear bomb tests and china suspended coal and iron imports from the north last year and china's overall trade with north korea declined by more than ten percent in two thousand and seventeen and that appears to be a major economic blow considering china accounts for almost ninety percent of total trade well let's bring in our panel now from saul chatter carol the director of m.k. news a new site focused on north korea from beijing on a tangan and investment banker an advisor to the chinese government on economic and development issues and from chicago called for
a tall fellow at the chicago council on global affairs welcome to you all mr couch ken jong un's first trip to a foreign country since taking power in two thousand and eleven just how significant is that and does it mean that north korea is now ready for more engagement on the nuclear issue. well it's significant in the sense that it is condolence first of a trip overseas it's been six years since he became leader. and going to china in his father's ahmed trained seems like a small voice of security is a priority but you know it is for the north korean government and i think he's very into the look at all of this in the big picture which is this diplomacy we're seeing now is coming after a very intensive year of mr allonby killer testing and it's a year in which we saw three r.c.b. ends and test it and the north korean stating definitively that they develop
development plans have been complete they did for it in the state and it killed force in. north korea it has claimed its completed its nuclear weapons programs and it's now willing to talk but it seems the distance denethor is ation it wants to talk about is a very lofty version very little to go and that's going to be a lot of difficulty in laying the foundation for a credible path where to you that will satisfy all sides mr tradeoff as mr kalvin saying it has been a year of tensions on the korean peninsula we had a year of threat tests more sanctions but does this me saying show that the sanctions are working. i think it's really too early to to say that there has been some anecdotal evidence that has come out people have been watching gas prices that had spiked in the past but then those came back to just about normal and so
there's really no way to tell i think we need to remember that if sanctions are really going to work they need to target the regime and those at the very top but of course north korea is a criminal organization that is built on a national scale and so the money flows up and the consequences flow down so if there are people suffering there probably at lower levels and the north korean regime has showed continually that it has no real regard for citizens at lower levels so if sanctions really are the reason for this we're going to need to wait and see there is a bank of korea report that's due out later this year where they're going to make estimates on the north korean economy but for now i see this more as north korea thinking that it has an advantage and it's not so much sanctions that are pushing it into negotiations with the united states and others and this attack and whatever it is that is pushing north korea to these new round of negotiations how significant is it for the chinese president xi jinping to tens for nations with north korea last year and looking increasingly sidelined.
well i don't think you could ever sideline the largest neighbor they have the longest border china is going to be necessary to any kind of resolution keep in mind that despite all this talk the situation has not changed the u.s. is not going to abide a north korea with the nuclear threat capability reaching of the united states and it's very doubtful that the d.p. r. k. would give up its only leverage which is its nuclear program so there has to be some sort of breakthrough that comes through and i think that probably will have to be some sort of security guarantee either by russia china or both because there is perhaps a lack of trust when it comes to the united states given what has happened with iran what happened in with saddam hussein and khadafi and assad so in these particular instances it's doubtful that the p r k is going entirely
trust the u.s. and these might be just the beginning for rays of either play for time or to see what china the u.s. and the world will pay to have the d.p. r. k. under control so how what do you make of that what is china willing to do to control north korea of course has that very enviable tosk. keeping it and line of it at the same time not punishing enough to risk a regime collapse on its border. yes a choice nice main go with the d.p. r. k. is to ensure that their first step that it's a noble goal and i think the days they go to needs are the mission comes beneath the stars especially with the level of threat that escalated last year when you had pyongyang threatening to surround us co-opt them with medium range missiles at
best and so on there was a real fear that that could break out soon. but we have a very difficult situation ahead and i think the primary problem is very different expectations in china south korea and the united states about the best way to go forward and just to get the real text your from that it was just don't bolton who just the other day said that before being appointed national security adviser that he favors the trump summit because if the north koreans agree to telling the u.s. which pools in and puts the planes can come into to collect north korea's nuclear program john bolton is all full that anything else then it's a good excuse to use a military option and that's pretty unrealistic right thing for d.p. r. k. south korean and chinese perspectives on this in this trade off how do you see the new national security adviser john bolton's role in all of this
given his talk of the pasta you know attacking north korea how much that new appointment factor into these talks do you think. well of course you have to wonder about how the new national security advisor is going to advise the president my primary concern is what he's going to do with the national security council staff if you look down down the staff there are several very reliable people who have been working with korea who know korea well and i think of played a very important role in being intermediaries and going back and forth not only to china obviously but also to south korea one of our most important allies if he determines that they are not reliable that they are perhaps holdovers from the obama administration which i know that a few of them are and they are then sidelined or perhaps kicked out of the national security council altogether the replacements that come in for those people are going to be very important to watch in terms of what they're recommending to do on korea their connections back on to the korean peninsula and how they see this
playing out that's a tag on is the u.s. even ready for its extent of talks with north korea for this missing this much anticipated meeting between president trump and kim jong un given what mr fayed has just said and the fact that the embassy in seoul doesn't have an ambassador there's not a secretary of state yet. well . my colleague has pointed out some of the larger flaws in this in the technical sense but you know donald trump it's not clear that even understands what's going on in terms of the situation he's not willing to be briefed and if he has. john bolton whispering in his ear bomb them back to the stone ages he just might i mean people when we're talking about bolton remember this is a man who is still defending the invasion of iraq that killed you know those responsible for killing millions of people it's for four to six trillion dollars of
u.s. debt and here's somebody who's advise in the president the present president who called all of bush's appointees and neo cons the you know the greatest fiasco on earth so no he's not prepared obviously and this is why it's going to be a fiasco at best i think china has stepped in to try to calm the waters ahead of this note that they fully briefed trump and his team as to what they were doing there has to be some sort of semblance an adult in the room and that's where it's not going to come from donald trump i think young kim was very concerned in the first questions i would ask if him or let us say the first answers i would want is what would china do if the u.s. attacked north korea and second what it what position do you tend to take on these sanctions are these going to continue or get worse the answer those questions would have a lot to do with how i would be personally proceeding. mr couch so it doesn't sound
like you know from what either of my guests a saying that the u.s. as very prepared for these talks what about south korea and president because you know we had kim jong un's father kim jong il make his first trip to china and india two thousand reportedly to consult with the chinese leadership ahead of his summit with the south korea's then lida are we seeing something similar here and is south korea more prepared than their previous governments have begun and then the u.s. is now well the south korean summit is is interesting in the sense that it's going to be going very soon and we strongly that they've motivated it almost equally in the same way as the north korean interest in particular in this idea and kim jong un's new speech full is something you know all this into clear apartments take place both careers were very were it last year
about the threat of war and i think that selfishly for the right reasons. oh beijing and pyongyang are kind of all in the same page with regards to probably won't wind wanting to provide optics that will satisfy trump at least until the end of his in his generation and so whatever it can take from those three i'm not saying they can be working side by side. they are coming from the same feel of concern and so if they can come to an agreement where north korea on the set face agrees to give up more amount of its nuclear program and ever before on the cephus then that could satisfy trump for the short. list of eight how do you think that north korea is in a place now where it would denuclearize denuclearize to some extent because kim jong un did speak about it with the chinese president.
well denuclearizing to some extent still leads a nuclear north korea and that outcome i think is going to be unacceptable to the united states for now they may try to pursue a freeze for freeze that is north korea doesn't develop any more weapons and the u.s. perhaps goes back and starts to think about a freeze on its military. exercises with south korea but again the result is they're the same that we're left with a nuclear north korea that's a tag and what do you make of that well. i mean it's. talks about this fact that these three are working together let's see what the alternatives would be hundreds of thousands if not millions of south koreans being killed by not to clear arms but by conventional weapons the nine to thirteen thousand artillery pieces that are aimed at about a one quarter of the south korean population yes i think they are concerned and
they don't want to war so talking about this in dispassionate terms as if this is some sort of exercise in the classroom is not a fair way of doing it i think the whole world would like a resolution to this right now you have donald trump saying that he wants to act tough he wants to show his base that he can push this little guy around and that they either do what he wants or else and this is not the way that you conduct diplomacy it's the reason why most of the world is looking askance at him he's not reliable or predictable those are the two bedrocks of business and diplomacy and so far he's offering neither a set of how what will do you think it takes to find a resolution to this could we have a resumption of six party talks i don't think that's likely but i do think. first of all trump has the trungpa ministration and the ball and bolton
especially have very very high unrealistic expectations about the m. to demilitarize the peninsula and the reason i mention those three countries working together is because in effect they have to human. that very senior pilots in the u.s. administration and provide optics that make it look like they're getting what they want and the north koreans in a way can help that by refresher training for nuclear and missile testing in gauging in shuttle diplomacy with beijing and south korea at the highest levels all of those kind of things even meeting with all paper that's been floated by tokyo from some sources all of those kind of things really reduce the chances that we're going to wake up here and saw one morning with the sound of artillery. but you know actual strike from the best that comes out and the straight hole for all of those things will all of those things be enough without any real involvement from the u.s. if it's just not ready not up to it. you know the u.s.
involvement i think you know it's been touched on before that that when president trump shows up to this he's going to be probably wholly unprepared for what he's about to get into i would note that this is been you know quite well played by by the south koreans in the fact that one of the things that donald trump has noted throughout his presidency is that he's taking a transactional approach while prime minister rabin has tried to warm up to donald trump and and perhaps have played golf with him appear to be friends that it has gotten japan very little but south korea has been more under pressure from the united states and yet it has delivered one of the most prized deliverables to president trump and that's the the ability for him to appear as a statesman so for him to appear as the great negotiator and they've secured a deal for him to meet with kim jong un they've played that very well and i think that has brought the south koreans more closely into the u.s. forward and made them a more reliable partner for the united states from the united states point of view let's just hang on what would you like to see the united states do with this
opportunity that's been presented to them from the south koreans especially after you know the last year of heightened tensions that we've had what this not be a wasted opportunity if nothing was done. well there's very little that can be done i mean from the u.s. political side it doesn't matter if it's donald trump or another president any president who allowed a nuclear north korea to have nuclear capabilities against the united states would be voted out of office and probably along with his party so that's just not something that can happen politically the issue here is that the u.s. should be working with china and russia japan south korea and saying you know even if they don't have six party talks let's get it together and have a unified position what is it that we need to do i'm willing to take our troops out of south korea if this is helps china come to terms with taking care of the
d.p. r. k. and by that i mean insisting on a de nuclear do need denuclearization of the place at the threats of all of these powers saying well you either go if you go against one of us you go against all of us trump was trying to seize the spotlight for himself aided by the south koreans i agree very canny move but right now it looks like kim jong un is the crafty one he's gotten both beijing and united and washington to come to him this is unheard of for a country that is considered a rogue nation that has defied the u.n. and so carol even if we don't see those six party talks which don't sound entirely likely could we see there's the political will exist for the things that mr tangan is talking about to take place. is there any probably
doesn't the russian charani east south korean side but the u.s. and japanese are question mark arbib. and i fill the u.s. as we as we're saying those just very high expectations and detroit nation is by people always going to be a multi the face endeavor you know but they have freeze doing you have inspection as you have dissembled them and then you have to do something for scientists that's not going to happen overnight as john bolton wants and it's hard to know where with the trump ministration where the line is between tough talk bluster and real initiative in and sort of thinking in mode today ssion and keeping all of that in mind mr feed off what do you think is the best that we can expect out of the progress that we have had the cea. i think the best that we
can expect is that negotiations are going to be ongoing negotiations fail of course the ominous alternative is a perhaps preventative strike by the united states which would lead to perhaps all out war so the best we can hope for especially when this round of summer tree is done but say that kim and trump do end up meeting which i think is going to happen unlike many people who have their doubts but i think the best that will best outcome from that will be essentially they agree to keep talking. any other outcome i think plays to the advantage of kim jong un. is going into this with with his kind of chosen adventure and seeing that president trump really wants to do this does it isn't going to be well briefed on the situation and even having the meeting is probably one of the goals of kim jong un and in of itself so let's just hope that they come out of this there is no disaster from any of the summits and there's an agreement that negotiations are going to continue they're going to be young going in that contact will be maintained meserve thank you very much for that. joining us from chicago from seoul chadha carol and from beijing eina tangan
and thank you too for watching you can see the program again any time by visiting our website c.n.n. dot com and for further discussion do go to our facebook page that's facebook dot com forward slash a.j. and side story you can also join the conversation on twitter handle is at a.j. and side story from the elizabeth and the whole team here thank you very much for watching and bye for now. systemic corruption in politics through business it's all new to who is controlling what states what resources people in power investigates the misuse of south africa's state assets nobody who'll use implicate good name didn't the board
was ever with their point of view on the financial rewards available to an accommodating business community south africa corruption inc on not just zero and under put it well on. u.s. and british companies have announced the biggest discovery of natural gas in west africa but what to do with these untapped natural resources is already a source of heated debate nothing much has changed they still spend most of their days looking forward to full dry river beds like this one five years on the syrians still feel battered or even those who managed to escape their country haven't truly been able to escape the war. facing realities growing up when did you realize that you were living in a special place a so-called secret city getting to the heart of the matter why is activists to live in jail just because he expressed himself he had
a story on the talk to al-jazeera at this time. where every. what makes this moment this era we're living through so unique this is really an attack on the truth itself is a lot of misunderstanding the distortion isn't of what free speech is supposed to be about the context it's hugely important level right to publish it beat up again to be offensive all provoked it's all about it as people do setting the stage for a serious debate up front at this time on al-jazeera.