tv CNN Newsroom With Ana Cabrera CNN October 28, 2017 1:00pm-2:00pm PDT
top of the hour. you're in the "cnn newsroom." so glad you could join us. we begin with a major development in the special counsel investigation being led by robert mueller. cnn was the first to report that a grand jury has now approved the very first charges in this investigation and that anyone indicted could be arrested as early as monday. again, this is the investigation that was launched after president trump fired former fbi
director james comey. mueller's team has been looking into when the trump campaign colluded with russia and whether president trump obstructed justice. we all know mueller has been investigating key trump associates. i want to get the latest now from cnn she money. do you know who has been charged? could it be more than one person? >> reporter: yeah, it could be more than one person, anna. we don't know exactly who is facing charges, who has been indicted and who will likely appear in court on those charges on monday. we have reached out to various lawyers, different lawyers that are involved that are representing clients who are under investigation, and they have told us some of them have told us they have not been asked to surrender their clients. so they don't know what's happening. and others we've called have not returned our calls. so it's really a mystery, somewhat of a mystery to us as to who is going to face these
charges. we have heard some names, but because we've been unable to verify them with their attorneys and some other people, we've chosen not to report that. so it is sort of a mystery and hopefully, we're hoping with maybe perhaps tomorrow night or early monday morning we'll learn who is facing charges. >> you're reporting that arrests could come as soon as monday. why the delay if these charges or this indictment we know happened yesterday? >> yes. that's probably -- so one of the reasons, and that's a great question. one of the reasons is because these charges were filed yesterday, we believe from what we've been told that the charges were filed yesterday, there has to be a process put in place to, a., arrest someone and b, also the court process needs to begin. usually when there's an arrest, it's followed by the kwort process. friday we don't know when the indictments were handed up. we don't know when they were
exactly filed. so it would seem that on friday it would have been too late to make an arrest and then also to have the court proceeding. once someone is arrested, there's a process. it takes a few hours. there's process, fingerprints, photos taken. that all takes a couple of hours. and then you need to set up a date for court. and usually that happens in the same day. and then you go through an arraignment and what they call a presentment and you're formally told what the charges are. and then they just go ahead and move forward with the case and there will be a trial date set presumably, you know, sometime in the future. but, you know, it's hard to do something to have an indictment on the same day as an arrest and then a presentment. it usually takes a few days to set up. >> boy, a lot of anticipation for monday. amazing reporting. thank you very much. >> you're welcome. >> the white house is not commenting on this major news about the first indictments in mueller's investigation. ned, the administration is focusing on hillary clinton this weekend. let's get right to outside the
white house. what is the administration saying about clinton in the midst of this big news about the forthcoming indictments? >> hey, there, anna. very quickly i just wanted to mention the president just returned to the white house from trump national golf course in sterling, virginia, where he spent the day. no public events for the white house today. but as you said, there's no comment so far on these developments coming out of the special investigation led by robert mueller. any mention of collusion with russia is being directed, as you said, toward the president's former adversary in the 2016 campaign, hillary clinton. sarah sanders tweeting this out earlier today, writing in part, quote, clinton spokesman just said he's damn glad clinton campaign colluded with russia to spread disinformation about the president and to influence the election. the evidence the clinton campaign dnc and russia colluded to influence the election is
indisputable. that damn glad quotation comes from brian fallon, former campaign spokesperson for hillary clinton. he was talking about the hiring of fusion gps to gather opposition research on donald trump by one of clinton's campaign attorneys. beyond all of that, anna, the house announced this week, some house republicans that there would be an investigation into a uranium deal that was made with russia when hillary clinton was secretary of state. the president is not only accusing hillary clinton of taking bribes from the russians in order to make that a more favorable deal for them, cnn has learned that the white house is going a step further and they are pressing staffers to work with the department of justice to allow for a former fbi informant with knowledge of that deal to testify. and on top of that, the president is now pushing for any remaining e-mails that are still sealed from hillary clinton's time as secretary of state to be released.
so while the white house you would imagine would be on the defensive from the news coming from the special investigation, they are fully on the offensive, focused on on opponent that they defeated only 12 months ago. >> thank you. i want to talk more about this special counsel indictment, what it could mean. joining us cnn legal analyst paul cal lynn. he is a former new york city prosecutor and also with us is cnn contributor and donald trump buyographer michael dean tono. so, paul, let's talk about this indictment. what could it mean? what is the burden of proof to get to this point? >> well, a grand jury has to find that there's probable cause that a crime was committed and that a certain person committed the crime. and if that's achieved and a majority of the grand jurors -- usually there are 23 sitting grand jurors. and if a majority of those choose to vote the indictment, then an indictment is handed down. now, it's different than proof beyond a reasonable doubt at the time of trial, which is a much higher standard. >> so that would be the next step. >> yes. the case will go forward to
trial, unless, of course, that the purpose of this indictment is to put pressure on people to flip or turn or cooperate with the prosecutor. the prosecutor may now say, you see, i wasn't bluffing. i was -- when i said i was going to indict you, i meant it, unless you're willing to cooperate with us and give us useful information. so deals may still be negotiated before a final trial occurs. >> michael, it's interesting that the president has not made any comment on this when we've seen him tweet so seemingly unrestrained way throughout the mueller investigation, trying to poke holes in his credibility. do you find it interesting that he's been silenced on this? >> well, i'm not especially surprised because this is the one thing that president trump and prior to that businessman donald trump dreaded, the idea of getting into a legal
proceeding where there's actually judgment based on fact and there's fact finding done by prosecutors and the court. these are all things he's avoided very carefully his entire life. he likes to advocate for himself in a salesman's kind of way, but not in the legal realm. so it may well be that his attorneys are finally talking some sense to him and saying, look, this is very dangerous territory for you to explore. >> paul, what do you think this means about where the investigation is at? >> well, i think it's possible that when this indictment is handed down, we'll see a road map as to where the investigation is going. but i will say that the special prosecutor here, special counsel mueller, has only been operating for about five months. so to be handing down an indictment after only five months means he's moving with rapid speed. that suggests to me that this
may be a special prosecutor investigation that's going to wrap up within the next six months or so, maybe certainly sometime in 2018. you know, some of them have gone on for years. there was one that went on for five years. so this means mueller is working hard and he's pushing forward quickly with the investigation. >> i want to ask you about the timing, michael, because all week as boris reported, the white house has been trying to change the narrative and republicans too who are even part of some of these russian investigations in congress, they've been now honing in on hillary clinton and kroefrgsz involve her and the past administration. do you think the timing is just a coincidence? >> you know, it might be, but this is a method the president has used all of his life. if you can use an enemy, in this case hillary clinton, and a word like russia and investigation, you mash them all together and whether they make any censsense
not when you examine them closely is not the point. it's all about distracting and raising some doubt in the public mind. he's very good at this. we should not under estimate the effect of this. you remember there was lying ted and then there was lying hillary and he wrote those messages right into the white house. so in this case i think there's a political agenda at work. i don't see how it helps him legally, but where the public is concerned, it's probably an effective strategy. >> paul, what is the range of information we might actually get from this indictment? is it just going to be a name and a charge or might we get more? >> well, that's a great question. and i will tell you that federal indictments customarily are very, very detailed. they kind of lay out the whole story with a lot of detail. much more so than you see in state cases. now, is he going to be coy about this and do a bare bones indictment because the only reason he's dieting is to put
pressure on the suspect or maybe to send a message to others, for instance, let's say there's an indictment for lying to the fbi, which is a federal crime, or lying to federal investigators. maybe mueller is sending an investigation to others in the white house, you'd better be telling me the troourtd when you submit to interviews or the grand jury because you're facing perjury or lying to the fbi charges. so it depends on what mueller's strategic reason is for landing down this early indictment. >> so more information might signal. >> more information might signal that it's not a send the message indictment. he's put his case together, he was ready to diet this suspect. maybe he was getting close to the statute of limitations running on some early suspects. i was looking at the statute of limitations last night, and, you know something? some tax charges that could be brought against some of the suspects will expire very soon. so he was under pressure to move against some suspects earlier than others. so there are a lot of possibilities here, and we won't really know until the indictment
is handed down. >> and hold your thought on that because i want to come back to that timing and the possibility of charges. but first i do want to ask you, michael, because you know the president so well, what do you think his best case scenario he would wake up to on monday? >> oh, i think he would like to see a charge against someone on a lower level of the campaign. even if it is paul manafort, who many have talked about, and he was briefly the campaign chairman, if it's related to taxes, related to something prior to the campaign, that would be his best case. bullet i agree with paul that it does look like mueller is moving very rapidly and in some ways that does deprive the president of some of his political criticisms. you know, they have been talking a bit in the republican realm about, well, this is costing too much. >> right. >> it's going on and we're
worried. this goes against that. >> suggesting that it was going nowhere and they're just throwing a bunch of money at this investigation. >> right. >> that was the cost piece that we heard this week. but paul, when you talk about the statute of limitations, remember that was something that came up initially about how broad the scope of the investigation could possibly be. so are you saying -- i mean, it is possible that we might see a charge -- and again, this is just theoretical -- against paul manafort from a decade ago, so not something he did during the campaign and perhaps not even specific to russia. maybe other financial crimes. >> yes. that's absolutely true, anna, because remember, the charge that was given to the special prosecutor was to investigate possibility of collusion with the russians in interfering with the american election or matters arising from the investigation. so if you come across a crime while you're investigating something, it can become relevant. upon, the clinton investigation began as an investigation of a land deal and it wound up with
impeachment proceedings based on monica lewinski. >> who wasn't even part of the picture when that investigation began. >> no one had even heard of her. and i think the thing the president is going to be worried about, if manafort is dieted let's say for tax reasons or for money laundering or something like that, something that was part of manafort's business before he got involved with trump, does that mean that some of trump's businesses, which were in operation before he ran for president, may now become the subject of the investigation arising from? and are they looking at, for instance, were russian ol garks putting money into trump golf courses or real estate and did that create a relationship that enabled the trumps to reach out to the russians when they ran for office. you can see how you could stitch together a picture that would make it relevant. >> and that could all be tied into eventually the election itself in terms of leverage -- >> exactly. and the president has said, you know, his red line is if you start investigating the family business, you know, he thinks
mueller has crossed the red line. so i have a feeling mueller is going to cross that line. >> where this goes is anybody's guess at this point. paul and michael, thank you both. what an interesting conversation, no doubt. we'll have you both back as we continue. coming up, president trump taking credit for koing that term fake news. ahead, i'll talk to an author who says he sees signs of authoritarianism in the president's attacks on the media.
the ceramides in cerave. they help restore my natural barrier, so i can lock in moisture and keep us protected. we've got to have each other's backs and fronts. cerave. what your skin craves. and fronts. and the wolf huffed like you do sometimes, grandpa? well, when you have copd, it can be hard to breathe. it can be hard to get air out, which can make it hard to get air in. so i talked to my doctor. she said... symbicort could help you breathe better, starting within 5 minutes. symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. symbicort helps provide significant improvement of your lung function. symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort contains formoterol. medicines like formoterol increase the risk of death from asthma problems. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. you should tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. symbicort could mean a day with better breathing.
watch out, piggies! (child giggles) symbicort. breathe better starting within 5 minutes. get symbicort free for up to one year. visit saveonsymbicort.com today to learn more. i'm in the kitchen. i need my blood sugar to stay in control. i need to shave my a1c i'm always on call. an insulin that fits my schedule is key. ♪ tresiba® ready ♪ (announcer) tresiba® is used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. don't use tresiba® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. don't share needles or insulin pens. don't reuse needles. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which may cause dizziness, swtiting, confusion, and headache. check your blood sugar. low blood sugar can be serious and may be life-threatening.
injection site reactions may occur. tell your prescriber about all medicines you take and all your medical conditions. taking tzds with insulins like tresiba® may cause serious side effects like heart failure. your insulin dose shouldn't be changed without asking your prescriber. get medical help right away if you have trouble breathing, fast heartbeat, extreme drowsiness, swelling of your face, tongue, orhrhroat, dizziness, or confusion. ask your health care provider if you're tresiba® ready. covered by most insurance and medicare plans. ♪ tresiba® ready ♪ strong words today by the u.s. defense secretary aimed at north korea just ahead of a visit by president donald trump to asia this week. james mattis declared any attack by north korea on the u.s. or its allies will be defeated. during a visit to seoul, south korea, the defense secretary insisted the u.s. will not accept a nuclear north korea. mattis warned that any use of nuclear weapons by the north
would be met with a, quote, massive military response that is effective and overwhelming. now, as the president prepares to head to the region, north korean officials say they will not give up their nuclear program. cnn's will ripley is in pyongyang to explain. >> reporter: as asia preparation for president trump's landmark visit, north korea has been uncharacteristicly quiet. no missile launches in a month and a half. no nuclear test, at least not yet. only north korea's promise to send a clear message after trump's menacing speech at the u.n. last month when he threatened to totally destroy north korea. at the time north korean leader kim jong-un vowed to tame the u.s. president with fire. chief engineer of a baby food factory, trying to maintain production levels despite u.n. sanctions over north korea's nuclear program. but he says the nukes are here
to stay. president trump knows nothing about the korean nation, he says. now he's asking us to give up our nuclear weapons, ask anyone on the street and they'll say he's a lunatic. his words echo north korean propaganda. anti-trump posters are all over pyongyang. u.s. and north korean officials say diplomacy has broken down as the rhetoric has revved up. pushing two nuclear powers further down a dangerous path. both sides not rule out talks altogether, but their positions couldn't be farther apart. on a visit friday to the demilitarized zone dividing north and south korea, u.s. defense secretary james mattis said america's goal is not war. >> thank you. >> but for a nuclear free korean peninsula. with pyongyang closer than ever to achieving what it considers a nuclear balance of power with the u.s., giving up nukes is a nonstarter. >> but, you know, there are a lot of people around the world who think that by accumulating
nuclear weapons your country is putting itself at risk of total destruction. they have the wrong information, says pokian ak. tell them to come to my country and see for themselves. do you have hope that someday your leader kim jong-un could meet the u.s. president donald trump? no, not at all, she says. that meeting cannot happen. it will not happen, because our marshall promised to deal with that deranged lunatic with fire. ominous words slowly simmering ever since as trump's visit to the region looms, many wonder if the situation is about to boyle over. will ripley, cnn, pyongyang, north korea. >> all right. take you to spain now. separate tisz in catalonia have been dealt a crushing blow in their attempt to win independence from spain. on friday spanish officials dismissed the autonomous region's president, cabinet and dissolved its parliament. a spokesperson for the spanish
government told reuters, quote, it looks as if they proclaimed the republic of catalonia, but 24 hours after, who has actually recognized it? no one. that's it. spain's deputy prime minister has officially been placed in control of catalonia and the country's prime minister is calling for new regional elections now on december 21st. still ahead, the department of homeland security unveiled several prototype for the president's proposed border wall with mexico. but will they actually work? you're live in the "cnn newsroom." you might take something for your heart... or joints. but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish, prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember. ...from godaddy! in fact, 68% of people who have built their... ...website using gocentral, did it in under an hour, and you can too. build a better website - in under an hour. with gocentral from godaddy.
pabut with odor free blue-emu continuous pain relief spray, i can box out any muscle or joint pain immediately. blue-emu continuous pain relief spray, it works fast and you won't stink. how much money do you think you'll need in retirement? then we found out how many years that money would last them. how long do you think we'll keep -- oooooohhh! you stopped! you're gonna leave me back here at year 9? how did this happen? it turned out, a lot of people fell short, of even the average length of retirement. we have to think about not when we expect to live to, but when we could live to. let's plan for income that lasts all our years in retirement. prudential. bring your challenges.
whentertaining us,es getting us back on track,hing? and finding us dates. phones really have changed. so why hasn't the way we pay for them? introducing xfinity mobile. you only pay for data and can easily switch between pay per gig and unlimited. no one else lets you do that. see how much you can save. choose by the gig or unlimited. xfinity mobile. a new kind of network designed to save you money. call, visit or go to xfinitymobile.com.
walls have gone up along a short stretch of the u.s. border with mexico. eight prototype walls commissioned by the trump administration officially unveiled this week. and one of them could serve as the blueprint to carry out president trump's vision for the border. cnn's miguel mark easy explains. >> reporter: president trump said he wanted a big fat beautiful wall. these are his 30 by 30 foot options. one of these eight contestants could soon stretch 2,000 miles across the border. >> there's a chance that one of them gets selected. eight of them get selected or a mix of their characteristics get selected for construction. >> reporter: they sit like giant tombstones just east of san diego in the no man's land right on the u.s. mexico border. the president has consistently said a wall will be built along the entire border. >> he says 2,000 miles a border wall. you say -- >> we'll put it up where we need
to. >> well, there's testimony already out there. there was a testimony by the former. >> right. >> chief of homeland security, which was general kelly in which he in testimony said that you won't see a wall from sea to shining sea. we will put the wall where it makes sense. >> customs and border patrol referring to the jam john kelly who is now the president's chief of staff. the cost for just these test walls? $20 million. building any one of them across the entire 2,000 mile border could cost more than 20 billion. >> beyond this, whether the 20 billion to build the entire wall comes, that's for another day. >> so right now our focus is to complete the process of construction of the prototype. >> so the prototype or the contestants or the president's big beautiful wall, they're done, but it's going to take another month for the cement to dry and for the walls to settle before they can be tested.
and then they'll go at them, seeing whether they can be scaled, climbed, dug under or breached. you will test these walls to their maximum. >> correct. >> on the mexican side of the border, building of the prototype met with disbelief. >> so when you see these, what do they represent to you? >> for our country, we think it's -- >> victor clark, a mexican citizen who teaches border issues at san diego state university says a 30 foot wall would deter migrants, but not everything. >> will a 30 foot wall 2,000 miles long stop drugs coming into the u.s.? >> well, drugs enter through the u.s. in different ways, through port of entries, through sea, by land. >> and tunnels. lots of them. >> if we can take a picture of the land, of the ground underneath us, what would it look like? >> with a lot of tunnels, obviously. probably in this moment somebody is building a tunnel. >> at least some of these walls come with tunnel deterrence too. big beautiful walls above and
below ground. miguel mark easy, cnn. >> coming up, secretary of state nikki haley says extremism in africa could be a real threat to the u.s. these comments come as we're learning new details about that deadly ambush in niger that left four american soldiers dead. why they were there and how they got separated when heavily armed militants attacked their convoy. ♪ this is a story about mail and packages. and it's also a story about people. people who rely on us every day to deliver their dreams they're handing us more than mail they're handing us their business and while we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country, we never forget... that your business is our business the united states postal service. priority: you ♪
welcome back to the "cnn newsroom." u.s. ambassador to the u.n. nikki haley has now wrapped up a three nation tour of africa amid escalating terms of extremism in that part of the world. in an exclusive interview with cnn's global affairs correspondent, ambassador hailey talks about how extremism in africa could impact the u.s. >> these african countries and
all countries, if they take care of their people, if they respect the voices of their people, then you get true democracy. if they don't listen to the voices of their people, conflict will erupt, extremism will happen, and the united states will have to deal with it. this is all about making sure we don't get to that point. >> this as we are learning more details now about that deadly october 4th ambush in niger. sources tell cnn the u.s. troops became separated during the fire fight and attempted to mount a counter attack. cnn's ryan brown has been following all the details. and ryan, what have we learned now about what these u.s. troops were up against in this battle? >> well, anna, we know that they were up against a larger, better armed force of some 50 isis affiliated fighters, u.s. intelligence believes it's a group called isis in the greater sahara and they were armed with rocket propelled grenades, mortars, heavy machine guns. facing a smaller u.s. niger an
force with just their personal rifles. yet despite this forces were able to mount a counter attack and kill 20 isis militants. early on one of their vehicle was disabled. the u.s. force was split in two. they lost communication with one another. adding to the confusion of this battle. ask we are told that one of the groups that was separated had the u.s. casualties in it. a lot of yugs here in this very intense fire fight in this remote part of niger. >> what about the timeline on sergeant la david johnson? have you learned any more about why he was missing for a whole 48 hours before his body was recovered? >> well, that's the main question that the investigation, which is being led by a two star general from africa command, is looking at. one thing we know is actually the white house was initially told that all four soldiers could be missing. that was in the initial reports. that was later revised by the military to three killed in action with only one missing, and that's, of course, sergeant
la david johnson. so, again, what they're trying to find out is how -- there was some movement between bt two groups. they were on foot. they were in vehicles. so they're just trying to find out how he was missing for that length of time. >> and there was coordination, obviously of the isis affiliated fighters seems to suggest that they are well trained and organized. is the u.s. currently prepared to counter the isis factions in niger and other african regions? >> well, that's something u.s. military planners are looking at. they've done about 30 patrols in this area without encountering enemy contact. the force was not a capture kill operational force. they were not given that mission. this was a reconnaissance patrol force. not expecting enemy contact. the u.s. military has requested armed drones for niger. it's a request that has not been granted yet by the nigerien government. that's something they've been working on for some time because of this threat. and they're work on the ground it with even greater urgency in the wake of this attack. >> ryan brown, thank you for that. still ahead, i'll talk to one
author who says he sees signs of authoritarian in the president's attacks on the media and others. you're live in the "cnn newsroom." don't go away. >>yeah, 5 years already. 5 years, hmm. you ever call your broker for help? >>once, when volatility spiked... and? >>by the time they got me an answer, it was too late. td ameritrade's elite service team can handle your toughest questions right away- with volatility, it's all about your risk distribution. good to know. >>thanks, mike. we got your back kate. >>does he do that all the time? oh yeah, sometimes he pops out of the couch. help from real traders. only with td ameritrade.
president trump is patting himself on the back for, quote, this whole fake news thing. the president says one of his biggest accomplishments since taking office 280 days ago is convincing everyday americans that news media reporting is fake. watch. >> i've really started this whole fake news thing. now, they've turned it around and now they're calling stories
put out by facebook fake and they're fake. what can be more fake than cbs and nbc and cnn. when you look at some of these stories and you look at the level of approval of media, of general media. if you look at it from the day i started running to now, i'm so proud that i have been able to convince people how fake it is, because it has taken a nosedive. >> freedom of the press, established by our founding father's, as a key pillar of american democracy. what happens when the nation's leader encourages disbelief in a fundamental american institution of the let's talk it over with yale history professor timothy snierd. the author of the book on tyranny. 20 lessons from the 20th century. you say you see signs of authoritarianism in the president's attacks on the media. >> it's interesting in the words that he just used he actually provided us with fake news because the idea of fake news
comes from russia. that very term fake news existed in russia and ukrainian years before it came to the u.s. so his very idea that he invented it is wrong. but of course, that gives us a tip to where the real problem is. the real problem is that anytime a leader says that journalism is not important, fact wallet is not important, he's undermining all of the other institutions. he's making it impossible for us to have a rule of law state, impossible for us to have civil society. this is the first move that author to her yans always make. >> interesting. but yet we've seen other administrations in the past take issue with media reports. so what makes him and his administration different? >> yeah. great question. it's normal if you're a president or if you're in the congress to have controversy with the media. the founding father's foresaw that. and from washington onward, every single president has had tension with the press. what's different about mr. trump is that he says the entire press is a bad idea, referring to the press as the enemies of the
people and suggesting that the press should just go away is actually unprecedented in american history. it is different. >> do you think, though, part of the difference comes with the fact that it's the age of social media, so i mean, there are so many outlets out there and streams of information? >> yeah. that's a big difference, because it's very easy for us now to just look on the screen and find the stuff that we like. and it's very easy to be confused between what we want to hear and what the truth actually is. because the truth is always a little bit uncomfortable. it always teaches us. the there's always a little bit of frik. but that's all the more reason for a president and all responsible politicians to insist on just how important real journalism is rather than doing the opposite. >> are there other actions that you've seen this president take that concern you? >> oh, absolutely. i mean, in addition to being against the freedom of the press and factual itself, we have a president who is unconcerned with the use of language. we have a president who is willing to use language to turn one group of americans against another group of americans.
we have a president who refers to judges as so-called judges. we have a president who add myers foreign dictators and say that the way that things are done in places like russia or north korea is better than the u.s. of course there are many reasons for concern. >> and yet has he really done anything to erode our democratic institutions? i mean, he may tack a big game, throw out a lot of threats, tweet at people these attacks, but at the end of the day he largely hasn't been able to dictate his agenda. isn't that a sign of democracy working. >> well, the fact that he hasn't made policy i don't find all that reassuring because what mr. trump has been able to do is change the nature of government. we no longer expect that the federal government will make policy. what we expect is aconstant treem of more or less artificial emergencies. what we spend our time doing is getting excited by this foreign mnl, this domestic crisis, this violent use of words. we're getting accustomed to a new political reality where the job of government is no longer to hip us but to get us upset.
i would say that is actually a change in our system. >> that's fascinating. this just kind of blew my mind. this week when the president was up on the hill meeting with members of his party discussing tax reform, he was asked about that meeting and this was his take-away. let's watch. >> i called it a love fest. it was almost a love fers. main it was a love fest. but -- standing ovations. there is great unity. i mean, if you look at the democrats with bernie sanders and hillary clinton, that's a mess. >> he seems to care a lot about praise and what people think of him. >> yeah. that's extremely dangerous because the last thing the press can do is praise a leader. the reason why we have the first amendment is that the founding father's understood that there has to be constant factual reassessment and criticism. that will be personally annoying for the president, but the president is not a person. the president is the head of state and the head of government. and so it's the job of the
president not to have those personal feelings. in fact, it's the job of the president to use what he learns from journalists rather than to criticize them. >> and yet just this week we talk about people falling in line, praising the president. we saw a couple of republican senators, members of his own party speak out strongly against the president. watch this. >> we must never regard as normal the regular and casual undermining of our democratic norms and ideals. we must never meekly the daily sunday erg of our country. the personal attacks, the threats against principles, freedoms and institution, the flag rant disregard for truth and decency. the reckless provocations, most often for the pettiest and most personal reasons, reasons having nothing whatsoever to do with the fortunes of the people that we have been elected to serve. >> so that's senator flake expressing concerns about the
democracy, but safe to say that sort of thing doesn't happen in authoritarian regime. >> right. which is exactly why it's a very good thing there's a free press. if members of the opposition, if people in the resistance and if members of mr. trump's own party didn't have access to the press, we wouldn't know about those words. those words wouldn't be the beginning of a discussion. the reason why heads of state try to attach down on the press and try to replace the free press with their own press is so that they can margin eyes dissenting voices so they can hog the middle and make criticism seem irrelevant. it's a very good thing that that hasn't happened yet. what you've shown is just one little reminder of what it wouldn't be like if we didn't have that. >> i want to ask you about what we are focusing on today. today's news about this grand jury indictment related to the special counsel investigation that's focused on the president and his campaign and obstruction of justice potentially. you know, it has come up the
idea of the president either pardoning people who may be indicted and or even firing the special counsel. what do you make of this? >> this is one more reason why it's very important we have a free press. when you're facing a constitutional crisis with unprecedented problems, it's a very good thing we're free to discuss it. one unprecedented problem is that a foreign nation interfered in our elections, interfered directly in our sovereignty. we're still getting used to that. we need the press to be able to talk about that. second unprecedented problem, the notion of a president pardoning himself, which is a little bit like borrowing money from yourself. it doesn't make that much sense to me. but it's clearly the first step towards a constitutional crisis and without the press and without the lawyers talking in the free press, we'll have no idea how to deal with that. >> timothy snierd, thank you so much for joining us. really appreciate it. coming up, the president and the first lady aren't known for public displays of affection, but things seem to be warming up. we'll have the details next.
first it all started with broken luggage at the airport and now these two entrepreneurs are building a travel brand millennials seem to love. but the trip isn't without challenges. >> our first product, aa suitcase came from a personal pain point. my luggage broke. i was at the airport and all of my clothes just spilled out everywhere. and she called me to explain and she started being like why isn't there a brand that makes really high quality products that's not going to braic and that doesn't cost more than the trip i'm taking it on. we surveyed hundreds and hundreds of people who could potentially be our customers and that really drove the design. the suitcase has a hard shell, really durable zippers, perfect wheels, and the phone charger in the carry on. we've had so many failures with the way we've under amend our growth potential so many times and then we're completely out of inventory. early on we didn't have a
totally dialed interview process. we ended upbringing a few people on to the team who weren't the right fit. we have built something and are now responsible for all of these peoples' lively hoods. that kind of responsibility is really overwhelming at times, but it's also what inspires us to keep the company growing.
you might take something for your heart... or joints. but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish, prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember. pai'm open to that.medicare? lower premiums? extra benefits? it's open enrollment. time to open the laptop... ...and compare medicare health plans. why? because plans change, so can your health needs. so, be open-minded. look at everything-like prescription drug plans... and medicare advantage plans from private insurers. use the tools at medicare.gov. or call 1-800-medicare. open to something better? start today. ♪
(avo) if you'rand you've triedlly pain any number of laxatives, probiotics, and fiber, it could be wearing on you. tell your doctor what you've tried and how long you've been at it. linzess works differently from laxatives. linzess treats adults with ibs with constipation or chronic constipation. it can help relieve your belly pain and lets you have more frequent and complete bowel movements that are easier to pass. do not give linzess to children less than six, and it should not be given to children six to less than eighteen. it may harm them. don't take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain, especially with bloody or black stools. the most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe. if it's severe stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away. other side effects include gas, stomach-area pain, and swelling. ask your doctor if 90 days of linzess
>> the president and first lady were all smiles at each other. no big deal, you say in well, have you seen melania unsmile after her husband turned his back at the inauguration, but as the first lady added some empathy to the opioid announce am, she and the president repeatedly exchanged smiles. he patted her back. >> i have been participating -- >> again the proud smile, the exchanged glance. >> i'm so proud to support him today. >> and then the outstretched arms, the warm kiss on the cheek and some nuz ling, another kiss, a pat and just when you thought it was over, a lingering gaze and a nod and another touch. this was a presidential pda never before seen in this administration. usually comedians are making fun of body language like the trump's marital handshake. >> donald trump.
>> he shut her down like a robot from west -- you can go sit down. >> if it wasn't the handshake, it was the infamous hand swat. steven colbert's late show then added its own handy work. this cat and mouse hand play has now given way to him touching her back and her reciprocating the gesture. melania still looked like a model, but not a mannequin. jeany moos, cnn, new york.
>> we're live in the "cnn newsroom." thanks for spending part of your weekend with us. no comment. that's the official response from the white house to a landmark moment in the trump russia saga as reported first right here on cnn. a federal grand jury in washington has now approved the first charges in the investigation led by special counsel robert mueller. plans have also been made for anyone charged to be taken into custody as soon as monday. that could make this quite the weekend for all those involved as well as for the white house. we have a team of analysts standing by, but i do want to begin with someone who helped break this story, cnn crime and justice reporter. is it possible actually, anna, o believe that the people who have been charged or the person that was charged is not aware of it yet. we've talked to some lawyers who are representing some of the people who are being -- who are under investi