tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC March 17, 2017 10:00pm-11:01pm PDT
hearings for neil gorsuch. to get ready for those gorsuch hearings, sunday night 5:00 p.m. eastern, a special look at go such and those hearings hosted by ari melbur. you should watch this. he's sitting in for lawrence because he works too much. thank you. >> thank you for the plug. as for working too much, the old saying, look who's talking. >> i feel it. thanks. >> have a great weekend. donald trump has doubled down on his unsubstantiated accusation that president obama wiretapped him. now the chickens are coming home to roost. >> why are you so scared of diversity in the news? you speak so often of fake news. >> fake news. fake news, folks. >> a president of the united states is using a pundit as a sourced fact. >> you shouldn't be talking to me, you should be talking to fox. >> the president of the united states just said they were relying on a fox news analyst. >> he just accused our closest ally, britain, of spying on him.
>> we're now seeing an exercise in damage limitation. >> certainly on the face of it, it's awkward. the europeans are catching their heads. >> believe it or not, donald trump has only been president for 7 1/2 weeks. i know. >> the white house is also battling resistance to the budget, health care. >> i'm 100% behind this. >> defeat on health care would really be demoralizing for this presidency. >> we have done far more, i think maybe more than anybody's done in this office, in 50 days. >> trump has done more in office the way a toddler helps out in the kitchen. >> health care! health care for all! health care for all! >> it's hard for most people to run away from their problems, because problems have a way of running with you. that's what donald trump found today as he tried to run away
from his domestic problems by focusing on foreign affairs. but that just put a global spotlight on trump's struggle to explain his baseless accusation that obama wiretapped him, a performance that has shown trump blustering, then nervous, now full of righteous blame as he pretends his accusation was from other people. >> are there from time to time tweets that you regret in hindsight? >> very seldom. we said nothing. all we did was quote a certain very talented legal mind who was the one responsible for saying that on television. i didn't make an opinion on it, that was a statement made by a very talented lawyer on fox. and so you shouldn't be talking to me, you should be talking to fox. >> so trump's new defense of his discredited claim that is it's not his claim. he didn't make an opinion on it, except then he did. again, in the same presser,
suggesting that the premise that the u.s. surveilled him was still operative, just like he claims it surveilled angela merkel in 2013. >> as far as wiretapping, i guess by this past administration, at least we have something in common, perhaps. >> perhaps. that's actually not true. while it was revealed that the u.s. did snoop on merkel's cell phone for a time, there is, of course, no evidence to support trump's claim that he was specifically targeting for wiretaps. all the latest news only reinforces that. intel committee leaders in both parties rebutting trump. today we can report nbc news documenting that trump's own justice department provided materials to those committees and they do not support trump's claims. also the same doj confirming today that it had, quote, complied with those congressional requests for proof. here's the bottom line right now.
there are only two types of government sources on this story. those who have rebutted trump completely, and those who haven't spoken yet. the first category includes virtually everyone in a position to know, while the second category includes one man holding his rhetorical fire, fbi director james comey, who will testify before congress on monday, a hearing that may even overshadow president trump's preferred monday headline, those hearings for his supreme court nominee. the old theory was that all of this type of stuff, these trump tweets, were clever distractions, deft moves of political chess to avoid negative headlines. but this has become the negative headline. it doesn't look like political chess. it looks increasingly like a game of political russian roulette with trump taking reckless shots that can easily wound his own administration. the record shows that's what sean spicer thought when he tried to muzzle trump and shut down this story, that was two weeks ago, when he first responded to the wiretap tweet
by telling reporters," neither the white house nor the president will comment further on the issue until congress looks into it." that statement proved inoperative because trump keeps commenting. and that ensures he keeps taking his problems with him wherever he goes. joining me now is jonathan finer, former chief of staff to secretary of state john kerry, a contributor to "foreign policy" magazine. evan siegfried, author of "gop gsp." dared corn, washington bureau chief for "mother jones," msnbc political analyst. david, the record is voluminous. the record shows this claim of wiretap is false. >> well, of course it does. and it's also true that the stice department has no evidence that there's an easter bunny and there's no evidence that barack obama mugged donald trump in the streets of new york in 1987. he just says stuff. sometimes it pops into his head,
sometimes it comes from breitbart. today it came from fox, from a guy he called a very talented legal mind who happens to be a 9/11 truther, andrew napolitano. and when trump gets caught head he says, well, it wasn't me. i'm just the president here. you should go after fox. he's essentially saying, they report, we repeat. that's it. he doesn't feel that he has any obligation to vet anything that he says or tweets, and you almost, you don't but you almost have to feel sorry for the sean spicers, kellyanne conways, who are people who know better but pretend they don't. >> that's become part of their job is to pretend otherwise. the wiretapping story causing international problems with sean spicer citing that debunked report claiming that britain's intelligence services wiretapped him as well.
jonathan, unpack that for us. >> yes. so look, i think that the president hit an unbelievably negative trifecta in his press availability with chancellor merkel today. one, he reopened the wound with the uk that his team had tried to clean up earlier in the morning by again asserting they had wiretapped him when we all know that's not the case. he also drag the chancellor and the german government into this fray, which i'm sure was the last thing they wanted when they're trying to build a relationship with the united states. >> we didn't book a body language expert, but she didn't look "into it," didn't look like she liked it. >> the third piece, in some ways the most troubling, he further drew down his own eroding credibility. there's going to be a time the president faces a crisis that's not of his making and he'll need credibility to go to allies and the country and say, trust me, this is what is happening and this is what we need to do. he's undermining his ability to build that up trust. >> take a listen to donald trump trying to say that this all comes back to whether or not he used scare quotes.
>> when i say wiretap, those words were in quotes. that really covers. because wiretapping is pretty old-fashioned stuff. that really covers surveillance and many other things. nobody ever talks about the fact that it was in quotes. we have it before the committee and we will be submitting things before the committee very soon that hasn't been submitted as of yet. it's potentially a very serious situation. >> so all we did was quote a certain very talented legal mind who was the one responsible for saying that on television. i didn't make an opinion on it. that was a statement made by a very talented lawyer on fox. >> you see that msnbc fact check on each of those claims. these are falsehoods that he seems to think will still work with somebody? >> they'll work with his base, who will buy anything he sells. but it's not factually true. every single organization that is said it's not true. and it's distracting. and the fact that the president of the united states has gone out and basically thrown -- said
the buck stops somewhere over there, not with me, like harry truman said, is very disturbing. the president of the united states is also accidentally admitting that if anybody puts something in front of him, he's going to believe it. so if i tell him i'm the creator of "sesame street" and he's now going to believe it. as a republican, i'm very concerned by that. we have in one day, as jonathan mentioned, upset our closest ally, and one of the closest allies we'll need, especially in the fight on isis, as well as to deal with the refugee crisis that's going on in syria. i don't understand how today was a productive day. and throwing somebody else under the bus and not taking personal responsibility and saying i'm sorry, i messed up, that's not presidential. and that's not something we need in a leader. >> david, there are larger politics on that. evan brings up "sesame street." this is like when they were always telling big burden snuffle lup does was around the corner, eventually big period didn't believe it. there's a credibility analogy but i don't want to stretch it too far.
i want you to listen to tom cole, republican, talking about what should happen next. it's all well and good to say, donald trump does this and his base likes it and that's the end of the story. it's not the end of the story. he's a flue new president. here's a republican saying what should be done. >> frankly, unless you can produce some pretty compelling proof, i think the president, you know, president obama is owed an apology in that regard. because if he didn't do it, we shouldn't be reckless in accusations that he did. >> david? >> well, that's at the very least. i don't think we'll ever see donald trump apologize for everything. he has said, he was asked during the campaign, have you ever regretted anything, have you ever had to apologize? and he said, eh, after 70 years, no. so there will be no apology. this is a fellow who can never concede really doing anything wrong from his bankruptcies to his lies. it doesn't matter. i do think jonathan finer's point from early on is the dead-on thing.
right now we have rex tillerson and others talking about going to war with north korea and jonathan's right. one day the president will have to say, listen, we have intelligence saying this or that, and because of that we took military action. and how can you believe donald trump on anything? that intelligence could be something that he heard on alex jones' radio show that morning. this is a guy who can't tell the difference between real facts, alternative facts, and things he just makes up. >> i mean, look, i obviously agree with that and i think one of the big problems that we have right now is there are too few people with credibility on these issues who are speaking on behalf of the united states. that starts frankly with the secretary of state, rex tillerson, who thankfully has now started allowing briefings to be conducted from the state department. we didn't have any between roughly january 19th and march 6th. he's finally started to answer some questions of his own in a press availability in asia. but what we need is policy statements. speeches.
public diplomacy conducted by people other than the president and the press secretary who i don't think are the best face for america to the world right now on these issues. >> david, on the confirmation of all of this, in court, lawyers never want to ask a question they don't know the answer to. because you end up looking really stupid. and here is donald trump out there not prepared and says, just go ask fox news. the folks at fox news he talks to all the time. his staff talks to them, he talks to tucker carlson. he could have checked this out, he clearly didn't. after saying that here's what happened. shep smith. >> fox news cannot confirm judge napolitano's commentary. fox news knows of no evidence of any kind that the now-president of the united states was surveilled at any time in any way, full stop. >> full stop, david. >> well, you know. kudos to shep smith and others at fox who don't want to be tarred by donald trump's lies. as much as others on the network have enabled him. and we can never forget, ari, i
know you don't, that this was a guy who for three years ran around saying, i have evidence that the president wasn't born in hawaii! i have my investigators! you can't believe what they're reporting to me, you can't believe the information i'm seeing, information that we never saw. that even didn't make to it newsmax. so this is a fellow who again and again commits the same crime. we shouldn't be surprised. and it's too bad that so many people have fallen for it. and now you see a lot of republicans, tom cole is an exception, who still try to apologize for this. or at least pretend it's not a very serious matter. >> david, i think you may have just coined a new standard. the "not even newsmax will touch it" standard for those who follow newsmax.com. >> this isn't just on foreign policy, we've seen a pattern with the president since he took office where he'll say or do something and make a promise he
won't uphold. how is that going to help him negotiating with congress over passing legislation and trying to strong arm them into passing the affordable health care act thursday in the house when he goes back on his word? he did it last weekend with preet bharara. blaming other people and saying, it was in scare quotes. i don't understand from the republicans i've spoken to on the hill, they are nervous, they don't think he can keep his word. you need to have that as a president of the united states. >> absolutely. jonathan finer, david corn, evan, thank you so much. coming up, president trump says the health care bill, going grate great! another republican senator saying it's doa. later, a look at the cost of brinksmanship in trump's foreign policy.
trust #1 doctor recommended dulcolax. use dulcolax tablets for gentle dependable relief. suppositories for relief in minutes. and dulcoease for comfortable relief of hard stools. dulcolax. designed for dependable relief. the market.redict but through good times and bad... ...at t. rowe price... ...we've helped our investors stay confident for over 75 years. call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence.
he'll be asked about probes into russia and trump's wiretapping accusations. the implications to that are large. yet at the same time, the senate will also hear its first testimony on one of the most far-reaching decisions trump will make in office. his selection of judge neil gorsuch to replace that supreme court vacancy that arose during obama's term. what does gorsuch stand for? he says he wants to follow in scalia's footsteps. what could that mean for civil rights, gay marriage, money, and politics, and trump's travel ban? i'm excited to tell you i am anchoring a two-hour special on that confirmation fight on the eve of the hearings, sunday, 5:00 p.m. eastern, joined by senators on the judiciary committee, leaders at naacp and planned parenthood, conservative legal scholars, a former clerk to judge gorsuch. i'd like to think it's the ultimate pregame for confirmation day. i hope you all will tune in. i hope you'll keep it locked here on "the last word." next we're reporting on that story, trump saying the health care bill is all coming
together, now a key republican senator saying he won't even vote for it. we've done well in life, with help from our advisor, we made it through many market swings. sure we could travel, take it easy... but we've never been the type to just sit back... not when we've got so much more to give when you have the right financial advisor, life can be brilliant. ameriprise
president trump says he has convinced some skeptical house republicans to support his bill to replace obamacare. >> we met with 12 pretty much noes in congress, you saw that, they went from all noes to all yeses. and we have a lot of yeses coming in. it's all coming together. it's going to be passed, i believe, i think substantially pretty quickly. it's coming together beautifully. >> are the yeses coming in? some of the most outspoken republican opponents of the bill
say they're not changing their minds. 16 house republicans publicly saying they're vote no or at least leaning towards it. none of them meeting with president trump. congressman justin demash, absolutely not true conservatives have flipped to yes on the health care we'll, it doesn't repeal obamacare, it remains a disaster. the bill faces a bigger problem in the senate where it can lose no more than two republican votes to pass. republican senators rand paul and susan collins already saying they won't vote for this bill. a third republican senator, this is big, dean heller of nevada, says he also will not vote for the bill. he told bloomberg news, "i don't support the house bill in its current form." joining us now is jared bernstein, former chief economist to vice president biden and msnbc contributor, evan siegfried, author of "gop gps." jared, let's start with politics. i know you want to get deep into insurance rates and all that. but --
>> i do. >> you know this congress. on a scale of definitely passing to oh my god we have a problem, what does it mean when this early in the push they're losing this many republicans? >> much closer to we have a problem. but i wouldn't say that the likelihood that this gets out of the house is zero. you know, there's a chance that they're going to be able to muster votes. the hard part is that you just heard the hard-right republican say this draconian bill, and i won't go into the numbers other than to say it unwinds the coverage benefits of obamacare in part by really gutting the medicaid program. >> jared, it's friday night, you keep that calculator in your pocket. >> well, and transferring all of those hundreds of billions of benefits to rich people. so that's not far-right enough for some of this caucus. meanwhile there's moderates,
many of whom have the medicaid expansion in their states, and they're hard pressed to vote for a bill that's going to take 14 million people off the rolls. but it could come out of the house. it could go over to the senate. something very different could come out of the senate. and then you'd have this collision in conference. and i have a hard time seeing what that produces. >> and evan, the politics here, of course, most senators in the republican party are on the record being against obamacare. that's the easy part politically. look at senator jolene ernest in iowa, trying to make her case to her constitt wins on this fight. >> we can't maintain the current status of the law because we know that it is -- it's failing already. [ crowd yelling ] >> health care for all! health care for all! health care for all! health care for all! health care for all!
health care for all! >> that's the grass roots. here's the quote of the senator, to give her her due. senator ens telling "the des moines register," after that health care town hall i can't say whether i support it or i don't support it, this republican bill. we have to know how it's going to impact iowa families. we were able to hear some of that today. >> i'm a conservative and i didn't like obamacare, i didn't think it should go in. but now affordable health coverage is a right. people don't like when it you try and take away a right. be you on the right or the left. when you actually look at what's in this bill and what it does, it takes a top-down approach which most conservatives massively object to. giving a family of four a $4,000 tax credit no matter where they are. family in southwest pennsylvania under obamacare now gets under obamacare $11,000 paid toward insurance. in this proposal it's $4,000. areas in appalachia have talked about donald trump, donald trump has talked about an opioid
epidemic, this bill allows people to impose a cap on coverage, be it treatment for addiction, mental illness, or chemotherapy. they could yank the needle out of your arm. >> you're basically saying this bill isn't good for the working class, white or not white? >> it's not good for anyone. i don't think i've seen a health care bill like this unite both republicans and democrats in opposition, but it's for different reasons. >> so i think evan's making a critical point that has kind of gotten lost in the mix because we've been focused on the republican plan. and the point is, obamacare has created a baseline. it is a new baseline that it is going to be extremely hard to come in this far under. if you had a bill that sort of tweaked things away in a way that the cbo said might be a little worse, maybe you could bend yourself into believing that this could really meet that baseline. but what 37 come up with is miles below the baseline.
it's losing republicans, senators, governors, and members of the house. >> to that point, look at republican governor case trick ohio, hutchison in arkansas, snyder in michigan, and sandoval, who wrote this letter to mitch mcconnell and paul ryan. they say, look, this bill provides almost no flexibility for states and doesn't assure the resources necessary to make sure no one's left out and shifts significant new costs to states. it's one thing to have a libertarian ideology, another thing to say, we have an obligation as governors do day to day to make this work. >> yeah, i think that you're seeing governors recognize this is going to be an unsustainable budget crunch in ohio and throughout the country. especially in michigan. and i think we're seeing a lot of people recoil. this bill is a very bad bill. the president has married himself to it and is refusing to divorce it, the first time he's ever refused to divorce anything. so we're seeing the president of the united states, who didn't
even get in this bill what he wanted, which was eliminating state lines, which is a perfectly reasonable thing to do to create competition that even democrats could get behind. and nobody loves it. the only thing that is actually good, and it's only good for millennials, are the health savings accounts because they're the most fiscally conservative generation and they save. >> evan is a very nice guy, a nice country club republican. when he's busting out a sick burn like that, you know he's clearly passionate. final word to you on the road ahead. if this is the only thing, which is what paul ryan says, and this can't get through the senate by the rough count, then what? >> then probably what happens is all those people, all those hard-right republicans and donald trump who ran on replacing obamacare, go back to their districts and say, we tried, folks, but that damn senate won't let us do it. and it goes back to business as usual. that doesn't mean obamacare is out of the woods. once this government stops supporting the measure, it's obviously going to be harder to sustain.
but obamacare may be in better shape than many of us thought it was on election night. >> yeah. it is an extraordinary set of developments and it seems to relate in part to the white house's choice or inability to actually do detailed negotiating even though we've heard a lot about -- briefly, jared. >> never underestima how lousy this white house is at governing thus far. >>o you're not accusing the administration of competence? >> you said it better and quicker than i could. which is a skill. jared bernstein, evan siegfried, thanks for joining, appreciate it. coming up, this is a whole other story. donald trump's top diplomat saying all options, including military force, now on the table if north korea doesn't back off and denuclearize. the last time the u.s. was on this brink with north korea was back during the clinton presidency. i'll talk to the lead negotiator of the deal that averted what some feared a war with north korea, straight ahead. cowards die many times before their deaths. the valiant taste of death, but once!!
uh, excuse me, waiter. i ordered the soup... of course, ma'am. my apologies. c'mon, caesar. let's go. caesar on a caesar salad? surprising. excuse me, pardon me. what's not surprising? how much money matt saved by switching to geico. could i get my parking validated? fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. dearthere's no other way to say this. it's over. i've found a permanent escape from monotony. together, we are perfectly balanced. our senses awake. our hearts racing as one. i know this is sudden, but they say...if you love something set it free. see you around, giulia
the unpredictability of a flaree may weigh on your mind. thinking about what to avoid, where to go, and how to work around your uc. that's how i thought it had to be. but then i talked to my doctor about humira, and learned humira can help get and keep uc under control... when certain medications haven't worked well enough. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems,
serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. raise your expectations and ask your gastroenterologist if humira may be right for you. with humira, control is possible.
turning to an important story that may have been overshadowed this week, trump's foreign policy brinksmanship. on his first trip to asia, secretary of state rex tillerson said he wanted to be clear that the trump administration would consider a military first strike option against north korea. >> let me be very clear. the policy of strategic patience has ended. all the options are on the table. certainly we do not want for
things to get to a military conflict, we're quite clear on that in our communications. but obviously if north korea takes actions that threaten the south korean forces or our own forces that will be met with an appropriate response. if they elevate the threat of their weapons program to a level that we believe requires action, that option is on the table. >> tillerson also toured the heavily guarded demilitarized zone where north and south korean forces stand just feet from each other. a south korean soldier was seen snapping a picture of tillerson through a window. there is a context for these threats. in recent weeks north korea has conducted a series of ballistic missile tests. experts tracking whether they're proceeding towards the capacity to achieve nuclear-tipped missiles that could reach japan or the u.s. tillerson's comments reflect an intentional escalation of sorts of pressure designed by the state department.
president trump meanwhile striking a similar note but in bumper sticker form tweeting, north korea is behaving very badly. they have been playing the u.s. for years. china has done little to help. for a simple response to that simple message, consider china is north korea's strongest ally and largest trading partner. they're not known for helping that much in this arena. tillerson, meanwhile, will be in china on saturday. former members of the clinton administration have said the u.s. considered a strike on a north korean facility in '94 when it was on the brink of producing weapons-grade material. ambassador robert ga lucci was the chief negotiator, distinguished move soar at george town. let me start with the interpretive question. nothing new about the u.s. trying to be strong while leaving some options open. what did you hear in tillerson's statement there? is it normal or different?
>> ari, it may have been normal in the sense that there's nothing new, there's no news. if all the secretary meant was that all options are on the table when we consider what to do about north korea and a policy review, then he's said what other administrations have said in this context and others. if all he meant, if all he meant was that if north korea was about to strike one of our treaty allies, republic of korea or japan, or the united states of america, that in that case we would feel free to preempt that strike, that's still nothing new. we would expect nothing less from our president. however, if he meant something else, if he meant that we were not going to allow that north koreans to develop an intercontinental ballistic missile that could be mated with a nuclear weapon, if they went to test such a missile -- not attack but test such a missile -- we would contemplate at least
striking it, striking north korea to destroy that missile, that would be new. that wouldn't be a preemptive strike that would be preventive war. >> ambassador, this is diplomatic speech. are you saying it was vague and open to those interpretations? if so, was it strategically vague? >> i think it was vague. and i don't know whether it was strategic, whether the secretary intended to leave that ambiguity there. i simply don't know. i do know, though, that one should not expect, we should not expect, the united states should not expect to strike north korea kin netcally with a military strike and have no response from north korea. that means we would have to be ready for military engagement, for war. and so would our allies in japan and south korea. >> what about president trump's belief that on this, like on trade issues, china can be bent in some way?
>> we have had a theory of dealing with north korea by going to beijing and having the principal supporter of north korea use its influence in pyongyang to bring the north koreans around. that we tried in the clinton administration. it has been tried in the bush administration, the obama administration. and is every reason why we should keep trying. this is something of a chinese phenomenon in that sanctions are limited in their impact because china makes sure they're limited in their impact. but going to china is not really a policy. it is something that should be part of an overall approach to north korea, but we shouldn't expect now it will start working where before it hadn't. >> ambassador and professor robert ga lucci, thank you for your guidance and expertise tonight. >> thank you. coming up, the trump white house wanted to make sure everyone read the positive coverage in "the washington post" about its budget. it included the link at the top of an e-mail to reporters.
there's a hilton for you. book your break direct with hilton.com and join the weeklong weekenders. my belly pain i could build a small city with all the over-the-counter products i've used. enough! i've tried enough laxatives to cover the eastern seaboard. i've climbed a mount everest of fiber. probiotics? enough! (avo) if you've had enough, tell your doctor what you've tried and how long you've been at it. linzess works differently from laxatives. linzess treats adults with ibs with constipation or chronic constipation. it can help relieve your belly pain, and lets you have more frequent and complete bowel movements that are easier to pass. do not give linzess to children under six, and it should not be given to children six to less than eighteen. it may harm them. don't take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain, especially with bloody or black stools. the most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe. if it's severe stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away. other side effects include gas,
stomach-area pain and swelling. talk to your doctor about managing your symptoms proactively with linzess. be careful what you eat. be careful what you tweet. if you're sharing an article, read more than the head line. the trump white house was reminded of that basic lesson when it sent out a link to an article that was trashing trump's budget. a "washington post" article. but was headlined "trump's budget makes perfect sense and will fix america and i'll tell you why." solid headline. but this piece was a satire. by a humor writer, alexandra petrie. she was using a trump-style fan fiction voice to say, this budget will make america a lean, mean fighting machine! with bulging, ripping muscles, not an ounce of fat! how will i survive on this budget, you may be wondering? i am a human child, no the a costly fighter jet. well, you may not survive. but that is because you are soft and weak!
something this budget is designed to eliminate. now, that already has since been removed from the online version of the white house's daily newsletter. here for more on all things budget and trump, selena maxwell, director of progressive programming for sirius xm and former official with the hillary clinton campaign, erin gloria, "the daily beast." is this a mistake anyone could make? anyone's friend, mom, dad, brother, could post something having not read it. >> sure, absolutely. but i'm glad they're not the president of the united states. i think the sort of person who doesn't take care to read past the deadline is not the sort of person you want in charge of anything important. >> of anything, yeah. >> but here we are. especially when it's something as consequential as the budget. you have an anti-poverty budget that's really going to impact people in their real lives. and so you want a white house who's going to pay attention to the details. and they didn't do that here.
>> let me give you an article headline you don't have to read because it matches the content of the article. "the new york daily news," one of our hometown tabloids, they make it pretty clear. "trump budget axes terror funds." they call it "madness." you see that provocative cover. they say nypd security aid slashed, mayor saying the president's putting us in the crosshairs. and nypd chief who doesn't do a ton of national politicking also just put out online the statement, how do you say you're pro-cop and anti-terror, and you slash us completely? >> i mean, i think that the president and his administration talk all the time about how we need to keep americans safe. but this demonstrates that they aren't putting any meat on the bones of their rhetoric in terms of policies that would actually go to do that. they put forward a muslim ban which has been knocked down again by the courts. so i think they're going to have to come up with some more detailed strategies on how to actually combat terrorism th
aren't banning an entire religion from entering the country. >> to take it seriously, is the president counting on the fact that cops in new york won't read the daily news or listen to their chief? at what point do they say, oh, he campaigned on being for us, and it's not like a 5% haircut, it's the federal government bailing on the police department in obviously one of the largest terror targets in the country. >> there's a range of possibilities between these extremes. a, it could be it was an oversight, that maybe somebody got a little bit too happy with the pen and crossed something out they shouldn't have crossed out. they did tweet out an article that was a satirical takedown of their budget as praise, so it is possible somebody made a mistake. also, there's part of my brain that sees trump as sort of somebody that's driven by fear and spite. and it seems as though he's really hated in his hometown of new york city. across all different types of
people. it doesn't seem that out of line to me to imagine he'd be somebody that maybe doesn't care as much about new york city because they haven't cared about him. >> that it's all about where he's getting the love. >> right. as jay-z would say, either love me or leave me alone. if he's not feeling the love, it may not be there. listen to tom cole from the budget committee talking about how these budgets work. to be clear to viewers as folks probably know, this is the beginning, not the end, and congress makes a lot more decisions. >> budgets are all tradeoffs. in the end, the president proposes a budget, he did exactly what he's required to do by law. but congress has to work through it. i would actually be tougher on congress here. i'd be tough on the president too. >> how about that? sometimes it is a trump-fixated world, i'm fully guilty as a member of the media being sometimes a part of that. but this is the congress' constitutional responsibility. they're going to have to decide whether they see this as a blueprint, or say wow, too hard to square, even budget hawks say
you can't cut 30% out in one year and expect things to work. >> i think this is going to be an interesting test for congress at republicans to see if they're going to oppose things that the president's putting forward. i think in terms of budgets, budgets are moral documents. budgets set the -- essentially tell the country what your priorities are, which groups of americans are priorities for your administration. in this administration and this document that came out, it's clear that poor people, elderly people, people of color, are not high up on the list of the trump administration's priorities. now that may or may not be true for congressional republicans who have to run every two years in the house, every six years in the senate. they have a different calculus. >> you make a great point, it comes back to choices. i will end with a quick excerpt from that satire article. there are arts cuts. the article explained the n. amendment, national endowment for the arts, will be destroyed but replaced with an armored helicopter with a shark painted on it, which is art.
that's art too. we'll take a quick break. on monday we're going to hear from fbi director james comey as i mentioned. for the first time in public remarks about russia's interference in the 2016 election and any related investigations. he's also of course going to be asked about trump's claim that he was personally wiretapped by barack obama and any attendant proof. the panel weighs in after the break. ♪
if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach.
there's no denying next week logic big for congress and could be a mixed bag on how it all unfolds. monday confirmation hearings for supreme court nominee judge neil gorsuch in the senate. also monday, fbi director jim comey testifying for the first time before the house intel committee about any russian interference in the presidential election and trump's wiretapping claims, get your popcorn. as if that wasn't enough, house
republicans now saying they think they'll have enough support for a full vote on health carrie peel as soon as thursday. today some members of the republican study committee are saying they will support the bill after some alleged concessions from the president. our panel is back. what a panel it is. zerlina and erin. this was a big issue in the campaign. i mentioned you worked for hillary. >> yes. >> donald trump didn't win more votes but he did win the thing that matters, electoral college. >> yes. >> he ran 100% on repealing obamacare. it is proving harder, though. >> yes, i think one of the reasons it's proving harder is because it's a lot easier to say i'm going to repeal and replace obamacare as a talking point than it is to take away health insurance from americans who are benefiting from it right now. the old saying is, people don't know who gave you health insurance, but they're going to know exactly who took it away from them. they're going to know when they go to the doctor and they ask for a much larger co-pay than they're used to paying, who is to blame for that. i think it's the damage for republicans that is they're taking away something from people.
>> let me push back on that, erin. let me put forward a different theory which is that everything trump's doing is great and the press hasn't been speaking properly about it. >> hm. >> under that theory, it's not so much what he's doing but the improper words of the press. here is the president on that point today. >> i want everyone to know i'm 100% behind us. i want everybody to know that the press has not been speaking properly about how great this is going to be. they have not been giving it a fair press. the press is, well, as you know, in many cases, i call it the fake news. it's fake news. this is going to be great for people. i just want to let the world know i am 100% in favor. >> if you could respond without speaking improperly, i would appreciate it. >> sure. sorry, as a member of the press, it's very difficult for me to not speak improperly. one thing i want to say is donald trump right now is coming up with -- coming up on a real-life confrontation between his words and reality. people who in the middle of the
country, who maybe voted for him, who don't really care about russia, don't really care about the integrity europe, don't have time to think about that, care about their health and care about how much of their money is going to pay for health care. if donald trump can't follow through on his promise, this is something that's going to affect them and the proof will be in the pudding. regardless of what donald trump says, these people will still have to pay more for health care. it's not the press saying it, it's the congressional budget office, it's individual analysis of what the impact on families would be. >> it's like hillary clinton throwing shade at president trump and saying, you've just discovered health care is complicated. that's a real quote. diplomacy is exhausting. she's travelled a lot, right. getting things through congress. it's not about strong or weak. i work the in the senate, lawrence worked in the senate. it's not about whether people are aggressive. >> right. >> they're all aggressive. they made to it the u.s. senate. like people who tend to be president are aggressive. that doesn't get you over the line.
there's a lot more nuance and collaboration that's required. do you think he's evincing it yet? >> no, i don't think so. i think he's going to have a tough time, one, because he's never held elected office so understanding how politics works just in a really basic level is going to be -- it's been difficult for him, it will continue to be difficult for him. but also, you just can't strongarm your way to passing a legislative agenda. that's not how this works. and the guy who sold trump university to people and stole their money should -- he's not the one that i'm going to believe when he's saying, you're going to like this plan, trump care's going to save you so much money. i don't believe him. >> you're saying he stole the money in fairness, he did give $25 million of it back when he was forced to in court. >> right. i mean, listen. >> if you're going to be fair. >> yeah, totally, thank you for being fair, ari. >> i think, like i was saying, i think that donald trump can't say something when people are
experiencing something else. like their reality is going to "trump" his words. and what's also interesting is that donald trump's idea that he can kind of strongman his way through things. it's really an extension of how he's always operated as this extremely masculine, aggressive, flashy person. and that's not something that outwardly manifested as a way to run the country. >> it may have been popular in certain parts of the country so everybody goes, oh, people like this. the question now is whether people like the results as a governing strategy. we're just 7 1/2 weeks in. we'll see what the results are, it's just our job to report them. coming up, the last word of the week which is kind of sort of related to that video right there. at angie's list, we beliee
report tonight is still missing. politico noting it allegedly contains information about the layout of trump tower as well as other security materials. in a statement today that did confirm the theft, the agency stressed the secret service laptops are generally highly secure, they require multiple authorizations to protect their contents. we'll bring you more on that story as we have it. we will be right back.
long ago, an empire was born evony the original empire-building game that started it all. so what became of this legendary game? well... it just arrived on your smartphone! evony download it now and play for free! the search for relief often leads here.s, today there's drug-free aleve direct therapy. a high intensity tens device that uses technology once only in doctors' offices. for deep penetrating relief at the source. aleve direct therapy.
cuts the environmental protection agency? saw that coming. the only environments you care for are fairways and greens and the dangerous marshland you call a haircut. cuts to the national endowment for the arts? not surprised. the only painting you like is paintings of yourselves when they take out the neck fat. but meals on wheels? how dead inside do you have to be to not want old people to get food? your heart is so small, it makes your tiny hands look like catcher mitts. old people voted for you. your key demographics were old people and older people. they believed you when you said you cared about them. there's nothing more lowlife than lying to the elderly. you should know that, you're 70. don't you hate when it people lie to you and say things like, i'll try it to make it down next week, i'm on kayak and there's no flights. >> seth meyers' point of view
there. that's "last night" for tonight. the preview of the confirmation hearings is this sunday. i hope you'll join us. stay tuned. "all in with chris hayes" is trumped up. let's play "hardball." >> good evening, i'm chris >> good evening, i'm chris matthews in washington on st. patrick's day. he told a big fib and two weeks he tried to cover its up. this is the sad embarrassing fact of the president. it started with an early morning tweet from mar-a-lago that his predecessor had wiretapped his home. the president and his interpreters doubled down defying all evidence to the contrary. they insisted donald trump was right.