tv Anderson Cooper 360 CNN November 27, 2010 2:00am-3:00am EST
people are the strength of our democracy. i offer my concession. >> america's space program will go on. >> this victory truly belongs to you. >> my real apology to her will not come in the form of words. welcome to "timeframes." i'm john king. for the next hour, cnn and "time" magazine will look back at the major events of the first decade of this new millennium,
not just to recount those events, but to examine lessons learned and how perspective often changes when framed in the passage of time. it is a decade of incredible moments and conflicting emotions. the optimism of the new century, the heart-wrenching despair of terrorism, gnawing economic anxiety and frustration and the a provocative look at the decade from hell. hard to remember, perhaps, at the end, but for most of the decade, world markets enjoyed relatively strong economic growth. the number of billionaires in the world nearly tripled. but any sense of economic security, especially here in the united states, is in shambles after the past three years. so as we review this consequential decade and its
important lessons, let's frame the challenge with the help of "time" managing editor, rick stengel. >> it was a decade where things didn't work. >> i, george walker bush, do solemnly swear. >> i can hear you. >> pope john paul ii has died. >> the "columbia" is lost. >> all: we want help. we want help. >> the law that seems universal is the law of unintended consequences. whether it was the election in 2000, 9/11, of katrina. the war in iraq. in every case, the things we expected to happen didn't happen. and we didn't always deal with the unexpected well. >> i accept your nomination. >> i will be honored to accept your nomination. >> we are now in a recession. >> the worst quake in centuries. >> 100 israelis air strikes today. >> all of these things that we thought had been straightened out all went awry.
and we end the decade in some ways almost like where we started with so many things uncertain. >> trust is a word, i think, that means less. i'm not sure if that's the right way to put it. at the end of the decade than it did at the beginning. >> brownie, you're doing a heck of a job. >> we're doing everything we can to stop the damn leak. >> and the government wasn't always straight with us. i think people are skeptical now about institutions and believe that some of that old trust was misplaced. >> how is that hopey-changey stuff working out for you? >> history doesn't necessarily repeat itself but it rhymes so looking back, bewant to see how does that teach us about how to look forward, too? >> so was there rhyme or reason in american politics? if there is a single lesson in all of these "time" magazine covers, it is that we end the decade in many ways just as we began it. deeply divided. red versus blue. back in 2000, it was hanging chads and a contested presidential election settled by the supreme court. now, a resurgent republican party anchored on a stop obama message.
but to call it a decade of status quo politics is to ignore wild swings and historic milestones, including the election of our first african-american president. what happened to all that talk of post-racial, post-partisan america? and is the tea party just a fad or a force to shape the next decade? i'm joined now by joe klein and "time" political columnist and david von drehle. gentlemen, tang for being here. let's start with the what happened to kumbaya, post partisan, post-racial america? are we naive to think it for a second? >> yes. i mean, it was always going to be -- it was always going to be tough. for the president. but i -- you know, i kind of thought -- i think a lot of people thought that the pendulum swing that began with ronald reagan and kind of came to a shuddering end with george bush, you know, two wars, the country in -- you know, in a terrible recession, the pendulum was going to be able to start swinging back. and as soon as it starts swinging back just a little bit, it hit a brick wall. and that was the president's
inability to sell his big ideas to the country. >> if politics is supposed to be about big ideas, if you have these wild swings and the lack of trust, how do we ever deal with big ideas? >> well, i don't know that politics is supposed to be about big ideas. it certainly hasn't been in this country. but then all of a sudden our world changed on september 11th. and then it changed again in the fall of 2008 when the financial market froze in a way that it had never done before. which required some really major action on the part of the government. which people weren't expecting. i don't think people are comfortable with big moves in this country. >> i think they're very leery of big moves, big ideas. the bush years were very damaging because this was -- remember, he wasn't going to do nation building. he was going to walk humbly in the world and he was going to be fiscally responsible. and instead what he got was an
extremely ambitious foreign policy, trying to change the whole map of the middle east, and then a spendthrift congress. and then, i think, the reason the reaction was so rapid to obama was the feeling that it had happened again. that he said he was a centrist, he was going to be in the middle, it wasn't about red, it wasn't about blue. and then here he is with these big democratic programs. >> you kick yourself a little bit when you look back at a position you took during the bush administration when george w. bush to his credit, if you will, tried to tackle social security. the controversy ensued when one of his proposals was to allow people to take a small percentage of their money that goes into social security and instead decide to put it in wall street. put it into private investment accounts. at the time you wrote, good for you, mr. president. now you think, bad idea? >> yeah, well, if you have an issue like the "timeframes" issue when you're looking back on the decade, rather than going
through my many weeks of sheer genius, i think it would be a good idea to go back and take a look at something i got wrong. and the reason why i got social security and privatization of social security wrong is because i grew up during these last 60 years and i had never seen the kind of economic hard time we had. and i didn't understand that there are some social programs where you want to give people an incentive, you want to give them a choice. and -- especially when they're trying to rise up out of poverty. but there are other programs like social security, like food stamps, where you just want to provide something solid. and that's the case with social security. you didn't want to bet on the stock market when the stock market was going to go in the tank the way it did. >> we started with the contested election. now we have this movement called the tea party that sort of has took over the obama movement, which was supposed to be the big thing out of 2008. maybe we'll find out in 2012
they still love him, but they didn't love the democratic party in 2010. who are these new players? >> well, this is -- i think these next two years are going to be fascinating for precisely this reason. all the cards have been thrown up in the air. which ones are going to come down face-up? you know, the -- this tea party movement that's not really a movement yet, where is that going to go? it's an impulse. they've brought a lot of energy,
and get response from north korea. this is the first time we have seen civilians really in the firing line. the people here are used to military contact, but to have them in the line of fire has changed the game here. that's why we have seen anger on the streets from seoul, particularly former businessmen themselves, and they feel north korea was able to launch the attack and they have not done enough to hit back. some of the protesters may have left. it looks restored here for a moment, and we have been here for an hour or 45 minutes, and the situation as settled down.
>> thank you for reporting on a violent outbreak between members of the special forces at the defense ministry building as war games are set to begin in the waters off south korea during the tense times with north korea. we will continue to bring you developments throughout the weekend on that story. our u.s. audience is with us, so we want to remind you of another story we are watching out of the portland oregon, a portland bomb plat that occurred this evening. a 19-year-old man has been arrested in the connection with the plot to detonate a car bomb at a christmas tree lighting ceremony in portland, oregon. the justice department says a naturalized u.s. citizen from somalia could face the maximum sentence of life in prison and a $200,000 fine if convicted. no bomb went off and no injuries
there at the police as the investigators had been
investing for months. >> compared to the beginning of the decade now that we're at the end of the decade, a steady decline on the test that you just laid out? any bright spots in there? >> yes, i would say it's been a steady decline. it's been a solid, steady decline. and the decline is really taking place because other places in the world, which heretofore didn't really exist from an economic standpoint, you know, as competitors. they are just eating our lunch. and i see things happening. that i've never seen before, in terms of -- in terms of our economy.
and i -- i sort of -- i don't smile because it's nothing to smile about, but i do listen to the economists and various of the morning shows, and they talk about jobs. and i say, how do you create jobs? well, they say, job growth, job growth. how do you create jobs when china is making our furniture, when i order curtain walls and the glass is ordered from china. curtain walls for buildings. when so many other products are made outside of the united states. toys are made outside of the united states. they used to be made in the united states. furniture is made, tremendous amounts of furniture coming in from other countries, in particular, china. and we're rebuilding other countries. and nobody seems to do anything about it. and nobody really picks up the mantle. i'm very strong on it i'll do your program. i'll do other programs. i'll talk about how china is taking advantage of this country. >> what do you do about it? whether it's your view that they're cheating or just that they are eating our lunch because they're faster, more nimbler, smarter?
what do we do about it in this country? i assume you don't support protectionism. one answer would be to wall off the country, but where does that get you? >> no, i'd tax chinese products. when you say cheating, they are cheating because they're manipulating their currency. it's very hard for this country to compete. companies within the country, to compete with chinese companies and the nation because in many cases some of these companies are the nation. because of the manipulation of the currency. i read the other day a little article that china is starting to make airplanes. and now they're going to make a plane to compete with the boeing 737. and they're going to throw them out like gravy. then they have a hundred orders already. this is the first. be honest with you, i wouldn't want to own stock in boeing because between manipulation of their currency and other things, it's going to be very hard for boeing and airbus and others to compete. that's just a little article i read where they're making -- watch what happens. i hope you can rebroadcast this in five years. boeing will suffer.
now, we think, oh, boeing is a great exporter, and that's fine. and, by the way if our planes are better and everything else, we'll still -- they'll still have to buy them. even if we do something with -- which what i advocate, a advocate a 25% tax on all chinese products coming into this country. and if you do that, you know, people say, oh, but they're our banker. sure, they're our banker because we're giving them so much money. think of it. we're giving them so much money and then they're loaning it back to us. >> so why won't the political leadership do something? >> i can only think of one thing. because it makes so much sense. it's so simple. and i went to the wharton school of finance. i understand economics. it's so simple. i can only understand really think of one thing, whether it's opec or china, it's called lobbyists. opec has the biggest, most powerful lobbyists in washington. i believe those lobbyists get the politicians to leave opec alone.
>> if 9/11 is one big legacy of the last decade, and it's the biggest, i would think, another is the banking crisis. if there's a guy out there in middle america right now who wants to be the next donald trump and has a good idea, can he get the money? >> john, i see it all the time where people sign for a house, they put down a deposit, then they end up losing the deposit because they can't get a mortgage. and it's just as bad today as it was a year ago and it's sort of interesting because the regulators are very tough on the banks. and yet the banks, you know, get -- the banks took in all of this money. if you want to just say metaphorically they took in the people's money and now they're not loaning it back to the people, so i'm very disappointed in the banking industry. i think it's terrible what's happened, but i will say if you want to start a business, if you want to open -- now, if you have a company, a great company that has a aaa standard, then you get money for nothing. it's unbelievable.
the interest rates are so low. but the only people that can get -- in theory, when you can't get money, the interest rates should be through the roof. like they were many years ago, when the prime rate went up to like 18.5%. you couldn't get money. so, therefore, the rarity went up here you can't get money and the rate is
like -- i'm getting on cds now less than 1%. substantially less than 1%. i've never seen that before. and yet there's no money around. >> all right. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. >> and for a very different view, a man who's innovated his way to success over and over and over again. next, our chat with sir richard branson. in the past decade, what was your best bet? >> ah. >> but first, "milestones." some of the notable passings of the past ten years.
but i knew that i was going to need a day job. we actually have a lot of scientists that play music. the creativity, the innovation, there's definitely a tie there. one thing our scientists are working on is carbon capture and storage, which could prevent co2 from entering the atmosphere. we've just built a new plant to demonstrate how we can safely freeze out the co2 from natural gas. it looks like snow. it's one way that we're helping provide energy with fewer emissions.
it's one way that we're helping provide energy attract so much fine dirt on hard floors you may never go back to your old vacuum. [ funny voice ] hey, vacuum, wanna attract more fine dirt? then try the static balloon! [ squeaking ] now who's attractive? [ female announcer ] sorry, vacuum. swiffer sweepervac has both a powerful vacuum and electrostatic dry cloths, to trap and lock fine dirt, dust, and hair better than a leading upright vacuum or your money back. ♪ she blinded me with science ♪ sir richard branson not only believes the solution to the struggling u.s. economy lies in embracing globalism, he sees a
path to prosperity and adventure above the globe in outer space. you are one of the world's best-known risk-takers. in the past decade, what was your best bet? >> i hope our best bet will be deciding to go into creating a commercial spaceship company. and virgin galactic was born, you know, the spaceship is now finished, the mother ship is now finished. the space port is nearly finished, and president obama has basically indicated that he wants commercial spaceship companies to -- to offer space travel to people rather than -- rather than spending all that money on nasa in the future. >> i want to come back in a moment to some of the challenges here on earth. but how important is it -- to you it's part of a business
model, but how important is it do you think for society, for cultures, for individuals or groups of individuals to dream like that, to dream the impossible? >> i think it's enormously important. i think the 400 people who have been to space all come back changed people. they all come back, you know, wanting to protect this beautiful world that we live in. and, you know, i think we -- we've got to, you know, aspire for -- you know, we've got to reach for the stars. and if you're in a position to do so, you mustn't waste that position. >> what about richard branson personally? which decision do you wish you could -- or which investment do you wish you could go back and have a do-over? >> i think the last decade saw the end of recorded music as we know. we had tremendous fun over the years, you know, with wonderful, wonderful bands, rolling stones, janet jackson, sex pistols, lots
of great bands. but -- but recorded music is -- has almost died in the last decade thanks to ipod and downloading. it's still alive and well with live music on -- you know, the bands touring and, you know, attracting enormous crowds. but, you know, that whole industry is pretty well died. >> it has been a flat or down decade when it comes to the economy, and people seem threatened by globalization. it was once the great promise. it brought us all closer together. we would understand different people. now it seems to many to be a threat, over your shoulder is a cover that says, how to restore the american dream. many americans feel the fundamental basic foundation of our society that we'll hand off to our children a better world than we inherited is somehow at risk. do you see that? in the last decade, did something happen economically? >> well, look, i think the most
important thing for americans to realize is -- is not to be frightened of globalization. if you start -- america is a weak country at the moment. you know, where you should be trading is with countries like india, china, the far east, africa is about to boom. you know, south america is booming. the last thing you want to do is, you know, pull up the draw bridges. because, you know, the way to get out of your problem is -- is get out there and trade with these companies. and with these countries all over the world. and so, you know, so, you know, it is completely counterproductive to start being -- you know, being frightened of globalization. we should welcome globalization. and, you know, and realize what -- what mistakes have been made. and, you know, there have been some catastrophic mistakes made here in america over the last ten years. you know, but they've -- those mistakes have been acknowledged. you know, the banks have been
propped up. and now -- and now over the next decade, we've got to start -- you know, the long -- you know, the long climb back up again. and i'm sure that with -- you know, you've got lots of great entrepreneurs here in america. and you can get back up and on top again. >> sir richard branson, thank you for your time. >> pleasure. thank you. when "timeframes" continues, it's lady gaga versus harry potter. the top entertainment stories of the last ten years. and one man's fascinating look into the future and its blinding speed of innovation. stay with us. ♪ ♪
♪ [ nail gun banging ] ♪ [ male announcer ] let's be honest. no one ever wished for a smaller holiday gift. ♪ it's the lexus december to remember sales event, and for a limited time, we're celebrating some of our greatest offers of the year. see your lexus dealer. rheumatoid arthritis going? they're discovering simponi®, the first self-injectable r.a. medicine you take just once a month. taken with methotrexate,
simponi® helps relieve the pain, stiffness and swelling of r.a. with one dose once a month. visit 4simponi.com to see if you qualify for a full year of cost support. simponi® can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious and sometimes fatal events can occur, such as infections, cancer in children and adults, heart failure, nervous system disorders, liver or blood problems, and allergic reactions. before starting simponi®, your doctor should test you for t.b. and assess your risk of infections, including fungal infections and hepatitis b. ask your doctor if you've been to a region where certain fungal infections are common. tell your doctor if you're prone to infections, or develop symptoms such as fever, fatigue, cough or sores. you should not start simponi® if you have an infection. [ woman ] ask your rheumatologist about simponi®. just one dose, once a month. nah. we have something else. but if you're hurt and miss work
from the end of the "star wars" saga to the rise of reality television, the influence of pop culture in this decade, for better or worse, has been more pervasive in our society than ever before. joining me now to talk about it, jim, "time's" media critic, be linda, editor at large of "time" and r ahdika. thanks for being with us. one constant in the decade is the culture of celebrity or the celebrity culture, call it what you will. that has been with us, pervasive. has it changed over the decade? >> i think what you found is with the rise of the internet and people blogging, a lot more was said about celebrities.
just a lot more volume of material about celebrities. some of it completely untrue. some of it wacky. and some of it getting very close to home so there was just more of it coming in. and then towards the end of the decade, interesting, you saw the celebrities beginning to use it for themselves, having their own twitter feeds, having their own blogs so they could talk directly to the people without going through media, which is a very interesting development, i think. >> the other weird thing about celebrity i think -- >> weird? celebrities are weird? >> no. well, some of them maybe. but is that you saw the rise -- with the rise of reality television, you see the rise of these sort of regular-person celebrities, which is a strange fit, but it's become more and more pervasive. >> have we redefined celebrity ies with "real housewives" and shows like that? why? do we want to be voyeurs? >> i think if there's an overarching trend of the last decade, it was the decade where you could see everything. where there was a screen everywhere. where everybody had a camera in
their pocket and so on. i think that reality tv was kind of in the spirit of that. you know, it was this notion that if you could just be a fly on the wall and watch, you know, a regular person or a group of housewives in beverly hills or a bunch of people stranded on an island, you would see fascinating drama unfold. that might have been manipulated but i think that was really powerfully attractive to people. >> who wins the decade? harry potter or lady gaga? >> harry potter. >> i think harry potter wins the decade just because he had a longer life, i think. and he dresses better. >> wait a minute. i don't know about that. >> does not have a brassiere that he can fire things from, but i believe there was a spell for that that they didn't cover in the books. >> i will be really interested to see -- i'm a big fan of the harry potter books. i'll be really interested to see how they stand the test of time, whether kids who weren't reading those books, growing up with those books, 10, 20 years from
now, is that series going to be as potent as it is? i mean possibly. the other big series in movies you had this decade was "the lord of the rings," bringing back a classic of the 20th century and bringing it to the screen. and so there are definitely ways to keep those kinds of story as live. >> so technology makes it much more accessible but at the same time, it gives the providers power, power to steer you, to push you somewhere? >> and not just the providers. i don't think we can talk about recommendations without talking about facebook and how many people find their -- the things that they watch and the things that they listen to through other people's facebook pages and twitter and their recommendations. so it's become a much more social event, the sharing of this stuff. >> i mean, everybody has kind of become their own producer and distributor of culture now. i think you see this a lot in television where, you know, say there's a really -- there's a "saturday night live" skit that goes viral. you might have seen it on tv or
you might have seen it embedded in a blog somewhere or might have gotten it e-mailed to you. it's harder to control where it is and how people experience culture because things spread so much more easily. and people are kind of through their facebook pages or whatever, we're all kind of the programmers of our own, you know, cultural networks. >> we talk about clutter. and there's certainly a lot of clutter, a lot of noise, a lot of static because we have so many choices. one of the things you don't like that you don't write about is all this stuff right down here on the screen below us in the television, the crawl, the ticker, the flipper. >> you know, when we were working on this project, one thing i thought was what is the one thing on television that kind of defined the decade for me? and it occurred to me that if there's just an image, it was that decade for me on television, it was the idea which emerged or was popularized anyway the morning of september 11th of this little crawl of information that was constantly going across the bottom of the screen. and that after the morning of september 11th, just kind of stuck around. and to me, it kind of symbolizes this hyperstimulation that you -- that you see in the media
now. there are, you know, millions of screens within screens. and, you know, all of these streams of data that we have to process. and to me, the crawl just -- it represents this notion of this kind of constantly agitated, look at this, look at this, look at this. there's always more going on than you can process. that i think it's just the spirit of condition suming media today. >> does that scare you or do you like more information or does it make you a.d.d.? >> you know, i think you have to learn how to turn it off every once in a while and our technology still does come with off buttons and you still can pick up up a book and read it and the book doesn't have a ticker. or you can go to a movie theater and watch a movie. i mean, there are still sanctuaries >> or a play. or opera. >> which still exists. there are still sanctuaries of culture. and, you know, pop culture, like anything else, has partly to do with escapism. so in a way it becomes self-defeating if in doing it, you're sort of agitating yourself even more.
>> unless your book is on your ipad, in which case your book can turn into angry birds, which is awesome. >> exactly. >> which is awesome. jim, belinda, radhika, thanks for coming in and being with us. when we return, i'm speaking with a futurist who says technology, technology could lead to the fountain of youth. more of "timeframes" after this. ♪
♪ [ crowd cheering ] not me! i'm not gonna take this! ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ until the combination of three good probiotics in phillips' colon health defended against the bad gas, diarrhea and constipation. ...and? it helped balance her colon. oh, now that's the best part. i love your work. [ female announcer ] phillips' colon health.
the explosion of information technology is a global phenomenon. in the past decade alone, internet usage in china, up from 22 million users in 2000 to 420 million today. in india, cell phone usage soaring from just 2 million handsets in 2000 to approximately 545 million cell phones in use now. my next guest says technology won't just continue to expand but that growth will accelerate at an even faster pace. futurist ray kurwhile believes that accelerating technology will adapt to our lives, may even help us live longer. we began our discussion by looking back at the biggest developments of the decade. >> well, the web was very formative ten years ago. most people didn't use search engines. think about that. that sounds like ancient history. and, of course, even five years
ago most people didn't use social networks, wikis, blogs. so the world has changed dramatically and it's going to continue to move in the future. >> will we control the technology in that reality or will sometimes the technology control us? >> well, we see examples of both good and bad in every technology. i would say that really it is very empowering of the individual. a couple of kids started facebook. a couple of kids started google. the tools of creating change in the world are in everybody's hands. a kid in her dorm room can create a whole orchestra. my father hired one to hear an orchestra. so i think it's very democratizing and allows people to express themselves. we really are for the most part in control of the technology. we do have new challenges, like maintaining privacy. used to be enough just to close the curtains in your bedroom. now we have 1,000 virtual windows on our lives. but we're learning how to deal with these issues. >> most of that is an upside.
we learn new things about ourselves. we learn how to keep ourselves alive. is there a down side? >> a profound one is in biology so the same technology that allows us to enable us to reprogram biology away from cancer and heart disease, which i believe will happen over the next decade or so, could also enable a bioterrorist to reprogram a routine biological virus to be more deadly, more communicable, create a super weapon. we're not defenseless. we can and we should and we are in fact creating a rapid response system. so if somebody does that, we can create the defenses very quickly. but that's not a pat solution. it's something we really need to invest in. >> when you say extending human longevity, do you have a target there? do we extend the average life span by two years, five years? or is extending it by 10, 20, or longer years within our realm? >> well, people ask me how long can we extend our lives when these things happen but it's not one thing. we get to a point, say, 20 years
from now, we'll have new technologies then that enable us to go another 20 years and then at that point, we have yet more technologies. we'll get to a point where we're adding more time than is going by. by my calculations, in about 15 years. it's not a guarantee of everlasting life, but it will change the metaphor of the sands of time running out. >> as humans use this technology, have access to so much more information, can be constantly wired and plugged in, is one of the -- is it an inevitable or not, but is it that all of us tend to have more a.d.d. because we have so many things at our disposal and at our fingertips? >> well, the technologies that succeed are the ones that become like us rather than us having to change ourselves to become like an old-fashioned concept of a machine. so i think technology can actually make us smarter. it is already. i've got all of human knowledge on my belt. we do have to choose what we're going to spend our time on.
time triage for our personal lives has always been an issue. we have many more choices today. but ultimately that's a good thing, and the power is in our hands as to what we want to spend our time on. but if you want to create music or graphic arts or software, you don't have to be fabulously wealthy to do these things. the tools are very available to everyone. >> so then look ahead to your predictions to give me some of your list for the next decade. i assume leaps and bounds advancement in energy is one of them. what might be others? >> we really will be meeting a major part of our engineering needs in ten years. in 20, we'll be meeting all of our needs from these renewable inexpend sive sources. we will see some real fruits from the bio technology area. if we go 15, 20 years, i believe we will really have conquered all the major diseases but ten years we will see major strides against cancer, heart disease, other diseases, by being able to reprogram our biochemistry. we'll be able to turn off the fat insulin receptor gene and eat as much as we want without
retaining all this excess fat in our bodies, things like that. the computing technology will be so tiny it'll be in our clothing, in our belt buckles. we'll be online all the time. we'll have images written directly to our retina. we'll be in a full immersion virtual reality, augmented reality environment. search engines won't wait to be asked. they'll see you struggling with something and they'll just put a little pop-up in your visual field of view reminding you of the name of that actress or whatever it thinks is the information that you'd benefit from. when "timeframes" continues, the constantly evolving english language and how two opposing words became mashed up into one of the more commonly used words in today's lexicon. stay with us. ( woman ) even with an overactive bladder,
i don't always let the worry my pipes might leak compromise what i like to do. i take care with vesicare, because i have better places to visit than just the bathroom. ( announcer ) once-daily vesicare can help control your bladder muscle, and is proven to treat overactive bladder with symptoms of frequent urges and leaks, day and night.
if you have certain stomach or glaucoma problems, or trouble emptying your bladder, do not take vesicare. vesicare may cause allergic reactions that may be serious. if you experience swelling of the face, lips, throat or tongue, stop taking vesicare and get emergency help. tell your doctor right away if you have severe abdominal pain or become constipated for three or more days. vesicare may cause blurred vision, so use caution while driving or doing unsafe tasks. common side effects are dry mouth, constipation, and indigestion. ( woman ) you have better things to join than always a line for the bathroom. so, pipe up and ask your doctor today about taking care with vesicare.
attract so much fine dirt on hard floors you may never go back to your old vacuum. [ funny voice ] hey, vacuum, wanna attract more fine dirt? then try the static balloon! [ squeaking ] now who's attractive? [ female announcer ] sorry, vacuum. swiffer sweepervac has both a powerful vacuum and electrostatic dry cloths, to trap and lock fine dirt, dust, and hair better than a leading upright vacuum or your money back. ♪ she blinded me with science
i, for some reason, did not get a bentley in the last decade. language is a living organism ha grows with our experience and this last decade is no exception. summing up the decade in just a few notable new words is the unenvyable task of my next guest. fancy gibbs, "time" magazine's executive editor.
thanks for being with us. let's start with one you make note of in the magazine, locivore. >> locivore, which originated in world environment day in 2005 really captures the movement for eating foods grown locally. talks about sustainability, all of the farmers markets everywhere. we're all locivores now. >> frenemy. are you my friend or enemy. >> frenemy actually first appeared in print in 1953, but this was really the decade, i think especially maybe with reality tv that no one was really sure who was a friend, who was a rival, who was an enemy. and so that word really came into common usage, i think. >> do you only have friends on facebook or can you have frenemies? >> well, of course, friend itself turns into a verb. unfriend as well. the word friend went through a lot of new iterations this decade. >> and a term we heard after the recession especially around the recession, staycation. >> staycation.
there's a british version of that. if they're not going on holiday, it's a holistay. a stay indication is when you can't afford to go anywhere so you stay at home and clean up and watch a lot of movies. >> sounds more romantic than a stay indication. waterboarding. >> waterboarding, which dates back at least to the spanish inquisition, but i would warrant that before this decade, very few of us could have defined it, much less have it come, sadly, into common usage in our political and national security debates. >> an example of though history does repeat itself. >> yes. >> and subprime. >> subprime, a -- one of those squirrely loans to a dodgy consumer. official officially to someone whose credit rating is below about 640, but by 2007 when it was declared the word of the year, unfortunately, that was a word that defined too much of our financial dealings with one another. >> what will be the word of the
next decade? >> i hope it's a very hopeful one. >> hopeful would be good. than which, we appreciate your time and thank you for joining us for "timeframes" for all of us here at cnn and "time," have a great holiday. the news continues here on cnn. she felt lost... until the combination of three good probiotics in phillips' colon health defended against the bad gas, diarrhea and constipation. ...and? it helped balance her colon. oh, now that's the best part. i love your work. [ female announcer ] phillips' colon health. i love your work. three. two. one. ♪ don't cha wish your work phone was hot like me?... ♪ the droid pro by motorola
knows you need business on the go. with its powerful 1 gigahertz processor... ♪ da da da don't cha... ♪ its globetrotting wi-fi hotspotting swagger... it knows you want a rich web experience with adobe flash and access to over 100,000 android apps. finally a work phone worth taking home. the man you've become. and you learned something along the way. about the world. and yourself. ♪ this is the age of knowing what you're made of. and knowing how to get things done. so, why would you let something like erectile dysfunction get in your way? isn't it time you talked to your doctor about viagra? 20 million men already have. with every age comes responsibility. ask your doctor if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take viagra if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. side effects may include headache, flushing, upset stomach, and abnormal vision.
to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than four hours. stop taking viagra and call your doctor right away if you experience a sudden decrease or loss in vision or hearing. you didn't get to this age by having things handed to you. this is the age of taking action. viagra. talk to your doctor. see if america's most prescribed e.d. treatment is right for you.