tv The 11th Hour With Brian Williams MSNBC April 25, 2017 8:00pm-9:01pm PDT
o'reilly got fired by fox news and said he didn't think bill o'reilly did anything wrong, in effect denied for o'reilly the accusations of the women or accepted the accusations of the women and still thinks that's not wrong. all of that is in that room and watching ivanka trump pretend it doesn't exist was something to see. thank you for joining us tonight. appreciate it. the 11th hour starts right now. tonight, did president trump's most senior national security official break the law before he was fired? also, another legal blow to this president and his hard line approach to illegal migration. and ivanka trump makinger debut as a white house adviser on the world stage today. but not everyone liked what they heard. "the 11th hour" begins now. good evening once again from our headquarters here in new york.
day 96 of the trump administration an it's all turned back to russia again and mike flynn. the top democrat and the top republican in the house oversight committee say trump's former national security adviser may have broken the law by not disclosing money he made from russia and turkey. how much money? quote, flynn received $45,000 in december of 2015 to speak at a russia tv event. he also received more than $500,000 for lobbying for the turkish government. both chairman jason chaffetz and elijah cummings taukds about flynn with msnbc today. >> as general flynn was required to proactively ask permission prior to engaging with russia and turkey. not only was he supposed to ask for permission, he was supposed to get permission and he didn't. and so this goes back for, you know, a year prior to donald trump ever becoming the president. so it's not as if the white
house isn't responding. there just aren't documents and that's the problem. >> do you think michael flynn broke the law? >> it doesn't appear as if he complied with the law. don't see evidence that he complied with the law. >> this is not some witch hunt. this is about a fight for the soul of our democracy. and i want to be real clear on that. what i'm trying to do is make sure that we pursue this investigation and go where the evidence leads. our next step is to hopefully sit down with the white house and explain to them that they don't determine what we investigate as a congress, we do. >> sean spicer was also pressed on this today during the white house briefing. >> the president feel that he was misled by general flynn? >> i think the president made a decision a while ago because flynn was not straight with the vice president at the time and let him go. i think he stands by that decision and it's up to others to review all of the information that's coming out.
>> does he now feel that he also wasn't straight with him -- >> a lot of the facts are still coming out. i know the president made a decision a couple of months ago, it was the right decision and we've moved on and we'll continue to stay focused on -- >> at the time he made the decision he said that flynn was a victim of a media witch hunt, said he was a good man. does he still feel that way? >> all of the facts are coming out on that. i think he made a decision a few months ago and stands by that decision. >> on the senate side, richard burr talked to reporters on the hill today. while he wouldn't say whether he thinks michael flynn broke the law, he did discuss the issue of immunity. >> is there any way you give flynn immunity to testify? >> no. >> there's no way? >> no. >> would subpoena him to -- >> anybody who has at least been associated in some way, shape or form through news articles have walked in the door volunteering to testify orublicly said they
would love to testify. don't see the need for any type of subpoena process. >> let's bring in tonight's panel. the deputy national security adviser during the george w. bush administration, now he's msnbc's senior national security analyst, former chief of staff at the pentagon and the cia, jeremy bash, yahoand host of np indivisible. juan and jeremy and i have filled out the paperwork that you have to fill out if you are going to work in the white house and look at secret stuff. this is the really, really big. there's a question i want to put on the screen. because it says do you have or have you had close or continuing contact with a foreign national within the last seven years. now there are also questions about whether you have any financial gain from any foreign
power. juan, explain to me how the white house can't produce this document that could hold open a very heavy door. >> well i think there's some -- several issues here at play, not only with respect to general flynn's legal liability but also questions about what contact she was having perhaps even on behalf of the president or the white house. and i think that's where you have some of the debate and discussion. because i think there have been requests to understand what contacts general flynn was having on behalf of then president-elect and then also trump as he served as the national security adviser. but with respect to the form itself, i can't speak for the white house. i don't know why they aren't producing it. i'm sure they will have to at some point to the committees investigating this. and no doubt this is going to be further subject of consideration, given the fact that's a pretty clear question.
but it could be that there was confusion on the part of general flynn, who knows. but at this point -- >> confusion. i filled this form out twice. i went to work in the white house and then i got married and went back to the white house. on my honeymoon i went to turkey and bought a rug. i remember having a discussion about whether that constituted any sort of contact with a foreign agent. people who work in the government take these forms seriously and you're interviewed by fbi agents afterward. how did michael flynn get the needed security clearances to be present in donald trump's briefings during the transition without having a current and accurate background check form on file? >> well, nicole, you're imminently correct. this is a huge red flag. it's not the only time we've had red flags regarding general flynn. first he failed to disclose the information on his clearance form.
he failed to disclose this on his ethics form, his oge 278 form. he failed to disclose his work undethe foreign agent's registration act on behalf of the gornment of turkey. that is tle forms that were incomplete, sloppily filled out or purposely incorrect. and then of course he failed to comply with the constitutional and policy requirement to go back to the department of the army, back to the pentagon and seek to obtain payments from a foreign government which every single military general officer, even people i work with have to do all of the time. so when you're four for four it really strains kra duality to say he was just sloppy. >> i want to get you back in on this, juan. you have deep tie to this administration's security officials. and i know you were an informal or formal adviser during the transition. i don't want to get that wrong. >> formal, to director pompeo at the cia.
what concerns did you hear about general flynn, if any? >> well i don't think i can speak to anything i was hearing during that time period, nicole. i'm sorry about that. but i think certainly there were questions about general flynn in terms of his capacity in that role. keep in mind he was a very successful military intelligence officer. but had not served in a policy role and certainly had not been at those levels and certainly not worked in the white house. there were questions and in general in the policy community about whether or not he was ready for this role. keep in mind as well, this may have something to do with the forms. he had just recently retired or been asked to leave as head of theefense intelligence agency. he then took on private practice and then returned back fairly quickly thereafter. it's in that period where he was engaged in all of these activities that he's gotten into trouble with.
and it may be that he was not prepared to return properly and had not checked not only all of the forms properly but had not thought through the consequences of what he would have to do to assume the role of the national security adviser. i think there were questions as to whether or not he was prepared. there may be a question now as to whether or not he was, you know, preparing properly with all of his paperwork and certainly thinking through the due diligence that's required to assume this kind of a role at the highest levels of the u.s. government. >> juan, this is something i heard from general hayden as well about whether he was properly suited, whether he had the proper profile in terms of experience and temperament. but i think this goes deeper than just not filling out forms properly and not being prepared. do you think he lied on these forms? >> i have no idea, nicole. it's hard to tell. again, i think jeremy is right that there's a number of instances where she's avoided
providing complete information both inside the white house as well as apparently on these forms. it looks suspicious. and the problem here, of course, is perception becomes reality. perception of whether he was evading, perception of whether there was potential collusion, perception of whether or not he was promising things to the russian government before he had authority to do so. all of this is problematic regardless of whether or not he was actually intentionally evading or lying. i can't peer into his soul and that's certainly what investigates may be looking at. the perception is damning and that's why we're having the conversation. >> jeremy, i'm going to ask you to do some soul peering in a moment. listen to sean spicer's response when he was asked about the money flynn got from russian tv today. >> does the white house consider mike flynn's payment from russia today to be a payment from a foreign government? >> i don't know. all of that occurred prior to
his service. >> does this white house consider a payment from russia today to be a payment from a foreign government? >> what i'm saying is everything he did was prior to coming to this white house. >> right. >> for us to determine someone else -- >> do you consider that to be a payment from a foreign government? >> i'm sorry, what? >> if someone took money from russia today -- >> if they were an employee of the white house, absolutely. >> jeremy, do we have a problem here? >> yeah. i mean russia today is basically the state propaganda arm of the russian federation. and the intelligence community on january 5th when they issued hair assessment that russia meddled in the election and favored donald trump, they cited russia as the tip of the spear of the attack in the democracy. is there's no getting around this. this was collusion between the russian government and at least one member of the trump inner circle to get paid for this action and then of course the action and the payment wasn't
disclosed. this is something that investigators will have to follow up with. >> what 's your sense of how ths team is doing in terms of getting anywhere close to a place that's anywhere close to a place that allows them to turn the corner onhe russian story? >> nowou have flynn out of the white house so one cld ask why not turn over whatever paperwork you have. you've cut ties with this person. why not say here you go, he's not working for us anywhere, have at it. with the president doing what he's doing, with sean spicer doing what he's doing, he's leading to the conversations that we're having. no one had the president's ear on foreign policy throughout the campaign and the early part of this administration than michael flynn himself. at the very least there was a conflict of interest with areas of turkey and russia with the payments. did the administration, did the president know -- we also know that michael flynn out of all of the other people who are part of the administration should have known pet better. this is his second
administration. the second one he's been fired from as well. >> charlie, let me ask you directly. mike. flynn was someone who made democrats anxious for a whole lot of reasons, his temperament, policy instincts, what not, but he also made republicans uncomfortable for the questions that emerged very early on about possible ethics. what's your sense of the party's tolerance for this story dragging on and on. >> it is going to drag on an on. there are a number of innocent explanations for this, none of which is plausible. and the white house's refusing to be transparent is compounding the problem. when he was fired, the story never added up in the first place, the fact she was having a conversation that donald trump says i would have no problem with him having that conversation and yet he lied. again why would you lie about something that didn't -- so the question is what did the white
house know that general flynn was up to and when thadid they w it. there's something about the story as it keeps unraveling that raises more and more questions. so again, you go back to this transition which was a challenged transition. this was probably one of the worst selections and i think it reflects very very poorly on donald trump's judgment and of the judgment of the administration. >> and you see sean spicer now trying to distance michael flynn from the administration. no, he was the guy. he was the foreign policy guy. his name was floated as a possible vice presidential running mate as well. you're not going to fool us when it comes to mike. flynn. he was front and center from day one. >> let's end with juan because i want to ask you on the substance of this. we know that michael flynn was having conversations with russia about the easing of sanctions at the same time that the obama white house was announcing new sanctions and expelling russian diplomats from this country.
i'm not going to ask you to speak about anything privileged. is this a problem not just on the optics that you described. is there a smoking gun here at the policy level? >> i think there is a policy problem when you have, you know, two governments in essence operating on behalf of the u.s. or at least the perception of that by one of the major world powers. if you have, you know, general flynn having a voice on behalf of then president-elect trump arguinagainst existing u.s. policy or at least suggesting that there's going to be a change in policy, that's never good. and i have been an advocate for the continuity of our policy, especially in foreign policy. there can be changes and shifts in opinion, of course. but when you have this moment of transition, which was without a doubt the rockiest we've seen in recent memory and in the midst of that you have perhaps
different policy messages coming out from perspective of foreign pomcy and on something as important as russian policy, that is troubling, problematic. purely from a policy perspective. there are lots of lessons learned here. but one of the lessons is one government at a time. we're all americans first. and everyone needs to remember that. >> jeremy, former acting attorney general yates is scheduled to testify on may 8 president. what do you expect her to say? >> she's going to answer the question what did the white house know and when did they know it. she came to the white house in the early days of the administration. she flagged the concerns about the conversation between flynn and dislkislyak and the fact th flynn has not been truthful with the vice president and maybe others. but for 17 days as we've talked about many times, for 17 days with to be white house, the president kept flynn in access, meaning they kept him in the white house as national security
adviser, gave him access to highly classified information and put him in the seat of power. and it wasn't until the press revealed the fact of those kislyak conversations that the president turned around and fired him once pence was of course embarrassed by the sayings. sally yates is gng to have to describe the 17 days. we're going to hear about that on may 8 when she testifies. i think juan is right, we're all americans first. we should have one government at a time. this transition requires us to ask very hard questions about how this all went down. >> we'll see that testimony in the senate judiciary committee. no one is going anywhere. stay with us. when we come back we'll dive into the latest legal speed bump for this white house. "the 11th hour" continues in a moment. this is the new new york. we are building new airports all across the state. new roads and bridges. new mass transit.
new business friendly environment. new lower taxes. and new university partnerships to grow the businesses of tomorrow today. learn more at esd.ny.gov ito treat your toughy nasal allergies... ...listen up. unlike pills that don't treat congestion, clarispray covers 100 percent of your nasal allergy symptoms. clarispray. from the makers of claritin. ♪♪"let me tell you 'bouts" the birds the beesn ♪ ♪ ♪ and the flowers and the trees♪ ♪ and the moon up above ♪ and a thing called love. ♪ ♪ let me tell you 'bout the stars in the sk♪, ♪ a girl and a guy ♪ ♪ and the way they could kiss on a night like this ♪ life's as big as you make it. introducing the all-new ven seater volkswagen ats ♪ and a thing called love.
get your ancestrydna kit. spit. mail it in. learn about you and the people and places that led to you. go explore your roots. take a walk through the past. meet new relatives. and see how a place and its people are all a part of you. ancestrydna. save 20% through wednesday at ancestrydna.com whfight back fastts, with tums smoothies. it starts dissolving the instant it touches your tongue. and neutralizes stomach acid at the source. ♪ tum -tum -tum -tum smoothies! only from tums i am totally blind. and for years i've struggled with non-24, a circadian rhythm disorder that can turn my sleep cycles upside down. it kept me from doing the things i truly love to do. sometimes i'd show up early; sometimes i was too late.
find your awesome with the xfinity x1 voice remote. that's amazing! who is going to pay for that wall? you better believe it. and they'll do it. on day one we will begin working on an impenetrable physical tall powerful beautiful southern border wall. on the first day i will take the following actions to restore the rule of law. we'll cancel all federal funding to sanctuary cities out. >> welcomeback to "the 11th hour." last night i was funding if are the big beautiful wal and tonight it's his pledge to gut funding for sanctuary cities
that's in jeopardy. a federal judge issuing a hit to one of trump's executive orders. the injunction forbids the white house from withholding federal funds from the sanctuary cities. my panel is still with me. let's start with the stakes for donald trump if he reverses himself. yesterday news about he's backing down from funding the wall. tonight h what price could he pay for this? >> he does back down on the funding for the wall and rush limbaugh who has been carrying water for him rather consistently -- >> he's been carrying elephants for him. >> rush limbaugh says that the president is caving on this. that's what president trump doesn't want. that he's caving on a central promise of his campaign.
>> i think he have that sound. let's take a listen. >> i'm not happy to have to pass this on. i'm very very troubled to have to pass this on. but it looks like, from here, right here right now, it looks like president trump is caving on his demand for a measly $1 billion in the budget for his wall on the border with mexico. >> and here's how reince priebus white house chief of staff reacted to the course action. he said it's the ninth circuit going bananas. the decision is something that will be overturned eventually and will win at the supreme court level at some point. is this war against the federal judiciary to explain every failure and failed campaign promise going to end well? >> it's the third time an immigration order has been shot down for this president. as you were saying, he hears
people like rush limbaugh, he's talking to his base. and i think that's why you heard the rhetoric from jeff sessions last week, hitting hard against new york city as a sanctuary city saying crime has gone up here when it has not. that resonates well with the base with the president saying at the end of the day i may not be able to accomplish this but boy did i go out fighting for it. >> this will play very well with the base. on the other hand the court ruling is on conservative constitutional ground, citing the 10th amendment, the supreme court decision saying that you couldn't force states to take the extra medicaid funding. >> it's about the appropriations process. >> and going back to congress. >> that's right. that the president does not have this power, that congress has this power. all of these are principles that five minutes ago conservatives would have been supportive of. it's going to play out. but this issue of the sanctuary cities is red meat for the tru
base. >> i want to bring juan and jeremy back into this. one of the argumts that donald trump made during the course of the campaign for his hard line immigration policies was a national security argument. look what's happening in europe, look what's happening with the flood of refugees, the wall in mexico keeping a flood of drugs and crime from coming over. i wonder if any of you ever bought that argument and i wonder if there's ever been any talk of the tie between donald trump's immigration policies and national security that you've ever l evheard, juan. >> there's always been talk of a potential wall. obviously we've had funding for a wall in the prior two administrations actually and it's been built in pieces and parts. so the idea of a wall isn't new, frankly. and the idea that there are drugs and human smugglers and even potential terrorists coming across that border is not new. i think the challenge is that it's not the only source of the
threat. most of the illegal immigration that we deal with has to deal with visa overstays and other types of immigration that have nothing to do with the southern border. but the southern border presents real risk. there are challenges. the question is do we want to put all of our faith and confidence in building a wall to deal with all of the potential national security threats that we have. when you look at terrorism, we have to deal with the radicalization of home grown individuals, american citizens, naturalized citizens and that's a reality. there are other kinds of threats in terms of the rise of crime and drug use and criminality in the country. it's not all just reliant on the southern border. but that is an issue. and i think we can't make this a binary question of either/or. at the same time we do have to make a rational choice here. is it worth a billion dollars to put into a wall versus, for
example, an exit system that tracks who actually leaves the country when they're supposed to, which we presently don't have in place. >> and jeremy, i know that juan just made the place about the people here on visa overstays. obviously the 9/11 hijackers were by and large all here on some sort of visa overstay. what from a national security perspective is the wisest course when it comes to immigration policy and do you see any link between the case donald trump makes when he talks about homeland security, national security and this big beautiful wall? >> i don't know of a single case of a terrorist coming across the southern border who committed acts in the united states who would have been stopped but for the absence of a wall. i don't understand the nexus there. as far as the overall travel ban, the muslim ban which the president signed as an executive order and of course the federal courts stepped in and blocked. >> twice. >> there was a 90-daytime period
in which the president said the terrorists are streaming over the border. here we are at day 100 of the administration. no terrorists have streamed over the border. and i think ain the fear, the oking of fears is unnecessary sir. we can have a rational discussion about immigration but to tie it back to the terrorists streaming over the board is unproductive and dangerous. >> thank you jeremy, juan and charlie. still to come, an unexpected response to ivanka trump while she was sitting alongside some of the world's most powerful women. "the 11th hour" is back after this. where's frank? it's league night! 'saved money on motorcycle insurance with geico! goin' up the country. bowl without me. frank.' i'm going to get nachos. snack bar's closed. gah! ah, ah ah. ♪ ♪ i'm goin' up the country, baby don't you wanna go? ♪ ♪ i'm goin' up the country, baby don't you wanna go? ♪
geico motorcycle, great rates for great rides. try new flonase sensimistgies. instead of allergy pills. it delivers a gentle mist to help block six key inflammatory substances. most allergy pills only block one. new flonase sensimist. bryan denton: we spent almost the entirety of the next 10 hours under fire. you know, everybody was very focused, looking out the window, scanning for car bombs. being outside of a vehicle was suicide. to say that i wasn't operating at a constant level of fear, i'd be lying to you. if i didn't believe in the importance of journalism, i wouldn't be able to continue to do this work. ( ♪ ) i'm bryan denton, photojournalist for the new york times.
i am totally blind. and i live with non-24, a circadian rhythm disorder that can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the people, places, and things i love. the people i love have always been there for me. and now, i'm there for them, too. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424 to learn more.
welcome back to "the 11th hour." first daughter ivanka trump was booed on the international stage today as he defended her father. he spoke alongside angela merkel and the head of the imf. it's a bit hard to hear but take a listen. >> he's been a tremendous champion of supporting families and enabling them to thrive. in the new reality of -- >> you hear the reaction from the audience. >> i have certainly heard the criticism from the media and that's been perpetuated. >> the boos didn't stop ivanka trump as she defended her father and her own white house role in an interview with nbc's hallie jackson. >> one of the things that's amazing about my father is he's always been auge advocate of
occ curating ideas and no one person or party has the monopoly on the ideas. he knows i'm an honest broker. even when my view points are diver gentleman, don't have a hidden agenda. >> joining our conversation, stephanie rule. thank you for being with us. i want to start with you because you have been on this story and on this beat and covering ivanka trump's role, sometimes changing role in the administration an i wonder what you make of today's events. >> listen, ivanka trump has now put herself officially in the hot seat. and the issue is she has to choose a lane. those who are saying how can the first daughter get booed. you have to understand the comments she makes about president trump. they're through the eyes of his daughter. you lose those privileges when you take one of the most prominent roles as senior
adviser to the president. and to sit there and simply say he's been a tremendous asset to women in all that he does to support families. the problem with her message, though it's inspiring and making people feel optimistic, it's simply not reflected in policies set by the administration. so he's putting herself in a position where she wants to be the face and the brand but behind that you have to be accountable. and so we'll give her some period of time because she said this is a learning period. but take this for one moment, not just is she supporting her father. she herself said women, it is our obligation to come together, support one another and raise one another up. she then sat down and gave an exclusive print interview to breitbart news. this is the organization that penned the headline, birth control makes women unattractive and crazy. so which is it? number one and two just don't seem to be aligned. >> steph, i want to tell you what i heard. i talked to one of the senior
advisers traveling with her today and they said it was a hiss that came from three people in theaudience. i asked if it bothered ivanka and this official told me she's one tough cookie and seemed to suggest that ivanka know she's not going continue to have it both ways. but does it appear that she's building a coalition within the government of like minded men or women for the policy she first laid out at the rnc in her convention speech. one of these thing is not like the other. she gave a speech that could have been given at the democratic convention. have you seen any evidence at a policy level that she's building consensus around her policy ideas? >> absolutely not. one would say what is it exactly that she believes in because one of the attributes many people says she has, she's the president trump whisperer. yet she has been by his side for
the last 34 years when he's said and done things that we found outrageous. she was in palm beach the weekend he sent the tweet saying that president o she cannot be accountable for all of her father's actions. but seeing she's in that position. today she said gender pay gap is an issue. women in the workplace. we already know that workplace protection regulations that were put in place by president obama have now been rolled back. we know that president obama wanted large corporations to disclose how they were specifically paying their employees so we can see by race and gender how they were being impacted. none of those things are on the table. does it mean they can't be. are we hopeful that ivanka's passions will turn into policy. without a doubt. >> the thing i hear most frequently from republicans privately is they're not sure it's appropriate for her to be
there, they're not sure anyone else could get away with it. but of all of the things that keeps them up at night about donald trump, ivanka trump is not one of them. >> we've heard the jokes from "saturday night live" to dinner conversations. as long as jump and jared are in the room, people can be a little more at ease with regard to how sporadic her father can act. she's the exact opposite. everything she doe is said with precision. she doesn't turn to twitter right away. when she was speaking in germany, she had the same talking points. i've heard that myth perpetuated through the media. people are asking are you adviser, are you first daughter. what is your rel here. that's yet to be determined. but i think it goes back to trump's base. i think he loves having her with him. he trusts her. and as long as his base -- you spend a lot of time with these women who voted with trump in this country with all due respect to women in germany who were there listening to her, i think the president is paying more close attention to what
women at home are saying about her and when that turns is when he's going to start to worry. >> thlet me ask one for questio. do you think her brand is taking a hit? her brand is much broader than politics obviously. >> her brand has taken off globally, internationally. it's more of a partisan brand given her last name and the role she's decided to take with her father. sheer revenue, she's doing pretty well right now and i think obviously she's thinking about what happens four to eight years after the fact. it's no just her father's image and brand she's protecting, it's her own. >> steph last word. >> she's thinking about that brand right now. to the point she made to hallie, people know how i feel, where i stand. do they? while she's taking a lee ing in her job, she owns the company. she is the sole owner of the ivanka trump. the people left behind are her employees. i remind you three trademarks in china the day she then at dinner
sitting next to xi jinping. and we're dancing around this is, what does complicit mean. i don't feel good about the word acmplice. it's prey clear. president trump has done things th are n positive in terms of equality. the idea of make america great again. in the past it wasn't so great for anyone speaking equality. so it's time -- rubber is hitting the road. action time. let's go. >> we would be having this same conversation if this was chillily clinton sitting there if her mother had won the election, speaking on behalf of her mother or first daughter. this isn't limited to the trump family. >> think of how criticized hillary clinton was when she was first lady. >> thank you so much. steph, you're north going anywhere. when we come back, just how serious is the threat from north korea that the white house is taking the unusual step of
bringing every member of the u.s. senate into the white house grounds for an update? we'll talk about that when "the 11th hour" continues. company says they'll only paye three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. with a crust made chfrom scratche and mixes crisp vegetables with all white meat chicken, and bakes it to perfection. because making the perfect dinner isn't easy as pie but finding someone to enjoy it with sure is. marie callender's. it's time to savor. i use what's already inside me to reach my goals. so i liked when my doctor told me i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals
by activating what's within me with once-weekly trulicity. trulicity is not insulin. it helps activate my body to do what it's supposed to do release its own insulin. trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. i take it once a week, and it works 24/7. it comes in an easy-to-use pen and i may even lose a little weight. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable prescription medicine to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. trulicity is not insulin. it should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take trulicity if you or a family member has had medullary thyroid cancer, if you've had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to trulicity. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms such as itching, rash, or trouble breathing; a lump or swelling in your neck;
or severe pain in your stomach area. serious side effects may include pancreatitis, which can be fatal. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may make existing kidney problems worse. with trulicity, i click to activate what's within me. if you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers with a non-insulin option, click to activate your within. ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity. with a non-insulin option, click to activate your within. whether you're after supreme performance... ♪ ...advanced intelligence... ...or breathtaking style... ...there's a c-class just for you. decisions, decisions, decisions. lease the c300 sedan for $389 a month
at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. welcome back. tomorrow the white house will host all 100 senators for a briefing on north korea. but the white house issic maing it clear that just because they're hosting the meeting doesn't mean it's their meeting. joining our conversation, david jolly joins me in the studio. senior politics reporter frts u.s. today is here and vivian joins us, the white house reporter for the associated press. i want to start with you guys. tell me what the white house is saying about bringing 100 senators down to the oeob where they have to create a secure space for a briefing like this. have you heard them offer any explanation that makes more sense than it makes to me? >> it sounds like trump extended
the offer to mitch mcconnell and they're saying it's for logistical reasons. but as you pointed out, why would you bus 100 members of congress down pennsylvania avenue to a space that you would have to custom outfit to make it secure. and that's why it's raised some skepticism among democrats in particular. particularly since the president is unclear whether he's going to attend. why this is being done. they may be being used for a photo op. but when you talk to republicans, they say well, it's just an indication of the important nature that the president is assigning to this issue. and then the white house contradicts that. i guess i'll let vivian have a crack at it. >> my question for you is are you picking up the sense that this is about the optics of the 100-day mark and looking like he's sort of firmly in command? and i understand that it's his secretary of state and secretary of defense who are at this point
scheduled to attend the briefing. what are you picking up as the rationale for this from white house sources? >> there may be a little bit of the 100-day mark trying to check off a couple of accomplishments before those final days roll in. but i have a different theory from my conversations with folks at the white house. keep in mind way back at the beginning of april, when missile strikes were launched against syria, against the assad regime, president trump went ahead and did it and he did not consult congress and there was a lot of backlash. even though the move was very much celebrated,here was some backlash by people who said he didn't go about it the right way, he didn't go through the constitutional protocols necessary to launch -- to have any kind of military strike. so i think there's a little bit of that at play with the north korea issue, is that if he's going to take action, he wants to do it right. he does not want any pushback
from the hill and he wants everybody on board, everybody being on the same page and it's part of his outreach effort in a way. so there is, there is something to be commended -- he has to be commended for that, that effort there. >> and it seems like national security is an area where she is trying to build more consensus than he's been able to build about his domestic agenda. he had senators mick caccain do dinner. is it effective? >> it's bread and butter for mb like donald trump to protect strength. this is not normal. this does not happen. this is a president who is learning national security and defense of foreign policy on the job. go back to the campaign. the constructively ignorant statements he made about nato. and about our presence in the pacific. and now he is confronting, as commander in chief, something that he said in a recent ap
interview was much greater than he ever realized, matters of national security, life and death. this is a president who is learning on the job. and many presidents do, right? george bush came in, 43, thinki he wou be an education president, a domestic licy president and then he was faced with 9/11. he at least had the dignity and self respect to recognize that he was new to the game of foreign policy. donald trump has engaged in bluster and now he's engaging real-life threats. >> all right. so coming up, donald trump is headed for another face-off with with members of his own party it so appears. "the 11th hour" will be back after this. nnected business wor. at&t network security helps protect business, from the largest financial markets to the smallest transactions, by sensing cyber-attacks in near real time and automatically deploying countermeasures. keeping the world of business connected and protected.
that's the power of and. at red lobster's lobsterfestime. any of these 9 lobster dishes could be yours. so don't resist delicious new lobster mix and match or lobsterfest surf and turf because you won't have this chance for long. working on my feet all day gave me pain here. in my knees. so i stepped on this machine and got my number, which matched my dr. scholl's custom fit orthotic inserts.
so i get immediate relief from my foot pain. my knee pain. find a machine at drscholls.com. i am totally blind. and for years i've struggled with non-24, a circadian rhythm disorder that can turn my sleep cycles upside down. it kept me from doing the things i truly love to do. sometimes i'd show up early; sometimes i was too late. and sometimes, even though i was there... i didn't really feel..."there." talk to your doctor, and call 844-234-2424 to learn more.
proposal. he feels burnt on the hh care beat. >> is it too complicated or are the odds too long? >> president trump doesn't like complicated things. we know from his personal business he doesn't mind racking up debt but let's look at what they are trying to do. to say we are going to solve things by lowering the corporate tax rate. there is not a direct line by taking corporate tax rate at 35% and moving it to 15%. you not going to have we are suddenly going to create jobs. you already have the majority of those companies paying more like 22% rate. some even pay nothing. president trump, though, we haven't seen his taxes has likely paid none. so it's not that this 35% is a sticking point holding corporate america from creating jobs. there are many issues like repatrioting the trillions of dollars that korpgs have sitting overseas. those specific things that we want to hear out of the white house that is going to change. president obama, they wanted to
get that done and couldn't. so like all things the devil is in the details and remember many people will push back because we still have not seen president trump's taxes. he comes from real estate development. that industry has more tax loopz loopholes than any other. he has yet to show us that he will put country before self. we have seen the amount of self dealing that continues with president trump not divesting himself from his businesses. this guy can change things around net operating losses and erase the hundreds of millions of dollars he could pottially owe the government in taxes that he has been rolling forward. people want to see president trump's taxes. when guys like steve mu mnuchin are faced with these road blocks it is pretty tough. >> you are covering this washington, this donald trump white house. what is their side of the story? >> well, i think steph is
actually right in this is the same thing as on health care which is that the president just wants something and that he is outsource ag lot of it to the republican leadership and saying summoning paul ryan and saying get this done without giving them much detail is setting an unrealistic goal at 15%. let's put that in perspective. president obama talked about a rate of about 28%. while there is generally broad bipartisan agreement 15% is nowhere in the range of realistic. every member i talked to on the hill including republicans are a little bit angry at the white house for putting them in this impossible situation. it does ring bells back to the health care debate, as well, where the president sets unrealistic expectations in terms of timing and puts it on the shoulders of the republican leadership. now, the reason why they are trying to do this this way now in terms of corporate is because
they think they can jam it through on reconciliation with 51 votes and without democrats. that doesn't guarantee you anything in the way ofgrowth. >> we should defend the trump administration for a moment. one of e reasons you are seeing stocks up so much isn't because it is this 15% mark. it's because of clarity. there was a threat that the obama administration was going to put more and more regulation on corporations so they weren't spending. when they know what regulation looks like they are more inclined to spend and move forward. that is a positive as far as corporates go. >> steph will get an extra commercial in her show tomorrow. thank you. coming up, president trump with a message so many people have been waiting to hear from him. we're back right after this. when you have allergies,
adult 7+ promotes alertness and mental sharpness in dogs 7 and older. (ray) the difference has been incredible. she is much more aware. she wants to learn things. (vo) purina pro plan bright mind. nutrition that performs. juswho own them,ople every business is different. but every one of those businesses will need legal help as they age and grow. whether it be help starting your business, vendor contracts or employment agreements. legalzoom's network of attorneys can help you every step of the way so you can focus on what you do. we'll handle the legal stuff that comes up along the way. legalzoom. legal help is here. just head & shoulders? (gasp) i thought it was just for, like, dandruff new head & shoulders. cleans, protects and moisturizes to... ...get up to 100% flake-free and unbelievably beautiful hair it's not head & shoulders, it's the new head & shoulders
helping small businesses.ut, jamie -- damage your vehicle? we got you covered. [ glass shatters ] property damage? that's what general liability's for. what?! -injured employee? -ow. workers' comp helps you pay for a replacement. what's happening? this is carla. how's it going? and if anything comes up, our experts are standing by. ♪ boo! whfight back fastts, with tums smoothies. it starts dissolving the instant it touches your tongue. and neutralizes stomach acid at the source. ♪ tum -tum -tum -tum smoothies! only from tums
those who deny the holocaust are an accomplice to this horrible evil and will never be silent. we just won't. we will never, ever be silent in the face of evil again. this is my pledge to you. we will confront anti-semitism. [ applause ] we will stamp out prejudice. we will condemn hatred. we will bear witness and we will act. >> we spent a lot of time on
politics tonight as we do every night. but we will give the last word to president trump earli today at the holocaust remembrance ceremony. the last czar of russia came to power 1894. he was forced to abdicate the throne about two decades later, the bolshevik revolution. 1917, the russian revolution. we're now a century on from that. but as it happened, in 1917, the czar and his family were scared off the throne that year. but then the revolutionaries didn't kill them right away. they kept them alive for a while. they kept them first in one of the russian royal palaces just south of st. petersburg.