Skip to main content

tv   Meet the Press  MSNBC  February 9, 2014 11:00pm-12:01am PST

11:00 pm
from nbc news in washington, the world's longest running television program, this is "meet the press" with david gregory. >> and good sunday morning. there it is. you're looking live at the olympic xoubd in sochi, russia, on the first weekend of these winter games from the opening ceremonies to the competition as excited as we all are about our athletes we have to say a cloud does hang over the olympics as there's still real concern over the prospects of terrorism, an attempted hijacking raised those fears as a ukrainian man allegedlyt5
11:01 pm
were the republicans right? will obamacare cost millions of jobs or is that a misinterpretation of a new report that came out in washington? i put two leading senators on the spot this morning. meantime, i start off with the roundtable. david brooks from the "new york times," e.j. dionne, as well, andrea mitchell, chief foreign affairs correspondence and this week, mike needham, ceo of the conservative lobbying group heritage action group for america and mona sutphen.
11:02 pm
andrea, get us started. still a lot of concerning about security as great as the games have been so far. >> a lot of concern about security, not just sochi. primarily not sochi but mostly the area, russia. the fact is that officials here in washington are very concerned. they're on pins and needles. when you talk to them, they are sort of crossing their fingersing that russia has this is under control. this is a very tense situation. it's very close to the terror bases in the caucasus. and they know it's vulnerable and there are a lot of people out there who would like to punish putin who has put so much of his personal stock in these olympics. >> e.j., on the world stage, putin focuses our attention on russia, about his leadership and the poor relationship between the united states and russia. what is the impact of all of that beyond the games on the u.s.? >> i'm not sure there this is going to hurt us at all. there's a real problem because our relationship means we're not getting the kind of security information we would like out of the russians.
11:03 pm
but when you see the political controversy here and all the stories in the past, i'm more and more of the view we ought to put the olympics in a fixed number of countries, maybe like greece have the summer games, maybe rotate the winter games, norway, japan, chile, canada. the olympics of having the olympics in a authoritarian country has problems for decades. i would love to see them have permanent spots for the olympics. >> usually there's a copping out party for a rising nation like china. now it's a coming out party for a system that's come and gone. so russia looked rich a few years ago with resources but the leadership is leaving rveth the talent is leaving. corruption is strong. the economy's sagging. it's a touchy-feely egotistical leader with a failing system. that's bound to leaded to ego problems and him compensating more. >> a whole new definition of touchy-feely. >> that's what i was thinking. i want to go to sochi now for
11:04 pm
more on the security threats and this political tension that we've been talking about between the united states and russia. i'm joined now by chief foreign correspondent richard engel on the ground in sochi. good morning. >> reporter: good morning, david. as we all know, it was a very difficult rollout, but now that the games have actually begun, the mood here is improving. there's more focus on the competition, more focus on the athletes, but as all of you were just saying, for russia these olympics are about a lot more than just sports. russia has deployed 70,000 security forces. positioned anti-aircraft rockets around olympic venues. and troops are binoculars to scan for threats in the mountains. moscow spent over $50 billion for a fairy tale opening ceremony and to build two olympic cities. but why? >> putin wants the world to celebrate russia, russia's modernization, russia's wealth. russia's achievements.
11:05 pm
these games are hardly political because the kremlin made them highly political. >> the last time moscow hosted in 19 0, the soviet union dominated nearly all of our asia and eastern europe. a decade later, the berlin wall was down. and the soviet union collapsed. >> for russia, sochi is a symbol of its return, a world power once more. led by vladimir putin. >> but there's a problem with russia's story of revival. it's next door in the ukraine. the ukrainian government is a russian ally but protesters backed by washington want closer ties with europe. this tug of war exploded last week with a leaked "f" bomb. >> youl
11:06 pm
russia claims the games have so far been successful and aside from that threat with the plane that was potentially going to be diverted here to sochi, which turned out to be nothing, there have been no major security concerns. >> richard engel, thanks so much. with the full orchestra playing behind him, i want to turn now to u.s. ambassador to russia, michael mcfaul. ambassador, welcome to "meet the press." >> thanks for having me, david. >> as the games are under way, as i said, there's a focus on our athletes but the threats are real. all the reporting i've done in washington indicates this elevated threat environment. what's your own assessment there as the games have begun on the
11:07 pm
ground? >> well, the threat environment is the primary responsibility for our team on the ground here. we've been preparing for this for several months. actually a couple of years now. we have an office here with about 150 people. the threat assessment has not changed since we've been here. and we accord fate very closely with the russians to share information about anything that might happen. >> the fear is that the russians are not actually sharing everything they've got for fear that the u.s. would exploit that, would somehow try to make them look bad. is that the case? do you know everything you need to know to keep our athletes and others safe there? >> well, we always want to know more. and if you work in the intelligence business, you always want more information from any partner country. that said, we do not have an interest in embarrassing the russians. we have exactly the same interests with them when it companies to the security of everyone here in sochi. so we're quite satisfied with
11:08 pm
the level of cooperation we have now. >> as i said, the cloud over these games politically is not only is it a political charged time, but our relationship with russia seems to be at a real low point. we have a huge debate over the fate of edward snowden who has political asylum there, this latest flap as richard engel was reporting on over russia rather over ukraine and the leaked tape of victoria nuland. what does that say about this moment and how bad things have gotten? >> well, i would expand the list of what is in the tus/russian relationship right now. so all the three issues that you just mentioned are real. we're managing them, we're dealing with the russians in a very serious way, and at the same time, there's continuity in cooperation on a lot of really important security issues for the united states of america. if we're talking about afghanistan, we're talking about iran, syria's chemical weapons, those are all places where we
11:09 pm
continue to cooperate with the russians even as we manage these more difficult issues. and i just think that's the nature of the u.s./russian relationship in the year 2014. some cooperation, some disagreement. >> right you about it goes beyond that, doesn't it? here's vladimir putin who is using this moment to project russian greatness. we saw that in the opening ceremonies. and yet, he's been happy to use edward snowden to embarrass the united states, leaking the intercepted tape of victoria nuland. have you yourself been bugged by the russians? >> well, as we remind all americans that come to this country, the russian government has tremendous capabilities and legal by their law of intercepting phone calls, e-mails, et cetera. there's no doubt that i am a primary subject of interest for them. and from time to time, they have also leaked conversations i have that i thought were private. that's just the state of working
11:10 pm
in russia. it is interesting to me that this doesn't get more attention to our critics and, of course, it goes beyond the pale of diplomatic protocol if indeed the russians were responsible to actually publish a private conversation between two
11:11 pm
when we can, the president has aid said it many times, we want to seek win win outcomes with the russians. when we can't, we're going to pursue our own national interests brought without them and we're going to maintain our commitmenting to universal value, democracy and human rights and we're not going to stop thinking about those things or stop criticizing the russian government in the name of some other outcome we want on the security or trade side. that's our policy. it's been our policy for five years. i this i it's been effective. both in obtaining our outcoles that we want on our interests slug and on being honest and committed to our values. >> this is a time when americans are focused on russia and russian leadership like never before. here's the cover of the economist a week ago, vermont vladimir putin the triumph of vladimir putin is takened photo of him on the ice in the opening ceremonies really built on that. i've talked to friends and family. they say, well, so what's the
11:12 pm
deal with russia is this is it a democracy? david remnick editor of "the new yorker" wrote a piece about putin and writes putin obviously is no democrat. not remotely. he's not interested in the contemporary requirements of human rights. he's not interested in empowering a real legislature or seating is true independents to the courts. democracy is not in his interests. stability and development those are his themes first and last and he regards any and all attempts from the west to call him to account on nearly any issue as acts of anti-russian self-righteousness and hypocrisy. what do you say? >> well, we as an administration first and foremost starting with the president and me as the ambassador here virtually every day are very open in criticizing the russian government when we see some kinds of restrictions on human rights and human rights of all kinds, including with respect to sexual orientation.
11:13 pm
obviously, the delegation that i was a member of here for the opening ceremonies reflects that. and that message i think is very clear. and the second thing i would say moral broadly, you said that putin wants stability and development. i think the history shows that the most stable countries in the world are democracies. and the richest countries in the world are democracies. so we don't see those aspirations as intention with each other. >> do you think that russia has got on the message about gay rights or has it chosen to ignore it? >> no, they got the message. they know exactly where we stand on that issue. and i'm very proud of the way we've communicated our views on that issue. >> do you think there's going to be any movement it significantly within the country on it? >> that's a bigger issue. that's a harder issue because of the domestic politics here. i keep in touch with everybody in that community, in fact, i
11:14 pm
just saw many of their leaders just a few days ago, and we hope that in the long run, that president putin will see economic modernization and political modernization as two things that go hand in hand. >> i want to pin you down one more on snowden. it's been suggested on this program by lawmakers in the intelligence field that edward snowden is perhaps a spy for the russians. do you see evidence that would validate that? >> well, i can't comment on the evidence here or there in terms of those things. what i can say is we want mr. snowden to come home, face the charges against him and have a court of law decide what he has and has not done. >> finally, if you have any expertise there on the ground, give it to us us straight. how do you see the u.s. team doing in the end in terms of gold medals? >> i'm not an expert on that although i've got to tell you, we have had a fantastic time here. we got to see four events yesterday. seeing americans perform in all
11:15 pm
of those. it's a great atmosphere here, by the way, david. it's the american team's feeling very confident. but i don't want to go -- i don't want to get ahead of my skis or beyond my skis. i am not an expert when it comes 0 those things. i hope by the end, we will win. and everywhere i go, of course, i run into lots of russian government officials. i especially want to make sure we're just slightly ahead of the russians. >> all right. we'll leave it there. ambassador mcfall, thank you very much. >> thanks for having me. >> coming up here from hillary clinton's hit list to how husband bill settled scores for the former first lady. new details about the former secretary of state in a brand-new book not out until tuesday. we've got the ex-cluesive first tuesday. we've got the ex-cluesive first look
11:16 pm
11:17 pm
i want you to know stuff i want you to be kind. i want you to be smart. super smart. i want one thing in a doctor. to speak my language. i don't want you to look at the chart before you say hi...david. quiero que me hagas sentir segura. i want you to be awesome. that's the doctor i want. at kaiser permanente, we want you to choose the doctor that's right for you. find your perfect match at kp.org and thrive.
11:18 pm
a hit list kept about her enemies and a fight with husband bill over her 2008 convention speech. new revelations about former first lady hillary clinton in a book not out until tuesday. we're going to have an exclusive interview with the authors here in just a minute. first the key question. hj affect hillary's future if she runs in 2016? >> what are your plans for 2016? >> i'm not thinking about it. i've tried to get other people not to think about it. i'll think about, you know, in the future sometime. >> she says she's not thinking about it but others definitely
11:19 pm
are. polls show hillary clinton with a commanding lead over other potential democrats. "time" magazine asks, can anyone stop hillary? "the new york times" magazine portrays her as planet hillary along with an interplanetary web of her political contacts. but her political opponents on the right blame her for benghazi and kentucky senator rand paul is now repeatedly criticizing bill clinton as a "sexual predator for his relationship with intern monica lewinsky in the late '90s." and now a new book hrc state secrets and the rebirth of hillary clinton" offers an inside glimpse into clinton's evolution in recent years and her inner circle. one of the revelations making headlines, her staff put together a hit list of so-called sinners and saints that measured their support and opposition for her during the 2008 presidential campaign. almost six years later, most clinton aides can still rattle off the names of traitors and the favors that had been done
11:20 pm
for them as if it all had happened just a few hours before. among those rated the most disloyal, senator claire mccaskill of missouri, senator john kerry now secretary of state, and the late ted kennedy whose endorsement of barack obama was a crucial moment in the 2008 campaign. >> and joining moo now the authors of the book hrc, amie parnes and bloomberg news jonathan allen. welcome to "meet the press." >> thank you, david. >> it's great to talk to you before the book comes out. one of the things that's already made news is the concept of the darker part of the world of the clintons, the hit lists, the idea that bill clinton, the former president sort of settling scores, clearing field before there might be a run, jonathan. >> yeah, so the clinton aides during the 2008 campaign kept a list of the people who had been treacherous and over the course of the 2010-2012 election cycles bill clinton went out on the campaign trail and knocked some of these guys out that they didn't like. >> how so? >> so he went and supported
11:21 pm
other democrats in primaries against them and we go through a series of stories in the book as part of the big narrative, one of the light motifs that i like of him knocking out her opponents, people that didn't like her endorsing, raising money for, and this is really part of the story of the clintons, this loyalty. >> almost and having a chilling effect on anybody else who may not be with her down the line, right? >> totally. i think that's why you saw senator claire mccaskill come out very early for her. she was a seven on the hit list. i don't think she was worried. she knew the hatred from the clintons still exists. so i think she tried to get out early and say i am supporting you guys. >> it's interesting when eg we talk about, you talking about this book in terms of the rebirth but also state secrets. in other words the job of secretary of state is so crucial to a potential 2016 run. you write in the book about her approach to the job, and this will be instructive when you debate whether she's a hawk or a dove but also the issues like benghazi. here's what you write about a bias for action.
11:22 pm
hillary also harbors a related trait that one source calls a bias for action which influences her decision making process. it can be seen in her approach to going after bin laden, her building of a coalition to 0 intervene in libya and she encourages her aides to innovate and improvise. she also felt in benghazi, the state department had to be there whatever the risks. that's going to be real fodder for her opponents. >> absolutely. we've talked to republicans. there's a quote in the book from shaun spicer is, the republican national committee chairman about an add the rnc cut and release in 2013 about benghazi. you should get used to seeing that ad. so this is something that's going to be an issue. republicans haven't yet made it something that's beyond partisan. they haven't influenced democrats and independents on it but they're going to try to do that. she's got to come up with an answer for that. >> republicans said it's part of an mind-set, an expeditionary foreign policy belief that she has that's certainly going to be
11:23 pm
a hard thing for her dealing with progressives in the primaries. there are going to be people who come at her from her left. >> certainly. the whole bias fraction thing is yuher. leon pa at the time ta saw the her out early on the bin laden raid. he wanted her buy-in because he knew she would be a hawk. i think that's a big plus for her going in. >> big factor here is the bill factor. how large does he loom? you've heard rand paul in an interview today talking about lewinsky, talking about the past, calling bill clinton a sexual predator. so that issue is there. but it's also to what extent does he play in a campaign which he did so large before in a potential administration. here's a moment from her 2008 campaign convention speech you right about. while stheel had been on a mock stage at the convention center,
11:24 pm
but with her there's a blind spot. you see this visceral reaction to what's going on with her that he has. it's a problem for him.
11:25 pm
look, there's been the al gore method, distance yourself from bill clinton. that didn't work. there was the 2008 hillary clinton method, you know, sort of of let him do what he's doing, he's a good strategist. barack obama is the one that figure the out how to use him. put him out as a surrogate but don't let him do a lot of interviews with the press. if she can get him to do what he did on the 2012 campaign trail and we go deep into that in the book, she will serve herself well. >> interesting nuggeting about david petraeus, former head of the cia, commander in afghanistan hog had to resign because of his extramarital affair. he says she would be a tremendous president. that's a real endorsement for somebody that she showed a lot of the kindness to actually when he went through his own disgrace. >> yes, she wrote him a note actually and she said, i've had a little experience with this which we thought was a really interesting moment. she tends to warm up to people. she might not be as geg grayerious as her husband but very much a politician in her own way.
11:26 pm
>> bottom line here, is there anything that says she doesn't run? is it just a matter of time? >> watching the olympics it's like the ski jumper. she's headed down the hill. there's little that's going to stop her from launching. we talk about the preparation going on on, her top aide has been doing interviews about the 2016 campaign in particular. guy cecil most often mentioned as a possible campaign manager sat down with her june, they talked who should be the campaign manager. he's made up his mind if he's asked he's going to do it. this is a campaign in full swing. it's more a question of whether she stops running than whether she starts. >> nice olympic tie-in there. very well done. >> absolutely. thanks very much. so what will be the rallying cry for the opposition to a hillary clinton run in 2016? here is kentucky senator rand paul in an interview airing on c-span today. >> i really think that anybody who wants to take money from bill clinton or have a fund-raiser has a lot of
11:27 pm
explaining to do. i this i they should give the money back. if they want to take a position on women's rights by all means do. you can't do it and take it from a guy using his position of authority to take advantage of young women in the workplace. >> senator rand paul. i'm back here with the round table, mike needham lobbyist with heritage action. here's the question i think we have to resolve. how does hillary clinton position herself as something other than a default establishment choice with a complicated past and members in your own party are saying we're not going to let the past be forgotten. >> i think it's a big challenge for her and probably the biggest challenge out there is actually obamacare. if you look at the policy in obamacare, it's similar to what hillary ran on in 2008 than barack obama. barack obama in the ohio primary said it would be unfair to make people purchase something that they can't afford to purchase with regard to the individual mandate. so i think she like many democrats coming up in the 2014 senate races are going to have a big trouble getting away from obamacare which are the policies she advocated for six years ago.
11:28 pm
>> whether it's impeachment, whether it's obamacare, it's benghazi, mona, is that you're a veteran now of the obama white house. same question. how does she position herself as a candidate of the future? >> first, i'm not sure that anybody knows exactly what her decision making process is or what the timeline will be. >> right. >> but she clearly is in no rush to make a decision and frankly, why should she? she's got everything she needs to run a fantastically successful presidential campaign, star power, organization, institutional support. i think she's got the skill set and the background that you need to be a president in this time in our nation's history which is an ability to deal with complexity and nuance and all the tradeoffs that come with being president of this country. so i actually think she's going to take her time as she should because it's a pretty conscious conventional decision and she knows that more than in anybody else. >> the campaign ads, jonathan was pointing out at the end of that interview, the campaign's in place. there are two pacs. they've divided the lines of
11:29 pm
authority. they've got potential campaign managers lined up. she's got her book to do. she doesn't want a campaign announcement to muddy up her book tour. that's going to be a very big book next summer we believe. so at that point, after that she doesn't need to put in place the fund-raising apparatus and as was reporteded in hrc, they have kept very close all the fund-raisers, the big money people. she did in fact when she was at the state department you would see at state department events a lot of big moneyed people. they have always been part of her circle. it's never been disbanded. >> the bigger question of how not whether but how she positions herself herself, e.j., is what i'm really interested in, how she runs. >> she's got a great advantage which is she was in the obama administration, and if president obama's doing pretty well at the end of 2015 or 2016, she can talk about being the candidate of continuity. she's also been out for four years. if you want somebody really
11:30 pm
experienced she can run that way. the thing that i am struck by when people like senator paul raise the old bill clinton story is she always had the best answer to that in 2008, which is what part of peace and prosperity didn't you like? and the country's kind of fought through bill clinton and they said yes, there is this is aspect of him connected to the scandal. but there's still a lot of fondness for the prosperity and she almost beat barack obama, if she had not messed up the beginning of the campaign been overconfident and fallen behind on delegates, she won the second half of that primary campaign. so she is a formidable politician. >> what if the president is not doing well though? does she run away from him? does that anger the base? that's the pitfall. >> she's got all the campaign staff, all the money. that's unimportant in the campaign i think. campaign i t]]gqá. how is she going to govern so it looks different than under obama. >> secondly, what are her issues? she's got to have three big
11:31 pm
issues that don't look like barack obama's issues. coining i don't think she has that. i don't think she really is going to be able to appeal to the left and the base of the party. i think there's a 30, 40% chance jiri brown would be -- he's a little old, would be ideal, right personality, right state, right performance. there's going to be a challenge from the left. >> one of the challenges for hillary is the bill clinton of today is not the bill clinton e.j. was just talked about. he was a moderate democrat president. harold ford was the upcoming star of the democrat party. today bill clinton is out there doing events with bill deblasio, the progressive mayor of new york city. over the last ten years, through the iraq war, through the primary challenge joe ses tech put up to joe lieberman, through the rice and fall of howard dean how the democrat party has become so much more progressive. >> it's the democratic party and i think that that misread who's bill clinton was. bill clinton always had a strong populist streak, one of the reasons he won in 1992. yes, he had the correction that
11:32 pm
the democratic party needed. he campaigned on raising taxes for the rich in 1992. this is not -- >> there's a big gap between the era of big government is over and bill deblasio saying the horses that go around central park -- >> let me get mona back into this. andrea raised something before that is very interesting. is hillary clinton alex tension of president obama, a third term? there's a lot she has been an advocate behind the scenes. the books talks about that for health care reform. she's certainly been pretty hawkish in a way, you know, driving a lot of his policies. so where does his presidency end and his begin? >> a lot of it companies 0 down to how the competent is doing at that point, 2015. if things are moving forward and it looks like gdp growth is going to continue to pick up, the job picture looks better, she'll be able to say we've started to build the pillars of you new united states. let's keep that going.
11:33 pm
she's got room to show there's a dins in her approach. she can pull back to the clinton era in terms of style and the way they approach politics. >> i think in the general election, huge advantage because of the demographics. but get through the primaries -- i'm not sure the economy will help so much. >> she'll also have to show what she achieved as secretary of state. benghazi will be raised over and over again. she has to show real accomplishments, and that is completely up in the air. we see what john kerry is doing and what negotiations are in play in iran. >> so the politics of 2016 to the politics of the moment here in washington, a big one is health care. so the cbo, congressional budget office issues an report this week. all of a sudden you get the debate right back whether obamacare is a job killer. here are some of the headlines after that report from the hill. obamacare will cost 2.5 million workers by 2024. "the wall street journal" health law to cut into labor force, "new york times" health care law projected to cut the labor force
11:34 pm
that's not exactly what the cbo said. but strike the word cbo. these were congressional researchers who issued this report, e.j. you wrote about it strongly this week. >> this did not say obamacare is a job killer. on the contrary, when doug elmendorf of the cbo testified he said this probably net create jobs. just think about the money put in people's pockets saving on their insurance from subsidies. what it said is some people might temporarily or leave the labor force. we're supposed to be for family values. you have a couple where somebody wants to leave the labor force for a couple years to take care of their kids. under the old system if that person carried the health insurance, they didn't have the option to leave. now they can. what you're doing is expanding people's choices. but you are also in the end going to create jobs out of it. >> this is a lot to explains and for a lot of republicans. >> i think people get the choice part. >> but there are still a lot of republicans who will say look, we told you it was going to have
11:35 pm
a huge impact on the labor force, some of which we truly don't understand. if you don't like obamacare, you may have a new reason. >> there are going to be a lot fewer people in the labor force. 2 million people who have a stronger incentive to get out of the labor force. the marginal tax rates go super high as you go up the income scale. we want people at home helping kids and people in the labor force to be a growing country. this is not good for that. >> what you can do about the labor force, the most dramatic thing is do something about immigration. that is what is now stymied. we don't know yet wlts john boehner means it or is just trying to calm down his republican caucus. mike and heritage have been very, very powerful this past week in scaring the peeker of the house. >> moneyna, make a point about health care. >> let's put the people in context. 145 million people in the workforce. we're talking about in this country, and i've worked with a
11:36 pm
lot of silicon valley companies, in america today a lot of what you see, who are starting businesses? people who he already have means and people young and don't have families. one of the reasons is people are tied down because of health care. so the idea that some people may ultimately fall out of the workforce but you have a whole group of people who may decide i'm going to start that new business and that in turn will create. >> hold on. a comment from mike here. >> the cbo debate has been one of those great moments that illustrates how washington, d.c. confuses the debate. here you have some of the same people who look at paul ryan's plan to strengthen medicare by providing premium support so that medicare exists for future generations and current generation and call that pushing granny off the cliff. people who look at mitt romney's career that created jobs and opportunities and say he's a guy who murdered some woman who had cancer that now say because you look at a cbo report that does say it's going to cost 2.5 million jobs, you're being unfair because you're not saying the implicit tax margins under
11:37 pm
the subsidies in obamacare are going to cause the labor demand to dry up. >> quick comment, e.j.ing >> this point about small businesses so important, a scholar at harvard has shown in countries that guarantee everyone health insurance, there's a faster rate of small business creation than there is in the united states. >> it says workers. there is a very big distinction. >> let me get a break. we're going to continue this debate, by the way, in just a moment. the battle lines drawn in congress over this very issue, talking about immigration, the debt ceiling and the obamacare conversation we've been having. will it cost millions of jobses? two key senators will be here to have that debate coming up next. "mee
11:38 pm
11:39 pm
♪ [ man ] i don't know if this is gonna be a first or second, but this is gonna be a medal! [ man #2 ] and it looks like we could have another one of those photos! [ female announcer ] every minute. every medal. every screen. the nbc sports live extra app gives you unprecedented access to every moment of nbc universal's coverage of the sochi olympics, now on your tv. the x1 entertainment operating system, only from xfinity.
11:40 pm
>> coming up, the battles in washington ahead from the debt ceiling to immigration. will anything get done this year? i'll put two influential senators on the spot coming up next. now it's your turn to bring something to the table. here's today's
11:41 pm
11:42 pm
and we are back. so if you're betting big things are to get done in washington and congress this year, you might have been wrong.
11:43 pm
the glimmer of hope from the budget deal seems like it's disappeared with the battle lines now drawn over key issues and a new fight over the impact of obamacare. chuck schumer of new york and republican senator rob portman of ohio. welcome back. >> good to be back. >> you've been listening to this debate with the roundtable over obamacare. senator schumer, here is an ad by the group americans for prosperity in this midterm election year that they're going to be running hard. watch. >> who told us. >> -- a system that eases up the pressure on businesses and unleashes the promise of our economy creating hundreds of thousands of jobs. >> but now we find out obamacare will reduce full-time employment by 2.3 million jobs. >> hurting the economy. and middle class families. >> so for democrats who thought senator schumer, that obamacare was going to be a plus in this election year, are you on the defensive again? >> i don't think so. bottom line is very simple. what cbo said is that many american workers would have
11:44 pm
freedom. now, that's a good work, freedom to do things they couldn't do. the single mom who is raising three kids has to keep a job because of health care can now spend some time raising those kids. that's a family value. the student, 27 years old, wants to finish school quickly so he can get a great job. can't because he needs health care, is now free. you know, david, when we pass the 40-hour workweek 100 years ago, it reduced hours but it certainly was regarded as a step forward, and i'd say two other things here. number one, cbo used 2017 full employment as the baseline. many people when the folks like the single mom and the student and the small businessman who wants to now start a small business and can, when those people leave their jobs in 2015, '16, '14, '15, '16 others are going to take those jobs. finally in 2017 if there's full employment and no one it to take
11:45 pm
those jobs, it will raise wages. this is a net plus. i'd say one final thing. >> let me get a sons from senator portman man. i'm sure you're happy to have democrats on the offensive. why shouldn't this be seen as freedom for folks who didn't have it before? >> it's not that i'm happy to see democrats on the defensive. i'm worried about the american worker. we've got in our country right now a 35 year low in terms of labor participation. we don't have as many people in the workforce as during the middle of the recession. and yet, you have democrats almost giddy about the fact that oh, boy, now we're going to have fewer people in the workforce. that doesn't help workers. it doesn't help in terms of fighting poverty. look, cbo was very clear. they said this is going to result in fewer people wanting to work. what they didn't say, david, which is going to make this even worse is for many employers are not hiring people because of obamacare. 70% in some of the surveys of small businesses are saying it is already harming their ability to hire people. why? for a few reasons.
11:46 pm
one is you have these employer mandates in place saying if you have over 50 employees you're part of this. you have companies saying i'm not going to get over 50 meez, some.cans letting people going certainly not growing employment. second you have people saying i'm not going to let people work more than 30 hours. there's a new 40-hour workweek, senator schumer. it's a 30 hour workweek. higher health care costs is driving the cost of doing business up and therefore, fewer people are getting hired. i hear it in ohio all the time. i'm going to do more with part time and overtime. i'm not going to hire people. finally 19 new taxes in this thing. a trillion dollars in new taxes. that wasn't even analyze inside the cbo report. there were a bunch of promises made and none are being kept. you could keep your health care. >> let's stick to this issue and to the question at hand. you brought up the american worker senator portman but you voted this week against extending unemployment benefits for those out of work.
11:47 pm
it's striking. i wonder what you say to those as been reported in your own state, more than 50,000 ohio residents who had unemployment benefits end in december. those folks really hurting. why did you vote against that? >> well, david, first of all i'm one of six republicans that voted to allow the debate to go forward. unfortunately the democrats wouldn't negotiate with us how to pay for it. but again, let's get back to the problem at hand. i said we've got a 35-year low in terps of the numbers working and the participation rate. we are record numbers of people long-term unemployed. the democrats answer to that is let's add more to the 26 weeks of unemployment insurance but do nothing to reform the program and give people the skills this he need to can assess the jobs out there. again, record numbers of people long-term unemployed. all the republicans were saying including me was look, yes, let's extend unemployment insurance. one, let's pay for it. last thing we want to do is add to the debt and deficit and make the economy worse.
11:48 pm
let's reform this program. i have a specific proposal to do that as do a group of republicans enough to get it across the floor. we need to work with the democrats to get that done. >> a response from senator shumer. >> bottom line is, our colleagues on the other side of the aisle are telling people what's good for them but the people don't want it. the person looking for a job for six months, eight months doesn't want to be told, doesn't want to be told they shouldn't get unemployment benefits to keep their house, to keep their car, to pay for gas, to look for a job. the single mom who would like to go home and raise her three kids doesn't want to be told you have to keep that job because we're not going to give you health care. that's the about line. >> senator schumer, immigration, a big focus for you and here you have the house speaker after saying this was the year to do it saying he doesn't see it happening. is this had gamesmanship on his part or is this really over? >> well, you no he, it's been a tough week for immigration. but all three, many of the republicans have said the following speaker boehner, mitch mcconnell, paul ryan, even jim demint have said they want to do
11:49 pm
immigration reform. but they don't trust the president to enforce the law, particularly the enforcement parts. so there's a simple solution. let's enact the law this year. but simply not let it actually start till 2017 after president obama's term is over. now, i think the rap against him that he won't enforce the law false. he's deported more people than any other president. but you col actually have the law start in 2017 without doing much violence to it. you'd simply move the day back from december 31st to 2011 to december 31st, 2013 as to when people, the deadline for people who could get either legalization or citizenship so we could go after the new people who come in later. and it would solve the problem. make no mistake about it, david. this view that we can get this done in 2015, '16 is false. you'll have the republican presidential primaries, to pull people over to the right.
11:50 pm
tea party maximizes. so simple. let's say to our republican colleagues you don't trust obama? enact the law now but put it into effect in 2017 and we can get something real done for in irk. >> i an response for senator. is boehner at risk of losing his job if he pursues this? >> no, i think john boehner is fine in terms of his job. i do think our immigration system is broken. what chuck talks about delaying it, i think some republicans would be interested in that if we put in place the enforcement measures so it would work. in other words, make sure the border is secure, make sure you have a workforce enforcement program that works. the concern is to get back to the 1986 law. last time we did this, where we did provide legalization but didn't do enforcement, another 6 million came illegally. that's what republicans are looking for enforcement first. >> senators schumer and portman, thanks so much. coming up here, the roundtable responds a little bit and we'll
11:51 pm
11:52 pm
♪ [ man ] i don't know if this is gonna be a first or second, but this is gonna be a medal! [ man #2 ] and it looks like we could have another one of those photos! [ female announcer ] every minute. every medal. every screen. the nbc sports live extra app gives you unprecedented access to every moment of nbc universal's coverage of the sochi olympics, now on your tv. the x1 entertainment operating system, only from xfinity.
11:53 pm
weigh come right back with our roundtable. the news just made by senator schumer, how it's going to drives the immigration debate schumer, how it's going to drives the immigration debate s hagetting out of bed in the morning because my back hurt so badly. the sleep number bed conforms to you.
11:54 pm
i wake up in the morning with no back pain. i can adjust it if i need to...if my back's a little more sore. and by the time i get up in the morning, i feel great! if you toss and turn at night, have back pain ... ... or wake up tired with no energy, the sleep number bed could be your solution. the secret to the sleep number bed is the air chambers and its exclusive dual air technology. the only bed that puts you in control of firmness and lets you adjust to your ideal comfort and support: your sleep number setting. and this bed is perfect for couples because each side adjusts independently to each person's unique sleep number setting. here's what clinical research has found. 93% of participants experienced back pain relief. 90% reported reduced aches and pains. 87% fell asleep faster and enjoyed more deep sleep. for study summaries, call this number now. we'll include a free catalog about the sleep number bed, including a product guide and prices-plus a free $50 savings card. on an ordinary mattress, steel springs can cause uncomfortable pressure points.
11:55 pm
but the sleep number bed contours to your body. imagine how good you'll feel when your muscles relax and you fall into a deep sleep. i'm not just a back surgeon, i'm also a back patient. i sleep on the sleep number bed myself and i highly recommend it for all of my patients. need another reason to call? the sleep number bed costs about the same as an innerspring, yet lasts twice as long. so if you want to sleep sounder and deeper, find relief from back pain ... call now. call the number on you screen for your free information kit with catalog and price list. call now and you'll receive a free $50 savings card just for inquiring about the sleep number bed. ask about our risk-free 100-night in-home trial. call this number now for your free information kit and a free $50 savings card. call now. back to you with the
11:56 pm
roundtable. e.j., you've got all your foets lined up. i want to make very clear you've taken a lot of notes. senator schumer may have slansed something to get this imdprags debate back on track. >> i think he's trying to call the bluff of the republicans, john boehner, paul ryan have been saying we can't trust obama. so what he's saying is okay, the new law will not take effect until after obama leaves office. and i think john boehner and paul ryan are really on the line here because they've been sending signals privately to all kinds of pro immigration groups. they really want to do this. they've shown some guts and now they're in danger of looking gutless by folding at the first signs of pressure. so i think -- >> is that your pressure, mike needham, as a conservative lobbyist. >> the pro immigration groups he's talking to are big business lobbyists in washington, d.c. we needk$l@ modern immigration system. the bill schumer is talking about is a comprehensive bill that gets into detail of how many ski instructors will be
11:57 pm
allowed to come into the system. american people are bored how to change the status quo which is broken on the margin and instead looking for big bold ideas. >> every college president in the country is saying you've got to fix this, especially for the hi-tech jobs. >> we do. that's why the house of representatives in the 11th congress passed a bill to expand the number of visas. these fights are about how to change the status quo. lobbyists are happy. >> it's not about who runs the republican party. do the leaders to want to have a presidential national future as a multiracial party, do they run the party or does mike run the party? the truth is, mike runs the party. >>. >> moneyna, go ahead. >> it's primary season. i completely get it if you're house member worried about a primary challenge having the debate come up in the height of the primary filing system. that might not be a great time. as the lens starts to shift from the midterms to the 2016 race, this is going to become clearer
11:58 pm
that this issue has to become resolved. >> not have millions of people with no documentation and all of these children, as well. this is an unsustainable situation. >> everybody agrees with that and the republican party should be strong enough and big1 #÷ en we can have a fak-based debate what the right way to do any issue. we're doing a conference tomorrow. it's a conservative reform conference. nine hours of people coming over. senator tim scott talking about school choice reform, senator ted cruz talking about access to energy. these are all things the country needs and that conservatives have good reform ideas. the problem is that you have a broken status quo in washington, d.c. where where 33,000 lobbyists say we're not going to let anything truly bold go forward because then there's wenners and losers. we prefer the current system where we can pick winners and losers by working with hillary clintoning >> probably i go to your conference, i'll agree. i just don't see the political path. explain to me demographically
11:59 pm
how does the party survive without immigration. >> how are those lobbyists different from you as a lobbyist. >> by showing the republican party is on the side of the overwhelming majority of the american people who don't feel heard in washington. they're right. we don't center a tax code about raising money to fund government. >> african-americans, asian-americans how do you reach those people? >> beneed to reform our immigration system. there is more student loan debt in this country right now than there is credit card. >> it tells you something about what is going to drives the weeks ahead is this immigration debate. thank you all for a spirited discussion this sunday morning. appreciate it very much. meantime, as you all know, the winter olympic coverage will continue from sochi on nbc. reigning u.s. cham gracie gold competes in figure skating. five-time olympic medalist bode miller tries for the gold in men's downhill skiing. go usa. that's all today. we'll be back next week. if it's sunday, it's "meet the we'll be back next week. if it's sunday, it's "meet the press."
12:00 am
-- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com amazing crashes. >> there's an enormous bang. and then i felt the car go by me. >> wild, high speed chases. a calamity in the sky becomes a nightmare on the ground. >> get back, get back, grandpa. >> people were yelling and screaming. just hysterical. >> a sudden impact catapults a motorcyclist into midair. a thrill seeker pushes the limit and pays the price. >> i looked down at him. his eyes were rolled back in his head. i was hoping he'd be alive. >> helicopters in distress. extreme crash landings. >> really had no control. the best i could do was brace myself. >> distracted drivers with no

85 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on