f ground in new york tomorrow for the 92nd annual macy's day parade was 60 balloons and 26 floats and more than three millions dictator is expected t brave the cold. lots to be thankful for, i am thankful for the great debts to be right now. >> mark, thanks so much. welcome to the special edition of mohammed e. the trump agenda and a happy thanksgiving to all of you out there prepping and cooking. i'm intimate reshawn. tonight barack obama is latest attack on his successor, president chump trump. something like also have the latest on that michael and manatt issag up. and wait until you hear what th left is saying about thanksgiving. first, yesterday the new york times reported that back in the spring, president trump told
white house counsel he wanted the justice department to prosecute james comey and hillary clinton. even though the dag did not fil charges, democrats and the medi wasted no time making this out to be a major story. take a look. >> this is what happens in the garden country. the president orders the president of the the leader orders the prosecution and of his political enemies. >> i think this is a i think this is absolutely off the charts. donald trump is basically running his office like he's ahead of the t banana republic. >> if i had to channel some mikal richard nixon i think he g would tell this president is going too far. >> today i read the articles of impeachment and everybody shoul go read article two of it and how similar it is to what we've
seen trump do here. >> elected president what did president trump do here? comey and clinton are being prosecuted. this comes as president trump submitted his written llanswers robert mueller as the special counsel investigation appears t be winding down. tining us now with reaction from the health, fox news contributor shara carter and civil rights and criminal defense attorney, good evening, all. david, i will start with you. you're the attorney here. as i understand it, you think that the written answers by the president was not a good idea. i have had to join it in that. but the president and his attorneys made the decision tha he should do that. the special counsel, mohler is not limited to russia under the as it relates to the special counsel investigation. is it everything at play here i
terms of perjury and everything else he wants to look at? f >> absolutely. that's why i fundamentally tt disagree with the idea of submitting even written answers to the questions. under section six under . 4 of the special council regulation brand-new crimes are lreated simply by the appointment of the special counsel he has the authority to determine on his own, but the president has lied about interfered in the investigation or obstructed the investigation and he can charge a crime simply by virtue of being and unilaterally on his own decision without any other witness having contradicted the president. one of the problems that we are seeing is that everyone thinks that this is winding down, but is the president still in >> of course he is, he's in greater jeopardy now since he submitted his answers to the questions, this isn't really an investigation going on.
they're not looking for information from the president and no all they want to know, this is a group with an agenda. robert mueller made a choice when he chose his team.wh the whole universe of lawyers t choose from and he chose only lawyers with an agenda and into trump agenda, people who are against trump, hate trump, and really was a po result of the election. if the american people would have t confidence in the investigation. >> we just heard some of the sound of what's going on on the other channels jeffrey toobin who is a legal analyst saying that the attempt to prosecute clinton and comey is worse than watergate, but let's get to the facts here. is this such a bombshell report this new york times? it never says that the presiden directed that they be prosecuted . it's not even clear what he said . the lawyer, white house counsel lawyer says that the president never ordered anyone to prosecute anyone.
>> if you go back, judge and just watch h.president clinton' then candidate clinton i'm sorry , candidate hobbs rallies back in 2016, he said and i'm quoting from one of them i will ask to appoint a special prosecutor,ry we have to investigate hillary clinton and we have to investigate the investigation. those are his own words.co he saw, clinton he's talking about combing. this is from campaign promises that are stalled it included th senate so the new york times ha this bombshell that he ordered this, but he's been talking about a going back to his candidacy. the bottom line is the proposal goes nowhere and then there is no action carried out. we don't live in an authoritarian country. there are checks and balances. if it actually never comes to fruition, how is that the climb or a bombshell in any capacity. when the american people are
numbed by it because when you scream constitutional crisis, authoritarian dictator, wersel margate impeachable offense and you get to about a million is and over again people start tuning out because the hyperbole is just lost. you can't keep repeating that over and over again. >> that claim that authoritaria trumps attempt to prosecute clinton and comey. what i took a quote out of one of their statements, this is what happens when you attempt t prosecute your enemies. and, to your experience in what you have been reporting on for the last year when you attempt to prosecute your enemies wouldn't you say that these our counterintelligence investigation against trump, wouldn't you say that bringing paid for document by one candidate against another is basis for a bias towards. it's exactly what cnn and all o them are talking about.
>> absolutely. i was going to say that. the banana republic that they have been talking about is what happened when they started this investigation against candidate trump and 2016. they exonerated hillary clinton ithough there was a slew of information that they should have followed up on and at leas taken to the department of justice so they could be investigated to see whether or not it should be brought to the grand jury. no doubt what is happening here is this information in the media . what the president doesn't have the right inside the white hous to a talk to his attorneys and look, i've may have investigate and there is never been any evidence of crime. we have a mountain of evidence in you know pointing in the direction of hillary clinton, and he can't even question that because all of a sudden this is becoming some kind of he's taking some kind of prosecute prosecuted prosecutor authority.
it is a joke. >> what can the president do? >> i want to ask a question before i even get to that. that is, we never hear about eric holder, or read a lynch, nobody talks about their conversations with president obama or any of that. it's only with this president that the leaks are out there. to me it speaks of the establishment. david, i've got to go back to you with the question, what can president do. they keep talking about corruption, can we look at it? >> he has a right and responsibility too. he's the chief executive of tha branch. it is his justice department. he has a responsibility at all times to refer both comey and hillary clinton to the justice department to the full investigation. they both need to be investigated.
rasmussen poll, 46 of the public believe that comey should be prosecuted. there is something there. those were attacks on enemies. here there is real evidence of wrongdoing. criminal wrongdoing. it's preposterous that anyone should suggest that what comey did as fbi director with the leaks that went on in his agend was appropriate or certainly a breach of contract. >> we are short on time so i'm going to go to job. jail. what do you think this when you think the molar probe will be over? >> i think we saw the midterms come and go and he wasn't going to obviously release anything before then becausee he didn't want to seem political my comey did before the 2016 election. we have to see it went down to the president has submitted his
answers. myil question is will the ameri people accept anything outside of a direct line of collusion betweende the president and russian officials? republicans overplayed their hand with bill clinton in the late 90s and the way that they've they pursued that. bill clinton left office with a approval rating. you better have something tangible and not just the peripheral stuff or the america people and the court of public will. w >> is a going to end soon? >> i think it will wrap up soon. we need to wait and see what do attorney has discovered as far as the hearing. >> thank you. failed presidential candidate hillary clinton back in the new as the left are trying to compare the t use of personal e-mails to hillary secret server . yesterday rush limbaugh explain the difference between the two bret. >> i'm not going to talk about
the e-mails until it is proven that she created a secret e-mai servo and put it in her home, t hide the pay for play scheme an then tried to destroy it. i'm not going to talk about ivanka trump and her e-mails until somebody shows me that what she did got anywhere even close to what hillary clinton did and hillary clinton has bee exonerated. >> as of this week congressman mark meadows said the house gop plans on hearing testimony abou the doj investigation into alleged wrongdoing by the clinton foundation. joining me now with more is chairman fox news contributor and former clinton pollster and former press secretary for vice president pens mark water mark water. good evening, everyone.od
you have to give rush limbaugh his doom. that was really funny. talk about it, the private server in the bathroom. but i'm going to go to you first , doug because you have a democrat onset right now. does ivanka have a problem like hillary did? >> she has a problem, but candidly not the same problem a hillary.rv i don't think private servers should be used, but i think rus missed the point. if it's a private server was used in the private address, an classified information as far a we can tell may well have gone to our enemies in ways that. >> with hillary. >> yes. >> don't question. >> and that is more serious tha anything alleged everywhere else . >> it was simply that of mongo was appointments with families in a family e-mail, but what doug is saying is accurate. first of all, she didn't delete any e-mails did she?
>> no,n in fact our reports ar that she turned over all of her e-mails. and what we're seeing here, judge is the democrats are in the batters box. they're getting ready for an investigation investigation after investigation after investigation into the trump administration with the icing o the cake being an effort that will be made to try to impeach president trump. it's what they campaigned on. evil will say this is hyperbole we know what nancy pelosi is going to do is bigger, she put hendry waxmanan in charge of investigations during the bush administration and every mid-level staffer that the bush administration appoints go get lawyer to defend themselves against frivolous lawsuits whic he was the speaker of the house back during the bush administration. >> mark water, comey made a lot about intensity and hillary had no intent to violate the law even though intent isn't
required, but how do you compare the intent that ivanka has as it relates to the hillar situation? >> first of all there can be no intent. classified information does not go over your normal white house .gov e-mail account.ed there are special servers that are required for those. she had to have the intent to take itt off of those servers a put it on a private server. ivanka sending a few e-mails back and forth about family logistics and planning those kinds of things to government officials while she was transitioningin into office is intense, there's no classified information. every e-mail she sent to a government staffer while she wa transitioning and was automatically captured by the system. to keep mark, that is exactly the point that people are not recognizing. everything she did is captured there. if it were classified and it couldn't have gone through.
david, the thing i think is interesting is that jeff sessions announced last year about the clinton foundation it took them months to decide whether there was enough to loo at it and he found it and said i'm going to have the u.s. attorney i don't recall what state he is from look into the clinton foundation. i'm sorry, utah. so he is from utah. u.s. attorney and we haven't heard anything so mark meadows the sis hi guys, what's going o with this. they have a few more months of the going to look into it, what you think? from those who watch the amc documentary on monica lewinsky, they will think both clinton should be serving some time in jail. with this investigation, there may be a more production out of
meadows if you were to look at all of the money tom stier has put into democratic organizations to elect people that all they want to do is investigate this president and ultimately tried to impeach him. let's not forget what the core of stiers grassroots effort is and that is to impeach the president. in these final weeks that meadows is chairman of the committee and can call on investigations we ought to be able to get into things like that. >> what's interesting also, mar is that meadows, the house caucus leader is seeing his committee is also trying to secure testimony from whistleblowers who could've had more information about the clinton foundation, but do you think anything will happen in this department of justice. there is talk that the clinton global initiative got their status from none other than ...
>> i have a lot of hope in this investigation because the u.s. attorney huber who is leading ie is someone of impeccable credentials. if we have whistleblowers, this is not just about e-mail server and classified information is important is that is, this is bill clinton getting a $500,000 speech from russia at the same time uranium one was going through or the clinton foundation getting 14 and a hal million dollars in mysterious donations from companies and groups tied to uranium one whil hillary clinton was allowing most of our uranium to be sold to the russians. this has some serious attention from a national security perspective. >> doug you have to agree that the appearance of pay for play, i calledd the an organized criminal enterprise. >> i think i'm the simplest level, we ought to find out wha happened, what did the
investigation show. what have we learned. where do things stand? we have a right to know is people.en >> whatou you think happens if comes out and says i'm the u.s. attorney i'm not telling you. i'm not telling you into my investigation is over the policies that u.s. attorneys office are. >> that's fine, i would like to know that. i would like to know how the investigation is going on and where he stands. we've been greeted by radio silence and i think we have to know as american citizens where things stand. what he wants to share is just fine by me.ey >> david, they say that jim comey, when he was the united states attorney for the souther district of new york was involved in looking at the clinton foundation and then it was abruptly ended. >> the wrongdoing and self-serving of the clintons an all of their allies may very well be judgment judged by this
current crop of democrats and what they're going to try to do to president trump than what they will try to do to the cour and every other branch of government they can to bring in investigation, to bring in impeachment proceedings which will be very harmful to our country. >> rh, good to have you all on tonight. happy thanksgiving to you all. up next, a special edition of hannity continues. you want to believe what obama is saying about president trump. we will play the tape next. got directions to the nightclub here.
and if you get lost, just hit me on the old horn. man: tom's my best friend, but ever since he bought a new house... tom: it's a $10 cover? oh, okay. didn't see that on the website. he's been acting more and more like his dad. come on, guys! jump in! the water's fine! tom pritchard. how we doin'? hi, there. tom pritchard. can we get a round of jalapeño poppers for me and the boys, please? i've been saving a lot of money with progressive lately, so... progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us.
and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch
this week former president obam took a thinly veiled swipe at president obama saying america' progress is hindered by hate, anger, racism, and mommy issues. you can't make this stuff up. >> the reason we don't do it is because we are still confused, blind, shrouded with hate, anger , racism, mommy issues. >> in a 2014 interview with bush, hannity t asked him why he consistently refused to criticize his successors. take a look at his response. >> why did you make the decision ? i could sit here all day trying to get you to comment on president obama and i'm not going to get anywhere correct because i'mm why did you make
that decision? i'm sure you have a lot to say. >> we talked politics. you're engaged, what's going on? >> i don't think it's good for the country to have us former president undermined the curren president. i think it's bad for the presidency. >> joining me is larry elder an former chair of the council of economic advisers to president obama, thank you, gentlemen. it is rather shocking that the president would come out and criticize a president the way we've seen president obama do s i'm going to start with you, austin. i there is a book the presidents club, and it documents that unique relationship between presidents where you know, the sitting president will have communications with former presidents because their experiences heavy is so unique
having chaired the oval office and those from middle and credible decisions and burdens that they carry soio there is a relationship they have, but president obama from the last week or two that of the race, h took every day to go out and campaign against donald trump. he did it in the midterms. it's unheard of. is it good for the country as george bush just said? >> i think he can give makes tw things. i think for sure thanksgiving i tomorrow, in the spirit of thanksgiving, let's hope that everyone tones down the persona radical right personal rhetoric. >> and people say what what if referred to president obama as having mommy issues or daddy issues.
>> weight, judge, the thing is you know that this is in the context of the president of the united states now saying some outrageous things. >> whatt is he responding to? well, for example, president trump: president obama the mos ignorant president in the history of america sitting president obama was not born in this country. >> will here knows. as the birtherr so you're saying he's just a justified in continuing. >> no, he's not justified. i'm not saying he's justified h buouldn't do that. i respected george bush approac i think that's the approach president obama should take. vice president cheney was much more aggressive and negative about the obama administration for the entire time. >> okay, so i'll go to you, larry, what say you?
>> we're talking about the presidents and vice presidents and obama undid the signature achievement of george w. bush and that was the war in iraq.he when george bush left office he thought there was going to be a stay behind force of between five and 10,000 troops and ther was a vacuum. obama comes in, pulls out every single troop and george w. bush didn't say one word as things got worse in iraq as he predicted. itit t was certainly true that president cheney said something. president bush didn't say a word . ronald reagan retires, doesn't say a word. george w. bush goes to robert, texas, doesn't say a word. jimmy carter, bill clinton, barack brock obama never stop talking. that's a different perspective between republican and democratic presidents. >> austin he may have a point i seems to be the democrats.
>> i don't think that's quite accurate.as >> what wasn't accurate? >> donald trump is in the sense that barack obama did not mention president trump by name. president trump, you know who h was talking about. >> , trump takes that from president is all campaign was built on personal insult of his opponents.ot >> okay that's not the issue with all due respect. we are talking about a preside who comes out during midterms and during his last days to continually attack the presiden of the united states. >> campaigning is something different. >> campaigning is different. ii will give you the last word,
larry elder. s> if it makes you any happier, austin one president trump retired in january of 2025 with his 50 million twitter follower he will probably have a thing o awo to say about his successor. >> we'll see about that. >> happy thanksgiving. a shocking crime committed by a man who entered the country illegally. take a listen. (female speaker) save big on great gifts at bass pro shops' and cabela's black friday sale. like men's 5-pocket jeans for under $10. and this humminbird side-imaging sonar gps and chartplotter for under $550.
>> welcome back to the special edition of hannity, the trump agenda. new developments surrounding th domestic violence allegations against attorney michael evan hadi who could be in the 2,020 th upon him. christian fischer has all the latest in washington. >> la prosecutors have decided that they will not prosecute hi
on felony domestic abuse charges . he was arrested last week on felony to passive violence afte his girlfriend told police that he iedragged her by her arm acr the bedroom floor. he claims the accusations are coming completely false and a fabrication. he tonight issued a statement saying i'm thankful after affair , careful and thorough investigation i have maintained my innocence and the moment of my arrest saying this thanksgiving i e am especially thankful for justice. a spokeswoman for the district attorney wouldn't say why prosecutors plan to take the document supporting their decision were not release because the case isn't over yet the city attorney is reviewing it in deciding d. >> thank you.
now turning our attention to th issue of immigration were were learning more about the suspect who was caught on dashcam put i on a shootout with arkansas police earlier this month. warning, this video is disturbing. take a look. >> shots fired. >> it turns out the suspect 29 c -year-old is a recipient of he is now ioin custody on serious charges. get this, the obama administration didn't support him despite a misdemeanoris cri back in 2015 that brought him t isis attention.
thankfully, we now have a president prioritizing border security. in fact, presidents per trump i even sparring with chief justic chief robert on the issue of immigrations and the courts and calling out obama judges in places like the liberal ninth circuit and the lower court in california where the presidents new asylum roles in response to the caravan were just blocks by a district court judge and adding that they have a much different point of view than th people who were charged with th safety of our country.nt the president wasn't done writing we need protection and security.y. these rulings are making our country unsafe, very dangerous and one wise. while the chief justice issued statement staunchly defending the s federal judiciary in response to the ask yourself, why is it that so many of these cases like the travel ban and
the new asylum roles are filed in district courts reviewed by the ninth circuit court of appeals.g joining us now with reaction michelle malkin and mark for hi very think you promote both for being here. mark, i'm going to go to you. the president clearly is frustrated. the play to put a hold over the contemporary restraining orders on the president immigration rules are being fought in court reviewed by the ninth circuit. tell us why that is. >> the ninth circuit is very liberal and frankly with regard to president trump, they've actually gone overboard and basically, they're acting while wesley and our system has been slapped on by the supreme court. i think the president needs to pursue a longer-term policy where they challenge not just the ruling itself in this case, but they need to challenge
before the supreme court of the very idea that these lower courts can issue nationwide injunctions rather than an injunction just targeted to the people in the case. essentially, we have a district judge in san francisco who has veto over national policy. that's an absurd to do that can't be allowed to continue. >> it's nothing new, michelle. i mean they go to these distric court judge, but you've got a federal district court, but a district courtng judge making a decision that impacts the entir nation. we saw it with the travel ban and we continuously see it, wha is the thinking there? >> its judge shopping for sure and you're right, judge jeanine it has gone on a long time. no one is more in depth of doin that kind of shopping than open borders immigration lawyers. it's not just at the circuit
court of appeals level. you've mentioned at the outset in that case, a judge had had that violence alleged shooter i his courtroom and reduce the felony charges down to a misdemeanor. he had been on a second crimina charge in front of the courts and it's because those two misdemeanors did not meet the three misdemeanor arbitrary threshold that the obama administration had put for illegal aliens that ice didn't get any notice and wasn't able to put a detainer on him and th first place. that is just one level of the problem with the judiciary because the immigration courts are rife with all these open borders radicals who would rather let all of these people loose in addition to having people come into the country on these caravans. they get amnesty to become
democratic voters. >> mark, the final on this and want to talk about justice roberts, but the idea is that the obama administration could create these thresholds where, we're not going to cooperate with insurers, sanctuaries duties. he gets a few crabs with no problem. how are we going to change that? >> that's a good question. congress is going to have to ac because what the administration is trying i to do is to punish sanctuary cities by saying we'r going to cut your money off. they have sued successfully so far saying that the statute of legislation does not give the executives that authority. congress needs to be very cavalier and it is in congress this court. starting in january arnothing w get done. i'm afraid looking at the recor of the past two years, even in this lame duck session which will be in december, congress when the republicans still have
majority in both houses, they'r just not going to move begin sanctuary cities or any of thes other issues like to get michelle, i will go back to you on the issue that is in the subject of the injunction and that is the president saying were not even going to consider asylum and lets you come in to an appropriate port of call. now i have the chief justice of the united states supreme court actually coming out and basically pushing back on the president saying there's no suc thing as an obama judge or a clinton judge, or bush judge. the judiciary never gets involved in politics. this is unheard of and by the way john roberts wasn't the person at issue here, he just decided he was going to stand u for his judges. is the supreme court now becoming politicized to? >> i really don't appreciate that kind of compulsion to do
this kind of virtue signaling and posturing and justice roberts has done this before i think that president trump has treated it exactly as it should be. the policy issue here is a serious one and thing goodness we have a president who is trying to tackle it. our asylum system is a joke. both mark and i have covered this for a long time. the people, the radicals who ar funded by left-wing groups in the immigration lawyers lobby know that it's not over until the alien wins in with asylum fraud, you have all of the enabling going on andot it is n fair to people who are legitimate assignment asylum claimants. and it's not fair to anyone els waiting in line. >> quickly, i have 30 seconds left. immigration is up sharply and the most important issue in the united states now. first of all, how is it that we
have caravans when everybody knows where sending the militar to the border and now, you know who is pushing them? >> these caravans happen becaus it pays. it's worth it, the odds are really good that if you stick with this caravan and make it t the border and, attend the seminars telling you the magic words to say, you will be let into the country. you may not get asylum, but it doesn't matter you get past the border and you're home free, that is the goal.. >> thank you so much, michelle and mark. next on the hannity special. kansas liberals calling thanksgiving racist. unbelievable. we'll be right back. tory. when we were dating, we used to get excited about things
like concert tickets or a new snowboard. matt: whoo! whoo! jen: but that all changed when we bought a house. matt: voilà! jen: matt started turning into his dad. matt: mm. that's some good mulch. ♪ i'm awake. but it was pretty nifty when jen showed me how easy it was to protect our home and auto with progressive. [ wrapper crinkling ] get this butterscotch out of here. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. there's quite a bit of work, 'cause this was all -- this was all stapled. but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us.
>> judge jeanine: welcome back >> welcome back to the special edition of hannity, the trump agenda. what is thehe matter with our universities? t can't they stop teaching our kids to hate america for just one holiday? now not even thanksgiving is safe at the university of orego some student groups planned an event called thanks, but no thanksgiving.ut the website kansas for form one to ten asked them if they believe that thanksgiving is racist. take a look. >> this is a racial history or anracist history to thanksgivind that should probably be addressed more. >> sure, there are racist aspects of it. >> were celebrating taken away land from natives. >> joining us to talk about thi craziness, civil rights attorne
and nra contributor demo and yo know. you know, i got to tell you i a so sick of people getting triggered by ridiculous things. they find prejudice wherever they live. it's like all around us. so i'm going to let you to have at it. what is going on with young people today? >> without question,. >> darrell, you go first. >> certainly, judge a have to tell you without question the oregon ducks are off base on this one and we should say the ducks are off the plantation right now because they are way way off without question, that kid doesn't speak for most people. most people see tomorrow is a time with family, football and fun, people getting together, those students are not in any type of way on point with what thanksgiving means to most americans.ng most americans are traveling to be with each other and to enjoy each other's company soth there
no way that those people speak for anybody else of the people on the oregon campus. you make a good point it's abou family, football, eating and talking. nobody celebrating me to fill i from somebody, were great people , but what you think, dan? >> i'm glad darrell feels that way, but they don't speak only for the oregon ducks. when you go on college campuses views like this are everywhere. judge, liberalism is a forest fire, it burns down everything it touches. they will ruin any holiday they get their hands on by going to the racistra well every time. there was over the black panthe concert costume. there was a controversy over whether it's appropriate to wea that because the character who played him happen to be black. these are absurdities.
this is outrageous.rv >> is, this is not a conservative or liberal issue. >> yes it is. north and south, people are getting together and having fun. they're traveling to be with on another. >> i think we all agree. >> i'm happy to be with daryl, but judge, darrell is wrong. darrell, i love you man, but this is a liberal thing. i promise you there is no conservative out there trying t make the case had thanksgiving dinner tomorrow that thanksgiving is a racist holiday . i promise you. >> syngas, i have to tell you i walked down the street for dinner and i had chick-fil-a, sixth avenue and 46. our next story is about just that restaurant. this ist. a campus report so-called education is in new
jersey are refusing to bring chick-fil-a to campus despite student wishes. which college said the ban was about promoting inclusion for all people. now, darrell, does chick-fil-a, not does that not include everyone? what do you think, darrell? >> i think certainly they have policies of their own is a corporation, but i don't think were at a point where we hold most corporations to societal values test. and most importantly, i think they should've asked their studentsit is obvious that some in the administration made at decision i think the university university needs to involve wer most able and society in societ are at right now. they are good at what they do. >> dan? >> you're probably laughing for the same reason i was. the reason for not including
chick-fil-a on campus is inclusion? does that even make any sense?to how brain-dead yet to be to put out a statement like that. were all about excluding chick-fil-a. how do you say that with a straight face? >> what i want to know, dan, wh is excluding the chicken of problem? or including that chicken?ig >> judge, i start trying stop trying to figure it out 20 year ago. let's tolerate everybody. except people we disagree with. let's include everyone except everyone you disagree with. stop trying to figure it out. >> i have to tell you guys, you know what it tells me? that particular story tells me it's the university and not the students because i know a lot o young people here love chick-fil-a. they have thesee deep-fried waffle potatoes that are out of this world. :they have great everything.g it comes from the teachers and
the university, that's why the kids are being brainwashed. it comes from the university. they say we don't want chick-fil-a on campus. >> i need the student used to speak up again. chick-fil-a is one of the few corporations that really has some values. they close on sundays and let their people go to church, we may not agree with them on everything that they have been leader on rights and values in our country. >> great having the two of you on tonight. thank you for staying with us for this hannity special, trump agenda. stay tuned for some final thoughts.
simple steps save lives. learn more at poolsafely.gov. >> judge jeanine: welcome back to the special edition of "hannity": trump's agenda. unfortunately, that is all the time we have for this evening but before we go, christmas is right around the corner, so think about that special someone who may like a copy of... my number one "new york times" best seller, "liars, leakers, and liberals: the case against
the anti-trump conspiracy." i will be back here hosting on friday night. have a great day tomorrow. happy thanksgiving. lisa boothe is in next for laura. >> lisa: thank you, laura. i'm lisa boothe in for laura ingraham. this is a special thanksgiving eve edition of "ingraham angle." coming up, politics is not taking a break for the holidays. republicans going after the clinton foundation before they lose control of the house. u.s. troops are spending thanksgiving protecting our border from reports of a human stampede by caravan migrants.fng details coming up. shocking new videos reveal what college students really think about thanksgiving. spoiler alert: they say it'stu racist. plus raymond arroyo and laura breakdown thanksgiving dos and don'ts. they also talk to a real live turkey expert. but