tv Reliable Sources CNN December 3, 2017 8:00am-9:00am PST
example, and $5 billion on black friday in 2017. singles day is celebrated on november 11th. 11/11 or 1111. and it took on special significance in 2011. that was, of course, 11/11/11. lots of singles. athanks for being part of my program this week. hey, i'm brian stelter. it's time for "reliable sources." is this is our weekly look at the story behind the story. how the media really works. and how the news gets made. right now, the news is overwhelming. confusing. and sometimes frightening. four of president trump's associates have now been charged by special counsel, robert mueller. michael flynn, as of friday, has admitted to committing a crime while working in the white house. meantime, the president is attacking the fbi, and trying to discredit the mueller probe. his media allies working overtime to help him.
they're trying to help him cover up the disturbing connections that do exist between trump world and russia. every single day, journalists are uncovering new links between the two. meantime, at home you're probably wondering if your taxes are going to go up or going to go down. amid all the deceptive claims about the gop tax bill. right now, the biggest challenge for newsrooms -- i can't say this loudly enough. the biggest challenge is to cut through the craziness and explain what's going on in clear, accurate language. we need to start with the basics. we need to exercise a lot of caution and precision, without shying away from the truth. we need to describe the crisis that we are seeing with our own eyes. this moment calls for more explainers. more time lines. more summaries. more fact-checks. to help the audience, to help all of you at home. we in the media need to write our stories, not to impress each other, but to inform you. to inform an increasingly worried public.
and above all else, we need to protect our credibility at all costs. which brings me to the two big stories we're covering this hour. nbc firing matt lauer. and abc suspending brian ross. these are two very different cases, to be sure. lauer accused of sexual misconduct. ross admitting to sloppy journalism. but both lead to a common result. questions about the credibility and the accountability of the people who deliver us the news. of course, trump is exploiting both cases on twitter. and we'll get to lauer and to trump a little later. but first to ross. the breaking news this weekend. abc saying he made a serious error in his bombshell report about michael flynn was not fully vetted through our editorial standards process. so what happened? well, as the shock of flynn's plea deal sank in on friday, as the nation tried to figure out what was happening, ross told viewers that flynn is prepared to point the finger directly at trump. and testified that the president, before taking office, ordered him to make contact with
the russians. that was before election day. the key here was that flynn was going to say it all happened during the campaign. raising the prospect of ill lets. that report called the dow jones to drop 350 points. although the market almost fully recovered later in the day. no other news outlets were able to match his bombshell reporting. we wondered why. and we found out. on the "nbc nightly news," ross backtracked. >> a clarification tonight on something one of flynn's confidantes told us. he said the president asked flynn to contact russia during the complain. he's clarifying that, saying candidate trump asked him during the campaign to find ways to repair relations with russia and afterward, the president-elect told him to contact him on issues to work together to fight isis. >> they call it a clarification, but it was a huge correction. team trump was outraged.
one of the president's sons, donald trump jr., retweeted me and predicted there would be no disciplinary action. we can put his tweet on-screen here. he said because it was looking bad for trump, nobody at abc would be punished. in fact, on saturday evening, abc did suspend ross, a four-week suspension, without pay. now the question is whether he will return in january. will he return to his job and what does that mean? what does all of this mean for the ongoing investigations into trump and russia? let's get into that now with our panel here in new york, political analyst, jeff greenfield and oliver darcy. and april ryan, washington bureau chief for american urban radio networks, also a cnn political analyst. oliver, you've been doing reporting all weekend. before we get into the details, jeff, when we look at what's going on so far, we don't know what flynn may say to mueller. isn't that the point, that this isn't exonerating for trump, not
incriminating. we don't know yet what's going on. >> that's what made this error so consequential. as you pointed out, if trump had directed his team to reach out to russia during the campaign, that is collusion. and that really undermines the notion this was a very conspiratorial operation. you would expect the president-elect to reach out, maybe. the thing that baffles me about this is why would it take abc news hours to correct this when every other media outlet was right? also, and i'm going to be very blunt about this. i'm sorry. this is not brian ross' first mistake in reporting breaking news inaccurately. linking saddam to the anthrax attacks in 2001. linking the aurora shooter to a tea party by using the wrong name. abc should have been on notice any time there is breaking news and special events, you run the risk of misreporting. having anchored at cnn, a report about nerve gas in laos that turned out to be unsupported, having to apologize.
mistakes are made. the second point i would make, because this is exactly what trump and his allies want to say, no matter what you hear on mainstream media, it's fake. they're doing it to hurt us. and this is like handing a sword to the people who want all media to be looked at in that regard. >> do you think that's why they've suspended him? in the past, would there have been a suspension for this? he wasn't suspended after the aurora mistake. >> i'm reluctant not only to predict the future, but to relitigate the past. all i know is in the current environment, i think they had to. >> so oliver, you were early on this story, you noticed on abc news.com on friday, that his reporting wasn't on the website. and that made you wonder what was going on. >> right. because if you have massive scoop that no other outlet has, you would be thinking they would be singing from mountaintops. instead, it was missing completely from their online reports. and so i started asking abc, you know, what's going on? why is ross' bombshell not online? and it took a few hours but eventually they got back to me
and said they would do this clarification on world news. and they eventually called it a correction and now say it's a serious error. but to your point, i've heard from people inside abc after four weeks they're still not certain, you know, can he come back, and is he -- when you report something, is it going to be seen as credible from now on? there is a lot of uncertainty about that. and inside abc too, when i was talking to people yesterday, they're very embarrass and had there is also frustration that he was allowed to go to air with this report. >> i think that we need to home in on. the idea that he had a single source and wasn't approved through the vetting process. if you or i had that kind of information, we would have to talk to our editors, our bosses, before reporting it on the air. the fact he didn't do that, suggests maybe this was not just his fault, there may have been a structural problem. >> right. it should have gone through some sort of vetting. it seems it didn't. and it's even particularly bad here, because his track record is not very good. he's had several high-profile mistakes, and he went to air with an explosive report that caused the market to tank, based
on a single anonymous source that ended up being, you know, not correct. >> to your point about the president -- to your point about the
stock market, the president weighed in this morning on twitter. let's put his tweet on screen. he says people who lost money when the stock market went down 350 points based on the false and dishonest reporting of brian ross, he's been suspended, should consider hiring a lawyer and suing abc for the damages his bad reporting has caused. many millions of dollars. april? you cover the president every day. your reaction? >> well, the president has said things about hiring lawyers before, when it comes to those who are accusing him of sexual misconduct. he hasn't done that yet. but this is a serious issue. and the stakes are very high. you know, we as reporters, we will make mistakes. we have. we continue to. and we will in the future. but the stakes are so high, brian. and right now, what's happening, i think, about how this administration pounces on one
moment that is -- that's a faux pas. i think about early on in the administration when sean spicer was press secretary, something that was small, but it blew up so big. you remember the controversy about the martin luther king jr. bust possibly not being in the office. people went berserk over it. and now this has gone to another level. stakes are so high. and we have to really make sure all the is are dotted and all of the ts are crossed. because this is a very serious situation. this russia investigation issue has tentacles that reach far beyond this moment. and into the future. the president has been set, as it relates to russia being involved in our election process. but how does this play out in the future? we have to get it right. there's no room for error. >> and many journalists are every day. i mean, i think back to thanksgiving, and when the "new york times" broke the news that flynn had stopped cooperating with trump's team, the lawyers
have stopped talking. that was a prelude to what we saw eight days later when he turned himself in court. so a lot of fantastic reporting happening. but these errors, they do undermine the profession. jeff, can i go back to the idea that the president of the united states is suggesting people sue a news outlet? this is not normal. >> you can see that five times a day, this is not normal. look, the president's understanding of the legal world is somewhat shaky. he also thinks he personally can rewrite the libel laws. but i just want to make one very quick point. it goes back -- as long as i've been in this business, which is back to thomas edison. when breaking news happens, when you are on the air, the editorial process is short-circuited. mistakes are going to multiply. i think back to the reagan shooting, when we reported he hadn't been shot, that he was shot, that james brady was dead. it is more important than ever in a story like a sudden breaking news that you be careful, and that you restrain
yourself from saying, i just heard an amazing fact. i can do that with some friends in a restaurant. if i do it on the air, i should be held accountable. >> and meanwhile, i'm watching fox news this morning, oliver, and the main take-away is trump's -- they're saying there's no real trouble for you in this mueller investigation. yeah, maybe the investigation should end, because you are so innocent. they're telling him, don't worry. you're winning the war on christmas. a lot of positivity and counter narrative. i wonder if the seriousness of the actual flynn news, not ross' mistake, but the actual news has been papered over by conservative media. >> it seems it has. fox did pretty good during the breaking news coverage. >> the actual journalists -- the newscast covered it well. >> when it goes to the prime time lineup, it's a total bubble. and a lot of fox is opinion. fox & friends, the president's favorite show in the morning. i want to go back to abc here. i think it's important when journalists make mistakes that outlets are -- you know,
transparent with their viewers and readers and they own it. and i'm wondering if abc would have actually owned this, had we not started asking questions. because initially they called it a clarification and then they wanted to call it -- went back and called it a correction. but would abc have owned this? there was not only a mistake made in the actual reporting, but how abc was transparent with their viewers in revealing that mistake to their audience. >> absolutely. meanwhile, the president's tweet about abc only one of ten tweets he's posted today. so oliver, thank you. after the break, we're going to talk about his relationship with twitter. and how it is now causing real danger. the market. but through good times and bad... ...at t. rowe price... ...we've helped our investors stay confident for over 75 years. call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. if yorheumatoid arthritisevere and you're talking to your rheumatologist about a medication,
this is humira. this is humira helping to relieve my pain and protect my joints from further irreversible damage. this is humira helping me reach for more. humira has been clinically studied for over 20 years. humira works for many adults. it targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to ra symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. talk to your doctor and visit humira.com. this is humira at work. so we know how to cover almost we've anything.st everything even a "red-hot mascot." [mascot] hey-oooo!
whoop, whoop! [crowd 1] hey, you're on fire! [mascot] you bet i am! [crowd 2] dude, you're on fire! [mascot] oh, yeah! [crowd 3] no, you're on fire! look behind you. [mascot] i'm cool. i'm cool. [burke] that's one way to fire up the crowd. but we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ i d...changed everything... you switched to the capital one quicksilver card. and how do you feel? [sighs] like a burden's been lifted. those other cards made you sign up for bonus cash back. then they change categories on you every few months. then you had to keep signing up! you...deserve...better. now get out there and keep earning that 1.5% cash back on every purchase everywhere. thanks, doc. i'm not a doctor. what? [whispers] time to go. what's in your wallet? ( ♪ )
more people shop online for the holidays than ever before. (clapping) and the united states postal service delivers more of those purchases to homes than anyone else in the country. ( ♪ ) because we know, even the smallest things are sometimes the biggest. even the smallest things your privacy makes you myt number 1 place to go number 2. i love you, but sometimes you stink. febreze air effects doesn't just mask, it cleans away odors. because the things you love the most can stink. and try febreze small spaces to clean away odors for up to 30 days. breathe happy with febreze. mopping robotthe from irobot. its precision jet spray and vibrating cleaning head
the vibration of your phone? the push alert about a new trump tweet? supporters love his unorthodox style on twitter. but it sometimes leads to shocking, unpresidential statements. of course, driving the news cycle and driving a lot of people a little bonkers. so it's time to reassess trump and twitter. some of his tweets are so dangerous, they might be endangering himself. he's posted ten times already today, including new attacks against james comey. but it's this one from saturday that's the big story of the weekend. he said, quote, i had to fire general flynn, because he lied to the vice president and the fbi. what? he knew about flynn lying to the fbi? back in january? now, comey says trump told him to ease off on flynn. so all of this raises the specter that trump just admitted to obstructing justice. but -- but -- but -- trump's lawyer, john dowd, jumped on the grenade. this is what dowd has been telling news outlets.
he says he drafted the tweet, which makes no sense. but it does raise the question about who is drafting the rest of the president's tweets? let's ask. who decided to retweet these racist anti muslim videos? at least one of the videos is just plain fake. one is from more than three years ago in egypt and one is yet to be verified. the retweets brought backlash from the uk prime minister, theresa may, so trump tweeted right back at his fellow head of state, only he didn't tweet back at her, because he tweeted at the wrong theresa may. then trump fixed the error and told the uk prime minister to mind her own business. and so on and so on. but the retweets also caused this. >> an unsettling headline this afternoon. officials at the u.s. state department were so concerned about the anti muslim videos that president trump retweeted yesterday, they told the white house they were actually worried that the president's actions might spark a reprise of violent
protests of u.s. embassies in the middle east. >> unsettling, to say the least. this is not the only example of troubling tweets recently. there was news out of libya, a tweet where the president called cnn international fake news, led some in the libyan media to question about people being sold at slave auctions in libya. real reporting now being challenged, using the president's fake tweets about fake news. let's dive more deeply into this problem, if it is a problem. back with me is jeff greenfield and brian caram, a regular in the briefing room. good to have you here today. >> good to see you, brian. >> let's talk through this twitter issue. do you think it's coming to a head, the president's tweets are becoming more troubling, a bigger problem for the country? >> when you issue tweets where you're -- one of your oldest allies is saying it's dangerous and when the state department is, sure. i want to offer a potential theory.
you know the movie "gas light?" >> yes. >> he tries to convince his wife she's going crazy by deliberately confusing her. i'm beginning to think that's what trump is doing. i'm beginning to think the shear range of these tweets in their distance from reality sometimes is all designed to make us run frantically from one tweet to the other in such a way we wind up losing all perspective. don't start covering the serious policy consequences of this regime. and wind up looking like completely fools, only because we are dealing with misinformation at such a level and with such indifference to the consequences that we lose perspective. i mean, i think everybody should go out and look at "gas light" again. >> i was looking to see if it's streaming on netflix. if i find out, i'll let you know as you watch. brian, i heard you jump in and say -- beginning? >> well, i call it twitter litter. it's always been that way since he's come into office. if you watch his -- when he tweets, it's always to obfuscate to get you to look somewhere
else so you're not looking at what's really going on. and that's been kind of the hallmark of his whole twitter campaign. and i know people in the high officials in the white house who would love to get him to drop the twitter and drop it and walk away. but they won't. it brings attention to him. it deflects from the issues that are at hand. and at the same time, gets us chasing our tails. which is what he loves. because he doesn't love us too much. he just loves the attention. >> i think the big important point about the racist videos he retweeted, the white house backed him up. >> that's scary. >> can we listen to sara sanders? let's take a look. >> yeah, that was -- >> i think what he's done is elevate the conversation to talk about a real issue and a real threat and that's extreme violence and extreme terrorism. something that we know to be very real. and something the president feels strongly about talking about, and bringing up and making sure it is an issue every single day. that we're looking at the best ways to protect americans. >> brian, your reaction? >> how do you tell me that
you've elevated the level of discussion in this country on a serious issue with a fake video on an issue that didn't occur? this -- if my children did this, i would punish them. this is such a bad lie, just to come forward with that statement is so disturbing on so many levels. and it's part and parcel of what we see every day. but that in particular is disheartening, because to tell me that you've elevated the level of discussion on an important issue by using a fake video, where is logic in this universe? please. >> all right. so for our viewers at home, you can rent "gas light" on amazon video, a movie jeff just mentioned. jeff, let's have what i always say is this uncomfortable conversation. i think it is deeply uncomfortable to talk about this. but i think we have to. look at the new york daily news this morning. a column calling the president a mad man. saying that he is truly unhinged. i've been noticing a new theme i the coverage of the president this week, among trump skeptics in the press.
liber liberal columnists. eugene robinson's column in the "washington post." people are saying we have to talk about his health now before it's too late. eugene robinson saying how long are we going to pretend that president trump is fully rational. how long are we going to ignore the signs he's danger allowsly out of control. and here is joe scarborough raising the same point. >> what are we supposed to say this? after the first nuclear missile goes? when is this the right time? to talk about a mentally unstable president in the white house, and a nuclear showdown with another unstable madman in north korea? >> that's the question. i'm going to ask you, jeff greenfield. is now the time? >> let me just make this point. what eugene robinson says, what michelle goldberg says, what the "new york daily news" says, what joe scarborough says in terms of people still with trump will have no impact at all. and the question is, is there going to come a time when people
who that base might listen to begin to raise this? and if they did that, would that base say oh, you've just gone over to the other side. i think trump's biggest success has been to tell his people that when you hear stuff from any of those people, including, by the way, highly conservative columnists, who have never been with trump, don't believe it, it's fake, believe me. and as long as donald trump can convince -- what looks like a shrinking number of people, but still a third of the country. and as long as the republican leaders in congress find him the right person with which to get their policies done, i don't think that's going to matter. it's -- i don't know what it will take to move that group away from their position that trump right, these guys wrong. >> brian, let me hear you react to that daily news piece i mentioned. this morning's new york daily news, editorial from the editorial board that says, quote, after his latest spassim of deranged tweets, only those completely under his spell can deny what growing numbers of americans have long suspected.
the president of the united states is profoundly unstable. he is mad. he is by any honest layman's definition, mentally unwell, and viciously lashing out. >> well -- >> it's been less than a year since he took office and this is what newspaper editorial boards are saying. >> well, to jeff's point, i think there's two things you have to look at. the appearance versus the reality. he would like his -- it goes further than what jeff was saying. he's not saying everything you hear is fake. he's saying, look, i'm doing this on purpose, relax. there's a method to my madness. at least that's what the sources that i have inside the white house tell me. it's an actual method. but at some point in time, method or madness, it's a legitimate question to ask. i don't know if i would take it to those extremes. but it is -- it is a question that has to be addressed with each additional tweet and as we march down this hall, where are we going? i mean, it's -- the tweet about anti muslim, that -- those three
tweets particularly are very troublesome. and if you don't examine what's going on, if you don't take the time to legitimately and logically look at it, we may well pay a heavy price. >> and he's going to say the media is just out to get him. jeff, thanks for being here. brian, stick around. up next, words i never thought i would be saying. matt lauer fired for sexual misconduct. the latest from our panel of media reporters, right after this. ♪
us lives here. where we can be surprised by others. and ourselves. for a better us, donate to your local y today. at t-mobile, when you holiday together, great things come in twos. like t-mobile and netflix. right now when you get an unlimited family plan, netflix is included. ho ho ho! t-mobile covers your netflix subscription... best christmas gift ever! ...so you can binge watch all year long. now you're thinking christmas!
and now when you buy any of this season's hot new samsung galaxy phones, you get a second one free to gift. that's one samsung for you. and one to give. t-mobile. holiday twogether. hi, i'm just looking at my account, and i've got all this extra cash back. yep. that's your cashback match. only discover will automatically match all the cash back new cardmembers earn at the end of their first year. you matched everything i earned this year? yeah. whoo! more money! more money! it's all very exciting. i'm going to spread the news! spread it wide! it's cashback match people! people! you know that. you all work here. new cardmembers get a dollar-for-dollar match at the end of their first year. only from discover. a heart attack doesn't or how healthy you look. no matter who you are, a heart attack can happen without warning. a bayer aspirin regimen can help prevent another heart attack. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. bayer aspirin.
we that's why at xfinityic. we've been working hard to simplify your experiences with us. now with instant text and email updates you'll always be up to date. you can easily add premium channels so you don't miss your favorite show. and with just a single word, find all the answers you're looking for. because getting what you need should be simple, fast, and easy. download the xfinity my account app or go online today. what started with harvey weinstein two months ago continued this week with matt lauer. although a very different case,
lauer's firing was the biggest tipping point moment yet. because the "today" show is beloved by millions of americans. and when they woke up to this news, they were stunned. lauer was the face of "today" for 20 years. but there were other names this week, too. many others dismissed from media companies due to harassment or other improper behavior. among them, a news editor at mpr. a senior producer at cnn's d.c. bureau and executive producer of several superhero tv shows on the cw. and three staffers at vice media. there were also two household names. radio broadcaster, garrison keillor and entrepreneur russell simmons. keillor fired from his minnesota public radio job, simmons saying he's handing his companies over to new leadership. but let's go back to lauer. men like lauer shaped the culture for decades. shaped news coverage, and shaped our perceptions of politics. this has come up about mark halperin, as well. lauer's handling of interviews
with candidates hillary clinton and donald trump are now being reexamined to see if his alleged behavior off camera tainted how he dealt with the women he was interviewing and covering. it's a complicated question. so we have some time now to talk about the ramifications of this. joining me now, cnn politics media and business reporter, and sara ellison, special correspondent at "vanity fair" and reporter from "hollywood reporter." what do we know about the internal review nbc is doing to find out about what happened and who might have known what? >> they're undertaking, they have said, to staff at nbc news a thorough review, and in a "nbc nightly news" meeting on friday, said people who knew about this and didn't say anything would be dealt with very severely. this didn't go over that well with some people inside nbc news, because you would assume that, you know, leadership should have known about this or at least should have asked
questions about this that they obviously didn't ask. >> how similar is this to fox news? i feel like we were asking some of the same questions about roger ailes and bill o'reilly at fox. >> the dynamics are quite similar. the problem is that everybody knew. nobody actually knew. but what are you not really looking for? if you're running these companies, if you're running these divisions and there are rumors, if you're not looking into those, you're sort of part of the problem. but the ground has shifted in the past two months. there's no question. >> yeah. i thought it was interesting. part of the review is looking into hr. and how to make it more -- how to make staffers more comfortable contacting hr and reporting misconduct by colleagues. that is the same issue we heard at fox, we heard at weinstein company, over and over and over again. that staffers don't feel comfortable coming forward with complaints. >> well, because staffers don't feel comfortable partly because of the power these people hold. you had nbc anchors themselves saying live on air after this broke, that matt lauer was arguably the most powerful person at nbc news, even more
powerful than some of the executives. so how do you expect a younger woman, let's say, in a junior position, to come up against somebody like that, especially in a he said/she said situation? now, though, as we have said, the ground does seem to have shifted where maybe now we're going to see executives starting to investigate these rumors, as sara talked about, whereas before they might chalk them up to typical newsroom chatter. maybe knnow we'll see investigations. >> hr is seen as protecting the company. not protecting the women who come forward. and so far what we have seen is it has taken journalists, not hr departments, to really unearth these stories. >> i remember seeing "variety's" maureen ryan, who investigated claims against a producer in hollywood. she said journalists are acting like the hr departments, essentially, by uncovering these stories. and on the point about nbc and the review, i'm told it will take several weeks, maybe not months, but weeks. so we may not have an outcome until after christmas. i wonder about other cases that we all may still know are in the works. vice media, for example.
the "new york times" has been looking into vice for several weeks. we saw three firings this week, which seemed to be an attempt to get ahead of whatever the "times" is about to report. is it fair to say, sarah, there are other investigations in other newsrooms still in the work? >> you to think there are. i know some are ongoing, but i think everyone at this point -- these companies might not be motivated by anything other than self preservation. but at this point, that is required, in fact. like, look into this stuff. >> right. >> i think they're in a panic. >> who is in a panic? >> media companies are in a panic about what is going to come out about their people, and they are trying to in some cases get ahead of it. and, you know, as we sit here today, there are rumors about top executives at multiple media companies, okay? these are the people making the decisions to fire some of these people. >> but it's important to differentiate between rumors and something that can be corroborated. >> also what you hear in almost all of these cases, we knew
there might have been infidelity. but that's a private matter. and, of course, that is a private matter. but workplaces have rules about dating underlings and bosses for a reason. because this stuff gets really murky. >> the broader picture perspective that i've seen several columnists write about this week is the idea that lauer and mark halperin and harvey weinstein and mike at mpr, they were shaping news coverage. they were shaping cultural opinion. how much do you buy into that idea, sarah, that these could have been misogynists who were in some cases criticizing hillary clinton before election day? are there dynamics there? >> i think it's impossible to see hillary's coverage and not see that. i mean, that's the best example we have. you can't just -- it's not just being a sensitive flower. you can go back and look through that. hillary was a difficult candidate. she didn't answer questions clearly sometimes. she tried to tell the truth and sounded like she was lying. but there's no question that
when you look at a variety of different interviews with her, and that's -- that's the evidence that we do have, you can't really argue with that notion. >> well, what about you had -- do you buy into this suggestion that, you know, these are shapers of the culture? that weinstein was this predator behind the scenes, and that affected what movies he would make. what movies he wouldn't make, for example? >> i don't think that we can at all avoid what these people did behind the scenes, and how that might have translated into their work and obviously as we said, halperin, charlie rose, weinstein, matt lauer. they shaped a lot of our political coverage. but i do think we can argue that people are very complicated people. and for some of these men, i'm hearing conflicting things from women who work with them who said, i'm having a hard time grappling with this, because on the one hand, this person was such a champion for me and a champion for my work and did such good work. but on the other, may have done some of these horrible things. i do think that we can go back and examine their interviews for
what they were. matt lauer's interview with hillary clinton at the intrepid was criticized widely for how he handled it. before we even knew about any of these allegations. >> that idea that people are trying to come to grips with, you know, the person they saw on television and the person that might have been -- he's alleged to have sexually assaulted someone in his office off-camera. i wonder if it's too soon to have those conversations. what do you think? personally, i as a viewer keep thinking about how many millions of viewers loved spending their mornings with matt lauer. and now feel somehow that was tainted. >> i mean, that's what you're hearing a lot of. our colleagues went out and spoke to "today" show fans, just the day after this all happened. and you heard a lot of sadness in their voices and you hear a lot of sadness in the voices of colleagues of these people who are accused of these -- of these things and lose their jobs as a result. and it's true. because you can feel sad for both the person who is the accused. you can feel really sad for the victims, as well. and what "today" show has to
deal with is that matt lauer is somebody who was sitting in people's living rooms every morning. that people felt they really knew these anchors. and to hear this whole other side of them, it's a really shocking thing. the "today" show has to figure out, how do they build that trust back up with their viewers? >> and one more question for our panel here about, of course, succession planning. the question of who will replace matt lauer on "today." and charlie rose on cbs. we have never seen this before, right? two empty chairs on morning tv. >> amazing. and, you know, for years the discussion has always been, who is going to be matt lauer's co host? is it matt lauer going to sign a new contract? and now he's gone. charlie rose gone. >> what younger woman will be sitting next to matt lauer while he continues to age. >> i think, you know, in talking to a lot of women anchors in the last few days, what they -- they hope is that this will explode that myth. that you need the older sort of perfunctory, you know, kind of man with the younger woman who is in the side kick role. and they're hoping that, you
know, at least maybe we can kind of get away from that retro thinking. >> from that idea. >> and it certainly punctures that happy family of morning television. i mean, it really, really blows that all apart. and that's a real problem for the networks, because that was such a cash cow for them. >> the "today" show was called america's first family in the 1990s. katie, matt, al and ann. and the only person left is al roker. who would have thought that al roker would be the last person in that family. to the panel, thank you all for being here. and a quick plug. we sent out a special edition of our newsletter, when the news break. our six-night a week recap of all of the day's media news. next here on the program, one of my next guests says it's a badge of honor that he was not invited to this white house christmas party. so find out who was there, and what happened, right after this. paying less for my medicare? i'm open to that. lower premiums? extra benefits? it's open enrollment. time to open the laptop... ...and compare medicare health plans. why? because plans change, so can your health needs.
so, be open-minded. look at everything-like prescription drug plans... and medicare advantage plans from private insurers. use the tools at medicare.gov. or call 1-800-medicare. open to something better? start today. ♪ (avo) but you also have a higher risk of heart attack or stroke. non-insulin victoza® lowers a1c, and now reduces cardiovascular risk. victoza® lowers my a1c and blood sugar better than the leading branded pill. (avo) and for people with type 2 diabetes treating cardiovascular disease, victoza® is now approved to lower the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. and while it isn't for weight loss, victoza® may help you lose some weight. (avo) victoza® is not for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer,
multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza® or any of its ingredients. stop taking victoza® and get medical help right away if you get symptoms of a serious allergic reaction such as rash, swelling, difficulty breathing or swallowing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. so, stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area. tell your doctor your medical history. gallbladder problems have happened in some people. tell your doctor right away if you get symptoms. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, indigestion, and constipation. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. ask your doctor about victoza®.
skip the white house christmas party. here was the statement from the network about why. quote, in light of the president's continued attacks on freedom of the press and cnn, we do not feel it's appropriate to celebrate with him as his invited guests. we will send a white house reporting team to the event and report on it if news warrants. now, every other major television network did go ahead and allow staff -- you know, have staff go ahead and attend this party. you can see from the photos here shared on twitter. there were also journalists from print publications at the "new york times" who decided to attend. trump did not answer any questions about the flynn plea deal. he didn't pose for photos. but he did give a brief speech, praising the stamina of the press. now, i think it's interesting that this decision was so controversial. that outlets had to decide whether to go to the party or not. so let's talk with two reporters who did not attend. and find out what happened here. april ryan, brian camrah back
with me. you were not invited? is that right? what happened? >> what happened? i was not invited. i did not receive -- brian, behave. i did not receive an invitation. now, brian, you have to understand, people think that these invitations just come out, you know, just before the party. the invitations were given out weeks in advance. way before thanksgiving in november. >> right. >> i knew i wasn't invited. and i was fine with it. >> so you are saying you were snubbed on purpose? >> i believe i was -- i'm not going to say snubbed. i believe they did not want me at the party. they did not want to put me on the list. >> exactly. >> why? >> people were asking me, and they said, are you going? i said, i never got on invitation. and i did go into my e-mail, just to see if i got one. and i never -- never got that e-mail. and then i went -- kept going on about my day. i didn't go to the white house press office, like some did. oh, i didn't get my invitation. i didn't care. and i'm going to tell you why, brian. and i'm going to say this to
you. you know, people think that i'm hurt that i did not get invited. i am so fine. friday, i'm glad my fellow reporters did attend. but i'm going to say this. in august, when i was named the journalist of the year by the nabj, which i was thankful for, that saturday night. sunday morning, there was a campaign ad that came out that had the endorsement of the president saying he approved this message. it was a bunch of our friends, talk show hosts, who were said to be thwarting the president's agenda. and there was one white house correspondent in that -- one -- only one white house correspondent in that picture. me. >> i remember that. >> yeah, i remember. >> i was considered the enemy. so, yes. so -- and i was very upset about that. because that put a target on my head. so understand this. if someone considers me the enemy, i understand that i'm not going to break bread with you, and i'm sure you don't want to break bread with me. >> so you would not have gone. >> i would not have gone anyway. i would not have gone anyway.
i am good. and i understand how they feel about me, and i understand how they feel about the press. but i have not done anything wrong. i am covered by the first amendment. so i would not have gone anyway. but trust me, i have been to christmas parties before for other presidents, the last three. i've covered over 20ersia. >> i think you're good, april. >> it's a good way for us -- it's a good way for us to have a -- to have a better business relationship, to get more information. i've been to christmas parties, state dinners and other events from george w. bush, bill clinton and barack obama. and if this president chooses not to, that's fine with me. i am okay. >> i've got about a minute left. and i think brian, this gets to the brooader point -- >> took all of the time, april. >> this point about how it's different to cover this president, and journalists have to make these tough decisions. >> well, even -- >> even about going to parties. >> it's not a tough decision to make. you call me the enemy of the people. i consider it a badge of honor you didn't invite me.
as far as i'm concerned, i made richard nixon's enemies list and i'm thankful for it. i begrudge no one who went. i like april am fine with not being invited. the simple fact of the matter is, i'm there to do a job. if you don't appreciate the job and you're going to call me the enemy of the people and tell me for a year that i am part of the problem, why should i sit down and break bread with you? you've declared war on me. so the bottom line is -- and i appreciate the people who went. i think it's fine that you went. i would not go. i've been to others. and i would not go to this one. had i been invited, i think there needs to be some change inside the white house, some recognition of what we do, some respect for what we do. there is little respect for what we do. we are constantly vilified. in those tweets that he sent out today, how many times did he say fake media? today, just today. he's always blaming us for his foibles. he said -- i don't want him to thank me. i don't want him to thank me. i want him to quit telling me i'm fake.
he's got to own up to the fact that the problem is his, and not ours. we are always going to make mistakes. we always will. >> are two very real journalists, april and brian. thank you for being here. he mentioned nixon. we'll have more on that right after a quick break. its precision jet spray and vibrating cleaning head loosen and scrub stains. all while navigating kitchens, bathrooms and those hard to reach places. you and braava jet from irobot. better together.
you can switch and save time. it pays to switch things up. [cars honking] [car accelerating] you can switch and save worry. ♪ you can switch and save hassle. [vacuuming sound] and when you switch to esurance, you can save time, worry, hassle and yup, money. in fact, drivers who switched from geico to esurance saved hundreds. so you might want to think about pulling the ol' switcheroo. that's auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance. an allstate company. click or call. you only earn double withmiles when you buy stuffds, from that airline. is this where you typically shop? is this where anyone typically shops? it's time to switch to the capital one venture card. with venture, you earn unlimited double miles on every purchase, everywhere, every day... not just airline purchases. seriously... double miles... everywhere! what's in your wallet? the markets change...
most people in the community recognize the blue trucks as pg&e. my truck is something new... it's an 811 truck. when you call 811, i come out to your house and i mark out our gas lines and our electric lines to make sure that you don't hit them when you're digging. 811 is a free service. i'm passionate about it because every time i go on the street i think about my own kids. they're the reason that i want to protect our community and our environment, and if me driving a that truck means that somebody gets to go home safer, then i'll drive it every day of the week. together, we're building a better california.
which egg has better taste only eggland's best. and is the only egg i'll serve my family? eggland's best. better taste, better nutrition, better eggs. legendary editor ben bradlee who wan "the washington post" during watergate is the subject of a new film "the newspaper man" premiering monday night on hbo. i sat down with bradley's widow sally quinn and asked if she sees any parallels between president trump and the coverage of nixon back then? >> oh, i would say lying, lying and lying. i mean, one of the things that ben hated the most, my husband, ben bradlee, was lying. people ask me every day how would ben react in this environment. what i think is he would be
conflicted because on the one hand he is a journalist and he would recognize this as a great story and he would say let's get the story, let's go out and get it, get it right, get it first, but get it right. if it's nixon and watergate or if it's trump and the russians or trump and the taxes or the business deals or whatever it might be, look at the -- go for the money. who are the people involved? what was happening? it's not -- there would never be this get the president. that was never his goal. >> one of the lessons you hope viewers take away from this film? >> i would hope that people would be optimistic. because i am optimistic. i think ben would be optimistic. i think there's this sense that we've all got to work together to get to the truth and get the story, and we will and it will and our country will survive and so will the first amendment.
>> and on an optimistic note we'll see you right back here next week. iis made of. but right now, our bond is fraying. how do we get back to "us"? the y fills the gaps. and bridges our divides. donate to your local y today. because where there's a y, there's an us. at t-mobile, when you holiday together, great things come in twos. like t-mobile and netflix. right now when you get an unlimited family plan, netflix is included. ho ho ho! t-mobile covers your netflix subscription...
best christmas gift ever! ...so you can binge watch all year long. now you're thinking christmas! and now when you buy any of this season's hot new samsung galaxy phones, you get a second one free to gift. that's one samsung for you. and one to give. t-mobile. holiday twogether. with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis? how do you chase what you love do what i did. ask your doctor about humira. it's proven to help relieve pain and protect joints
from further irreversible damage in many adults. humira works by targeting and helping to block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to ra symptoms. humira has been clinically studied for over 20 years. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. ready for a new chapter? talk to your rheumatologist about humira. this is humira at work. i ...prilosec otc 7 years ago,my doctor recommended... 5 years ago, last week. just 1 pill each morning, 24 hours and zero heartburn. it's been the number 1 doctor recommended brand for 10...
investigation bombshell. president trump insists he's not worried about michael flynn pleading guilty to lying to the fbi and now cooperating with the probe. >> there's been absolutely no collusion. >> but now new questions about what the president knew and when. we'll talk exclusively with the top democrat on the senate intelligence committee, senator mark warner, next. plus, late-night victory. >> the tax cuts and jobs act is passed. >> while youe