tv CNN Newsroom With Ana Cabrera CNN January 20, 2019 4:00pm-5:00pm PST
♪ it's 7:00 eastern, 4:00 in the afternoon out west. hello, i'm ana cabrera in the "cnn newsroom." thanks for being here. trump's personal attorney today telling cnn maybe yes, maybe no. talking about the president and his former attorney and fixer, michael cohen, possibly discussing cohen's testimony before congress in 2017. and even if they did talk about it, in the words of rudy guiliani, so what? michael cohen goes to prison in just a few weeks for a bunch of charges linked to his involvement with the president, including lying to congress. here's rudy guiliani today on cnn. >> did president trump or anyone
on the trump team talk to michael cohen about his congressional testimony before -- before he gave congressional testimony or after he gave congressional testimony? >> i can tell you -- first of all, i wasn't the lawyer at the time. >> right. >> michael cohen's lawyers reviewed his testimony with him. >> yeah, but -- did president trump -- >> no, no. let me answer the question! >> okay. >> as far as i know, president trump did not have discussions with him. certainly had no discussions with him in which he told him or counseled him to lie. if he had any discussions with him, they would be about the version of the events that michael cohen gave then, which they all believe was true. >> but you just acknowledged that it's possible that president trump talked to michael cohen about his testimony. >> which would be perfectly normal. which the president believed was true. >> so it's possible that that happened. that president trump talked to michael cohen about -- >> i don't know if it happened or didn't happen. and it might be attorney/client privileged if it happened. i have no knowledge he spoke to him. >> you just acknowledged that president trump may have talked to him about his testimony. >> and so what if he talked to him about it? >> is it not --
>> cnn's sarah westwood is outside the white house right now. sarah, that is a significant admission from rudy guiliani today, to say the least. and it's not the only one he made. while making the rounds on tv this morning. >> reporter: that's right. guiliani leaving open the possibility that president trump and cohen did discuss the testimony that cohen delivered to congress, where he made a false statement that resulted in a criminal charge. although guiliani repeated denials that president trump instructed his former lawyer to lie, and guiliani also raising eyebrows when he suggested that talks about a potential trump tower moscow deal may have lasted throughout the entirety of the presidential election, all the way no november. appearing on "meet the press" this morning, guiliani also said that president trump admitted as much in his written answers to questions from special counsel, robert mueller's office. take a listen. >> it's our understanding that they went on throughout 2016.
there within theeren't a lot oft there were conversations. can't be sure of the impact date. but the president can remember having conversations with him about it. >> throughout 2016. >> yeah. probably up to -- could be up to as far as october, november. our answers cover until the election. so any time during that period, they could have talked about it. >> now, this is especially significant when we look at the time line, because it was in august 2016 that intelligence officials warned president trump about russian attempts to infiltrate his presidential campaign. so if guiliani is to be believed, that means that talks about a potential trump tower moscow deal continued three months after then candidate trump received that warning. trump has also denied previously having any business ties in russia in july 2016. he said he didn't have any dealings with russia, but, again, if guiliani is correct, that means that the moscow project was under discussion when trump made that denial. here's trump in 2016.
>> i can tell you, i think if i came up with that, they would say, oh, it's a conspiracy theory. it's ridiculous. i mean, i have nothing to do with russia. i don't have any jobs in russia. i'm all over the world, but we're not involved in russia. >> cohen initially told congressional investigators that talks about trump tower moscow ended in january 2016, a lie for which he was prosecuted. mueller then said the talks stretched until at least june 2016. guiliani pushing that time line, even further back when his suggestion today. so ana, those comments from the president's perm lawyer raising more questions about the timing and nature of that trump tower moscow deal. >> sarah west wood at the white house for us. thank you. i want to bring in former federal prosecutor, michael zeldin, who worked with robert mueller at the justice department and also with us politics editor and washington bureau chief at "the
what do you make of the president's attorney, rudy guiliani, now admitting trump may have talked to cohen about his congressional testimony? but he says so what if he did? that is perfectly normal. is it perfectly normal? >> well, it may be if his joint defense agreement and the parties are speaking to each other about events in the case that they can speak to one another. what would be inappropriate, of course, is if anyone knew that michael cohen was going to make a misstatement or a lie to congress, and then in some way acquiesced in that lie. so it doesn't have to be as was the reporting in buzzfeed on thursday or friday, that the president directed cohen to lie for it to implicate liability for the president or anybody else. if they knew that a false statement was going to be made and they accepted it, they aided and abetted, conspired in it, that could bring rise to it. we don't have evidence of that, so depending on what it is that they talked about.
>> so just yes or no. to make sure i understand what you're saying. >> right. >> no, no, it was great. thank you for laying that out there. but i do want to make sure our viewers and i understand. if the president didn't necessarily direct cohen to lie to congress, but knew that cohen was going to lie to congress, then that could still be a problem for the president. >> i think that's right. you know, some may disagree with me. but i think if you have two people who are conspiring or agreeing or coordinating with one another, and one says, look, i'm going to give false testimony, the other one says, you know, cool, that's all right, go for it, that will protect both of us, that, i think, is criminal. as i said, we don't have the factual predicate for it. but it doesn't have to be a direct order, go lie, for it to implicate legal liability for the two parties. >> okay. and what about guiliani's admission that trump tower talks with russia may have lasted up until trump took office? is that problematic? >> well, i mean, politically,
it's problematic, because the president said he had no dealings with russia during a time period when he was in contractual negotiations with them. so you could be very lawyerly and say no dealings means i don't have a signed contract. but i think to the ordinary person, if you've got a 17-page offer sheet with them and you're meeting with them and you are discussing the possibility of building a tower there that could net you millions of dollars, that's doing business. so that's a political liability. because it doesn't seem like he was, you know, completely forthright with it. whether it's a legal problem, i don't think it's a legal problem for him to sort of lie to the american public, unless, of course, one takes the view that ken starr and some others have, which is if you lie to the american public as a means of improperly obtaining your office, then that could be an impeachable offense as set forth, you know, from the time of the convention in 1778 or
whatever it was. '6. joni will tell us when the convention was. george mason from -- >> don't test me. >> -- talked about that specifically, obtaining it by means of fraud. >> okay. let's talk about this idea of impeachment. i heard the word from michael there. i know you say it's time for lawmakers to go there. here's the cover of "the atlantic" again and your piece. you write, quote, the oath of office is the president's promise to subordinate his private desires to the public interests, to serve the nation as a whole rather than any faction within it. trump displays no evidence that he understands these obligations. so when you hear guiliani say the president may have been pursuing a business deal with russia throughout the entire presidential campaign, what do you think? >> well, i think the last 48 hours are a really great illustration of how badly this process is going and why congress ought to summon up the courage to do it right. the constitution gives us a process for weighing these sorts of claims now being levied
against the president. it is a process that congress can initiate at his pleasure. the house can convene an impeachment inquiry into the president. it can hear from witnesses. it can parse the evidence. it can put it out there for the public to offer a degree of clarity so we're not relying on second-hand leaks and contradictory reporting and not parsing rudy guiliani's statements. we're hearing directly from the people with knowledge of it. and these sorts of claims are troubling enough that congress ought to get moving. >> earlier i asked republican congressman adam kinzinger if he was concerned about this new time line from guiliani that moscow's trump tower or the thought of moscow trump tower and the talks about that potential deal may have lasted until november. to the election, he actually mentioned impeachment and warned against it. listen. >> it's definitely concerning in terms of, you know, we were told in january that it ended and now we know it didn't. you know, the president can say what he wants to say. if it's not under oath, it's not impeachable. so people that are quick to jump
on that train need to be careful on that. >> joni, do you think you're being too quick to jump on the impeachment train as kinzinger says? >> it doesn't mean to has to be a criminal act. there is remarkable consensus among constitutional scholars, and goes back to the convention in 1789 and followed forward through time. an impeachable offense is one in which the president betrays the public trust and undermines his office. it's a broad -- deliberately broad term of legal art that's adopted from british common law and brought over to the american context. and so the question here isn't, actually, whether or not the president has violated criminal statutes. it's whether his conduct meets that very high bar. and i think the fact we're sitting here tonight discussing it on the air is ample indication that the debate ought to be moved off of the streets, out of the cable news panels and into congress where it properly belongs. >> michael, do you think it's
too soon to be talking impeachment? >> well, i don't disagree with joni's proposition that this needs to be inacquired. one of the things that was troubling to me during the last congress was that so many of the hearings were held behind closed doors. so i don't know yet whether i believe there's a predicate for any sort of convening of a committee for the purposes of inquiring of impeachment articles. but surely the house and oversight committees should look into this and they should do so in public so that we get a sense of what is it that really happened here, who did what, who said what, so we can then perhaps move to where joni wants us to go if there is a predicate for that. >> i guess that is one question i have. why not wait for the mueller report to come out for all the facts to be laid out? i hear what you're saying, where it's not all about did the president break the law and you're looking at this one maybe sliver of what could lead to
impeachment. but could that be a dangerous precedent to set if that's what the i guess -- the bar becomes? >> sure. well, i think there are two answers to that. one is that a variety of claims lodged against the president are outside of the scope of robert mueller's probe. so, for example, michael cohen has said publicly in court and pled guilty to being directed by the president to break campaign finance laws, to aid in his election. that's not something that robert mueller is examining. are there questions about the commingling of his private businesses and public interest during his time in the presidency and during the campaign, as you noted? those questions, too, are largely outside the scope of the mueller probe. so simply waiting for it, it won't address those things. the other reason is that in past investigations, for example, in watergate, the special prosecutor moved forward with his probe in tandem with the congressional investigations. and they worked well together. this has to be a process that lays the evidence out before the public. it's not too soon to start that, because it puts rules, process
and procedure around the kinds of claims that are currently being bandied about without any of that. >> let's just look at the mueller report for a second, michael. there are questions over whether it will be made public. do you think if confirmed as attorney general william barr will release this report publicly? >> barr gave a legalistic answer in his confirmation hearings, which is to say that if the regulations authorize me to do so, i will. but i wrote a piece up on cnn.com earlier this week where i said, the regulations are not really clear about whether he has the authority, even if he wants to, to release that report. i think he can if he wants to. but i think he can also find a reason not to. and so really it's going to be based on the good faith of bill bar barr, whether we see the whole report or his summary of the report, which i think blends in some sense to joni's point. my view is, i would rather see it start at the congressional oversight committees before we move forward from that.
but i think the congressional oversight committees should be able to subpoena that report independent of release by barr, so we can see it and assess it and make a secondary determination of what should we do about its findings. >> michael zeldin and is it joni or yoni? thank you very much for being with us, guys. a deadly winter storm taking hold in cities all across the northeast right now. we'll tell you where it's headed next. plus, what's a super blood wolf moon? it's happening tonight. we'll explain. you're live in the "cnn newsroom."
my credit card only earns double miles on airline purchases! well, you earn double miles on this and on everything with the venture card. thanks! hey, by the way, how'd you get in here? same way you did. cross-checking. nice. what's in your wallet... oh, c'mon! with retirement planning and advice for what you need today
and tomorrow. because when you're with fidelity, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. because when you're with fidelity, [kno♪king] ♪ memories. what we deliver by delivering. millions of americans who woke to winter weather alerts this morning are now bracing for bitter-cold temperatures. snow blanketing highways from north carolina to maine this weekend. bringing dangerous conditions to roads, railways, airports. in fact, a plane skidded off
this icy runway at chicago's o'hare airport yesterday, where 650 flights were also cancelled because of the ice and snow. a snowplow driver in kansas died in a crash while clearing roads yesterday, and two people died in a wreck on a snow-covered road in wisconsin. and just this afternoon, a utility worker was killed in connecticut, when a tree fell on him while he was clearing a power line. meteorologist tom sater is joining us now from the weather center. tom, i understand the northeast will soon get some of the coldest temperatures of the season. >> that's right. of the entire winter season. and to make it worse, if the models are correct, ana, i think next week we're looking at even a colder blast that could be strong enough to get down to florida, and that citrus area. the storm is leaving the northeast, but in its wake, 12.5 inches, wisconsin. look at buffalo airport, 11. then over 10 in ohio. michigan and illinois. it was a deadly storm. even when it hit the west coast, we had those accidents. we had an avalanche at a ski resort in new mexico.
rochester, 18.5. erie, pennsylvania, 17. the list goes on and on. the snow and ice is going to be on the roads for a while with the cold air moving in. the good news is, we're starting to see it lift out of the areas. hour, hour and a half delays. newark and jfk right now, a ground delay at logan in boston. and a little concern still about the boston area and the suburbs northward, because it's not just the delays, it's the icing that could still take effect. you look at the heavier snowfall, yes, it's interior sections, 1 to 2 feet. still to come. but that ice could be a big, big problem for those trying to catch up on lost time. jetblue said 770 cancellations as far as that's concerned. but the cold air moving in is going to be brutal, as it moves in, wind chills overnight tonight, minus 5, minus 10, minus 15. the temperature drops are incredible. but then it gets even colder. we could see minus 30, minus 35. so we've got 70 million under some sort of advisory. >> ooh. i'm getting the chills just thinking about this, tom. i also hear there's this rare super blood wolf moonrising
tonig tonight. tell us about this. >> sky cover permitting. it's a super moon, the closest proximity to earth for the entire year. all of north america and south america will have a total lunar eclipse, including parts of western africa, maybe the united kingdom, as well. totality begins on the east coast at 11:41, when it takes on that orange color, that hue. that's when they call it the blood red moon. so it's super, larger, closer. it gets red. this is until about 12:43, its totality. enjoy this one. sky cover permitting. we're not going to have one for a number of years. in most locations with the exception of that storm still in the new england area, i think clear skies should give us quite a show tonight. >> how cool. tom sater, thank you. >> you bet. ♪ let it go let it go >> oh, my gosh. i hear this all the time at my house. my 3-year-old daughter loves
this song! and it was playing loud and clear in massachusetts. you can hear the laughter there when an officer played it from, of course, the movie "frozen" while patrolling the snowy streets in somerville. the man posted the clip on twitter saturday and said police were out enforcing a parking ban, and a fun way to remind people about parking rules during the snowstorm. this was the idea here. a day after the president's offer to democrats, falls flat. reaction now from someone personally involved. an arizona dreamer and college student will join us live, next. you're live in the "cnn newsroom." you've had quite the career.
i like working. what if my retirement plan is i don't want to retire? then let's not create a retirement plan. let's create a plan for what's next. i like that. get a plan that's right for you. td ameritrade. ♪ hey, darryl. would you choose the network rated #1 in the nation by the experts, or the one awarded by the people? uh... correct! you don't have to choose, 'cause, uh... oh! (vo) switch to the network awarded by rootmetrics and j.d. power. buy one of our best phones, get one on us.
welcome back. young, undocumented immigrants known as dreamers are back in the spotlight this week, and becoming a presidential bargaining chip. in the epic trump/pelosi shutdown battle, president trump tried to convince democrats into funding his border wall by offering a sweetener, temporarily funding the obama-era program that affects dreamers from deportation. the response from house speaker nancy pelosi, a firm no. i wanted to know, how do dreamers feel about the president's offer and the ongoing debate over his proposed border wall? joining us now, baylin seesa, a dreamer and college student. i first talked to you back in 2017 after that viral facebook selfie showing an irs 1040 tax form. you highlighted the fact that dreamers pay arizona state taxes. and so it's good to see you again. that thanks for being here. >> thank you so much for having me, ana.
>> the president put out his proposal last night, including a three-year extension of the daca program. what's your reaction? is that reassuring to you? >> well, let's start off with, my reaction is, i don't know if the president is completely ignorant to history or if he has gone delusional to what happened a year ago when he ended the program himself. if he truly cared about dreamers, if he truly cared about undocumented youth, he would not be using us as bargaining chips through his tantrum of getting a wall that makes no sense. the majority of the american public does not want. it's like lighting your house on fire and then going outside and trying to put it out yourself by blaming it on other people. >> what does it feel like to even be part of this conversation to reopen the government? you said you felt like a bargaining chip or that he was using you as a bargaining chip. help me understand what it's like to be that. >> it's horrible.
it's really disappointing and saddening to see that the person who is supposed to hold this country together is doing nothing but dividing the american people by holding immigrant youth hostage. and by placing the blame on everyone but himself while almost 1 million federal workers are not being paid. immigration has nothing to do with our own working class being paid. if anything, we want the government to reopen. we just do not want it to happen at the expense of throwing others under the bus. >> do you think the democrats should take this deal, just for your own sake, for peace of mind that the rug won't get ripped out from under you right now? >> i think they should absolutely not take this deal. and the reason why is because right now, daca is still in place. courts are upholding and protecting the program that president obama passed, and we will continue to fight, but we
will not do it at the expense of others. >> i want you to listen to something else the president said last night as he reflected on a naturalization ceremony that he had participated in earlier in the day. >> i told them that the beauty and majesty of citizenship is that it draws no distinctions of race or class or faith or gender or background. all americans, whether first generation or tenth generation, are bound together in love and loyalty, friendship and affection. we are all equal. we are one team. and one people, proud lily salug one great american flag. >> what did you make of the president's tone there? does that sound like a president who has become more empathetic to your family situation? >> absolutely not. if anything, this sounds completely hypocritical. his actions are not matching his speech. they're not matching anything
that he said. he is a person that has been running this country, and even campaigned on us not being equal. how could he turn around and slap us in the face? it is very, very noticeable. and honestly, i don't know how he's even trying to hide it. he is lying. i am asking the president, please stop lying and actually put forth a solution to reopen this government and for dreamers and our families to have permanent protection in the place we call home. >> as your future hangs in the limbo, what do you have planned at this point for your future? >> well what i have planned is to continue being civically engaged. i can't vote myself. but getting other people in this country, my peers, my neighbors, to take political action. 2020 is just around the corner. and dreamers, undocumented youth and our families, we are not giving up. and we will ensure that in the
elections to come, we will have allies in the white house, and we will have allies in the senate and congress. >> thank you so much for being here. let's keep in touch. >> thank you. >> thanks. it's the new cnn original series, style is a window to where we have been. it tells a story. we're talking about the original series, "american style." it continues into the 1980s tonight at 9:00 here on cnn. id ? at panera, we treat soup differently. with vine ripened tomatoes, signature cheddar, simmered to perfection. with big flavors, not artificial ones. enjoy 100% clean soup today. panera. food as it should be. we all make excuses for the things we don't want to do. but when it comes to colon cancer screening... i'm not doin' that. i eat plenty of kale. ahem, as i was saying... ...with cologuard, you don't need an excuse... all that prep? no thanks. that drink tastes horrible! but...there's no prep with cologuard...
i can't take the time off work. who has two days? and i feel fine - no symptoms! everybody, listen! all you need is a trip to the bathroom. if you're 50 or older and at average risk, cologuard is the noninvasive option that finds 92% of colon cancers. you just get the kit in the mail, go to the bathroom, collect your sample, then ship it to the lab! this is your year! own it! cologuard is not right for everyone. it is not for high risk individuals, including those with a history of colon cancer or precancer, ibd, certain hereditary cancer syndromes, or a family history of colon cancer. ask your doctor if cologuard is right for you. covered by medicare and most major insurers. ♪ [ telephone ringing ] -whoa.
[ indistinct talking ] -deductible? -definitely speaking insurance. -additional interest on umbrella policy? -can you translate? -damage minimization of civil commotion. -when insurance needs translating, get answers in plain english at progressiveanswers.com. ♪ -he wants you to sign karen's birthday card. it's a high honor. -he wants you to sign karen's birthday card. i never count trthe wrinkles.s. and i don't add up the years. but what i do count on,
is staying happy and healthy. so, i add protein, vitamins and minerals to my diet with boost®. boost® high protein nutritional drink has 20 grams of protein, along with 26 essential vitamins and minerals your body needs. all with guaranteed great taste. the upside- i'm just getting started. boost® high protein be up for life.
day 30 of the government shutdown is almost over, and still no end in sight to end this impasse. that means 800,000 federal workers, plus countless federal contractors will start another week not knowing when they'll see a paycheck. and former homeland security secretary, jeh johnson, says that is putting the nation at risk. >> the other day, i was in washington, driving along nebraska avenue, past my old headquarters at dhs. wednesday at 4:00. wednesday at 4:00.
and what was shocking to me was the parking lot was empty. nobody was -- almost nobody was home at the headquarters of homeland security, which includes our nation's cyber security. so we have to put these people back to work. i fear our guard is being let down right now, as long as our leaders fail to compromise to put people back to work, to protect us. >> that brings us to your weekend presidential brief, a segment we bring you every sunday night, highlighting some of the most pressing national security information the president will need when he wakes up tomorrow. joining us now, national security council adviser and cnn national security analyst, sam bennagrad. so much is at stake. what should the president be thinking about right now? >> the president should do something that is anathema to him, and that is thinking about the long-term impact of this shutdown. the truth is, the threats associated with the shutdown aren't going to go away once the
government reopens, because there are going to be resource drains well into the future. when we look at the range of activities that aren't being performed right now, the hundreds of thousands of jobs that aren't being performed because of the shutdown, we know that key national security functions are going unaddressed. you look at the fbi, where investigations aren't proceeding at pace because agents have to cut costs. the state department, where diplomats are cancelling meetings and not engaging with counterparts, which is their job, by the way, because of less resources. once a government reopens, there is going to have to be a very honest damage assessment of everything that we miss doing during the shutdown. and that is going to represent yet another resource drain, even when the government reopens, just so that we can play catchup. >> and that's the backdrop as we head into now a second summit with kim jong-un, the president and his team announcing it's going to happen next month. the planning process has begun, we assume. what should the president be doing to prep for that?
>> well, when we used to prep president obama for major meetings, we started out by asking for a baseline assessment of a foreign leader's intentions and the threats and opportunities that a foreign leader represented. at this point, the baseline assessment on kim jong-un is that he represents more of a threat today, not less, than he did in june at the singapore summit or even when president trump took office. and that's because his nuclear arsenal is actually getting bigger. not smaller. we knew at the end of 2017 he had upwards of 60 warheads. and kim said publicly in his new year's speech, he has not frozen production on nuclear weapons. he's continuing until we give him what he wants. that means that he is getting stronger from a nuclear perspective every day that goes by. and that really means that as we think about our goal for the second summit, we should be working at least towards a nuclear freeze. and any concessions that we give to kim jong-un have to be really, really carefully
tailored to match the fact that, again, he is negotiating from a position of increased strength, not weakness. >> there has been a lot of criticism of that first summit. a lot of people calling it really not much more than a photo op. what kind of progress could we expect from the second summit? >> from kim's perspective, progress would be just more of the same. which is a generally worded statement and some big declarations of denuclearization. we need to look for specificity on concrete steps towards denuclearization. and i fear the writing is on the wall. we have experts that work on disarmament. we have experts that work on denuclearization. we have the iaea, a national body, that does this. that's their function. we have not seen expert-level meetings, we have not seen consultations with the iaea. and for that reason, i don't
think that we can expect that there is going to be any specific steps that we have hammered out with the north koreans that they can take to actually start to denuclearize. >> thank you so much. one refugee says her baby was taken by chinese authorities and allowed to die in the hospital. while a young chinese student studying here says his parents were jailed or put in concentration camps. two of the stories highlighting the crackdown on minorities in china. an exclusive look at what's happening, next.
with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe eczema, or atopic dermatitis, you never know how your skin will look. and it can feel like no matter what you do, you're always itching. but even though you see and feel eczema on your skin, an overly sensitive immune system deep within your skin could be the cause. so help heal your skin from within. with dupixent. dupixent is not a steroid, and it continuously treats your eczema even when you can't see it. at 16 weeks, more than 1 in 3 patients saw clear or almost clear skin, and patients saw a significant reduction in itch. do not use if you are allergic to dupixent. serious allergic reactions can occur,
including anaphylaxis, a severe reaction. tell your doctor if you have new or worsening eye problems, including eye pain or changes in vision. if you are taking asthma medicines, do not change or stop your asthma medicine without talking to your doctor. help heal your skin from within. ask your eczema specialist about dupixent. but some give their clients cookie cutter portfolios. fisher investments tailors portfolios to your goals and needs. some only call when they have something to sell. fisher calls regularly so you stay informed. and while some advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management. from capital one.nd i switched to the spark cash card i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. and last year, i earned $36,000 in cash back. which i used to offer health insurance to my employees.
what's in your wallet? [cellwhere are you? well the squirrels are back in the attic. mom? your dad won't call an exterminator... can i call you back, mom? he says it's personal this time.. if you're a mom, you call at the worst possible time. it's what you do. if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. where are you? it's very loud there. are you taking a zumba class?
lawmakers are reintroducing a bill to hold china accountable for the mass internment of its ethnic muslim minorities. according to the u.s. state department, chinese authorities have indefinitely detained at least 800,000 such people in the past year-and-a-half. cnn's ivan watson spoke to a refugee about the horrors inside the internment camps. [ speaking in foreign language ] . >> reporter: there's a lot of love in this apartment in virginia between a mother and her children. but something, someone, actually, is missing here. >> this is amina. >> reporter: in 2015, she, then, a citizen of china, gave birth to triplets in egypt where she had been working and living. and barely a month later, flew home with them to a region of
western china. police detained her and took ese away her babies. >> i asked her, where is my baby? please give me my baby. and then -- >> reporter: taped your mouth. >> yes. >> reporter: she says police jailed and interrogated her for the next three months. the day of her release, she went to the children's hospital to see her infants. >> when i come, the doctors say, okay, my baby can go outside hospital. they say, yes, he die. i said, what? your son die this morning at 6:00. i don't believe, and i scream, why you kill my son? and they say if you scream, i call the police. stop. be quiet. and they give me my baby. so cold. i say, why he die? what happened? they say he is not strong, so he die. >> reporter: cnn reached out for comment from the children's
hospital, but did not receive a response. the surviving siblings have scars on their necks. a cnn medical expert says that suggests they, like their deceased brother, received inext intravenous tubes for nutrition at a time they should have been breastfeeding. she says her son's death was just the beginning of a three-year nightmare during which she was jailed two more times and tortured. >> they asked questions. when i say i don't know, they start beating me so hard. >> reporter: during the second imprisonment, she says she was put in a crowded cell with 50 other women, all ethnic wiegers from her home town. >> someone is my doctor, someone is my school teacher, someone is our neighbor. all people, 80% i know. >> reporter: the u.s. government alleges this is part of a much larger, frightening pattern. >> since april 2017, chinese
authorities have indefinitely detained at least 800,000, and possibly more than 2 million wiegers, and members of other muslim minorities in internment camps. >> reporter: beijing has gone from denying these alleged mass detentions to saying prisoners are getting vocational training. authorities recently took some diplomats and journalists on a carefully supervised tour of some of these facilities. ♪ some detainees told journalists the camps re-educate them. >> translator: all of us found we have something wrong with ourselves, and luckily enough, the communist party and the government offer this kind of school to us for free. >> reporter: the climate of fear can be felt halfway around the world. >> i lost contact with my family in 2017. and i -- >> reporter: so that was the last time you heard your mother's voice? >> yes. >> reporter: and your father.
>> yes. >> reporter: 21-year-old arfat erkin came to the u.s. three years ago to get a university education. but gradually, his parents stopped sending tuition money and stopped calling him. then last september, then last september he made this on youtube. >> my father is in prison and my mom is in concentration camp. >> if both of your parents are detained who is taking care of your 10-year-old brother? >> i don't know. >> if you could say something to your parents right now, what would you say? >> i hope they're just alive. >> afraid to go home, arfat has since been granted asylum in the u.s. >> they're terrified because they doesn't know what to do. they don't necessarily want to declare asylum in the united states because that reflects badly on their family but they also have been getting messages from the region that they shouldn't come back because they
will definitely be put in one of these internment camps. >> during her incarceration, this woman claims she saw fellow prisoners die in. >> so many people die, i become crazy. >> criticism of its human rights record saying these preventative counterterrorism measures protect more people from being devoured by extremism. she and her family are now in the u.s., going through the asylum process but it's not easy. her 3-year-old suffers chronic asthma attacks and she can't afford a pediatrician. one day, she tells me, she'll tell her surviving children the chinese government killed their brother. ivan watson, cnn, washington. >> cnn reached out to regional authorities multiple times for comment on this story and did
not receive a response. if you ever needed a reason to look before you jump into the water, here it is. what may be the largest great white shark on the planet spotted swimming with divers off the coast of hawaii. much more on this, just ahead. it's absolute confidence in 30,000 precision parts. or it isn't. it's inspected by mercedes-benz factory-trained technicians. or it isn't. it's backed by an unlimited mileage warranty, or it isn't. for those who never settle, it's either mercedes-benz certified pre-owned, or it isn't. the mercedes-benz certified pre-owned sales event. now through february 28th. only at your authorized mercedes-benz dealer. at to cover the essentialsyou have in retirement, as well as all the things you want to do. because when you're ready for what comes next, the only direction is forward.
oh, but seriously, it's good to be surrounded by what matters most -- a home and auto bundle from progressive. -oh, sweetie, please, play for us. -oh, no, i couldn't. -please. -okay. [ singing in spanish ] -please. -okay. ♪ lookin' better than a body has a right to ♪ ♪ and shakin' me up so ♪ that all i really know ♪ is here you come again, ♪ and here i go, ♪ here i go here we come again. applebee's all you can eat is back. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood.
the death toll is climbing, following a deadly pipeline explosion in mexico. at least 85 people are dead and dozens more are hurt in the wake of this huge explosion that happened friday night. it was about 65 miles north of mexico city. mexico's general prosecutor now says the preliminary belief is that this explosion was caused by static electricity from the clothing of people around the pipeline. prince philip has been caught on camera, apparently breaking the law. these pictures show him driving
without a seat belt. the photos were taken 48 hours after the 97-year-old royal crashed into a car with two women and a baby inside. you can see there, the prince's vehicle flipped on its side. he was not hurt thankfully, but the two women suffered minor injuries. buckingham palace spokesman says he passed a police eyesight test. as far as the prince without a seat belt, police say they've given him, quote, suit krabl words of advice. buckingham palace has not responded. remarkable images out of hawaii, divers with a very close encounter of the ocean kind. this 20-foot-long great white shark believed to be one of the largest in the world swimming right up to the boat and then deep blue, legendary by the way, caught on camera last time five years ago now swimming alongside this marine biologist, who got
so close she even touched it. the woman explained while some divers look down on this, she believes that sometimes sharks seek touch. >> she swam up. she wasn't even interested in us. she was just interested in brushing up against the boat. we looked over there and see there's a dead whale. we followed her over there and i did record her feeding on that whale. >> both the marine biologist and officials advise against engaging with shark this is closely, saying they can be unpredictable. a covington georgia police officer was honored by brian kemp during his state of the state address. watch this. >> he is a fire in the strongest sense of the word and a true hero among us. last year, he was wounded in the
line of duty and nearly lost his life. while chasing a criminal, he was shot literally right between the eyes. after multiple surgeries, i'm proud to tell you that he's with us today, next to his wife, kristen, in the gallery. help me in joining and thanking covington police officer matt cooper. >> that standing ovation lasting more than two minutes. after the speech, officer cooper took this fophoto with the governor. you can see he's wearing a special helmet, which is part of his recovery. cooper was shot in the line of duty on labor day when he was responding to a shoplifting call. his department calls his recovery nothing short of a miracle. and after weeks in the hospital and months in rehab, cooper was released to go home to be with his wife and two kids just before the holidays. you're live in the cnn
newsroom. i'm ana cabrera in new york. thanks for being with me. maybe they didn't, maybe they didn't. if they did, so what? that was president trump's attorney rudy giuliani discussing whether president trump ever discussed michael cohen's testimony before congress. >> you just acknowledged it's possible that president trump talked to michael co-n about his testimony. >> which would be perfectly normal. >> so it's possible that that happened, that president trump talked to michael cohen? >> i don't know if it happened or didn't happen and it might be attorn attorneyo client privilege where i can't acknowledge. i have no knowledge. i'm telling you, i wasn't there then. it's not significant because the version that he gave -- >> he's convicted of -- one of the things he pled guilty to, i believe, is lying to congress about the trump tower deal. >> which