tv The Last Word MSNBC December 17, 2013 7:00pm-8:01pm PST
that has never seen credible and the director of the agency says it's not true. it seems we are likely to learn definitively if the traffic study line is true. and if it's proven to not be true, what happens to chris christie then? that does it for us tonight. now it's time for the last word with lawrence o'donnell. thanks for being with us. the senate has figured out how to go home for christmas this year. just pass a budget and go. >> christmas is one week from wednesday. we have a lot to do. >> the two-year murray/ryan budget deal. >> voting to end debate. >> 67-33.
>> people around here are in too big of a hurry. >> the budget deal under consideration has lost support. >> this bipartisan bill takes the first steps. >> they've got to be able to do other things. >> when we come back next year, i'm ready to go to work. >> people around here are in too big of a hurry. >> we have a lot to do. finish it we must. >> the farm bill, unemployment benefits, raising the debt ceiling, increasing the minimum wage and immigration reform. >> is there any hope for more action in 2014? >> christmas is one week from wednesday. >> congress will close out the year with more of a womhimper tn a roar. >> this deal is a compromise. >> even when we're functional we're dysfunctional. >> today, a dozen republican
senators joined every democratic senator in voting to end debate on a budget compromise that will keep the government opened through september 15th. this clears the way for a final vote on the bill itself which only needs a simple majority to pass. today's vote was 67-33. the 33 republicans who voted no include mitch mcconnell and ted cruz. john mccain was one of the 12 republicans who voted yes and he said this after that vote. >> i understand that there are many of my colleagues on this side of the aisle that are very unhappy with this deal and intend to vote against it. my only response to that is, i respect their vote but i'd like to know what we do in order to avoid another shutdown of the government. the american people steadfastly reject a shutdown of the
government. so, i have concerns about the budget deal. everybody, i think, does because of the nature of the way business is done but to somehow vote against it without an alternative to keep the budget -- to keep the government from shutting down then i think lacks intellectual integrity. >> the budget agreement will put nearly $32 mill yeb general into and patty murray offered her assessment of this compromise. >> this bill isn't exactly what i would have written on my own. i'm pretty sure it's not what chairman ryan would have written on his own. i was very disappointed we were not able to close a single tax loophole. i hoped we could extend hope for workers fighting to get back on the job and i was very disappointed that up arrepublic refused to let that be part of
the deal. i know it was difficult for many republicans to accept any increases in the bca caps at all. and i know many republicans had hoped this would be an opportunity to make the kind of medicare and social security benefit cuts. they have advocated for in the past but i fought hard to keep them out. >> joining me now, krystal ball and jared bernstein. krystal, this is one of those love john mccain days. just because -- i mean, the guy drives you crazy and then every once in a while there's one of these moments. he could have just voted and went his merry way but he couldn't help but rubbing ted cruz's -- if we don't do this, what do we do? just tell me what we do to avoid a government shutdown and he
said the american public steadfastly rejects a shutdown. >> john mccain was the most vocal senator when ted cruz was pulling his government shutdown shenanigans. he's the one who called him a wacko bird as well. the interesting thing here, too, is that john mccain has been directly honest about what this deal is really about. for both sides, what they wanted to come to the table around was finding a way to avoid at all costs another government shutdown. democrats don't want it because government shutdowns are over and republicans like paul ryan and john boehner and those who voted against it don't want it because it is destruction for their party. now, on the other hand, they haven't ruled out the possibility of going to the wire over raising the debt ceiling but we'll have to i guess worry about that down the road. john mccain calls it like it is. this is about avoiding government shutdown. ultimately it's a relatively
small deal. democrats are upset that there's no unemployment insurance in it. republicans are upset because it raises fees which are really taxes but ultimately we all get to avoid a government shutdown and i think that's good for the country. >> and jared bernstein, john mccain sees adjustments in the sequester level of spending that he wanted to see. >> it's important to tack on to this if you're trying to understand where john mccain is coming from because of the way sequestration was constructed. defense was going to take a $20 billion reduction in its spending cap in 2014. that's something that john mccain and others voted no on the bill really didn't like. but i agree with you, he took a principled stand. but i also want to say -- and i think i'm echoing krystal here, my view is basically what these guys and gals are doing is
partially diffusing a fiscal time bomb that they themselves set. i'll give them credit for compromise and reducing some of the fiscal drag on the 2014 and 2015 economy. that's useful. but this, again, not just a small deal but bringing a tiny bit of rational ity to it that they themselves introduced. >> i have no doubt that john mccain was in one of these tea party primary fights he would have voted against it. the people voting for it were the people who do not have to run for re-election this time. >> yeah, which is fine. at least the votes are there and that's something. mitch mcconnell and others who have tea party challengers are responding to that by moving as far as they can to the right. that's driven a lot of the politics of this year, frankly. it drove the previous government
shutdown. and with john mccain, i think you're right. when he did face a challenge he moved very far to the right on things like immigration that he had long stood for and he's taking a courageous stand, a principled stand. it may look a little different but i'm still glad that he's there to support some sanity at this moment. >> and mcconnell would have voted for this if he wasn't running for re-election. they did something very smart. they didn't want to leave it at just 60 because each one of the republicans who voted for it could have been blamed as being the deciding voter who made this happen. >> right. >> so mcconnell made sure that there was enough of it well over 60 so no individual could be blamed for this and mcconnell made sure it passed. most of the people who voted against it very much wanted to see it passed.
>> don't forget this got a bunch of republican votes in the house. >> yeah. >> 169 republicans voted for this in the house and that's been a heavier lift for anything that wreaks of compromise. so i do think that they found a patch of common ground. an interesting question, one you posed in the introduction, is does this patch of common ground mean that more of this kind of compromise can take place, whether it's unemployment insurance to immigration reform and on that i guess i don't want to be a skunk in a garden party here but i'm not that optimistic. again, this was a small patch of common ground. just because you ran around the block doesn't mean you can run the marathon. >> right. >> and i think you have to -- you could already see members going back to their trenches when you hear paul ryan saying, we're going to extract something over the debt ceiling. that sounds a lot like the language we heard well before the spirit of compromise was
upon the land. >> rush limbaugh has an explanation for this whole thing. >> oh, perfect. >> let's listen to rush. >> they are shell shocked. they are scared to death to say anything critical of obama the democrats. and they will do anything to avoid shutdown, including giving obama that he wants, what we just saw. they have financed obamacare all because they are afraid of another government shutdown. >> rush doesn't seem to know that they increased the defense in this thing. >> he also has no idea of the budget levels that we're talking about this is quite a lot closer to what the republicans have been wanting with paul ryan's budget than what the president wants. they are getting the wins here because they are the less reasonable party so when they show up at the table they extract a lot of things. i want to go back to what jared was saying about whether we can be optimistic about this or not
and whether we'll see compromise in the future like a grand bargain or immigration reform. i also am quite doubtful. i do actually think we could see ultimate leanne extension of unemployment insurance rik weli we've seen in the past and increase in the minimum wage only because they will respond to the fact that those will be brought actually bad issues for the republicans to run against in the midterm election. so there's a lot of movement and momentum growing around those two pieces so we could see those two pieces come together. >> look, if it you start fact checking rush limbaugh, you'll never have time for anything else but let me just say is he wrong in an important way on the sequester point. first of all, they didn't kill the sequester. they relieved less than half of the sequester cuts in this year and considerably -- in 2014 and considerably less than that in
2015. the sequester lasts until 2021. >> jared bernstein and krystal ball, thank you both. >> thanks. coming up, edward snowden writes a fan level to brazil after agreed with him. another honor for pope francis. he's been named person of the year again. this time by a gay magazine. here to accept for the pope, pa father james martin. ♪ [ male announcer ] how could switchgrass in argentina, change engineering in dubai, aluminum production in south africa, and the aerospace industry in the u.s.? at t. rowe price, we understand the connections of a complex, global economy. it's just one reason over 70% of our mutual funds beat their 10-year lipper average. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. request a prospectus or summary prospectus
with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing. with investment information, risks, fees and expenses ...are the hands that do good things for the whole community: the environment, seniors, kids, and animals. that's why we created the share the love event. by the end of this year, the total donated by subaru could reach 35 million dollars. you get a great deal on a new subaru. we'll donate 250 dollars to a choice of charities that benefit your community. it feels good to be a helping hand.
if you're wondering what message president obama would be sending to russia about the country's new anti-gay laws, here it is. president obama won't be attending the opening ceremonies of the 2014 winter olympics in russia. he's sending billie jean king instead, the white house announced today that the tennis
legend will be part of a delegation led by janet napolitano as will gold medal winning figure skater brian boy taun know. it is the first time in at least to years that the delegation does not have any major political leaders in it. up next, edward snowden's letter to brazil and a federal judge's ruling that agrees with edward snowden.
his help to the brazilian senate's investigation of the nsa's, quote, suspected crimes against the brazilian citizens. edward snowden explained that he is currently unable to help and would be an awful lot easier for him to help if he had permanent asylum in brazil. joining me now, steve clemens, washington editor at large and msnbc contributor and john shind letter, former nsa analyst and counter intelligence officer. he's a professor of national security affairs at the naval war college. steve clemens, the judge's opinion yesterday, which i think shocked everyone because it basically involved a district court judge overturning a 1979 decision on which all other decisions were based about what the expectation of privacy is for phone records as opposed to the contents of phone calls. and he couldn't have reached this decision without doing this and i don't think anyone saw that coming. >> well, i think this judge, remember, was appointed by
george w. bush so that's one interesting moment in this. this is a conservative that brought the case and, second, the judge is saying that times have changed and people have a different relationship with their smartphone today than they may have had in the past. the rules have changed and he's saying not that this is unconstitutional but it's probably unconstitutional and he's giving the government six months to come back with an appeal. but it's a shocker because it really turns this game around and begins to look at this question, which even president obama has said, we have to have a debate about the national's security and the people's privacy and the judge bought that. it's a real interesting game changer. >> john shind letter, do you see the judge's ruling as validating edward snowden's concerns? >> only partly. i think this was brought about by larry who is a birther and thinks that our president is a
secret muslim. let's get that out there. and today senator feinstein -- >> larry claim manis the lawyer and plaintiff in this case and he's a well known gad fly is one of the most positive adjectives you can come up with. everything you just said about him is true. he's an outright nut on an awful lot of subjects. >> he's a nut. i think he has a legitimate point but he's a nut. the senator feinstein said today this needs to go to the supreme court. i hope it gets there quickly because i think the american public has a right to hear this adjudicated before the highest court in the land on the fourth amendment. i'm not a lawyer, much less a national securities lawyer. i want to see this go to the supreme court as soon as possible. >> i thought, steve, the strongest element was in the judge's decision when he said, look, pay attention to this 1979 decision. it was for one suspect and the
examination of two days of phone records and that's all and from that case other judges in the 21st century have been using it to justify this mass date unspecified harvest. >> i think this judge is saying, regardless of what case came to them, that he's seeing a problem in society of an unhealthy balance of secrecy, no accountability, judges who have been part of the f.i.s.a. court and i respect dianne feinstein in this process but i also respect ron wyden and mark udall who have been raising compassionate issues. it's not that the judge is dealing with claiman. you've got to get this balance right. >> in edward snowden's letter to
brazil, john schindler, he actually says to brazil about these nsa programs, "these programs were never about terrorism. they are about economic spying, social control and diplomatic manipulation. they are about power." to say that these programs were never about terrorism is about one of the wildest things snowden has said. >> yeah, it is. and it tells me a lot that the brazilians immediately said, no, thank, we're not interested. look, what edward snowden has done is glom together a lot of different intelligence programs, glenn green wald has done the same, to be fair, some of them are about counterterrorism and and i think we need to separate this out.
it's not helpful for the debate. there are utterly legitimate issues about domestic surveillance here. pushing it together with issues of foreign intelligence is not helpful and does not illuminate the debate. nsa is a foreign intelligence agency. some of its collection on metadata, whatever, has implications for american citizens but 90% of what nsa does is purely directed at the outside world. that's a different debate. maybe one we should have? i don't know. every country in the word does foreign intelligence, every single one. >> steve, edward snowden, whenever he speaks, he says something grandiose and usually something prove blee false. this thing about these programs were never about terrorism is provably false and ridiculous. he also says in here that he briefs that this kind of data collection represents the greatest human rights challenge of our time.
now, you have to live in a computer to believe that. you have to never have met people who live in a country with no right to vote, who live under pure dictatorships. you have to never have met the women in this world that have no right to vote or to an education and most of people in this world that do not own cell phones and never in their lifetimes will not be able to avoid a cell phone. you have to do all of that to think this is the greatest human rates challenge of our time. >> that said, edward snowden was a very passionate man who encountered things that disturbed him at his core. he spurred both a domestic debate and international debate that no one has and he has put a big spotlight on what the social contract is between the united states and its allies and the united states and its citizens. and that deserves a bit of -- a calm. because you haven't done that. i haven't done that.
>> i agree. >> that is a remarkable step that he's taken and i would say from the moment when you and i first discussed these revelations, much more of what he has said has turned out to be true and was criticized at the time. we all thought he was grandiose at that time, too. >> he always hits these crazy rhetorical points like the programs were not about terrorism. but the important stuff he says was true. >> look, passion is nice, passion is good. adolph hitler was passionate. we just buried nelson mandela. is what edward snowden doing about justice or personal agenda? >> thank you both for joining me tonight. >> thank you, lawrence. coming up, the man who maybe is going to run on hillary clinton's left in 2016 and in
the rewrite we'll have more about judge leon's decision. a can of del monte green beans? ♪ ♪ if i was a flower growing wild and free ♪ ♪ all i'd want is you to be my sweet honeybee ♪ ♪ and if was a tree growing tall and green ♪ ♪ all i'd want is you to shade me and be my leaves ♪ grown in america. picked & packed at the peak of ripeness. the same essential nutrients as fresh. del monte. bursting with life™.
a body at rest tends to stay at rest... while a body in motion tends to stay in motion. staying active can actually ease arthritis symptoms. but if you have arthritis, staying active can be difficult. prescription celebrex can help relieve arthritis pain so your body can stay in motion. because just one 200mg celebrex a day can provide 24 hour relief for many with arthritis pain and inflammation. plus, in clinical studies, celebrex is proven to improve daily physical function so moving is easier. celebrex can be taken with or without food. and it's not a narcotic. you and your doctor should balance the benefits with the risks. all prescription nsaids, like celebrex, ibuprofen, naproxen and meloxicam have the same cardiovascular warning. they all may increase the chance of heart attack or stroke, which can lead to death. this chance increases if you have heart disease or risk factors such as high blood pressure or when nsaids are taken for long periods. nsaids, like celebrex, increase the chance of serious skin or allergic reactions or stomach and intestine problems, such as bleeding and ulcers,
which can occur without warning and may cause death. patients also taking aspirin and the elderly are at increased risk for stomach bleeding and ulcers. don't take celebrex if you have bleeding in the stomach or intestine, or had an asthma attack, hives, other allergies to aspirin, nsaids or sulfonamides. get help right away if you have swelling of the face or throat, or trouble breathing. tell your doctor your medical history. and find an arthritis treatment for you. visit celebrex.com and ask your doctor about celebrex. for a body in motion.
leads the progressives? or is it the hillary that says i'm going to win the democrat tech nomination and so i can shift hard right on day one. david axelrod said this about brian schweitzer today on "morning joe". >> he's anti-gun control very strongly on the nra side of that issue. he has strong detractors because of the nature of his support for drilling and other aspects of the oil industry which is part of the economy in that part of the country. he does not have the perfect record to run an insurgent campaign from the left. >> joining me now, adam green, co-founder of the progressive
change committee and karen finney. karen, how much room is on hillary clinton's left for a democratic run? >> i think there is a fair amount but i think this idea that she's going to go hard right is a little ridiculous. i don't think anybody would see hillary as a hard right. she might be a center-left person but a hard right i think is unfair. >> adam green, you know, if she runs unopposed, i imagine you would expect certainly a drift to what we might call the center. >> it's possible. >> unopposed in the democratic primaries. >> i think brian schw eechlt ichlt t zechlt was saying she will have to pick a side. the corporate wing, including people like bill clinton's chief of staff, elizabeth warren wing has tom harsh kins from the state of iowa and mark begich
from alaska. let's expand social security benefits, not cut them. same is true of wall street. so, you know, my basic thought is, if hillary clinton firmly says that she supports elizabeth warren's positions on the populism issues, there's very little room to her left. there's little room for a competitive primary change but if she takes the wrong position on those issues, some insurgent could occupy that political space. >> karen, there is the notion that you would be doing hillary clinton a favor by running against her. let's listen to what else david axelrod said about what shapes hillary as a candidate. >> in 2007, she wasn't a very good candidate. she was the front-runner. she was kind of a battleship. i think she got bad advice. in 2008 i think she was a great candidate after obama rocked her
in the first caucuses and it became a race. she got very close to the ground, spoke to the economic concerns of every day americans. did she learn something from that last experience? and this jab from schweitzer, i don't think he creates a real threat to her i think creates an opportunity to reflect on that lesson. >> karen, hillary isn't the only candidate who gets better in competition. >> well, that's exactly right. both candidates got much better in competition. look, the fact that hillary clinton lost the argument of being an agent of change, it was an abomination. she got bad advice in the first part of her campaign. we all accept that and i think axelrod is correct she got better as a candidate but i think it's a little unfair for schweitzer to assume that it's a foregone conclusion. that's how they positioned her at the beginning of 2007 but i
don't think that's the attitude she would take if she decides, i should say, to run in 2016 and i think schweitzer -- let's be honest, if you're a guy that's going to iowa in a few days and most people don't know who you are, that's a good strategy to attack hillary but i don't think it's necessarily a policy argument. >> elizabeth warren has said no, hasn't she? >> there's a number of people saying no. a number of candidates could run and no one expected howard dean in the past and no one expected barack obama in the past. >> i expected barack obama. i thought this guy is on his way. >> well, you are exceptional. >> listen, i never once said i thought hillary was going to win. as soon as i saw that money and the polling indicated he had plenty of room to grow. adam green and karen finney,
thank you both for joining me tonight. >> thanks. coming up in the rewrite, james madison versus the nsa. [ male announcer ] welcome back all the sweet things your family loves with 0-calorie monk fruit in the raw. it's made with the natural, vine-ripened sweetness of fruit, so you can serve up deliciously sweet treats without all the sugar. raw natural sweetness, raw natural success. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] everyone deserves the gift of all day pain relief.
this season, discover aleve. all day pain relief with just two pills. this season, discover aleve. and what would this pretty i'm thinking the ford fusion... ho, ho, ho!....the what? i need a car that's stylish and fashionable... especially in my line of work. now do you have a little lemonade stand? guys, i'm in fashion! but i also need amazing tech too... like active park assist... it practically parks itself. and what color would you like? i'll have my assistant send you over some swatches... oh... get a fusion with 0% financing for 60 months, plus $500 ford credit holiday bonus cash during the ford dream big sales event. but with less energy, moodiness, and a low sex drive,y first. i saw my doctor. a blood test showed it was low testosterone, not age. we talked about axiron. the only underarm low t treatment that can restore t levels to normal in about 2 weeks in most men. axiron is not for use in women or anyone younger than 18 or men with prostate or breast cancer.
women especially those who are or who may become pregnant and children should avoid contact where axiron is applied as unexpected signs of puberty in children or changes in body hair or increased acne in women may occur. report these symptoms to your doctor. tell your doctor about all medical conditions and medications. serious side effects could include increased risk of prostate cancer; worsening prostate symptoms; decreased sperm count; ankle, feet or body swelling; enlarged or painful breasts; problems breathing while sleeping; and blood clots in the legs. common side effects include skin redness or irritation where applied, increased red blood cell count, headache, diarrhea, vomiting and increase in psa. ask your doctor about axiron. [ ding ] i sense you've overpacked, your stomach. try pepto to-go. it's pepto-bismol that fits in your pocket. relief can be yours, but your peanuts... are mine. ♪
here's a tweet that i read the other day that i love. doug tweeted, i profoundly disagree with lawrence politically but admire his efforts to provide something as simple as a desk to students in africa. kids in need of desk know no political boundaries. i'm sure if i learned about a program to provide desks to kids in africa that have never seen desks, i would want to donate. casey tweeted, our class just bought a student in malawi a desk for school. you can, too. it is so great to see how kids would sit at desks all day themselves react to the discovery that kids in african schools don't have desks and that they need desks. kids always want to contribute.
jesmon wrote, "just wrote out a check to u.s. fund for unicef." what is even better, local tradesmen make these desks so the local economy is lifted as well. "very inspiring story, $177 a year pays for one girl's education. i'm donating to the k.i.n.d. fund." girls in africa face many more challenges than boys do in terms of trying to stay in school. "i recently became an m.d. at the age of 58. in the '60s, southern girls were discouraged. hold onto your dreams." "i tear up every time i see images of the children sitting on the floor in classrooms. the k.i.n.d. strategy is smart providing jobs and opportunity. wish there were more like it. glad i was able to endo you two
desks in honor of family members this year." "lawrence, i called and donated. god bless this wonderful cause." you can go to our website, lastworddesks.msnbc.com. and joy reid tweeted, just bought our k.i.n.d. desks, one on behalf of each reid. joy reid has made it an annual event in her family. and finally, danny wrote "lawrence, you are the steve austin of malawi with a $6 billion bionic heart. buying a desk has become my favorite holiday tradition. danny is celebrating the fact that we recently crossed the $6 million mark and now is my four year of campaign standing at
$6,209,745. your kindness is providing desks for hundreds and thousands of malawi students and allowing thousands of malawi girls to continue their education. so i get 2 times the points. and those points add up fast. so, sure, make me the grunt. 'cause i'll be using those points to help me get to a beach in miami. and allllllll the big shots will be stuck here at the cube farm. the citi thankyou preferred card. now earn 2x the points on dining out and entertainment, with no annual fee.to apply, go to citi.com/thankyoucards life's an adventure and it always has been. but your erectile dysfunction - it could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph,
like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial. you stand behind what you say. there's a saying around here, around here you don't make excuses. you make commitments. and when you can't live up to them, you own up, and make it right. some people think the kind of accountability that thrives on so many streets in this country
has gone missing in the places where it's needed most. but i know you'll still find it when you know where to look. (voseeker of the sublime.ro. you can separate runway ridiculousness... from fashion that flies off the shelves. and you...rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle... and go. you can even take a full-size or above, and still pay the mid-size price. (natalie) ooooh, i like your style. (vo) so do we, business pro. so do we. go national. go like a pro. [ male announcer ] they are a glowing example of what it means to be the best. and at this special time of year, they shine even brighter. come to the winter event and get the mercedes-benz you've always wished for, now for an exceptional price.
[ santa ] ho, ho, ho, ho! [ male announcer ] lease the 2014 e350 for $579 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. in the rewrite tonight, james madison versus the nsa. yesterday, federal court judge richard leon wrote a decision finding that the massive collection of security phone records is an unconstitutional privacy which held that it was not an invasion of privacy for the government to examine phone records maintained without a warrant. we had a reasonable expectation of privacy for the content of our telephone calls but that we
had no reasonable expectation of privacy when it came to the records of our phone calls that are maintained by telephone companies for billing purposes. other federal judges have relied on that 1979 case, smith versus maryland, in finding the independent sa data collection programs are, indeed, constitutional, overruling the smith case is the necessary linchpin of judge leon's decision and he does it by asking and answering this question. when do present day circumstances, the evolutions in the government's surveillance capabilities, citizens' phone habits and the relationship between the nsa and telecom become so thoroughly unhike those considered by the supreme court 34 years ago that a precedent like smith simply does not apply? the answer unfortunately for the government is now. so there is judge leon saying,
34-year-old constitutional thinking is now outdated but then judge leon relies on 226-year-old constitutional thinking for the most dramatic flourish in his opinion. "indeed i have little doubt that the author of our constitution, james madison who cautioned us to beware the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power would be aghast." that line is there as nothing more than a rhetorical flourish, an attention getter for the media. that line has no legal meaning or import. it's something judges do all the time to try to align their decision with the great minds of the founding fathers. there is no more abused judicial advice to invoke one of the
founding fathers and assign a judicial opinion to him. and politicians do it all the time, too, telling you that the founding fathers would be aghast at this or that. let's just get something straight about the founding fathers. we have no idea how they would react to the modern world. judge leon's opinion is a well-written, well-reasoned opinion that might prevail on appeal and it might not. but we can only hope that the appeals court judges considering this case will stick with the facts of the case and the applicable law and the constitution and spare us the mind reading of men who have been dead for a couple of hundred years. judge leon would have us believe that james madison would be aghast at nsa data collection.
he would be aghast at the existence of air travel and the internal combustion and birth control pills. we can only wish that james madison had been more aghast at the outrages against the principles of the constitution that he did nothing to correct, things far more insidious and evil than anything the nsa could dream up. james madison was president of the first country in the world to hold this truth to be self-evidence that all men are created equal but james madison was not aghast at slavery. james madison was not aghast at denying women the right to vote but that same james madison would be aghast at nsa data collection. when james madison wrote the constitution, he was a 36-year-old virginia slave owner. he seemed to be, at times,
somewhat troubled by slavery but that didn't prevent him from profiting from it and making sure that slaves would be counted in the census so that the southern slave owners like him would be overrepresented in the house of representatives because they were allowed to count their slaves in the census even though the slaves had no rights of citizenship. it was madison himself who made sure that slaves were counted in the constitution as 3/5 of a human being. in his eight years as president, james madison didn't lift a finger to stop slavery. after his presidency, madison wrote a letter to the marquise de lafayette in 1826 saying the two races cannot co-exist both being free and equal.
james madison became a supporter of a group whose goal was to free slaves and transport them to africa or to the american west. in another letter, madison wrote that, quote, the physical pecuiliarities of those held in bondage would always promote we do know that james madison would be aghast at an integrated cabinet room in the white house, first with african-american members of the cabinet and now with an african-american president presiding over that cabinet, a president elected by a national coalition of voters that included african-americans and women, people who james madison could never imagine even having the right to vote.
but we have absolutely no way of knowing if james madison would be aghast at the tools that that president authorizes the nsa to use to, among other things, protect the court from terrorist attack by haters of america who believe they have a religious imperative to kill as many noncombatant american citizens as possible, people who have committed no greater crime against those terrorists than going to work in the world trade center on september 11th. we have no idea whether james madison would be more aghast at al qaeda than he would at the nsa. and judge leon doesn't know that either. what we do know is that james madison would be aghast at the final judgment on judge leon's opinion being rendered by a
united states supreme court that includes three women and a black man. a subaru... ...are the hands that do good things for the whole community: the environment, seniors, kids, and animals. that's why we created the share the love event. by the end of this year, the total donated by subaru could reach 35 million dollars. you get a great deal on a new subaru. we'll donate 250 dollars to a choice of charities that benefit your community. it feels good to be a helping hand. life with crohn's disease ois a daily game of "what if's". what if my abdominal pain and cramps come back? what if the plane gets delayed? what if i can't hide my symptoms? what if? but what if the most important question is the one you're not asking? what if the underlying cause of your symptoms is damaging inflammation?
the pope is named person of the year again in the last word's priest of the year father james martin will join me next. t where their electricity comes from. they flip the switch-- and the light comes on. it's our job to make sure that it does. using natural gas this power plant can produce enough energy for about 600,000 homes. generating electricity that's cleaner and reliable, with fewer emissions-- it matters. ♪ she'd just grab the bounty select-a-size.
one select-a-size sheet of bounty is 50% more absorbent than a full size sheet of the leading ordinary brand. use less, with bounty select-a-size. became big business overnight? ♪ like, really big... then expanded? ♪ or their new product tanked? ♪ or not? what if they embrace new technology instead? ♪ imagine a company's future with the future of trading. company profile. a research tool on thinkorswim. from td ameritrade. [ male announcer ] this december, experience the gift of unsurpassed craftsmanship and some of the best offers of the year at the lexus december to remember sales event. this is the pursuit of perfection.
just in time for 77th birthday today, pope francis has been named person of the year for a second team in less than a week. last week, of course, it was "time" magazine who bestowed the honor and today "the advocate" named the person of the year. while 2013 will be remembered for the work of hundreds in advancing marriage equality, it will also be remembered for the example of one man in the same way that president obama transformed politics with his evolution of lgbt civil rights. the online magazine points to this statement as a sign of shifting thought in the catholic church which has 1.2 billion
members worldwide. >> the pope tweeted today "the love of god is not generic. god looks with love upon every man and woman calling them by name." pope francis has critics such as rush limbaugh. he celebrated his birthday with a group of homeless men who joined him for mass and breakfast. joining me is father james martin. and you have a new book out here, "a big heart open to god." it's on the teleprompter. i should read it there instead of on the book. "a big heart open to god." . just in time for christmas.
let's see. how much? $17.99. >> it's a steal. >> yeah, you can get it at amazon, it would be cheaper. so the really interesting development with this cardinal raymond burk on the congregation of bishops, the pope has removed him and we have something about what cardinal birk said about the pope wanting to reemphasize and take it away from the things that the church has been talking about. >> i'm not exactly sure why he mentioned it. one gets the impression or it's interpreted in the media this way that we're talking too much about abortion, too much about the integrity of marriage as between one man and one woman but we can never talk enough about that. >> i don't know, i think we can talk enough about that. >> well, and that's about as strong as you're going to get from a cardinal disagreeing with a pope.
>> yes. >> it's a very gentle disagreement but in our interview in this "big heart open to god," it's that we have been focused on too many issues and not that it's not important but there are others to come to fore. he's very clear about that. >> how much more of this kind of bump are we going to see in the road for the pope where there are these public disagreements with more conservative cardinals? >> well, that's a very good question. i wonder if more cardinals will be -- if they do disagree with him will be emboldened to make their disagreement known. i think it's healthy for the church. i don't think there's anything wrong with it. but the pope is also very strong on what he wants to do with the church. >> is this being taken in the church as, hey, that's a firing, this is just somebody who the pope moved out of that position because he disagreed with him and didn't want to hear more from him? >> he appointed archbishop of
washington into the position. he definitely wants someone who thinks differently than the cardinal. >> are you hearing back here any of the pope's personal reaction to what he's getting from the reaction in the world? >> yeah. he said in this interview, i'm getting criticized. >> he's getting a huge -- the advocate picks the pope as the person of the year and that's inconceivable. i mean, there's an amazing kind of positive reaction to him from people who have never had a positive reaction to a pope. >> which is fantastic. i mean, he's drawing people to the church. more importantly, he's drawing people to god. if the advocate puts him on the cover and "time" magazine, if that draws more people to god, great. >> can we get a shot of father martin and me? i know eleanor is watching. father martin's mother, who i
just learned, a big fan of the show, reviews all of your performances, eleanor, i think he did great tonight. i really do. you tell him the truth. you've seen more of his good evening from new york. i am chris hayes. we have watched the right wing steckel through a series of increasingly desperate obama care stairs stories. now they settle on the latest ones. go after obama care the way they went after engelland. >> the obama karen navigators' tapped by the white house to help you enroll in a new health insurance plan, they are at the center of what appears to be