tv Panel Discussion on Ronald Reagan CSPAN September 1, 2016 10:12pm-11:11pm EDT
with the united states and they've done an astonishing job of trans leading to the foreign policy that has never previousl been transcribed and they are stunning and derogatory and terrifying. >> we have time for one more question i think.s. >> those of you mentioned whenou the president talked to the general and he said isn't this time to give it up was he meaning to re-sign or did he have something darker in my? >> this was the summer of 1974 nixon brings u up the whole imae of the military tradition where an officer leaves a pistol on a drawer and mixing apparently raises the possibility should
you leave a pistol on a drawer for me and that made him anxious that he wanted to kill himself. how much of these are cries for help in the reassurance or whether it indicates true suicidal ideation. the fact he didn't kill himself and yes this is one thing one thing about him he would get knocked down and come back again and again. he was finished off in 62 and he said he won't have nixon to kick around anymore. even after he is with him from office, he moves back and he had this beautiful house. he moves back to new york and is a block away from arthur
schlessinger in the belly of the beast. he needed to get back into the arena. >> two months after he'd be assigned committees outside implement the end it's october, 1974 compounded by depressionr that flares up and he goes into a coronary crisis and its brushed to the hospital and his doctor writes a memoir tha the t he almost died that night. he came very close to. >> they were saying wake up, come back.
>> while he did come and he spent the next 20 years of his life turning his career into that terrible of a man who had suffered, died and had been reborn. that's why these two books are so well timed out because 40 years come if you go back 20 years in the 1990s, there is an obvious and largely successful i think attempt to reinvent the legacy and the global statesman and now 20 years later i think we can finally use the tapes and thehe journals and above recommendations and reviews and get a great sense of what's mixing really was like. so i wanted to remind everyone we've been talking to tim weiner, the author of one man against the world. the tragedy of richard nixon and
policy and senior vice president and director of the international security program at the center for strategic and international studies. >> congress isn't going to wake up one morning and say let's triple the budget. but if that isn't going to happen and the military and the foreseeable future will continue to be asked to take on the task to make sure the military is good at it. >> sunday at noon eastern live at hillsdale college in michigan with author and radio host dennis prager the author of the nine questions people ask about judaism, happiness is a serious problem, why the jews, still the best hope and the ten commandments. join in the conversations with your phone calls from noon to 3 p.m. eastern on c-span2. 8 p.m. eastern former white house correspondent profiles the 10% 80s since 1960 and her
book. she speaks of politics and prose bookstore in washington, d.c.. and monday on the science used to improve the effectiveness and safety of u.s. military. e. laine on why the public has lost faith in the political leaders, biographer jean edward smith on the presidential tenure of george w. bush and senator trent lott and biographer jon meacham talked about presidential politics. go to booktv.org for the complete weekend schedule. next a discussion on president ronald reagan from the fourth annual san antonio book festiv festival. >> welcome to the san antonio book festival. this panel is called ronald
reagan by my fact and fiction. i'm gilbert garcia from the san antonio express news and i'm very excited to be a part of the panel with two brilliant writers who in very different ways in the most recent books look at the legacy of ronald reagan. before we get started, i want to let you know both authors will be signing books in the reference area on the second floor after the session ends, and a portion of the proceeds benefit. this panel will air on c-span2 on april 30. he will devote about the last ten, 15 minutes for questions so if you have questions, we'll do our best to give everybody a chance to ask those. to my far left, h. w. brand holds the chair at the university of austin and "new york times" best-selling author he was a finalist for the pulitzer prize biography for the
first american and traitor to his class. he's written biographies of franklin roosevelt communities grant among others and the latest book is ronald reagan, the life to the biography of the president. to my immediate left, thomas is the author of nine novels including dewey defeats truman. truman. he's a contributor to the new yorker, "new york times" book review and the atlantic. in 2011 he received the american academy memorial award and has been the editor of gq in the national madonna for the humanities and the latest book looks at the reagan years by weaving fictional characters with historical events and historical figures such as ronald and nancy reagan, nixon, margaret thatcher and one of my personal favorite characters in the, merv griffin. [laughter] you write about this wall ronald
reagan had at the detachment and i think nancy said she was the only person even though she could only go so far and thomas, i know you talked about how you've written about historical characters from their point of view in many times you do that with both nixon and nancy but then ronald reagan was very tough to do that with so i guess i will start with bill and talk about what accounts for that wall that so many people talked about and what kind of challenges posed in writing your book. >> when i was writing on the book i was doing it for a previous book and i was speaking on the radio show i'm pretty sure that it was based in chicago and at the end of the hour, the host asked a question that comes up all the time in
this context. he said what's your next project and i said i was working on ronald reagan. he put his hand over the microphone and said after we get off the air, there is something i need to tell you so i'm all years. i felt okay. after we got off the air we had to hear what he had to say and if you want to understand ronald reagan is one thing you need to keep in mind. he said of ronald reagan was the son of an alcoholic father. and i wasn't quite sure what to make of this comment because i didn't know if he thought he was telling me something i didn't already know. but his father was an alcoholic because he wrote two memoirs and describes what like growing up as the son of an alcoholic father and so i waited to hear what i have to say further and
so he said i speak as the son of an alcoholic father and i would tell you, he said, when you grow up in those circumstances you develop a characteristic attitude towards the world and learn to keep your emotions to go south because the person on whom you most want to rely who is going to be an adult, the one who will want to be your pillar of emotional strength is the most unreliable person in your universe and one day he is your best friend and is telling you a funny story and throwing the baseball around the backyard and is taking you out for ice cream and the next day he is beating the living daylights out of you and every morning when you wake up you don't know which one you will be dealing with so you learn to build this wall around yourself and you develop kind of an emotional self-sufficiency. this is what he told me and i
was probably halfway into my research and i thought okay this was his experience. and it was an interesting insight. i think quite sincerely and accurately she knew him far better than anyone else but there were times when the wall went up between the two of them and even she didn't know what was going on was in his head and heart so i thought if she said this, this at least corroborates to that extent what might radio host had said. said. there's another moment and this bit of evidence comes from a.
if they called winter afternoon getting dark at temperatures below freezing there's snow on the ground coming home with the ymca and he walks down the street onto the sidewalk, turns to get into the house and there is his father passed out in the snow and in his telling he pauses for a second and ask themselves whether he should just walk on inside the house. now i'm in the memoir he doesn't tease out exactly what that means but the implication is i'm going to let him die in the snow here. now in the next sentence in the memoir he says i've decided to bring this in. but here's an 11-year-old kid entertaining but his world might be better if his father were dead. to me that is a pretty heavyweight having an affair. so i'm not going to say that this explains everything about ronalronald reagan but does expa lot about his standoffishness.
he said i think that this is overblown. and consider the reagans as personal friends. he said he had one friend he married her. [laughter] thought however molas that even nixon had to france. [laughter] so to understand that the unusual quality but there were times when i thought reagan was preposterous silly but other times it that he was deep white the character in the '80s he thinks reagan in this way to know very little so one of
the keys to reagan is his film career such u.s. can one time how can an actor be president and then you realize he wasn't an actor but could do the job but his acting career paid tremendous decisions on bill whole to imagine things very sentimentally. in a cheap hollywood way. lot of minor concern that at the time is perceived as a failure. but it comes over the
transcripts of the summit but the note taker is taking very detailed notes and then reagan says 10 years from now we can come in backyard to bury the last nuclear weapon and have a party for the whole world. i will be a very old man at that time and they will say is that you? i will say it is good to see you. it is like running and save the world if you look at him compared to nixon of the tactician who would steady above the issue to lend astonishingly greater degree he could not bring himself
to that point without the soviet union by reagan could buy the key learned that in hollywood. >> i think that is the central part of your book as it is focused on the summit and it was perceived that the time maybe we have a different perspective now but what was reagan's legacy if you look at the cold war? >> i will say there was a large portion of the media and those watching but most of them did not realize what the top got to. he said i will abolish nuclear weapons and there wasn't that standard so
reagan can that deeply disappointed. in addition to enhancing his imagination to envision himself in the role hollywood taught reagan how to be a celebrity and put itself in public and one of the things i concluded his presidential success depends on a large part of the ability to perform of presidency. it isn't good enough to understand how the government works but the public comes to expect so one of the finest beaches of 20th-century rhetoric with
of loss of the challenger basically the counselor and chief this is something that jimmy carter had a really hard time because carter was better in policy but he didn't understand the craft of being president to philby's roles. would they learn from hollywood it is hard to find the bad picture of ronald reagan coming out of that last session of rico veeck he is surly ejected because he thought he could get to the point where they could rid the world of nuclear weapons and disappointed in happen but he could spin that as a success but interestingly some people
were thrilled that when he went off with his presidency reagan is more regularly criticized from the right and from the left to say he is going off with america's nuclear arsenal so even if he came to lead deal he never would have gotten the deal or berger chopped wouldn't have so one of the things was demonstrate so he backed down with the intermediate nuclear weapons with the strategic weapons and agreed to the deal all along and he got the deal
the next year. >> so in the time leading up to the summit you're trying to give a vice and i was fascinated if there is so much research and one of the things that is mentioned as they conversed from time to time. >> nine have rather crucial facts. one of the things i was struck by is the frequency and the calls were initiated and nixon was on his longstanding quest and he wanted is advice to be valued by one of the things
that i sorely missed that i did not have when i was writing the reagan book you can listen to the filmmaking fall calls the 10:00 at night. of course we don't know what the substance of of conversation like reagan's diary and he does record things irregularly and in a way that frequently with a political enemy.
>> so there is room for a novelist. so what is fascinating the detail of reagan's testimony to be anticipated of the mccarthy area -- era with the new deal and the democrats in the 30's or 40's where did that transformation happen that is the place to look at. >> one of the big questions is even during his presidency acknowledged in terms of political philosophy but reagan was a legacy democrat.
his father was a democrat he got a job for the neil -- for the new deal agency so he was quite willing to go along he was a politically engaged as a college student but one of the things he did admire in this transcends political philosophy was reagan was starting his radio career when roosevelt was conducting his fireside chats and roosevelt was a model of how you use radio to create a world for the listeners out there and he appreciated that as someone
who eventually wanted to convey his vision to the american people but by the time reagan came along the medium was television so to the end of his political career in one of the last beach's he gave dainty 88, again he cited roosevelt as a model not so much what to do but how to be president but in terms of the change of the philosophy but he was never really a liberal to begin with some it was easy to shaky above that the reagan tells the story if it was his awareness of communist and hollywood and the threat that they posed not simply to the movie industry but to reagan himself. as the head of the screen actors guild a bitter strike
behind the camera crews and a union that had a strong trying to carve out the turf and reagan to revise the union and partly for reasons world war two's over the actors want to get back on the regular peacetime pay scale. for the screen actors there rather highest skilled of the union's favor on the side of management as labor by reagan make the decision of a jurisdictional dispute that actors can cross the picket lines and for this he was physically threatened. so the cold war came home to reagan that is the moment he
began to rethink his ideas actually he may have felt that emotionally but it doesn't wash politically because american liberals were as strongly opposed to communism actually more subtle but the cold war with harry truman was his idea and not taft. so that doesn't exactly answer the question but part of that is he was a wealthy man at the time when the top marginal rate on income tax was 90% and you don't have to be a conservative to think 90 percent is pretty high. and other part that is important with reagan's political development is he got a job as a spokesman for general electric and they paid his way eight years and
they were writing the checks and reagan was used to playing of rolls of the screen writers but now he writes his own script so he and stands where they come from he didn't have to endure in the strongly held belief to gradually think that the private enterprise system works well and the jobless to convince the ge workers against unionizing to go out on strike so he also begins to believe the government is wasteful so he looks at various programs and one of the programs he is criticizing is the tennessee valley authority but it turns out that is one of the biggest consumers of ge equipment so became known
to reagan that this was causing problems for management that he would say he really value the fact that the ge management did not sincere him they did not have to because he censored himself he understood i could find other examples of ways and don't have to pick on the bottom line so is relatively easy for him to gravitate across the spectrum partly because he had no deeply held beliefs in the first place and essentially he was a pocket book republican before a philosophical republican. >> along those lines in 76 with a presidential campaign he attracted a lot of the democratic crossover votes and is history as a democrat probably helped him to convert people but this year we see donald trump leading
the presidential field and looks like he is getting substantial democratic crossover votes his message is make america great again but reagan and 76 essentially said we are pushed around by the soviet union beginning away the panama canal we don't win anymore so is there a difference between their personality and the political climate at that time? so to get both of your perspectives on the differences when reagan was doing and what we see with donald trump. >> politically i have a ambivalent feelings mostly in the foreign sphere domestically and feel he was lacking in all kinds of ways but yet whether your writing
history or historical fiction to imagine what they would say about current affairs is a fool's errand we don't know but i would venture i think reagan would be aghast at donald trump and be appalled. >> what would bother him the most? >> his grotesque lack of manners ronald reagan even deep into alzheimer's was court the around women and would move aside on the elevator in the office building in los angeles. he was not punitive or asia weaker. and whether they liked it or
not in a lot of what they said was true that by vat time to be its most nuanced position but that did not change within the space of the two twitter cycles. that was very bracing to watch where there is nothing about the campaign right now. but one thing 76 did he was way behind he only began to take off in the late months of the primary. at that point cbs was still
and i would hear look ronald reagan on the radio. >> to think that was simplistic. >> when i was growing up but to not necessarily get it but to be where he wrote that himself he was dealing with the big issues of the day if you don't agree or not they were well put together five men there radio. >> even less than that they were tightly scripted will perform to and i thought this is good. >> this was essential to his political development
because he had to school himself on five different topics of weekend death he wrote was just right for a presidential candidate because on the stump you of my speech for 15 minutes of the latest epa regulation maybe 30 seconds so his two-minute talks were just the right link and gave him a breath and prepared him for political life but what he would think of the current state my book was published last may and when the book came out i did the talk shows especially fox the question came up and i was hoping there'd be a desire to grapple with him as a historical figure but almost immediately how would he care today but which are the most like kim? su remember this is may i
said this will sound odd fit with the fact of the candidate that is most like reagan is not pulling very well right now but i think it is rick perry. consider long-term big state governor, good looking a bit since the humor, five days later he dropped off. [laughter] by said again said demonstrates he is not a ronald reagan as the campaign developed i said the difference is 2016 is not 1980 and donald trump in 1980 when not have become a phenomenon that he is but comparing him directly the first thingthat i noticed of the difference if is the immense respect reagan have for the office of which he
was running. he entered politics after big speech for barry goldwater intending to run for president but he understood you don't run for president never been elected to anything else you have to show you have the tops you show respect by the highest office by being elected to the lower offices he did want to be governor but you work your way up. fifth force donald trump johnson at the toff and also the fundamental difference ims convinced then a was but reagan played to people's hopes but trump's plays to people's fears and in my observation of the way americans but they may get riled up by their fears and
anger grow when it comes to it the fear motivated primarily by anchor and fear and never in the history of the presidency elected anybody so the ones who are elected that play to the hopes a convincing vision that america can be great and not simply say the words or bully the other countries to build a wall but appealed to the voters visions of the american dream the open america society the biggest thing the country has going for it is the ability to appeal to other countries and reagan was that unusual individual and that is an optimistic conservative by their nature they tend to be pessimist the thing changes for the worse but somehow he managed to be a conservative
but optimistic in part of the past to do with the radio script those 122nd scripps that may give you a shallow view but i will say he had deeply eiffel to believe shallow thought views on the world than the combination is magic in politics because it you think too deep there is always one hand intellectuals do not rule the political world they comment and wring their hands and will not call him the anti-intellectual but his simplified views of the world and american history is what resonated well with what americans like to think about their country. so there was a nice fit with
the vision that reagan had and most voters have for america it worked well tromp is an entirely different story i hope that on have to explain five years from now laugh laugh top trump became president of the unit is states. >> your book is set at the height of the aids crisis one of the most enduring critiques of his presidency is the move to slowly to deal with the aids crisis. is that a fair critique? and what was his thinking at the time blacks in $0.91 laugh laugh that is fair believers the seams to understand his record on aids was terrible who doesn't understand that is hillary clinton.
the single most bizarre interview of the political season if you don't count all of the interviews with donald trump that nancy reagan's penal she said he started a national conversation about aids but if he had the sole contribution he made to the aids crisis was having dr. dr. coop as surgeon general but when it was there at least he had the realism with to set before congressional committee to say people should be using condoms to save their lives. that is his honorable acted not the president reagan that is the failing.
>> i have a tremendously mixed feeling. that i was burying my friends and rating for words from reagan and it was a feeling on his part but they are made up of parts and on hold his record will be judged favorably by history but i personally, one thing the democrats love to do at their own political peril they love to tell how complicated things are it is too complicated there too simplistic and one of the reasons that reagan was effective to get elected and accomplish these things they
were simple but firm views the same about the man became the first national security advisor on those issues of the campaign who says governor, let's start by me asking you your view of the cold war? he said we win and they lose. [laughter] i think people had been waiting for a long time to hear that they did want to see another term of jimmy carter in a cardigan sweater and i found that aspect of regin electrifying and assure the the man who could sink that big could have been done better by his fellow citizens in the middle of a terrible health crisis. but the little things that you find out while researching.
>> sorry to interrupt so when you begin does a star with the research greg. >> yes in with fiction is of little things you realize that will be a scene or a chapter and one of the things i was completely bowled over was early 1987 reagan had the aids cabinet was relied at that point in the white house physician wanted him to have it because it was reliable and said the chances that he had the virus infinitesimal but he did receive a lot of transfused blood after the shooting in 1981 to the event it was not protected at that point so he did have the test and tested
negatively certainly he would have manifested within the six years but that was another opportunity for what he could have done to say i have actually fallen into a category to take this test and i had that today. but he did not want to do that. but this is seen in the book when the doctor's daughter who was much more liberal than the president. >> would your thoughts with the reagan and frustration handling of the aids crisis greg. >> like many people was good rationalizing things for convenience. as a way to rationalize why he didn't speak out he could point out that he was the head of a political party
that in those days there is a large faction in the republican party who believed aids was god's judgment on homosexuals in for the president to take a position on that would contradict the party but he could also say we are funding aids research as much as we can he could note that opinion was divided on the appropriate public health measures were so what should he say? but that really was rationalization he was made uncomfortable by much of that social agenda of conservatives he was a conservative but primarily of politics and fiscal issues.
he was opposed to abortion but almost never spoke out and when he did he never did anything about that social conservatives were disappointed in reagan he took no action and, the issues of gay-rights or aids he could say that isn't my job but this was in contradiction to his eagerness to use the of bully pulpit on other things so it was simply a failing of his i don't know if he would have ignited it is a failing but then it may again almost never admitted he failed the anything else that made him uncomfortable personally and politically and he chose not to do it. >> talk about him and
willing to admit failings and those that are pushing that trump connections with that is the common criticism that he was somewhat more willing at times quite. >> i will not compare reagan >> but here is an interesting thing about reagan with the iran contra so in his diary it is a reflective although he wrote the first entry on the day he was inaugurated 1984 the last was his last day of president 1989 so very clearly he is writing this for the presidential memoir and is aware that nosey people will be reading over official press some point so early on you get the sense this is written for the historian. a reads that way but like people who star diaries or
if you do interviews especially with a tape recorder going of first they are aware the tomas sees them carefully pick their words congratulations they forget to and they just are talking and in those moments it reads that way he was not self reflective so he doesn't get deeply into his own soul but he does say more by his reactions to other people and one of the things that comes out very clearly he is fully aware from of beginning the iran side of the story is we send them weapons they read these hostages weapons for hostages again and again he said okay we will send them a new shipment and they will release two more hostages now they don't but it is clear he and the standstill link so when the story
breaks he stands up in public and says five this was not arms for hostages said try to figure out what to make of it because these days with you to view can watch the video again and again. first of all he was an actor he is just acting apart. i don't think so because frankly it'll pinky was that good of an actor. [laughter] if he was he would not have gotten into politics but he had an ability the legacy in another political figures to convince yourself of things that necessary for you to believe even if there is a body of facts that contradict now he did have the figleaf were the weapons were going to tear ron and of hostages were held so
technically it was accosted to holders who were getting the arms but his political opponents tried this he would have ridiculed them but there is one other aspect of this issue that this is deep into his second term his eighth decade of life. i was talking to poindexter the national security advisor at the time when the scandal broke and he said he thought part of the reason reagan could say what he did after having done what he did he was beginning to be forgetful and he could forget the details i will cut him some slack on this because as a historian i have the written record in front of me and i can go down almost any day of his presidency this the 10:00
this at 1:00 and 130 per your president you are busy in the meetings where he was told the arms for hostages they may last 10 minutes and he was on to the next thing and in the middle of this year remember where you were setter what you were told but if you also become forgetful any way they said the fact he was forgetting stuff allowed him to say what he said. >> we have a few minutes left will take some questions from the audience to pass the microphone around. >> with regards to communism