tv CNN Tonight With Don Lemon CNN March 13, 2019 12:00am-1:00am PDT
this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. paul manafort, president trump's former campaign chairman, about to be sentenced for a second time. he'll appear before judge amy berman jackson in federal court in washington, d.c. tomorrow. manafort faces up to ten years in prison for his guilty pleas to charges of conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct justice. judge jackson has proved to be tough on him. she revoked his bail, put him behind bars last june after concluding he tried to coach potential witnesses. and last month jackson said that manafort lied about his communications with konstantin kilimnik, a russian who is a former business associate of manafort's. robert mueller's team says kilimnik is linked to russian intelligence. don't forget that last week a federal judge in virginia stunned the courtroom by sentencing manafort to only 47 months in prison for his conviction of eight financial crimes including tax and bank fraud. prosecutors had recommended a
sentence between 19 and 24 years. let's discuss. shimon prokupecz is here, matthew rosenberg, and asha rangappa. good evening to all of you. i'm going to start with you shimon. tomorrow is a big day for manafort and mueller. what can we expect? >> right. so, you know, this will be early in the morning around 9:30 or so, we expect paul manafort and his team to come in. we'll hear some legal arguments. the big question is going to be, don, as you said, what will the sentence ultimately be for paul manafort? does the judge go ahead and give him the maximum, which is the ten years on the two counts, five each, or does she give him any kind of a break here? we certainly saw that break in the case in virginia where if you recall, the judge there said that paul manafort had lived basically a blameless life before anything -- before he was involved in anything that he was charged with. the big question now is what will happen tomorrow. will the judge go ahead and give him the maximum? she, as you said, has had a very different view of paul manafort throughout this case, throughout
this investigation. the judge in virginia having a little more compassion for him, kind of, you know, had quite the opinion on the whole mueller investigation. her opinion of the whole mueller investigation has been quite different. so the big thing obviously is does he get an additional ten years, five years? what more is he facing? >> interesting. as i said, asha, this judge, judge jackson is the one who sent paul manafort to jail after he was accused of witness tampering, also ruled that he breached his plea deal by lying to prosecutors about his russian associate, konstantin kilimnik. you think this is going to factor into tomorrow's sentencing? >> yes, i think so. i mean this judge ain't playing, you know? but i think that we have to wait and see. i mean, look, we give judges incredible discretion on how much to sentence defendants, and i think we were taken by surprise last week. so let's see. but i mean in this case, you
know, in her courtroom, he has engaged in incredibly unsavory behavior from the court's perspective. he has obstructed justice. he's tampered with witnesses. he's lied to prosecutors. so i can't imagine that she would look kindly upon that. and, look, one way or the other, he's going to jail. i think the real question here is what will trump do after the sentence is rendered? is he going to pardon manafort, or will he let the sentence stand? >> interesting. let's talk a little bit more about konstantin kilimnik, matthew, manafort's co-defendant in this case, reportedly tied to russian intelligence. what more could we learn about this relationship between manafort and kilimnik? >> we already know a lot. we know that manafort tried to share campaign polling data with him and that he appeared to be a link between manafort and russian intelligence and, you
know, russian oligarchs who also have ties to the kremlin. we could learn more about the relationship. we could learn more of what the mueller team knows, if there was more engagement there. i think also, you know, the judge is going to be under tremendous -- there's going to be tremendous public outcry and that creates real pressure to give manafort a strict sentence. you've had public defenders talking about their clients who got three to six years for st l stealing $100 worth of quarters from a laundry machine, and that's going to make it -- judges don't live in a vacuum. they hear and see this stuff too. >> and then there's, you know, besides the manafort sentencing tomorrow, there's also roger stone's hearing on thursday and sentencing update for rick gates on friday. are all of these developments a sign that mueller's report is imminent, shimon prokupecz? >> i do think there are lots of indications here that this thing is essentially on these main
core players of this investigation is all really wrapped up. when you look at michael flynn, we had an update on him today. he's essentially done cooperating. paul manafort was the first person indicted, first person that the mueller team, you know, essentially indicted, was a main player in this entire investigation. remember, it was before judge berman jackson, which is where tomorrow's proceedings is, where we learned that paul manafort in this meeting with konstantin kilimnik was the center, was the heart of the mueller investigation. so with tomorrow's end with the sentencing, paul manafort is done in terms of the special counsel's office. but the main part of this investigation is over. the big thing is, though, i think is rick gates. we've heard so little about him, and he has spent all this time cooperating. and we have learned a lot about his cooperation. he certainly helped him learn a lot about paul manafort's activities, the meetings with this russian kilimnik guy. so rick gates has been a bigger figure in this entire
investigation. getting an update on him is going to be a key sign of whether or not the department of justice is done with his cooperation. we believe that he's cooperating in other parts of the department of justice, specifically in the southern district of new york, where there are other investigations. so i'm looking forward to that to see what happens there. but it does seem that the key players, the key parts of this investigation, are being wrapped up. >> what about flynn because there was supposed to be a flynn sentencing update tomorrow, but that was just canceled. what does that mean for the president's former national security adviser and for this case? >> right. so flynn, they up dated us today on it a couple hours ago. they put that out. he's trying to delay his sentencing. what happened last night, as you will recall, is that the judge surprised everyone in this dramatic fashion, held this hearing, went after michael flynn, thought that he should go to jail. the prosecutors had no position. they were saying zero to six months. the judge was not satisfied with that and hinted strongly to
michael flynn that he should delay his sentencing because he's continuing to cooperate. but that's a former business partner of his and a case out of georgi va. but interestingly in the filing, his status doesn't really change. what the government has said is they're pretty much done with him. he's cooperating in this other case, but it's not a mueller investigation. of course they could always go back to him. he also, for all intents and purposes, he is done. the big thing here what's going on is they want to delay it because they're afraid that michael flynn -- his lawyers are afraid that the judge is going to put him in jail. >> so, matthew, we're all focused on mueller's criminal investigation, but former prosecutor nelson cunningham says that mueller is also continuing the counterintelligence investigation that started with suspicious trump/russia contracts in 2016. could this mean double trouble for the president? >> look, counterintelligence investigations are -- they tend to remain secret. they tend to be about countering
another country's intelligence services. it's not about criminal charges. so i don't know if it means double trouble that we're going to find out about anytime soon, but it certainly does seem like there is something going on here, that people around the president are still the focus of what investigators are looking at. and those can sometimes yield criminal charges. you know, this stuff has become very hard to predict. i think shimon can tell us that. >> mm-hmm. >> but it remains a concern, and that's pretty clear. >> yeah. asha, cunningham says that unlike a final criminal report, a mueller counterintelligence report must be shared with congress, and then he writes -- he says, the house and senate intelligence committees are legally entitled to be given reports in writing of significant intelligence and counterintelligence activities or failures. mueller's findings will certainly qualify. so he thinks there could be a second mueller report. you think he's on to something? >> i think it was a very
interesting take, and i think he's absolutely right that there is a very large back story of what mueller has gathered that may not see the inside of a courtroom. and so his report to the attorney general, which is limited to criminal charges, the charges that he has chosen to pursue or has declined to pursue, will not tell the whole story. but i think that congress could have this other avenue to get this other information of what may pose a national security threat to the united states. and as matthew just mentioned, may not warrant criminal charges or may not necessitate criminal charges because doing so could divulge, you know, sentence methods or sources or give away what we know to our adversaries, but may still be of interest and, you know, to congress in terms of deciding how to proceed with that information. and they may have that avenue through the intelligence committees to get that. >> i've got to ask you this
while you're here, asha, about this massive college admissions scandal. you were the dean of admissions at yale law school for over 12 years. did you ever think that something like this could happen? >> you know, i mean reading things like this, don, makes me so angry because so much of what i did at admissions dean was to go out and try to recruit students who didn't think they had a chance to put their hat in the ring. and, look, let's not kid ourselves. there are structural issues in admissions that do benefit people with access to resources, people who can take test prep courses or get help on their essays and stuff like that. but outright bribery, getting people to take tests for you, this distorts the admissions process and the way that people like me were trying to make fair decisions on people. and i just -- it upsets me that there may be people who are
discouraged from shooting high because of this kind of unethical and illegal behavior by a select few. >> asha, thank you for that. matthew, thank you as well and shimon. i appreciate your time. did michael cohen leave a trail of bread crumbs for investigators in his testimony last month? and what clues are investigators in new york following? we're going to dig into that next. pardon the interruption but this is big! now with t-mobile get the samsung galaxy s10e included with unlimited data for just $40 a month.
audible members know listening has the power to change us make us better parents, better leaders, better people. and there's no better place to listen than audible. with audible you get a credit good for any audiobook and exclusive fitness and wellness programs. and now, you'll also get two audible originals: titles exclusively produced for audible. automatically roll your credits over to the next month if you don't use them, and if you don't like a book just swap it for free. enjoy 100% ad free listening in the car, on your phone or any connected device. and when you switch a device pick up right where you left off.
with our commitment free guarantee, there's never been a better time to start listening to audible. the most inspiring minds, the most compelling stories, the best place to listen. to start your free 30-day trial, text listen9 to 500500 today. ♪ this is charlie not coughing because he took delsym 12-hour. and this is charlie still not coughing while trying his hardest not to wake zeus. delsym 12-hour. nothing lasts longer for powerful cough relief. since you're heading off to dad... i just got a zerowater. but we've always used brita. it's two stage-filter... doesn't compare to zerowater's 5-stage. this meter shows how much stuff,
or dissolved solids, gets left behind. our tap water is 220. brita? 110... seriously? but zerowater- let me guess. zero? yup, that's how i know it is the purest-tasting water. i need to find the receipt for that. oh yeah, you do. so the president launching a twitter tirade against his home state of new york and governor andrew cuomo, calling them presidential harassers. this after new york state's attorney general subpoenaed two banks for records about multiple trump organization projects and an attempt by the president to buy the buffalo bills in 2014. let's bring in jed sugarman, the author of the people's courts. david cay johnston is here as well, the author of, it's even worse than you think: what the trump administration is doing to america. gentlemen, good evening. thank you both for joining me. david, i'm going to start with
you. this investigation appears to have come out of michael cohen's testimony last month. this is a few weeks ago. this is what he said about the president when the president was attempting to buy the buffalo bills. watch this. >> i am giving to the committee today three years of mr. trump's personal financial statements from 2011, 2012, and 2013, which he gave to deutsche bank to inquire about a loan to buy the buffalo bills and to forbes. >> did the president ever provide inflated assets to a bank in order to help him obtain a loan? >> these documents and others were provided to deutsche bank in one occasion where i was with them in our attempt to obtain money so that we can put a bid on the buffalo bills. >> so the attorney general is now acting on this. what kind of crimes are we talking about there potentially?
>> well, if he actually got a loan, he has signed documents under penalty of perjury. he didn't get the loan for the bills, partly because to buy the bills, he would have had to put up a little over $1 billion in cash, which he didn't have. that's how the rules work of the nfl. but if this leads to other documents coming forward from deutsche bank that show he actually got loans on other occasions where he misstated his finances, then he's facing potential bank fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud charges. and one of the things we may also learn from this is was it really deutsche bank that was loaning him money over the years, or was deutsche bank acting on behalf of etb, the russian spy bank, or some other russian entity? and the risk was on those people, or did they somehow privately guarantee it? there could be a lot here. maybe there's nothing here. we don't know yet. >> you don't know. you're shaking your head here. what -- >> look, the big picture -- first of all, it's amazing that
donald trump couldn't get an nfl franchise because they have a character clause. so he could become president of the united states, but he couldn't become an nfl owner in that world. >> think about what just transpired in the last couple -- >> absolutely. where is that bar? but the big picture is that many people speculate that deutsche bank has been the conduit for not just in that window of time but way back for many years, the conduit for money laundering. and deutsche bank was the only western bank that would do money with trump, and deutsche bank is renowned for being -- and has been fined billions of dollars for money laundering with russia and eastern europe. >> deutsche bank has paid over $22 billion in fines of all kinds and over $600 million just for russian money laundering. their profits last year were about 300 million euros. they're not that big a bank. so you have to wonder, you know, why are they taking risks loaning money to donald trump when every other bank walk as way and says, we're not going to do business with you. you don't pay loans back. remember during the campaign, he said, i borrowed money knowing i
wasn't going to pay it back. >> then why would they do it? >> that's the great $64,000 question. >> let's talk about your piece in "the new york times" just yesterday, jed. you called for the new york a.g. to do exactly this kind of investigation, a civil proceeding against the trump organization, one that could end up with the company being dissolved. how extensive to the crimes have to be to warrant that. >> the steps they took last night, the crimes don't have be to in grand scope. it could be a business is engaged in fraud and what they acted on is -- and keep in mind this is confusing to some republican officials today this. is the new york state attorney general, so this independent of federal interference. so the crimes can be relatively narrow for them to act. but the next step as they find out more from deutsche bank about not just some of these federal crimes but state crimes consist in new york of bank fraud, insurance fraud, and tax fraud. if they find enough pattern of
persistent fraud, the new york attorney general, under another statute, can bring a petition to dissolve the trump organization in new york state. >> and we have effectively a state rico statute, which maybe you can reach at some point. >> maybe. so the subpoena from the new york a.g. is looking for document about deutsche bank's dealings with the trump hotel, properties in chicago, in d.c., a golf course outside of miami, records relating to the president's failed bid to buy the buffalo bills. what does this tell you about this investigation? >> well, nobody seriously looked ever at donald's finances. when he was a casino owner, the casino regulators admitted from the time he got licensed for 12 years, they never once looked at his money or checked him out at all. and so this is the first time we've had someone with subpoena power, not people like me looking around to find where they've dropped something in a public record or a court hearing, but subpoena power to compel the production of documents, that has had the opportunity to really go after him. and tisha james during the campaign said elect me, and i'm going to go really examine this
guy. >> this is a civil investigation, not a criminal one. so what significant consequences, if any, could the president and his family face? >> right. it starts with the new york attorney general on the civil side. but this is an opportunity for the new york attorney general's office to share information with both new york state prosecutors like cyrus vance in manhattan. this is a chance for him to redeem himself because he dropped the ball. his office had the goods on ivanka trump and don junior for criminal real estate fraud. he can get in on a state prosecution, but they can also share information with federal prosecutors in the southern district of new york. >> and cuomo can grant the attorney general -- >> andrew? >> andrew cuomo can grant letitia james criminal investigative authority if he wants to. and if it's totally safe for him to do so at some point because what came out civilly, i expect he would probably do that. >> or governor cuomo, we should say. this is all the investigations currently under way against the trump administration, the
inauguration, transition. you can see them all. it's just astounding. how is any governing getting done, david? >> has there been any governing? we still have an acting faa director. we have all sorts of unfilled positions. we have major countries where there's no u.s. ambassador more than two years after he took office. >> yeah. does he have any power with state investigators? >> no. so this is a key issue here is that first of all, trump -- a presidential pardon only affects federal criminal liability. the key name to look for in the future is allen weisselberg, who is the cfo of the trump organization. if there was money laundering, allen weisselberg, who is already in jeopardy because of the campaign finance and the testimony about the bank fraud with deutsche bank, weisselberg could be compelled because of state indictments to then cooperate, and he can't bank on, if you will, a presidential pardon to get him off the hook because it also means that trump
can't interfere with state prosecutors or a state attorney general. >> thank you. that's got to be the last word. i appreciate your time. a new book is claiming that president trump wants his own daughter and son-in-law pushed out of the white house and sent back to new york, and there's a lot more. paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free.
shipstation. the #1 choice of online sall of you. how you live, what you love. that's what inspired us to create america's most advanced internet. internet that puts you in charge. that protects what's important. it handles everything, and reaches everywhere. this is beyond wifi, this is xfi. simple. easy. awesome. xfinity, the future of awesome.
s a new book about to take washington by storm and it focuses on ivanka trump and jared kushner. "the new york times" says the book seeks to tell the behind the scenes story of their rise to extraordinary power in the white house. cnn white house reporter kate bennett has more now. >> reporter: washington buzzing about a new book "kushner inc." by writer vicky ward, and its focus on ivanka trump's unprecedented role as both daughter and influential adviser to the president. a murky area ivanka has had to define. >> people think you're going to be part of the administration, ivanka. >> no, i'm going to be a daughter. >> reporter: the family connection has led to complicated political issues. ward writes how ivanka defended her dad after the deadly
charlottesville protests. trump saying there was, quote, blame on both sides. ivanka adamantly sticking up for her father. ward writes, ivanka told white house economic adviser gary cohn, who was rocked by trump's remarks and by ivanka's response, quote, my dad's not a racist. he didn't mean any of it. publicly she's played the role of defiant daughter, side-stepping salacious headlines. >> do you believe your father's accusers? >> i think it's a pretty inappropriate question to ask a daughter if she believes the accusers of her father when he has affirmatively stated that there's no truth to it. >> reporter: saying privately she's able to voice her opinion. >> i'm part of a staff. he's the president. i'm part of a team. >> reporter: ivanka tasked with tackling policy issues from family work leave funding to economic empowerment for women.
trump, in return, heaping praise as both boss and father, sometimes with cringe-worthy results. >> she's so good. she wanted to make the trip. she said, dad, can i go with you? she actually said, daddy, can i go with you? i like that, right? daddy, can i go with you? i said, yes, you can. >> reporter: and just this week during a white house meeting -- >> she's so formal. a special person, and she's worked so hard as you all know. >> reporter: the book also taking a look at ivanka's west wing role. ward writes, citing a source at the state department, ivanka would request travel on air force planes, and if the request was denied, ivanka and kushner would then invite along a cabinet secretary, often treasury secretary steven mnuchin, in order to gain access. but is ivanka adviser, daughter, or perhaps the answer is both? the result, in washington, more scrutinized than perhaps any other presidential family member
in modern history. >> there is a level of viciousness that i was not expecting, but this isn't supposed to be easy. >> so here with me now, kate bennett, also michael d'antonio, the author of the truth about trump. good evening to both of you. kate, according to this book excerpt, are ivanka and jared the moderating influence on the president as they are often portrayed? >> i mean that has been the sort of underlying vibe, i guess, since the beginning of the administration, and it may actually be true simply because, quite frankly, they're still there. this is a power couple inside the west wing and through all the tumultuous turnover, the back-stabbing, the chaotic nature of staffing issues we've seen over the past two years. ivanka trump and jared kushner have had the most staying power, the most influence, and quite frankly the most vast portfolios really of anyone closest to the president. so i think that says a lot about
their influence on the president, the family connection, and that weird sort of gray area where those two things verge and connect. he feels comfortable with them. they feel comfortable speaking to him. and i think that that -- sort of therein lies their sticking power. >> vicky ward writes over the past two years, the president has wanted on and off to get rid of ivanka and jared. she writes when he hired john f. kelly as chief of staff, a move that ms. trump and mr. cusher supported at the time, he gave an early directive. get rid of my kids. get them back to new york, that his children didn't know how to play the game and generated cycles of bad press. mr. kelly responded that it would be difficult to fire them, but he and the president agreed that they would make life difficult enough to force the pair to offer their resignations, which the president would then accept. so ivanka and jared are still working in the white house, michael.
john kelly has since resigned. they are the survivors. >> well, they are the survivors. you know, there are two things about that story that ring true to me. one is the president's impatience. he is not a very patient man, and it's quite likely that a few things occurred that he really found distasteful, and he did say something about getting rid of them. the other part of it that rings true is the scheme, you know, this idea that somehow they were going to make jared and ivanka miserable, and then that would force them to resign. that's also consistent with the way the president operates. but they do have sticking power, but i actually think that the notion that they're moderating where the president is concerned is something the jury is out on. it's an idea that ivanka trump promoted when they were in private business. she often let it be known to
friends and people she respected that, oh, it would be much worse if i weren't there to wield some influence. but haven't noted that donald trump is acting in a moderate way on any issue. we'll never know because we could all say, well, you should see what he really wanted to do. but i don't assume that they're all that powerful. >> according to the book, kate, ivanka and jared didn't initially plan to work at the white house, and once they were there, they clashed with a lot of advisers, a lot of other advisers. but what happened since? >> well, i think quite frankly the tumult in washington led them to actually have to stick to it. i mean we used to hear rumors -- we, the white house press corps, they're moving back to new york. this is it. you know, those rumors were fairly consistent until lately. you know, i think they found some things -- ivanka trump has
found women's economic empowerment to be a special project for her. she's gotten some funding for that in the new budget. she's also taken on work and family leave rights. she's been to congress. she's sort of forged relationships on capitol hill. certainly it took them some time to find the footing, but i think now that they're there and they've seen what the white house is like and what washington can be like as we saw in that clip, ivanka saying she didn't expect sort of the viciousness, the personal attacks. once she's gotten past, that i think they have the idea that they're going to stick it out. certainly the rumors, again, of them leaving, of them packing it up and heading back to new york, whether by, you know, the president's sort of scheming or on their own volition, those things haven't played out. and i think it's, again, jared kushner has the middle east. he has a lot of projects going on. you know, there are flashes of troubled news about security clearances and other investigations and troubles with kushner business, et cetera. but they have found their niche
inside the white house, and it seems to be that they're sticking to it. >> what's the white house saying about this book? we'll talk about that right after this. nooooo... nooooo... nooooo... quick, the quicker picker upper! bounty picks up messes quicker and is 2x more absorbent than the leading ordinary brand. [son loudly clears throat] sigh [mom and dad laugh] bounty, the quicker picker upper.
since you're heading off to dad... i just got a zerowater. but we've always used brita. it's two stage-filter... doesn't compare to zerowater's 5-stage. this meter shows how much stuff, or dissolved solids, gets left behind. our tap water is 220. brita? 110... seriously? but zerowater- let me guess. zero? yup, that's how i know it is the purest-tasting water. i need to find the receipt for that. oh yeah, you do.
we're back with kate bennett, michael d'antonio, and we're talking about the new book that focuses on ivanka trump and jared kushner's rise to power inside the white house. so white house officials have dismissed this book. a spokesman for jared kushner's attorney abbe lowell said this in a statement. he said that every point that ms. ward mentioned in what she called her fact-checking stage was entirely false. it seems she has written a book of fiction rather than any serious attempt to get the facts. correcting everything wrong would take too long and be pointless. i mean this book is not flattering to ivanka and jared, two people who work hard at
controlling their image. will this cause significant damage to the couple or their brand, do you think? >> it's doubtful. you know, the white house sarah sanders also released a statement today calling the book fiction and saying shady anonymous sources. the writer vicky ward actually tweeted today, i'm very proud today to join the long list of journalists disparaged by the white house. so clearly this is another case of the white house dealing with a book being written about what's going on in the west wing. this time it happens to be jared and ivanka. you know, ivanka trump is very interesting. she's her father's daughter. when she finds herself in the midst of potentially bad press, she often takes to twitter to tout the good stuff. this morning she was talking about the strength of the economy. it could have been a tweet from her father the way listing job numbers and wage growth and this weekend on instagram, she instagramed to her several million followers her sort of highlight reel of the past two years. she's very savvy when it comes to keeping herself afloat when the headlines get a little
bumpy, when the story lines get rocky. and of course jared kushner, we don't hear from him a lot anyway. he's not exactly the forward-facing member of the couple. so it's likely he will weather this book for now. but, again, it's the white house facing yet another book about what's happening behind closed doors. >> is that where coming to being a p.r. machine and promoting yourself and changing the subject rather than actual policy and doing the work of the american people? is that wt we've come to? sounds like it. what's she doing there? >> is that to michael? >> kate. >> oh. yeah. i mean i think in a lot of ways, like i said, this is a trump. she is a trump family member. branding is very important. maneuvering, manipulating public image is important. and also quite frankly, ivanka has done things within this administration, you know, tangible pushing the ball forward in the portfolio that she does have, and i think now is the time to talk about those things. and that's just what she's doing. she doesn't do it with the sort
of negative energy that her father does all the time. however, she does share a lot of her progress, her positives on social media, and that's certainly something she must have picked up along the way. >> all right. michael, vicky ward tells how ivanka defended her father when gary cohn was considering resigning after president trump blamed both sides in the white nationalist protests in charlottesville. she said, my dad's not a racist. he didn't mean any of it. appearing on a channel her father, you know -- with her father, she said, that's not what he said. listen, i guess it's no surprise that she'd be supporting her dad. but what does this say about her views on this? >> well, i think that her views are about protecting him and protecting herself. she is a true trump, so she's going to practice public relations. you know, when she talks about how vicious washington is and
how the reception was so difficult, it's because she was profoundly unqualified for the job she was given, and the world knows it. jared kushner is profoundly unqualified. she receives 16 trademarks from the chinese government since she's been in the white house. jared kushner's family is going around the world looking for money. so all of this defensiveness and where her father and racism is concerned, he's said racist things for more than 30 years. so she's been aware of him all his life having problems with the attitudes he shares about various kinds of people. so of course she's going to say he's not a racist, but to lie and say that he didn't say what he actually said, and then to say, well, he doesn't mean it? you know, this is -- this is too much trumpism from the daughter
who would like to distinguish herself. and the last thing that i'd like to offer is that the one tangible thing i know that ivanka trump has done is get a billion dollars added to the federal budget for child care. but the people who run child care at the state and local levels say that the money is directed at something they don't need. it's the wrong direction, and it's not nearly enough money. so she can go around bragging about it, but it's not effective policy, and it's a minuscule amount. >> thank you both. the truth. see you next time. we have some breaking news to tell you about tonight. it is out of california. governor gavin newsom will sign an executive order tomorrow placing a moratorium on the death penalty in that state. that means a reprieve for 737 people on death row in california, which has the largest death row population in the country. the order will immediately close
the execution chamber at san quentin, but it will not alter any current conviction or sentence or lead to the release of any prisoner currently on death row. countries around the world are grounding boeing max 8 planes, but u.s. officials say there's, quote, no basis to ground the planes. why? you enjoying your first ncaa tournament? it's just lovely. i'm here to let all these folks know how easy it is to save money on their car insurance with geico- oi oi oi set the pick! kick it outside!! shoot the three! shoot the three!! yessssssss!!!!!! are you...ok? no, no i'm not. i think i pulled a hammy. could we get some ice? just one cube of ice? geico®. proud partner of ncaa march madness®.
♪ pardon the interruption but this is big! now with t-mobile get the samsung galaxy s10e included with unlimited data for just $40 a month. the faa is resisting calls tonight to ground the 737 max 8. that's after two plane crashes in less than five months killing 346 people. multiple countries around the world have grounded the planes. let's discuss now. former faa inspector david soucie is here. he's the author of malaysia
airlines flight 370. also mary ski avo, an aviation attorney who represents families of airline crash victims and has litigation pending against boeing. good evening to both of you. david, i want you to take a look at the countries that have grounded or canceled the max 8. the faa is saying tonight that there is no basis to order that here. what is your reaction to that? >> all of those countries that you have listed there, don, have one thing in common. they didn't certify this airplane. boeing did. ask they' and they're in the united states, and the faa is the one who certified that airplane to be manufactured. they have skin in the game. >> and that's it? what do you mean by that? tell me what you mean by that. >> well, the faa, they have all the chips on the table. they said, we're certifying this airplane. they're standing behind it. if they admit now that the aircraft had some kind of
certification issue or some problem that they overlooked when they certified the airplane, to ground the airplanes now would be admitting to that. it would be admitting that we did something wrong, and they're not going to want to do that. >> thank you. mary, you said that regulators are essentially betting with their lives of crews and passengers that this won't happen again. explain. >> well, that's right. so what the faa and boeing have said is after the first crash, they said they were going to make changes to the manuals and require classroom training of the pilots, an hour of training. ask then immediately after the ethiopia crash, the faa issued another guidance, another order that said it was going to order boeing to make additional changes to the actual flight computer. but it also added very cautionary, but we don't say this has anything to do with the ethiopia crash. we're just ordering this and boeing has to have this done by april, but we have no idea what
caused ethiopia. so what they're saying is they don't know what caused it. two new planes have made holes in the ground and killed almost 350 people. but they're not going to make changes because they don't know. so they're going to wait, not order changes, and just bet that it doesn't happen again. and that's a very foolish approach to safety. safety should be, we know what's happened, and we can make the change, not, we're not going to make changes because we don't know. >> american airlines, mary, has more than 300 737s. southwest has more than 350 737s. only 34 are max 8s. would it be easy to temporarily ground such a small amount of planes. >> well, i won't say it would be easy, but with fleets like that and the ability to change their fleets and make up for the shortages of the planes, yes, for carriers like that, they could do it. and they have experience in the
past with other instances where they've had to ground. southwest has had maintenance issues where they've had to pull planes under orders. >> so why the resistance, then? >> well, again, i think it's because in the united states, in addition to what david said -- and he's right. but in the united states, the faa defers to boeing, and they defer to the airlines. they have a different approach. in fact, they call the airlines their customers. i thought the traveling public was. and when it comes to boeing, most of the boeing certifications and oversight are performed by designated examiners or persons right within boeing or who work for boeing. and when my old office, office of inspector general, when i was there, we reviewed the certification of the boeing 777. we found that boeing self-certified about 95% of the plane. not saying that was bad, but the fact of the matter is that boeing had the expertise and the faa just won't challenge them.
in the most recent directive, it said, this is based on analysis by boeing. it's right in the order. >> david, the president tweeted this today. he said airplanes are becoming far too complex to fly. pilots are no longer needed but rather computer scientists from m.i.t. i see it all the time in many products. always seeking to go one unnecessary step further when often old and simpler is far better. split second decisions are -- this is followed by a phone call with the president of boeing's ceo, and the white house was later saying this. watch. >> certainly this is very early in the process. i think the first place we have to start is by offering our condolences. >> what's going on here? >> well, i've got a good example for the president of the old style, and the faa must be thinking the same way because right now we fought long and hard to get streaming data from the airplanes that we could look at and analyze online realtime. the adsb does that and we have
information. we have information about the vertical speed that was erratic. it was all over the place. it was exactly -- not exactly, but very similar, frighteningly similar to the prior accident that we had just with lion air. so you look at that, and it's streaming data. it's there. it's right in front of you. but what does the faa do? they say, we don't have any information. we don't have any facts. what we do is we're going to wait until we get the black box out of the dirt, and we're going to take that, and it's going to take a couple weeks to analyze. in the meantime, we could have a lot of airplanes out there with the same problem and not know the difference. here's a case where technology is available. it's advanced. it's there. it's beneficial. it's something that really improves safety, but they're not using it anyway. >> right. >> so maybe that's what the president's referring to. >> david, mary, thank you very much. appreciate your time and your expert he's. thanks for watching, everyone. our coverage continues. when we started our business
shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. openturning 50 opens theuard. door to a lot of new things... like now your doctor may be talking to you about screening for colon cancer. luckily there's me, cologuard. the noninvasive test you use at home. it all starts when your doctor orders me. then it's as easy as get, go, gone. you get me when i'm delivered... right to your front door and in the privacy of your own home. there's no prep or special diet needed. you just go to the bathroom, to collect your sample. after that, i'm gone, shipped to the lab for dna testing that finds colon cancer and precancer.
cologuard is not right for everyone. it is not for high risk individuals, including those with a history of colon cancer or precancer. ibd, certain hereditary cancer syndromes, or a family history of colon cancer. maybe i'll be at your door soon! ask your doctor if cologuard is right for you. covered by medicare and most major insurers.
♪ paul manafort could get ten more years in prison today, or is another life sentence in store for the former trump campaign manager? the u.s. now the only major company where airlines and the government are sticking with the boeing max 8. turns out pilots raised concerns after the first crash in october. celebrities among dozens caught up an unprecedented college admission scandal. an elaborate scheme of cheating, bribing and lying. and overnight, california putting a