tv CNN Newsroom With Ana Cabrera CNN March 23, 2019 12:00pm-1:00pm PDT
. i want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm ana cabrera in new york. right to the breaking news this hour. the fight to see the full report from robert mueller kicking into overdrive. house democrats are holding a conference call right now to strategize. they're not satisfied that attorney general william barr may only give them the principal conclusion, basically a summary of possible collusion between the trump campaign and russia. democrats and many americans want all of it. whatever it is. now, the attorney general is at the justice department right now pouring over and continuing to review mueller's report. d.o.j. officials tell us it is comprehensive. but as of right now, no one outside the justice department knows what is in it, how long it is or how much it deals with the president's own accuracies. here is what we do know. mueller ended his investigation yesterday without further indictments, and without ever doing a sit-down interview with the president. so remember this moment, because
no matter what this report actually says, when we look back at the trump presidency, we'll likely draw a line, before the mueller report, and after, and the before was about a report of almost mythical proportions, built up over 675 days, where the country wondered would it solve all of the mysteries of russian election interference and collusion? would it damn a sitting president or exonerate him? so far, the after has brought more questions. and the hard reality that we may not get all of the answers. we have reports at the justice department at the justice department, at mar-a-lago and capitol hill. and we begin with cnn's manu raju. democrats are holding this conference call right now. i will be speaking to a prominent democratic lawmaker as soon as he is off that call but what can you tell us about what they're hoping to accomplish? >> there is a lot of anxiety among the democratic caucus right now about what is in the mueller report and what
democrats want to do in the days ahead to put the pressure on the justice department to get what they want. and what they want is a public release of the full report, as well as the underlying evidence, the findings in the report, and the decisions about, that led, the findings that led to the decisions by robert mueller to prosecute and to not prosecute, that would call for hearings, including unclassified hearings, with robert mueller, other senior officials, to make clear that the american public understands exactly what happened, over the past 675 days. now, speaker nancy pelosi sent a letter just moments ago, to her caucus, making it very clear that she expects and expects her caucus to push very aggressively for the full mueller report. she said this. she said even if d.o.j. chooses not to prosecute additional individuals, the underlying findings must be provided to congress, and the american people. the attorney general's offer to provide the committees with a summary of the report's conclusions is insufficient. congress requires a full report
and the underlying documents, so that committees can proceed with their independent work, including oversight and legislating, to address any issues the mueller report may raise. so ana, we expect in this call that is happening right now, that the members who chair the key committee, jerry nadler, the chairman of the house judiciary committee and adam schiff, the head of the house intelligence committee will brief members and so far it is very little. they have only been told they could get briefed as soon as this weekend about the principal conclusions and what what to expect going forward, but a lot of questions. we'll see how the members answer the private calls that is happening right now. >> as the report is done, there are still multiple investigations into the president and his inner circle going on in the house. and today we learned the president's son-in-law and senior adviser jared kushner has agreed to hand over documents in the obstruction probe. give us an update on that. >> that's the house judiciary committee's investigation that is looking into a lot of aspects that bob mueller has looked into as well, potential obstruction
of justice, potential abuse of power, as well as things that are occurring during the russian interference campaign, back in 2016. jared kushner is one of the 81 individuals and entities that have been targeted by this committee, to provide documents to the committee. now we have learned from a source familiar with the matter that kushner in fact, is providing documents related to the questions that jerry nadler has, he has asked questions about russian interference, the trump tower moscow project, the firing of james comey, as well as the hush money payments that occurred back in 2016 to silence those alleged affairs, involving the president. how kushner responds to those remains to be seen. but yes, ana, a sign that these investigations on the hill only are just beginning, with one major one coming to an end. >> they're not going anywhere. manu raju on capitol hill, keep us posted for any new developments there. i want to go to cnn justice department jessica schneider now. all eyes are on attorney general william barr. we spotted him leaving his home earlier today on his way to the justice department.
and a lot of people were really surprised when we heard that barr could brief lawmakers on his take-aways from the mueller report as soon as this weekend. even though the mueller report was described as comprehensive. so what is he doing right now? do we know? >> right, those are the big questions here. so we know that bill barr is in the building. he is just a few floors above me here at the justice department. presumably he has been working diligently for the last five hours or so. we saw him arrive here at the department of justice just before 10:00 this morning, and now of course, we know that any report he submits to congress with these principal conclusions, it will not come today. so the question really is, how comprehensive is this confidential report from the special counsel. we know that bill barr reviewed part of it at least yesterday. he referred the report sometime around 4:00, and then he notified congress right around 5:00. he did spend a few hours reviewing it yesterday, was back here at the department of justice today. but there could be a lot to go through here. we don't know the length or the
complexity of the special counsel's confidential report. but we know that he has to go through the report, and then the attorney general has to write up this summary in a sense, for congress. so we know that he will be here, throughout the day today. don't know how long he will be working into the night. but we know that he won't be giving any report to congress, at least until tomorrow, because it was in his own word, ana, that in that letter to congress, he says he expect ors hopes that he could have something to congress this week, meaning maybe we'll see something tomorrow. but of course these deadlines shift and we don't know for sure. >> i just look back down at his letter that he gave to congress, saying i may be in a position to advise you of the special counsel's principal conclusions as soon as this weekend. so he is the one who really put the pressure on himself to get the answers sooner rather than later. there has been this kind of ongoing question about whether the white house would attempt to exert executive privilege over some of the evidence spelled out in the mueller report. what could that potentially
include? >> so any executive privilege would really pertain to these official communications with the president about official business. but it remains to be seen exactly when and in what form the white house would try to exert this privilege. because we do know from pam brown's reporting of just about a week ago, that the white house expects to see any report that's submitted to congress and the public, from the attorney general, it's unclear if the white house will get a chance to see that report, but that was their expectation. so as for this executive privilege claim, this could come in any form. the question is, could it come before bill barr submits this to congress? possibly by the end of the weekend? or would this be more an empt ergs of executive privilege as it pertains to the entire special counsel's confidential report? because obviously we know that the congress is pushing to get that released in its entirety as well. so that is a big question, as to what the white house will exert here. >> jessica schneider, thank you.
and in a rare moment of presidential silence, there is still no word from president trump on the conclusion of the special counsel's investigation. the president has been spending the day golfing, he is now back in mar-a-lago, with his lawyers nearby. gaming out responses as to whatever headlines come out of the mueller report. he released this statement yesterday, saying we are pleased that the office of special counsel has delivered the report to the attorney general pursuant to the regulations. attorney general barr will determine the appropriate next steps. cnn's boris sanchez is live from west palm beach where the president is spending the weekend. boris, take us inside the atmosphere there at mar-a-lago since this news has dropped. >> according to guests and aides that were around the president last night, as he was being updated by some of his attorneys and white house officials, as to the news coming from the department of justice, the president was in a spirited mood. he took part in the lincoln day dinner where he gave a short speech, introducing his friend, the congressman from south
carolina, lindsey graham, but in the president's three-minute speech he spent more time talks about the first lady's approval ratings and didn't mention the mueller report as you noted. the white house pointed back to the statement coming from the legal team saying they look forward to this process being carried out. that all decisions are now in the hands of attorney general barr. privately, though, some white house officials apparently feel vinced kated. one of them telling my colleague, pamela brown, that the fat lady has sung, that democrats in the media should be embarrassed for their role in reporting this story. further, another official, one with the trump campaign, suggested that yesterday was a great day for america. so even though there is still many questions out there about what is actually in this report, some inside the white house and around the president are happy about this. the president himself, as you noted, has not said anything publicly yet. we're waiting to see ultimately what he comes out and says. >> okay, boris sanchez, thank you. so after 675 days, what's
next for robert mueller? stay with us. our special coverage continues after a quick break. there is this place... it can't be found on just any map. a place miles from the beaten path. overcoming twists and turns, ups and downs.... whatever life throws. a place to always strive for. for all the journeys that make us stronger. ♪ 'cos i know what it means ♪ to walk along the lonely street of dreams ♪ ♪ here i go again on my--- you realize your vows are a whitesnake song? i do. if you ride, you get it.
yeah. run with us. search "john deere 1 series" for more. your control. like bedhead. run with us. hmmmm. ♪ rub-a-dub ducky... and then...there's national car rental. at national, i'm in total control. i can just skip the counter and choose any car in the aisle i like. so i can rent fast without getting a hair out of place. heeeeey. hey! ah, control. (vo) go national. go like a pro. before the trip, jessica sent 22 texts to a swim instructor to help manny overcome his fear. their gps took them to places out of a storybook. and they called grandma when manny felt sad about not being able to swim. overall, they shared 176 pictures. but when the moment came, they held their breath, and watched their son learn to believe in himself.
welcome back. the breaking news we're following, attorney general william barr could deliver the principal conclusions of the mueller report to congress this weekend. although we don't know just when that is going to happen. we learned it won't be today. the mueller report was submitted yesterday, after a nearly two-year investigation that included charges against 37 people and entities, search guilty pleas, and one conviction at trial. paul manafort of course. now a d.o.j. source tells cnn there will be no further indictments from robert mueller. but it may not be the last we hear from him either. joining us now, cnn evan perez, crime and justice reporter shimon prokupecz, cnn legal analyst ross garber, with expertise in political investigations and impeachment law, and federal criminal defense attorney caroline
polici. >> let me start with you. we don't know how much we will see of mueller's report but there have been calls of him to testify before congress, and executive privilege, wouldn't stop him from doing that, right? >> no, absolutely not. look, what executive privilege will effect is how much information he is able to provide, whether there is anything that the white house believes is protected by executive privilege. that's stuff he won't be able to discuss with members of congress. at least until the white house withdraws that, or if there is a judge perhaps that rules that that executive privilege doesn't apply. so look, i think you're going to see for some time, some wrangling between the two ends of capitol hill over exactly what can be, and what cannot be discussed about this report. but also, i think one of the things that we have to wait for is to see exactly how detailed this report is. one of the things that we know from our own reporting before the report landed, as bill barr
got, took the chair over at the justice department, became attorney general, in the past month, one of the concerns people around him have had was that the more detailed the mueller report was, the more problematic it was for bill barr, the more difficult it would be for him to be able to distill it, for him to be able to condense it into what essentially will be a barr report for members of congress. the more detail there is, then that stuff is going to be more complicated for him to try to fight off from members of congress. >> ross, the d.o.j. has always operated under the belief that a sitting president can't be indicted. i know it's not technically law. but it is d.o.j. policy right now. and there's also the guidance that we've heard attorney general, rather, deputy attorney general rod rosen stein bring up, which you don't tarnish somebody's reputation if they're not charged with a crime. so we may not see what underlying evidence there was as part of this investigation.
if there are no more indictments. so does it stand to reason that even if the president committed political offenses, relevant to the question of impeachment, for example, we may never know that? >> that is entirely possible. and remember, back when this came up in the clinton administration, there was an independent counsel law, and that independent counsel law said if the independent counsel found evidence of potentially impeachable conduct, the independent counsel had to turn that information over to congress. and after the starr investigation, seemingly both parties said you know what, we don't like how that went down, and that law lapsed. that's no longer the law. and so now, we've got this situation where the justice department, through a special counsel, can do an investigation, can turn over those results, confidentially to the attorney general, and it's totally up to the attorney general to decide what to disclose and what not to disclose, as the attorney general has noted within the law. so right now, it sup to the
attorney general. so you're exactly right. we might not know a ton after this. >> so what do you expect to learn, assuming barr follows d.o.j. policy? >> well, assuming, so, two question, assuming mueller follows d.o.j. policy, the declinations, charge the president with obstruction of justice in any other circumstance when he wasn't the president, but because of the office of legal counsel memorandum which says you can't indict a sitting president, that's why he declined to prosecution, that will tell you something but suppose it is that he declined to prosecution because there wasn't key evidence, and we may never know from a transparency standpoint, because this is not the ken starr report. we are in whole new unchartered territory here. >> i want to bring shimon prokupecz into this conversation too. because mueller never tried to subpoena the president as far as we know and the president was never interviewed in person.
and that has, you know, a lot of people asking why. >> it certainly does. but if you're the president's lawyers, and if you're the president, you are very relieved that this investigation is now come to an end. it's over. there's no possibility now that robert mueller is going to want to subpoena him, ask him any more questions. it's a huge win for the president and his team. they fought very hard to make sure that he's not interviewed by fbi agents, by the special counsel team, because there was always this concern that they could possibly catch him in some kind of what they called perjury trap. so it is a huge victory for the president. it is a huge victory for his attorneys. this was a big issue for them. they did not want him sitting down before prosecutors. >> should mule ver interviewed the president? >> here is one thing that i think we may be able to tell about mueller. he proved pretty fast. a lot of times, you know, prosecutors in general, and
special counsel and independent counsel, in particular, they make a career out of these kinds of investigations. they take years and years and years. and they go off into all sorts of tangents. the fact that mueller finished this up in about two years, and said i'm done, is incredible. and i think in a way, that may be part of the reason why he decided to not try to force the president to testify. i think he realized that it would be a multi-year battle and in the end, he might not be successful. no president has ever been forced to testify before a grand jury before. >> everyone, stand by. much more to discuss. the mueller report maybe done. but the investigations into president trump certainly are not. so what legal peril remains? we'll continue our discussion in just a moment. we're live in the cnn newsroom, i'm ana cabrera. don't go anywhere. it sure is.mom) (mom vo) over the years, we trusted it to carry and protect the things that were most important to us.
we always knew we had a lot of life ahead of us. (mom) remember this? (mom vo) that's why we chose a car that we knew would be there for us through it all. (male vo) welcome to the all-new 2019 subaru forester. the longest-lasting, most trusted forester ever. from maybelline new york in 2 finishes matte + poreless and dewy + smooth to fit tone and texture. 64 fits fit me! foundation only from maybelline new york (danny) after a long day of hard work... ...you have to do more work? (vo) automatically sort your expenses and save over 40 hours a month. (danny) every day you're nearly fried to a crisp, professionally! (vo) you earned it, we're here to make sure you get it. quickbooks. backing you.
the latest inisn't just a store.ty it's a save more with a new kind of wireless network store. it's a look what your wifi can do now store. a get your questions answered by awesome experts store. it's a now there's one store that connects your life like never before store. the xfinity store is here. and it's simple, easy, awesome.
i don't think anybody knows it is russia that broke into the dnc. how many times do i have to answer this question? russia is a ruse. this thing with trump and russia is a made-up story. >> the entire thing is a witch hunt. >> the russia story is a total fab ration. >> russia did not help me, okay? i call it the russian hoax. >> they made up the whole russia hoax. that was a democrat hoax. >> it is a democrat hoax. >> robert mueller is done. zero new indictments as he finished his report. president trump is golfing this weekend in florida. at his mar-a-lago resort. but the legal peril is not over for the trump family. not by a long shot. mueller's decision does not issue any new indictments, we're told, it does not mean though
that the president did not commit any crime, it only means that mueller may have followed the long-standing protocol that prohibits the justice department from indicting a sitting president. everyone is back with me now. caroline, trump's former national security adviser michael flynn still hasn't been sentenced. we know roger stone's case continues. and mueller's team told a court that manafort's right-hand guy rick gates was still cooperating in several ongoing investigations. now we're learning today that gates' case has been handed over to the dc just attorney's office but why would mueller bring his investigation to a close with all of the loose ends still out will? >> one reason, like the behavior throughout the entire of the process, he is very keen on farming out those instances of potential criminal conduct that he sees that fall outside of his core mandate. so if it falls outside of the russia collusion and the potential interaction between the campaign and russians, that, he is going out, so the financial fraud of michael
cohen, for example, and you know, the s.e.c. violations that everybody was so amazed at, that came ou came, out of the southern district. rick gate, what he is like little cooperating on in dc, is the investigation of the trump inaugural committee. so it is very big news that there will be no indictments of americans for conspiracy with the russians. i mean if trump is saying it is a hoax, it's a hoax, the russia thing is certainly not a hoax, because we saw several rounds of indictments from robert mueller indicting russians but the bred crumbs that he left saying potentially americans were involved, it is just not happening. >> does this now put to bed the cloud over the president, mueller's report being concluded? >> look, i think for the president, it's a big deal that this investigation ended. it does begin to lift the cloud over the president. but i think you also have to acknowledge that the president, all of those clips you showed of
the president saying russia didn't help me, there was no russia thing, that is not true. robert mueller's investigation affirmed what the intelligence community found, which was that there were these efforts by russia, by the intelligence, the russian intelligence agencies, to help donald trump get elected. that is undeniable. so that will forever hang over donald trump's presidency. whether he wants to admit it or not, right? the fact is, the fact that there is nobody else close to this campaign, or if it was within his family, that's going to be indicted, as a result of any part of the russia ties, it is a big deal. and i think everybody's breathing a sigh of relief. but there are a couple of other investigations that are still ongoing that may touch his family, his company, in new york, for instance, where the southern district of new york continues to look into whether or not anyone else was involved in the election fraud, i'm
sorry, the campaign finance fraud violation there. all of those things will remain ongoing. and of course, the members of congress, the democrats, are going to keep investigating. >> right. you mentioned that the sdny investigation, the new york state investigation, there are additional investigation has we know looking into trump's inauguration, looking into the trump organization, so those haven't ended yet, but back to the mueller investigation, shimon, do you think we will hear from mueller himself? because we've talked so often about how close to the vest he has kept all of this, how quiet he has been, not a peep throughout the last 675 days. >> yes, isn't it pretty remarkable, that we haven't heard anything from him? and i think it will not come to, or surprise anyone, who has been covering robert mueller, who knows robert mueller, if it is up to him, he will never speak about this, we will never hear from him, we may hardly ever see him again. the only way perhaps that we may hear from him is if he is forced
to come before congress. it is not something he wants to do. it's not something he is going to do voluntarily. he is probably going to be forced to do it. he may work something out. but he definitely does not want to speak about this publicly. we've never seen him talk about this. there were a few press conferences concerning this investigation. and we've always seen the deputy attorney general stand before microphone, without robert mueller. and what is the way he is. that is the way he was when he was running the fbi. assuming that's the way he was when he was at the department of justice. we may never hear from him. that's the bottom line. >> garrett graph has written a whole book on mueller and how he operates and pointed out in the past, we already have seen hundreds of pages of the mueller report, because of all of the indictments that have come out, all of the other court documents per tarianing to plea deals that have come through, and what we kept on hearing is given these plea deals to people, there must be a bigger fish that is coming, that he is after, and here we,
are no more new indictments, what do you make of that? why would he give these plea deals to feem if there was no bigger fish? >>. >> here is why. we're both defense lawyers. what we often see are plea deals given to people who will flip on somebody, who will cooperate against somebody. well, another reason to give a plea deal to somebody is because you want information from them. you want them to be perhaps even testify, and that might be because you're looking for them to incriminate somebody. it could also be because you want them on the record exonerating somebody. and so that maybe part of what is happening here. is he's given plea deals, he's gotten their cooperation, and they provided information that he's decided is truthful, but it just doesn't incriminate anybody. >> shimon? >> what i want to add is i think people need to not forget that while there has been this large focus on the president, as being perhaps the big fish, there are russians that the government has been investigated, that the fbi has been investigated, that
ultimately would be the big fish in all of this. remember, this was an investigation into russian interference, relationship with the russians was a key part of this investigation, and that is what paul manafort was partially, they wanted him for that cooperation, because remember, it was he who shared campaign polling data, remember the special counsel's office said that was at the heart of their investigation, that relationship, that manafort had with this russian intelligence official. so that is what i think people need not forget. that is still going on. that is going to keep going on. and if the government, if the fbi could get people to cooperate, in these investigations, they're going to do it. and i think that's ultimately, is where paul manafort's help is what the fbi wanted. they wanted his help in that part of this investigation. >> quickly, caroline. >> yes, also, hindsight is 20/20, so it could have been that maybe yes, they were looking for a bigger fish besides the russians, and so they wanted to get these cooperation deals early on. if you look at the deals that were cut, they were early on in the investigation.
that was probably, you know, a tactic to just sort of see if there was anything out there, potentially, and use the information to their advantage. >> all right, everyone, thank you so much for being with us. walking us through all of this. as we await the mueller report, and the conclusions that have now been turned over to the attorney general of the united states. our correspondents continue to work their sources on the mueller report, as we follow this breaking news. also, just hours ago, u.s.-backed fighters declared total victory over isis in syria. a huge story, obviously. i'll get reaction from a top democrat on the house armed services committee, next. hey mercedes, how about letting your hair down a little? how about a car for people who don't play golf? hey mercedes! mix it up a little. how about something for a guy who doesn't want a corner office? hey mercedes, i don't even own a tie. do you think i need a mahogany dashboard? hey mercedes, can you make it a little cooler in here? [ a-class ] i am setting the temperature [ a-class ] to 68 degrees. we hear you. we made a car that does, too. the all-new a-class. all-new thinking starting at $32,500.
the way you triumph over adversity. and live your lives. that's why we redesigned humira. we wanted to make the experience better for you. now there's less pain immediately following injection. we've reduced the size of the needle and removed the citrate buffers. and it has the same effectiveness you know and trust. humira citrate-free is here. a little change can make a big difference. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection.
[music playing] jerry has a membership to this gym, but he's not using it. and he has subscriptions to a music service he doesn't listen to and five streaming video services he doesn't watch. this is jerry learning that he's still paying for this stuff he's not using. he's seeing his recurring payments in control tower in the wells fargo mobile app. this is jerry canceling a few things. booyah. this is jerry appreciating the people who made this possible. oh look, there they are. (team member) this is wells fargo.
they wrap up their fight to see the entire mueller report, not just a sum rifrt findings and with us now is someone who was on the conference call, congressman john garamendi of california. thanks for taking the time. any update on when william barr plans to provide his principal conclusion? >> he said this week so we'll wait. we will wait for the final chapter in what is a very fascinating and extremely important process here. we've seen chapters. we've seen manafort. we've seen cohen. we've seen the russians. we've seen indictments. we've seen guilty pleas. and now we can see the conclusion. we will wait patiently for a day. but it is the american public, it's not the democrats that are demanding that everything is made public, it is really the american public, everyone wants to know what this is all about and draw their own conclusions. >> for sure. what does principal conclusions tell you though about how much of mueller's report barr plans to reveal? >> well, whatever he plans to reveal, i will just assert that
the american public will stand for nothing less than the total report, with the exception of the things that show how they, through the intelligence sources, gathered information. but the american public will not be satisfied. democrats or republicans will not be satisfied. and all of the american public out there who has worked on this, listened to this for more than two years, really wants to know what the details are. and so, eventually, it may be a fight, it may be a struggle, but eventually, the story will come out, and whatever barr says tomorrow, or the next day, will simply be chapter headings. >> and we do know that, as you point out, all of the american public wants to know, democrats and republicans, i know the house took a vote on just that, and it was unanimous. 400 people said that full report should come out. but here is the argument from deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. quote, punishing wrong had-doers
through judicial proceedings is only one part of the department's mission. we also have a duty to prevent the disclosure of information that would unfairly tarnish people who are not charged with crimes. so do you disagree with rosenstein on that point? >> he apparently has a very short memory. you remember what the justice department did to hillary clinton during the campaign? she was never charged. >> that was not rosenstein though and everybody was critical about how the justice department handled her case. >> what i'm saying is he has a short memory, not of his own work, but 6 of what the justice department did two years ago, two and a half years ago, so the facts are, the public really needs to know all of the information, and this is not about protecting people. this is really about our democracy. there is no doubt that russia interfered with the 2016 election. there is an open question about what was the president's involvement in that process. perhaps the mueller report will get to that. but to simply say, well, there's no crime, and therefore, there's no information, that is not acceptable. we need the american public
need, democrats, republicans, independents, and the american public, and in fact, our democracy, needs to know the details. >> the numbers are impressive. 37 people and entities who face criminal charges. we know 199 overall criminal counts are part of this. all the indictments. the plea deals. the person convicted at trial, paul manafort. now, if these final numbers are what's it, and they equal no collusion, is this still a big political victory for the president? >> we don't know. we do know that each one of those indictments, each one of those people that have been charged, those are the opening chapters, in what is the biggest scandal that the american public has endured in its presidency forever. now, whether the president is involved or not, we don't yet know. perhaps the investigation, the final chapter that mueller has now given to the justice
department, that at least the headlines will be revealed, by mr. barr, maybe, or maybe not, it will implicate the president. we don't know. but what we do know is that this is an incredible scandal. and this is a real shot into the very heart of the american democracy, that has gone on during the 2016 campaign, and beyond. clearly, there was an effort to stop this investigation. there's no doubt that that was, that that happened. was that a cover-up? was that a crime? well, perhaps the final chapter in mr. mueller's report will reveal that. but in any case, we do know that there was a serious effort, by russia, and by people that were involved in the trump campaign, that were working, with the russians, or people that were
associated with russia -- >> or in communications with russias. we know there were at least 16 communications, 16 people who were part of the trump orbit who communicated with russians that doesn't initially disclose those communications, so i hear what you're saying on that point. but you have this call with the democratic party leaders today. what did you learn? and what is the next move by your party after you see mueller's conclusions? >> well, the next move is to demand transparency. demand that all of the information be forthcoming. >> does that mean you're going to subpoena people, or documents? what does that mean when you say demand transparency? >> it is the american public that is demanding transparency. it's not just the democrats in congress. or the committee chairman. it is the american public. and we will do the best we can to make all of the information available. would subpoenas be necessary? we would hope not. we would hope that the justice department would make all of the
information available, much as they did with the over 800,000 pages of information that was made available to the committees when the republicans controlled the house of representatives. they asked for it. they, the republicans asked for it. they got over 800,000 pages of information. that, whatever information is out there, that should also be made available. and let's keep in mind, i've said it three times, i'll say it a fourth time, this is the american public that wants to know. we're simply instruments in that process of making that information available to the american public. it's about transparency. and it is about our democracy at the beginning and the end of this process, it's about how can we protect our democracy from foreign influence. and perhaps from americans that chose to be involved with that effort by a foreign government to influence the election. >> all right, congressman, good to have you with us.
thank you very much. >> thank you. also, breaking, a terrifying rescue at sea. more than a thousand people are trapped on a crippled cruise ship. much more ahead in the newsroom, right after a quick break. or child. or other child. or their new friend. or your giant nephews and their giant dad. or a horse. or a horse's brother, for that matter. the room for eight, 9,000 lb towing ford expedition. run with us on a john deere 1 series tractor. beacuse changing your attachments, should be as easy as... what about this? changing your plans. yeah. run with us. search "john deere 1 series" for more. hi, what's this social security alert? it's a free alert if we find your social security number on the dark web. good, cuz i'm a little worried about
my information getting out. why's that? [bird speaking] my social is 8- 7- 5 dash okay, i see. [bird laughing] somebody thinks it's hilarious. free social security alerts from discover. somebody thinks it's hilarious. sometimes a cough gets in the way of a good night's sleep. that's when he needs vicks vaporub. proven cough medicine. with 8 hours of vapors, so he can sleep. vicks vaporub. goodnight coughs. might mean a trip back to the doctor's office just for a shot. but why go back there when you can stay home with neulasta onpro? strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems,
allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. if you'd rather be home, ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card.
helping the passengers. the crew sent a mayday distress signal. there were reports of high winds in the area. the viking sky is owned by viking ocean cruises. and just took its first trip in 2017. joining us now by phone, the joint rescue center for southern norway. thanks for being with us. what can you tell us about the on going evacuation, what is the process. >> we are having -- leading the evacuation process, and 115 of the passengers have been lifted off the ship. >> how are you going about -- >> helicopters, because of the rough weather. >> so you're using helicopters because of the rough weather. you said rough weather, describe for me the conditions that are making another evacuations challenging? >> the waves are around 6 to 8 meters high. and as close to storm.
but the ship is laying steady, so we can lift them up with the helicopters, we will do that through the whole night. >> through the whole night? >> how long do you anticipate the entire process then to take? >> well, parallel with lifting off and evacuating people, we are trying hard to get the engines to work again. so the ship can go by its own machine to a safe harbor. it's two operations in parallel. right now, we hope -- we can't say how long it will take. >> we do know. and correct me if i'm wrong, there were 1300 individuals on board the ship when it started to suffer and a call went out. you say 115 people have been evacuated so far, that means there are a lot of people still on board. how are the people doing who are still on board? >> we have no information on
that, but as far as we know, we are -- it's good, and they are in good conditions. and we have 8 people with injuries and they have been brought ashore. as far as we know, it's okay. >> you said, light injuries. what does that mean? >> yeah, maybe a broken bone or something like that. but nothing seriously. >> okay, so not life threatening injuries. >> no. no, not at all. >> we're seeing some of the video, and you talked about the wind and the waves and those very cold temperatures. we also reported that it was range. how often are you having to make a rescue like this? i can't imagine it's very common. which makes this a pretty extraordinary circumstance, right? >> yes, it is. of course it is. so many people. and so close to shore, and in such bad weather. it's a special situation for all of us.
nick's mom called the t-ball league eight times to help her shy son make some new friends. his parents shared videos of highlights, dance moves, and jimmy carlyle stealing third... almost. they sent seven texts when a new friend invited nick for a play date. but in the end, they put their phones down, and watched as nick finally felt part of the team. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. mike and jen doyle?
yeah. time for medicare, huh. i have no idea how we're going to get through this. follow me. choosing a plan can be super-complicated. but it doesn't have to be. unitedhealthcare can guide you through the confusion, with helpful people, tools and plans. including the only plans with the aarp name. well that wasn't so bad at all. that's how we like it. aarp medicare plans, from unitedhealthcare. (danny)'s voice)ans, of course you don'te because you didn't!? your job isn't doing hard work... ...it's making them do hard work... ...and getting paid for it. (vo) snap and sort your expenses to save over $4,600 at tax time. quickbooks. backing you.
with sensors that alert you when your eyes are off the road. the all-new subaru forester. the safest forester ever. our 2018 cnn 450heroes keep making others feel good. >> we built and delivered 1100 bunk beds. we trained 14 new chapters, averaging about 15 every other month. we partnered with fema and the
red cross. and are offering beds to people who have been affected across the country. >> normally we look for partners, now partners are looking for us. with the classroom we've been given -- >> every day people -- ordinary people, but with big big hearts wants to make a difference. >> to nominate someone you think should be our next cnn hero. go to cnn heroes.com. i want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. thanks for being with us. our breaking news this hour. william barr right now crafting a summary of the robert mueller report and its principle conclusions to deliver to congress possibly as soon as this weekend. 675 days. that's how long we have been waiting for mus