tv All In With Chris Hayes MSNBC January 15, 2016 5:00pm-6:01pm PST
cancer. tonight on "all in" -- >> i'm very, very angry. >> the sum of all fears. >> americans are feeling frustrated and scared and angry. >> trump and cruz dominate as the republican establishment shutters. >> we're almost terrorized as members of our party. >> today's fallout from the first debate of 2016. plus, hurt feelings over new york values. >> that was a very insulting statement that ted made. >> but is it an effective attack anyway? then the clinton campaign keeps the attack up on bernie. >> senator sanders has said he wants to do, which is basically to start all over again. >> both campaigns respond tonight. and return of the birthers. >> i'm not going to be taking legal advice from donald trump. >> you don't have to. >> why ted cruz may have an actual legal problem now that
orly taitz is on the case. >> he said he had a birth certificate. so why wouldn't you provide it? >> when "all in" starts right now. good evening. from new york. i'm chris hayes. last night's debate made painfully clear what has slowly been dawning on the republican party. just over two weeks until the iowa caucuses. donald trump is setting the terms of the race. he is the man to beat. and to the extent that anyone else in the field can stop him, the only one putting up a real fight is the one candidate the establishment seems to like even less than donald trump. ted cruz, who last night went head to head with trump for the very first time. new polling out yesterday shows exactly what the stewards of the gop's electoral chances have to be worried about. in a three-way race between trump, cruz, and establishment favorite marco rubio, rubio finishes third while trump and cruz get a combined 71% of republican support. that was pretty much the dynamic on stage last night, with trump and cruz trading shots and dominating the debate and the
rest of the field struggling to make an impact. in one of the testiest exchanges of the evening they tangled over trump's suggestion that cruz might not be eligible to run for president because he was born in canada. >> back in september my friend donald said that he had had his lawyers look at this from every which way and there was no issue there. there was nothing to this birther issue. now, since september the constitution hasn't changed. but the poll numbers have. >> the fact is there is a big overhang. there's a big question mark on your head. and you can't do that to the party. you really can't. you can't do that to the party. >> likewise, the two front-runners got into it over recent comments by cruz that trump's "new york values" put him out of step with the republican electorate. >> everyone understands that the values in new york city are socially liberal, or pro
abortion or pro gay marriage, focus around money and the media. >> new york is a great place. it's got great people. it's got loving people, wonderful people. when the world trade center came down, i saw something that no place on earth could have handled more beautifully, more humanely than new york. >> marco rubio succeeded at interrupting the duo. his rehearsed talking points failed to make much of a splash. and later on a devastating jab from chris christie seemed to sum up rubio's performance. >> i hate to interrupt this episode of court tv, but the real -- i think we have to get back to what this election has to be about. this is the greatest country in the history of mankind. but in 2008 we elected a president that didn't want to fix america, he wants to change america. >> you already had your chance, marco. you blew it. >> perhaps the most telling exchange was one between trump and jeb bush on the subject of trump's proposed ban of all muslims from coming into the
country. now, though bush had proposed his own religious test for refugees, bush also did come out strongly against the trump proposed ban on all muslims, and one of his own top advisers publicly called it fascism. but last night this was all the outrage bush could muster against the gop front-runner. >> we're running for presidency of the united states here. this isn't -- this isn't a different kind of job. you have to lead. you cannot make rash statements and expect the rest of the world to respond as though, well, it's just politics. every time we send signals like this we send a signal of weakness, not strength. and so it was a statement. which is why i'm asking him to consider changing his views. >> asking him to consider changing his views. if he would just, you know, maybe think about it. jeb bush is not the only republican who appears however belatedly to be coming to terms with donald trump's ascendance. for as long as donald trump has led the polls the republican party seemed to be in a state of denial clinging to a belief that he'd eventually implode on his
own. buzzfeed reported this week that "major republican donors and well funded political groups have failed to fund a robust anti-trump campaign despite increasingly desperate pleas from some quarters of the gop." now with iowa looming it's clear that trump and the political current he has unleashed are not going anywhere. and as their denial fades, the party's desperation is growing. earlier this week south carolina governor nikki haley used her state of the union response to publicly warn fellow republicans against the kind of politics trump and cruz are exploiting. and today according to politico at a closed-door session of the rnc's winter meeting one committee member got up out of the blue and pleaded with chairman reince priebus to take a stand against trumpism. >> you get this energy in the nation right now that is angry, frustrated, and they want to hit anybody. so we have certain candidates that are sucking that up and changing our label.
as a party weo it to ourselves to speak out and not have the tail wag the dog. >> joining me now, congressman steve king, republican from iowa, who has endorsed ted cruz. and congressman, let me start with this. i have to say i think you're due a victory lap after last night's debate. it is pretty clear that you have waged a battle against the republican establishment for years, particularly on the issue of immigration, but on a bunch of issues, but particularly on that issue. and it's your party now. it's very clear if one thing came across last night between trump and cruz, it is the steve king party, particularly on immigration. >> well, chris, i just -- i thank you for seeing that and saying so. for me the center of this has always been about restoring the rule of law, and it goes all the way back to 1986 when ronald reagan signed the amnesty act. i kicked a dent in my filing cabinet i was so frustrated. i thought he would protect that principle, the rule of law, and i knew he would be spending -- i
wasn't in public policy there but i knew all of us would try to restore respect for the rule of law once we rewarded people for breaking it. that seems to have emerged here in the debate and the presidential debate and those that are leading in the polls in a substantial way have embraced the rule of law. secure our borders and let this american immigration policy be designed to enhance the economic, the social and the cultural well-being of america. >> cultural well-being. speak of culture and cultural well-being, the candidate you've endorsed, ted cruz, has take smen heat for his attacks on new york values. i think you said this morning you thought it was maybe not a great line of attack. he has definitely doubled down on it today. here's my question for you. everyone in new york is all upset about it, obviously. i'm a lifelong new yorker. so you know, no one likes your place being insulted. i've got to say i have nothing but love for iowa. i love iowans. love the hawkeyes. you guys are great. love iowa values. does this play in iowa? do you guys really hate us so much that this is a smart thing to do? >> you know, chris, we don't. there was a distance -- >> well, thank you, congressman.
>> there was a distance between iowa and new york, but september 11th changed all of that. and i remember seeing the face of a new york man, an african-american, covered with ashes and soot, and the tears going down his cheek and at that moment i knew we're tied in this together, we're in this together completely and all the way. and all across america people descended upon america to do all they could to help that american crisis that happened there. and i don't have any doubt ted cruz sees it the same way -- >> congressman, can i just say that it's a little perverse to say that we really did kind of hate and you then 3,000 of you were murdered and then we realized you were part of the country. there's something a little perverse about that. >> there's something perverse about the question, chris. >> i'm not the one running around -- i'm not the one -- could you imagine if i got here on my television show every night and railed against iowa values? i mean, that would be a jerky thing to do. >> okay. here's the case, is that -- >> but wouldn't that be true? >> i'm trying to express to you
the affection, the bond that pulled all america todgether. it wasn't just iowa and new york. when we saw what happened in new york -- and by the way, don't forget the attack on the pentagon and shanksville as well. all of that pulled america together. and the tragedy that new york suffered more greatly than anyone else was spread across this country, and by the way, we have lost more than twice as many americans in uniform in reaction to the strike on september 11th. >> yes. >> so we've all suffered across this and other countries have suffered too. >> so let me ask you this. did ted cruz make a mistake when he used this phrase to attack donald trump? >> no, i don't think it was a mistake, chris. but what i saw donald trump turn that into an emotional argument, i knew it was going to be in the news today. i didn't know i'd be sitting here talking about it. but the point is this. donald trump himself has characterized new york values, his values, and contrasted them with iowa, and i'm thinking of, what, october 24th, 1999 interview with tim russert where
he said that if he had come from iowa he might think differently but he has supported -- he said i'm very pro choice. no, he wouldn't ban partial birth abortion and he would support same-sex marriage. those -- and he characterized them as new york values. so i'm confident that that's what ted cruz was referring to. >> i see. >> and by the way, the tragedy of september 11th didn't change the politics of new york. barack obama carried manhattan 84%. >> oh, yes. i'm well aware. congressman steve king, thank you very much. >> thank you, chris. >> joining me now, conservative columnist a.j. delgado and josh barro, correspondent for the upshot at "the new york times" and an msnbc contributor. a.j., i know you are a trump supporter, which i can't quite believe but you are. i say that because i genuinely enjoy you on twitter and your writing. what did you think of last night's trump and cruz exchanges? >> i thought it was -- i thought trump did brilliantly. really all he needed was a
b-minus performance to maintain this incredible lead that he has, but he really delivered an a-plus one. what i couldn't believe when ted cruz made those comments about new york, just how perfectly, not only was it a huge error and a huge mistake, unlike what congressman king noted, it was a huge mistake, it was a huge insult to the entire state of new york, but then to set it up, to tee it up so perfectly for donald trump to deliver what is probably the most emotional, beautiful answer that we've seen in this entire primary season where he really had a chance to connect emotionally with everybody watching. was just an ideal situation for trump to really shine. and it really showed who he is as a person. it was a really interesting situation to see him kind of get personal. and he did. he was almost choking speaking about it. >> it shows he's actually a new yorker, which if you know one thing about donald trump the guy is a new yorker. we'll talk more about new york values later in the show. >> yeah. >> but to me it's like why are you running around -- i just can't imagine a similar line of attack flying anywhere else. >> yeah.
well, also donald trump is not just a new yorker. he's a guy who was building luxury condos in manhattan in 1982 at a time when people thought the city was dying. he really kind of built his career on a core belief in new york at a time when that was going out on a limb. so i think this is donald trump changes a lot with the fashions. he says what people want to hear. but i think that's real, that donald trump has passion about new york. i'd compare it to carly fiorina, who had this tweet saying, well, i went to stanford but i'm rooting for iowa to win the football game today against stanford. which everyone thought was ridiculous pandering. you're supposed to rep the place you're from. so donald trump even though a lot of these people do have real policy disagreements with people from new york i think people respect the fact that he is proud of where he comes from and stands for it. >> a.j., the other thing to me -- >> well, josh -- >> please. >> let me jump in a second. i have to reject that notion that trump kind of changes with the fashions. really on that stage you had true flip-floppers. ted cruz is a flip-flopper. marco rubio -- >> wait a second. say whatever the heck you want about trump. and there's a lot of things to be said about him. i find many of his positions in
this campaign -- >> many great things. >> -- truly odious. but the guy has been all over the place. he said hillary clinton was great. he said -- >> how many years ago? >> he said jeb bush would make a great president. he said he was pro choice. >> he was. anybody on that stage would say that jeb bush would make a great president. he would. and hillary clinton you could say she's an accomplished woman. that doesn't mean you want her to be president in 2016. and yes, he was pro choice -- >> but here's the thing. >> -- 17 years ago. who cares? it was 17 years ago. >> but the whole thing is a con. the moment he were to win this nomination, i mean, he is going to run to whatever he thinks is going to be the position -- >> why would he be pulling a con? why? he doesn't need this. he's a billionaire with a great family, a great life. he doesn't need -- >> he wants to be president of the united states. >> and he wants to be the most powerful person in the world. >> donald trump said we should have a 45% tariff on chinesed goods and then he said he didn't say we should have a 45% tariff on chinese goods and someone made that up and the "new york times" quoted him. and then we released audio of
it. i mean, day to day he will change his mind. >> he literally said that he never said that and there -- >> and then didn't. everybody on that stage flip-flops. and you and i would too if what we say has been dissected and every day everything we say is dissected. it happens. everybody on that stage. politicians do. hillary does. everybody does. >> look, i think everyone changes their mind. and i do think people are all over the place. i just think that the current persona -- the persona that donald trump -- this is actually one of the questions here. the persona that donald trump has managed to channel since his birther phase in which he was obsessed with the discredited conspiracy theory about the birthplace of the president of the united states and spent a lot of money and time and the nation's energy on it, that the persona that he has channeled since that is kind of this like channeling of the steve king wing of the party. right? and the question is it's been very effective. it's been a disaster for the republican party in certain ways. but that is what the party is now. >> yeah. well, and it's also -- it's
reflecting this division between else in the party and the base. >> exploited it. >> right. donald trump is running this outsider campaign but it is not a uniformly conservative campaign. he has far right positions on things like immigration but on entitlements he says i won't touch social security or medicare or medicaid because i'll make us so rich we won't have to. he's identified the things that people in the republican base care about that haven't been served. and he's also identified the things that elites want that are unpopular and he's thrown overboard. >> and there is no -- there is no coming back. after you watch that debate the one thing i don't think anyone from any political persuasion can come back and be like, well, there's going to be some energy really flowing into rubio and kasich and jeb and christie. i mean, i just don't see where that -- >> god, no. >> a.j. delgado, josh barro, thank you both. >> thank you. >> thank you. still ahead, how hillary clinton found herself agreeing with donald trump at least about one thing. plus ted cruz has a case of the birthers. but how much damage can they really do? and later clinton and sanders continue to battle over health care. representatives from each campaign will join me. those stories and more ahead.
i'm on the move all day long... and sometimes, i just don't eat the way i should. so i drink boost® to get the nutrition that i'm missing. boost complete nutritional drink has 26 essential vitamins and minerals, including calcium and vitamin d to support strong bones and 10 grams of protein to help maintain muscle. all with a great taste. i don't plan on slowing down any time soon. stay strong. stay active with boost®. for your heart health, you think you're doing all you can ...but 9 out of 10 americans... ...aren't getting enough important omega-3s. bayer pro ultra omega-3 can help, with two times the concentration of omega-3s than the leading brand. love your heart ... with bayer pro ultra omega-3. i'm a customer relationship i'm roy gmanager.ith pg&e. anderson valley brewing company is definitely a leader in the adoption of energy efficiency.
pg&e is a strong supporter of solar energy. we focus on helping our customers understand it and be able to apply it in the best way possible. not only is it good for the environment, it's good for the businesses' bottom line. these are our neighbors. these are the people that we work with. that matters to me. i have three children that are going to grow up here and i want them to be able to enjoy all the things that i was able to enjoy. together, we're building a better california.
diminished to a point where tin pot dictators like the mullahs in iran are taking our navy ships. >> there's a great deal of consternation shown in last night's debate over the incident in which two u.s. navy boats were detained by iran for 16 hours. and here's what we're learning today about what might have started this incident and how it possibly could have grown far worse. this is according to the "l.a. times" citing u.s. officials. navy speed boats were off course in the persian gulf, possibly taking a shortcut through iranian waters. when iranian naval vessels approached the ten u.s. sailors aboard the two 50-foot-long riverine boats tried to make a run for it. the situation only became more complicate when'd a u.s. aircraft carrier task force led by the harry s. truman on patrol in the gulf quickly launched search helicopters into iranian air space. that served to further alarm tehr
tehran. so while iran's decision to videotape and broadcast the soldiers with their hands on their head for propaganda purposes is gross and possibly a violation of international law, if this reporting holds up it is very hard to call this an iranian provocation. severe ulcerative colitis, the possibility of a flare was almost always on my mind. thinking about what to avoid, where to go... and how to deal with my uc. to me, that was normal. until i talked to my doctor. she told me that humira helps people like me get uc under control and keep it under control when certain medications haven't worked well enough. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores.
don't start humira if you have an infection. raise your expectations. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, control is possible. senator cruz, you've suggested mr. trump embodies new york values. could you explain what you mean by that? >> i think most people know exactly what new york values are. >> i am from new york. i don't. >> you're from new york. so you might not. but i promise you in the state of south carolina they do.
>> senator ted cruz was at the ready last night when asked to explain what he means when he says that donald trump embodies new york values. defending the apparently poll-tested line he used to attack trump. >> you know, the concept of new york values is not that complicated to figure out. not too many years ago donald did a long interview with tim russert. and in that interview he explained his views on a whole host of issues that were very, very different from the views he's describing now. and in his explanation he said look, i'm from new york. that's what we believe in new york. those aren't iowa values but this is what we believe in new york. so that was his explanation. >> donald trump also came prepared, delivering a response that even had ted cruz applauding. >> when the world trade center came down, i saw something that no place on earth could have handled more beautifully, more humanely than work. you had two 100 --
[ applause ] you had two 110-story buildings come crashing down. i saw them come down. and the people in new york fought and fought and fought, and we saw more death and even the smell of death, and we rebuilt downtown manhattan. and everybody in the world watched and everybody in the world loved new york and loved new yorkers. and i have to tell you, that was a very insulting statement that ted made. >> it's fair to say t"the new york daily news" also found cruz's statement insulting. before we show you their front page from today i guess i have to warn you that some viewers may find it offensive. it reads "drop dead ted" with a picture of the statue of liberty giving the middle finger and the subtitle "hey, cruz, you don't like new york values, go back to canada." cruz's comments also led to an unlikely showing of support for donald trump. democratic front-runner, former new york senator hillary clinton tweeted "just this once trump's
right." mayor of new york bill de blasio tweeted he agrees with trump on this issue and asked think ted cruz criticized new york values when he asked goldman for massive loans or he comes here to gobble up cash? today cruz was asked by nbc if he wanted to apologize for comments on new york values to which he gave this response. >> apologize. to all of the african-american children who mayor de blasio tried to throw out of their charter schools that were providing a lifeline to the american dream. and i apologize to all the cops and the firefighters and 9/11 heroes who had no choice but to stand and turn their backs on mayor de blasio because mayor de blasio over and over again stands with the looters and criminals rather than the brave men and women of blue. >> joining me now, ed cox, chairman of the new york republican state committee. mr. cox, what's your response --
>> good evening, chris. >> what's your response to ted cruz's apparent doubling down this evening? >> well, look, there's a back and forth going here, and that's part of politics. i went to school in new york and i've worked in new york as a corporate and financial lawyer for my entire career. and it is indeed the greatest city in the world. look, you talk about the values in new york city, they're the values of america. life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. but in new york city they're carried to a different degree. a different degree of sophisticated energy that's unmatched by any city in the world. that's why pope john paul ii called new york city the capital of the world. >> but with due respect, mr. cox, you were there. am i mistakeen? you were there in that debate last night. >> i sure was. >> so you know there's an appetite for this. people in your party, south carolina, they dent like new york. they think it is -- i don't know what they think it is. but they think it doesn't share
their values. >> a lot of them came from new york down to south carolina. >> that's true. there are a lot of ex-pats. >> my driver had a great time. he came from queens, new york. 55 million tourists, mostly from the united states but also around -- from around the world come to new york because from the statue of liberty to sylvia's up in harlem, from st. patrick's to prometheus unbound on the other side of the street, new york city is a fascinating energy-driven city, and it's always been that way ever since it was new amsterdam at its very start. >> so do you think it's insulting to go -- to essentially make political hay by just attacking a somewhat random -- it's very weird. now ted cruz is apparently now condemning andrew cuomo and bill de blasio, who he's not running against, which you know, do whatever you want in that. but there's something a little weird about making political hay out of just insulting one part
of theagree. when you have andrew cuomo say conservatives should leave new york, have no place in new york, i'd have to agree with that that that's something you certainly should condemn. and the way mayor de blasio, the way he's undoing every good conservative policy that was put in place and that brought new york city back from being new york city of prime and grime in the late '80s as mayor giuliani did and mayor bloomberg did with respect to schools and charter schools. and mayor de blasio's undoing every one of those. and i think it's right to condemn him for that. >> what is he undoing? >> he undid the welfare reforms. his administration's taking workfare out of welfare and you see the welfare rules going up again. with respect -- >> can i insert something? just because you mentioned the charter school. i just want to be clear on the facts here and because ted cruz said. the mayor proposed that charter schools, which are currently using physical buildings of the
new york public school system for free, actually pay fair market rent for those spaces. so that was the actual substantive proposal there. he wasn't throwing them out. he wasn't shutting them down. he was asking them to contribute to the overhead of those buildings, just so people know what policy he's referring to. ed cox. >> chris. >> yes. >> chris, for ten years i authorized half the charter schools in new york city as chairman of the charter school institute of the state university of new york. the law provides that the city of new york and other cities have to make access to public school space and other space that they might have available to charter schools. and that's the simple fact. >> ed cox, thanks so much. >> my pleasure. >> coming up, i need you to do something. take a look at this tape. remember it. because everything is not as it appears. "all in" on your side, next. if you're taking multiple medications, does your mouth often feel dry? a dry mouth can be a side effect of many medications. but it can also lead to tooth decay and bad breath. that's why there's biotene,
available as an oral rinse, toothpaste, spray or gel. biotene can provide soothing relief and it helps keep your mouth healthy too. remember, while your medication is doing you good, a dry mouth isn't. biotene, for people who suffer from a dry mouth. i tabut with my back paines, i couldn't sleep and get up in time. then i found aleve pm. aleve pm is the only one to combine a safe sleep aid plus the 12 hour pain relieving strength of aleve. i'm back. aleve pm for a better am.
more of the old lady. i'd like to see her go back to her more you know social side. (vo) pro plan bright mind promotes alertness and mental sharpness in dogs 7 and older. (ray) it was shocking. she's much more aware. (jan) she loves the food. (ray) she wants to learn things. the difference has been incredible. (vo) purina pro plan bright mind. nutrition that performs.
i was the beaver in "leave it to beaver." a few years later, i was a type 2 diabetic. but i'm not anymore. diabetes causes neuropathy, blindness, and amputation. at its worst, it can kill you. today i want you to have a look at an amazing breakthrough that has stopped diabetes in its tracks for over 200,000 people just like you and me. now you can do the same thing, because it's all spelled out in a very special system called the diabetes solution kit. i urge you to try this all-natural, done-for-you program so you can finally live independent of drugs and insulin shots. i'm jerry mathers, and if i can do it, you can do it, too.
i think it was terrible. in every way. >> there are so many elderlies here. why did they have to pick him? >> you thought it was in poor taste? >> in very poor taste. >> at this hour a scandal is rocking the city of cranston, rhode island. it all started last week at the local senior center. where a press conference was held to roll out a new snow angels program. cranston teens are being called upon to help shovel the driveways of home-bound senior citizens. some of those teens were brought in for the press conference. so was the snow. hauled in from the local ice rink. and as for the senior citizens, well, one of them was on hand and she stood right next to the
organizer of the news conference and head of the senior enrichment center, sue stenhouse. >> this is one of my most favorite projects. and it's because it's intergenerational. and it's about great youth coming together and helping out our neighbors. >> but some digging by the i-team at wjar in providence revealed that the elderly woman standing next to miss stenhouse at the press conference just mere steps away from cranston mayor alan fung wasn't exactly who she was purporting to be. >> it was a she that now turns out was really a he. nbc 10 has learned a bus driver was dressed up as an elderly woman for this press conference we covered last week at the cranston senior center. >> a man named david roberts drives a van that transports senior citizens around cranston. as wjar discovered, a decision was made to have roberts pose as
an elderly woman at the press conference by wearing that get-up. roberts donned a dress, earrings, lipstick, and a wig. a name tag roberts wore that read "cranston senior home resident. mr. roberts could not be reached for comment by wjar, but according to local reports miss tenhouse the organizer of the news conference did not have a senior citizen present at the event so she asked roberts to step in. she has since resigned from her position as director of the city's senior services. and while the mayor's office isn't commenting on the matter, the owner of the hair salon where mr. roberts allegedly obtained his wig had plenty to say. >> dave usually drives the senior citizens in to the salon. so he said to me, lane, do you have a wig that i could borrow? he said i have to get dressed as a senior. >> you saw the story. >> so i saw the story. >> and what did you think? >> and i went, oh, my god, i can't believe that, you know, he
wanted it for that. i probably would have given him a better wig. the medical bills - the credit card debt all piled up. i knew i had to get serious my credit. so i signed up for experian. they have real, live credit experts i can talk to. they helped educate me on how debt affected my fico score. so i could finally start managing my credit. now my credit and i - are both healing nicely. get serious about your credit. get experian. go to experian.com and start your credit tracker trial membership today. frequent heartburn brand in america. i hope you like it spicy! get complete protection with the purple pill. the new leader in frequent heartburn. that's nexium level protection. doh no, i'll take you up to me othe front of the school. that's where your friends are. seriously, it's, it's really fine. you don't want to be seen with your dad? no, it's..no.. this about a boy? dad! stop, please. o, there's tracy. [ horn honks ] what!
[ beeps, tires screech ] bye dad! it brakes when you don't. forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking. available on the newly redesigned passat. from volkswagen. this just got interesting. why pause to take a pill? or stop to find a bathroom? cialis for daily use is approved to treat both erectile dysfunction and the urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas for pulmonary hypertension, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis and a $200 savings card stop taking cialis and get medical help right away.
when you have a lot of followers, you should take them somewhere. they want to see the world through your eyes or your stomach. so show them the waterfalls, the duck boats, the sheep and sweaters made from sheep all i need is one card and a witty instagram caption. for rewards...for the services and protections of membership... for the journey... carry the american express premier rewards gold card. this is lloyd. to prove to you that the better choice for him is aleve. he's agreed to give it up. ok, but i have 30 acres to cover by sundown. we'll be with him all day as he goes back to taking tylenol. yeah, i was ok, but after lunch my knee started hurting again so... more pills. yep... another pill stop. can i get my aleve back yet? for my pain... i want my aleve. get all day minor arthritis pain relief with an easy open cap.
everyone went into last night's gop presidential debate wondering how texas senator ted cruz would parry the so-called birther question, the notion raised repeatedly by donald trump that cruz, who was born in canada to an american mother, is not a so-called natural-born citizen and thus is constitutionally ineligible to be president. >> the facts and the law here are really quite clear. under long-standing u.s. law the child of a u.s. citizen born abroad is a natural-born citizen. the chances of any litigation proceeding and succeeding on this are zero. >> this is ted cruz's argument. the law's settled, it'm a natural-born citizen, case closed. cruz's argument got pretty high marks from commentators. but the problem for cruz is the issue is simply not going to go away. john mccain, rand paul, iowa
governor terry branstad are among the elected republican officials who have joined trump in questioning cruz's eligibility. a number of prominent legal scholars say the law is not clear. plus, as buzzfeed reports, cruz has now inherited president obama's birther true believers, including orly taitz who filed multiple lawsuits seeking to get president obama removed from office and who was once fined $20,000 by a judge who said taitz "abuse her privilege to practice law." >> obama is completely illegitimate for u.s. presidency for two reasons. not only because he did not provide the place of his birth but also because both parents have to be u.s. citizens. his father was never u.s. citizen. >> yesterday an 85-year-old houston lawyer reportedly filed the first lawsuit over cruz's eligibility and as tp me. points out it's a doozy. a rambling 28-page complaint that seemingly brings all sorts of issues into the case.
it is not clear who has standing to bring a suit against cruz but there's no doubt cruz is poised to face more legal challenges including from democratic congressman alan grayson, who said on this show last night plans to file suit if cruz is the nominee. >> i guess it's america, right? so at some level what trump is saying is true, which is that anything like this is going to be litigated by someone, i imagine. >> yes. that's exactly what makes america so great. anybody can sue anybody for anything. >> joining me now, charlie pierce, writer at large for "esquire." charlie, my evolution on this is i still think on the merits this is ridiculous. i do think the president is pretty clear, although the court hasn't ruled on it. but i have now become convinced that if he's a nominee someone's going to sue and not just some cooke, you know, who's filing some nutty pro se claim but some lawyer something, really good lawyer somewhere is going to actually put this before a court. >> i mean, i think you've got -- first of all, you've got to warn
me when there's an orly taitz sound bite coming up. i think someone should -- someone just drove a railroad spike into my right ear. but i any you're seeing a couple of things going on here. number one, the republican establishment may not be sure donald trump can win the election, but the republican establishment really doesn't like ted cruz. you've got terry branstad, who is probably the blandest of bland midwest republicans, saying, well, geez, i'm not really sure. and the other thing is this is one of those things. if you accept that the members of the constitutional convention 23 in the 1780s were the intellectual creme de la creme of their time this is one of those things that makes me think they're just messing with the rest of us. to leave this as ambiguous as they did. this is almost as funny a piece of comedy gold as the electoral college. >> well, and here's the thing. when i listen to that orly taitz
bite, it reminded me -- i mean, again, the whole birther thing was so preposterous because the facts of it were untrue. the president was born in the united states, ergo he's a citizen under the 14th amendment. but the theory of the case i had forgotten. right? the theory of the obama birther case was that he was born secretly in kenya and the fact that he wasn't a citizen automatically because his mother was one. so actually, they were making a version of the argument with the wrong facts that people are now making against ted cruz with the correct facts. >> well, yeah. the correct fact being that ted cruz actually was born in canada. but i -- this is fascinating to me. the idea that this story has had legs beyond a day or two. because i'm convinced trump just threw it out there because that's the way he does things. >> right. >> but the idea that -- we have lawrence tribe chipping in and the woman whose name unfortunately i can't remember who wrote the piece in "usa today," that there's actual
constitutional ambiguity on who can run for president and what the citizenship qualifications are. this to me is a fascinating sidelight to this campaign. >> and it will be something -- it's going to be something that is going to show up in court in a lot of places. and the delicious irony here, talking to some legal experts about who would have standing to sue, the best person to have standing to sue would be someone that lost the nomination to ted cruz. and if ted cruz were to win the nominati nomination, i can name someone who is pretty good with lawsuits and would have standing. and donald trump suing ted cruz to kick him out would be quite a spectacle. >> and is there any doubt in anybody's mind that he would do that? >> zero doubt. >> usually, you'd say, you know, a guy wants a future in politics -- >> exactly. >> -- he doesn't want to rock the boat. donald trump simply does not care about that. now, i'm not saying he will. but he's the most likely of all. >> charlie pierce, thank you very much. still to come, going into this weekend's democratic debate the race has gotten a lot closer and the two leading candidates are no longer holding back. stay with us. ou get,
alka seltzer plus liquid gels rush liquid fast relief to your tough cold symptoms. and they outsell mucinex liquid gels 2 to 1. alka seltzer plus liquid gels. iall across the state belthe economy is growing,day. with creative new business incentives, and the lowest taxes in decades, attracting the talent and companies of tomorrow. like in the hudson valley, with world class biotech. and on long island, where great universities are creating next generation technologies. let us help grow your company's tomorrow, today at business.ny.gov at ally bank no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like reunions equal blatant lying. the company is actually doing really well on, on social media. oh that's interesting. i - i started social media. oh! it was my...baby.
today we saw the latest example of president obama attempting to define his legacy in his last year. a huge announcement, one that flew under the radar and one that climate activists have been lobbying for. halting new coal mining leases on public lands. at first blush that might not sound like much. you don't think of anecdotes of running into coal miners at yosemite national park. but actually, according to the "times," about 40% of this country's coal is mined on public land. primarily in wyoming. this order only pertains to new leases. this action comes as the administration seeks to overhaul the entire federal coal program. it's an issue the president did not shy away from in his state of the union speech. the follow-up in a way to last year's action to limit carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. i'm anxious to see what else
this final year of his administration brings on our most pressing global crisis. hey pal? you ready? can you pick me up at 6:30? ah... (boy) i'm here! i'm here! (cop) too late. i was gone for five minutes! ugh! move it. you're killing me. you know what, dad? i'm good. (dad) it may be quite a while before he's ready, but our subaru legacy will be waiting for him. (vo) the longest-lasting midsize sedan in its class. the twenty-sixteen subaru legacy. it's not just a sedan. it's a subaru. i tabut with my back paines, i couldn't sleep and get up in time. then i found aleve pm. aleve pm is the only one to combine a safe sleep aid plus the 12 hour pain relieving strength of aleve. i'm back. aleve pm for a better am.
this sunday hillary clinton will share a debate stage with rival bernie sanders after a contentious week in which her campaign hammered sanders on health care. >> i'm a little surprised to be having this debate, and it's really a very general debate when it comes to senator sanders, about no, we need to have a single payer system. well, what does that mean? now, the only clue that i can find, because he hasn't laid out a plan, is to go back and look at the bills that he's introduced nine different times. and it's a bit concerning to me because it would basically end all the kinds of health care we know. medicare, medicaid, the chip program, children's health insurance, tricare for the national guard, military, affordable care act, exchange policies, employer-based policies. it would take all that and hand it over to the states. >> that was clinton last night speaking with our own rachel ma dourks going after the senator from vermont repeatedly for not yet releasing the details of his
single payer health care policy. as polls in iowa have ticened the latest showing clinton up by just two points, well within the margin of error, clinton campaign has sought to portray sanders' plan, as what he callscare for all as expensive, unrealistic, and possibly imperilling the health care of millions of people. joining me to defend that position, press secretary for the clinton campaign. how are you, brian? >> hi, chris. >> thank you for being here. ? thanks for having me. >> let's talk price tag. i understand your beef with the campaign, that the sanders campaign has not put out a specific plan. >> that's right. >> so the "wall street journal" writes this article. >> yes. >> where they use an estimate from an economist at u.s. amherst saying 15 trillion. that's over ten years. but the economist himself wrote an open letter saying that misses the fact that there would be $5 trillion in savings squeezed out of the health care
system, right? >> sure. >> so you've been using this $15 trillion number. is that a legitimate number to be using? >> sure. that's how cbo would score it. there's a couple points here. the first is a point just about transparency. if you're a candidate running for president and one of your main proposalsize a single payer plan that could cost potentially as much as $15 trillion, putting aside how much it may actually save, but if it's going to cost $15 trillion i think you owe it to the electorate whose votes you're seeking to put the details out. and he said he would and then waffled on that. so just from a pure process matter of running for president and doing right by the folks whose votes you're seeking i think it makes sense to put the details out so we can assess the details of the plan. but secondly on the substance of the matter, the details matter because senator sanders may well want to argue after he puts the details out of his plan that notwithstanding the tax increase athat middle-class households could potentially face or did face at least under that analysis of hr-676. >> we should be clear about that bill, that john conyers bill in the house, it is not bernie
sanders' bill. >> that's right. similar enough -- >> a medicare for all bill. >> that's right. an analysis that was conducted of that very similar proposal. middle-class households' taxes would rise. >> and senator sanders -- >> you could very well argue that their premiums -- >> that's right. >> -- are going to be reduced. and the reduction in those premiums will eclipse the tax increase. >> that is the argument. >> put the details out and we'll see if that's true because what we would conclude potentially once we see the details but we haven't seen -- what we're ready to potentially contend is while a lot of those middle-class households may do better in a pre-aca world it may be the case that post-aca it's a bad bargain for a lot of -- >> so this gets to a deeper question about this idea of taking away from health care or dismantling existing health care, right? chelsea clinton i think used the word dismantle when she was talking about chip and these other things. i remember -- hillary clinton when she worked on president bill clinton's health care
plarngs right? she was harry and louise. the infamous ads withar they came out and said they're going to take away our health care. and when barack o'bam tried to do that to her, she zboupt said in a famous moment, shame on you, barack obama, since when do democrats do that -- how is this not harry and louising bernie sanders? >> because she went through those bats, the so-called hillary care saga in 1993, paws she campaigned on a universal health care plan in 2008 that included, by the way, a very strong public option that would have increased the amount of people that would have been covered by a government plan, quote unquote -- >> does she support that now? >> sure. public option, sure. look, as an aside, the difference between democrats and republicans on this issue is vast. the difference here is meaningful but put it in perspective. >> right. >> so she absolutely is not against the principle of expanding the number of people that acovered by government insurance. that's what the public option would do. but i think it's because she went through the crucible of
those experiences she realized the aca is no small thing. so it's one small thing to put oout out a white paper and suggest single payer may be a good idea but if you're running for president and you're actually going to propose to get certain things done with a potentially republican congress you ought to put out the details and admit to people whose votes you're seeking how practical it really is. so to the point about whether the taxes and the premium savings would actually add up, there are all kinds of people, people under age 26 who right now are getting insurance through their parents. >> right. >> they would not benefit that 345rkdly -- >> the point is -- >> but the tax increases would be -- >> the point is -- >> folks that are on expanded medicaid thanks to the aca would not benefit that markedly from the move to single payer but they would be hit by the tax increase. folks that are being subsidized almost fully on the exchanges won benefit that much from a switch to single payer but they would get the 9% tax increase. so let's have that discussion. but we can't have it until senator sanders puts out the detail. >> as the final point let me just say the form of that argument is the form that conservatives use to argue against all progressive health
care. right? because someone's going -- >> aca is progressive health care. >> i know that -- >> because hillary clinton is standing with president obama to say the aca was no small feat. that's a pretty progressive argument, actually. >> brian fallon, thank you so much. bernie sanders' campaign manager joins me next to respond. please stay with us. caring for someone with alzheimer's means i am a lot of things. i am his sunshine. i am his advocate. so i asked about adding once-daily namenda xr to his current treatment for moderate to severe alzheimer's. it works differently. when added to another alzheimer's treatment, it may improve overall function and cognition. and may slow the worsening of symptoms for a while. vo: namenda xr doesn't change how the disease progresses.
it shouldn't be taken by anyone allergic to memantine, or who's had a bad reaction to namenda xr or its ingredients. before starting treatment, tell their doctor if they have, or ever had, a seizure disorder, difficulty passing urine, liver, kidney or bladder problems, and about medications they're taking. certain medications, changes in diet, or medical conditions may affect the amount of namenda xr in the body and may increase side effects. the most common side effects are headache, diarrhea, and dizziness. he's always been my everything. now i am giving back. ask their doctor about once-daily namenda xr and learn about a free trial offer at namendaxr.com. ...one of many pieces in my life. so when my asthma symptoms kept coming back on my long-term control medicine, i talked to my doctor and found a missing piece in my asthma treatment. once-daily breo prevents asthma symptoms.
breo is for adults with asthma not well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. breo won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. breo opens up airways to help improve breathing for a full 24 hours. breo contains a type of medicine that increases the risk of death from asthma problems and may increase the risk of hospitalization in children and adolescents. breo is not for people whose asthma is well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. once your asthma is well controlled, your doctor will decide if you can stop breo and prescribe a different asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. do not take breo more than prescribed. see your doctor if your asthma does not improve or gets worse. ask your doctor if 24-hour breo could be a missing piece for you. see if you're eligible for 12 months free at mybreo.com.
full of guests on the waye and a cold with sinus pressure, you need fast relief. alka-seltzer plus severe sinus congestion and cough liquid gels rush relief to your tough symptoms. to put you back in control. [doorbell] woman: coming! alka-seltzer plus sinus. joining me now, jeff weaver, campaign manager for bernie sanders. and jeff, let me start with this question of details. it really does seem to me entirely fair to say look, how the math of this works out, who benefits, who loses under this plan is going to matter on the details and we can't argue with a thing we haven't seen. >> well, that's right.
but look, senator sanders said he would put out his proposal by the time of the iowa caucuses. that's february 1st. if you look at your alexander today, it is not february 1st yet. so why this process argument about the plan isn't out before the date you that said you would put it out when that date hasn't gotten here yet. >> sow guys are going to put it out. >> of course we're putting it out, yes. the real issue here is is the democratic party going to stand for universal health care or not? the ac wachlt as a tremendous accomplishment. there's no doubt. senator sanders supported it. he was on the committee to help write it. it was a huge step forward. but it is true there are still millions of people who are not covered by health insurance. many people have high co-payments and deductibles. the democratic party since franklin delano roosevelt has stood for universal health care. and senator sanders is advocating for universal health care for every american as a right. secretary clinton apparently no longer supports that. you know what happened in 2008 when she rather viciously
attacked senator obama saying that attacking another democrat on the issue of supporting universal health care undermined core democratic values. those are her words. and gave aid and comfort to the very special interests and their allies in the republican party, also her words, who want to defeat universal health care. >> so what about this? the argument that if you go back and open up health care-u opening a pandora's box. particularly if you had a republican senate in congress and president bernie sanders comes to a republican senate in congress and says let's do a health care bill that the net effect of that would be net destructive. that doesn't strike me as a crazy argument. >> well, it is crazy and it's crazy for this reason. senator sanders has been a strong advocate for universal health care for years and expanding health care to people who don't have it. do you think for a second he is going to put in danger existing health care programs if there's no confidence that he's going to get to move forward on a single payer plan? as he has said this isn't going to happen overnight. this is the vision.
it has been the vision of the democratic party. secretary clinton apparently is abandoning that vision, which has been a vision of the great leaders of this party for decades. senator sanders is carrying on the legacy of fdr, of truman, of lbj, who all have pushed to expand health care to people who don't have it. believe me, bernie sanders is a strong supporter of people having health care and he's not going to do anything tone danger the health care people already have and it's really a disingenuous attack on their part to suggest he's going to dismantle all these programs when in fact what he's trying to do is expand health care to all americans as a right. >> last night senator clinton, quickly, she said -- talking about democrats taking money from wall street and then telling them what to do also included barack obama, who took a lot of money from the finance industry. is that fair? >> no, it's not fair. look, this election is between bernie sanders and secretary clinton and barack obama, last night was not running for president. we've seen barack obama in office.
barack obama has been a great president. it's not a surprise secretary clinton is trying to cozy up to the president as much as humanly possible. but we all know that the truth of the matter is if secretary clinton had her way that n. 2008 there would not have been any president barack obama. >> but it is true that senator barack obama -- the substantive point is senator barack obama did take a lot of money from finance and did pass a wall street regulatory bill. >> well, it was very different in 2008 than it is in 2016 and the ability to raise money. now, obviously the president raised a lot of money online. that's for sure. but the technology now is far superior in terms of being able to raise money online. bernie sanders' message is reaching out to people across this country. he's being funded with a grassroots campaign. it is not entirely clear that that magnitude of fund-raising could have been accomplished in 2008. >> all right. jeff weaver, thanks a lot for joining me tonight. really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> that is "all in" for this evening. "the rachel maddow show" starts right now. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, chris. have an excellent weekend, my friend. >> you too. >> and