tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN July 9, 2019 3:00pm-4:00pm PDT
warns against committing a sin. and on the outs. the president insults the british ambassador to the united states once again. still smarting after learning that the diplomat called him incompetent. this hour i'll ask a former uk ambassador if america's special relationship with britain can be repaired. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." this is cnn breaking news. breaking news this hour. a federal judge in new york says no to the trump administration in its fight to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. the judge refusing to allow the justice department to switch out its legal team in the case. also tonight, president trump is praising his labor secretary as top democrats are ramping up their demands for alex acosta to resign. acosta's under fire for his role in a 2008 plea deal for
multimillionaire jeffrey epstein who is now charged with sexually abusing dozens of underage girls. acosta's definitiending his act as a top prosecutor in florida while calling epstein's alleged crimes horrific. also tonight, president trump is doubling down on his attacks to the british ambassador to the united states, calling him whacky and a very stupid guy. this hour i'll talk to democratic presidential candidate, washington governor jay inslee and our correspondents and analysts are standing by. let's go to jessica schneider and our legal analyst laura coates. jessica, why did this judge deny the justice department's request to switch its legal team in the census case? >> wolf, this is a biting order from this new york federal judge, jesse fuhrman. in his three-page order, he goes into detail, really slamming the justice department for making this request to withdraw certain
attorneys that have been representing them in this census case up until this point and asking to substitute these lawyers. this judge saying that the department of justice did not give any satisfactory reasons for changing these attorneys and, in fact, gave no reason at all for changing these attorneys and that's why the judge in this case has denied this request to change these attorneys. and, wolf, this is a big procedural setback for the department of justice. their plan has been multi-fasciated. they're attacking this census case to put this citizenship question on the 2020 census on multiple levels. they are fighting this in courts across the country. federal courts in maryland, new york and california. they're also possibly working with the president on what could be a memorandum or an executive order. so this is a major defeat as it pertains to the court track. they are not allowed in this new york case to substitute these attorneys. the judge really coming down on the department of justice, denying this request and saying
-- and actually putting the onus on these individual attorneys at the department of justice, saying you have to come to us with sworn affidavits talking about this case. this is really a huge blow for the department of justice and tonight they're so far declining to comment. >> it's a significant blow, indeed. and, laura, the federal judge, jesse fuhrman writes. i'll quote specifically. "defendants provide no reasons let alone satisfactory reasons for the substitution of counsel." >> it's almost as if they believe that questions that justify their conduct are all rhetorical, which we know is not the case. there is a reason they're asking the justice department, first of all, why do you want it on the census in the first place? remember the word contrived when it came to the supreme court? listen -- this is what the administration has said but it's totally contrived. you haven't offered a substantiated, valid reason that isn't politically motivated in some shape or form. even have it be a benign response. again, they treat it as if there
is no real need to justify our conduct. remember, courts want their dockets to keep on moving. they don't want unnecessary delays. they do not want to have to have new counsel get up to speed. delaying hearings. delaying trials if there are any. delaying motion practices at any time. they want to have things keep going. and, remember, it was the commerce secretary who said in the first place time was of the essence. they had to print all these things. to add this wrench to the plan saying, we're going to delay it, we want new counsel, we're not going to tell you why, that shouldn't be good enough. >> remind us, jessica, why the department of justice wanted to change out the legal team to begin with. the legal team was work. they came up with a decision based on what the attorney general told them to do and all of a sudden the president says something totally different. >> right. well, the judge in this case also wants to know why the department of justice suddenly wanted to change its lawyers. the department of justice hasn't told the courts why they want to make this change and they haven't told the public either. there's been speculation that
because these group of attorneys who were working on this census case for the past few months, they had represented to the court, as laura said, that time was of the essence. they consistently talked about this july 1st printing deadline that the census had to move forward and now all of a sudden they go back to the court and say, oh, never mind, we have some real time here. that really presents a credibility issue. and perhaps to alleviate that, that's why the department of justice wanted to change up their team of lawyers so their wouldn't be this issue when they go before the judge. but before the judge, and to the public, the department of justice has not yet explained why they needed this change, ands that exactly why this judge is saying you can't make this change. you haven't given satisfactory reasons. in fact, you haven't given any reasons for making this change. >> the bottom line, at least for now, another major setback to the president who wants this citizenship question asked in the 2020 census. guys, stand by. we're going to get a lot more on this. the breaking news that we're following. i want to bring in our chief
white house correspondent jim acosta. jim, that census citizenship question clearly very, very important to the president and this judge's ruling clearly a major setback into that's right, wolf. this is a setback for the president, no question about it. he has been tweeting about it. he's been talking about it. he hasn't reacted to the latest development in the case. facing calls to resign over his handling of the jeffrey epstein case. the president says secretary alex acosta is doing a fantastic job as he put it earlier today. mr. trump also tried to distance himself from epstein in the overrule office earlioval office earlier today after describing epstein as a "terrific guy." tonight president trump appears to be standing by his embattled labor secretary alex acosta, at least for now. >> i can tell you that for 2 1/2 years he's been just an excellent secretary of labor. he's done a fantastic job. >> reporter: the president appeared to diminish acosta's
role as a federal prosecutor in a 2008 plea agreement for multiple millionaire jeffrey epstein who is facing new charges of running a child sex ring in florida that includes accusations of abusing teenage girls. >> i do hear that there were a lot of people involved in that decision, not just him. i can only say this, from what i know and what i do know is that he's been a great -- really great secretary of labor. the rest of it we'll have to look at. we'll have to look at it very carefully. >> reporter: the president also downplayed his own relationship with epstein. >> well, i knew him like everybody in palm beach knew him. he was a fixture in palm beach. i had a falling out with him a long time ago. i don't think i've spoken to him for 15 years. i wasn't a fan. so i feel very badly actually for secretary acosta because i've known him as being somebody that works so hard and has done such a good job. i feel very badly about that whole situation. >> reporter: but that's not the whole story. back in 2002, the president told
"new york" magazine "i've known jeff for 15 years. terrific guy. he's a lot of fun to be with. it is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as i do, and many of them are on the younger side. no doubt about it, jeffrey enjoys his social life." democrats are accusing the secretary of shielding epstein from a tougher sentence. >> i am calling on secretary acosta to resign. it is now impossible for anyone to have confidence in secretary acosta's ability to lead the department of labor. if he refuses to resign, president trump should fire him. >> i'm not surprised he knew about this when he nominated him for the cabinet. just goes to show you. >> reporter: secretary acosta tweeted in his own defense saying the crimes committed by epstein are horrific and i'm pleased that new york prosecutors are moving forward with a case based on new evidence. republicans say they're awaiting more information. >> there is nothing new. that we didn't know before he
was confirmed by the senate. >> as to secretary acosta's continued service, we serves at the pleasure of the president, and i'm inclined to defer to the president to make that decision. >> i don't know enough about it to say anything. >> reporter: the president is continuing to lash out at britain's ambassador to the u.s., kim darroch, over his recently exposed criticism of mr. trump who is still railing against prime minister theresa may's handling of brexit. the president tweeted the whacky ambassador that the uk foisted upon the united states is not someone we are thrilled with. a very stupid guy. i told theresa may how to do that deal but she went her own foolish way. was unable to get it done. a disaster. >> many people accuse the president of meddling and it was none of his business, but it turns out he was right. >> now, away from those controversies, a crucial debate played out at an appeals court earlier in the day over the future of obamacare. the republican-appointed judges on that appeals court suggested that obamacare which protects
people with pre-existing conditions may no longer be constitutional after president trump and gop lawmakers stripped out the individual mandate from that law. all of that means another critical obamacare case could be heading back to the supreme court just in time for the 2020 election. a very important case, wolf. >> indeed. critically important. thanks very much for that, jim acosta. joining us now, democratic presidential candidate, the governor of washington state, jay inslee. governor, thanks very much for coming in. >> thank you. >> a lot to discuss. first, i want to get your reaction to the breaking news we just reported, this federal judge in new york blocking the trump administration's attempt to put a new legal team in place to deal with this very sensitive issue of whether or not a citizenship question should be asked in the 2020 census. what's your reaction? >> well, the president got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. it is clear that this was a sham excuse to try to put this question on the ballot. it is clear that racial bias is involved in this. i'm glad this is one of the cases we filed.
we've now beat donald trump 22 times in a row. >> when you say we, you mean washington state. >> washington state. bob ferguson, our a.g., has done a great job. i think the federal court had a belly full of being deceived and told lies bit attorneys who represented the commander of lies right now and that's donald trump. >> you don't want a citizenship question to be asked as part of the census? >> there is no reason to do this whatsoever. it clearly was intended to suppress the par tsa paticipati people who don't look like donald trump. it's infected his administration. it's sad to say but it's true. >> let's get to another sensitive issue. the labor secretary alex acosta. many of your democratic presidential candidates and a lot of democrats in congress, they're demanding that he resign because of the way he treated jeffrey epstein. more than a decade ago when he was the u.s. attorney in south florida. what do you think? >> well, i heard the president say that the secretary is a terrific guy.
well, i tell you terrific guys don't give sweetheart deals to sex offenders because they're a billionaire and that's what happened here, and, unfortunately, this is a continuation of a pattern in this administration. this isn't just a onoff offense. this administration is of billionaires, by billionaires and for billionaires. this is just another incident of demonstrating that. this roegue's cabinegallery of members. he needs to go. >> so you're joining the other democratic candidates? >> you bet. >> you want him to resign. >> he should resign. >> if he doesn't resign, you want the president to fire him? >> yes. >> what if the president doesn't fire him and he doesn't resign? >> there's other means. i don't know if impeachment is appropriate or not, but one way or not, this guy should go. the president said he's going to bring us the best people, he's brought us the worst.
look at the environmental issues where the president tried to cover up his horrendous environmental record yesterday, which he knows he's very weak on and exposed. he appointed interior and epa people who woke up every day to say what can we do to help billionaires make the skies dirtier. these people need to go. >> let's talk about health care which is a critically important issue, as you know. the trump administration was in federal court today arguing against the affordable care act saying it should be invalided. the potential implications if it goes to the supreme court, which it almost certainly will, will be critically important for millions of americans who have come to rely on pre-existing conditions, the affordable care act. >> people need to dig deep to understand how callously indifferent this man in the white house is to the health needs of americans. it's really difficult to imagine a person who would commit themselves to take away health insurance from 20 million americans. 800,000 in my state. but that's exactly what he's trying to do. and that may shock people, but
that is the situation. he has no way to replace obamacare. he has no intention of replacing obamacare. this is a callous indifference to suffering americans. i talked to a friend who had a mastectomy yesterday. to think there is a president of the united states trying to take away health insurance from women who want to have a mastectomy, that's infuriating and it should infuriate people. we need a new president. >> as governor of washington state, you just signed into law government health insurance plan that competes with private health insurance right now. is that a model of something you would like to see down the road nationally? >> yes, we did. i was proud to be the first govern tore sign a public option bill in united states history. it is a step forward. it's not the ultimate step. we need to continue to get actual universal health care in this country, but it is important because we have set a template for other states to follow now. even without federal action. where we can provide a state-sanctioned care system for people in my state. i hope others will follow us.
>> let me get your reaction to the president's environment -- environmental speech yesterday. i don't know if you read it or if you heard it, but he said he has now given the country, in his words, a clear direction to focus on environmental challenges. this is a signature issue for you. >> well, look, donald trump is for environmentalism like he is for feminism, basically. he has the worst record of any perhaps politician maybe in world history. we don't know. but i think this is really interesting. i haven't heard other people comment about this. i think what donald trump did yesterday was to demonstrate a path to victory to defeat him because he understood by going out and just trying to cover up his tracks on this horrendous environmental record, he's demonstrated how weak and exposed he is. look, the polling shows this is his weakest point in americans. we now need to drive this message home. we should attack his weakest link with our strongest candidate, someone who is going to make defeating climate change
the number one priority. that's my advocacy in my campaign. let's attack him where he is weakest. it is on the environmental policy. people want clean air and clean water and they want to defeat the climate crisis. that is a tremendous way to defeat this man and make him a flip in history. >> governor instantly, thank you very much for coming in. there is more breaking news just ahead. what does a federal judge's new ruling mean for the president's fight to add that citizenship question to the u.s. census. and did the labor secretary alex acosta give alleged sex trafficker jeffrey epstein too lenient a deal as democrats now claim? former u.s. attorney, preet bharara, there you see him. he's standing by live. it never questions the tasks at hand. but this year, there's a more thrilling path to follow. (father) kids... ...change of plans! (vo) defy the laws of human nature...
...at the summer of audi sales event get exceptional offers now! here's another reason to join t-mobile. unlimited data with taxes and fees included. no surprises on your bill. and here's another reason to join. bring in your discount, and we'll match it. that's right, t-mobile will match your discount. (annthe following moment for of relaxation with busy and hectic lives, is brought to you by
colonial penn life insurance company. living insurance for them and for you. (birds chirping) living insurance for them and for you. learn more by visiting us online at livinginsurance.com. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.
today's senior living communities have never been better, with amazing amenities like movie theaters, exercise rooms and swimming pools, public cafes, bars and bistros even pet care services. and there's never been an easier way to get great advice. a place for mom is a free service that pairs you with a local advisor to help you sort through your options and find a perfect place. a place for mom. you know your family we know senior living. together we'll make the right choice. at visionworks, we guaranteand look great.eat "guarantee". we say that too. you gotta use "these" because we don't mean it. if you don't love your glasses, we'll make it right. guaranteed. visionworks. see the difference. hmm. exactly. and doug. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance,
so you only pay for what you need. nice. but, uh... what's up with your... partner? oh. well, we just spend all day telling everyone how we customize car insurance, because no two people are alike, so... limu gets a little confused when he sees another bird that looks exactly like him. [ loud crash ] yeah. he'll figure it out. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ book two, separate qualifying stays at choicehotels.com... ...and earn a $50 gift card. because when your business is rewarding yourself... ...our business is you. book direct at choicehotels.com when i needed to create a better visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics. yeah, and now business is rolling in. get started at fastsigns.com.
we're following breaking news on the president's controversial battle to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census. a federal judge in new york refusing to allow the justice department to swap out its legal team in the case. that decision just announced. let's bring in cnn's senior legal analyst preet bharara. he's the former u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york. so, preet, what does this mean for the president's quest to include a citizenship question on the census? >> well, it doesn't help that effort. we all sat around the television and the newspapers last week under the impression that that fight was over because the supreme court made a ruling saying that you can't add a citizenship question on the basis of a pretext. and now you have a series of lawyers who decided for whatever reason that they don't want to be on the case anymore and
that's what people have suspected about this. and judge fuhrman, who is a very good judge, i know him, he's a smart guy and he doesn't take any nonsense. he's not going to let the case proceed unless he understands under oath the reasons why these lawyers have decided to remove themselves from the case or if they were removed by other folks. so it slows things down. it also, i think, sends a signal to other lawyers in the department who are career officials who care about their reputations that they can't just make arguments that violate their conscience and undermine their credibility. so overall i think it's a good thing for understanding transparency and sending a good signal to the justice department. >> so it's not enough for the president -- the president of the united states to overrule the attorney general, the commerce secretary and say, i don't care what you guys think, i want this to take place, i want that citizenship question asked in the aftermath of the supreme court decision? that's not a good enough reason? >> yeah, i don't think so. what i'm talking about here is with respect to this particular ongoing case that has proceedings still pending, it
sets the president's goal back. presumably the president could do some other thing and order folks to add a question or have an addendum. a executive order. all of those options have been discussed. all of those will invite litigation as well and will require lawyers from the justice department to defend i think really, really poor reasons and pretextual reasons. those will be separate from this proceeding, but i think overall it's not good for the president and shouldn't be good for the president on these grounds. >> let's turn to the new charges brought by your former office, the southern district of new york, against multimillionaire jeffrey epstein. labor secretary alex acosta is facing a lot of scrutiny for his role in the 2008 plea deal down in florida. acosta says this time is different thanks to new evidence and additional testimony. is it accurate to imply that the evidence wasn't strong back in 2008 to fight this in court? >> so he talks about new evidence. i don't know how much new
evidence there is. apparently some because the southern district itself reports that they conducted searches and found what appears to be child pornography at the home of jeffrey epstein. they also may have found additional witnesses to talk about conduct that happened in new york as opposed to florida, but what seems to me from being an outsider looking at this, what's really new is the evidence brought to bear from the miami newspaper that made it clear the way in which the resolution happened in florida with alex acosta at the head of the u.s. attorney's office was done in a very strange, arguably, potentially corrupt way. i was u.s. attorney for 7 1/2 years in my own district and i never once had a meeting, ever, not withstanding -- not even off campus, but defense counsel in any case, not to mention a high-profile case without the team there and negotiated personally a resolution, which looks like what happened here. i think alex acosta has to answer a lot of questions why it was resolved that way and what his reasons were and what he based his decision on. >> the u.s. attorney in the southern district of new york
cited the excellent reporter by the "miami herald" over these past many, many months. a lot of speculation, preet, and i need your expertise on this, why this case in new york is being handled by the sdny's public corruption unit. is there any significance there? >> there may be. i, you know, used to field these questions when i was a u.s. attorney also and i saw my successor jeff burman who was very strong in his remarks at the press conference this week, and when asked the same question you just asked me said, look, i wouldn't read too much into it at all. you know, when i was u.s. attorney, you might have case that you're investigating that involve statutes whether it's securities fraud or cyber fraud or something else. it may be the case one or more targets are potentially public figures. at the moment you think one or more targets may be public figures and they may never materialize. my ink legitimaling was to put e in the public corruption unit in charge of the case because they like all the other children
prosecutors in the office, i call them all my children because i love them equally, but they have a special sensitivity and understand the sensibilities in investigating public figures. it doesn't mean you're going to see a public figure indicted, but that's my best guess. at the same time, they don't only have public corruption prosecutors on the case, but in the array of folks at the press conference there are also one or two people who focus on sex trafficking who are not necessarily corruption prosecutors. >> preet bharara, thanks so much for joining us. >> thanks, wolf. >> lots to discuss with our analysts who are here standing by. as we cover the breaking news. we'll be right back. with fidelity wealth management you get straightforward advice,
tailored recommendations, tax-efficient investing strategies, and a dedicated advisor to help you grow and protect your wealth. fidelity wealth management. to help you grow and protect your wealth. dto experiencer gthrilling performance. now, at the lexus golden opportunity sales event. get 0.9% apr for 60 months on all 2019 models. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.
whoa. travis in it made it. it's amazing. oh is that travis's app? it's pretty cool, isn't it? there's two of them. they're multiplying. no, guys, its me. see, i'm real. i'm real! he thinks he's real. geico. over 75 years of savings and service. we run right into these crises, and we do not leave until normalcy is restored. we'd been working for days on a site in a storm devastated area. a family pulled up. it was a mom and her kids.
everything they had had been washed away. the only thing that brought any kind of solace was the ability to hand her a device so she could call her family and let them know that she was okay. (vo) there for you when it matters most. join us and get up to $650 when you switch. that's verizon. we're oscar mayer deli fresh your very first sandwich,m... your mammoth masterpiece. and...whatever this was. because we make our meat with the good of the deli and no artificial preservatives. make every sandwich count with oscar mayer deli fresh.
xfinity mobile is a designed to save you money. whether you use your phone to get fit or to find the perfect gift, you'll use less data with a network that automatically connects to millions of wifi hotspots and the best lte everywhere else. so you save hundreds of dollars a year on your wireless bill. xfinity mobile has the best network. best devices. best value. simple. easy. awesome. click, call or visit a store today. i felt completely helpless. trashed online. my entire career and business were in jeopardy. i called reputation defender. they were able to restore my good name. if you are under attack, i recommend calling reputation defender. vo: there's more negativity online than ever. reputation defender ensures that when people check you out, they'll find more of the truth, not trash. if you have search results that are wrong or unfair, visit reputationdefender.com
or call 1-877-866-8555. we're following breaking news. a federal judge in new york has just ruled that the justice department cannot switch its legal team to reargue a -- for a citizenship question on the u.s. census. the judge said the trump administration failed to give a satisfactory reason for the change. let's dig deeper with our correspondents and analysts. laura coates, how unusual is this ruling? >> it's not unusual for a client to change counsel, but it's unusual for someone to be the counsel thefmselves and say i'm not going to offer any reason for why i want to leave, especially because the supreme court took this case and said there is a contrived reason here. so give us some basis to say it's satisfactory. they didn't do that.
they treated it as a rhetorical question, why do you want to leave? oh, well -- more needs to be said to a federal court on an issue this important. >> this judge, federal judge in new york is a very serious guy. you just heard preet tell us. david swerdlick, even if the trump administration is defeated when all is said and done, can't get that question on the citizenship census forms, will this whole fight so scare the immigrant community they won't want to participate in this census? >> i mean potentially, yes, wolf because now this idea is out there in the ether. whether or not it ends up on the census as a question, this idea that the administration is trying to root out who is a citizenship and who is an immigrant, whether legal or not legal, does put a climate of fear out there in the immigrant community and it goes against the purposes of the census, which is to count all the people who are here in the united states regardless of whether they're citizens or legal residents or undocumented immigrants because it has to do
with how federal resources are allocated. >> you know, this attitude that is going on at the white house right now as far the labor secretary, alex acosta, pamela, is concerned. the president said he's doing a great job adds labor secretary, but acosta is coming under enormous fire for what he did when he was the u.s. attorney in south florida a decade ago. and basically had some lenient charges against jeffrey epstein. >> that's right. and, remember, this is the second time he's under fire. the first was back in march and the "miami herald" reported on this plea deal that acosta gave to jeffrey epstein and now it's being revived because of the charges in new york against epstein and this incriminating evidence that was uncovered. but i think what you're seeing from president trump is what we've seen in the past. basically he says, look, he's doing a good job. i'm happy with the job that he's doing. we'll just wait and see. and the white house has previously said back in march there is this internal review. it has not provided clarity on where that stands exactly. that could be because doj is looking at it. but what president trump appears
to be doing is waiting to see how this is going to play out in the media. will the controversy die down again like it did in march or will this stay and will he be under too much pressure and have to let him go? if you look at the past, given all the turnover in his cabinet, the president has fired actually only a small number of his cabinet officials. he normally doesn't like to do it because of this per sense that his administration is in chaos. >> ron brownstein, how do you see this unfolding? >> well, i think the pressure is going to be substantial from democrats. i mean, they have every incentive to keep the focus on the labor secretary. there are even some democrats who are calling for the attorney general to step aside. kamala harris, for example, in this investigation. look, the democratic disdain for william barr i think at this point is bottomless. nancy pelosi said today on a different issue that she was not interested in anything he had to say because she believes he has already lied to congress, but i do think the central focus is going to be the labor secretary. and while no administration likes to retreat on this sort of thing because it kind of conveys
weakness, there really isn't a lot on the other side of the ledger that would make you go to the mattresses to defend alex acosta as your labor secretary. >> what do you think, laura? >> we have an tendency to compartmentalize. this is not an incident to do so. it is an inconsistency to have had a laps of judgement that would have allowed you to give a sweetheart deal, including to people who are unnamed coconspirators who served as facilitators and madams of child pornography, molestation and pedophilia, which is really what it is. i hate the phrase underage girls because it seems to connote something other than what it is, child molestation and pedophilia from somebody with money who didn't -- now the laps in judgement would have to be a total 180 to who he is now. and also there is a lot of information, and we're learning as this case goes on to suggest that it was more than simply a
laps in judgement. perhaps there was something more krups or nefarious about the entire proposition. from a sex offense prosecutor myself, the idea that the victims were never even incorporated in the discussion is an abomination of justice. >> everybody stand by. because there is a lot more breaking news we're following. there are new developments in the truly extraordinary public feud between president trump and top british officials. ♪ ♪ award winning interface. award winning design. award winning engine. the volvo xc90. the most awarded luxury suv of the century. has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family and it really shows.
with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today. the nation's largest senior-living referral service.
for the past five years, i've spoken with hundreds of families and visited senior-care communities around the country. and i've got to tell you, today's senior-living communities are better than ever. these days, there are amazing amenities, like movie theaters, exercise rooms and swimming pools, public cafes, bars, and bistros, even pet-care services. and nobody understands your options like the advisers at a place for mom. these are local, expert advisers that will partner with you to find the perfect place and determine the right level of care, whether that's just a helping hand or full-time memory care. best of all, it's a free service. there is never any cost to you. senior living has never been better, and there's never been an easier way to get great advice. call today. a place for mom -- you know your family, we know senior living. together we'll make the right choice.
a war of words between president trump and top british officials is heating up dramatically tonight with the british foreign secretary calling mr. trump's public criticism of the uk ambassador to washington disrespectful and wrong. president trump lashed out at ambassador kim darroch on twitter, labelling him as whacky and a very stupid guy. that attack followed the leak of darroch's cables to london in which he called the president inept, insecure and incompetent. let's get some more on this truly extraordinary public feud. the former british ambassador to the united states is joining us from london. ambassador, thanks so much for joining us. and i know you say it's an important part of the job for ambassadors to give private advise back home. so, first of all, were you surprised to see the assessment as it was leaked from ambassador darroch? >> well, wolf, good to be with
you again. was i surprised to read what my successor has actually sent back to london? frankly, not terribly. because although some of that language didn't go down in the oval office, it's not very different from what an awful lot of commentators have been saying about this administration, and i would have been surprised if the ambassador on the spot whose job is to report things as he sees them and other people tell him they are had said much less. so the content of it didn't really surprise me, no. >> the president, as you know, he responded on twitter calling ambassador darroch a very stupid guy and a pompous fool. and i'll read directly what he said, "we will no longer deal with him." the prime minister theresa may is standing by the ambassador, but do you think he can effectively serve now that all of this has become public? >> it certainly puts kim in a very difficult position.
i think the first set of salvos that came from the president one might have been able just to shrug it off and say, well, something's got under his skin, he's been watching something on television that's annoyed him and he's lashed out. now we've had three rounds. it's not just insulting to kim who is neither whacky nor pompous more stupid. nor stupid. so it has gotten worse over the last few days. i think that it makes kim's position difficult, but i would like to this that this will pass and that he will be able to carry on discharging his duty. what i think would be intolerable is if somebody said he couldn't do his job or he has to be withdrawn or his tour of duty has to be shortened because somebody quite irresponsibly maybe criminally back here in the uk has leaked the honest assessments which this ambassador and his team have made of what the administration
is up to. that's his job. how could it possibly be right for an ambassador to be withdrawn or regarded as incapable of doing his job anymore when all he's been doing is his job and doing it pretty well, as far as i can see. >> which is a fair point. and you suggest that this leak of these diplomatic cables that were supposed to be secret was no accident. what do you think the motivation was here? >> well, that's a great question, wolf. i do not know. there is an inquiry which has been launched into how this happened because it's not just a single document. this is a dump of sensitive material stretching back a couple of years, which have come from the embassy in washington. somebody's put it together and given it to the mail on sunday for some kind of reason. was it to undermine kim darroch? i doubt it. because he's almost at the end of his four-year tour of duty. was it to ensure his successor is not another diplomat but somebody who is politically deemed to be more of an unquestioning supporting of president trump? maybe.
but i'm afraid this probably got caught up in a nasty polarized debate in the united kingdom as we try to choose a new prime minister between hardline pro-brexit people who are often supporters of donald trump and people who are more professional, dispassional civil servants. there are people who are saying why don't we have a nice political appointee in washington like we had in the past rather than somebody who is known to be doubtful about brexit, a rainer as we call it in the european union, and critical of the president? and some of the politicians here in the united kingdom have said that the criticisms in those documents which were leaked show that kim darroch is not fit to be ambassador in washington. i think that's nonsense but it's an indication of the political debate going on here in london at the moment. >> you're joining us from london right now. what's been the reaction in london, in the uk to what the president has now said about the british ambassador? >> initially, i think people said, well, that's what this
president is, you know? he's -- he's said some pretty rude things about the united kingdom, about our prime minister in the past, but it was telling when jeremy hunt, who is one of the two candidates to be prime minister, was on the hustings tonight and said he thought he was disrespectful and quite wrong for the president to speak of the british prime minister as he had this afternoon. there was spontaneous applause in the studio. i think people don't feel that this is the way the president of the united states should treat either the ambassador on the spot or the prime minister of the united kingdom, given that the uk is such a close ally and partner of the united states in so many of the things that america cares about around the world. >> peter, the former ambassador to the united states, thanks so much for joining us. >> thank you, wolf. and just ahead, the democratic divide over health care deepening. pitting joe biden against some of his top rivals. lick fast like a cookie dough ninja. apply that same speed to the ford hurry up and save sales event. for the first time ever get 20% estimated savings
on select ford models, plus earn complimentary maintenance through fordpass rewards. it all adds up. don't you love math? so get here asap because tasty deals and summer go fast. get in or lose out on 20% estimated savings on select ford models, plus earn complimentary maintenance through fordpass rewards. did you know congress is working to end surprise medical billing? that's when patients are hit with medical bills they thought would be covered by insurance. the problem is big insurance companies want
a one-size-fits-all approach that lets them decide what they'll pay doctors for yocare. letting insurance companies decide means it could be harder for you to see the best doctors when you need them the most. tell congress, "end surprise billing, and don't let insurance companies put profits over patients. paid for by physicians for fair coverage. we carry flowers that signifyn why we want to end the disease. and we walk so that one day, there will be a white flower for alzheimer's first survivor. join the fight at alz.org/walk. you'when you barely the clip a passing car. minor accident -no big deal, right? wrong. your insurance company is gonna raise your rate after the other car got a scratch so small
. the democratic divide over health care appears to be deepening with some of the top tier presidential candidates calling for medicare for all. while the front runner vows to protect obamacare. our political reporter joins news the situation room with details. some sharp disagreement from the candidates. >> yeah, there is, wolf. and joe biden spent the past days ramping up defense of the obamacare appear highlighting the it split with those in the party who are in for medicare
for all. the 2020 fight over health care is on. with joe biden insisting medicare for all isn't the answer. >> starting over it would be i think a zblien the former vice president at president obama's side when the affordable care act became law. even the trump administration reminding voters of his connection. today calling it. >> obama biden care. >> biden is now pitches himself as the protector of the plan. saying he will build on obamacare in offer of public option to buy in government-run insurance. >> i'm opposed to any republican who wants to tis minimal it or any democrat who wants to dismanhattan it will. >> the warning directed at his democraticic rivals pushing medicare for all. >> when it comes to health care there is no middle ground. >> in skafl this weekend. biden singled out out one medicare for all backer >> health care we strongly disagree. i don't want to get dsh dosh
away with obamacare and start over and trash it process. >> this new line of attack comes as harris has struggled to explain whether she supports scrapping private health insurance starting with this moment in january at a cnn townhall. >> let's eliminate all of that and move on. >> then this question at last month's debate. >> many people watching at home have health insurance of their employer hoop who here would abolish the private health insurance in favor of a government-run run plan. >> harris later saying she misunderstood the question. thichlging it was about her own insurance. and she is now trying to ease some voters concerns about medicare for all. >> we cannot go immediately into health care for all. >> but to your point, it can't just happen overnight there will be a transition period. >> a cnn poll found 85% of democrats favor a government-run health care plan. but only 30% say a national program should completely replace private insurance.
that's the number biden is banking on. as he vows obamacare is here to stay. >> no one is going to tear down the jewel of president obama's presidency. i promise you that. >> now joe biden so often refers to himself as a middle class joe out on the campaign trail. and tonight we learn just how much he earned since leaving the white house. he and his wife jill reported earning $11 million in 2017 and $4.6 million the year after. wolf of a good chunk coming from speeches and his book as well. >> millions and millions of dollars. thanks very much for that. stay with us lots more news right after this. ty to experience our most advanced safety technology on a full line of vehicles. now, at the lexus golden opportunity sales event. lease the 2019 es 350 for $379 a month, for 36 months, and we'll make your first month's payment. experience amazing. what does help for heart failure look like? ♪the beat goes on it looks like jill heading off on an adventure. ♪the beat goes on
jill has entresto, a heart failure medicine that helps her heart... so she can keep on doing what she loves. in the largest heart failure study ever, entresto was proven superior at helping people stay alive and out of the hospital. it helps improve your heart's ability to pump blood to the body. don't take entresto if pregnant; it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren, or if you've had angioedema with an ace or arb. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high blood potassium. ♪the beat goes on ask your doctor about entresto for heart failure jill: where to next? entrust your heart to entresto. ♪the beat goes on to entresto. if you have moderate little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream.
it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines, and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. ♪
still nervous about buying uh-oh, la new house.meone's is it that obvious? yes it is. you know, maybe you'd worry less if you got geico to help with your homeowners insurance. i didn't know geico could helps with homeowners insurance. yep, they've been doing it for years. what are you doing? big steve? thanks, man. there he is. get to know geico and see how much you could save on homeowners and renters insurance. what you need and so much more. at wayfair, you'll find just you get to spend less time searching and more time loving every room, even the ones you never thought could look good. you get great deals on the things you need and actually want. you get fast and free shipping on thousands of items and finds for every home, and every style,
at every price. that's what you get when you've got wayfair. so shop now! finally tonight we we are ross pirro who died after a battle of lukia. he ran for president twice as independent getting nearly 19% of the vote in 1992. many republicans blamed him for bill clinton's victory over george h. w. bush. he went on to create the reform party and challenge president clinton in 1996. i interviewed him two years later when he urged clinton to resign over the monica lewinsky scandal and questions about whether he might run again. >> takes another caller from anaheim, california. >> will you run for office in the year 2000. >> i never wanted to run for office. i said if he resigns i will promise not to run for office. that ought to be exciting for both parties because they considered me a nuisance.
>> tonight, former president bill clinton joins in the tributes to perot saying he inspected the passion for politics even when he disagreed. erin burnett starts right now. outfront next breaking news team trump suffering a setback in the effort to have that crucial citizenship question to the 20 to census. a federal judge just ruling tonight. plus trump praising the labor secretary as calls mount for him to resign over a plea deal with a accused child molester and rapist jeffrey ep teen. why is the president standing by his man. >> and mitch mcconnell ignoring he is the descendant of slave owners and why is he comparing him to president obama in that regard? good evening i'm erin burnett outfront tonight we b