tv Anderson Cooper 360 CNN March 19, 2019 9:00pm-10:00pm PDT
n heyth cholesterol naturally, and it's odor-free, and pharmacist recommended. garlique good evening. if you are wondering if the president of the united states apologized today for his attack on a war hero just months after his passing, the answer is he didn't. in fact he continued to express his dislike of john mccain, blaming him for his vote on health care and other unnamed issues. as you know, in the past one of those issues he disliked during the campaign, about mccain was he got captured during the vietnam war, was a p.o.w. for six years and was tortured. mr. trump apparently doesn't like members of the military who get captured. so he said. the continued comments by the president of the united states has also unleashed a flood of attacks by everyday citizens against the mccain family. senator mccain's widow, cindy, posted one such comment she says she received from a woman on facebook messenger. it's a note laced with obscenities which we're sanitizing. "your husband was a traitorous
peace of war-mongering s word," the woman writes. "and i'm glad he's dead. hope your miss piggy-looking daughter chokes to death on the next burger she stuffs down her fat neck too." she concludes with another vile word i'm not going to repeat. cindy mccain posted that after the president lashed out over the weekend on twitter of course from the comfort of the executive -- of executive time at the white house. he took aim at a man who stood up to six years of torture in a north vietnamese prison. he blamed senator mccain for sparking the russia investigation and falsely claimed that he graduated last at annapolis. just keeping them honest, he graduated sixth from last. something the senator himself had the confidence to point out and make fun of himself for. the president also attacked mccain for casting a vote against repealing obamacare saying he caused the repeal to fail. we should point out mccain wasn't the only republican to vote no. today as we noted the president continued to comment on mccain. >> i'm very unhappy that he didn't repeal and replace obamacare as you know. he campaigned on repealing and replacing obamacare for years
and then he got to a vote and he said thumbs down. and our country would have saved a trillion dollars and we would have had great health care. so he campaigned. he told us hours before that he was going to repeal and replace. and then for some reason, i think i understand the reason, he ended up going thumbs up. frankly, had we known that, we would have gotten the vote. because we could have gotten somebody else. so i think that's disgraceful. plus, there are other things. i was never a fan of john mccain and i never will be. >> you don't have to be a fan to respect their memory or just recognize their undeniable service to the country. you don't have to be a very stable genius to understand that your words and deeds have consequences. they can inspire or incite, which is why presumably cindy mccain made public today that vile message attacking her late husband and their family. late today republican senator mitt romney weighed in tweeting "i can't understand why the president would once again disparage a man as exemplary as my friend john mccain. heroic, courageous, patriotic, honorable, self-effacing,
self-sacrificing, empathetic and driven by duty to family, country, and god." just moments ago cnn's jim acosta got new information on the roots of the president's grievance over senator mccain's obamacare vote. he joins us now. what have you learned about the president's claims about senator mccain today? >> reporter: well, anderson, i talked to a former mccain aide who worked with the senator right up until his death and was around for when this repeal and replace vote went down. when john mccain gave that now face thumbs down to the gop repeal and replace plan and angered the white house, angered the president. you heard the president talking about that today. in the words of this aide, nope, never happened, he was not one to consult the white house before he acted. and then this aide added the question you're surprised, you're surprised that trump lied? this aide added. and so they, inside mccain world, they are obviously furious with the way the president has been behaving over the last few days, going after
john mccain. but this is just a factual error according to people who worked for the late senator. >> has the white house had anything to say about what cindy mccain posted today? >> reporter: no, they haven't. i think it is worth reminding folks, anderson, this is the sort of thing that happens all the time. when the president lashes out at any number of targets. you and i know this, probably as well as a lot of people do. you do take on a barrage of social media attacks from the president's supporters, there is just a whole legion of trolls and bots and so on to back up what the president says, and sometimes those messages get very, very sinister and sometimes violent. i think this is just a taste of what the mccain family i guess has gone through. but as for mccain's status as a war hero, you mentioned what mitt romney said just a few moments ago, anderson, we should point out, president trump has been to vietnam twice now. i've traveled with president trump in his first two years in office to hanoi twice. on both of those occasions the
president has been right down the street from the hanoi hilton. he has elected, he has chosen not to go to that former prison to see the bravery of john mccain firsthand. jurmts who travel with the president go to the hanoi hilton all the time and see it for themselves. it would not have been a big stretch for the secret service or for the white house staff to arrange a trip for the president to the hanoi hilton so he could see what senator mccain's bravery is all about. it's just something that the president doesn't want to do because he wants to continue to nurse this grudge against the late senator. >> obviously, hanoi hilton, you know, an ironic name. anything but a hilton of course. prison for p.o.w.s. jim acosta. perspective for a man who's had plenty to say about the president, leadership, retired army colonel ralph peters. >> colonel peters, it would have been very easy for the president to just say no comment today. but he can't help himself from once again attacking john
mccain, who's both a war hero and deceased. >> well, i think it's very straightforward, anderson. john mccain was and in our heart remains the man trump could never be. and trump knows it. it's a classic case of male fears of inadequacy. it goes along perfectly with his lifelong obsession with having women on his arm that look like teenage boys' fantasies. he wants to show us all how tough he is. but he's not tough. he's a draft dodger. and he appears to be a physical coward with a big mouth. >> it seems to me the people who are actually tough, who have actually been in tough situations and shown themselves and have risen to those situations to meet them, they don't talk tough necessarily. they often are the quietest person in the room. >> yeah. indeed. it's just an old rule.
the guy who brags at the bar wasn't a hero. myself, i've been privileged to know some men and women whom i regard as genuine heroes. and john mccain, who i knew slightly as well. and no, they don't shoot off their mouths. they don't gratuitously ll lly people. they don't incite hatred. on the contrary. the people who've actually served this country so well, with john mccain as his generation's leading example, they don't -- they just don't behave like trump. >> it's interesting because i used to think, or at times i thought, okay, there's a political reason for the president to be doing something or for tweeting something or trying to change the message, r. focus people onto something else that distracts from something, something going on that's negative to the president or that he doesn't like. mike shields, who's a supporter of the president's, was on the
program last night saying that some people might actually see this as strength from the president, that he's sticking to his guns, that he's not pretending to like somebody who he didn't like in life, and that you know, it's him not backing down, just because senator mccain has passed away. that it's actually a sign of strength to some people. >> does one really need to reply to anything that preposterous? look, trump is just shameful. he is obscene. he is disgraceful. i mean, pick your adjective. but anyone who -- again, who dodged the draft, who never did anything for this country and who was elected apparently with the help of a hostile power, that this guy would attack and keep attacking john mccain just shows you the power of human jealousy. i mean, jealousy -- here in washington everybody's afraid of human emotion.
we never talk about something like jealousy being a strategic factor. yet if there is a quality, an emotion that will ruin lives and start wars, it is jealousy. and trump appears to me to be consumed by it. because for all the doodads he's got and now he's got air force one to replace his older plane, all the toys he has, he does not seem like a happy man. he seems terribly lonely. just roaming the halls of the white house at night living, living for television. this man's the president of the united states. and the best he can do with his time is watch fox news and tweet? i mean, future historians, future citizens are going to look back at this interval in our history and be utterly appalled and disgusted because i'll tell you, as an intelligence officer i was a really good analyst. i had an incredible track
record. i could never foresee the american people electing someone like donald trump. >> i'm just wondering, it's a little off topic but i was curious when this happened to get your take on it. when the president talked about having the military and the police and construction workers and bikers on his side and that they're tough people and, you know, that they're peaceful and he hopes they stay that way but it would get really bad if they didn didn't, i was surprised by that. i don't know of other ways to look at it other than he's saying he has armed forces on his side, he's saying he has the police. that seems to be the kind of message you would hear from some dictator in some other country, from some wannabe strongman. >> when i heard that, i was infuriated. on multiple levels. first, what an insult to our military, particularly to the officer corps.
we have never had a coup or the threat of a coup in this country. our officer corps and our military is loyal not to some midtown mussolini, but they take an oath to the constitution of the united states. and as long as the elected president of the united states gives lawful orders, our military will obey those orders whether they like them or not. but should any president give unlawful orders, orders that couldn't ravine the constitution, the military will say no. i mean, you might get a couple crazies. but the military is loyal to the constitution, not to an individual. i'm sure that's the same with the overwhelming number of police departments and others. now, some biker gangs. will he have some biker gangs on his side? he might. i don't really think they're going it overthrow the country. but anderson, whether or not collusion is a crime, sedition is. and if on his way out the door, whenever that may be, trump incites people to violence and
people die, well, you know, the mob boss is an accessory to murder. it's not just the hitman down on the streets. and deadly sedition, i mean, that is incon trofrtably a criminal offense and it doesn't take a powerful cnn lawyer to tell you that. >> colonel peters, thank you very much for being with us. appreciate it. >> thank you. digging deeper now is cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin, also former trump white house attorney jim schultz. jim, is there a strategy to what the president is doing, continuing this, you know, attack on john mccain, who's dead? >> i don't think there's a strategy associated. i think he was reacting to the news of the steele dossier and mccain, turning over -- turning over the steele dossier. i think it was a reactionary and quite frankly -- >> by the way, he's not being accurate about what that report said, which we've known all along, was that mccain turned it
over to the fbi, an associate of mccain's gave it to at least one reporter, maybe more. the president's saying it was mccain who gave it to the media. so i mean, just specifically -- >> he's reacting to a report, so he's -- and lashing out. and quite frankly he can find other things to talk about. he's got a great track record, great performance as president of this country in terms of the jobs, the economy, the trade -- >> but he doesn't tweet about that. >> he can talk about a ton of other things and this is something he didn't need to tweet about and quite frankly i think was an unforced error strategically because john mccain did have his fair shake of supporters although certainly not very popular politically among the president's base, but i think a lot of folks -- most people in this country including myself respect the sacrifice that john mccain made. even though you might not agree with his politics. >> yeah. jeff, does it -- i'm wondering how you see this. does it make sense to you he's continuing this? he was asked a question today but he could have very easily
said you all know what my thoughts are, i'm just going to move on. >> you know, i'm a lawyer, not a doctor. but i mean, the psychological problem -- phenomenon of projection is so evident in everything donald trump does, that he dodged the draft, so he has to disparage a war hero. you know, he -- who knows how he did in school. so he has to pretend that barack obama did poorly in school. at the same time as we learn that michael cohen was threatening his schools about releasing donald trump's transcripts. and you know, the thing that i think is most sad about all this is that not so much donald trump's character, which i think is very clear, is that a lot of people in our country are the same way. that the bigotry of donald trump, that on the day after 50 people, muslims are killed in
new zealand, he devotes tweet after tweet to defending jeanine pir pirro, who's an anti-muslim bigot. that's popular with a lot of people. that's the real scandal here. you know, donald trump's personality is what it is. but i think the really hard question we have to address is why do so many people in this country feel exactly the same way? >> jim, do you have thoughts on that? because i mean, it is clear, cindy mccain one of the messages she says she's received, and certainly when the president of the united states kind of opens the floodgates himself in terms of his emotions and vitriol it does sort of breed it in others and give license to others. >> yeah, i get that. but let's face it, anderson, you and i -- you go on tv every day, i go on tv every once in a while. the moment we go on tv there's someone attacking us, sometimes personally, sometimes violently on twitter. it happens on a regular basis. and certainly whenever the
president speekz peopaks people agree with his his position or go one step further are going to make negative comments on twitter. no question about it. >> but he's retweeting it to the family members of john mccain. i think he retweeted something to cindy -- to meghan mccain the other day. the idea that he is going through his own feed, i assume it's him, and finding, you know, tweets that agree with him and -- isn't that just for the president to spend his time doing that weird? >> there are better battles to choose. no question. and i think he should choose better battles going forward on his agenda and some of the folks coming at him from congress. certainly that's fair game as it relates to members of congress that are coming after him in a partisan way to punch back. and his base expects him to punch back. but in this instance i think he
could have picked a different fight certainly. >> you know, to pretend that anything on these twitter wars is about the good economy or, you know, trade issues with china, this is about racism and it's about bigotry and it's about discrimination, and people like that about trump. and that's what i think we have to -- we have to think about in a really hard way. it's not about the economy. >> you think he's opening the vein of that in this country. >> absolutely. that's why he won the election. i mean, you know, that's who he is. donald trump is famous, the only reason donald trump is a politician at all is because he made up a racist lie about barack obama not being born in the united states. you know, that's sort of fallen into the memory bank. that's why donald trump became a political figure. because he made up this racist lie and used it to become a political figure and it worked. and he won.
and that's what's really significant i think. >> jeffrey, what we can agree on here, we see time and time again, we saw the whole issue where the democrats twisted themselves on some anti-semitic comments that were made by members of their caucus. and they twisted themselves trying to deal with that issue. i mean, it's something that needs to be taken head on, no question about it. and i think everybody has to take -- the president, congress, and others, you know, the leaders of this country have to understand that there are consequences for what they say. and it's on both sides. i wouldn't -- you're quick to point out that it's the president. but there are others involved in this kind of political twitter battle that causes this vitriol. maybe we've got to tone it down a little bit. >> i spent 2016 covering a campaign where i personally engaged in false equivalence between hillary clinton's misdeeds and donald trump's misdeeds. and i'm not doing it in 2020. and the idea that one
congressman's -- congresswoman's, you know, silly statement is at all equivalent to the racist and bigoted tirades of the president of the united states is absurd false equivalence. >> we're going to have to leave it there. jeff toobin, jim schultz, appreciate it. we've got breaking news next in the russia investigation. leading figures' role in it. what we're learning from a massive new release of documents in the michael cohen case and what it could say about a case against president. later, trump critic george conway, who's now questioning the president's mental health and who continues to obviously be married to kellyanne conway, one of the president's top advisers and leading defenders. some new developments in the war of words ahead. allergies with sinus congestion and pressure? you won't find relief here. go to the pharmacy counter for powerful claritin-d. while the leading allergy spray only relieves 6 symptoms,
claritin-d relieves 8, including sinus congestion and pressure. claritin-d relieves more. when it comes to reducing the evsugar in your family's diet,m. coke, dr pepper and pepsi hear you. we're working together to do just that. bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance. because we know mom wants what's best. more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar. balanceus.org
hi. maria ramirez! mom! maria! maria ramirez... mcdonald's is committing 150 million dollars in tuition assistance, education, and career advising programs... prof: maria ramirez mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! to help more employees achieve their dreams. with expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. so even when she grows up, she'll never outgrow the memory of our adventure. unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. only with expedia.
♪ you better get moving ♪ ready or not ♪ it's about to go down here it comes now ♪ ♪ get ready ♪ oh oh oh oh ♪ oh oh oh oh ♪ get ready ♪ moving ♪ ready or not ♪ get ready ♪ oh oh oh oh oh ♪ hey mimini was born extraordinary, with more power for more fun. mini was born to do the only thing we ever wanted to do. drive. to hit start and just go. fast and far. around town and around hairpins. to leave everyone in the dust, and leave rubber on the road. because mini was born to drive. drive for yourself at the mini born to drive sales event. special offers at your local mini dealer. breaking news tonight in the russian investigation.
a source familiar with the matter telling cnn the deputy attorney general rod rosenstein intends to stay on until robert mueller makes his report. our source saying that rosenstein sees him as the, quote, heat shield, unquote, someone that can take any hits that may be coming when the report comes out. news came at the end of a day that saw some relate in the michael cohen case, the release of documents relating to the search warrants for the raids that at the time the president obviously was very upset about. cnn's shimon prokupecz joins us now with the latest on both those stories. what are you learning about why ros rosenstein is staying at the doj? what does it mean to be a heat shield? >> certainly he wanted to make sure the incoming deputy attorney general and the now attorney general bill barr kind of would have a clean slate, that is, they would come in, they wouldn't really have to deal with any of let's say the punches that are thrown at them because of the mueller report or any political issues that are a result of it. rod rosenstein was there from the beginning. he really is the person that was responsible for appointing the
special counsel. because you'll remember that jeff sessions recused himself and then comey gets fired and then this whole thing ensues where they decided they need a special counsel to take over this investigation p and it was ultimately rod rosenstein who made that decision. so in order to sort of see this thing through rod rosenstein for whatever reason is staying it's clear that things are perhaps not wrapping up as quickly as we all thought and that look, this could come at any day, but for now rod rosenstein, which he always had intended, he always wanted to stay this see this through, he kept delaying his leaving the department of justice and now it just seems that that's continuing, we really don't know when the special counsel will finally deliver the report to the department of justice. once that happens, we certainly expect for rod rosenstein to leave shortly thereafter. >> just for clarification, the source, are they using the term heat shield of their own or is that a phrase that rosenstein
himself has used? do we know? >> that was a phrase that was told to my colleague pamela brown in a source close to rod rosenstein who said that to her essentially saying that he, rod rosenstein, wants to take the punches, if there are any punches as a result of the report, it could be a while before the entire thing is made public. so who knows what will happen? but certainly i think everyone expects there to be some political fallout once this thing gets landed on the attorney general's desk. >> in terms of the release of the michael cohen raid documents today what's the headline from that? what did we learn from it? >> i think one of the things we really saw for the first time is the mueller team started looking at michael cohen just months after robert mueller was appointed. about two months or so after that they started getting search warrants for his e-mails, other information, subpoenas that they were issuing to really get an understanding of what was going on with michael cohen, his business interests, whether or not he was making money off of
foreign countries, whether or not he was doing any work for foreign countries and not reporting it. and that essentially is what started all of this. it is then all of that information and plus other information that the mueller team and the fbi learned. that is after then is when they send everything to the southern district of new york where obviously the campaign finance laws were investigated. >> and everything about the campaign finance violations, that was redacted? >> it was. and that's significant, anderson, because what it tells us is that a lot of that is still under investigation. there's about 20 pages in the search warrant affidavits that are completely blacked out, where we can't even read anything on them, which indicates that there are still portions of that investigation that are ongoing and that we could see more people being charged in connection with the campaign finance laws. as you know, the president, donald trump, was implicated by michael cohen, by the department of justice in that crime. michael cohen has said that he
was directed by donald trump to make those payments. there are other people in the trump organization that perhaps are facing some scrutiny. so that tells us that that very much is still under investigation. >> shimon, appreciate it. shimon prokupecz. joining us is democratic senator richard blumenthal, member of the judiciary committee. so if the idea of rod rosenstein staying is to be a quote unquote heat shield as this source has said, who is he staying to be a heat shield for? >> well, robert mueller is a prosecutor with vast experience in very heated prosecutions. and so he's pretty combat tested. the idea that he needs a buffer or a heat shield is somewhat surprising. but the fact is politically he needs some backup. and i will tell you, members of congress will have his back. if the president goes after him. as is likely to happen. we've seen what the president did when the offices of his
lawyer michael cohen were raided. we've seen some of his remarks about resisting the prosecution. there is a credible case of obstruction of justice right now, a powerfully credible case against donald trump. and he is clearly feeling the heat himself. >> and in terms of the michael cohen court documents, the idea that special counsel mueller zeroed in on michael cohen and started investigating michael cohen much earlier than anyone realized is interesting. >> not only interesting but profoundly significant. that document, more than 800 pages long, contains a wealth of detail, factual precision, that was collected by this prosecutor in just two months and is only part of what he knows at that point, which is almost two years ago. so think of how much he knows now. i've said all along we know only a fraction of what robert
mueller knows. >> if there's 800 pages of documents from two years ago and mueller does actually write out a report, there's no -- i mean, it will be interesting to see if we can learn how long that report actually is. >> the report hopefully will be long enough to contain the incriminating information that he has gathered about donald trump. not accidentally, dnonald trump was named in effect as an unindicted co-conspirator in the prosecution of cohen. and the reasons for his becoming individual number one, he's not named by actual name but by clear reference as individual number 1. >> but if he's not going to be prosecuted for a crime, isn't it entirely possible that robert mueller would not go into detail? i mean, if the person's not actually being charged with a crime. it was one of the criticisms of comey's press conference about
hillary clinton. >> that's one of the reasons for transparency. if he's not guilty of a crime the facts have to be presented. that's why i offered a bill with senator grassley now joined by another republican, another democrat, that would require a report with those factual findings and evidence that includes all of the facts that implicate donald trump. the public has a right to know. and if he's not going to be indicted, because the justice department policies, they're not rules, they're not regulations, prevent it, and if mueller is not going to present in the report the facts that he knows that are relevant to the potential criminal charges, there is a right on the public to know. and i think that robert mueller has that obligation and the attorney general has the obligation to make it public. >> if -- and obviously, if that doesn't happen you would want to see -- we also have reporting that the white house wants to
review those documents before they're -- whatever is handed over to congress to look for executive privilege. you're fully prepared, the democrats are fully prepared to challenge each case? >> we will challenge it. i think that document will be subpoenaed. there is no legitimate claim to executive privilege here. >> none? >> there is nothing in the regulations that justifies the president of the united states concealing criminality in the name of candid discussions with his advisers on policy. we're talking here about an effort to hide criminality, obstruct justice in the name of executive privilege, and the purpose of executive privilege is to enable candid discussions about policy among his advisers. so i see nothing in those regulations that would justify a broad claim of -- >> but if it's not found to be obstruction of justice by mueller, then you can't really
make an obstruction of justice argument to stop executive privilege from being claimed, no? >> i think the claim of the white house to review this report should not be upheld. the department of justice has a claim to review the report. the white house does not. and the department of justice should not kowtow to the white house. and after all, the president has his lawyers. not even his white house counsel. potentially reviewing it to protect him, not to enable the public to know. >> and it's not the job of his lawyers to declare privilege. it's the white house. >> exactly. >> senator blumenthal, thank you. appreciate it. >> thank you. the president, as you know, has gone after democrats claiming they're anti-semitic. he has not comment on the racially charged remarks republican congressman steve king has said of course. the iowa republican's now caught up in a new controversy and a reporter caught up with him to get some answers. that ahead. ooks like george hava busy day.
♪ the beat goes on george has entresto, a heart failure medicine that helps his heart... so he can keep on doing what he loves. in the largest heart failure study ever, entresto was proven superior at helping people stay alive and out of the hospital. it helps improve your heart's ability to pump blood to the body. don't take entresto if pregnant; it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren, or if you've had angioedema with an ace or arb. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high blood potassium. ♪ the beat goes on ask your doctor about entresto for heart failure. that was great! entrust your heart to entresto. ♪ the beat goes on aww. yaaaayyy!!! aww.
yaaaayyy!!! aww. yaaaayyy!!! we hide hotel names, so you can find four star hotels at two star prices. ♪ h-o-t-w-i-r-e ♪hotwire.com the big drug companies don't see they see us as profits. we're paying the highest prescription drug prices in the world so they can make billions? americans shouldn't have to choose between buying medication and buying food for our families. it's time for someone to look out for us. congress, stop the greed. cut drug prices now. smile dad. i take medication for high blood pressure and cholesterol. but they might not be enough to protect my heart. adding bayer aspirin can further reduce the risk of another heart attack. because my second chance matters. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen.
this is beyond wifi, this is xfi. simple. easy. awesome. xfinity, the future of awesome. i can worry about it, or doe. something about it. garlique helps maintain healthy cholesterol naturally, and it's odor-free, and pharmacist recommended. garlique if you were stripped of your committee assignments over a defense of white supremacy it might be a good idea to lay low and watch what you say for a while and what you post, but congressman steve king is doing neither. the iowa republican shared a meme on facebook that alludes to a new civil war that red states would apparently win because that side has, quote, 8 trillion bullets while the blue states "don't know which bathrooms to use." it's been taken down but not a far cry from that warning president trump issued the other
day saying his supporters could "get tough on the left if things reached a certain point and it would be very bad," saying he had the military and police on his side as well as bikers and construction workers. cnn's gary tuchman just caught up with congressman king in his home state and had a chance to ask him about his latest controversy. >> please join me in welcoming 4th district congressman steve king. >> reporter: republican congressman steve king meeting with constituents in the small iowa town of algonna. and almost making it through the hour and a quarter town hall without being asked about the meme on his facebook site that boasts red states would win a civil war against blue states. reporters not invited to ask questions. but we did. >> congressman, before you say your good-byes i just want to give you a chance to explain the posting on facebook which talked about red states having 8 trillion bullets in case of another civil war. which -- >> i think it's interesting that nobody here has that question. >> can you explain why -- >> if there's anybody here that
was interested in that question it was this. i found out about it being posted yesterday morning at the same time and i thought had been taken down about 8:30. it wasn't until a few hours later. the only people that care about that are national news media. nobody has raised the issue around here. >> you posted it, sir. why did you post it? >> i've answered your question. we wouldn't take any questions from press. i answered your question. >> we do care about it. >> then i've answered the question. >> reporter: indeed some constituents did want a further explanation from their congressman. >> do you look at that page? >> i found out that that was posted yesterday morning. and i don't manage that -- >> that's not you personally? >> i'll say it again. i don't manage that facebook page. i could control it but i don't manage it. so i wasn't aware that that was posted until yesterday morning. and i was also under the understanding it had been taken down right away. it wasn't. i wish it had never gone up. >> reporter: most of the people at the town hall were strong supporters of king and don't think it's fair he's been under
so much scrutiny for allegations of racism in the past. >> you got beaten up pretty hard by the -- by the media. and i just was wondering what your take on that was. >> reporter: but some of his constituents are troubled. and this woman got a strange answer to her question. >> do you think a white society is superior to a non-white? >> i don't have an answer for that. that's so hypothetical. >> reporter: but then this answer. >> america is not a white society. it's never been a completely white society. we came here and joined the native americans that were here in many times, the numbers greater than ours. i've long said that a baby could be lifted out of a cradle anywhere in the world and brought into any home in america, whatever the color of the folks in that household, and they can be raised to be as american as any other. >> reporter: as he was leaving i asked congressman king the exact question president trump was asked following the mosque massacres in new zealand. >> do you see white nationalism as a rising threat throughout the world? >> i didn't hear that come up in this state at all. >> reporter: president trump was asked that.
didn't say it specifically. >> i'm going to -- i'm going to just head out and leave that be. >> gary tuchman joins me now. gary, did the congressman say who did post the new civil war meme on his facebook page? >> reporter: well, it's interesting, anderson. because it appears congressman king threw someone under the bus, someone he knows pretty well, but he did not tell us who he threw under the bus. it's important to point out in this day and age of social media if you put your name on a site and you approve of the site then generally you're responsible for the site. the congressman did tell us that he does write his own tweets. he doesn't have a ghost twitterer. anderson? >> gary tuchman, thanks very much. i want to continuity conversation with cnn political commentator tara setmayer and cornell william brooks, former naacp president and ceo. there's a lot certainly to unpack from gary's story. putting aside the fact that iowa's part of the union.
i'm just wondering what you make of what you heard from congressman king, the idea that he didn't know about this, and removed it as soon as he did. >> well, let's just take note of this. if this were some isolated incident, it might be one thing. it might be some error made by his staff. but where you have a congressman with a long sordid ugly history of bigoted tweets and retweets and memes this is not aberrational. it is not isolated but a part of a continuing pattern. and so the congressman is acting like a 21st century wannabe confederate, romanticizing the past in order to divide the president. i'd like to remind the congressman that in iowa no less than 3,000 iowans lost their lives in the civil war on the side of the union. that is to say the side of lincoln, the side of those that
supported the eventual freeing of 4 million slaves. so the congressman needs to be aware of american history and certainly the history of iowans. it's an ugly tweet and part of an ugly pattern. >> certainly, tara, also not only in the wake of the congressman's prior comments and long history of comments but even of the president's comments about, you know, having the armed forces, having the police on his side and that things could get very ugly this whole idea of a civil war, i mean, it's -- i don't know if it's bizarre or scary or however one wants to view it. it just seems odd that a congressman would have this on his facebook page. >> it's all of the above, anderson. to be honest with you, i never thought i would actually be concerned that a possible civil war would happen in this country. i've said it before. i'm worried about the peaceful transition of power in the next
election. donald trump, that tweet that you just referenced where he talked about the bikers for trump and he's got the military and everybody and be careful if something happens, like that is insane. what is he inciting? and it's not the first time. he's poking at these kinds of really ugly, dangerous sentiments that we haven't seen in this country in a very long time. and steve king then turning around and allowing something like that on his facebook page, whether he posted it or not, the way he's handled this is not acceptable. it's not. and you know, i worked on capitol hill. i was a coms director. and we had certain people that controlled the congressmen's social media. but you knew who that was. and if it was someone -- did he fire the staffer who did that if it wasn't him? it just seems to him it was a cowardly response. and it's terribly irresponsible. to even imply something like that with bullets and a civil war and then have like a happy face about i wonder who would
win. this isn't a joke. we just saw people slaughtered in new zealand. we just had people slaughtered at a synagogue a couple months ago in this country in pittsburgh. you know, charlottesville. this is real. and i have to say that i'm really disappointed in steve king. i know congressman king. i worked with him when i worked for congressman rohrabacher. steve king and i were buddies. when i would go to iowa, steve king was the nicest, gracious host to me. that was many years ago. the steve king today, i don't know who that is. and i'm really, really disappointed in him. and you know, he deserves to lose his committee chairmanship. and he's drown a primary opponent out there in iowa and hopefully the people of iowa had enough of this. shameful, steve king. what are you doing? >> cornell, it's interesting. it would be one thing if in the wake of this -- all right, it was a mistake, someone else, assuming he's telling the truth there and someone else posted it. at that town hall when, you know, gary asked the question and then turns out there were people in the audience who were concerned about it and followed
up with it. he could have said more than just, you know, i wasn't happy it was posted, i took it down. no one, it seems, today kind of tries to explain why they're unhappy it was posted. he could have said i don't believe there should be a civil war, i don't want there to be a civil war in this country. the idea that we would be pitting americans against each other is a terrible idea. >> that's right. >> anything like that. but it's not. it's just i didn't want that posted. >> that's right. the congress manuel is not taking responsibility for his rhetoric, for his tweets or his retweets. let's keep in mind when all this is happening. when we have over this past weekend a jewish cemetery desecrated. where we have in new zealand people slaughtered. where we have a hate crime rate in this country which has gone up three years in a row. literally, muslims, jews, african-americans, latinos, you
pick the group, trans folk, gay folk, everybody -- i should say so many people who are part of this republic of being otherwise and excluded as a consequence of this rhetoric. so in this moment he declines to take responsibility. in this moment he declines to speak to all iowans and all americans by saying, you know, that he has nothing to do with that kind -- that ideology of white nationalism. because we've got to be clear about this. this tweet was about using transphobia to legitimize white nationalism. okay? and using bathrooms as a way of literally spitting on the grave of people who laid down their lives so that eventually 4 million slaves might be freed. that's what this is about. and so this congressman needs to be called out. we need to be very clear about this. we may have been a well-mannered racist but he is no less a racist. >> cornell william brooks.
appreciate you being on. tara setmayer as well. thank you. president trump now publicly attacking the husband of one of his chief aides, kellyanne conway. if we thought things con get any weirder, they have. we'll tell you about it next. some things are out of your control. like bedhead. hmmmm. ♪ rub-a-dub ducky... and then...there's national car rental. at national, i'm in total control. i can just skip the counter and choose any car in the aisle i like. so i can rent fast without getting a hair out of place. heeeeey. hey! ah, control. (vo) go national. go like a pro. ♪ ♪
book now and enjoy free unlimited open bar and more. norwegian cruise line. feel free. i've done all sorts of research, read earnings reports, looked at chart patterns. i've even built my own historic trading model. and you're still not sure if you want to make the trade? exactly. sounds like a case of analysis paralysis. is there a cure? td ameritrade's trade desk. they can help gut check your strategies and answer all your toughest questions. sounds perfect. see, your stress level was here and i got you down to here, i've done my job. call for a strategy gut check with td ameritrade. ♪ ♪ pardon the interruption but this is big! now with t-mobile get the samsung galaxy s10e included with unlimited data for just $40 a month. but i'm more than a number. when i'm not sharing ideas with my colleagues
i'm defending my kingdom. my essilor lenses offer more than vision correction with three innovative technologies for my ultimate in vision clarity and protection together in a single lens: the essilor ultimate lens package. so, i can do more of what i love! buy two pairs of essilor's best lenses and get a $100 back instantly. see more. do more. essilor
the husband and white house aid has been taking digs at president trump over twitter since he took office. mr. conway tweeted out a definition of narcissistic personality disorder implying the president has shown many of those symptoms. today he shot back retweeting remarks by his 2020 campaign manager that wrote we all know that donald trump turned down mr. kellyanne conway for a job he wanted. he barely worked at the justice department and was either fired, quit, didn't want the scrutiny and now he hurts his wife because she's jealous of her success. potus didn't know him. the president wrote, a total loser. conway posted this -- congratulations you just guaranteed millions of more people will learn about narcissistic personality disorder and narcissism. great job. i think i still said it wrong. mr. conway rarely talks about this but he did today to the washington post.
so what did george conway tell you about his verbal attacks on the president and twitter and why he chooses to wage them so publicly. >> well, george conway, his answer was interesting to me. he says he does it so he doesn't scream at his wife. i tweet for 15 to 20 minutes in the morning it allows me to go on about my day and gets it off my chest and allows me to focus on other things. there's been a growing following. an exponential following of him now and that's attractive to him as well to have a larger sway on social media and his opinions. what he said today is a lot of it is just about a stress relief to some degree. >> the notion that the president doesn't even know george conway is certainly not true. not that we should be surprised but it's not true. >> right. he met the president dating back to 2006 where he helped the president on a condo board
dispute in manhattan and secured a letter from the president thanking him for what a good lawyer he was. in 2016, he attended a fund-raiser with the president. he gave him legal advice on who he should hire for the mueller probe. he has gone to parties with the president. he's met with the president's team. there's a number of occasions that show that the two men know each other. they were never personal friends but they have a relationship and have known each other for many years. >> you also report on a british embassy party that kellyanne attended last month. what happened there? >> she was talking with "the new york times" columnist, andrea mitchell, the nbc reporter and sally quinn a former journalist at "the washington post" and went on a rant about her husband. she said the media should stop giving him attention. that she was jealous of her success and the president also thought he was jealous of her success. the people in the media would
not want their private lives scrutinized. and frustrations over her marriage and particularly what her husband says publicly. it was a pretty striking scene. >> she's right. no one wants their personal lives scrutinized but this is just a bizarre situation. she is a top adviser to the president of the united states. he is publicly calling the man his wife is working for unstable and the president is now attacking his top adviser's husband. i guess -- does she stay in the job? did conway talk about the -- i don't want to ask about the state of their marriage but i find the situation very strange. especially with the president attacking his adviser's husband. does she stay in the job? did conway talk about the -- i don't want to ask about the state of their marriage. i find this situation very strange, especially with the president attacking his
adviser's husband. >> right. she has shown no signs of wanting to leave the job. she's been prominent adviser. even more prominent recently. done several interviews defending the president. she's been one of his most valuable supportive defenders and the president loves her for that. one of george conway's frustrations he said to me in the interview was that she wouldn't leave the job and he's tried to get her to repeatedly. without luck. i don't want to get into the contents of someone's marriage. it's not for me to analyze but i will say that's two parallels. the president weighing in on the spouse of a top adviser. the only parallel is martha mitchell that was a wife of richard nixon, one of his top advisers that helped precipitate watergate in nixon's eyes. for the most part, this doesn't happen publicly. can you imagine george bush weighing in on carl rhodes spouse or president obama on david axlerods. it's not normal but it's not without precedent either.