Skip to main content

tv   Hannity  FOX News  March 20, 2019 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT

10:00 pm
is going up they are but a little early to do this but coming next in nine seconds. >> sean: if you want a real surprise, you are doing "hannity" with a couple of drinks. >> tucker: i hope i can do that. i want to be your fill in guy someday, serious. >> sean: okay, done. >> sean: thanks, tucker, great show, welcome to "hannity". breaking tonight, john solomon, we have major evidence of election collusion in 2016, real evidence to back it up, this collusion with hillary clinton and top ukrainian government official that wanted her elected. we will have all the details coming up with john solomon. but before we get to the top story, ask yourself a couple of questions, will this be investigated for three years? two by mueller and one by the fbi, and it mueller's case, that merry band of democratic donors? while the mainstream media even cover what i a damning story
10:01 pm
with tapes? we will not hold our breath, that story and much more tonight. we first turn our attention to "hannity watch", the crop of democratic hopefuls. democrats pushing to give 16-year-olds the right to vote, you you can't drink till you're 21, to stack the supreme court so they get enough justices that think their way and will legislate from the bench and proposing an end to the electoral college. now what is happening, we will break it down. this is a scary attempt by politicians to centralize power and control the lives of you, we, the american people. and right now, it is the party line among almost all the radical democrats running to be president in 2020. a blatant, dramatic frightening attempt to alter america in ways unrecognizable, forever destroy the greatest
10:02 pm
economic creation system in the history of mankind. now, last night during the friendly interview, so-called comedian jimmy kimmel, our old friend, senator kamala harris became the latest democratic candidate to express support for an end to the electoral college. take a look. >> senator warren, elizabeth warren had a town hall last night and she said she thinks we should do away with electoral colleges. do you agree with that? >> i think that it is open to discussion. i mean, there is no question that the popular vote has been diminished in terms of making the final decision about who the is president of the united states and we need to deal with that. so i'm open to the discussion. >> sean: now senator harris, elizabeth warren, kristen gillibrand, and many democrats h support an end to the constitutional process by which we have always elected the president of the united states. so why is b this a big deal? we turn quickly to a "hannity" history lesson on the electoral college to give you an open explanation. when our constitution was drafted in 1787, the framers of
10:03 pm
the constitution, they sought tn rectify what was a very challenging conundrum. how do you create a limited, central government strong enough to defend its people against serious threats but decentralized enough to prevent consolidation and subsequent abuse of power? the result was a constitution filled with checks, balances, shared power between the individual states and the federal government. the electoral college is a product of this system, givingta the states the power to conduct elections and choose the president. as a result, each state holds some power in determining the executive branch. let me explain. without the electoral college,ow and our framers knew this, small areas with dense populations, in other words, new york, new jersey, illinois, california, would monopolize the keys to the white house. and look at how all four of those states have been destroyed by the people in those stateso that elected liberal socialist politicians.
10:04 pm
everywhere else, in other words, all of red america, pretty much antotally would be ignored. don't take it from me. listen to what obama's former campaign manager had to say about this. take a listen. >> from a campaign manager's standpoint when i ran president obama's campaign, we would never go to a small state if there was no electoral college. you will go to the major markets, you would not go to iowa, montana, new hampshire. i think any proposal about getting rid of the electoral college,i i understand the concern and the concern is real that we've had two presidents get elected without winning a popular vote, but i agree with charlie. that is not going to happen. >> sean: in other words, power would be totally consolidated. thisis scenario, the framers, te founders, feared the most. one of the reasons the court of thomas jefferson, he hated cities, writing they are harmful to the morals, the health and liberty of man. he was smart, way ahead of his time. and for hundreds of years, the
10:05 pm
electoral college played an integral role decentralizing power of the central government, keeping the united states united. would those red states stick around and be in the united states if they kept losing to new york, new jersey, california and illinois? i tend to think not. democrats don't share the values of our framers. they want power for themselves, and they want it at all cost. that is why every major proposal is now pushing begins and ends with their power and a centralized federal government that they control. government-run health care, a complete takeover of the health care industry, yes, run by the state. kamaland harris and others, they want to end all private health care. that impacts 200 million americans. i thought they were pro-choice. government-run education. now they are going to add pre-k eand college education. they haven't done a better enough job with kindergarten through 12th grade. and they will have government consolidation of all guns and gun laws. government-run clean energy
10:06 pm
through the government takeover of the energy sector. in other words, they will take it over. no more oil and gas, proposal for ten years or we will die. government-run universal income, government paid retirement, government paid for vacation, government-sponsored healthy the 2020 candidates even want government to control means of production. in other words, the socialist green new deal, they proposed they will tell you how to run your business. government promises for everything and for everybody, you will never have a worry in the world, but you also give up all of your freedom. and all of the wealth creation systems we have built up to this point in our history. we will explain how even the poorest in america have it so much better than so many other people around the globe.n a mini monologue detailing this
10:07 pm
destruction, what do social later in the program, something we will actually do the math and tell you how much your paycheck the democrats want to take. it is pretty close to 100%. if the democrats get their way, this country as we know it, it is going to be over. it is done. it will not be the united states of america as we know it. first, we turn the "hannity watch" on the mueller which i didn't get to breaking news. another sign of the probe is in its final stage, special counsel attorney filed an extension for the court filing related to the paul manafort case because they were too busy with "the price of other work." maybe they are writing a report after nearly three years. today, president trump says he wants to report to be available for all s americans. take a listen. >> let it come out. let people see it. that's up to the attorney general. we have a very good attorney general. man.s a highly respected we will see what happens. i want to see the report.
10:08 pm
you know who wants to see it? with tens of millions of people that love the fact that this is the greatest economy that we have ever had. i know nothing about it. i know he is conflicted. and i know his best friend is comey, who is a bad cop. and i know there are other things, obviously, you know, i had a business transaction with him that i have reported many times that you people don't talk about. i had a nasty business transaction with him and other things. i know he put 13 highly conflicted and very angry, i called them angry democrats, in. with all of that said, i look forward to seeing the report. >> sean: here is the ironic thing, thanks to democrats after the impeachment of bill clinton, the president has no say whatsoever in the decision whether to make the findings public. the attorney general and only the attorney general will decide. tonight as we wait the mueller report, and want to get back to
10:09 pm
how this began. this is important because people to absorb exactly what this is all predicated on. according to then-lead fbi investigator peter strzok and top lawyer lisa page, after nine months of an fbi investigation beginning in july of 2016, they found no evidence of trump-russia collusion. nine months before mueller. so after the president rightlyly fired comey, which comeyl, acknowledges the president has the right to do for any reason or no reason at all, than the deputy ag, rod rosenstein, he appointed the special counsel, his friend, robert mueller, to continue the fbi's investigation into so-called collusion. remember jeff sessions recused himself. now mueller's mandate was as follows, investigate "any links and/or coordination between the russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of president donald trump." and this part that everyone seems to forget. "any matters that arose or may
10:10 pm
tarise directly from the investigation." now we have seen robert mueller prosecute various trump associates for process crime. reese mueller prosecute paul manafort for crimes that have nothing to do with his timc with trump, russia collusion, and you work for the trump campaign. we watch mueller a troll farm filled with people who will never be extradited and tried in the united states to face justice. and russian intel people. they will never be tried. they will never be extradited. but oddly enough, we have not seen mueller prosecute matters that arose from or involving democrats or clinton allies. and the mueller investigationmcr into whether the clinton campaign used money and used and funneled that money to a spy, christopher steele, who hated donald trump, who then colluded with russia in the development of the dirty dossier. we know that dossier is filled with russian lies and ukrainian lies and total propaganda.
10:11 pm
where's the mueller investigation into fisa to be as? after all, it's clear and compelling and incontrovertible evidence that a trump campaign associate was spied on by federal officials, the bulk of the information in the fisa application was that hillary bought and paid for russian dossier. by the way, they never told the court that hillary paid for it. where'sha the mueller investigation into the coordination and the effort of the state department to use the clinton bought and paid for russian dossier to take down donald trump, who they wish didn't rode the election? where's the mueller investigation into uranium ura? a member that? russians in the united states because we had an fbi agent in there. they were reporting bribery, kickbacks, money laundering, all sorts of racketeering. bill clinton at the time took a massive payment from a russian bank related to uranium one and met with vladimir putin and
10:12 pm
russia. we know the clinton foundation raked in about $145 million from uranium one executives. we know hillary clinton as secretary of state, she was one of a number of people signing off on the deal, the uranium one deal. that's right, giving 20% of america's uranium to russia and britain, by the way, the foundational material for nuclear weapons and we don'tou have enough on our own. we import uranium. where's the mueller investigation into this new story which we now get to tonight from john solomon?o we know tonight that a high-ranking government official in ukraine actively tried to benefit the clintonti campaign n 2016 -- this is breaking tonight according to solomon -- ukraine's top prosecutor has opened a criminal probe into whether senior law enforcement officials in that country tried ffto sway the u.s. election, influence our election, to help hillary clinton win. a tape recording released by a
10:13 pm
member of the ukrainian parliament captured an official talking about leaking paul manafort of official records in the middle of thehe 2016 election for the stated purpose f to help hillary clint. the ukrainian court even ruled the leak was an improper effort to influence the american election. that's not all. according to this report by john solomon, you ukraine's top prosecutor accused the u.s. embassy of interfering and corruption prosecution inside the country, including one probe into the alleged misuse of an american aid. a letter service from a senior member of congress for secretary pompeo accusing the current u.s. ambassador in kiev badmouthing the trump administration. this is exactly what mark meadows was talking about tuesday on this show. where's the mueller investigation into these matters? after all, it's already under investigation in the country of ukraine. there is a tape recording that has all this information. where's equal justice under our laws? where's equal application of our
10:14 pm
laws? there was no trump-russia collusion, as we now know from the fbi told us after nine months. then of course, the house intel committee told us on the senate intel committee told us, and as congressman nunes pointed out many years ago -- by the way, 2014, among many people to do this, russian interference, he told us, is a real threat. he warned us in 2014. not to the trump campaign, instead, by the way, power-obsessed clinton to may have been the most susceptible. that is where the real collusion ends up being. this week, big news, we learned that former obama white house counsel greg craig may soon be facing charges linked to mueller's probe. oh, may be a little equal justice. here withe. the full report, "te hill"'s john solomon, also former u.s. attorney joe digenova, former assistant attorney general, victoria toensing. john solomon gets a lead
10:15 pm
building with his story. i want to get to the tape recordingll released by a member of the ukrainian parliament. let's talk about the tape recording. >> we don't know much about it.d it is floating around ukraine. we know the general prosecutor of ukraine, our equivalent of the attorney general, came on our show this morning as ofor te following. there's enough evidence for me to open up a criminal investigation into the illicit effort by a ukrainian try to influence the united states elections in favor of hillary clinton. that's a profound statement coming from the top law-enforcement official in ukraine. why is it important? there is a court in ukraine that has concluded that ukrainian officials leaked paul manafort's financial records to try to sway the u.s. election. if you hadn't heard anything about that in the american press, that ruling occurred recently. a parliamentary member comes out and says, i have a tape of the law enforcement officials saying they did it specifically to help hillary clinton. that becomes the foundation of the ukrainian investigation. >> sean: you talk to people that are this tape, correct?
10:16 pm
speak of the prosecutor was offered the tape and said it was important enough on good enough evidence to warrant opening the investigation. so the tape, the court ruling, top prosecutor in ukraine says there was a foreign power, us, ukraine, trying to influence the u.s. election to help hillary clinton. that is the news today. >> sean: let me get a joe digenova. sorry, joe, she's the better house. victoria, let's start with you. we listed all the things that mueller has an investigative and should have investigated and you were instrumental in getting the uranium on fbi spy that knew all the bribery, extortion, kickbacks, money laundering that was going on as it relates to the uranium deal and the money kicked back to the contents. as you look at what mueller never investigated, your thoughts? >> guys who else was not ever contacted? me or my client, doug campbell. that is john huber, who jeff sessions said was supposed
10:17 pm
to be investigating uranium one. we all accepted long ago, sean, that mueller was not going to investigate anything that was on -- how could he, when -- i agree with the president, 15 angry democrats are nuts prosecution team. that was going to have to come owith a new attorney general, d god bless bill barr, he's there, and i trust him to open a grand jury into that matter. >> sean: joe, look at the big picture. we know the same people that rake the investigation into hillary, even james baker, the top fbi lawyer under james comey wanted to indict her under the espionage act, then the same players, the investigator for nine months, finds nothing. but we do find evidence of russia collusion and russia influence our election, and it'l hillary bought and paid for a dossier. had reporters spreading it, before the campaign, "the washington post," david corn, michael isikoff. influencing the election.
10:18 pm
then we have of course the fisa. how is it possible, with all that evidence and none that has serviced so far interim pipe ani russia collusion, that mueller can look in the mirror and say that this isp a fair investigation and we have equal justice under the law? >> i do not know how it can be called a fair investigation for that very reason. it is quite obvious that there were crimes committed by people associated with the clinton campaign, with the democratic national committee, with fusion gps, and other people. those things, for all intents and purposes, for all that we know, have been ignored. they were certainly ignored by mueller at they have been ignored thus far by the department of justice, as victoria said, nobody knows what john huber has done or is doing. most of us think that when jeff sessions appointed him, it was a head fake. sean, here's the thing that's really changing. now we know that not only was
10:19 pm
the russian collusion to refute fusion gps and through the mi6 guy and all that, but now we know that the ukrainian officials were deeply involved in trying to help hillary clinton through this and we also now know that the current united states ambassadoa ambassador, has badmouthed the president of the united states to ukrainian officials, and has told them not to listen or worry about trump policy because he is going to be impeached. this woman needs to be called home to the united states for consultation immediately. >> sean: we know now with the new transcripts, joe, i want tot ask you and everybody else. the transcripts, we know john huber, horwitz, i don't know anything about this new attorney general, if you will do his job or not. we do know certainly, we know everybody was worried about the dossier by bruce ohr in 2016.
10:20 pm
they can't verify something that is unverifiable. when the author of the dossier says, i don't know if it's true, how can the fbi ever verify it but use it as a fisa application, presenting it as truth and not even telling the court she paid for it? >> is a profound question that goes to the heart of whether the fbi and justice department are doing their jobs correctly. let's talk about a double standard that is so apparent today. the second we have a dossier floating around the cia, fbi, all these guys ran up to the hill and couldn't wait to tell the gang of eight, there might be a russian collusion thing going on, foreign power, ukraine comes forward and admits theyer have evidence that they have tampered in the election, i can't find a lawmaker that was contacted by the cia, fbi, anyone, to alert them. >> sean: where is this going? i want to ask joe and victoria. victoria, you first. >> i think we have to get more
10:21 pm
information. i know that john will be giving you morest information, more stories in the very near future about this. this v is a disgrace and guess what? when we come back again another day, i will tell you how hillary planted when she was secretary of state and promoted all these women to eastern europe posts so that they could run the flag when she was running for president. >> sean: we will haveni a test, transcripts, fisa warrants, 302s, gang of eight, so much coming that backs up everything we reported for you to speak of to all open up finally and we will have ail nicer second partf it by calling home the united states ambassador to ukraine, marie jovanovich, for consultations and to answer a slew of questions about her conduct an assault on the president of the united states. >> sean: while the new attorney general do his job? >> yes, he will.
10:22 pm
he will. >> indeed heeard will. >> sean: all right. >> he's doing his job right now. >> sean: thank you both. john, great reporting. you won't believe what 2020 nominee kirsten gillibrand wants to give illegal immigrants. larry elder, mike huckabee next. later, we sent lawrence jones to the lone star state to see what texans really think of robert francis beto bozo or rourke. the reason why o'rourke ate dirt. literally, after he lost to ted cruz. i'm not making that up. literally. straight ahead. ♪ -looks great, honey. -right?
10:23 pm
sometimes you need an expert. i got it. and sometimes those experts need experts. on it. [ crash ] and sometimes the expert the expert needed needs insurance expertise. it's all good. steve, you're covered for general liability. and, paul, we got your back with workers' comp. wow, it's like a party in here. where are the hors d'oeuvres, right? [ clanking ] tartlets? we cover commercial vehicles, too. i think there's something wrong with your sink. they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to and never go to the post office again!
10:24 pm
10:25 pm
10:26 pm
♪ [ camera shutter clicks ] the new galaxy s10 on xfinity mobile. the phone and network designed to do more. get $250 back on a new galaxy and save on the network with millions of wifi hotspots. say "get a galaxy" to learn more. ♪ >> sean: we showed you how democrats want to abolish the electoral college, lower the voting age, and yes, want to stack the u.s. supreme court. 2020 democratic democratic
10:27 pm
candidate kirsten gillibrand wants to give social security to illegal immigrants. take a look. >> we need operative immigration reform. you must have the ability to pay into social security, pay your taxes, to pay into the local school system, and have a pathway to citizenship. a that must happen. >> sean: joining as a reaction from a nationally syndicated radio talk show host, larry elder. fox news contributor, former arkansas governor, mike huckabe mike huckabee. doesn't a sanctuary state or city, governor, aren't they aiding and abetting criminal activity? isn't this a case of rewarding illegal activity, and if we only pay attention to the laws we want, can we have a system of laws? >> sean, you are so outdated. you have to get in the group, man. don't you know if a person comes
10:28 pm
here illegally -- listen, sean. let's not only give them grandma's social security, let's toss in a car and maybe rent for a nice home. i'm just amazed that people are applauding this kind of stuff. i hope kirsten gillibrand has to go out and talk to people in their 70s who can barely afford food and tell them that they are not going to get there social security raise because we are going to be giving it to people who broke into this country. i can'tth wait to see if she can get applause and a room full of retirees living on social security when she makes that ridiculous proposal. >> sean: i love getting beat up on my own trail. thank you, governor, i appreciate that. i'm way behind the times. larry, i want to get your reaction. to me, you're a lawyer, too. this, to me, is fundamental. flaws that are upheld or not. if you don't like the laws, change the laws.
10:29 pm
>> of course that's true. governor, i'm surprised you were so stingy. how about a trust fund? a couple of omaha steaks? they give in-state tuition to illegal aliens, were illegal aliens are able to drive cars, they are able to practice law, get a license to practice law, this is what they are doing. putting the welcome carpet down there to attract more illegal aliens. i assume, and pursuit of the hispanic vote. the real question about whether or not that it's going to work by the average poll on donald trump and hispanic support is about 30%, the same percentage as mitt romney got, the same percentage that john mccain god. i don't think it will work. >> sean: what i don't understand is, compare the obama years, throwing out those statistics, i don't need to do it anymore. look at trump two years, record low unemployment, african-americans, hispanic-americans, asian-americans, women, youth, is there an impact -- to peopleu now make the correlation that
10:30 pm
conservatism, less burdensome regulation, lower taxes, actually works and benefits everybody? >> i think that a lot of people are beginning to realize that and there is a misperception that allot hispanics believe tht illegal immigration is great. that is just not true. most hispanics are law-abiding, hardworking people, and they resent that some people have come here and just complete violation and just ignoring the laws when they have had to work really hard to feed their families and take care of them. i think it's an assumption about hispanics that is simply absolutely untrue. >> sean: larry, i don't know. i have a "hannity" monologue coming up on what this impact of their proposals would be, how much it would cost, and what it would do to the country. i look at this, and i'm like, this has all been tried before. it hasn't worked.
10:31 pm
>> the assumption you're making is that you care whether or not it works. alexandria ocasio-cortez's old bar shut down because new york went to a $15 an hour yet the democrats are still pushing that for everybody. they don't care that it doesn't work. it's good politics. >> sean: guys, good to see you both. you are both on your game. if all their policies were ever implement that in america, how much would it cost and what will america look like? i will explain all that. up next, we have really weird, disturbing reports. beto bozo, bizarre behavior. he literally eight dirt. because of ted cruz. we sent lawrence jones to his home state to see what they really think about him. >> if you could name one accomplishment of beto, what would you say? >> i think is a real people person and he's gotten a lot of people behind him. >> i like his idea about tearing down the wall. >> sean: that's next. the cause of socialism and no one else will tell you.
10:32 pm
straight>> a ahead. ♪ when you rent from national... it's kind of like playing your own version of best ball. because here, you can choose any car in the aisle, even if it's a better car class than the one you reserved. so no matter what, you're guaranteed to have a perfect drive. [laughter] (vo) go national. go like a pro. see what i did there?
10:33 pm
10:34 pm
10:35 pm
jushis local miracle ear t at helped andrew hear more of the joy in her voice. just one hearing test is all it took for him to hear more of her laugh... and lessf the background noise around him. for helen, just one visit to her local miracle-ear is all it took to learn how she can share more moments with her daughter. just one free hearing test could help you hear more... call now for your free hearing test from an industry leader: miracle-ear.
10:36 pm
♪ >> sean: really strange, very bizarre behavior. get this, he loses the ted cruz. what did he do? he literally eight dirt. i mean, literally. you are hearing me right. according to "the washington post," during a trip to new mexico in january, bozo eight dirt because he heard it had regenerative powers, even brought some home for his family to eat. how delicious, how nice. that is not all. the profile goes on to explain how he loves to play pranks. here's a few examples. a remote control cockroach in his kitchen.
10:37 pm
psycho style shower scares in the shower. and one time he took poop from his kids daughter diaper, put s wife's bowl, and said it was avocado. you can make this up. we sent our own investigative reporter and friend of the program lawrence jones to texas. his home state, to find out what people in texas think of former congressman beto o'rourke, and if they can name one accomplishment because nancy pelosi sure couldn't. here's what he told lawrence. >> beto is the candidate that is running for president. what do you feel about him? >> i feel he brings a new perspective to politics. >> his philosophy on how government should be run as a little -- not going to see extreme but kind of bordering on socialism. >> i would vote for him if he ran against donald trump. >> what would you say it is his number one accomplishment? >> i'm not terribly familiar with his congressional record. >> would you won't remember
10:38 pm
president? >> absolutely. >> if you getting one accomplishment of beto, what would you say? >> i think is a real people person and he's gotten a lot of people behind him. >> what would you say was his biggest accomplishment? >> i don't know. i really can't say what his biggest accomplishment was. >> i voted for him last time, probably not for president. i don't think he is ready. >> i like his idea about tearing down the wall. >> if he could name one accomplishment of beto o'rourke, what would you name? >> [laughs] almost bidding ted cruz. >> what would you say it is because accomplishment? >> that part, i don't know. >> what would you say is his number one accomplishment? oh, heck -- can i say that? >> you can say that. >> oh, no. i really don't know. >> he doesn't have one. >> no. >> sean: [laughs] each dirt, and no
10:39 pm
accomplishments. joining us with more as our special correspondent, fox news contributors, lawrence jones, tammy bruce. this is your home state, lawrence. not one accomplishment and he eats dirt and admits that he eats dirt. because dirt has special powers, and he brings it home to his family to eat dirt. >> [laughs] i think what it demonstrated in texas is that a lot of the democrats that are supporting him, it's all personality. none now of them could name and accomplishment. i even interviewed one person who was an oil and gas person. he knows that beto is going to damage his business and he supports him. i just don't get it. that shows you that the democrats have nothing. if you look at the candidates, not just a beto, all of them, their policies are so far to the left, i don't think mainstream americans will be able to get on board. >> sean: reminds me a lot of when obama was running. a lot of lofty rhetoric, great teleprompter reading, excitement by the media, no vetting by the
10:40 pm
media. what were his accomplishments? community organizer, voting present, acorn, reverend wright's church for two decades. not much to run on with substance but nobody in the media cared. people didn't care. >> even in this case, we know that reuters reporter protected him during the senate race, had information that he was part of a hacking collective, and they held that until after the senate race. they had an agreement with him to do so. so we know the same situation will be happening. look at what we've already found out, though, he is a dirt leader. you can imagine if that got out, what we don't know. i would say that some of the media are saying, that is intriguing that he's like obama but i would suggest that democrats, in the end, they did not like what ended up happening, a chance they took, a mistake, and it got us donald trump, which of course is the result of that. >> sean: and willing to give him a pass for stupid stuff he did as a kid. we all do stupid things, even
10:41 pm
into our 20s. but by the time you get to that age, he ate the dirt after he lost to ted cruz. that was recent. >> these are obviously adult behaviors that are odd but keep in mind, when we talk about giving him a pass for what he was doing as a teenager, being in a hacking collective, this is a man who also said that he's open to the idea of 16-year-olds voting. so on one hand, we are not to pass on expectations of people who are under 18, between 15 and 18, because we don't know what they're doing, on the other hand, we are supposed to give them the power to decide who is going to become president of united states. you can't have it both ways. one last point i would make is that this is a fellow who has an easy pass in texas, he's going to be ripped up in the democratic primary season because there are people with experience, and he has none, and
10:42 pm
i think he has some additional problems that will be finding out about. >> he has no policy. this is a guy who admitted to wanting to be molded by the american people. i've never heard of a presidential candidate, or anyone that runs for office, that says, i actually don't know where i stand on these issues, but i want to go to you guys and be molded into something. that is really scary. i think that is what leads us into this path of socialism because, look, we don't live in a democracy. we live in a constitutional republic. he has to govern himself by the majority rule, that's anti-american. >> sean: our framers, as i said, they were very clear in the constitutional convention about why. federal authority -- a lot of these estates, they have no effect on the presidential election, they are not going to be a part of the united states, people have not figured that out. great analysis, great job, both of you. we appreciate it. we'll continue to bet all these candidates, like we didn't '07'o
10:43 pm
seven and '08 when they just had thrills of their legs about then candidate obama. when we come back, very important menu monologue. we i'll expend all the free, free, free giveaways proposed by the democrats. we'll destroy, destroy, destroy this great country, and the villain of the day, straight ahead. ♪ chicken?! chicken. chicken! that's right, candace-- new chicken creations from starkist. buffalo style chicken in a pouch-- bold choice, charlie! just tear, eat... mmmmm. and go! try all of my chicken creations! chicken!
10:44 pm
10:45 pm
10:46 pm
10:47 pm
you ♪ >> sean: return to our "hannity watch" and radical 2020 democrats, and our "hannity" many monologue. i want to explain in detail combo what does free, free, free, everything government mean, why the left continues to push these fantasies, they will take away all your fears and everything will be taken care of from the minute you are born to the minute you die. free health care, college, college care, retirement, vacations, government funded
10:48 pm
guaranteed food and more. no planes, cows, cars, oil, or gas. let me -- he wants to think about this. every single time you were offered something for free,e, in this case, these are promises they can never keep, and you will give up your freedom. you could have more control of your life to a bureaucrat, and you lose the ability to make choices, to do with them the best interest of you and your family. remember how we told you bernie sanders has three homes, seven figure income. why doesn't he share his own money? congresswoman ocasio-cortez loves to take planes instead of the train, the amtrak, despite air travel. abolish her motto should be due as i say coming out as ier do. in addition to everything else, democrats also want a handout, free cash, to every american, no strings attached. gscory booker's hometown of newark, new jersey, they are doing a test, universal basic income program. you have dark roast democratic
10:49 pm
candidate andrew yang grabbing headlines, weighing in on male circumcision. we gavewe each and every americn i thousand dollars a month, how are we going to pay for that? pay corporations, like amazon for take a look. >> big proposing the freedom dividend, every adult in america, starting at age 18, would receive a thousand dollars a month. this would enable millions of americans to more effectively make transitions, as we are in the midst of, right now, the greatest economic and technological transformation and history of our country. we are calling it the fourth industrial revolution. >> sean: i'm sure it seems like a good faith attempt to help poor and working-class deal with challenges, handing out money, no strings attached, is dangerous. first thing it will do isan destroy incentive to work hard, and better your life, when you take 70% of people, 90% of
10:50 pm
corporate income, no one wants to do anything. where is his money coming from? look at what happened in film vineland. they try that t experiment. failed to get anybody back to work. here is what the left doesn't get. higher taxes, 70% for individuals, 90% for corporations, as proposed, burdensome regulation, massive government programs, they will drive every business out of this country, leaving fewer and fewer taxpayers to deal with a bigger and bigger tax bill, because as it turns out, nothing is free,ut everything has a cost. somebody has to pay for it. look at the middle-class exodus from new york. california, new jersey, illinoi illinois. because the 70% top marginal rate, the 90% top corporate rate, it's going to make it impossible. no business can survive. they will all leave. no wonder congresswoman ocasio-cortez owes taxes, o-portedly come under 2012 failed business. guess who's hurt the most by all
10:51 pm
of those? people they purport to help. the poor and the working class, because the truth is, a free enterprise system has led more people out of poverty and created the higher standard of living than any other economic system in history. while we should do everything we can do to help the forgotten men and women in this country, they matter most -- which trump is doing, after obama at the 13 million moreft americans to food stamps, he had that 8 million more americans to property, the of living, among the poor and working-class in america is better than almost any other place on earth because of our capitalist system. look at pew research, even americans who are considered poor are actually middle-class when you look at the global scale, findings by the heritage foundation, the vast majority of americans living in "deep poverty" have air conditioned computer, cell phones." lived paychecke to paycheck. that is not what we want for every citizen. we wantwe every american to have
10:52 pm
better and more life than just the bare necessities. but if you compare poverty in america, places like. venezuela, cuba, all these other countries, they are suffering all across latin america. honduras brady 66% poverty rate. conservatism, capitalism, freedom marks. limited regulations, low taxes, allowed businesses to thrive. that creates jobs opportunities for everyone. jfk did it, regulated, and now we see donald trump doing it. with near record low unemployment, record number of americans, the best wage growth in a decade under donald trump, finally, energy independent for the first time in 70 years, and we are going to have millions of high-paying jobs in the energy industry if the government sdoesn't take it over. they want to roll all that back. hopefully the american people know better than this. they want to fall for the bait and switch. it seems great, everything is
10:53 pm
free. nationalizing the health care and energy industries, tampering with the market, mandating what car you can drive, what you can eat, getting rid of oil, gas, planes, free money, for those unwilling to work for you that will be a disaster. socialism has been a failure every time it has been tried. it has resulted in some of the biggest and largest amount of human suffering and history. so tonight, remember, as we go through the selection process, one thing: surrendering control of everything to the government, and they promise to take all your fears away and guaranty everything is going to be great, how did you keep your doctor, keep your plan, and save money work out? that is only one aspect for the government taking all your hard-earned money, not going to lead to economic prosperity. don't fall for the false promises, the scare tactics, hysteria, playing on your fears. it's all part of their plan, they want to control every
10:54 pm
aspect of your life. they want you more dependent on them so you will keep them in power. what is taking place right now, this is a defining moment in american politics. two radically different agendas and ideas for our future are on display. one of them, racking up success after success after success. it's time for america to stay the course. the trump agenda is setting records where it's most important. helping people with a ladder afterlp success, helping businesses invest and build factories and manufacturing centers and create jobs and places like pennsylvania, wisconsin, ohio, michigan. radical 2020 democrats, they are on a mission. they will roll it all back and america will become unrecognizable. you won't believe what happened, for example, to a i.c.e. agent while detaining an illegal immigrant. we'll get to that next. our morning of the day: socialism will lead to an america youis won't recognize.
10:55 pm
it won't be the same america for your kids and grandkids. our "well another day ," your mail, next ♪ doug, doug!
10:56 pm
10:57 pm
douglas! we're running dangerously low on beans. people love your beans, doug. they love 'em. doooooooooug! you want to go sell some tacos? progressive knows small business makes big demands. doug, where do we get a replacement chili pepper bulb? so we'll design the insurance solution that fits your business. it's a very niche bulb. it's a specialty bulb. we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers.
10:58 pm
go to and get 2 months free.
10:59 pm
>> sean: tonight's "villain of the day" earned the title in a particularly gruesome way. the illegal immigrant christopher santos was released because of new york cityr sanctuary city policies. here is the story, he overstayed his visa in 2015, racked up a criminal record, charges of driving while intoxicated and assault. i.c.e. put a detainer on him after an assault charge in september. the nypd never handed them over to the feds because of new york's sanctuary city status. i.c.e. couldn't go after him on his own, and earlier this month he bit off a piece of a i.c.e. agent's finger. pretty disgusting. we can stop things like that. time for a viewer mail. one writes "most of the dems who support the green new deal have
11:00 pm
a reddit." another writing "they think they own the government and american citizens are there subjects." we will always be fair and balanced, not the destroy-trump hedia mob. laura ingraham in washington how are you? >> laura: if i spoke ukrainian, maybe i would volunteer to be the new ambassador. >> sean: wait, i missed that? >> laura: if i spoke ukrainian, it looks like they're looking for a new ambassador. >> sean: we have a tape, too real collusion. >> laura: bill barr has a lot to think about it, doesn't he? >> sean: i he does his job. >> laura: i think he will do a great job. hannity, awesome show. >> sean: laura, you have a great show. >> laura: i'm lauren graham and mrs. "the ingraham angle" from another busy washington tonight. as joe biden looks more and more likely to jump into the 2020 field, i'll explain why global


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on