♪ >> kimberly: i'm kimberly guilfoyle with juan williams, chris stirewalt, dana perino and tom shillue. it's 5:00 in new york city and this is "the five" ." the white house vamping up its communication seen today as the battle for the supreme court heats up. we are one week away from president trump announcing his nominee for the high court to replace retiring justice anthony kennedy. this as the president says he interviewed four candidates today and plans to meet two or three more. trump is rolling up his sleeves, gearing up for a fierce fight with democrats who are vowing to block his pick.
>> it's probably going to be vicious because the other side, all they can do is obstruct and resist in the whole thing is resist. maybe someday we'll be able to get along with the other side. i don't know. right now, it's only resist. that's all they want to do is stop things from happening. so they are going to try very hard. i think it's going to go quickly if i pick the right person. >> kimberly: amid growing concerns from the left that the new makeover the court could lead to the reversal of roe vs. wade ruling, legalizing abortion. the president wang end. >> are you going to ask your nominees beforehand how they might vote on roe vs. wade. >> that's a big one. probably not. they are all saying don't do that. don't do that. you shouldn't do that by importing conservative people on i'm very, very proud of neil gorsuch. he's been outstanding. his opinions are, you know, so well written so brilliant. and i'm going to try and do
something like that, but i don't think i'm going to be so specific and the question i'll be asking. i'm actually told i shouldn't be. >> kimberly: the main republican susan collins, swing voter in the senate, he vows to opposing nominee who would overturn the ruling. >> i believe very much that roe v. wade is settled law, as has been described by chief justice roberts. a candidate for this important decision who would overturn roe v. wade would not be acceptable to me. because that would indicate an activist agenda that i don't want to see a judge half. >> kimberly: obviously, dana, this is a key issue and of concern. both sides talking about it. the president in his interview with maria bartiromo saying he wouldn't necessarily ask that specific question. it's not something he personally is looking for food in a nominee.
>> dana: conservatives have said they are not looking for any nominee to say specifically how they would rule on any one issue but conservatives say they want someone who will rule based on how they, a strict reading of the constitution. not interpreting may be the founders could have thought about something and they didn't understand. this particular issue of roe v. wade is one where even ruth bader ginsburg, i read today for thoughts that actual decision being one that was probably outside the realm of what the constitution was saying. that is what riled up conservatives about the issue for a long time is that that decision itself was one that they would look back and say that was not decided well. that doesn't mean it isn't precedent or some people might call it settled law. so it is going to be a major sticking issue but go back and look at it. i remember when i was a spokesperson, like raj shah the deputy press secretary is going
to do full-time communications for this nominee. i was the spokesperson for justice roberts. i knew roe v. wade based on the general idea of what i knew growing up but i had never gone to law school. i was getting all these questions about the right to privacy. i remember going to the staff secretary at the time, bret kavanaugh, and saying can you help me understand. i thought that was supposed to be about abortion rights. everyone is asking about the right to privacy. he said it's a great question. let me walk you through it. that's when i first understand how the decision was actually made. i do think there is a lot of hysteria around her but it doesn't mean people don't feel extremely passionately. of course it's going to rally up the presidents base but it will rally up the liberals base as well. i think the president's right and he will probably be cautious and he will say this over and over, that i am not going to ask the nominee how he or she would rule specifically on this issue. but it will be the undercurrent of all of the fights.
>> kimberly: chris stirewalt. hello. >> chris: she is right. i will start with that. thank you for having me. happy independence day week. quinnipiac university has a poll out today and it looks that americans' attitudes on this issue. guess what. overwhelmingly, americans don't want to see roe vs. wade overturned. that is a 2-1 margin. even a majority among men. so the hysteria here is damaging because nobody is saying that. the way that abortion, the way that access to elective abortions has been rolled back in the united states hasn't been -- i am telling you. you are the lawyer. it hasn't been rolled back through big "we are going to knock it over." instead, states have found ways, it's an conservative states hae found ways to put limits on
access to abortion. texas, alabama. 20 states or so and which getting an abortion is almost impossible. it is extremely difficult. states have matched the voters in that places and done it. none of it has had to do with overturning roe v. wade. it's about taking a long trackback. conservatives started this 30, 40 years ago, a track back to before roe v. wade and how we can make it a federal issue. what i've read, saying that african-americans will no longer be welcome at elite universities. all of this stuff is worse than what i heard when robert bork was that nominee many moons ago. it is not good for the discussion. number two, they are creating a problem for democrats. they create this monster. they say that's terrible, cute evil human being is going to rise up out of the belly of the swamp and comment ruin your lives and this person is going
to come out when you know what they're going to say? seems all right. seems nice. that's what happened with roberts, gorsuch, these heinous expectations met with a nice, competent person and people say okay. >> kimberly: pain heinous expectations met with a nice person. sounds like the rhetorical hype, the vitriol. we've seen this happen. then you see in terms of the personal comes forward, like in the case of neil gorsuch, someone who has been well respected and well regarded. >> juan: i could go back to the same argument about merrick garland. he was highly respected and was not given a hearing, much less a vote. i think the thing here is that we live in different times. i was talking with abby huntsman today on "outnumbered." she said she had justice
scalia's sound on and he said his dad was approved 98-0. think about that. 98-0. competent jurists with a long record and a clear conservative and not one so-called liberal democrat voted against justice scalia. in 2018, we live in a situation is far different in terms of how polarized our country is. we have a far different president. my colleagues here on this panel say he could be a nice guy. of course neil gorsuch was a nice guy. don't worry about it. they have these terrible things. my pal chris stirewalt comes from d.c. and says what's all this black people won't be in elite insurgents. affirmative action is a big deal for the summer in court, and they set the rules for how schools can consider young people, especially young people from underprivileged conditions. the larger point in my thinking is that what you're looking at
now is approving a fifth conservative justice and polarized political times potentially creating a rubber-stamp on the supreme court for a conservative agenda. people say well, president trump says he's not going to ask about abortion. it is not a litmus test for the conservatives. let me read you a quote that comes from donald trump. he says "that'll happen automatically in my opinion because i'm putting pro-life justices on the court. it'll go back to the states, and the states and can make the determination." this is not a secret to liberals, and it's not a secret to conservatives. he wants justices who will undo roe v. wade. >> kimberly: i don't know if he wants to undo, but the pro-life floor in terms of their viewpoint, he was pretty specific with maria saying he wasn't going to ask that question or single it out. versus a constitutionalist that would uphold the constitution and construe and read the case
law. >> dana: he said that during the campaign, right? >> juan: rights. >> dana: he said i will work to nominate conservative justices. senator mcconnell has worked to confirm conservative justices. even if the president never asked them what the litmus test, that's the idea. >> juan: "the federalist" society. a >> kimberly: it's one of the factors he campaigned on. he promised to put justices on the bench like neil gorsuch, and that is why widely lauded by the republicans and conservatives that he put somebody in keeping with his campaign promises. >> tom: going back to what he said during the campaign, look at gorsuch, look at the way that was handled. the president, he has no problem turning up the temperature on issues but on this issue, i think he approaches things in a fairly normal establishment kind of way. he is appointing people that i think most people, he's going to appoint people most people are comfortable with and he's probably going to get a pass. it's not going to be 98-0 but he
will probably get it done. i'm not even concerned by the kinds of things susan collins says. the kind of judges that get appointed are not the kind of judges, like in the judge bork days that were advocates for overturning roe v. wade. most of them keep mum on their personal views on these things. i think it's going to be noncontroversial. >> dana: the left uses the idea of roe vs. wade being overturned as the right uses the idea of guns being abolished. it's a way to fire up the base. neither of those issues are actually on the table, but that's what people will use. we can be calm about the kinds of judges that will get out there and how they might rule. but this bin is going to be what it is. the formidable instrument infre around conservative nominees is in place because of how robert bork was treated in the 80s and conservatives figured it out, that they are not going to let this happen to another
nominee. the democrats had to do the same thing for elena kagan and sotomayor during the obama administration. judicial confirmations have been a real bright spot for conservatives with his administration. i think timing is everything in politics, and president trump seem to have great luck. >> juan: one last point which is i hear conservative say roe v. wade is pretty settled. it means you don't overturn things without cause. but what did we see from gorsuch? you say he is highly praised, kimberly. he came on a week or two, he voted to overturn a 40-year law in regard to how unions were able to collect so-called agency fees or dues from people who might disagree with their political agenda. work no one is saying these people aren't conservatives. these are the kinds of judges any republican president would
be picking because this has been a 40-your project, the most important thing to many, many, many conservatives. retaking control of the supreme court. they have not hit in that. >> kimberly: that was on the main deciding factors for many people. a quarter of them that cast a vote on the ballot for president trump. while democrats urge a call to abolish i.c.e. backfire on them in the midterm elections? details next. (vo) i was born during the winter of '77. i first met james in 5th grade. we got married after college. and had twin boys. but then one night, a truck didn't stop. but thanks to our forester, neither did our story. and that's why we'll always drive a subaru.
♪ >> dana: as the debate over illegal immigration rages on, president trump is hammering democrats pushing to abolish i.c.e., suggesting their antics might help republicans in the midterms. >> they are going to get beaten so badly. do you know, i.c.e., these are the guys who going to take ms-13 and they take them out. you get rid of i.c.e. coming or going to have a country that you're going to be afraid to walk out of your house. i love that issue if they are actually going to do that. between maxine waters and nancy pelosi and getting rid of i.c.e. and having open borders, and the biggest thing coming of open borders. all it's going to do was lead to
massive, massive crime. that's going to be their platform. open borders which equals crime. i think they will never win another election, so i'm actually quite happy about it. >> dana: not all democrats are on board. several lawmakers appeared to distance themselves from the far left calls to get rid of immigration and customs enforcement. >> abolishing i.c.e. will accomplish nothing unless we change the trump policy. the trump administration is embarked on a train wreck, a moral train wreck. >> if you abolish i.c.e., you have the same president with the same failed policies. >> there's a lot of other things you can do before we get to that point. >> what has to change out the policies and that people that are making these policies are making horrendous decisions like separating kids from their parents. >> dana: you heard democrats on the message now, chris, they are saying policies are not changing. it's amazing that the republicans went from being on defense on immigration over the family separation issue and the
immigration proposals failing to pass in the house to now the republicans are on offense because some democrats said abolishing i.c.e. is a good idea. >> chris: what you always want to do in a midterm election, any election, particularly midterm election, find your opponent, get out there and scuffed them up. democrats have had great support with republicans over the year. you find the dumbest things said by the dumbest person anywhere north america was a member of the opposing political party and then you say they are all todd aikens, they are all christine o'donnells. now it is the republicans turn to say all of you people, a tiny fraction of democrats feel this way. but everybody wants no borders and everybody wants to abolish immigrations and customs enforcement and you just keep saying it until it sounds like it's true, until people believe it even if it's not. that's why we hate politics. >> dana: saying that one of the ideas is to scuff up the opponent but instead the
republicans are like "why do you keep hitting yourself?" >> chris: it's a strange argument. last week they had the separation of families and now they are attacking i.c.e. chris hawn was on the radio show today. he said this is just like when republicans call for the abolition of the irs. i thought i had a good answer. >> dana: what was it? >> chris: but nobody likes the irs and everybody likes i.c.e. that's the difference. >> dana: it's an example of democrats being for obstruction of trump but not offering a credible alternative. if you're alternative is abolish i.c.e. and there is nothing in between you're talking about, then it seems like they've gone too far. >> kimberly: it doesn't make sense. it sounds coocoo. that's what he is saying. they are being obstructionist, they are against everything. they don't have solutions and ideas. it makes absolutely no sense from a public safety perspective to abolish it. and then want? crossing guards after school? they police the border?
i don't understand where they're coming from on this. i think it is so polarizing, off the charts that they are actually alienating people who were there. those who are like okay, they want to leave the party because of zoning to fringe, to extreme, even rhetoric from people like kristen gillibrand or maxine waters or nancy pelosi. whoa, whoa, whoa. this is not the democrat party i signed up for to begin with or that we know from years on back. what are they doing? then you see the recent elections of people coming forward to say this is not representative of values. and ideals we share. it's become kind of frightening out there in terms of some of the reactions and the pushback and calling for people to be assaulted and attacks and driven away. >> dana: a lifetime of abuse is what was recommended today. juan, you saw some of the commentary from yesterday, democrats saying tap the brakes. we are not really for that.
but it makes people that are either establishment or moderate democrats basically have to sound like the schoolmarm when what you have is an insurgent base, a restless base of progressives and not even some socialists saying actually we are not for playing around. we want serious action. is abolishing i.c.e. where they run on in the next couple months? >> juan: i think there's a lot of support for reforming i.c.e. i don't know about abolishing i.c.e. i think there are people who are so concerned, given the policy of separating children from parents that they say what is going on? why do we have what president trump during the campaigns that would be a deportation force going in and raiding homes, disrupting social events, going into workplaces, grabbing people. people are like, what is going on. we were talking earlier about going after the irs or something. i remember when conservatives
were calling the atf jackbooted thugs. you can imagine there are people on the left, not just on the left but even in the middle, they're like well, i know i am coocoo. >> kimberly: i didn't say you were coocoo. don't put words in my mouth. i said the things they are saying some coocoo, like abolish i.c.e. >> juan: here is the thing to keep in mind. mr. coocoo said i.c.e. was created 15, 20, right after 9/11. >> dana: before it was called something else. >> juan: we have a different organization. we took care of the crime. we certainly did if that was the issue, but we didn't have this singular group which was created to stop terrorism from being fostered inside the united states. it has a totally different purpose under this president which is why you hear even moderate democrats saying the problem is the president
policies and the way he is using i.c.e. if it's necessary to reform i.c.e. so that it can't be used to break apart families, break children away from parents, then do it. >> dana: it is not even i.c.e. that does the family separation if it is needed at the border. it's customs and border patrol. >> juan: gets next up. who grabs the kid? >> dana: anyway, socialist primary victory since political shock waves among our fellow democrats. the intensifying divide over the left's agenda up next. call one today. are you in good hands? i'start at the new carfax.comar. show me minivans with no reported accidents. boom. love it. [struggles]
show me the carfax. start your used car search at the all-new carfax.com. your mornings were made for better things than psoriatic arthritis. as you and your rheumatologist consider treatments, ask if xeljanz xr is right for you. xeljanz xr is a once-daily pill for psoriatic arthritis. taken with methotrexate or similar medicines, it can reduce joint pain, swelling, and significantly improve physical function. xeljanz xr can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis.
serious, sometimes fatal infections, lymphoma, and other cancers have happened. don't start xeljanz xr if you have an infection. tears in the stomach or intestines, low blood cell counts, and higher liver tests and cholesterol levels have happened. your doctor should perform blood tests before you start and while taking xeljanz xr, and monitor certain liver tests. tell your doctor if you were in a region where fungal infections are common, and if you have had tb, hepatitis b or c, or are prone to infections. xeljanz xr can reduce the symptoms of psoriatic arthritis. don't let another morning go by without talking to your rheumatologist about xeljanz xr. without talking to your rheumatologist with tripadvisor, finding your perfect hotel at the lowest price... is as easy as dates, deals, done! simply enter your destination and dates... and see all the hotels for your stay! tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites... to show you the lowest prices... so you can get the best deal on the right hotel for you. dates, deals, done!
dear humans, ♪ i stand here today not for myself, but, for every tail wager, sloppy kisser and curtain ninja. i stand here for each one of the nearly 4,100 dogs and cats killed in shelters each day, asking you to join our cause and help us make sure every best friend has a chance to meet one of their own. with best friends animal society leading the charge and your help, we can save them all. ♪ ♪ >> juan: welcome back to "the five." in the spotlight is on what some are saying is an apparent divide among democrats. senator tammy duckworth warning her party about moving too far to the left. this comes in the wake of socialist alexandria
ocasio-cortez's upset win over longtime democratic congressman joe crowley in new york last week. >> i think it's the future of the party in the bronx where she is. i think we as legislators need to listen to our constituency and get out there. i think what she did what she did the hard work. she pounded the pavement and she was out there talking to everyone of her constituents. >> are you concerned your party is going too far to the left to win in the midterms or win back the white house? >> i think you can't win the white house without the midwest and i don't you can go too far to the left and still win the midwest. >> juan: ocasio-cortez, former organizer for senator bernie sanders' presidential campaign firing back pointing out the policies to the left of hillary clinton won in several midwestern states. kimberly, what do you make of this? >> kimberly: it's compelling. she's a political figure. she exceeded the expectations. people were pretty much betting
that crowley was well-established, someone seen as part of the future of the democratic party in terms of leadership, perhaps succeeding nancy pelosi. taken out by a relative newcomer. some of the poly -- policies similar to bernie sanders. given the relative level, covered all across the network's this weekend in the sunday. they're looking to it as the momentum, enthusiasm generator for the party. i think it is fraught with problems in terms of being that far left is not necessarily, you know, mainstream election guarantees and wins. people go well, it seems fringe. not workable or tenable. therefore i am feeling even more alienated from the party. >> juan: chris and dana, walk through some things. let's say free education, free
health care, guaranteed income. i think a lot of people who are populist, they would identify with sanders and trump would say yeah, those are things we want. >> chris: absolutely. in fact when we talk about the shifting political dynamics inside the country, one of the things going on is the big move of poor and working-class white voters away from the democratic party into the republican party. they are going to bring the same demands with them when they get there. for those voters, things like republican lines about reforming social security, no. we're going to rollback obamacare. stop. as the republican base is shifting, they're getting new mandates from their folks. none of that is to say that it's workable for democrats to build a strategy around a 28-year-old first-time congresswoman from the bronx.
republicans would like to make her the face of the democratic party. i see the red socialist fist back there for added effect. >> kimberly: how did you miss that? >> chris: i'm going to wear my che guevara t-shirt. but my point being republicans want to turn her into the face of the democratic party. democratic leaders i am sure are biting their tongues. >> dana: they don't want to say anything bad about her but this really is that democrat's tea party moments. the energy and intensity and passion these young people are bringing to their movement and their party just might be enough for them to take back the house. it is certainly going to make primaries in places like where joe crowley is not really campaigning, doesn't show up to his debate, yes, they are going to lose. is it enough to form governing majority? you could ask john boehner or
paul ryan. >> juan: for our own che guevara. >> tom: the theme of all of our stories today is the democrats are pushing their luck on, yes, why do they keep picking far left people as their stars? elizabeth warren, however he picked, bernie sanders. they love these far left politicians but come on. look at her. i would vote for her. she knocked on doors. tammy duckworth was right. it's not even that big of an upset when you look at it. she knocked on doors. she did the work. >> dana: she posted a picture. they were saying she didn't work that hard. she posted the picture of the tennis shoes she wore walking her district and they were completely worn. she did a lot of miles on them. she really worked for it. the tea party republicans really worked for it too. >> tom: crowley, he was lazy. this seat was right before the picking end crowley was lazy and
he deserved to lose but she's not going to be a star, and the democratic party. she is going too far to the left. >> kimberly: people said hillary clinton didn't work hard enough in terms of skipping states. >> chris: i will say one word in favor of joe crowley. no one else will again. it was a rigged district. he inherited -- >> kimberly: trigger word [laughter] >> chris: he inherited that district from his political mentor, got in without having to run the first time and using the power of incumbency. that's more of a reflection of how crooked new york politics are. >> juan: slow down. maxine waters firing back at her critics, including her own party's leadership. you are going to see some fireworks when we return.
when my hot water heater failed, she was pregnant, in-laws were coming, a little bit of water, it really- it rocked our world. i had no idea the amount of damage that water could do. we called usaa. and they greeted me as they always do. sergeant baker, how are you? they were on it. it was unbelievable. having insurance is something everyone needs, but having usaa- now that's a privilege. we're the baker's and we're usaa members for life. usaa. get your insurance quote today. ♪ >> chris: maxine waters is not backing down.
in the interview, the california democrat pushed back against her party's leaders after encouraging people to confront people in the trump administration over the immigration policy. >> leadership like chuck schumer will do anything they think is necessary to protect their leadership. i was blessed with a kind of strength that does not allow me to be intimidated by the likes of donald trump. i think he does not deserve to be the president of the united states. let him say whatever he wants to say. he will not stop me. they want me to run away. they want me to stop talking. they want me to be quiet. but he can't do that to me. i won't stand for it. >> chris: at a los angeles rally this weekend, waters addressed a series of recent death threats. >> i know that there are those who are talking about censoring me, talking about kicking me out of congress, talking about shooting me. all i have to say is this. if you shoot me, you better shoot straight. there is nothing like a wounded
animal. >> chris: okay. who knew? the issue, i want to start with you, tom, the issue here is. >> kimberly: you are not supposed to use the word animal. convert that is not good. >> tom: we were chuckling about but no one is threatening to shoot her, are they? >> chris: have you been on the internet lately? it's a pretty gross place. >> tom: there are some people. she mentioned censoring me, shooting me. >> chris: i have been in -- the energy that is a gross and terrible place. it's wonderful too. >> dana: a meeting place. >> chris: republicans would love for her to keep talking. it's the democratic leadership that's trying to get her to not talk. >> tom: they are not going to stop her. she is interesting to listen to. i would have her on my show.
>> juan: you are a fan? >> tom: you have to admit she's interesting. there are interesting people and politics. donald trump is one. she is another. she is interesting. >> dana: it's getting to be too much. today we found out rand paul had a threat against his family and the capitol hill police arrested someone. this guy they arrested said he wanted to chop up his family and kill them with an ax. is it rhetoric? i am not for that kind of rhetoric. you can have free speech, and i don't think anyone is suggesting to maxine waters that she not be able to articulate what are the policies she things would be better. what is persuasive. but encouraging people to go out and harass others who are serving their country or who have been elected in a free and fair election, it's gotten to be too much. >> chris: she has done it, though. last week, calling for her --
she was calling for the world harass white house employees. maxine waters, a fixture from time immemorial. she's probably been in congress for 40 years. if you are nancy pelosi, you are looking at this. you have a problem. if a person drawing too much heat and playing into republican hands. how do you manage the situation as a leader because as tom points out, nobody is going to tell maxine waters to stop talking. >> juan: they are trying to. before i go on, let me say the republican congressman from texas was very brave. he said i don't agree with anything maxine waters had but it's outrageous that people are threatening her life. hats off to you. >> kimberly: she is the one calling for people to be attacked and harassed. >> juan: no, she never called for violence. she said she had no problem with shunning people, asking them to leave or shouting at them. >> kimberly: how is that conduct becoming? >> juan: i agree with you.
>> kimberly: the civility we've been talking about. she should not get a pass for that. >> juan: i agree. >> kimberly: take it all the way, three quarters but not all the way. when you encourage actions like that and rhetoric in that kind of vitriol, violence and physical assaultive conduct can ensue. i think it's bad. >> chris: we wouldn't say that the president is responsible for violence because he has used course terms. we wouldn't say that that, that she is to blame for violence, right? >> kimberly: i didn't say that. i said she is not to be commended for her rhetoric. i think it's divisive and uncalled for and totally lacking instability. >> chris: not laudatory. >> kimberly: not favoring signs. reciprocal civility. >> chris: if you are watching now, you're probably escaping the scorching, disgusting heat wave. how we here at "the five" are managing the sweltering temperatures next.
triple digits. it is so hot that the chicago fire department had to hose down the michigan avenue bridge after extreme heat expanded the steel. some in arizona are baking cookies on car dashboards. and people from oklahoma to buffalo are hitting the water parks. sprinklers and backyard pools. how are we managing to beat the heat? i will go first. i was out, the local pool in riverdale bronx. i sent out this picture. this is commits a bamboo shirt. i wrap it around my head and i keep my mom sunglasses on. i sent out the picture and everyone is making fun of me. >> kimberly: you think? >> tom: there is a serious issue. you have to protect yourself from the sun's harmful rays. i am very fair skinned. i don't know if you've noticed. >> kimberly: why don't you use an umbrella? >> tom: i do. i sit in the shade. >> dana: under the umbrella. >> kimberly: and sunscreen. >> tom: the cement reflects
up. you will get a sunburn from below. >> chris: there is being irish and then there is being irish. i am impressed. >> juan: i am worried for you. you look like tom of arabia in that picture. >> tom: "star wars" reboots. >> kimberly: waiting for jar jar binks to jump out. >> juan: i.c.e. might get you. looks like an immigrant to me. >> dana: oh! i tell my younger self if i could to where more sunscreen. one thing that is strange for me is when it's 95 degrees, where i grew up, it's hot but not oppressive. i've never gotten used to being in humidity. when it is 90 degrees here with 90% humidity, i dragged a little bit. i always try to make sure. i don't eat that much. not eat a lot when you're outside.
it will slow you down. also inside a locked. i've got to pretend like it's a rainy day and be inside. >> chris: maybe we should do the show outside sometime, dana. >> kimberly: tomorrow? >> chris: the thing for me, i am already hot all of the time. when it is 75 and you guys it'se like, it's a nice day, i am like dial it down. only get to this point, i am like whatever. pack extra handkerchiefs. >> tom: men get hotter? they wanted cooler? >> dana: men are not hotter. [laughter] >> tom: women are always like turn down the ac. they are always shivering. >> kimberly: don't say that to a puerto rican woman. to a younger self, i would say,
skin protection, also there is the idea of staying indoors. >> tom: don't you want to get out? >> kimberly: i like the heat. i enjoy. it feels good. >> tom: we are 98.6 degrees. why isn't it comfortable? maybe i should know this. our bodies are 98.6 degrees. why does it feel so terrible when it is 98 degrees outside? >> juan: do you want to explain it? i was a i am a big fan of lemonade and i think lemonade is good stuff. >> dana: you can't eat sugar in the heat. >> juan: i like heat. i have no problem with heat. the second thing is, in the big city, for inner-city kids, open the hydrant. turn on the hose. >> kimberly: go to central park. >> juan: in a way, it becomes
like a festival. it's an opportunity to get out and play. >> tom: it is nice when you see people out. wear your sunscreen. >> dana: and read a book. >> tom: in the shade, bamboo shirt, the whole deal. "one more thing" is up next. no matter who rides point, there are over 10,000 allstate agents riding sweep. call one today. are you in good hands?
but then something happened. we had to deal with spam, fake news, and data misuse. that's going to change. from now on, facebook will do more to keep you safe and protect your privacy. because when this place does what it was built for, then we all get a little closer. head-clearing, body repairing, titempur-pedic sleep. purchase a tempur-luxe or tempur-breeze mattress today and enjoy $500 off... or a free adjustable base upgrade.
experience the most highly recommended bed in america today. find your exclusive retailer at tempurpedic.com. armando: i am a veteran, i lost both legs in vietnam. announcer: as america's veterans face challenges, dav is there. armando: my victory was getting my benefits and a good education. announcer: dav helps veterans of every generation get the benefits they've earned. wade: i'm a veteran, i didn't want to admit it, but i have ptsd. announcer: so veterans can reach victories great and small. wade: my victory was finding help and learning that i wasn't alone. announcer: support more victories for veterans, go to dav.org. ♪
>> it's time now for one more thing. what do you have for us? >> i had something and you have something. >> these are our new hats, our fourth of july hats. just in time for the fourth of july. it's a special handmade hat to commemorate and celebrate american independence. these were made by irene valentine. she's the wife of a wounded warrior and an active member of the u.s. veterans motorcycle club and i met her and she was wearing one of these hats. irene valentine and it's a club that she started in 2007. u.s. veterans and see.net. if you want to learn more about their club and also to find more about -- speak of these are gorgeous and made really well. >> she said she could have done mike should have had a patent. kimberly even has her name on hers. >> fox news! >> that was very sweet.
>> i'm wearing it. >> i love it and i'm going to enjoy something in my new hat. all right. okay. dunkin' donuts, i'm a big fan of them, has a new invention, it's amazing. i tasted one before. they have these new doughnut fries and at first you are like sounds kind of weird and freaky until you put it in your mouth and you were like wow this is amazing. they did a limited trial. it was quite successful but now they are saying they are only going to do it for a little period of time. i predict that this will become a staple for america, these doughnut. >> it's like a truro. >> oh, yeah. >> i'm not kidding around. this may be the top five in kimberly's food court of delicious. >> you are not going to have when? >> are not having one.
>> it's so good. nationwide. >> you are not guilty. >> so i'm going to show you a 40-year-old picture. take a look. yes, that's me 40 years ago cutting my wedding cake. sunday was my 40th wedding anniversary. >> happy anniversary! >> here's a picture of the happy couple outside the church with our parents and here we are at the reception. now, take a look at this. 40 years later, here we are with our youngest son at his wedding just a few weeks ago. i know what you are thinking, that my wife is a lucky girl. but i also want to say thank you to her for 40 wonderful years, kids and grandkids. >> happy anniversary. >> we have almost like an eight
year anniversary. >> they are in a hot tub. a bear in a hot tub. this is like the reverse of goldilocks. when she gone into their bed. now they are getting into her hot tub because it's just the right temperature. >> that might be my soulmate. >> he might be. >> really. >> chris. >> we all mourn with the staff at the capitol gazette in annapolis, maryland, and the shooting that took place there and i would just recommend -- i would say this, and maybe i'm only saying this because i started as a small town newspaper guy, but i'm an enormous believer in local, local news. the most local news is probably, no offense, the most important. my encouragement to you, i say this is a veteran of the charleston daily mail, subscribe to your local -- at the look most local news source you can go to support those supporters. that's a great way to honor the sacrifices of those people at the capital gazette but it's
also good for the country. maybe give it a shot. >> that sounds very good. it's been a pleasure. set your dvrs and never miss an episode. hello, don scott. >> hello, kimberly. thank you. president trump is conducting interviews for the next supreme court justice while his longtime personal attorney is giving an interview that some speculate means michael cohen might cooperate with the special counsel and this week we are doing a check up on obamacare. this is "special report." ♪ >> don: good evening, welcome to washington. i'm don scott in for bret baier. president trump is narrowing the field of candidates for the next supreme court justice, a justice poised to give the court a solid conservative majority for years to come. as the president interviews potential picks, his formal personal attorney is giving an interview that have many wondering whether he's