tv CNN Newsroom With Ana Cabrera CNN January 26, 2019 12:00pm-1:00pm PST
hello on this saturday. you are live in the cnn newsroom. i'm ana cabrera in new york. good to have you with us. roger stone, long time adviser to president trump, has the nickname prince of darkness and dirty trickter is out on bond and doing a whole lot of talking ahead of the next court date on tuesday, when he will be arraigned on the 24-page indictment from robert mueller's office, charges allegedly lying to congress about his efforts to get dirt on hillary clinton from wikileaks. and team mueller writes quote, after the release of stolen dnc e-mails by organization one, or wikileaks, we know, a senior trump campaign official was directed to contact stone about any additional releases.
and what other damaging information organization one had regarding the clinton campaign. stone defiant yesterday, walking out of a florida courthouse flashing victory signs as he encountered a crowd chanting lock him up. he told reporters that he would never quote bear false witness against president trump. cnn's chris cuomo asked stone last night if i he thinks his loyalty will earn him a pardon? >> it makes me think that you must believe there is a light at the end of the trouble. you believe that light is not the train but it is the president and he will pardon you for keeping your mouth shut? >> i've never had any discussion with him or communication with him regarding that. i have no idea what he might do. the only persons that i have recommended a pardon for, is i wrote a number of op-eds as to why i think julian assange should be pardoned because i believe he is a journalist, he does the same thing as "the new york times" and the "washington post" do, and i have come out very strongly and written the president for a pardon,
posthumously for marcus garvey. >> our crime and justice reporter shimon prokupecz joins us now. stone is as mant there is no evidence he, he is adamant there is no evidence he clouded with russia. >> he has been adamant for quite some time if you think about it. he wassed a mant when he went before members of congress. and mueller and his team have found evidence, in the indictment, that that is not so much the case. and he went on chris cuomo's show last night to kind of parse and defend him, and talk about what he did do, and here's what he said about that. >> first of all, i always said that there could be some process crime, there is still no evidence whatsoever that i had advanced knowledge of the topic, the subject or the source of the wikileaks disclosures, i never received even the wikileaks disclosures, i never communicated with assange or wikileaks over than the limited communication on twitter or direct message which i gave to
the house intelligence committee last september, i guess it was. >> and ana, he's right. there is no evidence. and the indictment is not saying he is directly in any way communicated with julian assange but what they're alleging here he was using intermediates and there is the issue really, what he is charged with is lying, why did he hide, if this is true, they want to simply know why did he hide his contacts, why did he hide that he reached out to intermediaries, and also, as the indictment alleges, why did he threaten a witness who was going before the members of congress to talk about some of this contact. >> shimon, stay with us. we know stone is the sixth trump associate to be contacted. now, indicted, by mueller's team. i want to bring in other voices to discuss white house correspondent for "the new york times," michael shear, cnn legal analyst and former fbi special agent, cnn law enforcement analyst josh campbell. the huge question that we don't
know is who directed that senior trump campaign official to talk to roger stone, about what wikileaks might have come down the pike. realistically, who do you think that could be? someone directing senior trump campaign officials. >> right, there is not a lot of people that that could be, right? the trump campaign was a kind of skeleton place. it wasn't vast numbers of people. you could imagine it could be donald trump, the president, then the candidate, it could be jared kushner, it could be paul manafort, there were a handful of people who you could imagine would be senior enough that they could direct other senior officials to do it. and i think that's going to be one of the big questions. the other question that i suspect they are going to be looking at is were there other responses? did the information also being sought also go from the other direction? were the folks at wikileaks trying to communicate, back in the other direction, to the trump campaign, so that they could better time the releases of the information. and if you can sort of imagine
mueller trying to get that two-way communication, that may have been some of what they were looking for, on, when they raided, when they raided roger stone's house and offices. >> now, i want to go over the time line, because this is really important here. in june of 2016, dnc publicly announced the hack of the e-mails was done by russians. a month later wikileaks starts releasing that stolen information and roger stone is working with two intermediaries, according to this indictment, as he calls them, of course, intermediaries, the wikileaks, and that is wikileaks that is sort of the place that they're all focusing on this. goes all the way through the fall of 2016. but stone says in the indictment that it has nothing to do with collusion. let's listen. >> after a two-year inacquisition, the charges in no way relate to russian collusion, wikileaks collaboration, or any
other illegal act in connection with the 2016 campaign. >> does the indictment have nothing to do with collusion with russia? >> it does. it has everything to do with collusion. and at some point, i would love these people who keep saying no collusion, to maybe define the term, baups i think maybe they are just thinking of another word or something, that doesn't have the meaning they think it means. a collusion is a secret agreement to achieve an objective. and you know, what we have seen here is basically secret efforts to reach out indirectly by wronger stone to wikileaks, which is, roger stone to wikileaks, which is at the time acting as an intelligence arm of the russian government. and we know that wikileaks was directly coordinating with russia from the indictment of 12 officers which mueller has already filed. so to say that this is not collusion, i think we just have to go back to, if this was just a completely legitimate thing that any campaign would do, then
why take so many lengths, including threatening another witness, in order to cover it up? and so that doesn't make any sense. also, this was all being done even after the fbi provided a security briefing to the campaign, warning them that russia was going to be trying to contact and infiltrate their campaign. >> but i don't know if i saw the word russia in this indictment, and is it possible stone was in the dark about russia being the source of these hacked e-mails, that pleeks wwikileaks was rele and it doesn't matter whether stone knew who was behind the hack. >> if you look through the lengthy indictment, which we have read through all 24 pages several time, there is not mention of russia or colluding with the russias but keep in mind bob mueller doesn't have to tell us exactly what he has at this point, he only has to tell us enough to substantiate the charges in this document. as with any investigation, as
you're going through and gathering information, that may lead to additional charges. we don't have that answer to that question how robert mueller views this whole idea of colluding with wikileaks who was obviously in collusion with the russian government. but that said, defies credulity if you're roger stone that you didn't realize that wikileaks was dealing with stolen information and the cyber intrusion on the dnc, this was an illegal lack by a foreign intelligence service to gather information to ex filtrate it from the democratic national committee and weaponize and use it and to think that you didn't know that was illegal, no one really believes that. so whether roger stone knew this impacted russia or whether a nonstate entity like wikileaks that was pushing this information out, he had to have known that it was illegal. the question is what does robert mueller think of that? we will have to stay tuned to see if there are additional charges coming down throughout the investigation. >> our time line points out that russia was part of the picture at the time all of this was happening and it was months
after russia was directly linked to wikileaks, months after mueller says in this indictment that someone directed a senior trump campaign official to tell stone to keep getting stuff from wikileaks. we heard things like this, from then candidate trump. >> this just came out. wikileaks, i love wikileaks, this wikileaks stuff is unbelievable. >> another one came in today. this wikileaks is like a treasure trove. >> getting off the plane, they were just announcing new wikileaks, and i wanted to stay there, but i didn't want to keep you waiting. i love reading those wikileaks. >> shimon, how those significant might those old statements be to mueller? >> no doubt they could be very significant. i think the issue here, we have nothing in the sbimtd that says what roger stone was doing in reaching out to wikileaks or using intermediaries to reach out to wikileaks, there is nothing in the indictment that says what the trump campaign was doing to try to get this
information was illegal. we have not seen that yet. we don't even know if we're going to see that at some point. there is a lot of legal reasons for that, and i'm not going to bore people with that at this point. the issue really becomes what were people lying about. did they get to a point where they knew they were dealing with shady characters? as the indictment alleges. obviously, roger stone, they say, was dealing with wikileaks, intermediaries, and then when people started asking questions about those contacts, and what they were doing, they were lying about it. and in the end, what this may all be about is that people were trying to protect the president politically, and so they started forming these kinds of lies. we've seen this in the michael cohen investigation. where he lied to members of congress about the moscow project. we're seeing this now with roger stone. we've seen it with michael cohen, with michael flynn, excuse me, when he lied about his contacts with russia. so what is going on here really? we don't really have obviously a
full picture yet of why people were consistently lying to investigators when they would be asked about their dealings with shady characters. and so we have yet to see. what ultimately does the law say about wikileaks, what they knew in terms of where these e-mails were coming from, those are big questions. >> so the other question then, is the president directly connected to stone's indictment in some way. because the statements that are coming from the white house, as well as the president's personal lawyer, is that the president has nothing to do with any of this. take a listen. >> roger stone, the president's long-time political adviser, placed under arrest, what's your reaction? >> look, my first reaction is real simple. this has nothing to do with the president. and certainly nothing to do with the white house. >> and here's the point i want to make out of that. stone is now the sixth trump associate to be indicted. so michael, are we to believe that trump as a candidate and the leader of a campaign, just
never knew what anybody was doing ever? >> yeah, i mean look, i think the statement that she made, she was obviously trying to parse this in such have very, very specific way that you could sort of imagine that she is talking about, you know, this particular set of facts that maybe the president didn't know about. and the point that's been made before, i think, earlier now, is that, is that we don't know what more mueller has. and there may well be more evidence that could directly connect the president to some of these indictments. but stepping back, it doesn't matter. because this is all happening because of the president. his candidacy for the presidency, and now his election, and the fact that he is president, it's all connected to him, in that bigger sense, and none of this would be happening, we wouldn't have this panel talking about this, if this wasn't, if this wasn't people who were intimately connected to the president, and this is not a george
papadopoulos who maybe could, they could have argued, was only sort of tangentially a part of the trump campaign this. is roger stone who has been, one were his closest friends and advisers for years if not decades, so i think it is just laughable that the white house and sarah sanders are trying to distance the president from somebody like this. it is just not credible at all. >> also, that dramatic early morning raid that we saw, showing up before dawn, search warrant in hand, no interviews, no contact with stone, ahead of time, no opportunity for him to turn himself in. how often does it go down like this? >> i think it is standard operating procedure. you arrest people very early in the morning. it actually increases the safety for everyone involved because you have someone who is, you're getting them unexpected. and in this case, especially, we have somebody who, by, we know from the indictment, was trying to conceal the nature of his activity. and has also threatened another witness, including that person's
dog, so you know, there is a reasonable belief that this person may act in a desperate way, and/or may try to destroy evidence, which is a concern when you're also executing a search warrant. so i think that the early morning raid which was normal, as well as having a number of people on hand to execute it, which is also typical, but i think in this case, also based on some very reasonable concerns about how stone might have reacted, had he had a heads up that the fbi was coming. >> this indictment, josh, actually includes some mafia lingo which is somewhat comical as you read what stone was allegedly sending in these messages between him and one of these intermediaries, person two, as you see, outlined there, this is i believe creditco, he tells him to do a frank, a reference to a character in the godfather part two who w.h.o. lied to congress and the indictment goes on to say stone
actually threatened that same witness calling him a rat saying he would take away his therapy dog, also a reference, and even saying prepare to die. what's your take-away from that, josh? >> well, so obviously, we know that roger stone is a very colorful person. and it is important as a former investigator, when you're looking at individual subjects, what you have to do is call norming them out. what is a person's normal behavior and how does that square with some new revelation. so if this was any one of us that would have been using this language, it would have given me pause. not so much with roger stone because we know he is very over the top and very hyperbolic. and i think what it will come down to, other than the inartfulness, what was he trying to accomplish? was he trying to intimidate witnesses as alleged and tampering with the investigation. and the larger issue, you showed a graphic earlier with all the people, the sixth person in the trump orbit charged by robert mueller, these people continue to say that they are involved in so-called process crimes but
process crimes are still crimes. and beyond that, why are you lying? why are you committing a felony? what are you trying to hide? again, if this happens with one person, maybe they're trying to help themselves. but when it happens with six people and you continue to see this pattern, it starts to become easier to start drawing lines through something and we will have to wait to see from robert mueller, how does this tie together and more importantly what does he openly do with that. >> thank you. good to have all of you with us. coming up, the art of the cake. after 35 days of people going to sleeping in cars and not paying their bills, end can the government shutdown, the same deal the president could have had more than a month ago. was it worth all of the heartache? ( ♪ ) so, every day, we put our latest technology and vast expertise to work.
we will reopen the federal government. >> it has been more than three weeks. >> after 35 days of missed bills, and lots of stress and anxiety, a sigh of relief for federal employees, the government is back open, at least for now. the president vowed to keep the government closed until he got his border wall money. he didn't get a dollar in the end. he agreed to reopen the government for three weeks, while the battle over border security continues. and the reaction was swift. the new york daily news with two words, caveman, and this from the democratic leadership. >> hopefully now the president has learned his lesson. we cannot, cannot ever hold american workers hostage again. >> our power, that's maybe what the president underestimated. >> boris sanchez joins us from the white house.
what was the breaking point for the president to agree to end this shutdown with no wall guarantee. >> well, there were several different factor, for one, the president was watching his disapproval numbers climb, poll number force him were sliding. secondly on thursday he got a call from mitch mcconnell according to a source who says the senate majority leader told the president he was unsure how much longer he could hold republicans together on this issue. some in the gop became frustrated by what they saw as a lack of a plan from the white house, to end the government shutdown. and then third, yesterday, you had so many airports with delays, because air traffic controllers were calling in sick, over not being paid, because of the shutdown. so ultimately, the president decided to concede and move forward, giving democrats what they had been asking for, for weeks, and not getting a single cent for his border wall. now the president is trying to spin this, but let's focus on exactly why we had this government shutdown to begin with. and how the president said he would move forward. the only way he would move forward, and reopen it.
listen to this. from president trump. just a few weeks ago. >> i can't tell you when the government is going to reopen, i can tell you it is not going to reopen until we have a wall, a fence, whatever they would like to call it, i will call it whatever they want. >> so now, the democrats are emboldened by this. they appear to be united. as republicans are trying to figure out how to move forward in negotiations and the president is playing cleanup. look at this tweet he sent earlier this morning, writing, quote, 21 days goes very quickly, negotiations with democrats will start immediately, will not be easy to make a deal. both parties very dug in. the case for national security has been greatly enhanced by what has been happening at the border. and through dialogue. we will build the wall. despite the president insisting he didn't concede on this, the man who wrote the art of the deal did not win this round. >> boris sanchez, that is the truth. thank you. again, the good news here is, the longest shutdown in history is over but the pain and the
impact runs deep. the financial stress still lingers for hundreds of thousands of these federal workers missing two paychecks. we want to talk to alex hutchen, a tsa screener at the world's busiest airport in atlanta and alex, thanks for being with us. i know you have four children, five grandchildren, and what's on your mind now, and how are you feeling about things today? >> ana, i'm kind of feeling a little frustrated even though we're opening the government back up temporarily, so pretty much, what you're doing is, you're kicking the can down the road. we are trying to plan and live our live, not by 21 days. >> the big question now is when do you get your paycheck, are you getting any official guidance from the agency on a firm date when you will finally get paid? >> as of this morning, they sent out a text message letting everyone know that we should, if funding goes properly, we should start collecting our money by around thursday. >> thursday? not till thursday. >> i know, right? >> what was your reaction when you heard that. >> i said the same thing.
i said thursday. are you serious? i need my money today. >> no kidding. >> share with me what you have been going through, what you and your colleagues have had to endure during this shutdown. >> it has been very difficult. i mean a lot of screeners, you know, we're trying to actually do a job, professionally, but you also have in your mind that it's hard to do your job when you're stressing and trying to understand that you're not getting paid, you're not getting bills, constantly on your mind but you're trying to maintain a standard and do your job professionally. and a lot of organizations actually reached out to us. saint vincent depaul, an organization like that, delta airline, those guy, southwest airlines,s they was great, they did a lot of things to actually try to make it easier for us, like providing meals and providing light bills and stuff like that, paying light bills and stuff like that. but it was stressful, i have to go apply for food stamps. and these are prideful people.
and it is a shame the federal government has you in a position to suck your up pride and decide whether or not you are going to ask for federal assistance or state assistance that you don't feel you should have to do that. that's why you work. you work to avoid doing things like that. >> you work in a job that is in service to this country. i want you to listen to the president. >> many of you have suffered far greater than anyone, but your families would know or understand, and not only did you not complain, but in many cases, you encouraged me to keep going, because you care so much about our country, and about its border security. >> alex, i know you're worried that another shutdown standoff could still be brewing. and do you think we're going end up right where we started february 15? >> yes, i think february 15, we're going to be right back where we started off. you cannot solve a 21st century
solution with a medieval problem. the problem that we have, come on, seriously, it doesn't, it doesn't require all of this. you know -- >> what is the message you have to washington, to the president, to congress, who now go into this period of negotiation? >> my message to them is understand this, that this country was founded based on a premise of freedom for all, even though we went through our issues of not allowing everyone to have that same freedom, that their motto was, but understand this, though, immigration is not your problem. the problem is we're dealing with an america, it is an oppression. oppression is what is driving people to the opioids. people don't want to accept the fact of saying hey, i got problems. and so until i would get to, until we as a country get to a point where we can actually sit down and have a dialogue and understand that diversity, that's what this future, that's the future of the world, is about diversity, no one can get in their own little homes
anymore and say i am going to just deal with people within my circle. you got to reach out. if the only time you come across a mexican is when you get mexican food, something's wrong with you. >> so what i'm hearing you say is border security and specifically a wall is not worth another government shutdown. >> no, it's not. a wall is not worth this. no. not with the technology that we have. like i said, we got technology right now that can recognize the fact that tunlts are being dug under the ground. we have that kind of technology in this country. but we're, americans we're resolved, we will go through a lot and we will deal with a lot but at the end of the day, we will fix ourselves and move on from this. >> you talked about the pride people have and the work do you and government jobs have had always had this reputation of long-term security and stability. that's exactly why some people are drawn to this kind of work. did this shutdown or deal change your perspective on that front? >> no, it didn't change my perspective on that point
because that premise still exists. the promise is this right here. people have got to get out and vote. you cannot sit on the sidelines any longer and watch the world go by. because there are consequences to not voting. >> alex hutchen, i appreciate you being with us. good luck, and we wish you the absolute best. glad you will be paid soon. >> thank you. i appreciate. it hacker. fugitive. founder of wikileaks. a closer look at the role julian assange plays in mueller's indictment of roger stone.
shouldn't mean going back to the doctoro just for a shot. with neulasta onpro patients get their day back... to be with family, or just to sleep in. strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away.
in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card. to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing it's best to make you everybody else... ♪ ♪ means to fight the hardest battle, which any human being can fight and never stop. does this sound dismal? it isn't.
we want to turn back now to the indictment of roger stone. the trump associate who is now accused of seeking stolen e-mails from wikileaks, that could damage then candidate trump's opponent, while allegedly coordinating with senior trump campaign officials. a lawyer for wikileaks founder julian assange calls stone's pre-dawn arrest intimidation and says the quote military-style arrest was wholly unnecessary. stone also playing down his arrest and insisted he never sought the stolen e-mails in coordination with any senior trump campaign officials. we have joined by phil black, in london where assange remains holed up. phil, what have you learned about the extent of this alleged contact between stone and wikileaks? >> well, the wikileaks view, anna, is that stone's indictment proves what it says it has
always maintained which is that there was no direct communication between stone and wikileaks, or between stone and the organization's founder julian assange. the view of wikileaks, and assange's supporters, is that stone wanted access to wikileaks information, and it was, and he was very happy for some people to think he could get it. but he deliberately promoted himself as a conduit to wikileaks. and to assange. perhaps via a back channel. even though wikileaks insists no such line of communication existed. >> the charges today relate in no way to russian collusion, wikileaks collaboration, or any other illegal act in connection with the 2016 campaign. >> at the center of long-time trump associate roger stone's indictment, stolen e-mails from wikileaks that could damage hillary clinton's presidential race in coordination with the trump cam pain. >> anyone tell you to contact,
in the trump campaign to contact wikileaks. >> no, that is incorrect. >> but the mueller probe paints a different picture. back to july 2016, when wikileaks releases thousands of stolen documents from the dnc, damaging to hillary clinton. and then after that, a senior trump campaign official is directed to ask stone about more damaging information organization one, wikileaks, might have. by august, stone gets an e-mail from person one. now confirmed to cnn as stone associate jerome corsi, including these words. >> the word is, two more dumps. one shortly after i'm back, the second in october, impact plan to be very damaging. >> that friend, wikileaks co-founder julian assange, holed up in the ecuador embassy in london since 2012, evading fbi arrests on an unrelated matter, and potential extradition to the u.s. within a few days of the e-mail, stone claims direct communication with assange. >> i actually have communicated
with assange. i believe the next crunch of his documents pertain to the clinton foundation. but there's no telling what the october surprise may be. >> and sends this email to former trump adviser sam nunnberg, iodined by my new pal julian assange last night. >> stone later explained it was a joke. but was it? both wikileaks and others deny they ever met. and wikileaks maintains there wasn't even a back channel, tweeting friday, these are only stone, coursy attempts at brag darreno, no evidence of any back channel with wikileaks. amid all of these conflicting statements we know stone and wikileaks have communicated directly from these private messages on twitter, october 13, 2016, stone messages wikileaks, since he has been defending them and assange, they may want to examine the strategy of attacking him a wikileaks staffer replies, an attempt to distance wikileaks from stone. we appreciate. that however the false claims of association are being used by
the democrats to undermine the impact of our publication. don't go there if you don't want us to correct you. wikileaks tweeted this statement, from an assange lawyer friday. the charges against mr. stone do not allege that mr. stone lied about his lack of contacts with julian assange but rather about his contacts with others and about documents reflecting those communications. and goes on to say, that the office of the special counsel has never spoke within mr. assange. ana, as for assange, he is now well into his seventh year of being confined or perhaps confining himself to the ecuadorian embassy and that looks set to continue, because the british police say they will arrest him if he emerges from there. and a sang still believes that if that happens, he is going to be extradited to the united states. >> all right, phil black in london for us, thank you. coming up, the crisis in venezuela, the international community taking sides, and two men each claim they are the rightful president.
hey, darryl! hey, thomas. if you were choosing a network, would you want the one the experts at rootmetrics say is number one in the nation? sure, they probably know what they're talking about. or the one that j.d. power says is highest in network quality by people who use it every day? this is a tough one. well, not really, because verizon won both. so you don't even have to choose. why didn't you just lead with that? it's like a fun thing. (vo) chosen by experts. chosen by you. and now get apple music included, on us. it's the unlimited plan you need on the network you deserve. switch now and get $300 off our best phones.
welcome back. looking overseas now, a staggering tragedy in brazil and we may not be even close to seeing the full scope of it yet. this dam burst yesterday near the iron mine flooding it with water and mud, and hundreds were working inside the mine at the time, at least 43 people are now confirmed dead, their bodies were found, but nearly 400 people aren't even accounted for yet. dozens of people have been rescued. some of them literally plucked from the mud. something similar by the way happened about three years ago, a dam burst at a different iron mine in brazil, destroyed an entire village, killing 19 people. now to a deepening political crisis in south america. at least 20 people have been killed in massive anti-government protests in venezuela. an international power struggle is now pitting russia and china on one side, against the u.s. and most of europe on the other.
at issue, who's venezuela's rightful president? at the united nations, earlier today, secretary of state mike pompeo urged countries to reject russia-backed nicolas maduro. >> now it is time for every other nation to pick a side. no more delays. no more games. either you stand with the forces of freedom, or you are in league with maduro and others. >> i want to bring in diplomatic correspondent michelle kosinski, why venezuela? why is the u.s. willing to get so involved in this case when trump is constantly wanting to get out of other country's business? ie, syria. >> that's a great question. and there are a lot of reasons for it. and first of all, there is the massive humanitarian crisis there. with nearly 90% of venezuelans now living in poverty. the threat of further destabilization. refugees. already millions of people have left. so that could turn into a much bigger crisis here in the americas. there's also trade, namely oil.
the u.s. is venezuela's biggest customer. so if we get to the point that the u.s. is going to impose sanctions on the oil, the oil trade, then that could destabilize markets, and cause problems for the united states' economy, too. and then there is democracy itself. we've seen it nose dive in venezuela. so there is a vacuum there. the u.s. wants to establish a strong democracy with the help of other nations if it can, but you have other influences that you mentioned, russia and china, that could also, you know, they've been trying to get a real foothold there, in south america, in venezuela, so there's a chance for the u.s. to try to build up influence, continuing on, and we don't know really what the next steps are, either on the, you know, in venezuela, itself, with the duelling governments there, and other countries that are trying to change the situation.
>> the situation is complex. and we don't know where it is going to go. but the u.s. is now locked in. invested in the outcome. so michelle kosinski, we know you will continue to follow it for us. thank you for that report. coming up, republican congressman steve king holding his first town hall after being stripped of the committee assignments over racist remarks. ahead, how he's defending himself to his constituents. >> i even think about brett kavanaugh, when he went through that inquisition, he at least had accusers. i don't have accusers. not one soul has stood up and said steve king has ever acted in a racist fashion. >> i didn't really know anything about my family history. a leaf is a hint that is connected to each person in your family tree. i learned that my ten times great grandmother is george washington's aunt. within a few days i went from knowing almost nothing to holy crow, i'm related to george washington. this is my cousin george. discover your story.
start searching for free now at ancestry.com (clapping) every day, visionaries are creating the future. ( ♪ ) so, every day, we put our latest technology and vast expertise to work. ( ♪ ) the united states postal service makes more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country, affordably and on-time. (ringing) ( ♪ ) the future only happens with people who really know how to deliver it. the future only happens i saw my leg did not look right. i landed. i was just finishing a ride. i felt this awful pain in my chest. i had a pe blood clot in my lung. i was scared. i had a dvt blood clot. having one really puts you in danger of having another. my doctor and i chose xarelto®. xarelto®. to help keep me protected. xarelto® is a latest-generation blood thinner that's... proven to treat and reduce the risk of dvt
or pe blood clots from happening again. in clinical studies, almost 98% of patients on xarelto® did not experience another dvt or pe. xarelto® works differently. warfarin interferes with at least 6 of your body's natural blood-clotting factors. xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor. don't stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase risk of blood clots. while taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. it may increase your risk of bleeding if you take certain medicines. get help right away for unexpected bleeding or unusual bruising. do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. before starting, tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures and any kidney or liver problems. learn all you can... to help protect yourself from another dvt or pe. talk to your doctor about xarelto®. there's brushing...and there's oral-b power brushing. oral-b just cleans better. even my hygienist said going electric could lead to way cleaner teeth. and unlike sonicare, oral-b is the first electric toothbrush brand
iowa congressman steve king coming out swinging today at a town hall addressing head on allegations that he is racist. he slammed a recent new york times article where he was quoted as saying white nationalists. how did that language become so offensive. he was even removed from his committee assignments after that. sara sidner joins us now from outside the town hall venue. what did congressman king have to say? >> when he came on stage after everyone stood and clapped, when he walks in the room, he said that he wanted to address the elephant in the room, and that was the article and the accusations that he has been using racist rhetoric. that is not the first time we have heard racist rhetoric from steve king much he didn't deny he said those words. they were taken out of context, i'll let you hear in his own
words what he told the crowd here about 80 people showed up, not everyone was in support of him. but the vast majority of people were. those who weren't, some of them, democrats in the room. >> this is how he addressed what the article said and what he says he thought of it. >> it is stunning and astonishing to me that four words in a new york times quote can outweigh 20 some years of public service. 20 some years of giving you my word every day. and not one soul has stood up and said i ever lied to you or misrepresented anything, or given it to you in any spin that's anything other than what i believe to be the objective truth. i think about brett kavanaugh when he went through that inquisition, he at least had accusers. i don't have accusers even, not one soul that stood up and said,
steve king has stood up and acted in a racist fashion. there's messengerty of evidence out there to the contrary. >> but he does actually have accusers, there are some of his constituents. some of them who were inside the town hall area that did believe he was a racist, judging from not just what was in the new york times, but some of the other comments he's made along the way, and his retweeting for example of white nationalists in the past. so you certainly did have some folks, although there were several democrats, 2 or 3 democrats that were in the room, they are his constituents, they live in the district who were concerned he was not going to be able to fully do his job in congress with what has happened, him being stripped of those congressional committees. >> so how did he respond when they asked him about that specifically, about him being stripped of the house committee assignments? >> he talked about the fact that
he says, look, i'm going to start working with the executive branch. he's going to start working with the president. trying to get things done alongside the president, he said that this would allow him to be in congress for every single congressional vote that he can speak now for every time that he feels the need to speak on the floor of the congress. so he said that's how he was going to work around being stripped of those committees, you can hear that he's quite upset about the fact that he is no longer on those committees, if you will, brett. >> he's been sidelined. sara sidner, the white house tries to distance itself from roger stone. the problem is, president trump and stone have a history that goes back decades many. >> i am one of his oldest friends, i am a fervent supporter of the president. come here, babe.
try alka-seltzer pm gummies. the only fast, powerful heartburn relief, plus melatonin so you can fall asleep quickly. oh, what a relief it is! ♪ when you have nausea, ♪ heartburn, ♪ indigestion, ♪ upset stomach, ♪ diarrhea... girl, pepto ultra coating will treat your stomach right. ♪nausea, heartburn, ♪ indigestion, upset stomach, ♪ diarrhea... try pepto with ultra coating.
the latest inisn't just a store.ty it's a save more with a new kind of wireless network store. it's a look what your wifi can do now store. a get your questions answered by awesome experts store. it's a now there's one store that connects your life like never before store. the xfinity store is here. and it's simple, easy, awesome. i can worry about it, or doe. something about it. garlique helps maintain healthy cholesterol naturally, and it's odor-free, and pharmacist recommended. garlique
you're live in the cnn newsroom. thanks for staying with me. roger stone a free man today, he will be back in court on tuesday. that will be his arraignment on a list of charges that draws the clearest and darkest line yet between president trump's campaign and a pile of stolen e-mails hacked by russia, and made public by wikileaks. the man who calls him a dirty trickster now indicted on charges he obstructed justice and lied to the special counsel and tampered with witnesses. a senior trump campaign official was directed to contact stone about any additional releases and what other damaging