tv CNN Newsroom With Fredricka Whitfield CNN March 30, 2019 11:00am-12:00pm PDT
hello again, thanks for joining me. i'm fredricka whitfield. right now, across the state of texas, democratic presidential hopeful beto o'rourke is rolling out his first official day of campaign rallies. >> i am so glad to be here with you today, in my hometown, my home state, to announce that i'm running to serve you as the next president of the united states of america. >> at the heart of his pitch to voters, immigration, and the crisis unfolding at the border. meanwhile, the president is renewing his threat to close
down the border next week, as homeland security officials say conditions are dire, and resources are strained. cnn correspondent leyla santiago is in el paso. it was a pretty good turnout there in his hometown. and his message was that of inclusion. >> reporter: right, he actually said that he's not going to use what he says president trump uses, which is the effort to divide the country, with rhetoric that he does not believe in. he talked a lot about the need to not let differences define us. but to your point, he really did focus a bit on immigration, as one of his top issues and that's again where we are right now, just half a mile from the southern border. u.s. and mexico, where they meet, talking about what has really become a big headline over the last few days, a lot of families who are now being housed under an international bridge, saying they are humans, too, and we must treat them as
human beings. so immigration certainly a big part of his speech, talking about his hometown, when he was introduced by congresswoman melanica escobar, she called him a son of the border and talked about the importance of coming back to el paso to officially launch his campaign. but remember, he actually announced his bid for the presidency about two weeks ago, via video on social media, and he went straight to those early voting states, iowa, wisconsin, new hampshire, south carolina, and so what we've heard today, was a lot of what we heard over the last few weeks, as he was engaging with voters on issues like immigration, on issues like health care, and climate change is a big one, criminal justice reform, and he said, as president, he would vote for a new voting rights act. he would put one in place. so these are issues that he has
spoken on before. his critics have said that he doesn't have, the clarity on his policies, i was thinking back to a gentleman i spoke to in south carolina, who after beto o'rourke spoke, well, i like him, he identified the problems and now i need him to identify the solutions. >> and then, as he canvasses the rest of texas, or tour other big cities in texas, is he likely to repeat a lot of those messages or perhaps ub fold what some of those solutions might be, or how he sees solutions to some of those problems? >> right, so after here, after he leaves el paso, he will go to houston, and then after houston, he will go to the state capital of austin. what he will be saying in those speeches, the campaign has said, will sort of mimic what we've heard him discuss earlier.
he's talked about the issues that are very important to him. let me let you listen to one of the things he said today. >> we also know that our children and that your children and the generations that follow them are depending on us now at this moment. this is our moment of truth. the challenges before us are the greatest of our lifetimes. we must overcome these challenges, but we must first ask ourselves, how this, the wealthiest, the most powerful country on the face of the planet, the most powerful country that world history has ever known, has found itself in such a perilous position. >> reporter: that's a statement that got a lot of applause here in this crowd. another statement that got a lot of applause, when he talked about the woman's right to choose. so he definitely knew his audience, given that he is on
his home turf. now he heads to houston, and then austin. >> all right, leyla santiago, thank you very much from el paso, texas. and this just in to cnn, as the president threatens to shut down the u.s. border with mexico, next week, we are learning that thousands of migrants could be released into the texas rio grande valley in the coming days. let's check in with cnn's natasha chen at the southern border in front of the hidalgo texas point of entry and what more can you tell us about this? >> reporter: well, fred, we spoke with the brownsville city manager this morning, who has actually been observing migrants being dropped off for about the last two weeks. the city of brownsville and nonprofit partners have already been sifting those people in, assisting those people in trying to get them ticket, bus ticket, plane tickets, to their next destination, so this has been a difficult process, and they're trying to be as helpful as possible, and they got notification, the city manager tells me, that they can expect
about 5900 more migrants being dropped off throughout the valley in the coming days. so that's something that we are speaking to custom and border patrol, border protection about, and now, they also just tweeted, the agency tweeted in the last ten minutes or so, that at least five u.s. customs and border protection facilities are well over 100% capacity, so there is a huge problem here, and a statement, cbp says this is not sustainable. meanwhile, as the president threatens to shut down the border, we're talking to people, as you can see, behind me, who are crossing into mexico, from texas here, people going about to dentist appointments to see their families. here's what a couple of them had to say about a potential border closure. >> once every time i get a chance, so i can go see my dad. he lives over. there he just acquired his visa, but he's only been here three or four times. my kids have barely met their grand daddy.
i haven't even showed him around. and you know, having this border, you know, getting shut down, you know, what am i going to tell my kid, you know what, your grand dad can come over here no more. >> every day, that line sometimes, from people coming from mexico to go to the states can be up to two hours long, just to give you an idea how many people are crossing to go to work. >> reporter: that gentleman you just heard from is from boston, but he lives in mexico with his wife and comes into the u.s. daily for work. he told us he is a trump supporter. he likes the president. but he said if the border is closed, that's going to cause a lot of frustration for his daily life. fred? >> natasha chen, thanks so much. meanwhile, president donald trump says if mexico does not stop all illegal immigration, he could close the border or large sections of it next week, and warns key keep it closed for a long time. >> mexico could stop it, right
at their southern border, it is very easy for them to stop people from coming up and they don't choose to do it. well, we're not going to give them hundreds of billions of dollars and tell them that they're not going to use their strong immigration laws to help the united states. so there is a very good likelihood that i will be closing the border next week. and that will be just fine with me. >> let's go to white house reporter sara westwood in west palm beach, florida, where the president is spending the weekend. what more you can tell us about this threat and if the president is serious about, you know, following that up? >> reporter: well, fred, president trump has long demanded more cooperation with mexico when it comes to stemming the flow of undocumented immigrants over the southern border. but president trump is for the first time attaching a deadline to that threat. it's not the first time that he has said he would close the southern border and not follow through, for example, he did so in december, called on congress to change immigration laws, but nothing ended up happening. and in november, the president did close down one border
crossing, near san diego, temporarily, and business owners in the area did report a great economic impact. just from that one narrow closing. now, we're not sure at this point whether the president is just talking about closing ports of entry or whether he is talking about a broader shutdown of shipments of goods over the u.s./mexico border. that would obviously have a much greater economic impact, the president has offered few specifics about what he means. and he is again calling on congress to change immigration laws, even though obviously we are just a couple of months out of a very contentious shutdown, where democrats and republicans did talk about immigration reform, did talk about border wall funding, and nothing really got done. the president declared a national emergency and congress has failed to override that. and the president's threats to close the southern border come as customs and border patrol are saying that there is an enormous strain on their courses because of the increased flow of undocumented immigrants over the southern border. they say that the detention centers are reaching capacity
and that they are struggling to meet the demands that this increased flow has caused. customs and border patrol says they are on track right now in the months of march to apprehend as many undocumented immigrants for the first time any month since 2008. so they are reaching higher points, with the administration continuing to describe the situation as a crisis. fred? >> sara westwood, thank you so much, from west palm. straight ahead, what could a potential shutdown of the southern border with mexico really mean? and could it strain ties with one of our biggest trade partners? there is this place... it can't be found on just any map. a place miles from the beaten path. overcoming twists and turns, ups and downs.... whatever life throws. a place to always strive for. for all the journeys that make us stronger.
this is the averys trying the hottest new bistro. this is the averys. switch to geico. wait...and the hottest taqueria? and the hottest...what are those? oh, pierogis? and this is the averys wondering if eating out is eating into saving for their first home. this is jc... (team member) welcome to wells fargo, how may i help? (vo) who's here to help with a free financial health conversation, no strings attached. this is the averys with the support they needed to get back on track. well done guys. (team member) this is wells fargo. before the trip, jessica sent 22 texts to a swim instructor to help manny overcome his fear. their gps took them to places out of a storybook.
and they called grandma when manny felt sad about not being able to swim. overall, they shared 176 pictures. but when the moment came, they held their breath, and watched their son learn to believe in himself. welcome back. as democratic presidential hopeful beto o'rourke canvasses across texas, along the border today, fighting for migrants pathway into the cun trirk the president of the united states is digging in. trump is renewing his threat to shut down the southern border if mexico does not step up and stop
illegal immigration. it's not the first time that the president has issued this kind of threat. but has never actually gone through with it. so will this time be different? i want to bring in cnn political commentators anna navarro and john thomas. good to see you both. what is your best guess? why does the president feel he needs to do this? the whole government shutdown over the wall is still in the rearview mirror? is this to get his base all excited? >> certainly that is part of it. i also think that he believes that if he plays hardball with mexico, and with the northern triangle countries, they're going to do more to somehow stop the caravan of migrants. i think he believes that maybe these governments are somehow complicit in what is happening organically at these countries. in addition to threatening to close off the border, he's also announced that he is stopping foreign aid to honduras, el
salvador and guatemala, the northern triangle countries, where most of these migrants are originating from. that is just stupid. ham-handed. short-sighted. it is not going to create less immigrants. it is going to cause more immigrants. you know, i mean we have to understand that these countries are our neighbors. we have a vested interest in making sure, and helping them get out of their crises. look, fred, nobody leaves their country because they want to. people leave their country because they feel they have to. it is either because of fleeing political repression, or political violence, poverty, gang violence, you name it. and if somehow we have to figure out how to be good neighbors, and help that region make it a better place for folks to stay there, and feel that they can stay there safely. >> so john, we've got a couple of different things here.
desperate measures in el salvador, honduras, you know, guatemala and the state department, you know, ending aid there. that on top of the president making threats of closing the border, so who is he trying to appeal to at the risk of potentially losing support of more moderate republicans, you know, heading into this election cycle? why does the president find this is going to be beneficial for him, for his agenda, for this country? >> i think the president is trying to appeal to every american. i mean you just spent the last opening ten minutes of this hour talking about the full-on crisis, fred. i mean you have not just this homeland security secretary, but you have even obama's homeland security jay johnson saying that if, they saw over a thousand migrants a day, their facilities would be overwhelmed, he said we're at 4,000, just as of last week, per day. this is a full-blown crisis. we also know that of these immigrants seeking asylum, that
90% of them are coming through ports of entry. so if the president did shut down some of these ports of entry, he could ease the tensions on some of these facilities. the other thing we know is in places like arizona, they are so overwhelmed at these facilities that they're releasing migrants into the general population, and we know that the majority of these people, once they've been processed, don't come back to their court hearings. so it is a giant mess. and i think it is just like president trump's applying pressure to china, to try to get them to come to the table, i think that's what you have to do to mexico. you have to get them to apply their immigration laws, to help us solve this problem. >> so anna, would you agree with john, that his words, it is a giant mess? >> look, i think it is an issue that needs to be addressed in a aggressive manner. a -- comprehensive manner. and by comprehensive, i think it means border security. it doesn't mean a wall all across the border, but whatever measures need to be taken to be sure that the border is secure.
it also means foreign aid. it means cooperation with these countries. so as to make it safe, where they are. it means things like either people or organizations, like the trump organization, cannot continue to employ undocumented immigrants like they have been doing for decades. it means a whole bunch of things. but closing the border is a real stupid response to this crisis. first of all, donald trump says he wants to build a wall because they're not coming through the ports of entry. but as a punitive measure, he wants to cut off and close the ports of entry. it means devastating economic impact. tourists. goods. workers that go in and out of these country kaly. >> our facilities can't house these people. our facilities are swamped. fred, the interior secretary of mexico just said the mother of
all caravans is coming up from honduras. mexico can stop these people at their southern border, but they have no incentive right now, because america hasn't stuck to them economically. >> and what are they going to do about the economic goods? >> we have a free trade agreement with mexico. what are you going to do about the goods that flow in and out of the boarder. >> and $1.9 billion a day. >> and the workers who flow in and oust border on a daily basis. and the tourists who flow in and out of the border on a daily basis. >> you assume we cut off all goods and just shutting down a few ports of entries doesn't shut down all goods. >> why not? shutting down the ports, how are they going to pick and choose -- >> are you saying the administration might pick and choose about what could cross? when the president says shut it down, the inference is shutting it down closes everybody. both ways. >> we don't know the specific plan. we will probably hear that on monday or tuesday, but it might mean select ports where a lot of
these migrants are coming through. what we know is that we don't want kids stuck in cages again. and that happens when facilities are overwhelmed and we can't handle these people. and it is not fair just to release them in the general population. this problem has reached full crisis magnitude, and we got to do something to fix. it and i think mexico has to help. and right now, they're not doing it on their own volition. so if we don't step it up and hurt them economically, i don't know what else to do. >> anna? last word? is that the only recourse? i mean the only recourse is that people will continue to be, you know, in cages -- >> only somebody that perhaps has never seen the flow between the borders would be able to sustain and defend a position like that. i've been to el paso. i've been to the border. it's not just migrants. it's an entire economic ecosystem that survives on border crossings daily. if donald trump wants to go ahead and shut off the border,
maybe, i don't know, maybe the goods will come on the backs of flying dragons like on game of thrones. i have no idea what he's got in mind. but if he wants to do this, i think the effects, and the impact on the lives of people on the border, and on all americans, wait until you can't get your avocados for your cinco de mayo guacamole, folks. wait for that. and let's see what the effects are going to be. >> we have bigger problems than cinco de mayo guacamole. that's the problem here. >> we will leave it there. thank you very much. coming up, charges dropped against actor jussie smollett in chicago. and the prosecutor in the case is now defending her decision. after months of wearing only a tiger costume,
we're finally going on the trip i've been promising. because with expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. ♪ so even when she outgrows her costume, we'll never outgrow the memory of our adventure together. unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. only when you book with expedia. dad! dad!! can you drive me to jessica's house? ♪
at northwestern mutual, this is what our version of financial planning looks like. tomorrow is important, but so is making the most of the house before they're out of the house. spend your life living. find an advisor at northwesternmutual.com. you're smart,eat you already knew that. but it's also great for finding the perfect used car. you'll see what a fair price is and you can connect with a truecar certified dealer. now you're even smarter. this is truecar.
all of you. how you live, what you love. that's what inspired us to create america's most advanced internet. internet that puts you in charge. that protects what's important. it handles everything, and reaches everywhere. this is beyond wifi, this is xfi. simple. easy. awesome. xfinity, the future of awesome.
a no show for actor jussie smollett at the naacp image award dinner last night. he did not win the supporting acting category in which he was a nominee. will he show up for the televised live event tonight? meantime, days after chicago prosecutors dropped the charges against empire, the empire actor, now the prosecutors defending a decision. cook county attorney kim fox is defending her decision to drop the charges, in an op-ed in the chicago tribune, she also says she welcomes an independent nonpolitical review of the case, and suggests prosecutors might not have won the case in court if they were to proceed. she writes, quote, in determining whether or not to pursue charges prosecutors are
required to balance the severity of the crime against the likelihood of securing a conviction. for a variety of reasons, including public statements made about the evidence in the case, my office believed the likelihood of securing a conviction was not certain. end quote. former president of the naacp, and civil rights attorney cornell brooks, joining me now from new haven, connecticut, good to see you. so kim fox's op-ed appears to really contradict her earlier statements, you know, that whether or not her office would have won a conviction. what do you suppose is really behind why they dropped it? >> well, i think they were probably grappling with the fact that you have a very popular actor, whose career was im paralleled and as a consequence, already suffering some professional punishment, and so they might be a real question as to whether or not they could secure a conviction.
and that may have played into her decision. she would be the first prosecutor to think about those kinds of things, she wouldn't be the first prosecutor to think about those kinds of things, and as she notes this is a relatively low level felony, so it is not unheard of for a defendant to engage in community service, and unusual to essentially forfeit the bond -- >> and in part, she wrote about that, that the other key factor was that this was a class four felony, and usually in cases like this, there might be, especially when you have a client, or, you know, a defendant who has no prior criminal record, that there may be community service, or there may be some monetary penalties, but then the city, the city's mayor said cough up $125,000, the amount of money that went into, in part, the amount of money into the resources dedicated to this case. why wouldn't there have been
that kind of deal, you know, or condition dropping all of these charges and throwing in that $125,000, as opposed to just the $10,000 bail. >> right. that's right. that would not, that would not have been an unreasonable request by a prosecutor. but the challenge here is with the charges, were dropped, he forfeits the initial payment, that would look like an admission of guilt. i can imagine a defense attorney not wanting to do that. but listen to this. in terms of position of the police department and the mayor, there needs to be some more proporti proportionality and hypocrisy here and the city is out for the cost of the investigation but paid the better part of a billion in terms of police
misconduct settlements, so the city does not need to essentially strain at the neck and swallow a camel here. the reality is, this is a city that has a long ugly history in terms of police misconduct. this is not a great development, but the mayor really needs to focus on who perpetrated a crime against lakwon mcdonald and what caused him to lose his life. >> the prosecutor has not been exonerated, and he has not been found innocence, and overall in a case like this, 16 charges being dropped, how does this impact other race-related hate-related, you know, allegations, criminal conduct? do you see that this case has
long-lasting effects, impacted other cases that are like this? >> unless we are making up our minds as a country to bury our heads in the sand, the fact of the matter is, we've seen hate crime rise, each over the last two years, 1%, most recently, 17% most recently and hate crime rise across all categories. we need not engage in denial as a country because of one case where we have an allegation of a hate crime hoax. this is aberrational. it is exceptional. it does nothing, nothing, to prove that these kinds of crimes don't happen on a regular basis. in other words, where we have people being assassinated, in synagogues, where we had people being beaten up on the street, one actor engaged in foolish conduct does not in any way distract from a real problem in
this country, and as attested to by the southern poverty law center, the adl, the naacp, and a whole host of civil rights and human rights organizations. so hate crime is a problem, not hate crime hoaxes. >> cornell brooks, always a pleasure to have you. thank you so much. still ahead, president trump is nominating his former economic adviser steven moore to the federal reserve board of governors. we'll talk to steven moore next. hey mercedes, how about letting your hair down a little? how about a car for people who don't play golf? hey mercedes! mix it up a little. how about something for a guy who doesn't want a corner office? hey mercedes, i don't even own a tie. do you think i need a mahogany dashboard? hey mercedes, can you make it a little cooler in here? [ a-class ] i am setting the temperature [ a-class ] to 68 degrees. we hear you. we made a car that does, too. the all-new a-class. all-new thinking starting at $32,500.
so, recently my son's band was signed by a record label. while we're on the road, i can keep my parents in the loop with the whole facetime thing. i created a rockstar. (both laughing) (announcer) the best network is even better when you share it. buy the latest iphone and get iphone 10r on us. (woman) too late for lunch.o minutes. starkist saves the day. sweet and spicy tuna in a pouch! smart choice, charlie. (charlie) no drain, no pain. just tear, eat... and go! try all of my tuna, salmon and chicken pouches.
the department of housing and urban development is charging facebook with violating the fair housing act. hud claims the social media giant is violating the federal act by encouraging, enabling, and causing housing discrimination through its advertising platform. here's cnn's christina lessu. >> fredricka, the department of
housing and urban development is accusing facebook of enabling housing discrimination, claiming that advertisers can dictate which users see housing related ads, based on race, religion, sex and disability, and to be clear, this is not a new accusation against facebook. just last week, it settled a lawsuit that made similar allegations. the company says it was taking steps to address the concerns. for example, facebook announced it would separate housing, employment, and credit card ads on a separate portal and that portal would limit advertiser's ability to target people based on those discriminatory factors. the government wants answers from other tech companies, specifically google and twit ber their advertising tools. to be clear, the department of housing and urban development is not investigating those companies. >> as for facebook, it claims it was caught offguard by the hud charges because it has been working with hud to address its concern. here is the problem for facebook. this is yet another story about
users or advertisers potentially misusing the platform. remember, the company has been criticized for a host of issues, including enabling the spread of terrorist propaganda. now, consumers and regulators are now left to wonder whether facebook is actually doing enough to police its own platform. >> thank you so much. let's talk about this with our brilliant legal guys. thanks for sticking around. i know we have had you all over the map today on these hours, so sorry about that. >> no problem. >> ready to go. >> here we go. civil rights attorney and law professor and richard herman, criminal defense attorney and law professor. avery, let me start with you. does it appear that hud has a strong legal case, that facebook is intentionally engaging in housing discrimination by targeting or limiting who sees what housing ads? >> fredricka, this will be the largest hud prosecutor fair housing case in american
history. interestingly enough, the heavy lifting was done by the private fair housing organizations, and very capable lawyers representing them, which settled in federal district court new york last week. hud brought suit and facebook, saying what are you suing us now for? well, the answer is hud can exact what are called civil penalties, at 15,000 dollars a violation, times hundreds of thousands of ads, times each day, that could be billions of dollars. so this is a major league full frontal attack on hud for housing discrimination, and you know what? i think they've got a shot. >> rrl? richard, something tells me you do not because i saw your head drop with nope, i don't buy it. >> his head always drops. >> it's reflex when avery talks. it is just a reflex. it goes down. >> stop it. >> pay attention. pay attention. >> how do you see this? >> listen, this is civil, it's
not criminal, so let's understand that. and facebook has been working with hud the last two years to remedy this, and they are making changes. and they basically acknowledged there were problems in mining certain personal data from their subscribers, and you know, when you put that news feed on, when it comes on, in facebook, the information you see, not everybody sees, so what, those are the allegations, that facebook mines this data and sold it to advertisers who then used it to target certain individuals, and there by, it excluded people based on race. so that's the main claim here, and facebook is looking to change their system, overhaul it, make sure that doesn't happen again, and ensure it doesn't happen again. it goes through an administrative law judge who has to make an determination, fred, whether or not there was actual discrimination, and then if there was, what parties were injured? what was the injury per person? >> that was going to be my
question. hud now has to establish how this depravity, you know, if that's indeed the case, how this really injures, harms, all of these facebook users, and can they do that? >> that's why you're brilliant, fred. you just hit it on the head. >> i learned it from you guys. >> but you're right. >> how will they do that? how will hud try to establish that, richard? >> i'm going to hear avery, because he's got this, this is the biggest case in the history of the world here. >> i'm looking at -- >> avery, how are they going to do that? >> all right. here's the truth. the difficulty is they have to identify the individuals who have been affected by discrimination. which means they've got to go through literally millions of advertising, they have to find out who was using the service, but again, remember, the big money here isn't going to be damages, fredricka, it is going to be the so-called civil fine
of $50,000 per violation. that's why this case is so huge. the private fair housing organizations won their case by settlement, by consent order, and things are changing. fair housing and lawyers are now working over at facebook, helping them to make the changes. but in terms of the cost, this is a test of hud. the civil rights community has never trusted hud. this is the big one here. civil fines of at least a billion dollars, let's see if they can put their money where their mouth is. >> fred, facebook was working, facebook has been working with hud to remedy this for two years. all of a sudden, last week, hud says give us all your subscribers and all their information. >> you're reading my mind because that was going to be my follow-up question. wait a minute, if they have been working together, why now have they been hit with -- >> they haven't been working together. they have been working with the private fair housing groups. >> it broke, fred, because they asked for all of the in foe data
on all of the subscribers and facebook said we're not going to give you that and therefore, they filed this litigation here. and for years, fred, the tech companies -- >> if they're not going to give it, we will sue for it. >> yes. and the administrative law judge will resolve that dispute. >> okay. >> for years, tech companies have him community. the interesting thing here is the d.o.j. is saying no, now the fair housing act control, supersedes, and that's why they're going to, facebook is having a problem right now. this will be resolved, fred. there will be ultimately, there will be a settlement here, i believe. >> it is fascinating. very complicated but fascinating and made that much more fascinating because of you. >> love the case. >> okay, fred. >> okay. >> appreciate it. thank you so much. >> see you soon. we'll be right back. there is this place... it can't be found on just any map. a place miles from the beaten path. overcoming twists and turns, ups and downs....
nick's mom called the t-ball league eight times to help her shy son make some new friends. his parents shared videos of highlights, dance moves, and jimmy carlyle stealing third... almost. they sent seven texts when a new friend invited nick for a play date. but in the end, they put their phones down, and watched as nick finally felt part of the team. how's your cough? i'm good. i took 12-hour mucinex and sent it far away. hey buddy, have you seen a nice woman with a cough?
president trump is nominating his former economic adviser, stephen moore, to the federal reserve board of governors. moore helped draft trump's tax proposals in the 2016 election campaign. and has written a book on the president's economic agenda. moore has backed trump's criticism of the president's own appointee to the fed for raising interest rates and phasing criticism however including a former head of the council of economic advisers who wrote an open letter to u.s. senators urging them to reject the nomination and questioning if moore is qualified.
stephen moore, who is also a former cnn economic analyst, so a very familiar face around here, joining me right now. so stephen, congratulations on the nomination, but at the same time, this must feel very awkward, because you are also referring this criticism from some in the economic arena. so how do you respond to the critics who say your background doesn't qualify you to be, you know, on the board of governors? to have this job? >> by the way, it is great to be with you, fredricka. thanks for having me on. it was quite an honor to be asked by the president a week and a half ago, to serve on the federal reserve board, it really is amazing, i still have goose bumps from that, from that call, and it is true, i'm not a ph.d. economist, but i have 35 years of policy experience in the economics arena. i've been the chief economist at the heritage foundation, the most important think tank in the world. i was the senior economic editor at "the wall street journal,"
and have done many things, and by the way, as you said, i helped write the tax plan that president trump put forward last year, we're very proud of that. it is true, i'm not a ph.d. economist. and my point would be maybe we don't need so many ph.d. economists over there at the fed. i think it would be a good thing not just to have, other people besides economist, businessmen, people who know things about the real world, and so i don't think being, you know, a ph.d. economist should be a necessarily qualification for serving on the fed. >> so some of those critics are worried about your loyalties, whether you are going to be driven by your loyalty to the president of the united states, or if your loyalty is to the u.s. economy. how do you answer that? >> that's an easy one. look, i love donald trump, and i've worked with him because i believe in most of what he is doing, i've had some run-ins with donald trump over the last couple of years, i think he's done a phenomenal job on the economy, i'm with the 71% of americans according to that cnn poll that think that the economy is really headed in a very positive direction.
and so but look, my objective, when i get over to the fed is, to help chairman powell pursue the policies that will grow this economy, provide high wages, a lot of jobs, and stable prices. and i don't think that's too controversial. there will obl , obviously be disagreements with economists as there are all the time as the best way to achieve, that and i happen to be a person who believes we should try to keep prices stable, because that will maximize economic growth, and raise wages for the american worker. >> so you were pretty critical, right, of the fed during the obama administration. >> i was. >> keeping interest rates low, warning it could cause, you know, run-away inflation, but now, you are supporting the president's call for lower interest rates, i know you just now said stabilizing, but the president calling for lower interest rates, so how do you square that? what's exchanged? >> first of all, look, i think i have been, most people have woo say i have been pretty right
about the last four months, my criticism of the fed, i think chairman powell is doing a very good job but i think the last two actions were questionable. you go back to last summer, fredricka, we had achieved near 4% economic growth which is a great prosperous level of growth, we had full employment in the economy, and we have zero inflation. and you know, what's wrong with that picture? nothing. it is a beautiful picture. and then the fed started raising rates, and taking, sucking some of the oxygen out of that economy, and i was critical of that. especially in december, remember a week before christmas, the fed raised interest rates again, and the dow jones plummeted, the stock market went through a violent contraction, and i spoke out, very angrily about that and i think i was proven right, because unfortunately, two or three days after christmas, the fed actually had to pull back its action, because it had such a negative effect. so i wish they had listened to me in the first place on that one. >> how do you prepare yourself
for, you know, the potential grilling? >> right. you know, it looks like, you know, given what i've been through over the last week or two, look, i just want -- >> this may have been a prelude. >> right, exactly. so my only thing is i love conversations like this, where we're talking about the economy, what we do, and obviously, there are going to be disagreements, as i have been on cnn for the last two years, so i know about those. but let's keep it on the economy. i think a lost the personal insults are, you know, are counter-productive, and hurtful, and i don't think they lead to any positive results about how we get this economy to continue to be prosperous, which i think we all want. >> there are many who perhaps might think you should give the president advice on that, he may not go there with you because you're a nominee but he does go there with other people. >> i've been on this show with you many times, look, i would say 75% of the time i agree with donald trump, i give him high marks for his handling of the economy, but there are many times i disagree with him, on
pro-trade, more pro free trade than he is and probably a little more pro immigration than he, is i will be an independent mind for growth with the american worker. how's that? >> that's a pretty good answer. stephen moore, congratulations, and good luck. and thanks for being with us. >> thank you. so just when you think you have seen it all, in politics, two swamp creatures show up in a senate confirmation hearing, no joke, take a look as interior secretary nominee david bernhard answers questions during the confirmation hearing and a woman seen sitting behind him in view of the cameras ducks down and re-emerges, wearing, ye, a green swamp monster mask. it turns out it was a coordinated demonstration by environmental groups to protest his nomination. the protesters were not escorted out until nearly two hours into the meeting. now you've seen it all. tomorrow night, find out the answer to the question, who is
tricky dick, exploring richard nixon's rise, fall, incredible comeback and political destruction, featuring never before seen footage. tricky dick continues tomorrow night, 9:00 eastern, only on cnn. and thank you so much for being with me today. i'm fredricka whitfield. see you back here tomorrow. so much more straight ahead in the newsroom with anna cabrera, right after this. ♪ you should be mad they gave this guy a promotion. you should be mad at forced camaraderie. and you should be mad at tech that makes things worse. but you're not mad, because you have e*trade, who's tech makes life easier by automatically adding technical patterns on charts and helping you understand what they mean. don't get mad. get e*trade's simplified technical analysis.
with neulasta onpro? strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. if you'd rather be home, ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card.
it is 3:00 eastern, noon out west, live in the cnn newsroom, i'm ana cabrera in new york. on the southern border of the united states right now, customs and immigration officials say the breaking point that they've been expecting is completely upon them now. in texas and arizona and new mexico, processing centers, migrant family