tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN February 24, 2017 2:00pm-3:01pm PST
out of the world trump lead. trump is giving nasa the go ahead that could make matt damon's mission to mars a reamount. they are moving forward with tests ordered by the trump administration to possibly send astronauts on the next orion flight in 2019. of course first nasa needs to finish building the rocket that can push orion to mars or theoretically beyond. be sure to tune into cnn this sunday, state of the union, bernie sanders, chris christie, that's it for "the lead." turn ing it over to wolf blitzer in "the situation room." thanks for watching. >> happening now, denials of wrongdoing, the white house says it did no wrong in asking the fbi to knock down reports of contacts between trump aides and russian officials during the election campaign. but democrats are demanding an investigation. blocked from briefing, in an unprecedented move, the white house bars cnn, the new york times, and other major news
organizations from a press briefing while selectively letting others in. did president trump order the punishment? irony and insults, the president gives a speech slamming the news media and repeating the phrase, quote, enemy of the people. the president says no one should use unnamed sources, this on the same day that the white house held a press briefing attributed to unnamed officials. and nerve agent murder, did north korea use the deadly est of all chemical nerve agents, a substance banned around the world, to kill the half brother of the dictator kim jong-un? i'm wolf blitzer. you're in t"the situation room." president trump on the offensive, lashing out at both the fbi and the news media. he used twitter to slam the fbi saying you can't stop national security leakers who he says are giving classified information to
the media. but the white house is also playing defense after cnn was the first to report that top officials asked the fbi to knock down media reports that trump associates were in frequent contact with russian officials during the election campaign. the white house says it wasn't trying to pressure the fbi, but house democratic leader nancy pelosi says chief of staff reince priebus, and i'm quoting her now, committed an outrageous breach of the fbi's independence and she's now asking for a formal investigation. the president is also keeping up his attacks on the media and railing against what he calls fake news and again using the phrase, quote, enemy of the people. and in a stunning break with accepted long-standing practice, the white house, without any explanation, barred cnn, the new york times, and other major news organizations from a briefing by the press secretary sean spicer. and a stunning new twist in the
brother of the half brother, i should say, of the north korean dictator kim jong-un, official in malaysia say he was killed by the deadly est of all chemical nerve agents, vx, a substance banned internationally. i'll speak with republican congressman jim heinz of the intelligence committee and our correspondents analysts and gifts are standing by with full coverage of the day's top stories. let's begin with the white house denial of any wrongdoing in its conversation with the fbi as democrats call for an investigation. our justice correspondent pamela brown has new details on this cnn exclusive. pamela, what are you learning? >> reporter: well, wolf, today the white house isn't denying cnn's exclusive reporting that it requested the fbi to speak out against report about trump's associates and their contacts with russians. but it pushed back against any suggestion it put pressure on the fbi to do so, saying the contact over the report was made by the fbi first. today the white house is saying it did nothing wrong after cnn's
exclusive report that the fbi refused the white house's request to knock down media reports about contacts between donald trump associates and russians during the campaign. a senior administration official says the unusual white house request came only after the fbi approached white house chief of staff reince priebus to say a story in the new york times as not true. the white house explained its actions by saying the conversation happened on february 15th after a 7:30 a.m. meeting led by priebus. fbi deputy director andy mccabe asked priebus for five minutes alone after the meeting end according to officials. new york times calls it total bs, he asked, can we do anything about it to set the record straight? and follow-up phone calls administration official say both mccabe and fbi director james comey declined priebus's request
but did tell him he could cite top intelligence official to say there is nothing to the story. >> i've talked to the top levels of the intelligence community and they have assured me that that new york times story was grossly overstated and inaccurate and totally wrong. >> reporter: the back and forth between the white house and the fbi raises questions about whether either side violated long-standing justice department procedures. >> it is very, very important that you limit contacts between the white house and the department of justice for two reasons. one, you don't want actual pressure placed upon the department of justice in connection with the investigation or prosecution. and two, you don't even want the appearance of influence. >> reporter: according to d.o.j. memos, communication should happen if it is for the performance of president's duties and appropriate from a law enforcement perspective.
it precludes them from talking directly about pending investigations. >> typically the contact from the department of justice side comes from the attorney general or the deputy attorney general. it would be unusual for the fbi director or the deputy director to have conversation with white house officials without the presence of the attorney general or the deputy attorney general because they report up to the attorney general. >> reporter: with the unusual communication now under scrutiny, president trump railed against the leaks that have plagued his administration, writing on twitter, the fbi is totally unable to stop the national security leakers. classified information is being given to media that could have a devastating effect on u.s. find now. and he accused the press of fabricating stories. >> i'm against the people that makeup stories and makeup sources. they shouldn't be allowed to use sources unless they use somebody's name.
>> reporter: now, the white house denies talking about the white house investigation specifically saying the discussion only centered on the reports and the u.s. official says that the deputy director andy mccabe did not talk specifics about the case. meantime cnn has learned or in a classified briefing on capitol hill fbi director comey did not dismiss the existence of any communications between russians and trump advisors. he did, however, take issue with the characterization of those communications as involving russian intelligence as the new york times reported, according to a congressional source. wolf? >> all right, pamela, thanks for the good reporting. our breaking news after the president used the speech today to step up his attacks on the news media, the white house blocked cnn, the new york times and other major news organizations from a briefing by the press secretary sean spicer. cnn white house correspondent sara murray was among those excluded from that briefing. she's joining us now from the white house. what happened, sara? you were standing outside his office when all the reporters
were supposed to go in and they barred you from going to that briefing? >> reporter: that's right, wolf. we were waiting for an off-camera gaggle with the white house press secretary. we were told it would be an expanded pool. we weren't told what that meant. apparently they created a list of reporters they wanted to speak with today. white house press secretary want today speak with. they said cnn was not on the list. it's not out of the ordinary for administration officials to maybe have gaggles with smaller groups of reporters, for instance, they might invite a group of columnists in for a meeting. what is unusual was the way they selected their group of reporters. they hand picked certain media out lets. for instance, every other major television network except for cnn was allowed in. they also allowed in a number of news outlets that are more conservative leaning and more favorable to the president including breitbart, one american news network, and the washington times. but they included major newspapers like the new york times. they excluded, sorry, excuse me, major newspapers like the new
york times and like politico and i've asked a number of white house aides in the communications shop why they hand picked these news outlets. so far they have been unable or unwilling to answer that question. >> it's pretty shocking when you think about it. the president today once again called the media fake news, and the enemy of the american people. update our viewers on that. >> reporter: well, wolf, the president was clearly speaking to his base at this conservative conference today and he served up exactly the red meat he wanted -- they wanted to hear before he ran through a number of his policy priorities. he took some shots at the media. today the president leveraging his in front of a friendly audience to further escalate his attacks. >> i want you all to know we are fighting the fake news. it's fake, phony, fake. [cheering and applauding] a few days ago i called the fake news the enemy of the people, and they are.
they are the enemy of the people. >> reporter: after an extended opening -- against the media. >> it doesn't represent the people, it never will represent the people, and we're going to do something about it. >> reporter: donald trump touted his presidential achievements so far. >> basically all i've done is keep my promise. >> reporter: and defended his administration's plans to crackdown on undocumented immigrants living in the u.s. >> as we speak today, immigration officers are finding the gang members, the drug dealers, and the criminal aliens and throwing them the hell out of our country. [cheering and applauding] >> reporter: as trump ticked through his top agenda item he revived his campaign rallying cry and vowed to build a wall along the southern border. >> we're building the wall. we're building the wall. in fact it's going to start soon. >> reporter: today u.s. customs and border protection announced it will soon ask for design proposals for prototype wall structures near the u.s.-mexico
border. and after the administration's first effort to temporarily ban immigration from some muslim majority countries was blocked by the courts, today trump previewed a new executive order. >> we are going to keep radical islamic terrorists the hell out of our country. [cheering and applauding] we will not be deterred from this course. and in a matter of days we will be taking brand-new action to protect our people and keep america safe. >> reporter: all of this as trump offered clues about his first presidential budget. the president has insisted he would cut spending, but today he pointed to a dramatic increase in military spending. >> we're also putting in a massive budget request for our beloved military. [cheering and applauding] it will be one of the greatest military buildups in american history.
>> reporter: and he vowed yet again to repeal and replace obamacare. dismissing the outcry members of congress have seen back home in their districts. >> the people that you're watching, they're not you. they're largely, many of them are the side that lost, you know, they lost the election. it's like how many elections do we have to have? they lost the election. [ laughter ] but i always say, obamacare doesn't work. >> reporter: for trump, the event today was something of a victory lap. while his 2011 speech at the conservative political action conference previewed his political convictions, he snubbed the event last year. what a difference the year makes. >> the dishonest media will say he didn't get a standing ovation. >> reporter: now, while the president went over a number of his priorities at cpac today, he didn't give a lot of details about the time line or, for instance, what he will do on tax reform or on health care repeal and replace. he's speaking to congress next week, wolf, so it will be
interesting to see if he offers more meat on the bones in terms of substance when he talks to them. back to you. >> that speech before congress tuesday night. sara murray, thank you very much. joining us now democratic congressman jim hiemz of connecticut, he's a member of the house intelligence committee. congressman, thanks for joining us. >> hello, wolf. >> let me get your quick reaction first to this truly unprecedented move by the white house today, blocking cnn, the new york times, the los angeles times, politico, buzz feed, other major news organizations from a briefing. what's your reaction to that? >> a well, this is all part of the larger effort president trump is doing to try to isolate and attack all of those whose job is fundamentally to get at the truth. and let's face it, i understand that he's called the media the enemy of the people. there's a reason that freedom of the press is the first amendment to the constitution because it's essential to a functioning democracy. though the media doesn't get it right all of the time, their job, by the way, like the fbi's
job, like the cia's job is fundamentally about getting to the truth. but the truth is so poisonous to this administration that they will continue to try to raise doubts and to isolate and to criticize anyone around them who speaks the truth. >> let's turn to the other top story, the white house says that white house official didn't do anything wrong when they asked the fbi to knock down reports of contacts between trump aides during the campaign and russian officials. you sit on the house intelligence committee which is already investigating links between russia and president trump's fired national security advisor michael flynn. should your committee begin digging into this as well? >> yes, we should. and i mean, the idea that they didn't do anything wrong is just absurd. there is a memo from may of 2009 that makes it very clear that people in the fbi and justice department in general are not to have this kind of contact with the white house. people should think a little bit about what it is that the white house and the chief of staff asked the fbi to do.
they said help us knock down this story. they asked for a very political thing there. and if you step back away from this, wolf, you have to ask yourself the question. if there's no there there, a the white house has repeat lid claimed and shown to be wrong, michael flynn was only calling the ambassador to wish him a merry christmas and that turns out to be false, in a long line of falsehoods, if in fact the white house is correct and that there was no contact with russians and there is just nothing to see there, they should be out in front saying, let's do this investigation, let's show everything, let's get the documents out, let's move on so we can start talking about infrastructure. but of course they're acting in exactly the opposite way. they're doing everything they can to dee legitimatize the study to say that the truth doesn't matter and continuing to be dishonest about it. that is not the activities of a group of people who, in fact, don't have anything to hide. >> should the white house chief of staff reince priebus face some sort of discipline for his contacts with the fbi during this pending investigation? >> well, i think we need to hear
reassurances from the white house that this will never happen again. and, you know, lest my friend on the other side of the aisle need a reminder how serious this is, it was way, way, way back maybe three or four months ago when they were out of their mind with outrage that bill clinton got on the plane with then attorney general lynch. this is an absolute catastrophe. now you have the boss, the president's chief of staff not deliberately denying it, but trying to spin the fbi, no big deal, nothing to see here. it is a big deal and we need assurances from the white house that they will do what they would do if there was in fact nothing to hide, which is to say we're cooperating fully with all of these investigations and we will keep our hands off of it until the investigations are done and the american people know what happened with the russians, what happened with michael flynn, and all of the things that these investigations need to get to the bottom of >> the attorney general jeff sessions as you know very early supporter of president trump's
election campaign, constant fixture out there on the campaign trail, given his political connections to the president, should he recuse himself from any investigation into these ties between trump campaign official and russian officials? >> you know, this is the classic situation where you would have a recusal, where you would have the appointment of a special prosecutor, particularly since the entity and the people being investigated have shown day in and day out with attack on the fbi, with attempts to go to the fbi to get the fbi to spin the truth, they have shown themselves not to be acting in good faith and helping out in this investigation. so, yes, i do think it would be appropriate just as attorney general lynch did subsequent to that meeting with bill clinton in that aircraft, she recused herself from any of the investigations around the e-mail. jeff sessions at this point needs to appoint a special prosecutor. we need to have an outside commission. we need to take this out of the political realm in its entirety and get to the bottom of all of
the allegations and problems here. >> there are more questions for you, congressman. i need to you stand by. we'll continue our conversation right after a quick break. your path to retirement may not always be clear. but at t. rowe price, we can help guide your retirement savings. so wherever your retirement journey takes you, we can help you reach your goals. call us or your advisor t. rowe price. invest with confidence. ♪ (music pla♪ throughout) announcer: get on your feet for the nastiest bull
in the state of texas. ♪ ♪ (crowd cheers) ♪ on a perfect car, then smash it into a tree. your insurance company raises your rates. maybe you should've done more research on them. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. and if you do have an accident, our claims centers are available to assist you 24/7. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. start your party prep with venus embrac...touch of aloe a... because the best bit of the party is the pre-party party and venus snap for those last minute invites
we're back with democratic congressman jim himes of connecticut, member of the intelligence committee. the president lashed out on twitter today. let me read his tweet. the fbi is totally unable to stop the national security leakers that have permeated our government for a long time. they can't even find the leakers within the fbi itself. classified information is being given to the media that could
have a devastating effect on u.s. find now. as you know, congressman, many congressional investigations only take place because of the information that first comes to light in the news media. what do you make of the president's direct attack today on the fbi? >> well, first of all, like so much of what he says, it's simply not true. that the story came out, broken by cnn that the chief of staff to the white house had asked the fbi to help color a story was hardly classified national security information. what is a threat to this country, of course, is when iran and china and north korea see the president of the united states attacking his own security services, his own intelligence community, you can only imagine what the leaders of those countries are thinking, knowing that the united states president is apparently at war with the very people who will advise him on the motion sensitive questions of whether there is a threat to the united states, whether there is a terrorist threat, what the russians are doing, what the
chinese are doing. it's just -- this has been one of the most disheartening things of the trump administration. the president of the united states has got to stop publicly attacking the patriotic men and women who put their lives at risk to keep this country safe. >> it makes no sense to go after the fbi like this. earlier he suggested the intelligence community was -- the cia was like nazi germany. you said this morning on cnn's new day and i'm quoting you now, you said there is no doubt in my mind that if this story broke in an alternative universe with a president clinton, articles of impeachment would be drawn up as we speak. are you suggesting that president trump should face impeachment? >> no, i'm not suggesting that at all. i think it is way, way too early and i don't think that that kind of discussion is helpful to getting to where i think we all want to go, which is to a stabilized white house where we can talk about infrastructure, where we can talk about tax reform, try to find ways to work together. i don't think any impeachment
talk is particularly helpful in that regard. the point i was trying to make was think about what the very people who are running the country today said about the possibility that chelsea clinton might remain on the board of the clinton foundation, a nonprofit foundation. that was a huge deal. but when kellyanne conway is selling trump attire out of the white house, that's just not that big a deal. when, as i told you before, there is a meeting between ex-president clinton and attorney general on the tar mack of some airport, that is a massive deal. a huge attacks on the clintons, but now we actually have somebody in the white house trying to get the fbi color a story. you know what, there is no question in my mind if clinton were president right now and what happened last night happened, there would be lots of talk in the republican congress about the impeachment of alternate universe president clinton. >> congressman jim himes of connecticut, thanks very much. >> thank you, would have. >> coming up, the latest and very disturbing revelation that an internationally banned chemical weapon was used to kill
and i finally found our big idaho potato truck. it's been touring the country telling folks about our heart healthy idaho potatoes, america's favorite potatoes, and donating to local charities along the way. but now it's finally back home where it belongs. aw man. hey, wait up. where you goin'? here we go again. why do so many businesses rely on the u.s. postal service? because when they ship with us, their business becomes our business. ♪ that's why we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country. ♪ here, there, everywhere. united states postal service
we're following multiple developments in a story cnn was first to report, that top official over at the white house asked the fbi to refute stories that trump associates were in frequent contacts with russian official during the election campaign. the white house says there was no wrongdoing, that it was not trying to pressure the fbi. also today, president trump lashed out at both the fbi and the news media. let's bring in our experts. and let me start with david axelrod. david, he's blaming the fbi for
these leaks for the ongoing investigation, but in the process he seems to be confirming cnn's own excellent reporting. >> he sure seems to be, wolf. first of all, let me say i agree with what congressman himes just said, which is it's hard to understand how the story about the white house chief of staff calling the fbi to try and enlist them in quelling a story that discomfited the president is a national security matter or a classified matter. so, we should set that aside. that is no more true than when news organizations do some stories that he doesn't like, that that qualifies them as enemies of the people. but the underlying story is one that should be further explored by the congress and others, and that is did the chief of staff call over there for that purpose. because there are real lines of demarcation that should not be
crossed by a white house chief of staff running political errand for the president over at the fbi. if that's what happened, it clearly bears more investigation. >> do you think it was irresponsible, mark preston, to be coordinating, if you will, a white house chief of staff asking the fbi for some back up in denying these stories? >> i would even go a little stronger than saying coordinating. i would say influencing, attempting to influence the fbi to try to get on board with the narrative that there was really nothing there, and they needed their back up. especially at a time right now when there is so much politicalization with the fbi and the past election and ongoing investigation. so, i don't think necessarily reince priebus was trying to do it out of -- let's put it this way. i think he did it and he didn't treel eyes what he was doing. >> just inexperience, is that what you're saying? >> yes. >> walk us through what happened at the white house, an extraordinary velt. they were having a press briefing off camera, what they
call a gaggle. and credited white house correspondents almost always are invited to these gaggles, they're alerted usually what's happening in the press secretary's office. i spent seven years as a white house correspondent during the clinton administration so i'm very familiar with this. but all of a sudden certain news organizations reporters were barred from going in. >> that's right, gaggles aren't an abnormal thing for a white house to do. they typically hold an off camera gaggle so they don't step on the president's message of the day when he gives a big speech, as was today when president trump spoke at cpac. but when they called this gaggle, reporters gathered outside, time for the briefing. cnn, new york times, los angeles times, politico, and buzz feed were turned a away. they said they were not on this list of invited attendees. and other outlets, i should point out, that were invited and were allowed into the briefing today were washington times, breitbart news, more conservative outlets which certainly leads to the question of are these outlets being let into these gaggles because of
their coverage, whether it was more favorable or less favorable. of course, this is what you have many white house correspondents veteran white house correspondents saying it is unprecedented and the white house correspondents association today protesting the decision, saying it's wrong to unfairly, you know, leave out people from their -- >> sara murray, our white house correspondent was standing outside the press secretary's office ready to go in with her notebook and all of a sudden she's told, you're not on the list. what explanation are they giving? >> well, they're saying that they had it as a pool. for our viewers out there, that is a group of reporters who will report on behalf of all the white house correspondents. it's usually done because of spacing issues. they had a pool and decided to expand t. they didn't go beyond that, but here's the problem with that. timing is everything. just a few hours earlier you had president donald trump before a big audience at a conservative gathering calling the media the enemy of the press. i'd like to say, one thing john
mccain said recently during a meet the press interview, he said that by doing this, this is how dictators get started. and i think that is something i think a lot of people look at us in the media, you cry a lot about not getting access or you're being attacked. it's not about us, it's really about this is a slippery slope going down. >> let me play for all of you what sean spicer said back in december. he's now the press secretary. what he said about the possibility of barring news organizations at that time. listen to this. >> and i think we have a respect for the press when it come to the government, that that is something that you can't bannon entity from. you know, could be servetive, liberal or otherwise, i think that's what makes a democracy a democracy versus a dictatorship. >> you know, david axelrod, you remember the first four years of the owe bam add a a morgan
stanley, y -- obama administrat. they're saying the obama folks did the same thing to fox nuews that we're doing right now. you're shaking your head. we looked it up. you did at one point say, and i'm quoting you now, fox is not really news. but go ahead. >> well, yes, and there were times when i was troubled by some of the reporting they did, the stories that suggest, for example, that obama was educated in m adr asas, overseas, a story that, by the way, cnn quickly knocked down. those things did trouble me. here's what i didn't do, wolf. when i was working for the white house, i never refused to appear. you know, i was on their "fox news sunday" show on a regular basis. i never suggested that they be banned from gaggles or banned from the white house newsroom. as irritating as i found their reporting at times, i understood that that was beyond the pale. and what we've seen in the last
48 hours expressed by mr. bannon, expressed by the president, is something we haven't seen before. this notion that if you write things we don't like, we're simply going to ban you. and here's the mistake they're making. this is not going to shut reporting down. reporters are going to continue to do their work. they may try and put obstacle in their way, but i don't think that's going to change the nature of the mission of the press, the mission of the media, and it's only going to create more interest and more intense support for the role of the media in the future. >> difficult some checking, david. during the obama administration, you never blocked fox from coming to a briefing, but there were moments when there were round-robin interviews there. was one with ken fine berg, for example, all the major television networks got that interview. fox didn't. the other tv networks complained, eventually fox i think got that interview. you remember that incident? >> yeah, i do remember that. i also remember hearing complaints from various other
news organizations that they went so long without having a sunday interview and so on. news organizations complain. those things happen. but what would never happen during the obama administration was this notion that news organizations were going to be completely cut out of coverage. what never happened was the president of the united states suggesting that any news organization was an enemy of the people because he was displeased with their coverage. this may be raised as cover by this administration, but it is a wholly different situation. you have a president of the united states and his boz well declaring war on the news media, and i think that it will be interesting to see what the public reaction to that is. >> there's more to discuss on this. everyone stand by. we've got to take another quick break. we'll be right back.
when you're close to the people you love, does psoriasis ever get in the way of a touching moment? if you have moderate to severe psoriasis, you can embrace the chance of completely clear skin with taltz. taltz is proven to give you a chance at completely clear skin. with taltz, up to 90% of patients had a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. in fact, 4 out of 10 even achieved completely clear skin. do not use if you are allergic to taltz. before starting you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you are being treated for an infection or have symptoms. or if you have received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz. including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. now's your chance at completely clear skin. just ask your doctor about taltz.
now's your chance at completely clear skin. that $100k is not exactly a fortune. well, a 103 how long did it take you two to save that? a long time. then it's a fortune. i told you we had a fortune. get closer to your investment goals with a conversation. we're back with our political experts. sunlen, listen to what the president said at the cpac conference earlier today. >> they say that we can't criticize their dishonest coverage because of the first amendment. you know they always bring up the first amendment. [ laughter ] and i love the first amendment. nobody loves it better than me. nobody. >> that clip right there is generating a lot of buzz. >> it certainly is because it sounds like president trump is mocking the first amendment here and it struck a lot of people in the moment, but i think it took on some extra meaning after the an ticks of the white house
today from barring certain reporters from their off-camera gag. i was also struck in coupling that, this is a point mark made a few minutes ago, coupling that with the things we heard from his top strategist steve bannon yesterday at the same forum cpac where bannon labeled once again the media the opposition. yet trump today calling the media the enemy. those two certainly sending every signal in the book here that they are ready for a fight, that they are going to continue this antagonistic relationship with the press. >> you know what was encouraging, david, was that once other news organizations who weren't barred heard that cnn, the new york times, the l.a. times and other major news organizations were barred, they decided to boycott, to walk out themselves. other news organizations like "the wall street journal," they stayed in there because they didn't know and now they say they regret participating in that briefing, that so-called gaggle. your reaction to that? >> well, look, i'm an old reporter, wolf. i spent ten years as a reporter. i remember as a city hall bureau
chief once being threatened with expulsion from city hall because the mayor didn't like stories that i had written and there was a ground swell of support for my newspaper and other news organizations and that didn't stand. i think that journalists have to hang together here and, you know, the old saying we're either going to hanging to oral hang separately. they need to stand up for the right of every news organization to do their jobs. and if it becomes the price of admission to write things that please the president of the united states, that's a price too hard -- too high to pay. so, they need to continue to press this issue with the white house. >> do you think he was mocking the first amendment? >> well, i mean, we only have to listen to his own words to know really where he's at. he talks about -- when he's in press conferences he'll point people out and say, oh, he's a good guy, he writes good things about me. oh, that person over there. that person is a bad person. i think he's mocking the whole
syst system if the system doesant work for him. >> it's one thing to block news organizations from getting credentials during a campaign. it's a private operation. but it's another thing to block news organizations when you're working for the u.s. government. >> right. so, we've seen this with the democratic party since 2004 onwards where fox news was blocked out by the democratic party when it came to presidential debates. but to your point that's a campaign. that is a political decision on your part. what we're seeing in this white house right now is a taxpayer owned building with taxpayer owned employees who are making decisions on a free press and that itself is a very scary thing. >> during this campaign, the trump campaign occasionally blocked news organizations including the washington post, for example, they didn't like the reporting. all right, everybody stand by. investigators are now revealing how the brother of the north korean kim jong-un died. how they obtained an internationally banned chemical weapon.
...at t. rowe price... ...we've helped our investors stay confident for over 75 years. call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. with the deduction findingombine superpower of ibm watson? ah! you get more money. that's what you could get. h&r block with watson. get your taxes won. i've got a nice long life ahead. big plans.
so when i found out medicare doesn't pay all my medical expenses, i looked at my options. then i got a medicare supplement insurance plan. [ male announcer ] if you're eligible for medicare, you may know it only covers about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you. call now and find out about an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, it helps pick up some of what medicare doesn't pay. and could save you in out-of-pocket medical costs. to me, relationships matter. i've been with my doctor for 12 years. now i know i'll be able to stick with him. [ male announcer ] with these types of plans, you'll be able to visit any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. plus, there are no networks, and virtually no referrals needed. so don't wait. call now and request this free decision guide
to help you better understand medicare... and which aarp medicare supplement plan might be best for you. there's a wide range to choose from. we love to travel - and there's so much more to see. so we found a plan that can travel with us. anywhere in the country. [ male announcer ] join the millions of people who have already enrolled in the only medicare supplement insurance plans endorsed by aarp, an organization serving the needs of people 50 and over for generations. remember, all medicare supplement insurance plans help cover what medicare doesn't pay. and could save you in out-of-pocket medical costs. call now to request your free decision guide. and learn more about the kinds of plans that will be here for you now - and down the road. i have a lifetime of experience. so i know how important that is.
stunning new information tonight as officials in malaysia say the half brother of kim jong-un was killed by the worst chemical agents, a substance banned around the world. brian todd has been looking into this. >> wolf, the substance is a vx nerve agent. we've been speaking with chemical experts who say just a drop of this material can kill. the people who know about this kpem kal say it is astounding that the attackers used this in a crowded airport terminal. >> reporter: kim jong-nam, half
brother of kim jong-un, was killed by a chemical weapon, vx nerve agent. experts say vx is one of the most potent chemical weapons. >> vx shuts down the enzyme that regulates your nervous system so it goes crazy. which is why you see things like con shvolume shuns. >> reporter: police said when they touched his face the two women who allegedly attacked kim had a toxic substance on their bare hands. >> exposure to a trace, a drop of vx is lethal. there is a couple of possibilities. somehow the vx was encapsulated and placed onto the skin or these women were inoculated with the antidote to the vx. >> both women are still alive
but malaysian police say one of them shows weakness and signs of sickness. and they could be collateral casualties. >> could other people have been harmed. >> yes. absolutely. when you think about how toxic this is, you think how it could have gone. >> reporter: malaysian police are still hunting for four north korean suspects who say trained the women and gave them the chemicals. south korea says the north korea regime ordered the hit on the half brother. north korea has ignored the ban and possesses tons of chemical weapons. tonight a u.s. intelligence official tells cnn north korea has proven it has no regard for human life other than its own leader and it would be no surprise that kim's regime would engage in an assassination. for a man who executed his own uncle, this attack is disturbing. >> i believe he's willing to take risks more than his father. i would like to believe that
there is a red line such as maybe selling nuclear material to terrorist groups, but the fact that he's willing to use chemical weapons in a public airport like this now deeply concerns me. >> reporter: so far north korea has not responded to the report from the malaysian government that a vx nerve agent was used to kill kim jong-nam. but the north koreans have denied carrying out this attack. according to reuters, malaysian officials say they will sweep the airport for any trace of a lethal substance. experts say there could be traces of vx at that airport tonight that could harm people. >> that's a good point. could kim jong-nam possibly have been saved after the attack? >> amazingly enough, wolf, chemical weapons experts say he could be iv saved by a chemical. it can block the effects of vx
but you would have to know that it was used and at that moment in the airport there is no way that the officials could have known that a chemical as powerful as vx was rubbed in his face. brian, thanks very much. >> the white house bars cnn and other key news organizations from a press briefing, and president trump slams the news media, repeating his use of the phrase, enemy of the people. >> it doesn't represent the people, it never will represent the people, and we're going to do something about it. your insurance company
won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, you won't have to worry about replacing your car because you'll get the full value back including depreciation. and if you have more than one liberty mutual policy, you qualify for a multi-policy discount, saving you money on your car and home coverage. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance.
pushing back. the white house strongly defends asking the fbi to deny reports of communications between trump campaign associates and russians known to u.s. intelligence. denied entry, the white house blocks cnn, the "new york times" and other major news organizations from an off-camera press briefing. is it escalating its war on the news media. still campaigning. president trump takes a victory lap at a conservative conference touting his hard line agenda. are republicans united behind him. >> deadly development. the half brother of kim jong-un was killed with a banned chemical agent. who was behind the murder? we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in the "the situation room." we're following new developments in our exclusive reporting. tonight the white house says it did nothing wrong by