tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC October 29, 2016 3:00am-4:01am PDT
ke owhatever comes nex find out how american express cards and services can help prere you for growth at open.com. the last speaker of the house who left congress under pressure from the hard-liner wing from his own party, a man named john boehner, boehner is spelled b-o-e-h-n-e-r. now, everybody gets to pronounce their own name the way they want to pronounce it. and if john boehner says his last name is pronounced boehner, then it is pronounced boehner. the word, however, does not look like it would be pronounced boehner. and before he was super famous, speaker of the house, even his own republican colleagues sometimes would screw up and say his name the way it looks rather
than the way it is supposed to be said. >> the gentleman from florida is recognized. >> i yield two minutes to the gentleman from ohio, mr. boner. >> the gentleman from ohio is recognized for two minutes. without objection. >> mr. speaker, today by our votes and words, we will send a message -- >> the gentleman from ohio, mr. boner. and boehner gives this long pause at the beginning -- in my mind, he's standing there thinking, should i correct this guy, tell him that's not how you say my name. he doesn't correct the guy. he moves on. i don't think john boehner has been particularly oversensitive to people getting his last name right or wrong. because he hasn't made a big deal about it, over time it became a mark of immaturity, a mark of childishness for anyone to deliberately say his name wrong or to tease him about what
his last name looks like. once john boehner was speaker of the house, i think the only person who ever effectively teased him about his last name was the only other member of congress who actually had standing to tease john boehner about his last name, and he had that standing because of his own last name. >> it is true, it's difficult having this name. i admit it, it is something that caused me a lot of ridicule and hardship. it is simply in my neighborhood not easy to be named anthony. [ laughter ] but in fairness, i did hear the last original weiner joke in like the fifth grade. so now i embrace it. i freely embrace it. by the way, i do the weiner jokes around here, guys. really, who is boehner fooling? what am i, like anthony woehner? i'm serious, brother, just embrace it.
[ laughter ] >> that clip is proof of two things. number one, there's a one in three shot of any archived clip you need to look up for any reason inexplicably having andrea mitchell in it. at any time whatever the subject is, you're going to find andrea mitchell. i didn't expect that at the congressional correspondents dinner in 2011. that clip also proves that only a guy named anthony weiner can really go there in terms of making fun of a guy whose last name looks like boner but he wants you to pronounce it boehner. and looking back on that, that was five years ago. that was the spring of 2011. that is still funny. but hearing anthony weiner tell lots of weiner jokes, it's now got kind of a different vibe to it, given what we have learned about him since then. once upon a time anthony weiner was basically unavoidable for
comment. he was this pugnacious, fast-talking partisan. he was a great fighter as a democratic partisan. he was a great fighter as an advocate for new york. in congress he gave floor speeches that were absolutely designed to be clipped and shared. he made news with his floor speeches. he would come home and make more news on tv news. he loved to be on tv news shows. on top of that, he was connected. he was married to hillary clinton's top aide, huma abedin. anthony weiner won seven terms in the house. his visibility was rising on a meteoric arc and then, boom, it all got super creepy super fast with what initially seemed like a private matter, a personal matter if a somewhat strange one. >> congressman anthony weiner may have just been another political victim of the pitfalls of social media. washington is buzzing about
whether or not he sent a lewd photograph to a young woman knowingly. the normally blunt weiner was shied away from even the most basic of questions. this is the picture sent to a 21-year-old female college student in seattle from anthony weiner's twitter account. an anonymous man wearing briefs. the congressman says his account was hacked and he is the victim of a prank. >> may, 2011, is when the first report surfaced of congressman anthony weiner basically having the online equivalent of phone sex with women who he met through twitter and over social media. when those initial reports surfaced, anthony weiner in his typical pugnacious style denied all of it, including here on this show. he was a guest on this show during this scandal. he looked me in the eye and he told me that his account had been hacked and none of this was true. he was lying to me. within two weeks, june 2011, he
had admitted that actually, yeah, that stuff was him. he had apologized for his denials and he resigned his seat in congress. ultimately they held a special election to fill that seat and it went to a republican. then two years later in the spring of 2013, anthony weiner decided that he had been in the penalty box long enough, by his own estimation. he decided people were ready to have him back, he was sure of it. he jumped back into politics to run to be mayor of new york city. he jumped into that race in april, april 2013. by july 2013, oh, wait, there's more. more explicit pictures of him emerged, seeming to indicate that he had not stopped cheating on his wife with random strangers who he met online. he still did not drop out of the race, though. when new york democrats held their primary for the mayor's race in september of that year, september 2013, he got 4 point
something percent of the vote and that was it. that was three years ago when he was still running for mayor. but as of this summer, this thing with him was apparently still going on. in august, more new pictures and new sexually explicit messages were reported and linked to congressman weiner and these ones took a darker, creepier, more unsettling turn of the one of the images and one of the streams of messages showed the former congressman with his young son next to him in bed while he was communicating apparently with a young woman online. it was also reported that some of his explit sexual messaging was with a girl in north carolina, and i say girl because reportedly she told him that she was 15 years old. at that point when this round of allegations and stories emerged this summer, anthony weiner's wife, huma abedin, hillary clinton's top aide, she announced that she and her husband were separating. it's also at that point that the new york police department and the fbi reportedly started
looking into this as a potential criminal matter, not just as a gross, sad, personal matter that ended a political career and a marriage. but that is the path that brought us to today's bombshell political news 11 days before the presidential election, because the cops and the fbi looking into anthony weiner's online sexual behavior to see if he behaved criminally apparently that resulted in the fbi coming into possession, we're not sure exactly how, coming into possession of what is described by one source as a laptop computer that was used by both anthony weiner and his wife, huma abedin. and that, according to nbc news sources is what led to this letter today from fbi director james comey. it says the fbi discovered new information that may be pertinent to its previous investigation of hillary clinton's use of a private e-mail serve if when she was secretary of state. it says the fbi is reviewing these e-mails that they have
come across in this totally unrelated investigation. they are reviewing them to determine whether they contain classified information as well as to assess their importance to our investigation. so basically this letter says i'm just writing to let you know that we're doing that. the fbi cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant. so the material in terms of hillary clinton and this previous investigation and everything may be totally insignificant as far as that investigation is concerned. this stuff may mean nothing. this may be totally valueless. it may not even be connected. but the fbi is looking at it and so they have written this letter to the chairs of eight congressional committees to let them know they're looking at something that really might be nothing. we don't know. but sending a letter like this 11 days before a presidential election, a letter with no actual information in it, with no actual allegation in it, with
not even a description of what might be potentially wrong here, giving people no information on which to judge for themselves the significance of this information or whether it even reflects poorly on hillary clinton by proxy, giving people absolutely nothing, that is something the fbi had to know would land like a lightning bolt in a swimming hole. and of course it has. and so now everybody has got their hair on fire and this is a huge hullabaloo for hillary clinton's campaign as once again her political life has been turned upside down because of the sexual misconduct of someone who is not her. and, naturally, we're back to the boehner jokes. this is the cover of "the new york post" tomorrow. are you ready to cover your child's eyes? here it is, "new york post" tomorrow. the word in the upper left corner there in red. yes, that word is dickileaks.
first of all, this isn't wikileaks. and second of all, the rest of that part of the headline actually isn't true. the fbi didn't reopen the e-mail case. the case was technically never closed. they just say they're looking at other material in conjunction with that case and maybe it's nothing. but because of the origin of this material, the reported origin of this material which the fbi isn't even confirming, you also get the obligatory shirtless picture of anthony weiner and the headline "stroking gun." we'll have hillary clinton's response coming up in a couple of minutes. we also have the response from her running mate, tim kaine. we've also got legal analysis ahead from nbc's justice correspondent pete williams and ari melber. i should tell you pete williams has been johnny on the spot on this story from the very beginning, from the very first moments when it broke. so looking toward to hearing the latest developments from him tonight. but in political terms,
democrats and supporters of hillary clinton are reacting to today's news mostly with anger. specifically with anger and bewilderment at the fbi for how they handled this today and for this decision to send this remarkable, inflammatory, content-free letter. joining us now is democratic congressman elijah cummings of maryland. he's the ranking member on the committee of oversight and government reform, so he was one of the democrats to whom this letter from the fbi director was copied. congressman cummings, i know it was hard for you to get to us tonight. i really appreciate you making the time, sir. >> my pleasure. >> you have put out a statement tonight along with congressman conyers calling for the fbi to release more information. why are you calling for that? >> well, rachel, because director comey when he put out this statement, i'm sure he knew that the republicans would do what they always do.
they took this statement and you've adequately described it. it does not say what the e-mails are, doesn't tell me -- doesn't cover the length of time that they're talking about. we don't know whether these were e-mails from hillary clinton or miss abedin, we don't know. he should have known they would do what they always do. they would spin it to make it look as if it was more than what it was. there is no reopening of a case. it's -- the case has never been closed. and again -- but what we've seen, rachel, is that after director comey made his decision three months ago or so and said that no reasonable prosecutor would recommend charges in this
case, the republicans who before that time had applauded him as one of the most wonderful, most filled with integrity type people that they know, suddenly when they didn't get the decision they wanted, they then began to beat up on him. as i have said, they put him on trial. that is director comey and the fbi. and so they beat up on him and they had basically subpoenaed almost every single document, every single syllable that might have been brought up in this investigation. and that's -- by the way, that's very unusual. so i think what happened to director comey is that he knew that whatever he did, there was going to be a microscope placed on whatever came up. so he said, well, let me make sure that i make them aware of what is going on. it may not be anything here. and yet he had to notify them. as soon as they got the notice, they ran to the press and said, oh, the case is being reopened
and after they had then villified the commissioner, then they came back -- the director, then they came back and said trump and others are saying, oh, he's okay with us now. that's not how justice works. justice is a process. and you -- just because you don't get the result you want does not mean it's a bad thing. the fact is, is it's a process. you want it to be filled with integrity and fairness. i think basically what we have here is unfair to hillary clinton. and i'm asking the director right now that he should not let this weekend go by without providing clarification as to what this letter means, because i think that would be fair to mrs. clinton and fair to the american people. >> congressman, clearly you fault the republicans for the way they have responded to this letter today. do you fault the fbi? do you fault director comey for
the vagueness of this announcement? you obviously want him to add more to what he has said, to put out more information. do you fault him for releasing this letter without any information? >> rachel, i understand -- i think that commissioner -- basically what the commissioner did from the very beginning when he came out with this statement explaining why he was not recommending charges, at that point i knew it was all downhill. and so i'm not upset with him because after he did that, i even told him when he came before our committee several months ago, i said what is going to happen now, the republicans are going to never be satisfied. they're going to investigate you and they're going to investigate the fbi. and that's exactly what they're doing. so basically what i saw today was the director basically knowing that if he did not give them a heads up, they would say, oh, the day after the election,
oh, it was rigged or the process was rigged or that it was unfair or that he did something wrong and the next thing you know, they might be trying to impeach him like they're trying to impeach the irs commissioner. so i can kind of understand what happened, but once he opened that door, i think basically what he's doing is trying to make sure that when they put a microscope on this process, that he can say that i gave you a heads up and it was not rigged. >> congressman elijah cummings. >> but still, but still i'm hoping that he will provide this information before the weekend is out. >> congressman elijah cummings of maryland, sorry for the interruption there. thank you for making time for us tonight. >> my pleasure. >> i appreciate it. >> thank you. >> so congressman cummings is, as i said, the ranking member on the house oversight committee. he's the top democrat on that committee. this is a very pointed thing that he is calling for.
he and the top democrat on the judiciary committee, john conyers, are calling for the fbi director to make a statement before the weekend is out, adding to this letter, saying what it is that they mean. what is the content of this stuff rather than let everybody decide whatever is in these e-mails that they'd like to decide based on the absolute lack of information that's been provided by the fbi in this letter. don't let the weekend pass, he said. all right. still ahead tonight, there is more on this. we've also got some big dollar news from the campaign and some noncampaign news ahead. stay with us. ♪ using 6000 points from my chase ink cd i bought all the framework... wire... and plants need to gi my shop... a face. one will foet. sewhat theer opoints can do for your busiss learn re at chase.com/ink
here was hillary clinton's response today to this remarkable letter from the fbi announcing that it might be nothing, this might be nothing at all, we don't know if they have got anything significant whatsoever but we're reviewing more e-mails jusin case they're important but they might not be. but we want to tell everybody exactly that amount of information 11 days before the election. here was hillary clinton's
response to that today. good afternoon. i'd like to say a few words and then take your questions. i have now seen director comey's letter to congress. we are 11 days out from perhaps the most important national election of our lifetimes. voting is already under way in our country. so the american people deserve to get the full and complete facts immediately. the director himself has said he doesn't know whether the e-mails referenced in his letter are significant or not. i'm confident whatever they are will not change the conclusion reached in july. therefore, it's imperative that the bureau explain this issue in question, whatever it is, without any delay. so i look forward to moving forward to focus on the important challenges facing the american people, winning on
november 8th, and working with all americans to build a better future for our country. thank you. >> have you or any of your advisers heard from comey or anyone else at the fbi today? and are you concerned at all that these new e-mails that they say they have found will in any way reveal classified information that you sent or received? >> no. we have not been contacted by anyone. the first we knew about it is i assume when you knew about it, when this letter sent to republican members of the house was released. so we don't know the facts, which is why we are calling on the fbi to release all the information that it has. even director comey noted that this new information may not be significant, so let's get it out. >> you have 11 days to go. what would you say to a voter
who right now will be seeing you and hearing what you're saying, saying i didn't trust her before. i don't trust her anymore right now and they're heading to the ballot box tomorrow. >> you know, i think people a long time ago made up their minds about the e-mails. i think that's factored into what people think and now they're choosing a president. so i would urge everybody to get out and vote early in all the states that have early voting because i think americans want a president who can lead our country, who can get the economy working for everyone, not just those at the top, and who can bring our country together. i offer that, i can do that, and i'm very confident that the american people know that and we're going to continue to discuss what's at stake in this election because i believe that
it's one of the most consequential elections ever. >> thanks very much. secretary clinton, there are some reports that this -- these e-mails were found on devices that belonged to your aide, huma abedin, and her husband, anthony weiner. have you spoken to huma? was she able to give you any information about that? >> we've heard these rumors. we don't know what to believe. i'm sure there will be even more rumors. that's why it is incumnt upon the fbi to tell us what they're talking about, jeff. right now your guess is as good as mine. i don't think that's good enough. so we've made it very clear that if they're going to be sending this kind of letter that is only going originally to republican members of the house, that they need to share whatever facts they claim to have with the american people, and that's what i expect to happen. >> thanks very much, everybody. >> thank you all. >> hillary clinton speaking today saying that the fbi needs to share whatever facts they claim to have with the american people. that was her response today to this remarkable letter from the
fbi announcing that they are reviewing more e-mails that they have come across just in case they're important, but they might not be. joining us now is nbc news justice correspondent pete williams. very busy day for you, pete, i know. thanks for joining us tonight. >> you bet. >> is there any more reporting, any fuller understanding than we have at this point as to how the fbi uncovered these e-mails and what the character is of this new information they have got? >> i think it's pretty straightforward. they were investigating anthony weiner on allegations that he was sending illicit text messages and photographs to an underage girl. so they seized his laptop computer. after examining the computer, they discovered that huma abedin had also used the same laptop computer to e-mail hillary clinton at the clinton private server e-mail address. so that opened up the
possibility that there might be a universe of e-mails that they had not looked at. so that is where the -- that's where it stands right now. they found these e-mails. they believe that their mission in investigating the clinton e-mail case was to look at all the e-mails that went through her private server. they thought they had done that. now they have these new e-mails that they're going to look at and see whether any of them are ones that they haven't seen before. it's very possible that many of these if not all of them are duplicates with the ones they have already seen from examining the e-mails that hillary clinton turned over to the state department, others that the fbi found. some may be new, some may not be, but that's going to take time to work all that through. so the reason, as i understand it, that comey says in the letter that these e-mails are pertinent to the investigation is not because the fbi knows what's in them but because if their mission was to look at all the e-mails that went through the server, they have got to look at these now too. >> it's rare for the fbi in the normal course of events to make public statements about
investigations that are midstream, about investigations while they are ongoing. at this point is there any sense that within the fbi, any reporting that can tell us if there were sensitivities within the fbi about putting out a statement this vague, this tentative, saying this information may not necessarily even be significant, but obviously the statement, the letter from the fbi would have a political impact this close to the election? >> they're fully aware of that. two things i would point out. i think the reason they don't say this is the anthony weiner investigation is what you just said, they don't make statements about investigations that are in progress. and they didn't all the time during the clinton investigation until it was in essence over. what the fbi says is that comey, having told congress we've looked at the e-mail servers, we're pretty well done with that, he felt he had to tell them, well actually, hold the phone, we are now looking at more e-mails that may or may not
be relevant. but they were fully aware and they just felt that there was no good answer here, that it was the choice of the lesser of two evils. they either say it now and take the firestorm that they have got or wait until after the election when they know people would criticize them then too saying, wait a minute, you knew about this before the election and you didn't tell us. so they knew they were going to take heat no matter what and they decided this was the right course to be transparent or at least as transparent as they are. >> obviously we've just heard congressman elijah cummings and others demanding that the fbi offer more information about, this it's too vague and lending to too much supposition. do we have any sense of how long this review of the fbi will take? will they complete anything before election day? >> i can't imagine they'll complete this before election day. there are thousands of e-mails here. think of the process the fbi went through in looking at this the first time around. you got an e-mail. it might have classified information in it so you have to refer it to the agency that originated that information and
say is this classified now? was it then based on the -- and that takes a long time. that's one of the reasons why the clinton e-mail investigation took so long. so we're told that there are thousands of e-mails on this computer. to do all of that, there's no way that's going to be done before the election. and they're just getting started with this now. i'm told earlier today, earlier this evening that they don't have any idea what's on these e-mails yet, they're just getting to them. so will they say more about what we've been talking about, why they are here, what we know and don't know, i don't know. we'll have to wait and see if the fbi director changes his mind after all that's being said. but my impression is the sort of things being said now are not surprising to the fbi, they assume this is the sort of reaction they were going to get. >> nbc news justice correspondent pete williams. pete, i really appreciate your time tonight, thank you. >> okay, you bet. >> it's remarkable. yeah, what pete is saying about it not being done, they won't have anything further to report until after the election, that
you wo't t t up with part of aizza. um something wr so wn it comes to pain relievers, why put up with st part of a day? you want the whole tng yes, yes! live whole not part. aleve. deck. we've also got tim kaine tonight reacting to this letter from the fbi that has driven everybody around the bend in politics. that's all still coming. but if the fbi director had not decided to make himself the mysterious news of the day today, that honor would have probably otherwise have gone to meg whitman. i mean donald trump, sorry. meg whitman is one of the
high-profile republicans who this year supports hillary clinton for president. but in 2010 meg whitman was the republican candidate for governor in the state of california. 2010 was a huge republican year but things just got away from her in that race, target in mid-september. the polls just turned against meg whitman and they never came back. but deep into october in that race, she tried one big last move. she wrote her campaign a check for $20 million in october before the election. now, meg whitman is a zillionaire, she was self-funding her campaign anyway, but that late infusion of $20 million of her own cash, that was her showing confidence, right, full commitment right at the finish line. darn the polls, i'm all in, i'll put my money where my mouth is. it's a great move politically if you've got the cash to spend. still lost. meg whitman still lost by double digits, by 13 points, even with that last $20 million of her own money that she threw on fire --
set on fire and then threw down the well. well, today donald trump pulled a meg whitman sort of. he has said repeatedly over the course of the campaign that he will spend $100 million of his own money trying to get himself elected president. today he announced that he wired $10 million, $10 million of his own money into his campaign. you know, we know what kind of move that is, right? it shows incredible confidence. it makes it look like he's putting his money where his mouth is. except even with this $10 million splash that donald trump made today and all the headlines he got for it, he's still $34 million short of the10 million he was prepared to pony up for his campaign. so today's $10 million personal transfer from trump, it's a nice distraction from the amount of money that he hasn't spent on his campaign. it's also half the size of meg whitman's similar stunt in 2010. thanks to the fbi letter today,
the stunt by trump today landed with sort of half of the splash of what whitman did back in 2010. but still, this is a patented trick. the patented last-minute cash infusion from the wealthy candidate confidence trick. it has now been played by donald trump. we'll see if it works. at clorox 2 've tued movi stas into acien. now pre-treat with clox 2!
watcstains dispear right before your eyes. remove 4 times more stains than detergent alone. (vo) when i brought jake home, i wanted h to eat hethy. so i feed jake purina cachow narals indoor, a nutritious formula with no artificiallavors. de specifilly for door ts. purina cat chow. nutrition tbu. artificiallavors. or the freedom to choo what doctor you want to see. so if you'ren medicare,considern aa medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like any standardized medire sulement plan, yoll be able to ay with e doctor or specialist you trust... or look for someone new -- as long as theaccept medicare patients. and you're not stuck in a network... so why wait?ny ll now to request your free decision guide and learn more. we tught fibers that help caed unwanted gas.ar not good. then we switched t mirafiber. only mirafiber supports regularity
with dailycomfort fiber. and less likely to cause... unwanted gas. finally. swch to mirafiber. from thmake of miralax. the new olay eyesrise.four. ultimate eye cream. r instant results of the number one prestige eycream, without paying twice theri. r instsh yr azemt,of the number onot yo a.ge eycream, wiwith n olay eyes. ageless.
an avalanche of news. the democratic campaign and republican attempts to make gleeful hay out of it. the story is still cooking tonight. tonight in addition to live coverage from lawrence o'donnell after the show on "the last word," after that, my colleague, brian williams, will be here live, unusual on a friday night. he's going to be here to bring you latest developments, that's at 11:00 eastern here on msnbc. and we have coming up some crazy and important numbers from one american state. stay with us.
♪ soing new s arrived. ♪ inoducing the rst-er for infiniti qx30 crossover. visit yo local iiniti retail today. infiti. empower the dre. ar drums beating) fight heaa the mouthwatering soft chew that go to work in seconds to conquer heartrnast. tm tum tum tum.ng soft chew that go to work in seconds to conquewy delirnast. only frotums.
for over 1 years le t has,ous natural cheese u learn a lot about what people wan honewe he like a sercreamyheese u learn a lot about what with tacspicalready it? oh, thanks. bon apheese! okay... if you havmoderate severe plue psoriasis,, introducg otla (apremilast otla. n't it time to let the real you shi through? a pill th treats plaq psoriasis dierently. withzla,
75% cleaskin is achiable afte 4 mths, with reducededness thickness, and the otezprcribg fn and aliness of plaques. no requiment for roine lab moniring. don't take otezla if you are aergic no requiment for otezla may increase to athe riskdeprsion.ts. roine lab moniring. tell your doctor ou have history of or if thes gs delop.s, or suicidal someeople taking otezla reported weit loss. your doctor should monitor youreight d may stop tment. side effects m incle diarrhea nausea, uppe respiratory tract infection, and adache. ll your doctor about all d ask yoe dermogisaboutt or thmedicilaod.lanng to . otezla. ow mof you. election day is always on a tuesday. in 1992 on the friday before the election, so four days out from voting day, there was a big bombshell in that election, a
legal bombshell. >> tonight, new material that directly contradicts president bush's claim that he was out of the loop in the iran contra affair. a handwritten note from former defense secretary casper weinberger. >> in the final days of the campaign the last thing george bush needs is a reminder of the arms for hostages deal with iran. >> while bush was trying to convince voters they can't believe bill clinton, his own credibility was in question. bush has always said he was out of the loop of information when president reagan approved the arms for hostages swap, but a federal indictment of former defense secretary casper weinberger places bush at a key meeting. the bush camp hopes the note will not slow down the president's advance in some polls. >> now to andrea mitchell who's with bill clinton in pittsburgh where the iran contra affair became the campaign theme of the afternoon. >> tom, the iran contra developments were a gift to bill clinton who had been struggling
to counteract bush's attack on his credibility. campaigning in pittsburgh, clinton quickly interrupted his schedule to pounce on the revelations in the weinberger indictment. >> today's disclosure that president bush knew and approved of the arms for hostages deal with iran not only directly contradicts the president's claims, it diminishes the credibility of the presidency. >> reporter: in maine al gore also attacked. >> i think it's a real bombshell. the memorandum is a real smoking gun. i think it devastates his claim to the trust of the american people. >> the news comes at a good time for clinton. his lead was narrowing. >> i told you andrea mitchell is in every single clip, right? she's like a person who has been a great witness to history, andrea mitchell is history. just follow her life and you'll know everything important that's happened in america over that time span. four days before the 1992 election. we think of the iran contra
scandal as a 1980s thing. but four days before the election in '92, the special prosecutor brought a new criminal charge against the former defense secretary, and it made that one paragraph note public, which tied president bush to iran contra in a way he hadn't been tied to it before and threw the george h.w. bush campaign into flux. bill clinton went on to win that election in 1992. and then right after the election, that casper weinberger indictment that had come down four days before the election, it got thrown out a month later. before president bush left office, it got thrown out on december 12th, 1992. as for whether that story and that indictment, that new indictment right before the election, as to whether that actually hurt president george h.w. bush and his chances of re-elected, we cannot know that for sure, but he thought it did. >> i actually thought i was going to win in spite of the polls a few days before the
election. i must say when that mr. walsh came out with some indictments of -- >> of weinberger on the friday before. >> friday before the election, brought by his aide who was a big donor to the democratic party and a big democratic operative on the west coast, brings the indictment against weinberger and, heck, i'd talk about we're changing, the polls are closing, cnn has us only four points back or eight points back. and all these reporters want to talk about is the new indictment and whether that made me look like i hadn't told the truth, which i had told all along. but, you know, you talk about a politically timed indictment. and i didn't say it then. don't blame somebody else, just get on about your business, but that was a cruel blow. >> a cruel blow. that cap weinberger indictment was the late october surprise in the 1992 election. legally in the end turned out to be nothing.
it was gone before christmas. but not before its political impact was felt on election day. at least that's how the guy who lost that election saw it. how will fbi director james comey's announcement today play out in this campaign? how will it impact secretary clinton and her chances just 11 days out from this election? there is actually sort of a way to know that, and that's next. ♪ ♪ ♪ only those who dare drive e world forward. thcadiac ct6. jaknowhow to keep nice shorts,ad...g. this is whhh...e pros we. that's why hstarts h day with those t scoops in heart healthy llogg's raisin bran.
ready to eat my dust? too bad i already filled up on raisins. kellg's raisin bran. deliciously heart healthy. bumy back pain was making it hard to sleep then i found aleve pm. the only o to ine a sleeaid plus the 12 ur pain relievg rength oaleve. noi'back. eve pmor better am. mary buys a little lamb. onthis company's servers. accessibley thound
suppliers and employees onthisglal.any's servers. but wi cer threats on theise, mary's data could be under atta. with the help of at&t, and security that senses and mitigates ber reat their critical data is safer an ever. giving tm the agility to be open & secure. becae no one knows & like at&t. politico.com tonight is quoting former federal prosecutor saying that what the fbi did in this letter today is out of line. one former prosecutor tell politico, quote, i've got a lot of respect for jim comey but do not understand the idea of dropping this bombshell which could be a big dud. it just invites spulation. i question the timing of it. another former federal prosecutor saying this is particularly egregious since secretary clinton has no way to respond to what amounts to nebulous and speculative innuendo.
when i hear those words, i want to speak with ari melber, msnbc chief legal correspondent. ari, i know this has been a long day for you. thanks for being here, i appreciate it. >> absolutely, rachel. >> you said actually on twitter just a few minutes ago that this may be proper as a legal matter but distorting as a political matter. what do you mean by that? >> what i mean is that jim comey testified under oath they weren't looking at any more e-mails. if they are looking at more e-mails for any reason he feels he needs to update that testimony so it is fully accurate. when the facts change, you change your testimony to congress and he says as much in the letter. but the way he wrote the letter and what is happening in response, which you and others have been reporting on and documenting suggests that this is confusing, cryptic, distortive even if people given a cryptic set of messages think this is bigger than it is. jim comey may have been trying
to do the right thing legally, but has done it so poorly and so vaguely that practically it is a mess and distortive and something he may ultimately feel he needs to clean up in the next 11 days which in itself would invite more scrutiny. i've never seen anything quite like this. that is why it's so concerning. a stengs or -- a sentence or two to give context. that letter doesn't give any context. >> when elijah cummings said that he want the fbi before the send out to give additional information, is is that a clarifying statement, the sort of thing you can imagine the fbi saying, saying to be clear, we have not reviewed anything that indicates any new -- malfeasance or blah, blah, blah. could they issue that kind of clarifying statement recognizing the political impact of what they've done? >> i know we live in a world of hyperbole. i would say as a lawyer and journalist we don't know because this is unprecedented. james comey's original
presentation was a departure from regular procedure. given what had now amounted to half a briefing, he felt he had to complete it. is he going to give another briefing on the blow back to the blow back? it's possible, but when it is unusual, unusual criminal, or unusual because of the pressure and scrutiny he's under from both within his agency and the political climate, we don't know. i think based on what we know that it's unlikely that there is information that would change the legal conclusions. we don't know. >> nbc chief correspondent, pre-we appreciate it. stay with us. ♪ using 60,000 points om my chase i card boht all the framework... using 60,000 points om my chasewire... an needed to give my shop... a face...
no one will forget. see what the pow of pots can do for youbusiss. learmore at chase.m/ink see intercom: the library can do[ kis now closing.] ok kid, closing up. goodnight. the hardest part about homework shouldn't be figuring out where to do it. through internet essentials, comcast has connected over 3 million people in need to low-cost internet at home. welcome to a brighter future. comcast.
when you do this 11 days before a presidential election and don't provide many details, but details are apparently being given by the fbi to the press, this is very troubling. we hope that the director -- we think he should give a clearer accounting of exactly what's going on right now. >> vice presidential nominee tim kaine speaking today saying the fbi ought to give a clearer accounting of exactly what's going on right now. joining is bill burton, former deputy press secretary in the obama white house, he served in a similar capacity during the '08 campaign. good to see you. it's been a long time. >> it has been a long time. good to see you. >> i know that you are not impartial when it comes to democratic politics and who you want to win. tell me how you think the clinton campaign and their press
operation in particular is doing with this tonight. >> i think they're doing a good job. they've stayed on message, they've kept pressure on comey to release more information. you know, they've pointed out what a stupid thing this was for comby to do right before the election. i think that if jim comey wants to get involved in this election, here's a memo -- like russia is on a crime spree stealing emails from democrats to have an influence on this election and then releasing them. focus on that if you want to focus on emails. but don't just jump into the election and throw everything into chaos just because you can. >> that said, jim comey is not on the ballot. he's not a household name. picking a fight with the fbi is a hard fight to win, each if you're really good at -- even if you're really good at spinning the press on it. i think what the fbi did personally seems ridiculous to me. but in erms it was housewife you handle this, i don't know how you win a fight in the press against the fbi. >> here's the other thing that hillary clinton did in her statement which was she turned it toward the american people
have a right to have a conversation about the issues that actually matter in their lives. and donald trump has robbed the american people of that experience in this election. we had debates where he didn't talk about climate change, jobs, immigration or education. and in these final days, we're talking about something that has been litigated and already decided by the american people. and so i think when hillary clinton turns toward her positive vision for the country, which she did in that statement today, i think that's leading us down a track to her closing argument, and the american people actually picking who they want to be their commander in chief. >> bill, one of the things that the clinton campaign has played with sort of a very wide margin, they swung far in both directions on this front, is the question of how much they make their candidate available to the press. we had hillary clinton not taking very many questions, not doing a lot of press conferences early on in the campaign. then -- they took a lot of heat for a long time. then she was doing press availability every day, sometimes more than once a day.
she did do the press conference this afternoon, answering a couple of questions from the press. the whole thing was over in about five minutes. should she get out and take a lot more questions this? should she do a press conference where she answers questions until nobody has anymore, should she engage i? >> the unfortunate reality for hillary clinton s there does not become a moment where people don't have more questions for her. she's targeted by republicans in a way where they constantly hit her with questions. i'm glad she did the short availability today. there's nothing vague about the letter comey sent to capitol hill. she needed to address. she knew the news would be focused on it. she needs to turn the pang and focus on what's important to the american people as they are picking their commander in chief in polling places and with early ballots right. now. >> we saw chairman podesta today release, chairman of the clinton campaign, release a statement going at the fbi really hard. it is extraordinary that we
would see something like this 11 days out from a presidential election. the director of the fbi owes it to the american people to immediately provide the full details of what he is examining. you heard that heechoed by congressman cummings at the top of the show. we heard it in a written statement from congressman john conyers, ranking democrat on the judiciary committee. demands that the fbi should say more. what happens politically if they did say more? i imagine they'd still leave us with something that republicans would make hay lot out. >> podesta's comments that the fbi should do more and shouldn't have engaged in this way is important. comey was appointed by george w. bush, number two at his justice department. he's a partisan republican. he showed that in his comments about not indicting hillary clinton the first time around. i think this time he did something that was particularly sloppy and reckless. and it's fully within the right
of the clinton campaign to call them out on it. people ought to know that this is beyond the norms that the fbi -- of what the fbi would do in a normal situation. >> bill burton, former deputy press secretary in the obama white house. nice to see you. thanks for your time tonight. >> you, too, rachel. i want to show you something different. i want to show you sometng totally unrelated to this maddening, ridiculous fbi letter. totally unrelated. i want to show you something real out of swing state north carolina. you may remember policy fights over the fact that the number of polling locations were cut dramatically. with fewer locations, we have seen really, really long lines for early voting. people have been determined to wait. we've also seen that proves when you cut down the number of places people can vote, you step on the neck in terms of people having an opportunity to vote. and it does reduce the number of
people who vote. guilford county, the first time they had a single location serving over half a million people. guilford county down 85% from 2012. yesterday, guilford added 24 more polling sites. look what happened -- guilford county set a one-day record for the number of people voting. people want to vote, and not just in guilford county. it's true statewide. for the first seven days early voting in north carolina with few locations open, way below 2012 yesterday. yesterday the state et cetera panneded the number of poll -- ex-panneded the number of polling places. north carolina was up so much so that north carolina is ahead of where it was four years ago. that happened in one day once they finally opened polling places. north carolina expecting even bigger problems this weekend when more people are on off. amazing. turns out when you don't actively try to make ift hard ad
inconvenient for people to vote, they vote. i have a feeling the people who meat it hard and inconvenient to vote, i have a feeling they knew that. msnbc live is next. the director himself has said he doesn't know when the emails referenced in his letter are significant or not. i'm confident whatever they are will not change the conclusion reached in july. >> the investigation is the biggest political scandal since watergate, and it's everybody's hope that happen justice at last can be delivered. >> reaction from hillary clinton and donald trump to the stunning news of the fbi reviewing more emails related to the former secretary of state's personal server. good to be with you on this saturday morning. i'm frances rivera live in new york at msnbc world headquarters. just ten day