tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN July 17, 2017 3:00pm-4:00pm PDT
happening now, clearance and security, tonight mounting calls for the president's son-in-law and senior advisor to have his access to classified information revoked. with jared kushner under scrutiny in the russia investigation, is his pivotal white house job in any jeopardy? defending don junior, in a new tweet president trump keeps trying to downplay his son's meeting with the russian lawyer aimed at getting kremlin dirt on hillary clinton. the president's campaign also is helping to defend trump junior by spending tens of thousands of dollars. health care, as senator john mccain recovers from unexpected surgery, a senate vote on the gop health care bill is now on hold. we are tracking senator mccain's condition and uncertain prognosis he is for obamacare appeal. world's first active laser wep now ready to attack hostile targets at the speed of light. stand by for cnn exclusive as
u.s. navy test fires a powerful and unprecedented weep. we want to welcome our in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." following escalating outrage that jared kushner still has a security clearance as the president's senior advisor and son-in-law faces intensifying scrutiny in the russia investigation. some top democrats are demanding kushner's clearance be revoked immediately, suggesting that america's security is at risk every day that kushner has access to the nation's secrets. this as lawmakers press for more information about that 2016 meeting with the russian lawyer arranged by donald trump, jr. and attended by kushner and former trump campaign chairman paul manafort. the president is ramping up his defense of his son tweeting today that most politicians would agree to meet with someone promising damaging information about an opponent, even if it was supposedly coming from the
kremlin. but even members of his own party dispute that. tonight the senate judiciary committee chairman tells cnn he is pushing for trump junior and manafort to testify under oath within the next two weeks. also tonight, a senate vote on the endangered gop health care bill is on hold while senator john mccain recovers from unexpected surgery. the 80-year-old republican had a blood clot removed from above his left eye. the health bill can't move forward without mccain's yes vote. democrats now are urging gop leaders to use the extra time to hold hearings on the legislation that's in jeopardy because of republican opposition this hour. i'll talk about those stories and more with senator richard blumenthal. he's a democrat on the judiciary and armed services committees. and our correspondents and specialists are also standing by. first, let's go to our white house correspondent sara murray with more of the growing concerns about jared kushner and security clearance. sara, there is apparently a lot
of pressure on kushner right now and the trump white house. >> reporter: that's right, wolf. democrats are calling on kushner security clearance to be revoked and while republicans have not gone quite that far, there is certainly concern on both ends of pennsylvania avenue about the future of kushner's security clearance. jared kushner, the president apartments son is in law and senior advisor is regularly at president trump's side. whether the president is mulling national security decisions, meeting with foreign leaders, or attempting to strike a mid east peace deal, a key component of kushner's white house portfolio. without a security clearance, some experts say it would be practically impossible for kushner to serve in the west wing. for now kushner has been operating with an interim clearance. the final decision could come down to trump. he can override any reservations from others in the white house to ensure kushner receives full clearance. but such a move would likely come with a political price at a time when trump has little political capital to spare. for lawmakers, kushner's
repeated revisions to his security questionnaire are raising red flags. >> it is very bother some to me that jared kushner has not forgotten once, not twice, but three times to put down this information. >> that is an issue that we need to look at. but right now we don't have enough evidence. >> reporter: the first version of kushner's security document left the question about foreign contacts blank. kushner has since updated it multiple times to include more than 100 foreign contacts. and his meeting with donald trump, jr. and a russian lawyer pedaling dirt on hillary clinton from the kremlin, according to e-mails about the meeting. kushner's team says his original paperwork was submitted in error before it was completed. and that kushner hasn't intentionally omitted any information. adds mr. kushner has consistently stated he is eager to cooperate and share what he knows. his personal lawyer said in a recent statement on the matter. now, we went back to kushner's team today to ask if
they wanted to elaborate on concerns about the revisions. they declined to do so, referring us back to the previous statement from kushner's lawyer, wolf? >> sara murray, thanks very much. today president trump climbed into a fire truck as he tried to change the topic from the political fire storm. all part of a plan to showcase american made products. that is fueling controversy as well. let's go do senior white house correspondent jeff zeleny. this theme renews questions about various trump brand products that are made overseas. >> reporter: good evening, would have. it does indeed. the white house was trying to change the subject to get back to the president's agenda here. and the republican agenda here in washington by focusing on what they're calling made in america week. the first of three themed weeks here going forward in these summer weeks ahead. but there were some questions about the trump brand and where some of their products are coming from. from ivanka trump's blouses, some are made in bangladesh to the president's shirts and ties,
some are made in china, other places. so, the white house was defending that. wolf, i can tell you it was quite the sight as we are seeing pictures of the president climbing into that fire truck on the south lawn of the white house. he said at one point, where's the fire? i'll put it out. but it is the smoke from the russia investigation the white house is trying to get beyond. and the white house is also focusing on health care. so, the president this afternoon was explaining why the health care vote is not happening this week. of course, john mccain, republican of arizona, recovering from surgery he had over the weekend. now, john mccain has been one of the biggest skeptics and critics of this white house. but today the president said this about mccain. >> we hope john mccain gets better very soon because we miss him. he's a crusty voice in washington, plus we need his vote. [ laughter ] >> and he'll be back, and he will be back sooner than somebody else would be back. he'll be back soon. but we need that vote and we
need a number of votes because we do have to repeal obamacare, and we will end up replacing it with something that is going to be outstanding, far, far better than failing obamacare. the republican senators are great people, but they have a lot of different states. some states need this, some states need that, but we're getting it together and it's going to happen. right, mike? >> yes, i think. [ applause ] >> reporter: so, the president there talking in some detail about the difficulty of really trying to make good on this republican promise for the last seven years to repeal and replace the affordable care act. but, wolf, the president is inviting at least six republican senators over here to the white house tonight for dinner. but all six of them, by our measure, are already supportive of this. it's other republicans, moderates who are not supportive of this bill, yet. wolf, it definitely shines a
light on how difficult this legislation has been to get through here. but they are hoping at some point, if not july, obviously with senator mccain being out, in august to get health care bill full. but, wolf, that is very much an open question here. the longer this waits, the more issues it could gather. >> yeah, i looked at the list of the six republican senators invited to have dinner with the president tonight. all of them as you point outlook like they are on board with the republican senate. bill. >> they are. >> why is the president inviting, let's say, six republican senators who may be on the fence right now to try to convince them to support it? >> reporter: that is ape good question, wolf. it seems to be the one thing we have not seen this president do is use the power of the bully pulpit to persuade people. again this week, he is not scheduled to leave the white house at all, travel in the country and sort of get support for this. and that is one of the ways they could turn this around, by urging those republicans on the fence to support it, by getting their constituents behind them
here, wolf. but all the republicans coming over here tonight are supportive of the bill. the white house says the president is deeply engaged in this, wolf, but he's not nearly as engaged as other presidents, excuse me, on previous matters here. but he has a couple more weeks yet to get this bill through the senate. wolf? >> all right, jeff zeleny at the white house. let's get more on the issues. senator blumenthal on the judiciary committee, thank you for joining us. >> thank you, would have. >> the president's senior advisor, nancy pelosi, she says his security clearance should be, quote, revoked immediately. do you agree? >> i agree completely. i asked that his security clearance be revoked last week when we first learned of many of the aggravating details, the identity of the people who came to this meeting on the russian side, who clearly specialize in lifting sanctions. there are also the e-mails that show the bait that was dangled, the promises that were made of
information damaging to hillary clinton from russian sources, likely obtained illicitly. what we have here is a signal at the highest levels of the trump campaign, including jared kushner, that they were open to a compromising relationship potentially in violation of federal criminal law. if it were anyone but jared kushner, the son-in-law of the president, he would be fired. but also clearly his security clearance revoked, and i think it should be. >> i know a lot of democrats agree with you. any republicans as far as you noah gr know agree with you? >> there is a lot of disquiet among my republican colleagues because of this meeting which is so explosive, and the evidence that we've seen of criminal intent which is the most difficult part of any federal crime to prove. and those words, "i love it," from donald trump, jr. when he was told about this illicit information coming from russian government sources, probably
obtained illicitly, will haunt him. and there is a lot of disquiet about jared kushner's security clearance and about where this investigation goes. >> did he know when he accepted that numerator tags with the meeting with the russian lawyer, the dirt, the information that was supposed to be provided, was obtained through illicit measures? >> there are indications that it might well have been obtained through illicit means, and that should have prompted all three of those individuals, manafort, kushner and trump junior, to report it to the fbi, if not before, after it occurred. >> what is the status of these three individuals testifying before the judiciary, your judiciary committee? we understand they were supposed to be a hearing on wednesday, but that has now been put off? >> the two individuals that have been called to testify, trump junior and manafort, i hope will be promptly. but remember also, wolf, very important to keep in mind that
questioning of these witnesses intelligently, probingly, productively, means having some documents beforehand. so, we need those documents and perhaps interviews. this kind of very profoundly significant investigation by the judiciary committee to over see the administration of justice in this country should be done with full preparation. >> so, you weren't really prepared to do it as early as wednesday. is there any reason to believe that the special counsel, robert mueller, has asked your committee to hold off while he does his work? >> with all due respect, i'm going to decline to talk about our discussions with the special counsel, but we are making an effort to de-conflict to avoid any kind of overlap or contention that might be prejudicial to what he's doing. what we can do right away, and we should do as a congress right away, is approve the sanctions bill because those russian
participants, veselnitskaya, were there for a very clear purpose, and that was to lift sanctions. that was what vladimir putin wanted done. unlikely that they would have been there without his knowing about it. and what needs to be done now is a message to the russians that this will cause them to pay a price. meddling in our elections through the sanctions bill passed by the senate, overwhelmingly, 98-2. >> you passed it 98-2. a revised version, 97-2. but it stalled in the house of representatives. it hasn't even come up yet. why? >> the reason, quite simply, and bluntly, is donald trump, the president has declined to endorse it. in fact, they have implicitly opposed it. i call on the president to demand that the house approve it so that we can send that message to the russians that they will pay a price for what they did in 2016 and they'll pay an even higher price if they do it again. >> what you're suggesting is the
speaker paul ryan top republican in the house, he's delaying a vote on this legislation, this bill passed by the senate, 97 or 98-2, at the request of the white house? >> there is simply no good excuse for delaying this vote. they are talking about the possibility of north korean sanctions. i support sanctions on north korea, but these sanctions passed overwhelmingly, strong bipartisan measure, should be passed immediately by the house. and i have to conclude, given no other reasonable explanation, that the white house's opposition is a major reason. >> you saw the president's tweet this morning. most politicians would have gone to a meeting like the one don junior attended in order to get info on an opponent. that's politics. the president's lawyer, jay sekulow yesterday, he repeatedly said, look, there was nothing illegal about that meeting, nothing wrong with that meeting. actually, nothing actually emerged from that meeting. don't make a big deal about it. and he also pointed out that the secret service, you know, wouldn't have allowed that meeting to go on if they didn't
clear people coming in. >> the secret service, i'm told, wasn't even providing protection to donald trump, jr. at that point in the campaign. >> but they did provide security at trump tower in new york to get in, you had to go through various metal detectors and you needed an excuse to get through there. >> and the secret service, with all due respect to the secret service, is not in charge of screening attendees at meetings in that way. they are in charge of security. if red flags go off, if metal detector sounds a signal, they can stop someone. >> was this a one-off meeting as far as you know? forget about speculation. were there other similar meetings during the campaign or during the transition? >> we know of no other meetings right now, wolf. and i want to emphasize that this meeting, as incriminating as it is in terms of evidence of
intent, state of mind, purpose, is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. we can't jump to conclusions here. but what it indicates is that the trump campaign was open to additional meetings. it sends a signal that they would come to other meetings if information illicitly obtained or otherwise from the russian government, and in furtherance of a potential criminal conspiracy. >> how does the judiciary committee, your committee, find out if there were any other meetings along those lines? >> there may be other e-mails. and there may be testimony. these witnesses are going to be coming under oath and there are enough of them that their stories will be corroborated by others who might have knowledge of them or e-mails. you know, we are here today on the 44th anniversary, literally, of alexander butterfield, a name lost to the myths of history,
coming before the watergate committee and disclosing for the first time the nixon secret tapes. that testimony was a bombshell in that investigation. things happen in investigations. 13 months after it started, the watergate break in, that information was disclosed. so, ultimately, we will depend on the special prosecutor for a criminal case. our committee will look at what can be done to prevent legislatively or otherwise this kind of interference in our elections and possible conspiracy on the part of americans to further it. >> senator, stand by. there is more we need to discuss. we'll take a quick break, resume our coverage right after this. tr visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics. yeah! now business is rolling in. get started at fastsigns.com.
♪ ♪ award winning interface. award winning design. award winning engine. the volvo xc90. the most awarded luxury suv of the century. this july visit your local volvo dealer to receive sommar savings of up to $4,500. this july visit your local volvo dealer if you have moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis like me, and you're talking to your rheumatologist about a medication... ...this is humira. this is humira helping to relieve my pain... ...and protect my joints from further damage. humira has been clinically studied for over 18 years. humira works by targeting and helping to... ...block a specific source...
...of inflammation that contributes to ra symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain and... ...stop further joint damage in many adults. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas... ...where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flulike symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. talk to your doctor and visit humira.com this is humira at work. hi..and i know that we have phonaccident forgiveness.gent, so the incredibly minor accident that i had tonight- four weeks without the car. okay, yup. good night. with accident forgiveness your rates won't go up just because of an accident. switching to allstate is worth it.
going somewhere? whoooo. here's some advice. tripadvisor now searches more than 200 booking sites to find the hotel you want and save you up to 30%. trust this bird's words. tripadvisor. i'm karen, i'm a teacher.olfer. my psoriatic arthritis caused joint pain. just like my moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. and i was worried about joint damage. my doctor said joint pain from ra can be a sign of existing joint damage that could only get worse. he prescribed enbrel to help relieve pain
and help stop further damage. enbrel may lower your ability to fight infections. serious, sometimes fatal, events including infections, tuberculosis, lymphoma, other cancers, nervous system and blood disorders, and allergic reactions have occurred. tell your doctor if you've been someplace where fungal infections are common, or if you're prone to infections, have cuts or sores, have had hepatitis b, have been treated for heart failure, or if you have persistent fever, bruising, bleeding, or paleness. don't start enbrel if you have an infection like the flu. joint pain and damage... can go side by side. ask how enbrel can help relieve joint pain and help stop joint damage. enbrel, fda approved for 18 years. of your back pain?trol new icyhot lidocaine patch. desensitizes aggravated nerves with the max strength lidocaine available. new icyhot lidocaine patch.
we're back with democratic senator richard blumenthal, he's the member of the senate judiciary and armed services committee. russia is demanding the return of two compounds seized during the final weeks of the obama administration in return for russia's meddling in the presidential election. and just now only moments ago after a meeting with u.s. officials here at the state department in washington, russia's deputy foreign minister was asked if the russians are going to be getting their compounds back and he said, and i'm quoting him now, almost, almost. what do you think about that, senator blumenthal? if he believes that almost, almost, those two compounds, one in suburban maryland outside of washington, d.c., a huge estate, another one outside of new york city, another huge estate, if they are going to be returned to the russians? >> these two compounds reportedly have been involved in russian spying and intelligence activity. to return them would be absolutely a disservice to our
nation and there's no way that these compounds should be returned. it would be contrary to the spirit if not the letter of the measure that we passed, because we said very explicitly that these sanctions, ongoing right now as a result of the obama executive order, should not be lifted without congress approving. and, so, i would strongly urge the president to resist these russian demands, which they have made before. you know, these talks between the state department and the deputy foreign minister started a week or a couple weeks ago, and they should be literally abandoned. >> but you know the russians are threatening to retaliate if those two compounds aren't returned in the final days of the obama administration seized those two compounds, expelled, 30, 35 russian diplomats, people serving as diplomats in the united states. the russians at the time did not retaliate. normally they do retaliate. they would expel american
diplomats from moscow, take over other, maybe the u.s. has a similar compound in moscow where diplomats can go spend a weekend with their family. they didn't do that then. potentially they could do that now. is that a credible threat? >> whether it's a credible threat or not, we cannot cave to these russian demands. in fact, we ought to be heightening the price that they pay, not reducing it. if we fail to make them pay a price and there is bipartisan agreement, very strongly and passionately on this point, they will do it again, and they should be told they will pay an even higher price. and what they understand is the force of sanctions. their economy is at a weak point. because of the plummeting energy prices. and what putin's agenda has been from the start of these secret meetings -- and it's indicated by the agenda of those people, the russian agents who came to
the meeting -- is lifting those sanctions. and sending them a message that, in effect, we will reduce the force, our taking of those compounds, impounding them, would be exactly the wrong message. >> senator, thanks for joining. >> thank you. >> senator richard blumenthal of connecticut. just ahead we'll talk more about the growing concerns about jared kushner and his security clearance. who is creating more political problems for the president, would it be his son-in-law or his son? and is the white house focusing now on american-made products a smart political move, a blatant distraction or both? analysts, our analysts and specialists are standing by. n o. you can see exactly when we'll arrive. i'm micah with safelite. customer: thanks for coming, it's right over here. tech: giving you a few more minutes for what matters most. take care. kids singing: safelite® repair, safelite® replace.
there's nothing more important than your health. so if you're on medicare or will be soon, you may want more than parts a and b here's why. medicare only covers about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you. you might want to consider an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company.
like any medicare supplement insurance plan, these help pick up some of what medicare doesn't pay. and, these plans let you choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. you could stay with the doctor or specialist you trust... or go with someone new. you're not stuck in a network... because there aren't any. so don't wait. call now to request your free decision guide and find the aarp medicare supplement plan that works for you. there's a range to choose from, depending on your needs and your budget. rates are competitive. and they're the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. like any of these types of plans, they let you apply whenever you want. there's no enrollment window... no waiting to apply.
so call now. remember, medicare supplement plans help cover some of what medicare doesn't pay. you'll be able to choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. whether you're on medicare now or turning 65 soon, it's a good time to get your ducks in a row. duck: quack! call to request your free decision guide now. because the time to think about tomorrow is today.
yeah, and i can watch thee bgame with directv now.? oh, sorry, most broadcast and sports channels aren't included. and you can only stream on two devices at once. this is fun, we're having fun. yeah, we are. no, you're not jimmy. don't let directv now limit your entertainment. xfinity gives you more to stream to more screens.
there are growing calls tonight for white house stein jer advisor and presidential son-in-law jared kushner be stripped of his security clearance. democrats are outraged, some republicans are expressing concern about kushner's attendance at a meeting with a lawyer linked to the kremlin as well as more than 100 other foreign contacts he failed to list in the security document. let's get some more from our experts and our analysts. ryan, what do these developments mean for jared kushner's security clearance? >> i'm not sure they mean a whole lot unless the president decides they mean something. i mean, the president does have pretty wide discretion over his own staff in the white house and whether they should be allowed to see highly classified information. now, as a lot of other experts
who have gone through this process point out, if you are just a normal member of the federal government and you fail to disclose contacts with, say, the russian ambassador, or agents, people who are presenting themselves as agents of the russian government to give you information as happened in the recently revealed meeting, and you lied about that, you wouldn't get a security clearance. so, i don't know that a lot of the pressure from the democrats is going to have a whole lot of impact unless the president decides that this is an issue. >> this is just one meeting that wasn't disclosed. there were other exchanges, other meetings that weren't disclosed by various trump officials who either had to recuse themselves or who got kicked out of the administration in the process. so, where does this one meeting, david, fit into the big picture? >> right, wolf, sessions and flynn met with kislyak, gorkof, donald trump meeting, having this big meeting we've all been
talking about. even though you have no ironclad evidence of criminality, you are just starting to see this cloud build of meetings with russians and nondisclosure, and it just makes the trump administration's narrative that there's nothing to see here disintegrate into thin air. clearly there is a pattern and it's just going to drive investigators and congress to look into this even further. >> can i just throw in one other meeting? remember, the most, probably the most alarming meeting was the one that happened after the election when there were discussions between kushner allegedly and the russian ambassador about setting up a back channel to the kremlin. so, if that did not get the white house to say, wait a second, maybe this person shouldn't have a security clearance, you know, i don't know that this campaign related meeting is going to. i mean, they have just decided that they don't care. >> they say the trump people, they weren't even sure who was going to be in this meeting and now the president's lawyer jay sekulow is saying, well, the
secret service didn't vet these people properly. >> right, so much spin, wolf, i feel dizzy. it's a little bit ridiculous, but the alternative explanations are just not very good for the trump camp and the trump counsel. because if you think about it, possible explanations here for why they took this meeting are either total incompetence, they didn't think through the fact that this could possibly be a way for russia to try to influence their campaign or insert themselves into the campaign. the alternative, that this was something more nefarious. so, they are trying to spin their way out of this but not doing a very good job of it clearly. >> let me get jeffrey tubin, our larry be legal analyst to weigh in. what about the trump reelection campaign, yes there is already a reelection campaign. it was formed on inauguration day. this reelection campaign is paying for donald trump, jr.'s lawyer? >> well, it is certainly legal for the trump committee, the campaign committee, to pay
donald trump, jr.'s legal fees as long as the investigation is related to the campaign. at least so far it seems to be. but you have to sort of really shake your head at the bravado of -- they have a lot of small contributors, you know, people giving 15, $20, $15 a month to the trump campaign so that this millionaire 39-year-old doesn't have to pay his own legal fees. most people who become enmeshed in investigations when they work in the white house, they have to pay for their own legal fees. but the trump family apparently feels entitled to have campaign contributors pay for it, even though obviously they could well afford it. but just in terms of legality, i don't think there is any problem at all. >> you know, what surprises me, jeffrey, is that jared kushner has had world class legal representation here in washington. jamie grel i can, a former
deputy attorney general during the clinton administration, someone you know and someone i know, that team, they were involved. how was it possible that on one security application he didn't fill in the right meetings, didn't fill it in on the second one, even a third one, how is that possible with legal representation like that? >> well, you know, just to state the obvious, i don't know what went on between jamie gare lek and jared kushner. but ultimately lawyers are dependent on their clients to tell the truth and to be forthcoming. and i have to believe that confronted with the form, jamie gare lek told jared kushner, fill it out accurately, but apparently he didn't do it. he didn't do it more than once. i think it also speaks perhaps to this sense of entitlement of the people in the trump family. they don't have to worry about these government forms. they don't have to pay their own
legal fees. they are operating by their own rules. but ultimately, sometimes, that comes back to bite you, and that certainly seems to be happening, at least to a certain extent now. >> we have a new theme this week from the white house. ryan, made in america. you heard the president earlier today speaking at length about the need to get products made in america, sell them in america, and avoid the trade imbalances. is that going to distract, take away from the russia investigation, the uproar over that? >> judging by my reading of the news today and watching tv, no. they have launched a series of these branded weeks. i think after the early months of the administration when they just didn't have a sort of week to week plan, they landed on this. part of it is because their agenda on the capitol hill is stalled. this can breakthrough the conversation. i think one of the ironies obviously people are pointing out today is that the one, the series of companies that probably would not qualify to be
at the white house today would be any trump-related companies. whether it's -- obviously trump himself has a history of manufacturing things overseas. his daughter ivanka makes most of her clothing line overseas. so, it's one of those events where they are taking a little bit of a political risk in putting this forward because it is a reminder of his own lack of consistency on this issue. trump and his family have been involved in making products for years and years, and many of them have been made overseas rather than in the united states. >> you know, david, the poll, the abc washington post poll came out, the president's job approval number 36%. that's the lowest in 70 years at the six-month mark of a new president. 36% job approval. the president tweeted this this morning. the abc washington post poll, even though almost 40% is not bad at this time, was just about the most inaccurate poll around election time. that's not exactly very accurate. >> no, it's not.
i got the numbers right here, wolf. the last poll before the election for washington post was 47 to 43 for clinton, and clinton actually won 48.2 to 46.1. very close. it didn't predict the electoral college obviously, but our polling has actually been pretty consistent and accurate on that point. so the president's tweet, i understand he wants to defend his 40% approval rating. that's not a matter of accuracy. that's where he is. >> 36% job approval does not necessarily help him a lot in trying to negotiate deals. >> no, it doesn't help him at all, wolf. especially when you consider that about a quarter of the people polled in this survey are strong supporters of donald trump, they'll support him no matter what. but the rest are really the people donald trump needs to be able to convince democrats, to be able to convince moderate democrats and republicans alike to come along with his agenda. if you don't have public support as president, you don't have a whole lot of leverage over democrats, over moderate republicans to tell them, you
should be doing what i want you to do. you should support my agenda. and you see that problem reflected in the way health care is playing out right now on capitol hill. >> just to state the obvious, 40 is not 36. i know we should all be used to this by now, but i will never get used to the fact the president of the united states gets up in the morning and tweets about a poll and then inaccurately states it. >> he said almost 40%. >> well -- >> rounding. >> if i were writing about a poll and i said almost 40, my i had -- editor would come back to me and say it's 36. >> almost 49.5. >> there you go. >> stand by. we have a lot more coming up. including the senate republican health care postponed once again while senator john mccain recovers from surgery. [ dog whimpers ]
flo: you're covered. and you've bundled your home and auto insurance, so you're saving a ton. come on. you don't want to start your new life in a dirty old truck. man #3: hey. man #1: whoa, whoa. flo: sorry. woman: oh. flo: you're safe. you're safe now. woman: i think i'm gonna pass out. can you stop using the bullhorn? flo: i don't make the rules. heri think i might burst..... totally immersed weekenders. whatever kind of weekender you are, there's a hilton for you. book your weekend break direct with hilton.com
the future of the republican senate health care bill very much up in the air tonight with a vote now postponed at least until next month, and a number of republican governors clearly skeptical of the bill. ryan, the vice-president mike pence met with a lot of republican and democratic governors at the national governors association meeting over the weekend in rhode island. how did that go? >> well, you know, judging by the fierce est statements about this bill which came from governor john case i can of ohio, he essentially said what
mike pence is saying about the bill as it relates to medicaid is not true. that is rare that you have, and obviously know the history between cakasic, governor of oh is saying pence, the way he is describing this bill on medicaid is simply not true. you have this dynamic where you have republicans from the four states, republican governors pressuring their republican senators to vote no on this. rob portman one of the senators from ohio is very, very important. so, pence is going to these governors trying to get them to sort of back off and let the republican senators vote their conscience. >> there are two republican governors already -- republican senators who said no. one more and it's over. ment other kawhi in this equation is governor sandoval in nevada who met one on one in a group with mike pence, some others at this meeting over the weekend. and he has been basically the
101st senator in this whole process because he has been exerting pressure on dean heller, the republican senator of nevada who is up for reelection in a very difficult spot on this bill. and he is a key swing vote. so, it really is some very, very difficult math. >> remember, the changes in the first bill to the second bill, the medicaid part did not change. so, those senators who said, we can't support this based on medicaid, they're going to have to come up with -- if they now support the bill, they're going to have to explain what changed. >> some white house officials already playing hardball with senator jeff flake of arizona because they're already talking to potential republican challengers to him if he were to oppose. >> right. it is going to make it harder for senator flake in his reelect. at the same time, in an earlier round of negotiations over the bill, outside groups favorable tro trump pacts put pressure on nevada senator dean heller and when ads against him to try to vote for the earlier version of the bill. that angered republicans in the senate.
saying look, let's not attack our own. it's a double edged sword for the administration. >> what happens, jeffrey, if the bill doesn't pass? >> that's a great question. i don't think anyone knows for sure. senator mcconnell has said he suggested that, well, if the bill fails, they will have to take some steps to sure up obamacare. that's hard for me to believe that the republican senate, and especially the republican house would ever agree to that. so, i think the only thing you can say for sure is it's liable to be a political and medical bit of trouble if there is no bill because both obamacare and the trump plan need some legislation, and nothing would be happening. >> do they just move on, rebecca, to infrastructure, developing infrastructure or tax cuts if this fails? >> well, there have been some republicans who have argued and
are still arguing that it was a mistake to start with health care. it was too difficult. you should have started with something like infrastructure. there has to be an expiration date or they're going to spend the entire first half of -- >> you can build bipartisan support to build new bridges and rails and airports. a lot of republicans and democrats would support that. >> infrastructure would put more pressure on democrats to sort of work with republicans. and as rebecca is saying, time is not on republican's side in this regard. september issues to be taken care of. you turn the corner next year they are thinking about reelections. >> elections getting closer. guys, stand by. much more coming up including the first-ever test firing of the pentagon's new silent invisible killer. this is a cnn exclusive. plus the luxury north korean department store that's a slush fund for kim jong-un and his nuclear ambitions.
my name is cynthia haynes and i am a senior public safety specialist for pg&e. my job is to help educate our first responders on how to deal with natural gas and electric emergencies. everyday when we go to work we want everyone to work safely and come home safely. i live right here in auburn, i absolutely love this community. once i moved here i didn't want to live anywhere else. i love that people in this community are willing to come together to make a difference for other people's lives. together, we're building a better california.
now a cnn exclusive, an upfront close at a new military laser that is silent, precise and deadly. jim sciutto has the details for us. this laser, jim, has a very important defense capability? >> it does. multiple targets, really. and it's currently deployed on a u.s. warship operating in the persian gulf for threats on the surface, in the air, aircraft, boats. but also, in the future possibly for missiles. even for targets in space. this is not science fiction, it's not experimental. it's at the disposal of a u.s. captain deployed today. in the sometimes hostile waters of the persian gulf looms the
u.s. navy's first -- in fact, the world's first active laser weapon. the l.a.s. is not sicience fiction but it's really to be fired at targets today by captain christopher wells and his crew. cnn was granted exclusive access to a test of the laser. >> it's more precise than a bullet. it's not like other weapons that we have where it's only good against air contacts or surface contacts or against ground-based targets. it's a very versatile weapon. >> reporter: l.a.w.s. begins with a weapon that moves by definition at the speed of light. for comparison, that is 50,000 times the speed of an incoming icbm. >> it's throwing massive amounts
of protons. >> reporter: cnn witnessed that speed and power firsthand. first, the crew launches the target and an incoming drone aircraft, a weapon in increasing use by iran, north korea, china, russia and other adversaries. immediately, the weapons team zeros in on its target. >> we don't have to lead a target. is it is a point and shoot. we see it, focus on it and can negate that target. >> reporter: then, in an instant, the drone lights up, sending the aircraft down to the sea. all of this from a silent and invisible killer. >> it operates in an invisible spectrum. you don't see the beam. it doesn't make any sound. it's completely silent and it's
incredibly effective at what it does. >> reporter: it's remarkably precise, minimizing collateral damage. in all, the 40 million dollar system needs to operate is electricity and a crew of three. no ammunition at all. the cost per use -- >> about a dollar a shot. >> reporter: today it's used to disable aircraft and small boats. >> it's designed with the intent of being able to encounter airborne and surface-faced threats and has improved itself at being incredible at that. >> reporter: however, the navy is already generating more significant targets into its cro crosshairs. however, commander and crew are already very much aware of the potential capabilities. >> i don't know. maybe. >> the u.s. is not the only
nation working with lasers. china, russia, iran, other nations, they have tested them out and not just a target down here on earth, as far away in space. and its distance, really -- >> a dollar a shot. the tomahawk cruise missile, it's a dollar. >> exactly. it's one reason the navy is particularly excited about it. >> thanks very much. good reporting from jim sciutto. international sanctions, meanwhile, are doing very little to slow down north korea. a luxury store serves as kim junk un's personal slush fund. >> reporter: premium liquor stores stacked five rows high, imported chews, expensive per f fumes inside north korea. part of a year-long
investigation. >> foreigners and rich guys of pyongyang. >> reporter: how rich? you can buy a $4,000 watch and it's cash only. rich north koreans paying in 100 dollar notes. a north korean defector helped get illicit goods into the court. there is a secretive organization that the u.s. treasury says works as a slush fund for kim jong-un. north koreans working abroad, hotels in pyongyang, all of it a sprawling mafia-style cash earner for the supreme leader. >> most profitable businesses, the best companies belong to 39 and it's kim family business.
it doesn't belong to the cabinet or state control. >> reporter: he says it keeps rich party loyalists loyal to kim jong-un and the money in revenue helps fund kim's nuclear ambitions. >> they earn a lot of dollars in foreign cash from this luxurious department stores by selling all these goods and, you know, they reallocate these stores into their priorities, like nuclear missiles. >> so a luxury purchase could help build a missile? >> sure. >> reporter: office 39 works in complex ways using multiple fronts. the trump administration wants to cut off the money flow. >> the north koreans are building a brand-new golden
mall. >> good report from david. thank you very much. that's it for me. thanks very much for watching. i'm wolf blitzer in "the situation room." erin burnett "outfront" starts right now. "outfront" next, sean spicer still insisting donald trump jr.'s meeting with the russian lawyer was about adoption. why can't the white house get its stories straight? and why he says the u.s. is, quote, closed to a laughing stock and the white house fights back. he's my guest tonight. and ann coulter shames delta airlines and a passenger but did delta get the last laugh? let's go "outfront." i'm erin burnett. "outfront" tonight, ignoring the proof. the white house press secretary sean spicer today sticking with a talking point that defies evidence and