tv CNN Newsroom With Fredricka Whitfield CNN July 15, 2017 8:00am-9:00am PDT
i'm fredricka witfield, it's 11:00 on the east coast. back from france and back into crisis control. president trump is spending the day at the u.s. women's open in new jersey. which is being held at his golf club in bedminster, pictures there with his son, eric. all of this as the president attends the tournament and makes calls to senators in a make-or-break effort to save a new gop health care bill. the white house is trying to navigate a growing crisis, centered on his son's meetings, back in june of 2017 with, a number of people tied to russia. donald trump junior's account of his secret meeting during the campaign continues to change. first the president's son claimed he met with a russian lawyer along with his brother-in-law, jared kushner and then campaign chairman paul manafort. well today we know at least
eight people were in the room including a russian-american lobbyist. it was a former soviet military officer. cnn's boris sanchez is covering all of this near bedminster, new jersey. boris, do we expect any response from the president? the white house? in any capacity on the latest development about the trump tower meeting? >> it looks like we lost boris sanchez, we'll try to reconnect with him. meantime we're learning more about the people who were in the secret meeting at trump tower. one of the newly discovered attendees in that room, a russian american lobbyist as i mention who had one senator has accused of being a soviet counterintelligence member. cnn's national security correspondent jim sciutto has the story. >> the june 2016 meeting at trump tower with donald trump junior, jared kushner and paul manafort included more people beyond the russian lawyer,
natalia veselnitskaya. a source familiar with the circumstances tells cnn. russian american lobbyist rinat akhmetshin told several media outlets that he was also in the meeting. akhmetshin told reporters for "the new york times" and the "washington post" that he's a veteran of the soviet army. in a march letter to the justice department, senate judiciary chairman kruk grassley said someone alleged to have conducted political disinformation campaign as as part of a pro russian lobbying effort. >> plainly this russia third party that was present, they were there to deliver a message as well as to receive a message. and plainly moscow understood only too well that this is conduct that the trump campaign would really appreciate. >> akhmetshin denied any links to the "washington post." saying quote at no time have i ever worked for the russian government or any of its
agencies. i was not an intelligence officer, never. he told the "post" he was born in russia and became a u.s. citizen in 2009. akhmetshin's lobbying effort, which he did on behalf of the russian lawyer, veselnitskaya, was aimed at repealing the magnistky act. a complaint filed against him with the department of justice, claimed that effort was on behalf of the kremlin. he's also been accused according to court papers filed in new york in 2015 of hacking on behalf of one company, in into the computer systems of a rival company to steal confidential information. the company withdrew accusation soon after without providing a reason. in an earlier related case, he denied a similar accusation, saying in an affidavit quote i'm not a computer specialist. and i am not capable of hacking. in addition to his lobbying work, akhmetshin was well known in washington for being connected to very powerful people in russia. both in the business world
there, and in government. and one more note, though he was born in russia, then the soviet union, he emigrated to the u.s. and is now a u.s. citizen. as a u.s. citizen, he can be subpoenaed to testify before the investigating committees on the hill. jim sciutto, cnn, washington. >> let's get more now on the latest revelations about donald trump junior's russia meeting from our panel now. cnn political commentator david swerdlick is assistant editor for the "washington post." cnn political analyst julian seltzer is a historian and michael selden is a cnn legal analyst. he was robert mueller's former special assistant at the department of justice. good to see all of you. david to you first. david swerdlick. how damaging is this constant drip of new details about this russia meeting. >> it's damaging on a couple of levels, first you have the fact that going back to a week ago, that donald trump junior acted as if he had told the public and the press everything there was
to know about this meeting. it was him, manafort, veselnitskaya and jared kushner, that's it, nothing to see here, nothing happened. and over the course of the week, all this other information came out, both the email that he released and now the revelation that now akhmetshin and a translator and his name is rob goldstone, the intermediary were all in this meeting as well. it speaks to the fact that the administration and donald trump junior, who is not in the administration, can't get their story straight on this issue. the other problem is now you have conservatives breaking away from the president on this issue. people like charles krauthammer, a "washington post" columnist, a conservative stalwart who has been a trump skeptic, but not willing to say this was collusion, wrote yesterday, this is collusion. no matter whether it worked or anything came of it. that's the danger for the trump administration. politically. legally, i think it still has to play out. >> joining us is michael weinstein, an investigative reporter for international affairs. welcome to the panel.
michael zeleny. donald trump junior said he released emails about the meeting because he wanted to be totally transparent. here's what he said during an interview with sean hannity on fox news. >> as far as you know, as far as this incident is concerned, this is all of it? >> this is everything. this is everything. >> all right now we know, that was not all of it at the time. it was four people and now apparently there are eight. we still don't know who the other two people are. but we know more about the one russian-american lobbyist at the table. is the president's son putting himself in more legal jeopardy by not revealing everything? just putting it all out there. who was there, what in totality was talked about. >> i think he put himself in legal jeopardy when in those emails it was disclosed that mr. goldstone said to him i'm bringing a russian government attorney to meet you who possibly has opposition research on hillary clinton. and donald trump junior's response was, i love it. in other words, donald trump junior was willing, all too willing to conspire with the
russian government to trash his father's opponent. that is, demonstrates a willingness to commit collusion with the russian government. rinat akhmetshin, i've written about him at cnn before. he met a few months ago with republican representative dana roarbacher in berlin. he's being known for quite pro-kremlin in his views he thinks the u.s. and russia have a what natural alliance when it comes to counterterrorism and rinat akhmetshin, according to witnesses and representative roarbatcher was discussing ending sanctions against russia. he's been described in the press as a former gru officer during the soviet period. the gru is military intelligence. he denies having any current connection to the russian government. i leave it to viewers to decide whether or not that's accurate this is a guy who has spent years lobbying on behalf of moscow in washington, d.c. and natalia veselnitskaya, her mode of operation in the united states is very clear.
she has come here to campaign against the so-called magnitsky act an landmark human rights bill aimed at sanctioning russian officials and citizens who had conspired to defraud the russian taxpayer of $230 million and cover it up with a host of crimes, including possibly torture and murder. over which the attorney who uncovered it. this is not a woman who is acting as a freelance or some kind of rogue agent. if she's here in the united states, it is because she was sent here by the russian government. and indeed "the wall street journal" reported yesterday that she has a relationship with russia's prosecutor-general, yuri chaika. >> we're talking about different investigative and legal roads for son donald junior and son-in-law, jared kushner, both of them in the room.
the camp has said, perhaps they were naive. they didn't realize they should have gone to higher authorities, that's a very tough explanation for anyone to digest. >> right. >> but as you look at them, in legal terms, where might legal jeopardy lie with respect to each. you have to distinguish who is a government employee. and under certain obligations and who is not. so kushner is a government employee. and he has an obligation to be truthful and all the submissions he makes to the government with respect to his security clearances or otherwise. and the absence of this meeting and other meetings on his security application form, the sf-86 form potentially puts him in danger of being charged with being untruthful to a government agent. and that's a five-year felony. trump junior is not a government employee. and so he has no forms to fill out and therefore he has no
underlying obligation to be truthful. however, of course, in the end there will be an evaluation made as to whether or not this conduct this meeting in particular, amounted to a conspiracy to violate the federal election laws. it is illegal to solicit a foreign national to make a contribution. and it doesn't even have to be accepted, this solicitation doesn't have to be accepted to be a violation of this statute. and so trump junior and kushner in respect of this, could well be on the brink of being chargeable for conspiring to violate these laws. we have facts that we still need to gather, but that's the cusp on which they sit. >> and perhaps largely, that's why we're hearing from one citizen and not the other government employee thus far, about what really happened here. julian, you called this revelation about the meeting and the emails the most damaging yet. that was before we learned about the other people in the room.
so how does this broaden the scope in your view? >> there's a two-track process. one is the legal track which we're now talking about and then there's the political track. and the real question is, how firm is republican support on capitol hill for the president. and equally important, conservative support in the world of media and the think tanks? this was very damaging, it really undermined part of the hargment that there were no areas of proximity between officials connected to russia and members of the campaign. it's hard to see the story and learn about the story, and come away thinking that original claim was true. and then they keep undermining their own credibility. they say this is it. and it wasn't. there was more to the story. and so i think the credibility wears thin with more and more republicans even those defending him. and we have seen cracks this week. with commentators that we've
discussed. who are more to the right, who are now openly criticizing the president, talking about some of the worst possibilities. and backing away from the staunch defense. it's not so fake at all, some of this. and i think there's where this is having a political impact. still we have to see if republicans on the hill start to think this is really going to be devastating politically. or devastating in terms of principal. we don't know that yet. >> david swerdlick, your paper, the "washington post," reporting that president trump has hired a new lawyer to manage the response to the russian investigation. reportedly attorney ty cobb will work inside the white house on questions dealing with russia. what does that suggest? >> it's like suggests at a minimum that they're starting to really take this seriously in a way that the at least outwardly we have not seen before. as julian said they've been going along for the last several months with the idea that there's nothing to see here, this is a witchhunt, let's move
on. and now the administration, various people around the administration, donald trump junior, jared kushner are hunkering down with their own private independent counsel because they realize there's legal jeopardy. one point about legal jeopardy. even though donald trump junior did not have an obligation legally in the same way that someone in the administration did, i think a lot of people are starting to scratch at this and look at this and say, didn't he have a moral obligation to be a patriot? and if in fact what has been reported out in the new york times and other sources about this whole series of events, including the email, what does that say about how the campaign was being conducted? again it may not have risen to the level of criminality. but is this how you proceed if you want to lead the country? >> may i add something to that? >> i don't disagree with that at all. what it portends potentially is difficulty down the road for these guys. ultimately the special counsel mueller is going to have to make
credibility evaluations of people as he decides who to believe and what charges may be brought. the lack of credibility in these witnesses will hurt them down the line. it's moral and it's also legal. >> universally, most people believe russia to be an adversary and perhaps the instinct would be to tell some authority if russia would reach out to them to say we want to help you out in this election. but then to the defense i guess of donald trump junior, he's also trying to imply that there's been a business relationship. a longstanding relationship with russia and that may be why he they were potentially very naive. david swerdlick, julian seltzer, michael weiss, michael zeldin, thank you very much. president trump turns his attention to health care. what the white house is doing today to push the embattled gop bill across the finish line.
what in real time?stomer insights from the data wait, our data center and our clouds can't connect? michael, can we get this data to...? look at me...look at me... look at me... you used to be the "yes" guy. what happened to that guy? legacy technology can handcuff any company. but "yes" is here. so, you're saying we can cut delivery time? yeah. with help from hpe, we can finally
[ sighs ] hey, i was using that. what, you think we own stock in the electric company? i will turn this car around right now! there's nobody back there. i was becoming my father. [ clears throat ] it's...been an adjustment, but we're making it work. you know, progressive.com makes it easy for us to get the right home insurance.
[ snoring ] progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents, but we can protect your home and auto. [ chuckles ] all right. lawmakers on both sides-the-aisle are alarmed by recent revelations on a meeting between the trump team and a russian lawyer during the 2016 presidential campaign. jared kushner was the only person in that meeting who now holds a government title and he didn't disclose that contact on his original security clearance application. now democrats are calling for the president's son-in-law and top adviser to have his security clearance revoked. cnn's tom gorman has details. >> inauguration week and the president's son-in-law files his first papers for a security clearance on january 18th. jared kushner reveals no contact with any foreigners during the campaign or transition. but the next day he says he hit that send button too soon and will amend that. in may, according to his lawyer,
the papers are updated to show kushner had over 100 calls or meetings with representatives of more than 20 countries, most during the transition. by mid june as they prepare for congressional testimony, kushner's lawyers say they discovered the email from donald trump junior. setting up the meeting last year with russian lawyer natalia veselnitskaya, allegedly to get russian government dirt on hillary clinton. donald junior said it was a bust. >> it went nowhere, and it was apparent that wasn't what the meeting was about. >> on june 21st kushner amended his security papers again to reflect his attendance at that meeting. according to a source close to kushner, he said he was going to tell president trump. we don't know if he did. >> nothing happened from the meeting, zero happened from the meeting. even as the president called the
russian lawyer meeting meaningless, he said he learned of it not in june, but only days ago. >> he was not aware of the meeting, did not attend the meeting and was only informed about the emails, very recently by his counsel. >> kushner's late admission of that meeting has spurred sharp interest in all his foreign contacts, not initially disclosed. as an adviser all meetings with real foreigners must be listed. it seems strange to me that those meetings were at least conveniently forgotten at least by mr. kushner. >> how long was the meeting? >> about 20 minutes. >> about 20 minutes. >> and jared left after five or ten? >> the russian lawyer says neither kushner nor then trump campaign manager paul manafort played much of a role. >> translator: he was the only one i was speaking to. >> amid the late revelations, democrats are fuming that kushner was given security clearance at all. >> anybody else vying for a clearance out of these facts
would be denieda that clearance. >> out of the three representatives of donald trump we know were in the room with that russian lawyer, only jared kushner is now an official adviser to the president. and that has put him squarely in the crosshairs of investigators trying to figure out if anyone did anything illegal. tom foreman, cnn, washington. up next, president trump and vice president pence are making calls to shore up support as the senate's health care bill hangs by a thread. we'll discuss, after the break. having moderate to severe plaque psoriasis is not always easy. it's a long-distance run. and you have the determination to keep going. humira has a proven track record of being prescribed for nearly 10 years. humira works inside the body to target and help block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to symptoms. in clinical trials, most adults taking humira were clear or almost clear and many saw 75% and even 90% clearance in just four months. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis.
serious, sometimes fatal, infections and cancers, including lymphoma have happened as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. join over 250,000 people who have chosen humira. ask about the #1 prescribed biologic by dermatologists. humira & go. what in real time?stomer insights from the data wait, our data center and our clouds can't connect? michael, can we get this data to...? look at me...look at me... look at me... you used to be the "yes" guy. what happened to that guy?
anyone who calls it a hobby doesn't understand. we know that a person's passion is what drives them. [ clapping ] and that's why every memorial we create is a true reflection of the individual. only a dignity memorial professional can celebrate a life like no other. find out how at sanfranciscodignity.com. or a little internet machine? [ phone ringing ] hi mom. it makes you wonder... shouldn't we get our phones and internet from the same company? that's why xfinity mobile comes with your internet.
you get up to 5 lines of talk and text at no extra cost. [ laughing ] so all you pay for is data. see how much you can save. choose by the gig or unlimited. call or go to xfinitymobile.com introducing xfinity mobile. a new kind of network designed to save you money. president trump and vice president pence are making calls throughout the weekend on the gop health care bill. as part of an aggressive push on twitter by phone and behind the closed doors. the president to net a major legislative achievement ahead of the senate's august recess. but as cnn's ryan nobels
explains it may be an uphill battle for the white house. >> senate leadership and the white house are currently engaged in a high-stakes campaign rallying to get the 50 votes they need to get this health care reform bill passed. the white house and senate lead remembers making an aggressive push to convince republican members to vote yes on their latest version of health care reform. >> we are very, very close to ending this health care nightmare. we are so close. >> 52 republican senators have now had more than 24 hours to digest the bill. and as it stands right now. two members, susan collins of maine and rand paul of kentucky remain opposed to the plan. >> it just does not make sense to do a major rewrite of a vital entitlement program, without having any hearings or consideration of the implications. >> senate majority leader mitch mcconnell cannot lose any more votes if he hopes to get the bill through. the president, who has let
mcconnell take the lead in the day-to-day negotiations is stepping up his public push to get the bill passed. he tweeted four times about health care friday morning. writing quote republican senators are working hard to get their failed obamacare replacement approved. i will be at my desk, pen in hand. vice president mike pence made a similar pitch in a speech to the nation's governors. >> president donald trump is going to lead this congress to rescue the american people from the collapsing policies of obamacare. >> trump is also working behind the scenes. spending part of his time in paris making phone calls to gop senators, including senator rand paul. whose position has not changed. many rank-and-file republicans who remain undecide reasonable doubt waiting to hear from stakeholders back home before making up their minds. >> if they wait and speak with their state leaders, as i will over the weekend. i hope they wait until they see the cbo score. which doesn't come out until next week. >> republicans from states with
governor who is expanded medicaid are under a special kind of pressure. because this bill rolls back federal funding for the expansion. rob portman of ohio and dean heller of nevada are both dealing with gop governors unhappy with the plan and that as brian sandoval met one-on-one pence, but still has concerns. even though the prospects for this bill do look dim right now. most senators are still optimistic even though they remain undecided. much will hinge on the score from the congressional budget office, which is due out on monday. ryan nobles, cnn, on capitol hill. >> i want to bring in congressman rodney davis, a republican from illinois and a member of the moderate tuesday group caucus. congressman, good to see you. so this latest version of the bill includes an option for insurers to offer cheaper, more bare-bones policies that the amendment put up by senator ted cruz. which bolsters staunch conservatives. but moderates don't like it. and the bill does not address moderates' concerns about cuts
to medicaid. which would be slashed by $772 million by 2026. and that would leave an estimated 15 million, fewer people insured by the program. again we have yet to get the cbo score which comes out on monday. so you represent a state where nearly one in four are on medicaid. do you support this latest version? >> well before we start to talk about what bills we support and what we don't. let's go back to the house bill that we put forth. there's a house bill that we believe is going to make our medicaid program stronger. even in states like illinois where i see the medicaid expansion program where we have 44% of all medicaid expansion employees are able-bodied adults, ages 19-34. we've got to do what we can to get them off of medicaid and to a job and get them better health care, cheaper health care. because this program that's scheduled to get 5% less reimbursement from the federal government in just a couple of years, is not going to be sustainable and those who are --
going to be affected the most are going to be the aged and disab disabled. >> mitch mcconnell's plan. you know other versions that are competing with mcconnell's plan. >> well if it's anything like the negotiations we went through a few short months ago in the house, fredricka, then what we're going to see is this bill change before it gets to a final vote. before i can comment on what the final plans are, i want to see the final plans. but i would urge those senators who have concerns with their state's medicaid programs just like i did. to do what they can to make the changes that they see fit before they send the bill back to us in the house. >> what do you want to see in that plan? >> what do you want to see in that plan? >> well i'd like to see states like illinois and others that have very low reimbursement
rates get incentivized to implement things like a work requirement, so woo can focus on job training, get people out into a job. let's incentivize that a lit little bit more. i would like to see us actually put forth plans that are going to truly provide the access and the multiple layers of protections for preexisting condition coverage that the house bill has. and i would hope that the senate would do the exact same thing as we did. >> is it your hope that there would just simply be modifications made on the affordable care act? or are you proposing to completely revamp before the senate wb able to entertain a vote on it. before making its way back to the house? >> i would like to see them do a fix and a replacement. just like we did.
>> one of the biggest misnomers we see on repeal and replace. any time you change a law, you fix it. any time you move toward a positive change, a repeal of anything, you have to replace it with something. even in legislation it can be as simple as changes a period to a semi colon. that's a fix what we did in the house is a fix. what they're doing in the senate is a fix. it's a fix to a broken system and a broken law that has left 29 million americans right now without health coverage. and 31 million more, the producer, the cameraman behind me, that can't use the coverage that they have. >> isn't it being argued that the house plan was not a complete fix, it was a repeal and replace it with this. the success rate has been at the stage where mitch mcconnell is trying to craft something completely different. >> i don't agree with that assessment at all. i think our house bill was a
bill that put layers upon layers of protections for preexisting condition coverage. we believe that this is the first step in a three-step process to really truly provide the families that i represent in central illinois. that are part of those 31 million americans that can't afford to use the coverage they have. or they can't afford coverage so they're not buying it. we believe our plan is the first step in providing those alternatives. that's what we need. and we have to take a step back from the rhetoric that we see in washington. and really delve down into the policies and really what is frustrating, fredricka, is we got no democrat support. no democrat help in fixing a law that they actually gave the american people before i got to washington. >> having the democrats said they're not interested in repealing it, they would be willing to help fix the existing plan. >> well again, that's exactly what we did in the house. there was a fix. when you repeal and replace something as simple as a letter or a word in a bill. that is a fix. we fixed it. i'm not going to get into a
rhetorical debate where democrats show no willinged in to try and actually positively change, fix, repeal, replace, whatever you want it call it. they've done nothing to actually help us fix a law that has left 60 million americans without coverage or coverage that they can't afford to use. that's an abdication of their responsibility, as an elected official and they have walked away and they have stood up and just complained about a process that's being put in place, led by republicans only and that's what needs to change. and that's what my voters and that's what middle america wants to happen. >> so senate republicans need 50 votes how will republicans bring both moderates and conservatives together, so that they would be able to get the votes needed to pass? >> you know it's going to have to take place the same way it did in the house. remember, our first attempt at passing a bill didn't even get called for a vote. the white house, they're engaged, they were engaged in the house version, they sat down
with president trump, vice president pence, their administration, with all facets of the republican majority in the house. and we came together and passed a plan that i believe is a good first step. >> do you see that happening here? >> the senate is going to have to do the same. >> i do, yeah, i don't think there's anything different in what they're going through versus what we went through. i heard a lot of armchair quarterbacking from the senators during our debates. i'm going, i'm going to restrain myself from doing so. on the senate side. but now they're the ones who are on the playing field. they wanted to serve in the u.s. senate. they're in the big leagues now. they've got to sit down and determine what can change to get them to yes. and that's exactly what i hope they do. >> congressman, i want to also ask you about the revelations involving the meeting of the russia involvement in the campaign for trump in 2016 and this trump tower meeting back in june of that year. we now know that there were eight people in that meeting. including a lobbyist with
alleged ties to russian intelligence. what about this meeting most concerns you? >> well it's a meeting that i don't think i would ever take. i'm concerned that, that there wasn't, there wasn't a more concerted effort to actually disclose these revelations. i'm glad that mr. kushner has amended his filings for a security clearance to disclose these. but what it's done is it made sure that he's probably going to have to answer questions, in one of the three investigations that are going on right now. the house intelligence committee in a bipartisan way, senate intelligence committee in a bipartisan way. and also, one directed by former director mueller, who used to run the fbi. so he's going to have questioned. i'm sure donald trump junior is going to be questioned. any democrat who wants to go work in the white house later ought to be starting to put a file together of every single meeting they've ever had in their lifetime with, any foreign agent or anybody in any foreign
country, otherwise this is going to continue to paralyze every single administration from now until the end of the future. >> jared kushner is a senior adviser to the president. do you believe the president needs to revoke his security clearance, given he did not reveal this meeting? >> you know, let's take a step back and let's let these investigations play out. i'm sure mr. kushner is probably going to have to testify now. because -- >> right but he should have revealed that in his application for security clearance, that's what i'm asking you about. he should have revealed that in the application for security clearance, he didn't. should the president has the power to revoke his security clearance. do you believe he should? >> well that's going to be a decision left to the president and those who actually look at those disclosures and offer that security clearance. i don't do that. >> i know it's his decision. >> it's one more lesson learned. >> do you think the president should? we know it's the president's decision. what's your opinion on it?
>> you know again, i don't have enough information about security clearances. i can tell you, i get top-secret security clearance, i don't get that just by being a member of congress. those are the types of issues we always have to face when we're sitting in rooms, getting classified information and we've got to make sure that we treat that classified information with the upmost respect for our nation's own national security. i trust our security advisers are going to be able to determine who deserves that clearance and who doesn't. a simple mistake, forgetting a meeting? it's going to cost mr. kushner some consequences of testifying. whether or not that rises to the level of revoking a security clearance? i'm going to leave to the experts. >> congressman rodney davis, thanks so much for your time. after the break, a new chilling details are emerging behind four pennsylvania murders that left four dead. and two cousins behind bars. (avo) come with us...
...to a new world. deeper than the ocean. as unfathomable as the universe. a world that doesn't exist outside you... ...but within you. where breakthrough science is replacing chemotherapy with immunotherapy. where we can now attack the causes of disease, not just the symptoms. where medicines once produced for all, are now designed to fit you. today 140,000 biopharmaceutical researchers
go bodly to discover treatments and cures unimaginable ten years ago... ...and are on the verge of more tomorrow. another anti-wrinkle cream in no hurry to make anything happen. neutrogena® rapid wrinkle repair works in just one week. with the fastest retinol formula to visibly reduce wrinkles. neutrogena®. casper makes one perfect supportive and comfortable. premium foam layers. breathable for airflow. perfect rebound, plus perfect lift. pick your size, you get 100 nights to test it out. test the layers, be a layer, casper.
chilling details in a bizarre murder case out of pennsylvania. two cousins have been charged with killing four young men after allegedly luring them into a rural area under the pretense of a drug deal. a massive search for the missing men ended when one of the suspects, cosmo dinardo started cooperating. telling investigators where to find the bodies. he and his cousin, both 20 years old, are facing murder and robbery charges. let me bring in now cnn national correspondent brinn gingras, what can you tell us? >> the two cousins, 20 years old, cosmo dinardo and sean kratz, are behind bars on no bond. the judge entered not guilty pleas for them and they've got these murder charges. but more than a dozen other charges for each of them in this case. as you mentioned, related to the case of four men who disappeared from this area in bucks county, pennsylvania, just last week. like you said, a stunning
confession, really from both of those men. in court documents we learned that dinardo says he lured one of the men back to his family property, not far from where we are, with an intent to sell him drugs. instead he shot and killed the man and buried the body on his family's property. accord together documents two days later he came back with his cousin, lured three more of the men to his family's property and shot and killed them with his cousin, according to the papers, buried them in a second grave and then even tried to conceal their bodies, by burning them. i mean just horrific details and stunning confession. and once this was all said and done, the district attorney says they were able to find all four bodies, they were able to recover evidence from the scene and i want you to listen to what he said after this case was apparently closed. >> we're here to accomplish two goals that was to bring these young men home to their loved ones who have done nothing wrong. have done nothing to deserve this horrible, unspeakable
tragedy that has been beset upon them. we're here to seek justice for them. and that's our commitment. >> you can tell it was personal for him. i want to mention dinardo struck a deal with that d.a., he will not face the death penalty in this case. however the d.a. told us that is not the case for kratz. it's possible he could still face the death penalty. fred? >> brin gingras, thanks so much. history was on the line today for venus williams. but she came up just short in wimbledon in the singles final. we're live in london after this. what in real time?stomer insights from the data wait, our data center and our clouds can't connect? michael, can we get this data to...? look at me...look at me... look at me...
what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. ♪ everybody two seconds! ♪ "dear sebastian, after careful consideration of your application, it is with great pleasure that we offer our congratulations on your acceptance..." through the tuition assistance program, every day mcdonald's helps more people go to college. it's part of our commitment to being america's best first job. ♪
. . . a disappointing loss for venus williams trying to make the title but fell short. let's bring in pat cash, a 1987 wimbledon champ in his own right. so gardin beats venous aus. it is quite a accomplishment because she has been enduring a lot at 37. >> reporter: yes. she is a terrific player, venus, how she is managing her career she came up against a very, very good player, gabina.
certainly, venus had plenty of chances to get the set and she piled the pressure on while venus was having a little bit of a letdown and it was 5-0 and 6-0. she played some brilliant tennis upped pressure. >> venus williams said there were a lot of beautiful moments along the way. she is the runner-up but still not bad. >> reporter: she is in the f twilight for her career. for her to be in the wimbledon final and the australian open earlier in the year, she is
moving great. mainly her focus. she doesn't play as much tennis as muguruza does. these girls are match toughened. it is tough to expect venus to compete all the time. for her to be in the final, it is a fantastic story. the u.s. open is next. you see both of them journeying towar towards the u.s. open, maybe another matchup? >> reporter: well, muguruza has already won the french open. she expected to continue to play well after she won the french open last year. she didn't win many matches until now. she is a very good athletes. the thing in the women's circuit, they realize that there is every single opportunity for every player to win. serena is out having a baby, so, really, any of the girls in the top 20 almost you could say would expect to be in the semifinals or finals and be very competitive. >> and serena's baby is due
somewhere in august. let's talk quickly about men's tennis, roger federer, he is a vet at 35. he will be in the final two. what's it looking like? you would expect roger to get through this. merritt ilitch from croatia is going to be a little bit fatigued. the last person you want to play against when you are fatigued is roger federer. i expect him to come through in three or four sets. we will see how it goes. chilic has the toughness to make it tough but i think roger federer will get through in the end. >> pat cash, as you are and will always be.
pat cash. good talking to you. we've got so much more straight ahead in the "newsroom." first, in los angeles, hundreds of at-risk youth look to one man to help them find the right path. they come from juvenile detention centers and from foster care and many are high school dropouts. the man they connect with can relate. growing up, he spent five years on juvenile probation. his name is harry grammar. he is this week's cnn hero. >> everybody enter in this room including myself have a story to tell. >> go and tell them your struggle. listen to our young people. we need to find out what it is that they are longing for, what they want. >> to find out how harry transforms the lives of these
young people, you can watch the story l story right now at cnnheroes.com. nominate someone you think should be a 2010 cnn hero. >> brought to you by geico. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more. visit geico.com for a free rate quote. so let the geico insurance agency help you with homeowners insurance and protect yourself from things like fire, theft, or in this case, water damage. cannonball! now if i had to guess, i'd say somewhere upstairs there's a broken pipe. let the geico insurance agency help you with homeowners insurance. call today to see how much you could save.
your only worry...ty customer first guarantee... will be navigating the local traffic. get help with hotels, free twenty-four-hour flight changes, and our price match guarantee. travelocity.® wander wisely.™ this this this is my body of proof. proof of less joint pain and clearer skin. this is my body of proof that i can take on psoriatic arthritis with humira. humira works by targeting and helping to block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further joint damage, and clear skin in many adults. humira is the #1 prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb.
tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. want more proof? ask your rheumatologist about humira. what's your body of proof? (flourish spray noise) (flourish spray noise) (flourish spray noise) (flourish spray noise) the joy of real cream in 15 calories per serving. enough said. reddi-wip. (flourish spray noise) share the joy.
hello, again. thank you for joining me. i'm fredricka whitfield. back from france and into crisis control. president trump is spending the day at the u.s. women's open in new jersey which is being held in his golf club in bedminster, new jersey. there he is stand wg hing with son, trump. as he attend the tournament, he is in the business to save a new