tv Anderson Cooper 360 CNN March 26, 2019 9:00pm-10:00pm PDT
hey now! [ ding ] you can even troubleshoot, learn new voice commands and much more. clean my daughter's room. [ ding ] oh, it won't do that. welp, someone should. just say "teach me more" into your voice remote and see how you can have an even better x1 experience. simple. easy. awesome. good evening, another busy night. late word on what the president said today behind closed doors on capitol hill. some controversial statements that he reportedly hoped would stay behind closed doors even though he doubted they really would. well, they did get out, and we'll bring you the details.
but we twbegin with a major new development about something the president talked a lot about today in public and private. robert mueller's conclusions. a justice department official telling cnn that we could be reading his report within weeks and not months. weeks. this official also telling us there are no plans to give the white house an early copy. and another official, this one with the administration, confirming that indeed no one at the white house has seen a copy, which means that when the president today said what you're about to hear him say, he almost certainly had not read the entire mueller report. >> mueller report was great. it could not have been better. it said no obstruction. no collusion. it could not have been better. >> keeping them honest, the president appears to be painting with a very broad brush there. he's suggesting he's seen the mueller report which he says was great when there's no evidence that he has. and he's saying it exonerates him entirely. now, to be generous, the president isn't always precise with his language you may have noticed. assume for a minute that he's conflating the mueller report with attorney general barr's four-page summary of it, which is all that he or any of us have
seen. at least that we know of. but even allowing for that he's still falsely characterizing the conclusions. the barr summary does not say there was no obstruction of justice. it says that he, the attorney general, decided not to pursue an obstruction case and his summary includes this now famous passage from the full mueller report on the subject of obstruction of justice, quoting, "while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." as to the president's no collusion claim, it's more clear-cut and certainly more favorable to team trump and i want to point out good news for the country. someone who disliked the president may be disappointed in the fact the report didn't find he or his campaign conspired or coordinated with russia to impact the election. but the fact that the president didn't do that is good news for america. quoting from the barr summary and again not the mueller report but the barr summary of it, "the special counsel's investigation did not find that the trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 presidential
election." so according to the attorney general robert mueller found no evidence of chargeable crimes. and that is certainly a major vindication for the president. was there inappropriate contact with russians that didn't rise to the level of criminality? conduct that cnn national security commentator susan hennessy today called awful but lawful. we don't know. and we won't know one way or another until the complete mueller report comes out. until it does neither we nor the president nor anyone else can really make blanket statements about what robert mueller did not or did uncover. the barr summary as you know says the special counsel identified two main russian efforts to influence the 2016 election, which of course parallels what the intelligence community more broadly suspected in early 2016, concluded later that year, and has maintained ever since. even as it has, the president has resisted that conclusion and of course has a long history of giving vladimir putin the benefit of the doubt, something that we don't know the mueller report will speak to or not. what we do know is we've often turned to author strategist and retired army colonel ralph
peters for the subject as we do tonight. >> colonel peters so, the collusion question, which is not really a legal question, may be answered. but what remains i guess unanswered which are many things, one is why the president has acted the way he has continually toward putin over the course of the last three years. >> and indeed, anderson, that is the primary question. and it's astonished me we've all lost sight of that. everything else is important. from the question of obstruction of justice to whether or not there was formal collusion. but the issue of whether vladimir putin and his cronies have any direct influence over the president of the united states and his decisions i cannot imagine a question more important, i cannot imagine something more important for our intelligence agencies. and unfortunately because of the way the intelligence world works there may not be answers in the mueller report. we may never get the right answers. but it comes back to exactly
what you said. why. why won't the president ever criticize putin? >> the president has said one thing on this really which he's essentially said wouldn't it be great if we could get along with russia, it would be a good thing, annot a bad thing? might it also be as simple as him having an affinity for strong authoritarian leaders or sort of wanting tome lait them or being intimidated by them? it's not just putin. kim jong un, who he said he actually likes as opposed to john mccain, who he -- was not his sort of person. kim jong un, according to sarah sanders, the president likes him and therefore he eliminated some sanctions. also about duterte in the philippines, muhammad bin salman and others. >> in the through the looking glass world of trump things are possible that we never would have thought possible before. but trump has criticized at some point every other leader, even president xi of china. he's certainly been vociferous at times in his criticism of kim.
but he won't criticize putin. and why does he want sanctions relief? why has he been slow rolling sanctions that passed? why does he seem to just dovetail with putin's view of the world? now, anderson, i may be utterly wrong. i may be influenced by my background as an intelligence officer. but again, i go back to what so far has not been addressed. the steele dossier. and it's been pooh-poohed and mocked. but that is the way the russians do business. given trump's behavioral profile, he was a perfect target. and you know, you want various explanations. hey, the steele dossier is one viable one. now, did the russians help trump just because they hated hillary so much? did they just want to disrupt our system? it may be a combination of many things. but at the end of the day we need to know whether or not
vladimir putin -- whether he has any sort of control over the president of the united states. why does trump have to meet with him behind closed doors without witnesses? again, as a former intelligence officer i look for patterns. and the trump pattern of behavior with and toward vladimir putin troubles me deeply. anderson, i've got to stress something. i have not flacking for the democratic party. i believe both parties have failed us miserably. in the last presidential election we had the choice between lucifer and satan. but i care about the united states of america. i want it to be well and honestly governed. i want american security. and so i need to know more about this and i can't let it go. i just can't let it go. the steele dossier just rings true to me. >> in the -- obviously the barr memo is all we've really seen -- >> and precious little. >> yes, precious little. i'm wondering what you made of
what you saw in that and how important it is to you that as much of the mueller is report actually be released. because we've now learned it may be weeks, not months. >> we're going to be arguing about this for a while. and when we do get something in weeks it's not going to be complete. we'll see what we get, and there will be a great deal more to talk about. and by the way, with the initial reaction to this very -- this painfully brief and tendentious barr letter with the dole rousse reaction on the left and the premature euphoria on the right, i was reminded of the wonderful old serial "the bowery boys" where they used to say "don't jump to contusions." and i'm afraid a lot of people have been jumping to contusions. this is going to play out for a long time. i certainly want to see what's in it. but everything that was in that brief barr letter matters. of course it matters. i'm a little disappointed -- i believe in robert mueller. he's a man of integrity. i was a little disappointed he didn't pony up to the bar and
make a decision one way or the other about obstruction of justice. i trust his findings, that there was no formal conspiracy between trump's campaign and the russians. so it's not a question of getting trump. as much as i may dislike him personally. as an american citizen the best outcome for me would be the president is blameless and flawless and russia has no grip on him. >> thank you very much. appreciate it. >> thank you. more perspective now on what we might see in the actual mueller report. joining us, investigative reporter and author and cnn political analyst carl bern stephen. also former nixon white house ounce counsel and senior contributor john dean. so carl, barr is saying that they'll make a version of the mueller report public. we're told it's going to be in weeks. how much discretion does he have about what ends up in the version that's released? >> well, except for grand jury material and national security excisions which might in both instances require a judge to give permission for material to
be used, he has an awful lot of discretion, to let us see almost everything. and it's imperative that we see everything. >> but he could -- the other side is he could redact stuff -- >> he could. and redaction is no satisfactory answer here because what we know is that we have this very basic finding about, quote, collusion or no conspiracy with the russian government. and the ambiguous conclusion of mueller that is quoted by barr about an obstruction that may or may not have been an obstruction. we need to see everything about it because presumably, and this is a presumption, the whole mueller report will tell a tale. there will be connective tissue that hopefully will answer some of colonel peters' questions there. we know almost nothing from what mr. barr served up the other day except a legal conclusion that's
very important. but in terms of the underlying facts, in terms of a narrative about what happens either with the russians or with an obstruction or non-obstruction, we know nothing so far. >> john, in terms of the doj saying it has no plans to give the white house an advance copy of the mueller report, a, that doesn't mean that they wouldn't brief them in advance of more details of what's in the mueller report, i assume, or does it? and also, i mean, do you think it's still possible that the white house is going to demand to see an advance copy, to see if there's anything on executive privilege? >> i would think that would be one of their arguments. they want to see something that should be withheld for executive privilege reasons because they did supply information to the special counsel with the precondition that they could later invoke executive privilege. that would not be a reason, however, to breach the norm
where they get some sort of deep briefing on this before it's sent over. they could -- there could be like a 24-hour period to withhold it going public if they want to exercise privilege. there's another area that would be withheld, is the case that's have been referred out for other u.s. attorneys to look at. and if there's material of that nature in there, that will obviously be -- >> they wouldn't want the public -- prosecutors in various jurisdictions to have their cases, that their hand's tipped. >> they don't want to tip witnesses off in those cases as to what's going on or possibly even the defendant in those cases. so that will be withheld too. >> it does seem -- carl, the president's saying -- the president is a very good marketer, obviously, and has an incredible knack for defining things in a certain way very successfully. whether they're true or not. so he is out there saying the entire report is great, no collusion, no obstruction. when by all accounts he actually
hasn't seen the report. >> also, he got a football and he ran with it here. and what he did get with the football was kind of a good reading in the first part about, quote, no collusion or conspiracy with very carefully stated the russian government. and he'll keep running with that. and we saw mr. giuliani running with it with wolf blitzer this afternoon on "situation room." there's another element to this, though, and that is the whole classified counterintelligence investigation and how much of that can be redacted in such a way that congress, the senior members of congress who are cleared to see this material can get that part of the story. all of this fits together. we need after two years to definitively know what happened not just with the president of the united states, with his campaign, but what the matrix of all of this that we have been talking about, debating, jurnts
have been writing about, there's been huge controversy, the country has been riven by what has occurred here and there now is presumably the means of finding out a good deal that could clarify things if the attorney general of the united states and the president of the united states is willing to allow this material out. and the republicans on the hill, this is not a good piece of news that mitch mcconnell, the republican leader, stepped in and said, well, maybe we won't pass that legislation that says -- or that resolution that says that this material should be released. >> john, we heard from former attorney general eric holder saying his six years as attorney general he never received anything from a prosecutor without a charging recommendation. how outside the norm is it of what mueller has apparently done? >> very outside the norm. and certainly in the federal system.
that was certainly the standard practice in my time even and it's probably been ever since. so it's very unusual that mueller did not make a recommendation. and it's hard to believe that he was somehow hung up on what decision to make. he just doesn't seem like somebody of that nature. >> can i ask john a question? >> we're actually out of time. >> i'll ask you outside. >> john dean and carl bernstein, thanks very much. coming up next, new reporting on what the president said this afternoon about the mueller investigation. and his new effort to unravel obamacare. all of it when cameras were not rolling. and later, after all that, why did authorities just drop all charges against jussie smollett? chicago's mayor is furious. we'll have all the details ahead. feel the clarity of non-drowsy claritin and relief from symptoms caused by over 200 indoor and outdoor allergens. like those from buddy. because stuffed animals
the kenya tea development agency is an organization that is owned by tea farmers. every week we sell this tea, we get paid in multiple accounts. we were looking for a bank to provide a safe and efficient technology platform to pay our farmers. citi was the only one that was able to ensure that this was done seamlessly. and today, at the touch of a button, all the farmers are able to get their money, pay school fees and improve their standard of living. with citi, we see a bright future for our farmers and their families. ♪ ♪ so, recently my son's band was signed by a record label. a record deal? unbelievable. whenever we're about to get on a stage for a huge audience,
i always give my dad, like, a facetime kinda moment. you see the crowd, you see the emotion. you know, he has that experience for the first time with me, and that's really important to me. i created a rockstar. (both laughing) (announcer) the best network is even better when you share it. buy the latest iphone for you, and get iphone 10r on us for someone else. and get apple music on us, too. only on verizon. ♪ book now and enjoy free unlimited open bar and more. norwegian cruise line. feel free. each day justin at work... walk. and after work. he does it all with dr. scholl's. only dr. scholl's has massaging gel insoles that provide all-day comfort. to keep him feeling more energized. dr. scholl's. born to move. i switched to geico and saved hundreds.
that's a win. but it's not the only reason i switched. geico's a company i can trust, with over 75 years of great savings and service. ♪ now that's a win-win. switch to geico. it's a win-win. ♪ behr presents: tough as walls. that's some great paint. ♪ that's some great paint. ♪ that's some great paint. behr ultra, a top-rated interior and exterior paint. paint, prime, protect - all in one. now that's some great paint! find it exclusively at the home depot. breaking news on the president's take on the mueller report. this time as we mentioned at the
top of the program behind closed doors he spoke today at a luncheon with senate republicans but the contents of the conversation have gotten out. it's in no small part due to maggie haberman's reporting. she's of course "the new york times" white house correspondent and a cnn political analyst and joins us by phone. >> so maggie, what was the president's mood like up on capitol hill today? >> ebullient for him, anderson. as ebullient as he gets. he clearly felt vindicated, made that clear. described the last two years with, you know, a curse word to describe what he had been through. then ticked through a litany of either pet peeves or concerns or legislative issues. said he wanted the party to focus on health care. he thinks that's incredibly important. he was critical and he had charts accompanying him on the amount of money that the government has spent toward puerto rico after hurricane maria. and that i think caught a lot of attention afterwards. but look, this is feeling
valedictory for him and it's comparable to how we saw him right after the 2016 presidential election. >> it was just yesterday we were learning back in february the president was talking about ways to limit aid to puerto rico. so he brought charts today. was anything determined about what he wants done or not done? >> no. i mean, he talked about -- he compared spending for aid to puerto rico, compared to places like texas that have been hit and ravaged by hurricanes and he suggested that these are coincidentally red states southern america had been spending their mother better. i think this is a remark he thinks plays well with his base of support but at the end of the day puerto ricans are american citizens and he's talking about how they deserve less relief money. it's ironic thinking this is a president who comes from new york, which was hit by a terrorist attack on september 11th, 2001 and anyone who suggested that new york should not get aid afterwards was
criticized pretty aggressively and it's sort of interesting seeing how he's going about this especially considering new york's very large puerto rican community. >> what exactly did he say about obamacare? >> he said that obamacare can't be fixed and that he gets attacked when he says, that and i'm paraphrasing, but that it can't be fixed and he gets criticized for saying it but he has to say it. suggested again as he did on his way into the luncheon that the republican party will become known as the party of health care. remember the justice department filed this suit yesterday to get rid of the aca entirely. it was a move that was criticized by some even within the administration as questionably timed given health care is an issue the democrats won the midterms on in 2019. the president is coming off arguably his best few days in two years of his presidency.
and to immediately step into such a controversy struck some people as surprising. >> and did he elaborate at all, do we know, on the notion he brought up yesterday wanting an investigation into the russia investigation? >> he did bring that up, and he has again talked about having lindsey graham investigate the investigators and how the mueller probe came to be. you know, lindsey graham has certainly sounded interested in that. he expressed on twitter the desire to have james comey the fired fbi director come testify before the senate. we'll see where that goes. >> maggie haberman, thanks very much. >> thanks, anderson. >> more now on the question what democrats do with this moment and with the president in a far different position than they might have imagined. joining us today, "usa today" column exist cnn political analyst kirsten powers and democratic strategist paul beggala. kirsten, should it come as any surprise the president is as maggie says in an ebullient mood, in a good mood right now? who wouldn't be? >> yeah, no. of course. i think that there's a major
sigh of relief among not just the president but among the people around him who were also caught up in this investigation and they have a lot to be happy about in terms of the finding around collusion. i think that there is still a question of what is actually in mueller's report. and i think that if democrats are able to get their hands on that it may be a different story, it may not make the president so happy. but for now i'd say that yes, he has a lot to be happy about and it is strange for him to be bringing up health care, an area where the republican party really is not favored when it comes to electoral politics, and you'd think he would just be focusing on what is pretty undeniably at least one big win for him. >> paul, one of the things he does seem to be focusing on also is talking about getting vengeance on those he feels wronged by.
it seems -- does that -- obviously it's not -- i don't know. do you think that's wise? >> with malice toward all and charity toward none. i haven't looked to see what president reagan said after iran contra. actually the independent commission review board, it was p a special counsel, it was a review board. he said, i studied the board's report. its findings are honest, convincing and highly critical. and i accept them. he called for unity. and i don't think anybody's going to confuse donald trump with president reagan. but it really is interesting. he can't get out of his own way. i don't know if it's because he is worried that the full mueller report won't be quite as nice as the carefully selected 65 words that we got from attorney general barr. that's all we got. 65 words from mueller in the barr letter. and i would guess, knowing that barr was put there by president trump, that they're pretty favorable to trump because that's what mr. barr wants to see and believe.
i think this lashing out, maybe it's just what he does. maybe it's like even at a birthday party, you know, he throws cake at his guests or something. i don't know. but i suspect that he's still pretty worried. >> do you think the idea of bringing up obamacare, do you think that has anything to do with concerns about, you know, weeks from now the mueller report coming out and people still focusing on it, this gives people something else to focus on and it's obviously a very lightning rod issue? >> if i were advising him and if he were still worried about the mueller report, and if i worked for him i would be, i would find issues that he stands for that are popular with the american people. and repealing obamacare would take away the protection of pre-existing conditions, of which half of all americans have a pre-existing condition. it would deny health care instantly, if he wins this lawsuit, to 23 million americans who now get health care and are better off for it. it's a stone loser politically.
so the fact that president trump is raising it now, it's kind of evidence of how he's never been above 50%. his entire presidency he's never had majority support. despite a strong economy, despite actually terrific skills at manipulating social media particularly and encouraging his base, he's never got anne boff 50. and it's because -- maybe it's because he really does want to take away health care. maybe we ought to -- i ought to start believing him that he's serious when he says he wants to take away health care from 23 million americans and pre-existing condition protection as way from hundreds of millions. >> something the president supposedly said in his meeting is he forgave hillary clinton after the election. your thoughts on that are? because it seems like he brings her up a lot. >> what does he need to forgive her for? it doesn't even -- i mean, i really was puzzled by that. i don't know, you know -- she didn't do anything to him. i mean, they ran against each other. of course we look at past presidents and the friendships that they've formed.
you look at the first president bush and bill clinton, who you know, became good friends. you don't -- you just don't see this kind of inability to move forward the way the president seems to have had but now says he needs to forgive her. i've never heard anybody talk this way about a former -- you know, somebody that they ran against. a former opponent. it's not personal. it's just a campaign. >> we talked about this last night. nancy pelosi saying the democrats in the house should focus on their agenda, their message, not the mueller probe. i guess also then by extension impeachment. how many of them do you actually expect to listen to her on that, and is that something you also firmly believe they should do? >> i strongly believe in it. during the transition before nancy became speaker, again, i talked to her about this. i asked her about impeachment. she said what do you think? i said i think your imposition is on impeachment is we're all for it is as soon as the republicans ask you to do it. because if it's not bipartisan on takeoff it won't be
bipartisan on the landing. that's her position and it has been since the beginning of her term as speaker. it's very wise. constitutionally wise most importantly but also it's politically very wise. there are some democrats who want to rush toward impeachment. i've long thought that's a big mistake. the democrats now have some power. and they should be judged on i think legislation more than investigation. and the priority should be legislation more than investigation. and look what speaker pelosi's doing. she's moving a health care bill. not a radical one to take over the entire health care but to improve obamacare and to get prescription drug costs down. i think she's absolutely been brilliant on this. >> kirsten powers, paul begala, thank you very much. coming up next more breaking news. prosecutors make a stunning announcement in the jussie smollett case. and what they have to say and why chicago's mayor and police chief superintendent are outraged. and it comes in all those amazing colors.
uh huh. what if we give the people iphone xr, when they join t-mobile? iphone xr on us? yeah, iphone xr on us! what's not to love about that? for a limited time, join t-mobile and get the awesome iphone xr on us. dad! dad!! can you drive me to jessica's house? ♪ at northwestern mutual, this is what our version of financial planning looks like. tomorrow is important, but so is making the most of the house before they're out of the house. spend your life living. find an advisor at northwesternmutual.com.
run with us on a john deere 1 series tractor. beacuse changing your attachments, should be as easy as... what about this? changing your plans. yeah. run with us. search "john deere 1 series" for more. introducing the all new chevy silverado. yeah. it's the official truck of calloused hands and elbow grease. the official truck of getting to work, and getting to work. of late nights, and date nights. it's the official truck of homecoming, and coming home. the all new chevy silverado. the strongest, most advanced silverado ever. it's the official truck of real people.
all of you. how you live, what you love. that's what inspired us to create america's most advanced internet. internet that puts you in charge. that protects what's important. it handles everything, and reaches everywhere. this is beyond wifi, this is xfi. simple. easy. awesome. xfinity, the future of awesome.
breaking news from chicago tonight. the 16 felony counts of disorderly conduct against actor jussie smollett have been dropped. prosecutors had charged smollett after they say he staged an elaborate hate crime against himself but then suddenly that same -- the same prosecutor's office dropped the charges. the move stunned chicago's mayor and the police superintendent, who weren't made aware of the decision in advance. both were visibly angry at a press conference this afternoon. especially because the police say hundreds and hundreds of hours of manpower were deployed in the investigation because staging a hate crime makes victims of actual hate crimes
reluctant to come forth. wolf blitzer spoke with mayor rahm emmanuel this evening. >> there's no sense of contrite, no sense of remorse. the fact is, wolf, in this act he not only obviously all the resources of the police to investigate and get to the bottom of an alleged hate crime to turned out to be a hoax. the financial problem. but then taking all the notions of what hate crimes and the reason we have those laws on the books-s to protect people of faith, racial background, sexual orientation so they cannot be a victim a crime, a violent crime of any nature because of who they are, what they believe or how they -- who they love. and he used that for his self-promotion. >> smollett's lawyers say he was in fact attacked and that misinformation they say led to a rush to judgment against him. to make matters even more confusing an assistant state attorney says "we did not exonerate him." talk about how unprecedented and frankly confusing this whole
moment is but first our randi kaye on how we got here. >> i gave the description as best as i could. you have to understand also that it's chicago in winter. people can wear ski masks. >> reporter: when actor jussie smollett broke his silence describing the alleged attack against him he was indignant. investigators interviewed hundreds of people and scoured dozens of videos from surveillance cameras but were unable to find any evidence of the attack on camera. these two men seen on camera were brought in for questioning, though, and after 47 hours they confessed to attacking smollett. but here's where things get murky. they told investigators jussie smollett paid them to do it, something smollett has denied. >> who the [ bleep ] would make something like this up or add something to it or whatever it may be? >> reporter: still, police say they had evidence the actor paid two men, brothers, $3,500 to
stage the attack. and gave them money to buy supplies. so despite his very public denials, prosecutors charged smollett with disorderly conduct, accusing him of staging a hate crime. >> smollett directed the brothers' attention toward a surveillance camera on the corner, which he believed would capture the incident. >> reporter: in fact, smollett told investigators it's likely the incident was caught on camera. turns out the 45-second attack was just out of view. officials also say the actor knew the two men he paid in the attack. both did some work on the show "empire" and one provided him with illegal drugs. the men were never charged. smollett meanwhile pleaded not guilty and paid $10,000 bond. >> i'm left hanging my head and asking why. why would anyone, especially an african-american man, use the symbolism of a noose to make false accusations?
>> reporter: soon police say the alleged motive became clear. >> he was dissatisfied with his salary. so he concocted a story about being attacked. >> reporter: same reason why police say the actor sent himself this threatening letter on the set of "empire" just days before the alleged attack. smollett's case seemed to be edging toward trial when suddenly just today charges were dropped. >> do i think justice was served? no. what do i think justice is? i think this city is still owed an apology. >> this is without a doubt a whitewash of justice. mr. smollett is still saying that he is innocent, still running down the chicago police department. how dare him? how dare him? >> reporter: jussie smollett, sticking to his story despite evidence his attack was nothing more than a stunt. >> i've been truthful and consistent on every single level since day one. i would not be my mother's son if i was capable of one drop of
what i've been accused of. >> reporter: randi kaye, cnn, palm beach, florida. >> joining me now cnn legal analyst paul callan and cheryl dorsey a former sergeant with the los angeles police department. paul, does this make any sense to you? they're saying he's exonerated essentially and that's how he's portraying it. but i mean, he did two days of community service i guess and paid a $10,000 fine, which seems to indicate? form of guilt of something, no? >> well, yes, it would. but normally in a case like this you would see a more public admission of responsibility before you just dismiss 16 counts that were handed down by a grand jury. so this is really a bizarre and unusual way to resolve such a serious case. you know, anderson, the reports were that 12 detectives spent over 1,000 hours investigating this case. that's an enormous diversion of resources in chicago, a city
that has suffered from gun violence which has been widely publicized in the past. that's an enormous diversion of police resources and this is really an unusual disposition. >> cheryl, as a former lapd sergeant, how unusual is it for the police superintendent to come out and publicly declare that justice has not been served? >> well, listen, i understand that he's upset and reasonably so. a lot of resources were expended. and listen, at the end of the day there was sufficient evidence for a grand jury to indict. right? and there are things that jussie has not been able to explain. so forever more there will now be an asterisk after his name because there's always going to be that lingering question of why would you seal all of the information relative to this incident unless you wanted to hide evidence of wrongdoing? who pays $10,000 and lets somebody keep it and say let's just call it even steven? this is an example of thes have and the have nots. right now people who look like me are celebrating because
listen, two weeks ago police officers were acquitted for the murder of antwon rose and the deadly -- not deadly but shooting of charles kenzie. so now it feels like for black folks the system is finally working in their favor. now, listen, he didn't kill anybody and this was a minor offense. he won this battle. but i don't think he's going to win the war at the end of the day. >> paul, what do you make of the fact the prosecutor who made the decision to drop the charges says he does not believe smollett is innocent? >> that's right. he has said that this is not an exoneration by any stretch of the imagination. he says basically he compared this case with thousands of other chicago cases where there were reports, false reports to the police, and that this disposition is consistent with those cases. >> so that's the argument, that this was in line with other penalties that -- why seal the
case file? >> well, the case would normally be sealed because any case that gets dismissed is automatically sealed. so that really wasn't unusual, but it does block further inquiry into why they did this. and i think what's also really bizarre about this case, my experience as a prosecutor and defense attorney has always been that when celebrities are involved in charges like this everybody knows the public is watching and you need a transparent handling of the case so that the public knows this guy's being treated fairly even though he is a celebrity. instead you have this secret proceeding where suddenly these charges are dismissed. and frankly i think it does a disservice to future victims of racial harassment and attacks who may not be believed because of allegedly a false claim that's been made in this case. >> cheryl, the prosecutor justified the decision by saying his office prioritizes violent crime, he doesn't see smollett as a threat to public safety. is that a valid reason to not
pursue a case? >> well -- >> well, listen -- >> no. i don't think -- >> i'm sorry, that was for cheryl. cheryl, go ahead. >> i'm sorry. excuse me. go ahead. >> prosecutor has autonomy over what they want to press and what they want to file charges on. so they get to do whatever they want and they can give whatever reason and rationale for doing that. the ball is in their court. and this is why the chicago police department is so upset, because number one, they weren't given advance notice and number two, who overrides the will of a grand jury indict? >> cheryl dorsey -- sorry, paul. very quickly. yeah. >> i wanted to add one thing. i think also the prosecutors botched the case because look at what they did. they let the two men who allegedly attacked him go free. so you have three people involved in a crime. one gets charged, two go free. what happens at the time of trial when they testify at odds to one another? it would be a very difficult case to win. so i think the prosecutors
botched the case when they presented it to the grand jury the way they present td. and this is an easy out for them. >> paul callan, appreciate it. cheryl dorsey as well. as you heard earlier, president trump once again upset about the amount of federal funds earmarked for disaster aid to still suffering puerto rico. coming up i'll talk to the mayor of san juan about what the president is saying now. your manufacturing business.irtf & so this won't happen. because you've made sure this sensor and this machine are integrated. & she can talk to him, & yes... atta, boy. some people assign genders to machines. and you can be sure you won't have any problems. except for the daily theft of your danish. not cool! at&t provides edge to edge intelligence. it can do so much for your business, the list goes on and on. that's the power of &. & this shipment will be delivered... (coughing) need a change of scenery? kayak searches hundreds of travel sites and filters by cabin class, wi-fi and more. so you can be confident you're getting the right flight at the best price.
tto harrison, the wine tcollection.. to craig, this rock. the redwoods to the redheads. the rainbows to the proud. i leave these things to my heirs, all 39 million of you, on one condition. that you do everything in your power to preserve and protect them. with love, california. that's the breaking news
from earlier in the broadcast. at a luncheon with republicans today president trump complained once again about the amount of disaster relief sent to puerto rico in the wake of the devastating storms a year and a half ago. back then you'll recall the president visited the island shortly after hurricane maria struck, met with residents. he drew controversy tossing paper towels to the crowd. last night we reported on a "washington post" account that said the president recently held a separate meeting and asked some of his top aides for ways to cut relief funds to the island. just before air time i spoke with the mayor of san juan, carmen yulin cruz. >> mayor cruz, what's your reaction to the president today complaining to senators that puerto rico is getting too much relief funding and the way it's being spent? >> well, the president continues to show his vindictive behavior toward puerto rico. and he continues to make the humanitarian crisis worse. what we're talking about is a gap of $600 million that is needed to feed puerto rico. so he wants to huff and puff
just like he was king kong, but what he's doing really is he is ensuring that people don't have food to put on the table. he doesn't understand that we're still recuperating from a devastating situation which he made worse, by the way, by just causing a humanitarian crisis. just to give you an idea, anderson, 1.3 million puerto ricans out of 3.2 million that live in the island nation of puerto rico are receiving some sort of nutritional assistance. so that means that about 43% of the population needs this to put food on the table. of that 1.3 million around 45% are children, elderly, or people with severe disabilities. and we continue to hear about the humanitarian crisis and the human crisis that unfolds because the president continues to be too stubborn to do what is right.
>> you talk about what you say was vindictiveness on his part. what do you think is the source of that and how much of this is political, that a number of the states, the relief efforts he's looking at in var states and praising are in red states and puerto rico is not. >> well, it's totally vindictive. and i'll tell you why. on october 4th the president -- 2017 the president came down to puerto rico just for a couple of hours and one of the things that he said at a meeting that i was at was "i hate to tell you, puerto rico, but you've thrown our budget out of whack from all the money that we have thrown down here." and this was only a few weeks after the hurricane. that was the same afternoon where he threw paper towels at people, an image that will forever live in the hearts and minds of people all over the
world. and it does not reflect at all the goodness and the good heart of the american people and the spirit of hundreds of americans that have come down to puerto rico since just to help and to support us beginning a reconstruction. remember something. president trump looked bad in the . eyes of the world. he was not up to par. he didn't do what he was supposed to do. he couldn't get it done because he lacked leadership. so now, rather than looking at himself and seeing what he could have done better, he blames the people of puerto rico. he blames anybody that does not agree with him. now i have a message for the republicans in congress. you don't have to be held hostage to a vindictive behavior from a president that cannot get it done. it's your duty to not let 1.3 million people in puerto rico starve. 3,000 already died because donald trump could not get it done and what i am pleading with
you is not to condemn others to die because it just seems -- and the question for the president is how many deaths -- how many deaths of puerto ricans will be enough for him to do right by us? >> i appreciate talking to you. thank you. >> let's check in with chris and see what he's working on. >> how are you doing, my friend? >> good. >> so we have jussie smollett. what are we going to do? >> what do you make of that? >> they made him a deal. the question is, why? was this about politics or a hole in the case? the prosecutor should have said a lot more and the fact that they're not is suspicious. we're taking it to cuomo's court. we're going to look at what should be obvious and what still needs to be known. the word of the day will be exonerate. the prosecutor went out of their way to say we're not saying he's exonerated. prosecutors don't exonerate people. they're about guilt or not guilt.
why was it used in the mueller report? we'll talk about both but another big issue for us tonight is health care. legally, why is the president doing what he's doing? why are they trying to overturn the aca? and then politically what happens if they're successful when they have nothing to take its place? >> a lot to look forward to. we'll see you then. still ahead, the republican senator's unusual attempt to battle the green new deal using aquaman, the empire strikes back and a bizarre portrait of the late ronald reagan. the ridiculist is next. so, recently my son's band was signed by a record label. while we're on the road, i can keep my parents in the loop with the whole facetime thing. i created a rockstar. (both laughing) (announcer) the best network is even better when you share it. buy the latest iphone and get iphone 10r on us. aww. yaaaayyy!!! aww. yaaaayyy!!! aww. yaaaayyy!!! we hide hotel names, so you can find four star hotels at two star prices. ♪ h-o-t-w-i-r-e
♪hotwire.com each day justin at work... walk. and after work. he does it all with dr. scholl's. only dr. scholl's has massaging gel insoles that provide all-day comfort. to keep him feeling more energized. dr. scholl's. born to move. we're finally going on the trip i've been promising. because with expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. ♪
so even when she outgrows her costume, we'll never outgrow the memory of our adventure together. unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. only when you book with expedia. of non-drowsy claritin... and relief from symptoms caused by over... 200 outdoor and indoor allergens. like those from pollen, pets and dust. because new memories start with dusting off old ones. feel the clarity and live claritin clear.
and talking about political props. i'm talking about giant size posters on the floor of the senate. today it was taken to a new level by mike lee, republican of utah. and possibly jurassic park. >> this is of course a picture of former president ronald reagan, naturally firing a machine gun while riding on the back of a dinosaur. >> a few things, i'm a little concerned that reagan requires both a machine gun and rocket launcher. do you remember hearing that air force one was just a pterodactyl. as for the senator, he was just getting warmed up. >> 1, 2! >> that was gallagher. you might never have thought
you'd see that on cspan but give it a couple of weeks. >> this is a picture of aquaman. a superhero from the undersea kingdom of atlantis. i draw your attention to the 20-foot impressive seahorse he is riding. >> fun fact about aquaman, he's seventh in line to the presidency, right after tramp from "lady and the tramp." you might be asking how many giant posters did he have today? to which i say, how much time do you have? >> these little cows represent the bovine population of america today. on the right is the future population under the green new deal. every cow i spoke to said the same thing. boo. >> this might have played great in the office. i don't know. i'm no gallagher but that punchline needs some work.
he had plenty of other time to win back his audience but from the sounds of the microphone that were picked up it was two guys that wandered in from playing keno. swift reaction came, if this guy can be senator, you can do anything. maybe you can. but can you be a senator and film expert? >> these images are from the documentary film "sharknado 4." he bravely fought the animal off with the tennis racket he keeps by his desk precisely for occasions such as this. >> yeah, i keep a tennis racket around too but it's to get blitzer away from my stash of kahlua. >> the solution to so many of our problems at all times and in all places is to fall in love, get married and have some kids.
>> okay. i love babies. i got no problem with them except they do seem a little judgy. babies are judgy. anyway, there you have it. the props say it all. by the way, did you notice how you felt for the woman whose job it was to keep going along with the senator, and have the next giant, ridiculous thing ready to go? she probably had to practice that and was worried about it. the props said it all. send your regards to aquaman and maybe heckle some cows, ride that dinosaur all the way to bay baby making o'clock on the
ridiculist. that actually happened in our government on capitol hill. now to chris. >> anderson cooper, anti-baby, pro-kahlua. smack wolf away from my stash of kahlua. things i never thought i'd hear at least not tonight but it was good. i am chris cuomo. welcome to "primetime." tonight, the jussie smollett prosecutor is trying to explain a move that has the police and the mayor there fuming. the charges are dropped there but the case is headed straight to cuomo's court. and a new scare for the boeing 737 max 8 jet. this time in the sky over florida. what was it doing in the air in the first place? and the president stomps his victory dance just long enough try to trample all over obamacare. does the law support it and how can you do this with nothing to replace it? one of the president's big