tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN November 15, 2018 3:00pm-4:00pm PST
news. possible traps. after days of reviewing questions from robert mueller, the president's lawyers reportedly see potential land mines for mr. trump. what did they learn about the direction of the russia investigation? throwing stones. as mueller may be closing in, trump ally roger stone releases texts he exchanged with his alleged back channel to wikileaks. do the messages offer any evidence of collusion? within the margin, after a machine recount, the florida senate race is too close to call, so now the ballots will be counted again, by hand. we're following all the breaking news on the election cliff-hangers in the sunshine state. and searching for the loss. as the death toll soars in california's wildfire disaster, we're learning new details about the painful and painstaking efforts to find and identify victims. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room
with wolf blitzer." >> this is cnn breaking news. >> breaking news tonight. we're getting a new read from the president's lawyer on robert mueller's questions about collusion and mr. trump's efforts to answer them. "the washington post" reported that rudy giuliani is warning of, quote, possible traps for the president after mr. trump huddled with his attorneys for days, his responses to mueller could be turned over to the special counsel as soon as tomorrow. this hour i'll speak with the house intelligence committee member joaquin castro. and our correspondents and analysts are also standing by. first, let's go to our senior white house correspondent pamela brown. pamela, tell us more about "the washington post" report and your own new reporting on the president's review of mueller's written questions to the president. >> well, wolf, tonight the president's attorney, rudy giuliani, revealing in a "washington post" interview that
some of the questions robert mueller's team gave to the president to answer could create legal issues for them. he also said he believes some of the questions are traps. this comes after the president has been reviewing these questions with his lawyers the past three days before launching a twitter tirade against mueller and his team this morning. president trump staying on message in front of the cameras today, working to quell criticism after skipping veterans day events in paris and at home over the long holiday weekend. >> it's my honor to be with you, and god bless america. keep up the great work. >> reporter: but lashing out offcamera, trump spent his morning tweeting calling the russia investigation, quote, a disgrace to our nation, and once again claiming it's a total witch-hunt like no other in american history, saying these are angry people, including the highly conflicted bob mueller, who worked for obama for eight years. >> it's my honor to nominate robert s. mueller of california to become the director of the federal bureau of investigation.
>> trump failing to mention mueller was first appointed by president george w. bush as fbi director and then continued serving under president obama. he is also a registered republican. this follows three days of going over the special counsel's questions with his legal team. and according to "the washington pos post", there are at least two dozen questions trump's lawyer rudy giuliani telling the post, quote, there are some that create more issues for us legally than others. some were unnecessary. some were possible traps, and we might consider some as irrelevant. the president's attacks on the mueller investigation today come during a week of white house dysfunction. after losing power in the house of representatives, the first lady forced the president's hand in reassigning the deputy national security adviser with more potential firings on the horizon. still, the president defended his administration, tweeting today the white house is running very smoothly, and instead called the mueller investigation a total mess, tweeting they have
found no collusion and have gone absolutely nuts. they are screaming and shouting at i'm, horribly threatening them to come up with the answer they want. but sources say it is the president that is growing more furious by the day. a white house official telling cnn, quote, yes, he is pissed, at damn near everyone. already nine cabinet officials have left the trump administration. tensions continue to rise with his chief of staff, john kelly, and the fate of homeland security secretary kirstjen nielsen is still uncertain. special counsel robert mueller is one person some lawmakers are trying to protect from being fired. >> the president now has this investigation in his sights, and we all know it. >> reporter: but despite efforts by retiring republican senator jeff flake to force a senate vote on a bill to protect the investigation, other republicans say that's not necessary. despite the president's attacks. >> you did do that, all you would do is get into a big hassle. which the president?
>> with him and with a lot of others. >> reporter: and the president's attorney rudy giuliani also saying to "the washington post" tonight that robert mueller has not imposed a firm deadline in terms of when the answers should be submitted, but giuliani is saying they could be submitted as soon as tomorrow. that is significant, wolf, because sources close to the president say they believe the president's answers to these questions could be one of the few remaining pieces of the puzzle before mueller issues his final report. wolf? >> all right, pamela, thank you very much. pamela brown at the white house. let's bring in cnn's cara skinell, part of the team covering the russia investigation. cara, giuliani's personal lawyers said some of the questions submitted by mueller create more issues for us legally than others. how do you read into that? it's suggesting maybe the president may be in some legal jeopardy? >> i think that's a fair way to interpret this, because we don't often -- we hear from giuliani, but he is sort of acknowledging in this that they have some
issues that are problematic for them legally. and so what this is telling us is that -- he is also according to "the washington post" mentioned there were two dozen questions among these that had to do with issues before the election. and that could be this area where they're potentially more problematic. >> he also says in this giuliani/"washington post" interview, some of the questions were possible traps, his words, possible traps. do you think that what has potentially motived the president to go on this rampage today, attacking mueller and his entire team? >> we've seen this pattern before where the starts quotie i -- tweeting. it's quite possible these questions triggered that. and giuliani has been out there saying that they're trying to catch the president in a perjury trap. so perhaps some of these questions are issues where exactly how the president answers this could very well turn on his fate or others that it impacts. >> giuliani says the answers that may be submitted to mueller
as early as tomorrow. we'll watch that closely. amidst all of this, there is new indications from long-time trump ally roger stone. he appears to be clearly in robert mueller's crosshairs. you have some text messages that he released, roger stone, discussing wikileaks, the plans to release the hacked e-mails from the dnc and from john podesta. tell us about what these e-mails show. >> these were released by roger stone. he is clearly trying to support and bolster his claim that, you know, his back channel to any information about wikileaks was coming from this new york radio personality randy credico. so we have some e-mails starting back from august of 2016. and in one of those e-mails, this is a text message sent from randy credico to stone, just days after credico had interviewed julian assange, the head of wikileaks in which credico tells stone wikileaks has kryptonite on hillary and please don't out me as your source.
another text message from september 18th in which credico says to stone, just remember, do not name me as your connection to assange. and then on october 1, which is six days before wikileaks does the dump of john podesta's e-mails where credico is saying big news wednesday. now pretend you don't know me. stone replies you died five years ago. and credico responds in the text, great. hillary's campaign will die this week. this is roger stone trying to get ahead of this and saying look, my source in this, my back channel, and here is the sources to prove it is randy credico. he is claiming he had no knowledge of any of the hacked e-mails in advance, and he was making these twitter previews that he said during the campaign as something that he was picking up from credico and that he learned publicly. and we have heard from roger stone again this week on the point where he basically is saying he did not do anything wrong in this. >> let's not forget the u.s. intelligence community concluded
that russian intelligence, russian military intelligence did all the hacking of the dnc and john podesta and hillary clinton's e-mails and all of that. they then gave to it wikileaks to submit to make public al those damaging e-mails. all right. kara scannell reporting for us, thank you very much. we're also following breaking news on the florida election recount. round one now over. close u.s. senate races head for a second recount, this time by hand. let's go to cnn's ryan nobles. he is in tallahassee, the florida capital for us. what are you learning about this next phase of the recount? >> well, the secretary of state's office right behind me, wolf, officially put out the word there would be a manual recount of the overvotes and undervotes in u.s. senate race between bill nelson and rick scott. but what we are just learning in the last few minutes is there were at least three counties who did not finish the machinery count, the first stage of recount on time, including two big democratic strongholds, palm
beach county, which we knew was having problems from the very beginning, and broward county, which actually submitted their results two minutes late. as a result, the secretary of state revertd back to to if numbers from other three counties posted on saturday. regardless, it doesn't really mean all that much in the grand scheme of things because the margins in this senate race did not change all that much. in fact, rick scott did gain votes over this process, but it remains less than a quarter of a percent difference. and according to florida law, that automatically triggers the recount of the overvotes and undervotes in this contest. >> ryan, what will the officials be looking for during the hand recount? >> great question. everyone probably wonders what an overvote or undervote. it's essentially when someone is filling in the little dots to indicate which person they want to vote for. if they put a marking in both of the ovals and the optical scan
machine picks that up, they register that as an overvote. they kick that ballot out and put it off to the side. for they choose not to vote for either candidate. so there is nothing registered in either particular oval, they pull that out, and that's considered an undervote. now this is very important for one specific reason, wolf. in broward county in particular, there appears to be at least 25,000 more votes that were cast in the race for governor than there were in the race for senate. so is that a problem with the machine? did they not pick up the senate race for some reason? that is something that will be discovered in this meticulous hand recount that will take place. wolf, they have a short timeline, though. they have to have that done by the 18th of november. >> all right. i want to show our viewers once again that overvote. courtesy of spectrum bay news 9. they showed us that overvote looks. we're going to watch that closely as this hand recount is about to begin. ryan nobles, once again, thank you very much. we're going to have much more on the florida recount.
that's coming up. but right now, i want to turn back to the breaking news on the russia investigation and the trump team's assessment of robert mueller's questions for the president. joining us now congressman joaquin castro. he is a democrat. he serves on the intelligence and foreign affairs committees. congressman, thank you so much for joining us. as you know by now, the president's personal lawyer rudy giuliani has told "the washington post" just a little while ago that some of robert mueller's questions create more legal issues forrer the president than others. is that an acknowledgment that the president may be personally implicated in the mueller investigation? >> it certainly could be. it's hard to know that right now. but i guess to be honest, it's hard for me to understand that response by rudy giuliani because as far as i know, this is the first time that president trump will be swearing answers to these questions. so it's not like -- so in other words, he should be able to just tell the truth and not worry about having contradicted himself under oath before. so as long as he tells the truth, i don't see how there is
a problem, and i don't see how any particular question is a trap. >> but in the interview that giuliani gave "the washington post," and i'm reading it right now, he says some of the questions were, quote, possible traps and overs we might consider as irrelevant. those are the words that giuliani used. >> the special counsel gets to determine the relevancy of the questions. also, the president and his legal team may not fully understand why those question are being asked, but i doubt they're being asked for a frivolous purpose. there is a reason behind that. and again, on the trap issue, as long as the president is willing to tell the truth, he shouldn't have any problem. >> do you think the process of preparing these answers led the president to unleash this furious attack on the entire russia investigation this morning? >> yeah, i think it's probably a combination of things. i think it's probably the bad election results, and almost certainly has to do with the
fact that he is being made to sit down and give answers to these questions. but remember, wolf, this by itself is a kind of courtesy and an olive branch extended by the special counsel because he hasn't brought the president in as they brought a lot of other witnesses in to give testimony on this stuff. >> he also in this interview with the daily caller, he called the entire investigation, he said it was an illegal investigation, even though it's a justice department investigation. he says it was illegal. let's move on and get your thoughts on these text messages showing long-time trump ally roger stone anticipating the wikileaks increase, wikileaks release of hacked democratic e-mails. do you view those texts as evidence of collusion? >> well, what's interesting about roger stone and his testimony, he basically lied to congress. we asked him the question. multiple people in the room asked him the question about whether he had advanced
knowledge of these e-mail dumps that were coming. and at one point he said no. and i asked him later in the interview, and he said yes, he admitted that he did. so i think that's a pretty clear case of perjury on the part of roger stone. so i think that he's probably at some point, i would expect that he'll face a perjury charge. >> in one of his tweets today, the president also claimed that robert mueller is, quote, protecting hillary clinton, the acting attorney general matt whitaker has previously argued that clinton should be investigated. what concerns does that raise in your mind? >> well, over the last week, there has been great reporting that gives a lot of people deep concerns about matthew whitaker, his background, his career and his fitness to be serving as acting attorney general. number one, he should immediately recuse himself from overseeing the mueller investigation. that's the first thing. but even the ability to serve for 210 days as acting attorney general when he basically made statements that jews and muslims
and other non-christians were not fit to serve as judges in the united states of america which was recently reported, that by itself should be disqualifying. >> there is other news we're following right now. i want to pick your brain while i have you. there is a new report in "the new york times" that reveals that facebook saw evidence of russian hacking in the presidential election as early as the spring of 2016 and the company continuously downplayed russia's use of facebook for its cyber warfare campaign. is that something your committee and the house intelligence committee would pursue in your party assumes control, the majority after january 3rd? >> that news was stunning and very troubling, and that will definitely be something that we're going to investigate further in the new term, in the new congress. >> i suspect there is a lot you're going to be investigating once you're in the majority in the house of representatives, specifically the intelligence committee. are you 100%, congressman, behind nancy pelosi for speaker
of the house, or would you potentially consider a challenger? >> i'm supporting nancy pelosi. i said yesterday in a statement that she's tough. she's smart. she is best prepared to work at creating opportunity for all americans, but also best prepared to hold the white house accountable. and i believe that in the end that she'll prevail and be speaker of the house in january. >> we'll know soon enough. congressman joaquin castro of texas, thank you very much. >> thank you. just ahead, we'll have more on the breaking news the president's legal team raising red flags about the questions robert mueller wants answered by mr. trump. is the president in legal jeopardy tonight? woo! wait, what?! everyone's excited about the chevy vehicles at the chevy black friday sales event. i can get used to this. wooow and you will be too when you get 0% financing on our award-winning chevy cars, trucks, and suvs. how is that even possible? now, get 0% financing for 72 months on popular 2018 and 2019 chevy models. or, make no monthly payments until next year.
the black friday sales event ends soon. find new roads at your local chevy dealer. the black friday sales event ends soon. nothing's more important than a good bedside manner. i don't know how to say this. it's okay, doc. give it to me straight. no, you don't understand, i don't know how to say this. i'm just a tv doctor. they also know you should get your annual check-up. it could save your life. schedule a check-up with your doctor, know your four health numbers, and start taking control of your health today. cigna. together, all the way.
the doctor just for a shot. with neulasta onpro patients get their day back... to be with family, or just to sleep in. strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache.
you wouldn't feel good not knowing the price here. outback steakhouse. don't let it happen when you buy your diabetes test strips. with the accu-chek® guide simplepay program, you pay the same low price. all without having to go through insurance. plus, they come in a spill-resistant vial along with a free meter. skip the guessing game and focus on your health. not the cost. make saving simple today at simplepaysaves.com. a moment of joy. a source of inspiration. an act of kindness. an old friend. a new beginning. some welcome relief... or a cause for celebration. ♪ what's inside? ♪ [laughter] possibilities. what we deliver by delivering.
we're back with the breaking news. trump lawyer rudy giuliani says some of robert mueller's questions for the president may be traps. "the washington post" quoting giuliani after mr. trump spent three days huddling with his defense team, spending hours and hours and hours going over the special counsel's written questions about possible collusion with russia. let's bring back our analysts. and gloria, let's start with you. some of the questions giuliani says were unnecessary, some were irrelevant, some are possible traps. there are some that creates more issues for us legally than others. that sounds like they're worried that the president could be in some legal jeopardy. >> you know, i'm sorry mr. giuliani doesn't like the questions from the special counsel, that they're not to his liking. it's amazing to me because honestly, they've been working on these questions for weeks. they finally negotiated a way
where the president didn't have to testify face-to-face on the issues of collusion, that he actually got a take-home open book test which they are writing answers to. and the fact that rudy giuliani is now complaining about the questions leads me to believe, first of all, they don't know what everybody else is testifying and they're a little worried about that, and maybe they're worried about their own client and whether their client is actually telling the truth. saying that this could be a perjury trap when you know the question, you have the lawyers with all the testimony in front of them that they know about, they can write these answer, and he still is worried about a perjury trap is sort of head-scratching to me, and i presume the other lawyers involved in this are not thrilled about rudy giuliani saying this publicly. >> and you've seen rudy giuliani and the president's legal team delay and delay and delay answering these questions.
first, the special counsel wanted it in person and they delayed that. now they have granted their request to do them as written questions, and this seems to be another delay tactic by rudy giuliani. if he really thinks the questions are a trap, i'm not sure how that could be because likely they already know the answers to the questions. they just want to have the question's questions and answers written down under oath, something that he is swearing this is the true. i think that would be more likely the case. it does seem as rudy giuliani is trying to move the goalpost here. >> let me get jeffrey toobin to weigh in. how do you interpret those questions from rudy giuliani? >> i like to think of myself as a reasonably intelligent person, and i don't even know what the perjury trap. i hear people talking about it all the time, and i've never understood what it means. just tell the truth. >> exactly. >> it's just mysterious to me. look, this is the longest running soap opera i have ever seen. this drew "the interview" was originally schedule at camp
david in the middle of january, and it's snowing in new york and washington in the next winter now when this thing is finally being answered and they're still not in. they've never wanted to answer these questions. they've done everything they can to delay and put them off. i don't think the fact that they have objections to the questions means specifically that they're worried about criminal liability. they have privileges to assert. they have relevancy to assert. but this is the easiest version, as gloria said, i wish i had thought of that, that this is like a take-home examine. the lawyers are going to scrutinize these answers so that they are legally bulletproof. this should not be a problem. >> jeffrey, you spent a lot of time with rudy giuliani. you've done a lot of articles in "the new yorker" magazine about rudy giuliani. so when he says some of these questions are unnecessary, we might consider some as irrelevant, some were possible
traps. if you've done nothing wrong and you've got nothing to hide, why not simply answer the questions? >> i think to be fair to rudy you don't have to answer an irrelevant question if it's genuinely irrelevant. and there are certain areas that a president doesn't have to answer questions about. but they have fought this issue for so long, in so many ways. you know, one approach to this might have been, of course we answered the questions. they were all easy, because all we had to do was tell the truth. >> that's a good point. >> and instead, this endless trashing of mueller, endless trashing of the process. when it's the easiest possible route to resolving this issue. >> it clearly mueller doesn't consider those questions irrelevant. why should rudy giuliani even have the pleasure of saying they might be irrelevant? >> to my mind, when i hear mayor giuliani saying these things, become to what gloria was saying, if in fact they have a
take home test that they have time to prepare for, lawyers answering the questions on behalf of the president, talking them over, it suggests to me they're trying to loosen up the top soil so later on if it comes out there is inconsistencies between what the president said and other witnesses have said, or they're simply able to have a satisfactory answer toify any of those questions, they can say well, we said these were irrelevant. we said these were perjury traps. we said this was problematic. >> they clearly combed the public record of what donald trump has said and what he hasn't said about lots of things that were asked about, i'm sure that are being asked about in these questions. say whether the president knew about the don jr. meeting at trump tower, et cetera, et cetera. i'm sure that they have to kind of square the circle. it's not an easy job for them, but what they consider irrelevant or traps is sort of irrelevant, to be honest. it's what the special counsel wants to ask them.
and he that's one who gets to ask the questions. they get to answer them. >> it does feel like we are back where we were this summer. like we took a time machine, and it broke down where we were this summer, where the president and rudy giuliani and his legal team were complaining about the questions that robert mueller wanted to ask back when we got -- there were dozens of questions. we saw those 45 questions that they wanted to ask. the president is going after robert mueller on twitter. but then it's the president and his legal team and members of this administration who are complaining on a regular basis that this investigation is going on for too long, it's taking up too much time. it's been way too delayed. a big part of why it's been delayed is that the president and his legal team have gone back and forth and back and forth with the special counsel's team over this interview. >> go ahead, jeffrey. >> and it's worth remembering, this is only a fight about matters that took place before he was president. they have outright refused to answer questions on all of the obstruction of justice issues,
as i understand it relating to the firing of james comey and the like. so that whole issue is unresolved, whether the president will answer any questions at all, whether he'll answer questions in writing, whether mueller will actually subpoena the president to get answers. this tortuous process only relates to half the investigation. so this whole issue is far from resolved. >> it's interesting. kaitlan, you cover the white house for us. it's clearly affecting the president, these three days of intense answers that he is trying to prepare for the special counsel. he tweeted this morning, and i'll put it up on the screen. the inner works of the mueller investigation are a total mess. they have found no collusion and have gone absolutely nuts. they are screaming and shouting at people, horribly threatening them to come up with the answers they want. they are a disgrace to our nation. now this is a justice department investigation. the president is saying it's a disgrace to the nation.
sort of reminds me of what the president told lesley stahl early on right after he ruwas inaugurated when he continued to go after the fake news media, and he suggested well, in case there are some articles that are negative, i don't want my supporters to believe those articles. now it looks like mueller's got stuff and the special counsel is smearing the justice department investigation because he is afraid something will come up and he wants his supporters to not believe what mueller comes up with. >> and he not even using facts to do so because he is claiming that robert mueller is highly conflicted, saying one time there were photos of he and the former fbi director james comey hugging and kissing which someone tried to find and they said they couldn't find those photos. but he also says there he was the fbi director. he worked for obama for eight years, which is not true. he worked for george w. bush eight years and then worked for obama for several more, but he came in under a republican president as the fbi director. so he's going after bob mueller personally, and i think you're
making a great point. he is trying to discredit whatever is going to come out in this report. but often, you get the best indication of what the president is thinking and what's enraging him just from looking at his twitter feed. and that's what the people closest to the president will tell you, what's he's complaining at night on the phone he tweets about the next day. and we're seeing this resurface in the president's twitter feed when it's largely been devoid of the criticisms of the special counsel and the russia investigation for the last several weeks when he has been focused on the caravan and the midterm elections. now that that's behind him, and he is still frustrated than, he is turning it back to this focus, because that's what he has been doing. >> let me ask jeffrey too, have you ever heard a president of the united states call a justice department investigation an illegal investigation, as he did in this interview with the daily calle erer? >> no. in fairness, bill clinton's team, not the president personally, but bill clinton's team certainly said a lot of bad things about ken starr.
there was no -- there was no hesitation about that. however, it is worth noting that the president -- anyway, never mind. that thought flew out of my head. it's not supposed to happen when you're on television, but it did. and i apologize. >> it's all right. >> i think one thing that's worth pointing out again, and we've talked this a lot is the special counsel is an office created by statute, by congress. this isn't some made up office, some conspiracy cooked up in a back room going back to what kaitlan was saying a minute ago. this is an office created when you have a situation where the justice department under the president might have a conflict of interest. in a case like this where you're investigating the president, if the president doesn't like it, calling it illegitimate is to say that the congress created a bad law. >> can i just say now, now the lawyers -- >> hold on, jeffrey.
let gloria finish. >> now his attorneys, the raskins, who are doing the negotiating have to deal with the special counsel on these questions, and we think they may be submitted very shortly. and they have to deal with the special counsel and the president has just called the investigation illegitimate, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. it doesn't make their jobs any easier, and rudy giuliani, who has not been writing the answers to these questions, i might add, and who has been sort of quiet has now stirred the pot again and made their lives, made the president's lawyers' lives that much more difficult because they're trying to get this part one done. as jeff points out, there is a part two, and we're not sure how that's going to unfold. and this does not help their relationship with the special counsel. >> jeffrey? >> what i was just thinking about what kaitlan was talking about how the president has been attacking mueller, it's worked. mueller was popular with republicans as well as democrats when this investigation started.
now the polls show that people feel about mueller like they feel about every issue regarding trump. about 55% are against trump and about 40% are in favor of trump. any issue you ask, whether it's the people in cages a the border, the charlottesville, everything is 55-40 against, and now mueller is a villain to trump's base, and that's how he's conducted his presidency, and it's worked. >> it's a good point. the president said today universities will some day study when highly conflicted and not senate-approved bob mueller and his gang of democrat thugs have done to destroy people. >> not senate-approved. what about senator ricker? >> everybody stand by. there is much more right after this.
and conference calls you can join without any dial-ins or pins. (phone) there are currently 3 members in this conference. i like that. i like that too. i would use that in a heartbeat. get started with innovative voice solutions for a low price when you get fast, reliable internet. comcast business. beyond fast. we're back with our analysts and the breaking news out of florida right now. a manual recount has now been ordered in the still undecided u.s. senate race between democrat bill nelson and republican rick scott. the contest very close after an initial machine recount. david swerdlick, it's heading towards this hand recount. what do you anticipate? >> i'm not sure nelson is going to make up that ground, but i do think it is important at this point for florida, for all the states where the races still aren't in to get this right. more important i think for either party than how many vote
or excuse me, seats they pick up in congress is that people have confidence in these elections. >> people aren't going to have confidence, gloria, if the president keeps saying there is a lot of illegal voting going on. >> which he does. people go change their clothes, put on hats, go back and vote. the president loves to talk about voter fraud. he talked about it during after he won the presidential election because he lost the popular vote by three million. a and he is talking about it now. and what he is doing is political. he is protecting himself and republicans should they lose, should it not turn out in their favor, then they can claim that it is fraudulent. and that works for him. he's done it. he likes doing it, and he is going to continue to stir the pot. >> but let's not forget that when the president was alleging that millions of people voted illegally in his election. >> three to five million. >> very specific number, he did form this counsel that vice president mike pence was in charge of potentially almost chris kovac, who lost his race last week.
>> in kansas. >> lost his race in kansas. but it goes to show that was formed. it's disbanded quietly. the white house put out a statement late one evening showing they were disbanding. that's what happened with the president's claim there was nothing there behind it. now the president is making similar claims here, alleging that there are these election officials who are rigging the vote without presenting any evidence. as we heard from someone who is a top ally of the president, matt gaetz of florida, the congressman, he is saying he believes this was essentially democrats saiding them up, doing a trial run for what they're going to do in 2020. that is what the president is hearing from people in his corner, and that is what he is pushing out to his millions of supporters across the country, which is concerning for critics because they think it's going to cast doubt over the future elections in the united states. >> it's very concerning, jeffrey. i'm anxious to get your thoughts, the president of the united states suggesting that there are millions of illegal voters here in the united states. there is no evidence of any of that. >> no, it's not that there is no evidence. that's a total lie.
it just is not true. and it is worth noting that ever since the supreme court in 2013 essentially eviscerated the voting rights act, what we have seen in state after state is republican officials, they have made it harder to vote. they have elim -- cut back on early voting, cut back on absentee voting, added voter id requirements, all in the name of stopping voter fraud. there is no voter fraud problem in this country. the problem is the democrats sometimes win elections, and that's what republicans are trying to stop by making it harder for poor people, for black people, for people who speak a different language to vote, because they're generally democrat. >> he is going to be spending the weekend i take it at mar-a-lago in palm beach. that's in palm beach county, which is one of the counties that came in late with the recount. >> and he is scheduled to go there on tuesday, which is when a lot of this is going to come the a head. he is essentially going to have this ringside seat as all of
this is going down. he has been paying such close attention to it that when he was in paris marking the 100 anniversary of world, he complained to aides he felt like he was missing out on the action back here at home. because that is when the recount was getting started. that is how close the president is following it. >> if there is a manual recount, maybe he'd like to join in, if he is going to be down there. >> if i could just add one point, the florida recount in 2000 was decided by a little more than 500 votes. that's what was at issue here. the margin here is 12,000 votes. it is virtually impossible to make up 12 thousand votes in a manual recount. so the president should relax, play golf. nelson is not going to win. scott is going to be the next familiar senator. >> we're going to watch this very closely. i did by the way buy some cereal. i did not have to show any idea to buy that cereal. everybody stand by. there is more news we're
following. very, very serious news just ahead. as the death toll mounts in the california wildfires, there is breaking news on how the president is now responding to the disaster. if you have postmenopausal osteoporosis and a high risk for fracture now might not be the best time to ask yourself are my bones strong? life is full of make-or-break moments. that's why it's so important to help reduce your risk of fracture with prolia®. only prolia® is proven to help strengthen and protect bones from fracture with 1 shot every 6 months. do not take prolia® if you have low blood calcium, are pregnant, are allergic to it, or take xgeva®. serious allergic reactions, like low blood pressure; trouble breathing; throat tightness; face, lip, or tongue swelling; rash; itching; or hives have happened. tell your doctor about dental problems as severe jaw bone problems may happen
or new or unusual pain in your hip groin, or thigh, as unusual thigh bone fractures have occurred. speak to your doctor before stopping prolia® as spine and other bone fractures have occurred. prolia® can cause serious side effects, like low blood calcium, serious infections, which could need hospitalization, skin problems, and severe bone, joint, or muscle pain. are you ready? ask your doctor how prolia® can help strengthen your bones. winning audience awards greeacross the country.ovie terrific. there's no better way to spend the holidays than with viggo mortensen and mahershala ali. they're so good, you'll wish the movie would never end. oh that was a good time.
mismanagement. tonight the death toll has climbed again, now up to 58, and 300 people, mostly elderly are reported missing. cnn's nick watt is joining us from calabasas out in california. nick, we're learning more about what it's taking to find and identify victims. >> absolutely. listen, wolf, nearly quarter a million acres have now burned. 9600 firefighters still on the ground. and up there in butte county, 10% of the housing stock is just gone. so 6,000 or 7,000 households now homeless. and as you mentioned, that death toll continues to rise. every day more bodies are found in the painstaking search of more than 10,000 structures destroyed by the devastating camp fire. cadaver dogs, the national guard, sheriff's deputies, even anthropologists are involved. >> helping us where we're trying to determine the difference between human remains and
nonhuman remains. because it's extremely difficult in these fires to make that differentiation for those of us that are untrained. >> the latest list of the missing has hundreds of names on it. many of them are elderly. being asked to provide dna samples to help identification. >> our mission is to try to find the victims from this fire, recover them and get them identified and notify the families to give them some answers. >> reporter: in southern california, yet another blaze, a brush fire erupting in a river bed to the northwest of the so-called woolsey fire. helicopter water drops containing this latest outbreak. the brush is dry, humidity's still low, even if those gusty winds have dropped. also around midnight, a firefighter from washington state hit by a car on the pacific coast highway. he was air lifted for treatment.
injuries not life threatening. parts of the pch, the main road in and out of malibu, have been closed since the fire began. now, partially opened for evacuees allowed back into areas now deemed safe. some returning to good news. >> the house was clean. the house was, like, fresh. >> reporter: now, the blame game begins, a lawsuit filed on behalf of camp fire survivors alleges pg&e failed to form the necessary inspections, maintenance, or repair of its equipment. pg&e did report an outage just 15 minutes before the camp fire ignited but the actual cause of that fire is still under investigation. some now saying warnings were also too little too late. the death toll from these fast-moving fires will likely rise as this gruesome search continues.
now, impa want to talk about th houses behind us because this tells us why california is facing these problems. as the population of the state exploded, more and more houses built right up against these combustible wildlands. see that ridge over there, apparently the fire took to get from that ridge to the back of these houses, took two minutes. and firefighters tell us that it was a firenado and those winds were whipping at 80 to 100 miles an hour. the guy in this house said he had time to grab his passport and wallet. by the time they got in their car, the house was on fire. >> so sad. sad indeed. nick watt on the scene for us. thank you very much. just ahead, there's more breaking news on the russia investigation as the president may be just hours away from turning over his answers to robert mueller's questions. and as a fellow republican now preparing to challenge mr. trump in 2020?
we have details. k at home? ordering it from outback. easily enjoy all your favorites when you order outback delivery or curbside takeaway right now. outback steakhouse. aussie rules. outback steakhouse. metastatic breast cancer is relentless, but i'm relentless too. mbc doesn't take a day off, and neither will i. and i treat my mbc with new everyday verzenio- the only one of its kind that can be taken every day. in fact, verzenio is a cdk4 & 6 inhibitor for postmenopausal women with hr+, her2- metastatic breast cancer, approved, with hormonal therapy, as an everyday treatment for a relentless disease. verzenio + an ai is proven to help women have significantly more time without disease progression, and more than half of women saw their tumors shrink vs an ai. diarrhea is common, may be severe, and may cause dehydration or infection. before taking verzenio, tell your doctor if you have
fever, chills, or other signs of infection. verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infection that can lead to death. serious liver problems can occur. symptoms may include tiredness, loss of appetite, stomach pain, and bleeding or bruising more easily than normal. blood clots that can lead to death have also occurred. talk to your doctor right away if you notice pain or swelling in your arms or legs, shortness of breath, chest pain or rapid breathing or heart rate. tell your doctor if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include nausea, infections, low red and white blood cells and platelets, decreased appetite, headache, abdominal pain, tiredness, vomiting, and hair thinning or loss. i'm relentless. and my doctor and i choose to treat my metastatic breast cancer with verzenio. be relentless. ask your doctor about everyday verzenio.
your insurance rates skyrocket you could fix it with a pen. how about using that pen to sign up for new insurance instead? for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise their rates because of their first accident. switch and you could save $782 on home and auto insurance. call for a free quote today. liberty mutual insurance. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ each unique piece comes to life in the same way...er business with her own two hands. a messy, sloppy, splattery way.
tonight, there's new fuel for speculation that president trump might face a challenge from a fellow republican in 2020. his former gop rival, john kasich, is in the leadoff primary state of new hampshire right now, and he's leaving the door wide open for a new run for the white house. let's go to our senior
washington correspondent, joe johnson. he's joining us from manchester right now. joe, you had a chance to speak with governor kasich about his 2020 options. >> reporter: i did, and i just got to tell you, people are filing in here for the last kasich event of the day in man che chester, new hampshire. a lot of questions for governor kasich. the first question is, are you in or out, governor? are you going to run for president? are you going to challenge the republican president which would be extraordinary, but there are other questions as well. what about the midterms? and he's also talked about the possibility of an independent coming straight down the middle and getting a lot of vote. so i asked him about his calculations, and his math as he makes his decisions. listen. >> i don't do math calculations. that's not what i do. >> reporter: well, you said before that you talked about a third party run but that doesn't sound viable. >> well, i don't know if that's true. all options are on the table.
and the question is, ultimately, can i have a very positive impact on the country, and i've got lots of people here. i was here yesterday and this guy comes to me and says, i don't care what you do, but wherever you go, i want to be there. and that's a really heartening thing. terrific. >> so you don't do the math on whether -- >> well, i mean, i have people that think about all these things, but that's not the way i've ever kind of decided what i was going to do in politics. i've run against odds in virtually every election, whether it was for governor, whether it was for my state senate race or whether it was for congress. >> reporter: one of the lines the governor repeated today in front of crowds and in front of cameras is that there is a vast ocean of voters in the middle, he says, after the midterms and he knows because they went to the polls and voted, not on the right, not on the left. that's why he thinks an independent run is possible.
the governor will appear here in a little while. interestingly enough, it's a first amendment event, wolf. barack to y back to you. >> thanks for watching. i'm wolf blitzer in "the situation room." "erin burnett outfront" "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com "outfront" next, the president meeting day after day with attorneys on his responses to mueller. rudy giuliani calling some of the questions possible traps. all of this as trump launches an epic attack on mueller. and melania trump says she's not surprised that critics have chosen to ridicule her for speaking out about what, what's prompting that bold statement tonight. plus michael avenatti arrested, blaming far right conspiracy theorists, specifically stormy daniels, meantime, says she might have to get a new lawyer. let's go "outfront." and good evening, i'm erin burnett. "outfront" tonight, the breaking news, president trump hunkered down with his