tv Meet the Press NBC June 17, 2018 8:00am-8:58am PDT
this sunday, truth and consequences. presidt trump makes many false claims about e justice department and inspector general's report. >> the report yesterday may be more important than than anything it totally exonerates me. >> no, it doesn't. the fbi. you look at what happened, they were plotting against my election. >> no, they weren't. and about separating the children at the boarder. >> that's the democrat's bill that's the democrats wanting to othat. >> no it isn't. how can we believe a president who routinely says things that are provably false?
my guests kellyanne conway and adam schiff. plus, what is happening to the children separated from fair parents? >> this place is called a shelter but the kids are in fact incarcerated. >> whoever wins the immigration battle the children are the losers. and the new endangered species -- republicans who criticize the president. my conversation with trump critic congressman mark sanford. just lost his republican primary race. joining me for insight and analysis are, nbc news national political reporter carol lee. "new york times" pentagon correspondent he lean cooper. republican strategist al cardenas. and "new york times" columnist brett stevens. welcome to sunday, it's "meet the press." >> from nbc news in washington, the longest running show in television history, this is "meet the press" with chuck todd. >> good sunday morning. happy father's day. what kind of week has it been
for president trump? to president trump's critics the north korea summit was a self-serving spectacle that achieved lit and to the president it moved the world away from nuclear war. to the critics the gh, 7 summit was an unnecessary insult to our closest alleieallies. to the president, it was a triumph of american strength. mr. trump megyn kellying it clear the u.s. will no longer play the role of sucker to greedy allies to the critics the inspector general's report vindicated hillary clinton that her campaign was the campaign of james comey's decisions. to president trump the report fully exonerated him from charges of obstruction of justice and collusn. finally to the ess critics, the jailing of his former campaign manager paul manafort was more evidence of the conspiracy and collusion with russia and to president trump it was a tough sentence. what about comey and crooked hillary? very unfair, he tweets. well, some of the president's
assertions this week are debatable, others are flatout false. first of all the ig report did not exonerate it. the focus was on the hillary clinton e-mail investigation and not the mueller probe and though despite president trump's claims it's not a democratic bill that's separating the families at the borr it's trump administration policy enacted by the attorney general. still the president spent the week feeling and acting emboldened, highlighted facts where they were helpful and making them up where they weren't. >> paul manafort worked for he for a short amount of time. >> president trump served up shorthoods before his former campaign manager was sent to jail. he was ordered to behind the bars. ahead of his trial on federal conspiracy and money laundering charges set for late this summer. >> he worked for me for 49 days or something. very short period of time. >> that's not true. ump's presidential campaign
for 144 days. including during the crucial republican convention. the president also defended former national security adviser michael flynn. >> some people say he lied and some people say he didn't lie. i mean, really it turned out maybe he didn't lie. >> in fact, flynn has already t fbi and trump tweeted back in december i had to fire general flynn because he lied to the vice president and the fbi. on misleading statement he dictated last year about a trump tower meeting with russians during the 2016 campaign, which his lawyer at first denied on "meet the press," then his legal team admitted to -- >> let's not talk about it. you know what that is? it's irrelevant. it's a statement to "the new york times." not a statement to the high tribunal of judges. >> that's the president admitting he misled "the new york times." emboldened after the meeting this week with north korea dictator kim jong-un, mr. trump returned to the united states eager to go on offense against his political opponents.
and hinted there will be rewards down the road for his allies if they stay loyal. the president's attorney rudy giuliani said on friday that the mueller investigation might get cleaned up with some presidential pardons. before pulling back. >> he's not going to pardon anybody. in this investigation. but he's not obviously going to give up his right to pardon if there's a miscarriage of justice. >> lately he's facing little pushback from his own party. >> it's become cultish. >> some may be done defending mueller if the president acts against him. >> what i think about the mueller investigation they ought to wrap it up. it's gone on seemingly forever. >> mr. trump is relishing the lack of congressional and political guardrails also making false statements about separating migrant children from their parents. which over a six week period separated nearly 2,000 children. >> i hate the children being
taken away. the democrats have to change their law. that's their law. >> sir -- >> quiet. >> and joining me now is kellyanne conway counselor to president trump. welcome t th t press." >> thank you, chuck. >> i want to start with something that senator graham said on friday on cnn. take a listen. >> president trump could stop this policy with the phone call. >> he doesn't seem to acknowledge that. >> wel he can't. now go tell him. if you don't like families being parated you can tell dhs stop doing it. >> is the president ready to make that phone call to the attorney general to dhs, to stop this policy? >> the president is ready to get meaningful immigration reform across the board and chuck, let me just tell you that nobody likes eing babies ripped from their mother's arms, from their mother's wombs frankly, but we have to make sure that dhs is -- the laws are understood through the sound bite culture we live in. there are three circumstances by which dhs evaluates a child at
the border. one is does this child actually have a custodial or familial relationship with the adult? number two, is the child in danger and plenty have been over time. some adults are using children to gain access to the border. number three is the adult subject to criminal prosecution? this is a vexing problem that both presidents bush and president obama faced as well. secretary of dhs under president obama told "the new york times" this weekend that this was the bane of his existence for three years. he was describing the fact that they had to detain families in these large facilities for a very long period of time. why? because in the summer of 2014, we saw this surge particularly from central america. tens of thousands if not more e border and trying to gain entry. i have a teenage daughter, you have a dean age daughter. can we say with a straight face that we know all -- what leaning reporters from ir?
huff po did a segment about the girls faced certain rape trying to make that journey northward. many of them are getting vaccinated or getting shots for birth control because it was almost certain. this is a perilous journey for many of the children and if people cared, we would figure out way to get the funding to expand the centers and to close the loopholes. these loopholes are allowing open border policies. i think what the president is saying if the democrats are serious they'll come together again and try to close these loopholes and get real immigration reform. >> so it sounds like -- this is going to sound harsh but sounds like you're holding the kids hostage to get the democrats to the table to pass some law. >> no. >> you disjust laid out a very compassionate case for understa a very compassion -- with a lot of compassion, a lot of empathy in there. but it's not very empathetic the most traumatic thing to do to the kid separate them from their parents once they made that
journey. why do that right now? i understand we have an immigration debate going on in this country. why use these kids as leverage? >> well, i certainly don't want anybody to use these kids as leverage. i saw a headline that breathlessly screamed as much and i objected to that forcefully. let me say this. these children are -- >> in fairness by the way it was a white house official who told the "wall street journal" -- the thinking is to force people to the table. >> by the way i want that person to say it to my face, i really do. i'll meet them at t white house because i think that's a disgrace. >> should that person be fire liquiditied? >> that person should have the guts to come forward and put their name to that quote. how's thatter? number two, and most importantly, these children are handed over to hhs. why? because 's human services so they can be put into the facilities like al cajon where there was a report that there were boys aged 6 to 17 who were all there. they have the necessary medications. obviously, food and shelter. they have exercise. they have education during the day. >> i don't -- nobody is doubting
that they're getting reasonable care there. the question is, the most dramatic thing to do is taking them away in first place. you don't have to. >> chuck -- >> you don'te to be doing that. >> in orders if i commit a crime and i'm put in jail, my four children are separated from their mother. because we don't have a policy or why would you want the ildren in jail with their parents? you want them in the facility temporarily or you want them to be repatriated back to the home country with said parent or come in with a responsible adult who you know, who the authorities are confident means that child no harm, won't get them into the gang. won't subject them to trafficking or rape or worse. you want them to go with a family member or another close family friend who would be a custodian. so this has been a vexing problem for many years. i would tell everybody, this week when the president goes to congress at 5:30 on tuesday, get together, chuck, i don't
remember a single democrat debut -- i could be mistaken, where the republicans and the democrats were invited to the cabinet room. i believe that your cable station covered it live. >> sure. >> for one hour, did this issue come up? the democrats only want to talk about daca the, dreamers. >> but in fairness kids weren't become separated from their parents then. this policy got implemented in april. a zero tolerance policy where every migrant, asylum seekers are treated as a criminal. >> it's adjudicated, and what they should have said is look, we had a surge over the border in 2014. mr. presiden under president obama, it shocked everyone and we simply didn't have the capacity. we want to avoid that in the future and work with. look, the democrats just own it. why don't they say, we're for open borders.
if you extrapolate the money spent on every unaccompanied minor, we have 18 million in households that make less than $35,000. >> but as you know, this is a question of morality. a question of -- >> you have heard me weigh in on that. >> i did. >> as a mother, as catholic, as somebody who has got a conscience and wouldn't say the junk that somebody said. apparently, allegedly. i will tell you that nobody likes this policy. you saw the president on camera, he wants this to end. but everybody has -- >> he can end it on his own. >> chuck, congress padded -- passed a law that it's a crime. this is a crime to enter this country illegally. so if they don't like thataw they should change it. >> you can keep the families together. ayy to still potentially -- >> -- as opposed to -- >> why don't you createntn cent? >> we had those under president obama but the democrats are holding up the funding to expand
them. the president had a 70 point immigration plan this was included in it. doubling the detention center capacity, hiring more i.c.e. agents. we don't have the capacity. those brave men and women at the border trying to do their jobs as best they can, this is an issue. and if the democrats are serious and if a lot of republicans are serious they'll come together. they won't talk about this week the dreamers or just the wall. or just catch and release. it's all of the above. there are ways to repatriate these families back to their home countries expeditiously. i want to make clear because thank you for saying nobody is arguing the kids aren't getting care. a lot of folks are proending the killeds are not getting. a lot of people a on your network are saying it's analogous to the concentration camps. >> i want to move on to tariffs. there's a headline in "the des moines register" that shows the impact this is having on the farm ing it at the 624
million hit on soybean sails alone. perhaps for iowa. we're in the full fledged trade war now with china, canada, the european union, mexico which may not be as helpful to us in this border problem because we're beating them up with tariffs. is the president going to follow through with the tariffs? >> respectfully, the president's position is we lost the trade war a long ago and you know who lost it? the american worker lost it. you have over 300,000 new construction jobs, 300,000 new manufacturing jobs, more jobs created in timber and mining. these were industries that were flat on their back in years past and never had seen the growth in the job security you see under this president. this president has exempted certn countries, industries. he's given a pause for a month, then another month. but he thinks that we have been on the losing end of this so-called trade war for years. we have a $400 billion deficit with china. >> you're creating your own
political problem in the midwest. >> i didn't say that. these farmers are very -- many of them are very supportive of president trump because they like his policies when it comes to the tax cuts and deregulation and the fact that poultry and dairy for first time in is a years. every time the president is told you can't do that it will never happen, what a mistake you'll be making, pulling out of the paris accords, going over to singapore and trying to get denuclearization of the korean peninsula. really keeping the promise of five presidents to move the capital -- excuse me, recognize jerusalem as the capital of israel and move our u.s. embassy there he keeps the promises and people say don't do it, it will be a disaster. this will play out over time. but he's tired of the american workers getting screwed. >> president trump on friday said the real fbi, guys love m what does that mean? what's the real fbi? >> the rank and file -- itso di you see the comments being made in text messages.epteer 9th, th
that hillary clinton would go on to refer to president trump's supporters as irredeemable and deplorable, the same day an fbi agent according to the ig report referred to trump's supporters in iowa -- excuse me, ohio as retarded. are we comfortable with that? who is that person? does that person still work at the fbi? are they still getting government resources? do they have his top secret -- >> are you comfortable with the fact that the new york fbi staff was leaking stuff to devin nunes against hillary clinton? what is going on if -- i understand you guys want to make an issue of that. that new york fbi office looks like it's leaking like a sieve. >> apparently in exchange for some leaks that fbi officials were taking gifts from journalists. and you should be very concerned too. i'm sure you are. that people are being offered meals and tickets to games and things of real value. what were they getting in exchange? a new friend? or someone who would be a source
for them? it's very disconcerting. there are many concerting things pl the report. are running around cherry picking it according to their own political point of view. what i would recommend, chuck, is that everybody take the time to really digest 568 pages. although people say that oh, the actions weren't biased. the people certainly were biased at the tippy top. james comey got a hero's welcome for a silly book about leadership, morality and you have the ig report coming to the same conclusion, he was insub ordinary not and outside the chain of command. >> if the president had never uttered the word russia to lester holt, then he would have -- he would have been on higher ground. >> happy father's day. >> thank you so much. same to george. when the justice department's ig report was released on thursday, here was the reaction of the head of the fbi, christopher wray. >> this report did not find any
evidence of political bias or oy impacting the investigation under review. even disregard for policy and decisions that at the very least with the benefit of hindsight were not the best choices. >> joining me is the chief democrat on the house intelligence committee, adam schiff. >> thank you. >> we sort of ended there with kellyanne conway. the report did include that text message exchange between two romantically involved fbi employees, peter strzok and lisa page. august 8, 2016, trump is not ever going to become president, right, right? strzok said no, we'll stop it. if the were shoe on the other foot can you imagine what democrats would be saying? if they had text messages from new york fbi agents, right, that said, we're stopping her. >> yes, i certainly can and in fact the report spells out that loretta lynch and james comey
talked about the virulent anti-clinton bias which is a concern to democrats. we would take solace in the fac making at the bureau. with respect to the new york office we don't know that's the case. presumably -- >> didn't kelly ann say the case, we don't know if that's the case with peter strzok? >> there's an ongoing investigation on to whether the new york field office was leaking to rudy giuliani or the chairman of our committee. that's ongoing. so we don't know the answer yet about whether that ultimately affected the revelation on anthony weiner's laptop e-mails. >> i want to bn nunes, something amazing he admitted to earlier this week. take a listen. >> we had whistle-blowers that came to us in late september of 2016 who talked to us about this laptop sitting up in new york that had additional e-mails on it. >> so good it?
>> for what it's worth, september 26 of 2016 is when this laptop was discovered. so it doesn't i don't think meet the definition of whistle blowing. he said we in the intelligence committee. were you informed of this whistle blowing? >> no, this is the first we have heard about it and it's deeply disturbing because if this was shared by new york field agents with devin nunes, was it also shared with rudy giuliani? or did devin nunes do something which we have seen subsequently which is coordinate with the trump team. was this information share z by the committee with rudy giuliani or shared directly with him? we don't know the answer. but we hope the inspector general will find out. >> do you think peter strzok should be with the fbi at this point? >> i don't know. i imagine that the office of professional responsibility will have to make that decision. certainly the text messages are troubling. the fact they were on work
e-mail, the fact that they were comingled with e-mails discussing business, all tconcl nonetheless, that was completely inappropriate. >> the midterm elections are coming up. there's an idea there should be pauses when you have high profile investigations is there a point that mueller should publicly pause, continuing the investigation, but not -- you know, is there a window where he shouldn't issue the report until after the election? >> i think that he's very conscious of not making the same mistake that comey made by having a decision or a public disclosure made close to the election. so i have to think within a suitable period of time before november -- >> august 1? >> i don't know if it's 30 days, 90 days or more. >> it's not october. >> not october. absolutely not october. i think we're likely to see another indictment before that window. the hacking and dumping operation wasn't charged in the last indictment. the only reason to exclude that when it was part of that same overall conspiracy is if that part of the indictment either
involves u.s. personsr you haven't finished to include the persons. >> there's a compromise piece of immigration legislation, paul ryan, that would include more protection for daca folks. not clear if it will have support on the right because they call it amnesty. can you support this especially if the kids are not separated from the asylum seekers? >> i think what the administration is doing is tears, the pain of these kids as mortar to build their wall. and it's an effort to extort a bill to their liking in the congress. it's -- i think deeply unethical. and by the president's making these provable falsehoods about what's required the party adopting that has become the -- the gop has become the party of lies.
and it's such i think a sad -- >> painting the entire republican party wi that? >> i'm saying that republican members of congress -- republican members of congress who will not call out the president for demonstrable falsehoods on a daily basis and often trump at them -- >> mark sanford did. he'll be on here later. he did and he lost. >> well, this is the problem. because the gop in congress has been -- has become craven enough they'll do anything to maintain the majority, even be complicit with a president who ignores and tears down the rule of law. who repeats falsehood after falsehood. they cannot maintain their integrity as a party if they follow this president. >> all right. do you have a better solution on how to deal with this migrant crisis from central america? it's now a four-year crisis? >> first of all, i think we end this policy of separating kids from their parents. and then i think, you know, we
have to work with these countries to figure out what we can do to stem the violence back home. what we can do to humanely deal with people who are fleeing because they have no option but to flee. we need to be working with our southern neighbor, mexico, to deal with this crisis. none of this can be resolved by angry tweets or by using these families as a leverage. look, you're absolutely right, it's going to be very difficult to get a comprehensive immigration bill in election year, any year. let's not tear the families apart in the meantime. >> shouldn't be part of the immigration -- separating them? >> it shouldn't be. it's just plain wrong and immoral. >> adam schiff, i have to leave it there. ranking democrat on the intelligence committee. democrat from california. thank you. when we come back, it's never comfortable to call the president of the united states a liar. but what do you say when the but what do you say when the president says their experience is coveted. but what do you say when the president says their leadership is instinctive.
they're experts in things you haven't heard of. researchers of technologies that one day you will. best of the best. calthem veter. we call them our team. at&t provides edge-to-edge intelligence, covering virtually every part of your manufacturing business. & so this won't happen. because you've made sure this sensor and this machine are integrated.
& she can talk to him, & yes... atta, boy. some people assign genders to machines. and you can be sure you won't have any problems. except for the daily theft of your danish. not cool! at&t provides edge to edge intelligence. it can do so much for your business, the list goes on and on. that's the power of &. & this shipment will be delivered... back now with the panel.
"new york times" columnist bret stephens. nbc news political recorder carol lee and helene cooper. rich card amass. all right. let me put together this list of just outright misstatements or lies. >> well, no, there's no trade war. i think that the report yesterday may be more importantly than than anything it totally exonerates me. some people say he lied, maybe he didn't lie. h nothing to do our campaign. the democrats have to change their law. tir law. president obama lost crimea, just so you understand. >> every single one of those things is absolutely not true. the crimea one being the most ridiculous. there's no democratic bill, manafort for three months -- more than almost six months of the campaign. the president himself said michael flynn lied, that's why
he fired him. the ig report was of course not about that. it's -- what do you do? >> you have to be a tax on mist of falses. he has been trafficking in a substance that's identical to my initials. >> your name again is bret stephens. >> right. >> i wanted to clarify. >> i mean, this is a world sort of -- the gray world between clear truths and unmistakable lies. and there's always a question also about the president's state of mind because he says stuff and then often doesn't seem to remember what he had said the day, the hour, the minute before. i still think that you have to horadicting information has pre >> it's funny you say this about the mental capacity.
andrew sullivan went there. if someone behaved like this, if someone kept initialing that the sea was red and the sky was green i would assume they were a few sandwiches short of a picnic. it's vital to remember this every day, almost no one else in public life is no openly living in his own world. >> what do you want me to do? that's like -- it's something that at the "the times" we have been wrestling with because we get a lot of letters from readers why don't you call a lie a lie, and we have said lied in the past. but the shouldn't use it all the time because it loses the meaning. i can't remember wrestle with -- if you keep saying he's right to a certain extent if you keep saying lie, lie, lie, it loses the impact when it's a whopper. it's something i don't have to
deal with when it's the president. >> that's the thing. all politicians tell lies. we have experienced this in covering -- >> but there used mob honor among thieves. >> this is a different level. what we struggle with as reporters, it's deliberate. so with president trump you know in order to call it a lie, you have to be able to show that he is deliberately and intentionally doing that. a lot of times when he'sll i informed, misinformed you don't know what his intent is. that adds a whole other dimension we are not used to. but his false statements -- there's nothing to compare it with. the number of times. >> after watching what you just played out here, the only -- you only reach one of two conclusions. does he have mental capability issues or he is chronically doing this and if he's doing it chronically is it purposeful? or, you know, just a matter of habit or addiction? and -- >> it does sound like he's selling a time share all the
time. >> here's the point. the point politically it's less damaging for him to lie 18 times in one morning than once. because that feature that helps him the most is the numbness. because of the frequency and volume of these things. the numbness with the electorate. they have so much to absorb and so little time to do it that they go home half of the time confused rather than convinced that something is amiss here. >> what a great point. you know, barack obama got the quote lie of the year, if you like your health care plan, you get to keep it. that was back in 2012 or '13. but you're right. he didn't serially do it. here he's punished for one -- the numbness. >> the lies sort of disappear in their own ubiquity. but it's important >> right out of the putin playbook. >> right, it's important to pick our spots. i remember senator mccain said i can't be the car alarm that's always going off. and i think we also have to be careful about -- for our own
credibility about being very scrupulous of separating what are clear lies or seem to be clear lies from misstatements, falsehoods. otherwise, it gives him the opening to call us the fake news media which is what he wants. >> it's possible one of the reasons he did that crazy press scrum on friday is that it's been a bad week legally for the president. this is all the developments this week. michael cohen splitting with his legal team. is he going to flip? paul manafort now in jail. is he counselrom the mueller of new york is suing the trump foundation and perhaps referring a criminal complaint to the irs. this was not a good week legally. >> no, not at all. you see him latch on to this ig report to argue that he's been vindicated and that, you know, there's bias at the fbi and that all of his -- the whole public
campaign that he's been waging against the mueller investigation is valid and that he's ramping that up and so not only did he do that scrum on the white house lawn, which by the way, i have never seen a president do. but he also is latching on to that and preparing to really double down on their pushback and effort to undermine the mueller sgletion what you left out from that he had an interview friday morn on the white house lawn with "fox & friends" and he heaped this praise on kim jong-un and he likes the way that he makes his people sit up at attention with him and he wishes he could do the same with his people. later on he said he was kidding but it's such an extraordinary -- at a time where we have had a year and a half of extraordinary president trump performances, i think friday should be up there. >> here's the thing that is an indicator that's troubling.
there's been a lot of talk ab what flynn may have done, what manafort may have done. some people tell me, well, those are selfish actions and those were horrible, and they're paying a legal price for it. but what's that got to do with president trump other than to say that he surrounds himself with people of questionable judgment and moral ilk. but when we had last week or the week before that admonition by the president himself that he wrote this script for "the new york times" for his son donald trump jr. and three times before they lied about it, i say to myself, you know, there's more involvement here than meets the eye because with all the staff that he has for him personally to do this with his son, he had to have a briefing of what occurred in order to write the thing. now we know of his involvement and in a concrete way that we didn't know before. >> what was amazing he almost admitted that yes, look, i lied to "the new york times," but so
what? you guys are no high tribunal. >> saying it to the new york times. >> no high tribunal -- apparently it's not illegal to lie to the american people either. when we come back, my interview with republican congressman sanford who lost his primary largely because he was willing to criticize president trump's personal conduct. and he hasn't stopped criticizing him. six in the morning. she thought it was a fire. it was worse. a sinkhole opened up under our museum. eight priceless corvettes had plunged into it. hou. we had everyone we needed to get our museum back up and running, and we opened the next day. captured lightning in a bottle. over 260 years later as the nation's leader in energy storage
we're ensuring americans have the energy they need, whenever they need it nextera energy. ♪ south l.a. is very medically underserved. when the old hospital closed people in the community lived with untreated health problems for years. so, with the county's help we built a new hospital from the ground up and having citi as an early investor worked as a signal to others to invest. with citi's help we built a wonderful maternity ward and we were able to purchase an mri machine. we've made it possiblr to lead healthier lives and that's invaluable. ♪
it can detect a threat using ai, and respond 60 times faster. it lets you know where your data lives, down to the very server. it keeps your insights from prying eyes, so they're used by no one else but you. it is... the cloud. the ibm cloud. the cloud that's built for all your apps. secure to the core. the ibm cloud is the cloud for smarter business. secure to the core. i think, keep going, and make a difference. at some point, we are going to be able to beat als. because life is amazing. so i am hoping for a cure. i want this, to uh, to be a reality. um, yeah.
welcome back. congressman mark sanford of south carolina has been tough on fellow republicans who criticized president trump in private but are silent in public. if you want to know " b he's soon or the former congressman sanford. he has criticized president trump in public and on tuesday, mr. trump tweeted the following, mark sanford has been very aign congressman on friday. i began by asking him if he blames president trump for his defeat. >> plenty of blame to go around, but if you boil it down i
wouldn't -- i wasn't trump enough in the age of trump. yeah, so in that regard, he certainly had a hand in it. >> you knew this for a while though. you saw this upfront. when did it dawn on you, boy, this is a tide you won't be able to defeat? >> my boys have been saying this for a while. you begin to feel certain things, but at the end of the day in this process you have to be you. so i had spoken out as i had with regard to the president. d it cost me. so the commercials by the opponents were a greatest hits of what i said about the president over the last year and half. if you look from the policy standpoint i was supportive. this is not about policy, but it was about personal loyalty. let me play what your colleagues said to your loss. >> when you're in primary season, again, it's usually a good thing not to be at odds official in your party. elected >> if you're not on the same
page as the president, in 85, 95% of your base is that can cause a problem. >> you have to be critical and add value and, you know, my view is that i guess people didn't see the value. >> i know how close you and lindsey graham are. i think he's the god father to one of your sons. i have noticed he's changed his style of late. it's -- you didn't. what did you make of that reaction? >> getting bad newsropresident. they'll say what they want to say. the number of people who will say privately to you, this sz a tribal as i have ever seen it in my life, but in public will say the things you saw on air. it's remarkable. that's been the case since the ec the president. based on stands i held for 20 ye ofylife >> what's conservative -- do you think donald trump -- is the definition of conservative changed inside the republican
party? >> i think we have to do a whole lot of sole searching as a party. it was a narrow victory back home. it was 3,000 votes one way or another. >> 00 votes for a runoff. >> correct. but what was interesting is the number of people who said, look, i want something between -- halfway crazy and socialist. what's happened to our party? i hear that over and over again. >>t's yo explanation? >> well, legitimately, the trump phenomenon was caused by people who wanted to see ackwledged bu morphed or metastasized into something that is quite different about this larger loyalty to the president himself. and so have i been loyal to -- you know, the conservative cause, yeah, i have every merit badge on the front. >> bob corker said this. it's becoming a cultish thing. isn't it? it's not a good place for any party to end one a cult-like situation as it relates to the president that happens to be purportedly of the same party. would you use that word?
as cult. but i would just say that from an electoral sense people are running for cover because they don't want to be on the losing side of the presidential tweet. from a populist standpoint it's almost a philistine bargain, i'll pander to you if you band tore me and that exchange is very -- it's dangerous really with regard to the -- again, to what the founding father set up which is a system designed to garner debate and dissent. the idea that you can't speak out and say, i disagree with you here, but i agree with you on 90% of the stuff is again a twilight world i have never seen. >> what about this issue that literally the president can say whatever he ts,wanfree, mischaracterize the friday morning spectacle was something to behold. you -- like i said, you been troubled by issues with the truth. you have been troubled by some of the things he's done with law enforcement. but speaking out cost you your
political career. jeff flake, cost his political career. these -- you guys are very like minded libertarian leaning conservatives. what does say that? >> well, we have gone from is george washington, i can't tell a lie back down at the apple tree, to so replete and nobody questions him anymore. that's a dangerous spot to be in a reason based republic. i have a unique vantage point on this front. we all know the story of 2009 and my implosion. >> yes. >> a lie was told on my behalf which means i own it. more to the point i was living a lie in that chapter of lies but there were incredible consequences. financially, politically, socially, i lost -- i can go down a long is list. >> you paid a price. >> right. so maybe the reason i'm so outspoken on this now is there is no seeming consequence to the president and lies.
and if we accept that as a society, it is going to have incredibly harmful consequences in the way that we operate going forward, based on the construct of the founding fathers. >> why is it just you and jeff flake and bob corker? where's speaker ryan? where's the head of the legislative branch? >> people are running for the hills. again, everybody -- what you do as an elected official is an all-time -- old time senator said the name of the game is to stay out of the game. >> so you compartmentalize? >> you compartmentalize. i saw a thing with kevin mccarthy talking about how the president was a genius with regard to trade and you're going oh, my goodness. tariffs are taxes. and yet, somehow we're going to rationalize at a republican party leadership level what tid regard to, you know, using section 232, go down the list is somehow okay with what the republican party has historically stood for with regard to engagement or trade?
i mean, i could come up with a long list of things that people rationalized but they do it because they want to stay in the game. >> you want to take the issues national in 2020 and debate the president about the direction of the party? >> no, i'm just trying to sort out the last 48 hours of my life. if you have -- i never lost an election before. so this is new territory. but there's some real soul searching that goes with it. i have had a couple of differen voters don't like either >> when we come back, a lot of political party, but once there was an organism so small no one thought much of it at all. people said it just made a mess until exxonmobil scientists put it to the test. they thought someday it could become fuel and power our cars wouldn't that be cool? and that's why exxonmobil scientists think it's not small at all. energy lives here.
so what advice would you give to people just starting out? i would say, do not wait for a perfect moment. you have so many tools at your fingertips, just go for it. my dad had to close the doors of the family bakery, and... ...i wanted to rebuild that business. but in order to make this thing last, i had to learn about some of the things my dad didn't have. our kids bought us a quilt machine, and asked me if i want to do tutorials ands, i took a class that taught me the basics of how to get the business online. that was were i started reimagining myself... i'm an entrepreneur, i can do this. whether you're a teacher... ...a business owner......e the next step inr career, you can find free tools and training to grow your skills at google.com/grow. ♪
money managers are pretty much the same. all but while some push high commission investment products, fisher investments avoids them. some advisers have hidden and layered fees. happy to earn commissions doese from you whether you do well or not, fisher investments fees are structured fisher investments. so we do better when you do better.othem. clearly better money management. captured lightning in a bottle. over 260 years later as the nation's leader in energy storage we're ensuring americans havehe energy they need, whenever they need it nextera energy.
welcome back. data download time. a g change in negatively about both political par tirs and it could have a big impact in republicans gained 63 now younger, less white and more likely to call themselves political moderates or liberal. the result -- in 2010 voters that were dissatisfied with both parties favored the republicans by 26 points. now, these dissatisfied voters favor democrats by 40 points
more. among those voters who don't like either party. keep in mind, these are the throw the bums out voters. they rarely vote for the party in power. when we come back, end game and what to do about those kids separated from their parents at the border. coming up, end game, brought polk county is one of the counties that you don't think about very much. it's really not very important.
i was in the stone ages as much as technology wise. and i would say i had nothing. you become a school teacher for one reason, you love kids. and so you don't have the same tools, you don't always believe you have the same... outcomes achievable for yourself. when we got the tablets, it changed everything. by giving them that technology and then marrying it with a curriculum that's designed to have technology at the heart of it, we are really changing the way that students learn. and i can't wait for ten years from now when i get to talk to them again and see, like, who they are. ♪
♪ music plays throughout) right now, comcast business is doubling your internet speed. so you can download large files faster. and power more employees on more devices. all for a new low price. what does that equal? our best internet price ever. byou can get 150 mbps internet. plus for a limited time, you le. get the best price on fast, reliable speed. call today.
"end game" brought to by boeing. continuing our mission to connect, protect, inspire and explore. back now and the kids at the border. let me play for you guys the attorney general on hugh hulett's radio show explag the policy they have instituted. >> every time somebody gets prosecuted in america for a crime, american citizens, and they go to jail they're separated from their children. we don't want to do this at all. if people don't want to be separated from their children, they should not bring them with them. >> al? >> yep. separation anxiety. i'm a refugee, i came to america. i experienced it. the pain, the heart break of a child about that experience will never go away in their lifetime. and to justify that by saying
that -- to have a clean bed and food is -- it's such on with the parents. i will debunk two myths or lies from the whiou number one, things are not the same as before in twore. number one, office of refugee resettlement. before this white house changed the rules, they would be the ones that would then take the children, they would interview the children -- mostly had relatives here, mostly undocumented and they would turn the children over the relatives. the president of the united states changed it and gave i.c.e. the jurisdiction that the office of resettlement for decades has had. so what does i.c.e. do? you come to interview to take the child they deport you and the child remains alone so relatives are not claiming the children.
all of that is because of this policy. the second policy that's really all here, the president has total authority to deal with the separation of children. so all of those fell lay shouse. in the meantime, we have had 2,000 children sent spraited in a few weeks. that's wrong. this thing needs to get fixed. i don't care -- you know, just listening to kellyanne, when it comes to human tragedy, call a time-out for a week and get something done. >> helene, do you think that anonymous white house staffer will get -- be as harshly treated privately as she promised publicly? >> of course not. it was a hard interview you just conducted with kellyanne conway because she's -- it was just one talking point after another. of course, my heart bleeds for these children being torn, you know, from their parents. i'm a mother, but at the end of the day, this is what the
administration has chosen to do. what jeff sessions said to hugh hewitt was preposterous as well. he is saying that comparing it to a criminal matter which means he is saying that it is -- they're treating it as if it's a n the united states.itic at ridiculous c >> look, it's a master class in cynicism which is in turn born of a philosophy that streets people coming to this country as criminals and as liabilities. you heard it in the president's comments about people from you heard it in previous jeff sessions' comments about why do we need these people who are -- >> john kelly said they struggled to assimilate. >> there are two refugees at this table, i'm a son of a refugee and we're living the american dream and we're evidence that an immigration-based culture is also a success culture. you generally actually judge the success of societies by how many
people want to come to them. not how many people wantrked ha other countries to make sure that the refugee crisis stays outside of the borders, with some success. some failures. we could do that with their -- there are options other than a cruel and unusual punishment, recalling almost -- almost recalling i should say japanese internment. >> carol, last point. >> well, this is a problem that the president created easily as you pointed out in the interview with kellyanne, he could undo, but kicked it over to congress. you see the evangelical republicans say this is not a good policy and put pressure on the white house, yet, you know, the presenryg e it both ways where he's playing to his base and saying this isn't my fault. >> sadly, i have to end the conversation there. you guys can keep it going. before i go, i want to annnce the return of the "meet the press" film festival for its the second annual film festival. it will take place this october
rt by barracuda networks, cloud-connected securityd in and storage solutions that simplify it. scott mcgrew: this week, we delve into car technology. what safety device makes your car the most valuable on trade-in? we'll ask the guy who literally writes the "kelley blue book." plus, christy wyatt tries to find some good in all that data that corporations collect. all that, and venture capitalist hemant taneja, with reporters laura mandaro of "usa today," and joe menn from "reuters," this week on "press:here."