Skip to main content

tv   Anderson Cooper 360  CNN  June 22, 2017 6:00pm-7:01pm PDT

6:00 pm
the breaking news tonight after nearly a month and a half of half answers, nonanswers that began with a thinly veiled threat. now we know. we know that when it comes to recordings of conversations with fbi director james comey, recordings that might have con firped the president's claim that he never asked comey to squash an investigation or might have backed up the director, that he was bluffing. was the most powerful human
6:01 pm
being on the planet having fun at the expense? >> reporter: when president trump said, james comey better hope that there are no tapes of our conversation" he waited over 59,000 minutes, 341 days, nearl six weeks to declare, quote, i did not make and do not have any such recordings. the president was asked early on about his claims. >> i won't talk about that. all i want is for comey to be honest and i hope he will be and i'm sure he will, i hope. >> reporter: no elaboration from the president about why he wouldn't or couldn't talk about it. and then weeks later in the rose garden -- >> do tapes exist of your conversation? >> yeah. well, i'll talk about that sometime in the very near future. you're going to be disappointed, don't worry. >> reporter: not clear what the president meant about his disappointment comment.
6:02 pm
his staff did nothing to clear up the matter. this from white house press secretary sean spicer on the day of the original tweet. >> i assume you're referring to the tweet. and i've talked to the president and the president has nothing further to add on that. >> reporter: this from three days later. >> the president has nothing further on that. i've answered the question over and over again the same way. >> reporter: and this interest deputy white house press secretary sarah huckabee sanders this month. >> could you try to find out? a lot of people are interested, as you might imagine. >> sure, i'll try to look under the couches. >> reporter: when james comey testified before congress, he tried to emphasize his own credibility by saying -- >> lordy, i hope there are tapes. >> reporter: but there appears that there are not. gary tuchman, cnn, atlanta. >> no reaction from james comey. joining me now is my panel. i want to reread the president's tweets on this. "with all of the recently reported electronics surveillance intercepts
6:03 pm
unmasking illegal leaking of information, i have no idea whether there are tapes or recordings of my conversation with james comey but i did not make and do not have any such recordings. gloria, why 41 days for all of this to get to the point where we are right now s? >> the most benign interpretation is that congress gave him a deadline of tomorrow and so he had to meet that deadline. but i think it took 41 days because he was pulling the country's leg on this and a lot of people don't think it's funny, anderson. you have to be able to believe a president and i think what he was doing, the white house spin on it was that he wanted to ensure that comey was telling the truth but if you're now the special counsel mueller, i think, and there are legal people here who know more than i do, i'm wondering whether you have to start looking at it of whether he was trying to in fact intimidate comey in one way or
6:04 pm
another. >> scott, i'm wondering, how do you see it? gloria is saying that the country didn't find it funny. what do you think was behind this? >> well, i don't know what was behind it. i regret the credibility damage that's going to be done to the president, even if it is short term. i think it's clear -- >> you think there is credibility damage? >> i think in the short term, yes. i don't think this is a long-term problem, necessarily, for credibility. but in the short term, absolutely. i think he sent a pretty clear message, anderson, several days ago when he said we would all be disappointed with the answer. he was signaling there would be no tapes. as a former white house staffer, i am relieved there are no tapes and glad he put out that there are no tapes because i think the president of the united states needs to be able to get the most candid advice he can get from his advisers and people that walk into the oval office. if there was a taping system, he would not get candid, unvarnished advice. he needs it. so operationally this is a good thing for the white house.
6:05 pm
>> bakari? do you see this -- jeff raised the point that this is, in many ways, a diversion from a huge story today on what the senate bill is on health care and we'll talk to bernie sanders and others about it in just a moment. how do you see this? >> this isn't that calculated. and i'm surprised that they were all stunned that donald trump lied to us. the fact of the matter is that donald trump has lied to this country, he's lied to us throughout the campaign. the original lie started with the 3 to 5 million voters that voted illegally. we can talk about the birther movement and barack obama. the list goes on and on and on and so i'm not -- i don't think anybody believed that there were tapes in there. but even more importantly, i think scott hit the nail on the head. we have a president of the united states who has a credibility deficit. that not only hurts us domestically but the rest of the world is laughing at us and we do not have the seriousness in the white house. not only that, you have people who work for you. i actually feel sorry for people
6:06 pm
like sarah huckabee sanders and sean spicer who have to twist in the wind and find themselves in pretzels because their boss lies and they have to clean it up. >> ken? >> well, certainly when you've got the kind of tweet power the president demonstrated in the election and to great success in the election, it's just not something he's been able to leave behind and i don't think it's helped him since the election in the way that it did in the election. this is another example. i don't agree with gloria that now mueller has to go back and look at the original tweet. there is no reason to think that the president was doing anything much more than pulling -- whether you call it the country's leg or comey's leg and his comments on the news story not too long after that about, well, i hope comey tells the truth. i'm sure he'll tell the truth. well, i hope. that kind of language certainly was intended, i think, by the president to make sure that comey told the truth.
6:07 pm
most of the rest of the country has less doubts about comey telling the truth than the president does, though there were some inconsist steencies o the last couple of months. i think it hurts his credibility but i don't think it's as long lasting as scott said and the fa fact that it came out today, the same day as the lousy bill from the senate, that's pure coincidence. the fact that the deadline was tomorrow for the house matters a great deal more. >> jeff, you know, i certainly agree what ken said about how the president -- the candidate used twitter to great effect during the campaign. every attorney has said this, alan dershowitz has said this. every attorney we've had on has said, i would advise the president to stop doing this. the president has very good attorneys, personal attorneys, and jay sekulow being the latest
6:08 pm
one. they seem unwilling in stopping him. >> he's the client. he's in charge. the client does what he wants. lawyers can only give advice. and donald trump, big television watcher, saw us night after night during the campaign saying, oh, it's all over. you know, the "access hollywood" tape, john mccain, megyn kelly, he was right and we were wrong and he won. i think he has an understanding of communication with the public that is better than his advisers, better than his lawyers. it certainly doesn't make a lot of sense to me. but the truth is, every man and woman are talking about this. we're going to talk about health care later in the program but was it calculated to distract attention? it beats the hell out of me. i do not know.
6:09 pm
>> as a presidential historian, presidents have often felt cut off. donald trump is certainly someone who likes that interaction with people in large auditoriums, not necessarily one on one but in large crowds and twitter allows him, as we've said before, to communicate directly. >> well, obviously there's no problem with twitter. the problem is with donald trump's misuse of twitter, where he's constantly hijacking public policy and twisting things. i mean, this whole idea that he had tapes, we all knew there weren't going to be tapes. however, he did eat up 41 days of the national clock. we do have soldiers serving in places like afghanistan that have been dying. it creates a circus environment, muddies the water and i think he feels that it's advantageous to him but in the long run, it's the low ebb of presidential history when you have a president that's so untrustworthy that any time he sends a tweet, people think it's
6:10 pm
still with conspiracy theories and that's what today was. in the end he said, maybe there was something, maybe there was a bug in the room that barack obama left or something. >> you know, one of the things that we have to point out is that throughout the campaign trail, even today, the reason that donald trump lies and gets to the point where it's repetitive, where it's a pattern, some of you may say it's pathological, is because he can do so without repurchase discussion. every time he has a lie, whether it's the birther movement, the list goes on and on, or the wiretaps that barack obama did in trump tower, he does so without any repercussion. until paul ryan or mitch mcconnell or some republican with some gravitas says you are eroding the credibility of the greatest nation in the world, he'll keep going. he's like a child that if you don't punish them, they'll keep going back into the bad behavior
6:11 pm
pattern. >> he has become considerably unpopular by presidential standards. that's a consequence of, you know, his behavior as president. so, you know, yes, it's true, he hasn't been impeached and i don't think he's going to be impeached but i think there's been some cost to him. >> but that's a cost to him and maybe his standing in the historic historical lore. but i'm talking about someone putting a stopping this. >> how do past presidents get out of the bubble? >> they get out of washington as much as possible. fdr would get out of town unreached by the press. he traveled to the galipitus for 24 days and no one knew where he was. but times have changed and it is a glass house now. people are following the president wherever he goes. but he seems, in my mind, to do
6:12 pm
a little better when he goes to mar-a-lago and goes to europe, goes on campaigning like he did in iowa. when he's in d.c., he's watching too much television and he's responding in a gutt taral way but it's hurting him and the republicans know it is but he doesn't want to listen to anybody because he does things his way. >> anderson, what republicans are doing now is one by one they're trying to say i don't comment on the president's tweets. >> right. i asked mitch mcconnell that last week and that's what he said. >> exactly. mitch mcconnell, john mccain. but sometimes it gets almost impossible because the president is tweeting on just about everything and we saw that today and i think what we're beginning to see, today he tweeted on the tapes. he tweeted on the wall he's going to build with solar
6:13 pm
panels. he tweeted on health care. and what we're seeing, as the press briefings go off camera, we're seeing the president become his own spokesman more and more and more and that's kind of dangerous. >> yeah. >> because these tweets can get a little out of control. >> all right. we've got to end it there. thank you, everyone. coming up next, the wraps come off the senate health care bill and we'll hear from bernie sanders when we come back. and later, from a republican member of congress who supports what's going on in the senate. tonight, a cnn exclusive with two of the country's top intelligence officials said behind closed doors about the president leaning on them about trying to get a message out that there was no collusion with russia.
6:14 pm
...where each drop was formulated to be smarter....
6:15 pm
...even smarter than that... if a color didn't go on evenly, it would balance itself out to reveal its truest, richest state. if a paint could realize the fullest potential of any color... have to wonder... is it still paint? aura interior from benjamin moo®e . only available at independently owned paint and hardware stores. i was thinking around 70. to and before that?re? you mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? i'd really like to run with the bulls. wow. hope you're fast. i am. get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change with investment management services. previously treated withd platinum-based chemotherapy, including those with an abnormal alk or egfr gene who've tried an fda-approved targeted therapy, here's a question: who wouldn't want a chance for another...? who'd say no to a...? who wouldn't want... a chance to live longer.
6:16 pm
opdivo (nivolumab). opdivo demonstrated longer life versus chemotherapy. over 40,000 of these patients have been prescribed opdivo. opdivo works with your immune system. opdivo can cause your immune system to attack normal organs and tissues in your body and affect how they work. this may happen any time during or after treatment has ended, and may become serious and lead to death. see your doctor right away if you experience new or worsening cough; chest pain; shortness of breath; diarrhea; severe stomach pain or tenderness; severe nausea or vomiting; extreme fatigue; constipation; excessive thirst or urine; swollen ankles; loss of appetite; rash; itching; headache; confusion; hallucinations; muscle or joint pain; flushing; fever; or weakness, as this may keep these problems from becoming more serious. these are not all the possible side effects of opdivo. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions, including immune system problems, or if you've had an organ transplant, or lung, breathing, or liver problems. because who wouldn't want...that?
6:17 pm
ask your doctor about opdivo. see for this and other indications. bristol-myers squibb thanks the patients, nurses, and physicians involved in opdivo clinical trials. when heartburn hits fight back fast with new tums chewy bites. fast relief in every bite. crunchy outside. chewy inside. tum tum tum tum new tums chewy bites. the president weighed in on the what he privately called the house version whistle greated all the same. as for this one, which differs slightly from the house proposal, he tweeted this. "i am very supportive of the senate health care bill. look forward to making it really special. remember, obamacare is dead." in a moment, we'll talk to bernie sanders who has his take on the draft. first, cnn's ryan nobles on capitol hill.
6:18 pm
>> reporter: within hours of senate republicans releasing their health care bill, four members announcing they currently oppose the plan as leaders make the case for it is passage. >> there will be ample time to analyze, discuss and provide thoughts before legislation comes to the floor and i hope every senator takes that opportunity. >> reporter: republicans can only lose two votes and still pass the bill. but as it stands now, rand paul, ted cruz, mike lee and ron johnson say they can't support the bill in its current form but are, quote, open to negotiation. >> the intention is not to take down the bill. the intention is to make the bill better. >> reporter: a pair of moderate gop senators, susan collins and dean heller both voice concerns. this allows states to waive the mandate on essential health benefits which may not cover pre-existing conditions. it also slows rollback of the obama medicaid expansion included in the house bill delaying the start of that process until 2021.
6:19 pm
the senate verse puts back in obama subsidies for premiums eliminated from the house bill but drops the threshold from 400% of poverty to 3508%. it also maintains a one-year block on funds for planned parenthood. >> the senate republican health care bill is a wolf in sheep's clothing. >> reporter: minority leader chuck schumer labeled it meaner. schumer arguing that this plan may be worse than the original. >> this is a nasty bill. and they're trying to cover it up with little things here and there. >> reporter: the white house has kept its distance in this process but today indicated it plans to play a role in house senate talks. this morning, the president reacted to the senate draft positively. >> little negotiation but it's going to be great. >> reporter: but there will be little time for that negotiation. house majority leader mitch
6:20 pm
mcconnell has sent a goal of voting on the bill by the fourth of july holiday. >> ryan joins us right now. what was the reaction for members of the house on this bill? >> reporter: anderson, for the most part, house republicans have steered clear of any comment because they want to allow their colleagues here on the senate side to do their work without any interference but their opinion is important because if this bill makes it out of the senate and right now that is a big if, it will have to go back to the house to be passed once again before it heads to the president's desk and this morning house speaker paul ryan said he hadn't read the bill in its entirety but he had been briefed on it and in his view there were no real concerns that would prevent it from being passed in the house. >> ryan nobles, thanks very much. we'll talk to a house republican later on in the broadcast who was instrumental in passing the republican version in the house. we'll get his take on the senate version. unlike the senate, conservatives for former presidential candidate bernie sanders is coming at the bill from the left and from the ground in some politically key states. he'll be headlining a bus tour
6:21 pm
this weekend making stops in pennsylvania, ohio, west virginia, challenging the proposed legislation and urging senators from those states to save the affordable care act. senator sanders joins us right now from burlington, vermont. thank you for being here. >> good to be with you. >> you call this the most harmful piece of legislation you've seen in your statement. that's an extraordinary statement. >> you're right. it's an extraordinary statement because this is an extraordinary piece of legislation. if you throw 23 million people off of health insurance, if you cut medicaid by over 800 bill$8 billion, there is no question but that thousands of americans will die. if you are sick, if you have a chronic illness and you can't get the kind of care you need, you die. or maybe you will just suffer year after year after year. and the purpose of this whole legislation of raising premiums for older workers, of defunding
6:22 pm
planned parenthood that 2.5 million women use, the whole purpose is to provide $500 billion in tax breaks for the top 2% for the insurance companies, for the drug companies and other major corporations. this is barbarbarbaric. this is what oligarchy is all about. we need more tax breaks despite we're doing fen nphenomenonly w and if it means telling a 63-year-old worker that his premiums are going to soar, that's not our problem. we're just billionaires now. we need even more tax breaks. this is barbaric and the worst piece of legislation z what the republicans are saying a he what the president has said as well, obamacare is dead, that it's collapsing under its own weight.
6:23 pm
you know all of these expressions that they've been using and that this basically something has to be done and this is -- this will actually help more people. >> but anderson, if you talk to -- and these are not my best friends, but if you talk to the insurance industry, what they will tell you is that trump and the republican leadership are sabotaging the affordable care act by dealing -- by not putting funding into cost sharing or destabilizing that situation and also not enforcing the individual mandate. so money is not coming in. the insurance companies are totally unsure about the future and they're raising rates. but let me say this. nobody denies that the affordable care act has problems. nobody denies that premiums are too high, that the deductibles and co-payments are too high and, by the way, that is why i in the near future will be introducing legislation called medicare for all.
6:24 pm
guaranteeing health care to every man, woman and child and doing what every other major country on earth is doing. but short term, short term, we have to improve the affordable care act. you don't improve the affordable care act by throwing 23 million people off of insurance, including children. children with disabilities, kids who are now getting help in school are going to lose that. what kind of country do the republican leadership think we are where they are attempting to bring about this type of legislation? beyond my comprehension. >> on the campaign trail, then candidate trump said medicare, medicaid, not going to touch those things. he's not going to lessen those things. this basically sends a lot of power over to the states and every analysis i've looked at, it looks like medicaid is going to be cut. >> well, there's no debate about that, anderson. at least in the house bill. we don't have a cbo report in
6:25 pm
the senate but in the house it's over a period of time it will be even more than that. now, trump during the campaign -- and i hope people who voted for him remember what he said. he said, we're going to guarantee health care to everybody. everybody's going to get great health care. great health care. throwing 23 million people off of health insurance is not great health care. and by the way, trump also talked a lot about taking on the drug companies and lowering prescription drug costs. there's nothing in this legislation that begins to do that. >> the question, of course, just from a strategic standpoint is, what can you do about it? republicans control both houses. >> well, i am going to do everything i can and i know there are people all over this country who are standing up and are fighting back and i'll be on the phone and e-mail and do everything that i can to tell the republican representatives, the republican senators, do not vote for this barbaric piece of
6:26 pm
legislation which would hurt so many people in this country. i'm going to be in pennsylvania, ohio and west virginia over the weekend just explaining what this legislation is about. there's going to be rallies all over this country. there's going to be town meetings all over this country. you know, anderson, i don't care what your political view is. i don't think there are many americans who think that we give unbelievably large tax breaks to billionaires and then tell disabled kids or people who are in nursing homes today because of medicaid that we're going to punish them. punish them to give tax breaks to billionaires. man, that is not what this country is supposed to be about. >> one of the things also that the candidate trump talked about on the campaign trail was the opioid crisis. he said he saw firsthand in new hampshire and in other states the price that people were paying and he talked about it passionately on the campaign trail. does -- do any of these plans
6:27 pm
really deal with this? because my understanding so far of what i've seen of the senate plan, it actually earmarks money for a shorter period of time than the house plan does. >> we have -- and again, when trump said on the campaign trail is one thing, but i think most americans now understand what he said on the campaign trail has nothing to do with the proposals that he's bringing forthright now. he campaigned as a champion of the working class. this is the most anti-working class legislation that i've ever seen. in terms of the opioid crisis, you're right, it's not just new hampshire, it's vermont, west virginia, it's all over this country. if you make devastating cuts to medicaid, you're going to make it much, much harder for people to get the treatment that they need. and i believe there are police chiefs throughout this country who understand what this epidemic is about or in
6:28 pm
opposition to these terrible cuts in medicaid in terms of what it will mean for opioid treatment. >> senator sanders, we have to take a quick break. we'll have to ask you more questions when we come back in a few minutes. we're going to also talk a little bit on the state of democratic party as the 2018 election gets closer. more up ahead.
6:29 pm
at lincoln financial, we get there are some responsibilities of love you gotta do on your own. and some you shouldn't have to shoulder alone. like ensuring your family is protected, today and tomorrow, no matter what the future brings. ask a financial advisor how life insurance from lincoln can help start protecting your family's financial future now.
6:30 pm
6:31 pm
the it's right now.lver suites and houses on mars. think about it. we can push buttons and make cars appear out of thin air. and find love anywhere. he's cute. how? because our phones have evolved. so isn't it time our networks did too? introducing a new kind of network. america's largest most reliable 4g lte and the most wi-fi hotspots. call or click to take advantage of a limited time offer. xfinity mobile. we've been talking with senator bernie sanders about the senate gop health care bill. right now i want to turn to the democratic party. obviously the whole debate over health care shows the debate over democrats to at least retake the house, if possible.
6:32 pm
this week, we saw the democrats fall short in the election in georgia, the fourth contest since the president was elected that the democrats have lost. why can't the party win a race? >> first of all, anderson, i think it's important to put those contests into a context. and the context is, all of them are republican seats. and trump did, in most of those seats, did very, very well and, in fact, as i understand it, democrats did much better than was the case in the last election. so i think when most objective observers feel is democrats actually have the momentum. maybe not enough momentum right now to win in heavy republican districts but having said that, it is my view that the democratic party has to do a lot of internal soul searching and understand that for the last ten years, the model that they have had really has not worked. it doesn't work when you lose the u.s. senate, u.s. house, the white house, when two-thirds --
6:33 pm
almost two-thirds of governor chairs are held by republicans. i think what the democrats have got to do is make it clear to the working people of this country that they are, the democratic party is on their side, is prepared to take on wall street, the pharmaceutical industry, the insurance company, the fossil fuel industry to create the many millions of jobs that we can create by rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure by, in fact, passing a medicare for all single-payer system. anderson, we are the only major country on earth not to guarantee health care to all people and we've got to do that. we have got to raise the minimum wage to a living page. 15 bucks an hour. pay equity for women. trump is wrong when he thinks that climate change is a hoax. it is a very dangerous reality. we've got to transform our energy. the bottom line is, i think the
6:34 pm
democrats need a progressive agenda. they need to rebuild the party in states that they have ignored for decades where they have almost no presence right now and create a 50-state party. >> democratic congressman tim ryan said the other day, "our brand is worse than trump." is he right? is the democratic brand -- >> he may be. look, i speak as the longest serving independent in american congressional history. the democratic brand is pretty bad. i think the trump brand is also pretty bad. as is the republican brand. that's why so many people are giving up on politics. they are looking at washington and what the average american says, i'm in a lot of pain. my kid can't afford to go to college. i'm making 10 bucks an hour. what are you going to do for me? and they don't hear much coming out of washington. so i think -- >> they are focusing a lot on president trump, running -- everyone knows that they are against president trump. i'm not sure people know what they are for. >> well, that's a good point.
6:35 pm
and i know that many of us are trying to deal just with that very valid point that you're making and what we are for is to raise the minimum wage to a living wage, to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, a trillion dollar investment would create up to 13 million good-paying jobs, to transform our energy system away from fossil fuel and to sustainable energy and when we do that, we create millions of jobs and make public universities free. our kids need higher education whether through college or vocational schools in order to get the good jobs that are out there and we have got to tell the billionaire class, who are doing phenomenonly well, we've got to say, you know what, yes, sir, you're going to have to start paying your fair share of taxes so our kids will have the opportunity to get the education that they need. you can't get it all just because you're a billionaire.
6:36 pm
>> this is a dumb question but are you looking at 2020 as a possible candidate? >> you know, anderson, again, this is not really i think where the american people are at right now. they are tired of -- you know, in the uk, the uk had an election, i think it was six weeks and two months. they elected an entire parliament, prime minister. and we have never-ending elections. the american people want us to deal with the crises that they face right now today. create the millions of jobs, raise wages, deal with climate change, deal with pay equity, make sure our kids can afford to go to college. they're not really interested in who is going to be running for president three years from now. >> senator sanders, always good to talk to you. thank you. >> thank you very much. coming up next, did the president try to get two of his intelligence chiefs to say nice things about the russia probe, that there was no collusion? they wouldn't say in public testimony but we've learned what they've told senators behind closed doors. a cnn exclusive when we
6:37 pm
continue. of course he was strong... ...intelligent. ...explosive. but the true secret to his perfection... was a heart, twice the size of an average horse. so you miss the big city? i don't miss much... definitely not the traffic. excuse me, doctor... the genomic data came in. thank you. you can do that kind of analysis? yeah, watson. i can quickly analyze millions of clinical and scientific reports to help you tailor treatment options for the patient's genomic profile. you can do that? even way out here? yes. even way out here.
6:38 pm
even way out here? ray's always been different. last year, he said he was going to dig a hole to china. at&t is working with farmers to improve irrigation techniques. remote moisture sensors use a reliable network to tell them when and where to water. so that farmers like ray can compete in big ways. china. oh ... he got there. that's the power of and. ♪
6:39 pm
♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
6:40 pm
it's easy-drinking... it's refreshing... ♪ if you've got the time ♪ it's what american lager was born to be. ♪ we've got the beer. ♪ welcome to the high life. ♪ miller beer. cnn exclusive tonight on the russia investigation. two of the nation's top intelligence officials told investigators the president suggested they say publicly there was no collusion between the campaign and moscow, that's
6:41 pm
according to multiple sources. the question is, did the president try to obstruct the investigation? michelle kosinski joins us with the latest. what do we know what about the president allegedly asked his intelligence chiefs? >> both of them, dan coats and nsa director admiral mike rogers testified publicly in june and didn't say very much. in kt ffact, if you remember, t testimony was really awkward. senators asking them, well, why can't you talk about what the president said and they didn't know what to say. as part of this reporting, first of all, we know that the reason they didn't quite know what to say is because they had both reached out to the white house and asked them how executive privilege might affect their testimony. they never heard back from the white house. it was only once in private when they talked to two separate investigative teams that it came out that each of them was asked by the president or at least were saying that the president suggested to them that they make public statements that there was no collusion between the trump
6:42 pm
campaign and the russians, anderson. >> but it's important to point out that both men are saying they did not feel pressured by the president into breaking the law. >> right. that is a good point. in this testimony that they gave behind closed doors, they said they didn't feel pressured, they didn't take it as an order. but, of course, you know, it's really up to the investigators what this constitutes in the end when they take everything cumulatively and examine it and make their determinations from there. >> director comey confirming to the fbi possible collusion between the trump campaign and russia. these alleged conversations between the president and both of these chiefs came after that. >> uh-huh. there's a timeline. james comey, then fbi director, announces that there's an investigation into potential collusion. days later, according to these top two intelligence officials, the president suggested they needed to make these
6:43 pm
suggestions. again, they didn't say they felt like an order but they felt it was odd and it made them feel uncomfortable. of course, the question here is whether cumulatively all of these incidents constitute obstruction of justice. at the very least, though, we have the president, while an investigation is going on, you see how much this public perception of potential collusion bothers him. you have him making suggestions to these top officials of what kind of things they should be saying publicly. again, during the investigation. so that raises either two things. either he knew that this was inappropriate or he didn't know and either of those choices is not a good one. anderson? >> michelle kosinski, thank you so much. lots back with our legal experts, jeffrey toobin and ken cuccinelli. both say they didn't feel pressured by the president to impede this investigation. does that in any way meet the bar of obstruction of justice? because it certainly seems it
6:44 pm
stops well short of it. >> well, it certainly does. i think this whole thing is helpful to the president and makes you wonder why was the white house not more on top of its game in terms of talking to these guys when they were headed into public testimony and to settle the question with them in their own minds about the exercise or lack thereof of executive privilege so this wouldn't have carried on the additional days that it has. because this was helpful to the president today. does it end everything? no, it doesn't. but they like to get their positives as well and it seems like they could have done this a lot more smoothly and sooner if the white house had just returned these gentlemen's calls. >> i don't see how it's favorable for the president. i agree it's not obstruction of justice in and of itself but it's an indirect corroboration of what james comey said. james comey was running the investigation. so telling him to stop it or
6:45 pm
suggesting that he stop it is potentially obstruction of justice. what these comments to the other intelligence officials just suggest the depth of the president's feeling that he wants to be vindicated and he wants the government, the rest of the government to say that he was not involved in this collusion and he wants it said by people who are not in a position to say it. so i don't think that -- >> well, that's not entirely correct. this was partially, jeffrey, an intelligence investigation. i mean, there's a logic to asking these two. and remember, for those who don't remember, mike rogers has been in his position for 2 1/2 years now, three years approaching. so he's an obama appointee and coats and he are saying the same thing. i don't think what you're saying is exclusive with what i'm saying in this particular case. >> jeffrey, you could look at this with a benign explanation,
6:46 pm
which is if there is no collusion, the president is extraordinarily frustrated that this story is out there all the time and, you know, wants whoever is around him to be able to say whatever they know or just say can't you guys put out a statement saying there is no collusion? >> that's right. he does want to be vindicated. but there is, at this point, an ongoing investigation of this precise issue. >> right. >> so to say to the people who are part of this investigation, "vindicate me before it's over" -- >> i'm just saying it's understandable if there is no collusion. >> it's a version of the paul ryan, well, he's knew at this sort of thing and doesn't understand how it works. when people are doing investigations, you're not supposed to tell them to announce their conclusions, especially when they're investigating you. and that's what the problem with what the president said. >> is this appropriate for the
6:47 pm
president to be asking these two guys? >> it's certainly clumsy in the sense that there is an ongoing investigation but i think a reasonable reading of this is the president probably very strongly believed that he'd already been vindicated. remember, by this time, comey had told him that he was not under a personal investigation and there is some question about combining donald trump the person with the campaign here for purposes of analysis. but he wants to hear from others in government what he already knows to be true and that is that he didn't collude with the russians in the campaign. and these two are in a position to do that. he's asking them to do what he believes is simply tell the truth but unusually for people heading their organizations to do it in public. that's part of what is so unusual here. >> yeah. >> just because you believe you are innocent doesn't mean you get to tell people that you are -- that you are innocent. i mean, that's why we have investigations. >> but it goes to the
6:48 pm
explanation of why it's happened. >> ken cuccinelli, jeffrey toobin, thanks. up next, the house passed its version of the health care bill and congressman tom mcarthur's bill. i'll talk to the congressman ahead about the senate version. complete with key nutrients we may need. plus it supports bone health with calcium and vitamin d. one a day women's in gummies and tablets. heri think i might burst..... totally immersed weekenders. whatever kind of weekender you are, there's a hilton for you. book your weekend break direct with and join the summer weekenders. thit stood up to 1's all-hands-on-deck summer, rain, hail, shine, and family gatherings galore. behr premium semi-transparent number one rated stain. rich, lasting color that weathers it all. only at the home depot.
6:49 pm
for her compassion and care. he spent decades fighting to give families a second chance. but to help others, they first had to protect themselves. i have afib. even for a nurse, it's complicated... and it puts me at higher risk of stroke. that would be devastating. i had to learn all i could to help protect myself. once i got the facts, my doctor and i chose xarelto®. xarelto®... to help keep me protected. once-daily xarelto®, a latest-generation blood thinner... ...significantly lowers the risk of stroke in people with afib not caused by a heart valve problem. it has similar effectiveness to warfarin. xarelto® works differently. warfarin interferes with at least 6 blood-clotting factors. xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor interacting with less of your body's natural blood-clotting function. for afib patients well-managed on warfarin, there is limited information on how xarelto® compares in reducing the risk of stroke. don't stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase risk of stroke. while taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. it may increase your risk of bleeding
6:50 pm
if you take certain medicines. xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. get help right away for unexpected bleeding, unusual bruising, or tingling. if you've had spinal anesthesia, watch for back pain or any nerve or muscle-related signs or symptoms. do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. tell your doctor before all planned medical or dental procedures... ...and before starting xarelto®-about any conditions, such as kidney, liver, or bleeding problems. it's important to learn all you can... help protect yourself from a stroke. talk to your doctor about xarelto®. there's more to know™.
6:51 pm
more on our breaking news from capitol hill. the gop senate health care bill
6:52 pm
is finally public. after weeks of secrecy. already republican senators say they oppose the bill in its current form. in may, republican congressman tom mcarthur's amendment helped the house version of the same bill squeak through to pass. i spoke to him earlier. congressman, first of all, the senate version of this bill, does it have your support as it stands right now? >> well, anderson, i haven't read the whole thing. i have read someries of it and talked to some of the senators about it. i think it's a move in the right direction. for one, they built off the framework that the house established and i think that's helpful. so we're not, you know, starting all over again from scratch. and i'm looking at what they did with the tax credits, with medicaid, with giving states flexibility and so far, i think it's a bill that we can work with. >> you -- you obviously -- you helped get the house bill across the finish line with your amendment which ultimately brought the house freedom caucus
6:53 pm
onboard and certainly know the difficulties of getting conservatives and moderates to work together. does it surprise you we're already seeing a split with some conservative members in senate on this bill or is that just kind of routine? >> no, i'm not surprised at all. i think that those fault lines are there just like in the house and the senate's going to have to work through them. you know, bear in mind, anderson, this is a discussion draft that many of those senators are just seeing today. so, people may be posturing, people may have serious concerns, and i think the senate's going to have to do the exact same thing that we did in the house. find a way to bridge this divide, and do two critical things. bring down costs for everyone and protect the most vulnerable. it's difficult. and they have to do it. they have to get this done because every week it seems we're hearing of more markets collapsing around the country, and, you knows, 10 million people are depending on their
6:54 pm
insurance today. they're going to loose it se it don't fix this. they have to get it done in the senate. >> do you buy when the cbo said more than 20 million people will be off health insurance with the house bill? >> i don't, anderson. i've had a problem with the cbo score from the beginning. they have a terrible record on health care. they predicted that 22 million people would be in the obamacare exchanges in 2016. they were off by 120%. and i found a lot of examples of bias in their work. i think that the cbo score has been a problem. >> last week, the president called the house version of the bill mean. i wonder what your reaction is, concerning you mplayed such a bg role in get it passed and didn't seem like he felt that way in the rose garden month month after it passed. >> he didn't, and i was with the president the sunday before those comments were supposedly made. i still haven't seen the
6:55 pm
sources. as far as i know, they're still unnamed sources so i don't know the context of it. i don't know the why. so it's really not something for me to respond to. i can say this, anderson, i have lived through my own health care crises multiple times in my life. i don't believe our bill is mean at all. we're trying to solve a real problem. a problem that's going to hurt -- it's already hurting millions of americans, but it's going to be devastating for the 10 million that are in the marketplace today if we don't fix it. there's nothing mean about trying to solve a problem that's a difficult one. how do you protect vulnerable people and bring costs down for everyone else? that is maybe the issue of our time. >> many viewers may not realize, you did -- you lost your oldest daughter, gracie, when she was just 11 years old and spoken a lot about knowing what it's like to struggle paying medical bills. >> well, and anderson, i had insurance.
6:56 pm
you know, in addition to the emotion of losing a child, i had over a million dollars in medical bills in her 11 years and insurance doesn't cover everything and we had our own challenges with that. we were a young er family, didnt have a lot of money in those days so i do know what it's like for people and i just -- i hope the american people will give us a chance to fix this system. >> congressman tom mcarthur, i appreciate your time. thank you. >> anderson, thank you. >> we'll be right back. but when it comes to mortgages, she's less confident. fortunately, there's rocket mortgage by quicken loans. apply simply. understand fully. mortgage confidently. mone hundredts thousand times a day, sending oxygen to my muscles. again! so i can lift even the most demanding weight. take care of all your most important parts with centrum. now verified non gmo and gluten free.
6:57 pm
pain is sometimes in my hands, be a distraction. right before a performance especially. only aleve has the strength to stop minor arthritis pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. this is my pain. but i am stronger. aleve. all day strong. when heartburn hits fight back fast with new tums chewy bites. fast relief in every bite. crunchy outside. chewy inside. tum tum tum tum
6:58 pm
new tums chewy bites.
6:59 pm
7:00 pm
that's it for us. thanks for watching. time to hand things over to don lemon. "cnn tonight" starts right now. i'll see you tomorrow. we finally learn the truth about trump's tapes. well, maybe. and the gop takes another shot at health care. this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. president trump admits he's been stringing us along for weeks. surprise. not so much. he doesn't have tapes of his chats with james comey after all, but this is a much bigger deal than the president may think. and here we go again. the gop's health care bill hanging by a thread. republicans threatening to vote against it. president trump undercutting his own party suggesting the bill needs work. so let's get to all of it now, cnn's athena jones and manu