tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN June 9, 2017 2:00pm-3:01pm PDT
with senators dianne feinstein and susan collins. i turn you over now to wolf blitzer. he is, as you would expect him to be, in "the situation room." happening now. breaking news. willing to testify. after james comey's incriminating testimony, president trump says he's 100% ready to tell his side of the story under oath. mr. trump accuse comey of being a liar and a leaker and yet also claiming his fired fbi director vindicated him. very near future. the president playing it coy about whether there are tapes of his conversations with comey, promising an answer soon, but tonight house investigators are demanding to vote if any recordings exist, and they are setting a deadline. sessions in trouble. the attorney general is facing escalating cleel and political scrutiny as investigators look
into whether he had a third undisclosed meeting with the russian ambassador. could he be at risk for perjury charges? and winner loses. a federal contractor named realty winner charged with leaking classified material has been denied bail. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in swoom swoom. >> breaking news tonight. president trump says he's 100% ready to be questioned under oath as he and fired fbi director james comey accuse each other of lying. at his first news conference in weeks, the president refused to say if there are any tapes of his conversations with comey that might prove who is telling the truth. tonight leaders on the house intelligence committee, they are trying to force the president's
and. they have asked the white house to and over any recordings if they exist by june 23rd. they are also asking comey to give him his memos on his conversations with the president. also tonight, mr. trump is sending mixed messages about comey's explosive and incriminating testimony, the president claiming comey confirmed there was no collusion or obstruction, something many democrats would dispute and at the same time he accused comey of lying under oath when he testified that mr. trump asked for his loyalty and urged him to let go of his investigation of michael flynn. the trump team strambling to attack comey's credibility. the president and his aides pointsing on comey's admission he sent his memos to a friend who then gave it to the media. mr. trump's outside counsel is now threatening to file a complaint with the justice department inspector general and
the senate judiciary committee. this hour i'll get reaction from democratic senator richard blume-than-that will, a member of the judiciary and armed services committees and then our correspondents, analysts and specialists. they are all standing by. first, let's go to our senior white house correspondent jim acosta. jim, the president remained silent during comey's testimony, but he's letting loose today. >> reporter: he certainly is, wolf. president trump defended himself once again on the russia investigation pointing to former fbi director james comey's testimony as proof that he didn't obstruct the probe or collude with the cremeling, but the president was not so forthcoming on the question of whether he has recordings of his conversations with comey here at the white house. he simply dodged the question where are the tapes? speaking as he tweets in short bursts, president trump tried to have it both ways, clinging to the testimony of former fbi director james comey as his salvation while also slamming the man he fired in the same
breath. >> no collusion, no obstruction. he's a leaker. >> reporter: during a news conference with the romanian president, mr. trump denied he tried to shut down the russia probe, specifically when it comes to national security adviser michael flynn. >> well, i didn't say that. i mean, i will tell you i didn't say that >> reporter: president also rejected the notion that he asked comey for a pledge of loyalty as the former fbi director said in sworn testimony. >> i hardly know the man. i'm not going to say i want you to pledge allegiance. who would do that? who would ask a man to pledge allegiance under oath? i mean, i think of it. i hardly know the man. it doesn't make sense. no, i didn't say that. >> reporter: mr. trump's response when asked whether he would speak under oath on the matter. >> 100%. >> reporter: but the president dug in his heels on the question of whether he has recordings of his conversations with comey and others at the white house. >> i'll tell you about that maybe sometime in the very near future. i'll tell you about it over a very short period of time, okay? okay. do you have a question here? >> when will you tell us?
>> over a fairly short period of time. >> why won't you tell us now, mr. president? >> are there tapes, sir? >> you're going to be very disappointed when you heart answer, don't wory. >> in their response to the comey testimony democrats are eager for the president to tell all he knows under oath with special prosecutor robert mueller. >> i would expect at some point, not right away, but at some point that mr. mueller would feel he has to depose the president. >> reporter: one subject the president was not asked about, his attorney general jeff sessions. the white house has danced around whether the president has confidence in the attorney general, even some republicans say it's time to know more about sessions' interactions with the russians during the campaign. >> we on the the intelligence committee want to know the answers to those questions, and we have begun to request information from the attorney general to allow us to get to the bottom of that. >> reporter: the president was asked by a romanian reporter whether he's committed to nato's article have which would mandate that the u.s. come to the
defense of the alliance's more vulnerable nations on russia's border. >> i'm committing the united states and have committed, but i'm committing the united states to article v, and certainly we are there to protect, and that's one of the reasons that i want people to make sure we have a very, very strong force by paying the kind of money necessary to have that force, but, yes, absolutely, i'd be committed to article v. >> now the president gave no indication as toss when he finally plans to answer the question as to whether he has any recordings of his meetings at the white house. he's off to his golf resort in new jersey right now for the weekend, and, wolf, just as the president was departing the white house, the white house press secretary sean spicer was asked by reporters it is there a timetable for getting an answer to this question about these tapes. spicer told reporters that he does not have a timetable and that they should just watch the helicopter leave the white house. it was another non-answer from the white house. >> all right, jim acosta at the white house, thank you. in the wake of james comey's
testimony more bombshell moments may be ahead with the president talking about testifying under oath and the house intelligence committee trying to get ahold of any white house tapes if they exist. cnn's michelle kosinski is following all the new angles in the investigation for us. michelle, the comey testimony, that was just the beginning. >> reporter: and there was presentee in there to shed a little light, even point to where this investigation could be headed, and this is not only in what he said publicly but also in his closed session he had afterwards with senators. >> the president of the united states. >> reporter: the president says he is willing to testify under oath he did not wrong. >> 100%. >> reporter: it would be an extraordinary step for special investigator robert mueller to investigate and depose the president of the united states about whether he obstructed justice in his conversations with fired fbi director james comey. >> i would expect at some point, not right away, but at some point that mr. mueller would
feel that he has to depose the president. >> reporter: mueller now has comey's detailed memos of his conversations with trump. testifying before congress thursday, comey suggested that the president may now be a target of the investigation. >> i don't think it's for me to say whether the conversation hi with the president was an effort to obstruct are. i took it as a very disturbing thing, very concerning, but that's a conclusion i'm sure the special counsel will work towards to try and understand what the intention was there and whether that's an offense. >> the snowballing effect that happens here is with every single instance and intention by the president of the united states to try to stop or distract the investigation you find additional shoes dropping, additional doors opening and an expansion of an investigation that likely would have been quite narrowly tailored. >> reporter: also emerging from comey's closed door meeting with senators, the possibility that attorney general jeff sessions might have had a third undisclosed meeting with russian ambassador sergey kislyak in
2016. sources tell cnn intercepted communications revealed a discussion of such a meeting among russians. the fbi has not made any conclusions. rating the specter though of possible perjury by sessions. the department of justice today says attorney general sessions has no plans to resign and denies the meeting with kislyak. sessions will publicly face questions from senators on tuesday. trump's son-in-law and key adviser jared kushner will meet with senate intelligence committee staffers soon and former national security adviser michael flynn has now turned over hundreds of pages of documents to congressional investigators. and it may not have been at the forefront lately with everything going on, but there is also still a money question here. what are trump's and his family's financial ties to russia? house democrats have been trying to get alternate. they asked deutsche bank to turn over information to that effect, but now deutsche bank has refused saying turning over information on anyone of that
nature would be a violation of federal privacy rules so that's something else to watch. what other attempts are going to be made to get at that information and in what way? wolf? >> i'm sure there will be many attempts. michelle, thank you very much. michelle kosinski reporting. joining us now is senator richard blumenthal, a democrat on the senate armed services committee and intelligence committee. that the news conference, the comments, recently in your memory, have you ever seen anything like that before? >> never, very astonishing and he's opened the door and i would welcome him to come before the judiciary committee just as the former director comey did and answer questions. he can't simply make a statement and say he's going to call jim comey a liar. he has to come before the committee and -- and answer questions. >> he could do that also at a deposition with the special counsel robert mueller could, call on him to issue a -- make a statement and answer questions under oath. that's another way he could do it. >> and there's no question that
bob mueller will eventually, i believe, request that he do so. is there had a question of intent. what was his purpose in demanding that pledge of loyalty? what was his intent in asking jim comey to drop the investigation and was the firing of jim comey related to comey's refusal to accede to his demands as well as the russia investigation, and part of the pattern here, wolf, is the russian connection. you've seen it in the additional report by cnn about a possible third meeting which would subject jeff sessions to charges of perjury, and you've seen it with kushner and with flynn. in order to the get to the bottom of the obstruction charge there has to be a determination. >> another way to determine who is lying, the president or comey, would be if there are tapes. the house intelligence committee set a deadline of june 23rd for the white house to and over any
recordings of any conversations between comey and the president. do you believe the president did record those conversations or at least some of those conversations? >> i tend to doubt it because one would think that he would have made them available voluntarily, but here's what needs to be done about those tapes. they need to be subpoenaed. even if they don't exist, they need to be subpoenaed in order to establish that they don't exist. authoritatively the house would subpoena them. >> it's just a request. >> the request is not the same as a subpoena. >> what's the delay, why hasn't a house or senate committee subpoenaed those tapes if they exist? >> i have urge that had committee that i sit on, the judiciary committee, subpoena those tapes, and i believe that it is necessary to subpoena the tapes and subpoena documents that may be in the possession of the white house just as jim comey has offered to make those documents available that he did. >> because the president said
he'll have an answer for us shortly and then he looked at the reporters out there and he suggested you're going to be disappointed. i wasn't exactly what he meant, disappointed by what's on those tapes or disappointed that there are no tapes. how did you read that? >> very hard to read it, wolf, because the president is dealing with this very profoundly issue of obstruction of justice and potential collusion with the russians in interfering with our campaign as kind of a reality show. he is playing to an audience, but we're dealing here with issues that affect potentially untruths under oath and he's calling someone else a liar. if he's willing to come forward and give his own testimony under oath, that is to be welcomed with, but he ought to the do it and submit to questions. >> so i assume you agree with your colleague jack reed of rhode island that -- that a mueller -- the special counsel should depoet under oath the president, but what you're suggesting is that house and senate committees call on the president even before such a
deposition to come before congress and testify under oath? >> i think that congressional committees should defer or at least cooperate with bob mueller in his very, very important work to determine whether criminal charges are appropriate, and if he wishes us to delay the president coming before a congressional committee we should defer to his judgment on that score. one way or the or the president should be asked to submit to questions under oath. it the ought to be by bob mueller, if not by congressional committees, but he should in effect be compelled to answer just as jim comey has done in public at some point and under oath because he's called jim comb' liar, and there are documents to support jim comby. >> his own written memoranda that he wrote following those meetings, and his testimony yesterday, comey, was under oath, so if he was lying that's perjury. he could wind up in jail if the president prove or the
president's attorneys prove he's lying. >> there's no excuse for the president to lie under oath. there's no excuse about his being new to the office of president or mistaking what the penalties for perjury are, and he should be compelled to face those same penalties, not just provide a statement and not just provide an affidavit, a statement without questioning, he should answer the tough questions just as jim comey did. >> your senate judiciary committee has asked comey's friend, a professor, a law professor at columbia law school by the name of daniel richmond to and hover that one memo that comey gave him about a conversation he had with the president. do you know if richmond is going to do that? has he already agreed to comply, or you're still waiting for an answer? >> we're still waiting for an answer so far as i know, but jim comey certainly indicated that he would be cooperative. in fact. he urged that the tapes be made available if they exist.
that's very, very important because that cooperation stands in very distinct contrast to the white house and the president who has called this investigation a witch-hunt and apparently has refused cooperation. one more point here, wolf, that i think is very, very important. i think that jeff sessions, the attorney general, and his deputy, rod rosenstein, should come before the judiciary committee as well and answer questions specifically on the reasons why they failed to come to their defense and safeguard the fbi from this intimidation when it occurred. >> now if for some reason professor richmond decides not to and over that -- that memorandum, you would subpoena that memorandum? >> would i -- i would subpoena the complete set of memorandum in any event, and i think jim comey will understand better than anyone having been a prosecutor in this position, the issuance of a subpoena safeguards the process. it means that we're saying to whoever has documents give them all to us. >> will you make that memorandum
public if it's made available to your committee? >> i would urge that it be made available publicly. i think the public has a right to know and we have an obligation to make the public aware as much as we can as much as it's not classified. >> senator, there are other new developments coming into swoom swoom rig -- into "the situation room" right now.
but i love him. i love him, too. so do i. they also know you should get your annual check-up. schedule a checkup with your doctor to learn your four health numbers, and start taking control of your health today. it could save your life. cigna. together, all the way. you didn't know we had over 26,000 local activities listed on our app. or that you could book them right from your phone. a few weeks ago, you still didn't know if you were gonna go. now the only thing you don't know, is why it took you so long to come here. expedia. everything in one place, so you can travel the world better.
the whole country booking on choice hotels.com. four words, badda book. badda boom... let it sink in. shouldn't we say we have the lowest price? nope, badda book. badda boom. have you ever stayed with choice hotels? like at a comfort inn? yep. free waffles, can't go wrong. i like it. promote that guy. get the lowest price on our rooms, guaranteed. when you book direct at choicehotels.com. book now.
we're back with democratic senator richard blumenthal. we're following the breaking news. president trump spoke out for the first time since the testimony of the fbi director he fired. senator, your colleague susan collins, you know her well, she said that comb el himself in early january, the first
exchange, even when the president was president-elect may have inadvertently given the president the idea of having these closed door one-on-one meetings when comey suggested that the other aides leave so that he could basketweave the president on that very slarks dossier. he just wanted to do that privately so the president would know. do you think that argument has merit, that it was comey himself who suggested that these two men meet privately? >> it has to be considered, wolf, in the total pattern and context of their relationship, and -- and for the president to ask everyone to leave when he was going to raise the possibility of either a pledge of loyalty or asking that comey drop the investigation was improper at the very least, and i think that attorney general
sessions bears part of the blame for having left the room. >> here's what i don't understand. if you believe the president's account that the only thing he was going to say is flynn is a good guy, never say walk away from the investigation if he was not going to ask him for a pledge of loyalty, why did all the other officials who were meeting with them earlier, the white house chief of staff, the vice president, why did the president kick him how the. >> that's a question that has to be asked because his wanting to be alone to ask that question in complete privacy is part of the total circumstantial evidence going to intent. what was his motive? and jim comey, in one of the most powerful moments yesterday said he was fired and he was asked to drop that investigation of michael flynn so that the president could change the course of the russia investigation. if that's not an exact quote, that's pretty close. changing the course of the
russia investigation goings to the national security of this country because as jim comey said the russians are coming back against america, and the only way to help protect this country is to deter them by getting to the bottom of how they meddled in this election and whoever colluded with them and holding them accountable and making them pay a price. >> certainly firing comey did not change the course of that russia investigation. he had a short clip. he had a short clip at his news conference today, his takeaway on the comey testimony, listen to this. >> no collusion, no obstruction. he's a leaker. >> he's a leaker. that's a big point, not only he but his attorney, private attorney yesterday, republicans, his supporters, they are making -- you can't believe anything that comby is saying. he's a leaker. >> he was seeking a way to tell his story. certainly not an ideal way but at that point he had no -- he
had only the means to make that document available and try to tell his side of the story and also very, very importantly provide evidence that was needed for a special prosecutor. if you'll recall that was a point at which there was consideration of a special prosecutor. i think he was very supportive of that idea. i had called for it. i voted against rod rosenstein because he failed to commit to a special prosecutor and finally he did. i think that public awareness, public information was a goal that he had, and there was no classified information, the document was his to provide. >> very quickly. you're a former prosecutor. where is all this heading? >> it's headed towards a decision by the special prosecutor who fortunately now is in place, whether there was a violation of criminal law, and it's headed towards pursuing the
evidence, following the facts which rob mueller will do. he is a pro, a prosecutor's prosecutor, and i think that the white house and the president ought to be cooperating with him, not calling this investigation a charade and a witch-hunt. >> senator, thanks so much for joining us. >> thank you. coming up, more on the breaking news. the president's first reaction to james comey's testimony. what kind of hints was he really sending about possible white house recordings and new concerns that the accused leaker, reality winner, may have exposed other government secrets. stay with us. you're in "the situation room." . [ sighs ] hey, i was using that. what, you think we own stock in the electric company? i will turn this car around right now! there's nobody back there. i was becoming my father. [ clears throat ] it's...been an adjustment, but we're making it work. you know, progressive.com makes it easy for us to get the right home insurance. [ snoring ] progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents,
but we can protect your home and auto. [ chuckles ] all right. are upgrading their watere filter to zerowater. start with water that has a lot of dissolved solids... pour it through brita's two-stage filter... dissolved solids remain! what if we filter it over and over? oh dear. thank goodness zerowater's five-stage filter gets to all zeroes the first time. so maybe it's time to upgrade. get more out of your water. get zerowater.
so, if anyone has a reason that these two should not be wed, speak now. (coughs) so sorry. oh no... it's just that your friend daryl here is supposed to be live streaming the wedding and he's not getting any service. i missed, like, the whole thing. what? and i just got an unlimited plan. it's the right plan, wrong network. you see, verizon has the largest, most reliable 4g lte network in america. it's built to work better in cities. tell you what, just use mine. thanks. no problem. all right, let's go live. say hi to everybody who wasn't invited! (vo) when it really, really matters, you need the best network and the best unlimited. plus, get our best smartphones for just $15 a month.
tthat's why at comcast,t to be connected 24/7. we're always working to make our services more reliable. with technology that can update itself. and advanced fiber network infrastructure. new, more reliable equipment for your home. and a new culture built around customer service. it all adds up to our most reliable network ever. one that keeps you connected to what matters most.
this hour's breaking news. president trump declaring he's 100% willing to testify under oath about his conversations with former fbi director james comey, but not answering direct questions about whether tapes of those conversations exist in response to reporters' questions. the president repeatedly contradicted and denied the main points of comey's testimony before the senate intelligence committee. >> ladies and gentlemen, the president of the united states. >> get back to james comey's testimony, you suggested he didn't tell the truth in everything that he said. he did say under oath that you told him to let the flynn -- you said you hoped the flynn investigation -- >> i didn't say that. >> so he lied about that? >> well, i didn't say that, i mean, i will tell you i didn't say that. >> and did he ask you to pledge -- >> and there would be nothing wrong if i did say it according to everybody that i've read today but i did not say that. >> and did he ask for a pledge of loyalty from you? that's another thing he said. >> no, he did not. >> so he said those things under
oath. would you be willing to speak under oath to give your version of events? >> 100%. >> i didn't say under oath. i hardly know the man. i'm not going to say i want you to pledge allegiance. who would do that. who would ask a man to pledge allegiance under oath? i mean, think of it. i hardly know the man. it doesn't make sense. no, i didn't say that, and i didn't say the other. >> if robert mueller wanted to speak to you. >> i'd be glad to tell you just what i told you. >> and you seem to be hinting that there are recordings of those conversations. >> i'm not hinting about anything. i'll tell you about it over a very short period of time. okay. do you have a question here? >> when will you tell us about -- >> over a very short period of time. >> are there tapes, sir? >> you're going to be very disappointed when you hear the answer, don't wory. >> let's bring in our specialists, dana bash. the house intelligence committee has set a deadline for those tapes if in fact they exist, june 23rd. is it time for the trump administration to set the record
straight right now, just let us know. are there tapes or aren't there tapes? >> of course. >> it's absolutely time to set the record straight. it's unclear why the president couldn't just say yes or no, but, look, at the end of the day this is seriously something that now that the house -- the fact that it was even the house and not the senate which has been much more partisan is the one that set a deadline for the white house it is there are such tapes to turn them over. it tells you everything that you need to know. it also does make you wonder why the president was being so mysterious in saying, you know, we'll let you know. is he going to hold another press conference. >> likes a little drama. i don't know if you've noticed. >> yes, i have noticed. i was just thinking of whether or not he's going back to his reality tv days which he wants people to stay tuned which is going to happen no matter what. >> they are clearly staying tuned. you worked for the cia, the fbi a long time.
you understand recording systems. do you believe there are tapes? >> heck no, and i think it's pretty straightforward. we have the president who has portrayed himself from the tough guy, everything from reality tv that we talked about to the presidency. i suspect there are no tapes and now he has to come out and say the tough guy was bluffing. i think this story will end up being simpler in retrospect and the reason he's not that you canning about is because there's nothing there. >> i totally agree, the idea of sort of a nixon taping system is -- is impossible to believe. what is more possible to believe is that he did something that he has known to be done -- to do when he was a businessman which is either take his phone and record it or sort of a and held tape recorder or something else. it doesn't seem as though he did it based on his answer today, but that is not out of the realm of possibility. >> the president is the one who raised the possibility of recordings in that tweet. he used the words tapes. he put the word in quotes. >> he did, although donald trump
in the past has raised other issues that turned out not to be exactly as he initially represented them, wolf, so this might be another such case. it could very well just be donald trump laughing, trying to sound tough, trying to hold something over james comey's head and that seems possible from this point, but if there are thames that could be worse for the president than having to come out and say, well, actually i wasn't being completely truthful in that tweet because the tapes, if they do exist, could be obtained by mueller and probably would be, could be obtained by congress and could come out in the public sphere. >> rebecca is -- there's an issue here that we haven't discussed, if there is a tape, and i don't think there are, but what about the times you might have taped jeff sessions or taped conversations with repeabodius? it's not going to stop if there ever is a tape with a simple conversation with the director of the fbi. >> right, and that was nixon's problem. >> there could be, and why if that is true. potentially there may not be
official white house tapes by white house staffs, whether secret service or others, but there could have just been a little, you know. >> and there's still presidential records. i mean, that's the thing. the white house has already clarified that even his tweets sent from his personal twitter account are presidential statements. they are official records of the president, so no matter where he taped them, if he did tape them, they are things he has to preserve, and if somehow they got erased or destroyed in any way, then that is a big, big possible. >> what are the chances that the special counsel bob mueller deposed the president under oath? >> i would say pretty close to 100% which is why the president's comment today saying i'm willing to do this is humorous. it's like me willing to say i'm willing to file my irs tax return this year if i really have to. the president is out there because he knows if there's an investigation of the presidential campaign that includes suggestions that members of the campaign directed potentially by the president colluded with the russians, how do you finish up that investigation without talking to
the president of the united states? ? >> i do wonder though whether the statement he made at that podium was actually coordinated with his lawyers. i'm not sure. >> well, that's interesting, because i -- you're thinking of it as a legal matter, as an verdictive matter. i'm thinking of it as a political matter because he's saying politically, 100%, i'll put my word up against his to say politically this guy is not telling the truth. believe me, american people, and i'm so sure of myself that i'm willing to do it under oath. >> and now we're already seeing democrats make this request. okay. if you're 100% ready to testify under oath, we're ready to host you on capitol hill. >> the president himself sailed that. all right. everybody stand by. there's much more happening. we'll take a quick break. we'll resume our coverage right after this.
do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas® for pulmonary hypertension, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have a sudden decrease or loss of hearing or vision, or an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis.
and get medical help right away. there are the wildcats 'til we die weekenders. the watch me let if fly. this i gotta try weekenders. then we've got the bendy... ... spendy weekenders. the tranquility awaits. hanging with our mates weekenders and the it's been quite a day... ...so glad we got away weekenders. whatever kind of weekender you are, there's a hilton for you. book your weekend break direct at hilton.com and join the weekenders.
we're back with our correspondents and specialists. moments ago president trump arrived at the newark airport. you're looking at pictures where he took a helicopter to his golf course in new jersey. by the way, this will be his 17th weekend since his inauguration that the president has visited a property bearing his name. this weekend the trump national golf club in bed minister, new jersey. the president walking over to make that connection, walking down air force one, and then he'll be heading over to bed
minister, new jersey. likes to wave as he's walking over to marine one to take a short little helicopter ride. you know, evan, the fbi, the former fbi director comey testified yesterday that he shared that memo of that conversation he had with the president with a friend of his, professor at columbia university law school because he said, quote, i thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel. that friend was told share the information with a journalist which, of course, the friend did. was that appropriate? >> it's strange. i mean, i think this is the kind of thing that if any other fbi employee did i think it would be probably a fireable offense, but, look, i mean, this is something beyond strange now. the former fbi director was dealing with a president that he believed was acting inappropriately so he -- >> but he's a private citizen now. >> he's a private citizen and he's sharing notes that he took -- a lot of people are saying, well, these are still
official government records and you needed to leave them there and not give them to someone else. i think he felt like these were extraordinary circumstances and he needed to take these measures. >> what did you think? >> i thought the way he did it was odd. i would have said in public i am giving these to someone to pass to the media. i don't want to talk to the media myself. you'll see it tomorrow. the fact that he did it i don't think is surprising. he knew months ago he had minefields. by the way, one quick comment. if anyone talks about investigation on this, it's an unclassified document. right. we investigate when something is classified. this is odd, but it's not against the law. >> you know, a lot of officials, current officials, former officials, dana as you and i know well, they leak to the news media. this the was extraordinary because he acknowledged this. he spoke about it under oath. >> he wanted the president of the united states to hear that he got outmaneuvered from the perspective of james comey, that james comey saw the threat, what he perceived as a threat in the tweet that the president sent saying you better hope i don't
have tapes and said, okay. you want to play that game. i'll play that game. here we go. and so that was -- so much of this is -- is a human drama between two big egos. at the end of the day you can't underestimate that that is a big part of what's going hon here >> you know what, look, it does play into the line, the white house -- the president have been complaining about leaks and they are going to use this. >> totally played into that. >> no leaks, that contemporaneous memo could be significant. >> it's a very important piece of information and against what's going to be just the president's words if there are no tapes, we don't suspect he would have notes necessarily. >> high levels of the fbi who he briefed so those people are also witnesses. >> and he mention that had his chief of staff was on his end of the line for one of these phone calls. james comey has left a trail of
bread krump breadcrumbs for this investigation and he's covered all the bases in a way the president not been in this position before, not being a career investigator. >> a lot more on the breaking news coming up. what will president trump tell congressional investigators who are demanding any tapes of his conversations with the former fbi director? also, explosive new allegations against the nsa contractor accused of leaking a highly classified document. did she mishandle other national secrets?
scalpel. i have no idea what i'm doing. i'm just a tv doctor. i never went to college. (scream) i don't do blood. but now, thanks to cigna, i can do more than just look the part. is that a foot? we are the tv doctors of america. and we're partnering with cigna to help save lives. by getting you to a real doctor for an annual check-up. so go, know, and take control of your health. doctor poses. cigntogether, all the way.
are upgrading their watere filter to zerowater. start with water that has a lot of dissolved solids... pour it through brita's two-stage filter... dissolved solids remain! what if we filter it over and over? oh dear. thank goodness zerowater's five-stage filter gets to all zeroes the first time. so maybe it's time to upgrade. get more out of your water. get zerowater.
i decided to see if there was a way for design to play a... ...positive role in what was going on in the world. there's a jacket that's reflective for visibility... ...a sleeping bag jacket, jackets that turn into tents. i usually do my fashion sketches on the computer. i love drawing on the screen. there's no lag time at all. it feels just like my markers. with fashion, you can dress people and help people. it's really cool to see your work come to life.
trump's news conference. also, new details about reality winner. the contractor abuse accused of leaking information from the 2017 election. prosecutors believe she may have exposed other secrets as well? >> they think that's a possibility because of a recorded conversation between reality winner and her mother where the defendant allegedly indicates she may have more than one document. tonight we have startling details from prosecutors and disturbing information about possible warning signs missed. wearing an orange jump suit with the word "inmate" on the back, reality winner appeared outside in shackles and handcuffs. inside. winner told a judge she was not guilty of charges she stole classified documents about russian hacking from a a government contractor inside georgia's fort gordon and gave them to an on-line news outlet.
but prosecutors repeal explosive new details of what they suggest is an intentional plan by the 25-year-old to leak to the media. prosecutor told winner wrote, quote, i want to burn the white house down and she had a strong desire to travel to pakistan and meet the taliban. last november while on active duty with the air force she once used a work computer to search the phrase do top secret computers detect when flash drives are inserted. prosecutors say she was denied access to some air force computers of that. >> should somebody later on have caught that? >> yes. i this that i when you're looking at someone, especially looking to employ someone, and looking to employ someone for a critical area of importance like a top secret security clearance, you have to look at everything that happened in their history and decide over time whether this person has changed. >> prosecutors have previously claim claim claimed winner tweeted was an orange fascist and followed
wic wikileaks and snowden on twitter. in a jailhouse phone call she allegedly referred to documents plural. in recorded phone conversations reality winner told her family of a courtroom strategy she had. quote, i'm going to play the pretty white cute card and prosecutors say she told her mother to tell the media she feared for her life, quote, you've got to play that angle. >> it also shows that she's got some manipulative sense that she thinks she can play this role. and maybe she is looking at the chelsea manning case and saying, this is a leak wloer was pardoned, maybe can i fit into the same world. >> winner's lawyer said his client is not a traitor and he has seen no evidence from prosecutors that proves she leaked anything. her mother and stepfather continue to defend her, including on cnn. >> she served her country. she is a veteran within the united states air force. she served with distinction for six years. she is a patriot. >> as winner is behind bars some
are questioning the agency with the word security in its name after giant theft of classified material of edward snowden and harold martin. >> that's the biggest problem that nsa have. people are vetted, finding nothing wrong with them. after they get there, they become disgruntled, dissatisfied, think the public ought to know this information and they turn rogue and do it. >> now just how did reality winner get and keep her top secret security clearance? near pluribis international nor nsa would comment. but there are agreements in place for government employees with top secret security clear uns to go from one government agency to another and take clearances with them, sometimes without being checked. wolf? >> interesting. brian, how account nsa and other agencies stop this leaking by people with top secret clearances? >> wolf, security experts tell us the nsa and other agencies
have to do a better job vetting people's social media and other signals that indicate things about their judgment before giving them top security and, psychological issues and see if anything might have changed in their lives since their employment. >> brian todd, thanks very much. coming up, more on president trump's remarkable and defiant news conference, insisting he has been vindicated by james comey's testimony on capitol hill. >> no collusion. no obstruction. he's a leaker. is data that can make the difference between winning and losing. the microsoft cloud helps the pga tour turn countless points of data into insights that transform their business and will enhance the game for players and fans. the microsoft cloud turns
information into insight. so, if anyone has a reason that these two should not be wed, speak now. (coughs) so sorry. oh no... it's just that your friend daryl here is supposed to be live streaming the wedding and he's not getting any service. i missed, like, the whole thing. what? and i just got an unlimited plan. it's the right plan, wrong network. you see, verizon has the largest, most reliable 4g lte network in america. it's built to work better in cities. tell you what, just use mine. thanks. no problem. all right, let's go live. say hi to everybody who wasn't invited! (vo) when it really, really matters, you need the best network and the best unlimited.
the future isn't silver suits anit's right now.s, think about it. we can push buttons and make cars appear out of thin air. find love anywhere. he's cute. and buy things from, well, everywhere. how? because our phones have evolved. so isn't it time our networks did too? introducing america's largest, most reliable 4g lte combined with the most wifi hotspots. it's a new kind of network. xfinity mobile.
happening now. breaking news. 100%, they've called each other liars. now trump says he is 100% willing to answer questions under oath about his conversations with fired fbi director james comey. i didn't say that, president trump denies asking comey for his loyalty and asking him to drop the investigation into michael flynn. the president won't confirm there are recordings of their conversations but says he will reveal that soon. he's a leaker, after claiming vindication from comey's testimony. the president sums it up by saying no collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker. but comey's memos are in the hands of special counsel and house committee along with copy answers any white house recordings. and mixed messages. rex tillerson calling on arab allies to end the blockade of